Remote Sensing of Boreal Forest Phenology: Methods and Applications
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S. -
CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties. -
Influence of Habitat and Bat Activity on Moth Community Composition and Seasonal Phenology Across Habitat Types
INFLUENCE OF HABITAT AND BAT ACTIVITY ON MOTH COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND SEASONAL PHENOLOGY ACROSS HABITAT TYPES BY MATTHEW SAFFORD THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Advisor: Assistant Professor Alexandra Harmon-Threatt, Chair and Director of Research ABSTRACT Understanding the factors that influence moth diversity and abundance is important for monitoring moth biodiversity and developing conservation strategies. Studies of moth habitat use have primarily focused on access to host plants used by specific moth species. How vegetation structure influences moth communities within and between habitats and mediates the activity of insectivorous bats is understudied. Previous research into the impact of bat activity on moths has primarily focused on interactions in a single habitat type or a single moth species of interest, leaving a large knowledge gap on how habitat structure and bat activity influence the composition of moth communities across habitat types. I conducted monthly surveys at sites in two habitat types, restoration prairie and forest. Moths were collected using black light bucket traps and identified to species. Bat echolocation calls were recorded using ultrasonic detectors and classified into phonic groups to understand how moth community responds to the presence of these predators. Plant diversity and habitat structure variables, including tree diameter at breast height, ground cover, and vegetation height were measured during summer surveys to document how differences in habitat structure between and within habitats influences moth diversity. I found that moth communities vary significantly between habitat types. -
Impacts of Native and Non-Native Plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better Than Non-Natives?
Impacts of Native and Non-native plants on Urban Insect Communities: Are Native Plants Better than Non-natives? by Carl Scott Clem A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama December 12, 2015 Key Words: native plants, non-native plants, caterpillars, natural enemies, associational interactions, congeneric plants Copyright 2015 by Carl Scott Clem Approved by David Held, Chair, Associate Professor: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Ray, Research Fellow: Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Debbie Folkerts, Assistant Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Robert Boyd, Professor: Department of Biological Sciences Abstract With continued suburban expansion in the southeastern United States, it is increasingly important to understand urbanization and its impacts on sustainability and natural ecosystems. Expansion of suburbia is often coupled with replacement of native plants by alien ornamental plants such as crepe myrtle, Bradford pear, and Japanese maple. Two projects were conducted for this thesis. The purpose of the first project (Chapter 2) was to conduct an analysis of existing larval Lepidoptera and Symphyta hostplant records in the southeastern United States, comparing their species richness on common native and alien woody plants. We found that, in most cases, native plants support more species of eruciform larvae compared to aliens. Alien congener plant species (those in the same genus as native species) supported more species of larvae than alien, non-congeners. Most of the larvae that feed on alien plants are generalist species. However, most of the specialist species feeding on alien plants use congeners of native plants, providing evidence of a spillover, or false spillover, effect. -
112 Larval Foodplant Records for 106 Species Of
112 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY LARVAL FOODPLANT RECORDS FOR 106 SPECIES OF NORTH AMERICAN MOTHS NOEL MCFARLAND P.O. Box 475, Geraldton, Western Australia 6530 Since I donated the remainder of my former North American insect collection to the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Cali fornia (Donahue, 1972), it now seems worthwhile to report many of the larval foodplant records associated with the moth life history material. These specimens (both immatures and associated adults) comprise about 40% of the total collection, and are now available for loan to specialists. The majority of species represented are from localities in California and Oregon; a few are from Arizona, central New Mexico and eastern Kansas. Foodplant records for some of these moths have already been published (Buckett, 1964, 1970; Hogue et aI., 1965; McFarland, 1959-1967); only a few of these have been repcated again here, but with corrected or additional data in all cases. Many of the foodplant names appearing here are entirely new records, or at least have never been published for the localities concerned, even though some of them may be known to certain workers. Probably fitting the latter category are some Oregon records which appeared in my Master's thesis (1963), of which 20 copies were privately distributed in 1963-64. These records still remain to be made "official" through publication, however, so are included in the present paper. I was inspired to compile this list after reading a recent plea by R. B. Dominick (1972) and an excellent paper by Shields, et al. (1970). I have essentially followed the format devised by the latter for reporting larval foodplants, as illustrated under the 14 butterfly species included in their paper. -
Insect Biodiversity on Prairies Lacking Fire Management
1 Insect Biodiversity on Prairies Lacking Fire Management with focus on Lepidoptera (Moths and Butterflies) Kyle Johnson Honorary Fellow, University of Wisconsin-Madison 445 Russell Labs, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706 [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................3 Introduction and Study Overview..............................................................................................................3 Study Sites..................................................................................................................................................4 Methods....................................................................................................................................................10 Results.......................................................................................................................................................14 Discussion..................................................................................................................................................47 Future Studies............................................................................................................................................48 References.................................................................................................................................................48 3 Acknowledgements This project was financially supported -
The1912field Season Summary
