DOCSLIB.ORG

Visitor Monitoring in Finnish National Parks and ASTA Visitor Information System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visitor Monitoring in Finnish National Parks and ASTA Visitor Information System Visitor monitoring in Finnish national parks and ASTA visitor information system Liisa Kajala, Senior Advisor Metsähallitus, Natural Heritage Services Workshop – Visitor Monitoring in National Parks th Gardemoen Airport, October 17 , 2013 Contents of the Presentation • Protected areas in Finland • Development of visitor monitoring and information system in Finland and current practices • Use of visitor information • Future development Organisation of Metsähallitus 3 Performance setting and Steering of Natural Heritage Services 4 Natural Heritage services´ finances in 2012 NHS´activities are largely financed from the national government budget. Additional funding is obtained from EU programmes, fees paid for hunting and fishing permits, rents etc.. 5 NHS manages all the state-owned PAs • 37 national parks Forest land in managed forests • 19 strict nature reserves Poorly productive land • 7 national hiking areas • 12 wilderness areas Protected areas (NHS) • almost 500 other PAs • public water areas Public water areas (NHS) Altogether over 7 million hectares, 18% of Finland’s surface area 6 Finland´s National Parks • a total of 37 national parks • 9 790 km2 • 2,1 million visits in 2012 7 Visitor Centres • guidance for hikers and other customer service • exhibitions and audiovisual shows • interpretation and environmental education • 887 700 visits Organisation of National Heritage Services 1.1.2012 9 Contents of the Presentation • Protected areas in Finland • Development of visitor monitoring and information system in Finland and current practices • Use of visitor information • Future development Why visitor monitoring in protected areas? “Any phenomenon that is not measured and reported does not exist politically. Governments, societies, communities and individuals place more value on that which is documented.“ 11 Development of outdoor recreation data base systems in NHS Year Action 2000 Standardised surveys start and the first manual on visitor monitoring was published in Finland (FFRI=METLA & NHS) 2002 MMV I (Austria) 2004 MMV II (Finland), Reiska GIS was launched in NHS 2005 Nordic and Baltic Project on Developing Visitor Monitoring Methodology 2006 MMV III (Switzerland), ASTA database was launched in NHS 2007 Manual of Visitor Monitoring in Nature Areas was published in Nordic and Baltic countries 2008 MMV IV (Italy), ASTA database was sold to Estonia (RMK ) 2010 MMV V (Netherlands), first economic impacts of park visitation report was published in Finland (FFRI & NHS) 2011 Customer segmentation based on motivations (UEF & NHS) 2012 MMV VI (Sweden) 12 2013 Questions on experienced health and wellbeing benefits (multiple research organisations); ASTA information to SASS International cooperation in developing visitor monitoring methodology The main focus is on practical matters: • how to carry out visitor counting and visitor surveys, • how to report the results and • how to make use of the information obtained. The manual (TemaNord 2007:534 ) includes • guidelines, • recommendations, • tips and examples on visitor monitoring methodologies 13 The project • Nordic-Baltic Workshop in June 2004 in Rovaniemi, Finland − common project to develop Nordic and Baltic guidelines for visitor monitoring • Projects 2005 and 2006-2007 • Funding from the Nordic Council of Ministers and Naturvårdsverket • Implementation by a project group that consisted of representatives of both management and research organisations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. • project management in Metsähallitus workshop in November 2009 in Rovaniemi 14 How has the manual been utilised? • Translations into Swedish, Estonian, Finnish and partly into Norwegian (the model questions, app .4) • Adopting the manual into active use in the Nordic and Baltic countries? 15 Visitor monitoring • Means all the different counting and survey exercises that are implemented in order to obtain systematic, repeated and reliable information about visitors and/or visits which is comparable across time. Visitor surveys Visitor counting Visitor information 16 ASTA - the visitor information system of NHS CONTINUOUS FEEDBACK AT SURVEYS AT •Visitor centers •Protected and •Outdoors.fi-webpages recreational areas •Visitor centers •Nature tourism enterprises •Nature tourism enterprises with cooperation agreement, annually VISITS AT •Protected and recreational areas •Visitor centers •Outdoors.fi-webpages 17 ASTA • Ensures that data is stored permanentely in a uniform manner • Parallel to the development of ASTA visitor information system and Nordic-Baltic visitor monitoring manual, guidelines for data gathering, management and reporting in NHS were developed • internal electric document -> easy to keep up to date • The organisation change leading to a matrix organisation occurred about the same time Allowed for developing a network of ASTA specialists 18 Organisation of National Heritage Services 1.1.2012 19 ASTA – steering personnel 1. Technical contact person in NHS: Mikko Pukkila 2. National coordinator: Development of the system and guidelines for using it: Hannamaria Potila 3. National reporting development: Martti Aarnio; together with the Estonians’ KÜSI 4.-9.: Regional coordination, e.g. support for users and training, checking the data quality Liisa Kajala and Carina Wennström (Southern Finland) Veikko Virkkunen and Minna Koramo (Ostrobothnia) Joel Erkkonen and Erkki Ollila (Lapland) • In the regions, there is one person from SMART network and one from VICSU network • In sharing the responsiblities for the system maintenance and updates, these specialties are taken into account 20 ASTA – four user types 1. Main users (9) • The steering personnel 2. Users with broad rights of establishing new surveys and visitor counts (138) • Senior advisors, planners and customer service personnel in park regions 3. Users with rights to enter data (95) • Field workers entering counter countings • Temporary employees entering e.g. visitor survey responses 4. Users with reporting rights (24) • Directors, central unit personnel etc. Altogether 266 users, no license fees 21 ASTA – annual clock • Continuous data entry so that by 15th of each month , the data of the previous month is entered • Annual figures in ASTA by Jan. 15th • The regional ASTA coordinators (2/region) check data of their region • The national coordinator produces national figures for annual reporting purposes • The national coordinator produces mid-term reporting at the end of August 22 ASTA – Minimum requirements for data collection in protected areas • Visitor surveys in protected areas • Every five years in all the national parks (37) and state hiking areas (7) + some other significant areas on average 8,8 surveys / year • Continuous visitor counting • At least during the seasons 23 ASTA – Minimum requirements for data collection in visitor centers • Surveys in visitor centers • Every five years • Continuous counting • Either manually or with electronic counters • Continuous feedback • Information on guided groups, including: • # of customers • Type of group • Type of environmental interpretation given 24 The current amount of data in ASTA, examples Protected areas • 124 visitor surveys since year 2000 • More than 45 000 survey responses • 364 electronic counters currently in use Visitor centers • 49 surveys since year 2000 • Close to 16 000 survey responses • 41 152 continuous feedback responses from nature centers Cooperation with entrepreneurs • 22 entrepreneur surveys • 528 survey responses 25 Contents of the Presentation • Protected areas in Finland • Development of visitor monitoring and information system in Finland and current practices • Use of visitor information • Future development Use of visitor information − At all the levels from annual goals set by the ministries to local decision making, management planning, communication etc. − Ensuring sustainability: principles of sustainable nature tourism in protected areas, indicators largely based on visitor information − Local economic impacts − Health benefits − Visitor profiles − Using the data broadly and openly ensures that the regions want to produce best possible data − Integration into other data base systems ensures maximum usage At an area level: Visitor survey reports published for each area 28 Results at an area level Visitor type n % Length of stay (for overnight visitors in days, for day visitors in hours) Average Median Mode Min Max Day visitor 279 90 3,1 3 2 0 15 Men 122 44 3,3 0 10 Women 142 51 2,8 0 8 Overnight visitor 30 10 2,8 2 1 1 15 Men 17 57 2,7 1 