.- \ Number 2 NEWS 15 March, 1973 of the LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Editorial Committee of the NEWS . .... EDITOR: Dr. Charles V. Covell, Jr., Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Louisville, Louisville, Ky., USA, 40208 ASSOC. EDITOR: Dr. Paul A. Opler, Div. of Entomology, 201 Wellman Hall, Univ. of California, Berkeley, California, USA, 94720 Jo Brewer John Heath K. W. Philip J. Donald Eft G. Hesselbarth F. W. Preston Robert L. Langston Thomas C. Emmel Lloyd M. Martin G. W. Rawson H. A. Freeman F. Bryant Mather Mike Van Buskirk L. Paul Grey M. C. Nielsen E. C. Welling M. The 1912 Field Season Summary Introduce some young people to Lepidoptera this year. Once again we present a summary of collections, observations, and rearing work done during the 1972 season. I wish to thank the zone coordinators for a splendid job this time; the editing was a breeze. And to those rvho contributed, many thanks to you all. I hope those of you who did not participate in 1972 will consider sending at least a few sentences to your zone co ordinator this coming winter, especially with information you feel is most important and useful. I will not try to "summarize the summaries," except to say that the climatic conditions seem to have varied from one general area to the next, and that, while some areas suffered retardation or stifling of normal populations, collecting was gener ally fairly good. A number of new state or provincial records are included, so be on the lookout for these. Finally, Langston reports for an area--not included in the past: Hawaii. -
A Check List of the Lepidoptera of Beaver Creek State Park, Columbiana County, Ohio
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 25 Number 2 - Summer 1992 Number 2 - Summer Article 9 1992 June 1992 A Check List of the Lepidoptera of Beaver Creek State Park, Columbiana County, Ohio Roy W. Rings Ohio State University Eric H. Mezler Ohio Department of Natural Resources Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Rings, Roy W. and Mezler, Eric H. 1992. "A Check List of the Lepidoptera of Beaver Creek State Park, Columbiana County, Ohio," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 25 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol25/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. ------------~----- Rings and Mezler: A Check List of the Lepidoptera of Beaver Creek State Park, Colum 1992 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 115 A CHECK LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BEAVER CREEK STATE PARK, COLUMBIANA COUNTY, OHIO Roy W. Rings! and Eric H. Metzler2 ABSTRACT Results of a comprehensive survey of Lepidoptera occurring at a 12,334 hectare natural area in Columbiana County. Ohio conducted in 1985 and 1990 is presented. Ten species of skippers, 27 species of butterflies and 597 species and forms of moths were identified and recorded. Euagrotis forbesi, and Spo doptera eridania had not previously been collected in Ohio; and Polia nimbosa and Idia laurenti have been designated as special interest since they are con sidered rare Ohio residents. -
Zootaxa, the Hadeninae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) of Great
Zootaxa 2380: 1–75 (2010) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2010 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 2380 The Hadeninae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA MICHAEL G. POGUE Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, c/o Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC-168, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by L. Gall: 8 Dec. 2009; published: 26 Feb. 2010 Michael G. Pogue The Hadeninae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA (Zootaxa 2380) 75 pp.; 30 cm. 26 February 2010 ISBN 978-1-86977-471-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-472-1 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2010 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2010 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 2380 © 2010 Magnolia Press POGUE Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................................................................................................ -
Annotated Check List of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America North of Mexico
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysAnnotated 40: 1–239 (2010) check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.40.414 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico J. Donald Lafontaine1, B. Christian Schmidt2 1 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Biodiversity Program, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 2 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 Corresponding authors: J. Donald Lafontaine ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt (Chris. [email protected]) Academic editor: James K. Adams | Received 30 November 2009 | Accepted 14 February 2010 | Published 19 March 2010 Citation: Lafontaine JD, Schmidt BC (2010) Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico. ZooKeys 40: 1–239. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.40.414 Abstract An annotated check list of the North American species of Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera) is presented, consist- ing of 3693 species. One-hundred and sixty-six taxonomic changes are proposed, consisting of 13 species- group taxa accorded species status (stat. n. and stat. rev.), 2 revalidated genus-group taxa (stat. rev.), and 2 family-group taxa raised to subfamily. Sixty-nine species-group taxa are downgraded to junior synonyms or subspecies (stat. n., syn. rev., and syn. n.), and 6 genera relegated to synonymy. -
Ÿþd R a F T P E I R C O M M E N T S . W
Lancelot S. Houston P.O. Box 2177 Seaside, CA. 93955 3-19-08 CDFA c/o FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Jim Rains Comments 6 pp. and References 129 pp. 1220 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Fax 916-654-1018 [email protected] RE; Draft EIR Comments; Light Brown Apple Moth Eradication Program The DEIR should address and include analysis of the following including applicable references; CEQA compliance; Each affected City or County at a minimum should have a complete comprehensive Project EIR depository with all public comments in original form for public review. The purpose of a legally adequate Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is to discuss, analyze, and fully disclose the impacts and potential negative impacts of a stable finite project description. The aerial spraying action constituted a Project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and therefore the spraying was in violation of CEQA. The EIR must be an unbiased document. The EIR must provide full analysis of reasonable project alternatives. It’s of critical importance to accurately identify the proposed project area. The proposed project goal must be carefully identified and irrefutable facts must be provided that support the project goal as achievable. Eradication is not a reasonable goal. In September and October 2007 CDFA caused Dynamic Aviation to perform night time close to the ground aerial spraying of Suterra chemical products on urban populations in Monterey and Santa Cruz Counties. These actions were taken with the concurrence of USDA and EPA. The public was not given the opportunity to review a Draft EIR prior to the 2007 aerial spraying. -
Inventory of the Nolidae, Erebidae, and Noctuidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Plummers Island, Maryland Author(S): Michael G
Inventory of the Nolidae, Erebidae, and Noctuidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Plummers Island, Maryland Author(s): Michael G. Pogue Source: Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, 15(1):107-120. Published By: Biological Society of Washington DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2988/0097-0298(2008)15[107:IOTNEA]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2988/0097-0298%282008%2915%5B107%3AIOTNEA %5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Inventory of the Nolidae, Erebidae, and Noctuidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of Plummers Island, Maryland Michael G. Pogue Systematic Entomology Laboratory, P.S.I., Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, ࡆ Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, NMNH, MRC-168, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, U.S.A., e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—From 1902–2005 six species of Nolidae, 88 species of Erebidae, and 118 species of Noctuidae have been recorded from Plummers Island, Montgomery County, Maryland.