15 Women 13 43 3,0 1 12 Total 309 29 Utilisation of ASTA, comparisons at different levels Whole Kurjenrahka Southern country NP 2007 Finland 2007 2007 Importance of the protected n % n % n % area your trip´s only or the most important 244 90 1 689 65 2 163 62 destination one among other intended 16 6 712 27 1 017 29 destinations a non-planned destination along your 11 4 207 8 299 9 route Total 271 100 2 608 100 3 479 100 30 National demand statistics from ASTA Visitors 2010 2011 2012 Number of visits in visitor centres and customer 941 500 915 400 971 900 service points Number of visits in national parks (37) 1 958 500 2 086 500 2 087 300 Number of visits in national hiking areas (7) 364 000 356 000 354 000 Number of visitors in groups using NHS 62 100 61 900 74 200 interpretation services Average visitor satisfaction (scale1-5) 4,24 4,30 4,24 31 Number of visits to national parks and visitor centers 32 The most popular national parks are part of the appeal of the tourist destinations Number of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Koli National Park • Location: Joensuu, Kontiolahti, Lieksa • 30 Km2 • Established: 1991
    Koli National Park • Location: Joensuu, Kontiolahti, Lieksa • 30 km2 • Established: 1991 Metsähallitus, Parks and Wildlife Finland • Ukko Visitor Centre, Ylä-Kolintie, Koli, tel. + 358 (0)206 39 5654 [email protected] • nationalparks.fi/koli • facebook.com/ kolinkansallispuisto National Park Please help us to protect nature: • Please respect nature and other hikers! Koli • Leave no traces of your visit behind. Safely combustible wastes can be burnt at campfire sites. into one of Finland’s national Metsähallitus manages Please take any other wastes away landscapes. The best loved cultural landscapes within the when you leave the park. vistas open up vellous view over national park, at the same time Light campfires is allowed in the Lake Pielinen from the top of preserving traditional farming • sites provided in the camping When you take in the mar- Ukko-Koli hill, it’s easy to see methods. Swidden fields are areas marked on the map. Lighting vellous view over Lake why this spot has attracted so cleared and burnt in the park’s campfires is forbidden if the forest many Finnish artists, photog- forests, meadows are mown by Pielinen from the top of fire warning is in effect. Ukko-Koli hill, it’s easy to see raphers and nature-lovers over hand, and cattle graze the park’s • You may freely walk, ski and row, in why this spot has attracted the centuries. The splendid pastures. scenery always instills a sense of the park, except in restricted areas. so many Finnish artists, serenity and wonder in visitors. Hilltops and meadows • Please keep pets on lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfats-2007 -Junior-Ranger-Project
    Junior Ranger Project in Europe In partnership to protect Europe’s natural and cultural heritage Report of Study Visits 2008 provided by the Alfred Toepfer Natural Heritage Scholarship 2007, awarded by the EUROPARC Federation and funded by the Alfred Toepfer Foundation F.V.S. of Hamburg, Germany Mgr. Kv ěta Černohlávková [email protected] Czech Republic Acknowledgements Many thanks to the EUROPARC Federation and the Alfred Toepfer Foundation F.V.S. of Hamburg for this outstanding opportunity to visit these protected areas in Europe and to meet all the marvellous people. Thank you for their kind support given to me. Thanks a lot to the Peak District National Park Authority in England. Thanks to Peter Townsend and also to professional rangers Gordon Danks, Terry Page and to the mentor of Youth Rangers Sally Kempson. Many thanks to the Šumava National Park Authority in the Czech Republic. Thanks to the chief of ranger service, Jan Konvi čka, and to the professional ranger Lucie M ěstková. Thanks a lot to the Harz National Park Authority in Germany. Thanks to the coordinator of Junior Ranger Project, Sandra Meckbach-Wolter, and also to professional rangers Bernd Bay, Hermann Zawadski and Alexander Ehrig. Many thanks to the Triglav National Park Authority in Slovenia. Thanks to the chief of ranger service, Martin Šolar, and to the interpretation officer and mountain guide of the Triglav National Park Edvin Kravanja. Many thanks to the Prealpi Giulie Nature Park Authority in Italy. Thanks to the mentor of Junior Rangers, Verdiana Camilla Morandi, and to the nature guide Marco Favalli.
    [Show full text]
  • The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia, Norway, Rein Midteng
    The Horseshoe of Fennoscandia-A corridor for the long term survival of old-growth forest dependent species in Norway, Sweden and Finland. Rein Midteng, Asplan Viak. Norway. [email protected] 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? 2. What is its ecologial function? 3. Which subparts does it consist of? 4.Transboundary zones 5. How continuous and broad is the Horseshoe? 6. Key regions and areas in need of protection 7. Futher emphazis Un-protected old-growth forest in Pasvik 1.What is the Horseshoe of Fennoskandia? • Its a more or less continously corridor of old-growth forests from southern Finland/southeast Karealia to southern Norway/Sweden. • It consists of four subparts that are connected as a whole. These four subparts are although presented individually. In addition, it exists so called transboundary zones, which are “green” corridors with mostly continuously old-growth forests that stretch out from the Horseshoe. • Old-growth forests dominate the Horseshoe while in the rest of Fennoscandia culture forests dominate. • It consist of both protected and unprotected old-growth forests. • It includes a great variation of vegetationzones and foresttypes. • It is of major importance in the implementation of the Nagaya goals • It is of major importance for the preservation of old-growth forest species in Norway, Sweden, Finland and probably also in some parts of Russia. 2. What is its (ecologial) function? • It is a migrationzone east-west (since the last ice age), and the Fennoscandinavian countries share therefore to a large extent the same flora and fauna as Russia (low level of endemism). • It provides an exchange of species, individuals and genes to and forth in the Horseshoe.
    [Show full text]
  • Koli National Park: Eden Revisited?
    Metsäntutkimuslaitos- Finnish Forest Research Institute Kolin kansallispuisto – Koli National Park KOLI NATIONAL PARK: EDEN REVISITED? Visitor´s first experience of Koli landscape; a feminist - geographical approach Matthew Sawatzky University of Joensuu Department of Geography Master’s thesis June 2004 2 RESEARCH STATEMENT UNIVERSITY OF JOENSUU In today’s modern world our connection to the spiritual world has become increasingly marginalised. Science has separated the majority of people from the spiritual landscapes of the natural world. The hills of the Koli region in eastern Finland have traditionally been a sacred place but today they are part of national park and a modern tourist destination with a high level of infrastructure. The purpose of this study is to determine what the spiritual significance of the Koli hills is to the first time visitor. The gendered elements of the landscapes within the park are focused upon through the use of feminist theory. Both extensive and intensive methods were used in the project. A survey consisting of five open-ended questions was distributed to 50 University of Joensuu students from around the world, in depth discussions with three Finns and two modified commented walks were used during this project. The results of this work suggest that Koli is still a sacred place and that there are both masculine and feminine elements in the landscapes of the park. It also found that visiting Koli is largely an individual experience even though many of the individual responses support contemporary feminist thought. Author: Matthew Sawatzky Student number: 157730 The title of the research: Koli National Park: Eden Revisited? Faculty/Subject: Faculty of Social Sciences/ Human Geography Pages: 86 Time: June 2004 Key words: landscapes, spiritual, sacred, feminism, gender Box 1053 Lac du Bonnet, Manitoba R0E 1A0 Canada 3 CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the Number of Visits to National Parks in Finland
    UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Forest Economics Factors affecting the number of visits to National Parks in Finland Master's thesis Forest Economics and Policy Anna Vanhatalo December 2009 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO ⎯ HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET ⎯ UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI Tiedekunta/Osasto ⎯ Fakultet/Sektion ⎯ Faculty Laitos ⎯ Institution ⎯ Department Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Forest Economics Tekijä ⎯ Författare ⎯ Author Vanhatalo, Anna Maria Työn nimi ⎯ Arbetets titel ⎯ Title Factors affecting the number of visits to national parks in Finland Oppiaine ⎯Läroämne ⎯ Subject Forest Economics and Policy Työn laji ⎯ Arbetets art ⎯ Level Aika ⎯ Datum ⎯ Month and year Sivumäärä ⎯ Sidoantal ⎯ Number of pages Master's thesis December 2009 62 + appendixes Tiivistelmä ⎯ Referat ⎯ Abstract Outdoor recreation and nature-based tourism have increased during the last ten years. In addition, the interest towards national parks has grown, which can be seen also as an increasing trend in the development of the number of visits to national parks. The aim of this thesis is to explain the cross-sectional variation in the visitation data representing different parks and hiking areas. Another aim is to explore the question of why the visitation in national parks has increased in Finland. These questions are studied separately for the national parks and hiking areas, because the development of the number of visits in national parks and hiking areas has been different. In addition, the separation is made also between Southern Finland and Northern Finland due to for example the size differences and close link of the national parks in Northern Finland with the ski-resort centers. Explanatory factors are divided into supply side factors (services inside and outside the park) and demand side factors (economic and demographics factors).
    [Show full text]
  • FINLAND State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in Finland
    COUNTRY REPORT ON THE STATE OF PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE FINLAND State of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in Finland Second Finnish National Report Merja Vetel¨ainen M°arten Huld´en Tuula Pehu (compilers) November 6, 2008 Note by FAO This Country Report has been prepared by the national authorities in the context of the preparatory process for the Second Report on the State of World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. The Report is being made available by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) as requested by the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. However, the report is solely the responsibility of the national authorities. The information in this report has not been verified by FAO, and the opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views or policy of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. CONTENTS ABSTRACT 6 INTRODUCTION TO FINLAND AND ITS AGRICULTURAL SECTOR 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Report
    Monthly Activity Log September The start of September is where the orientation activities began. I attend the Aalto party with other UST exchange students and introduced myself to some people in my tutor group. I played games at booths and learnt about the different clubs and societies. With my tutor group I joined Mursujaiset (image on the left)- an event that lasts for 24 hours, the purpose is to officially inaugurate the freshmen (referred to as ‘Mursu’) The day was filled with “interesting” performances, team bonding games and other traditions. Not even sure how to explain the day. I stayed for the first 15 hours and all I can say is that it was a memorable Aalto exchange experience. Even if you can’t stay for the full 24 hours, make sure you’re there for the first 12 hours! I also participated in a 5km run, as someone who is not sporty the run was surprisingly quite fun, and the route was scenic. During the first period (September to Mid-October) I took 3 courses that had quite a heavy workload. The weather is great in September so be sure to go outside and soak up the sun! Sibelius Monument – Mursujaiset 5km Run Aalto Party October After finishing classes from period 1, I had 3 exams that took up the full exam week. During the study break, I went to Oodi Helsinki Library to study, the library is very homey and has amazing interior designs. On the weekend I went with other exchange students to Nuuksio National Park. The national park is closest to the city and is most convenient to get there.
    [Show full text]
  • Excursion Guide
    Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 50 FOREGS 2002, Espoo, Finland Excursion Guide 6 - 7 September, 2002 South-western Finland - geology and history Geological Survey of Finland Espoo 2002 Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 50 FOREGS 2002, Espoo, Finland Excursion Guide 6-7 September, 2002 South-western Finland - geology and history Geological Survey of Finland Espoo 2002 Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 50 FOREGS 2002, Espoo, Finland Excursion Guide 6-7 September, 2002 South-western Finland - geology and history Compiled by Boris Saltikoff with contributions by Maija Haavisto-Hyvärinen, Matti Saarnisto, Seppo 1. Lahti, Matti Pajunen, Reijo Alviola, Lennart Lauren, Gerhard Hakkarainen, Carl-Göran Sten Geological Survey of Finland Espoo 2002 Boris SaItikoff (comp.) 2002: FOREGS 2002, Excursion Guide 6- 7 September, 2002. South-western Finland - geology and history. Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 50, 32 pages, 22 figures. The publication describes the sights of geological and historical interest along a two-day route in south­ western Finland, between Helsinki and Parainen. Described are bronze Age cairn in Meilahti, Helsinki, orbicular granitoid occurrence in Nuuksio, Espoo, the Nuuksio National Park, migmatites and the migmatite gneiss in Nummenkylä, Vihti, Salpausselkä end formation, Ojakkala, Vihti, limestone deposit and quarry, Parainen, tantalum pegmatite, Kemiö, Raadesuo peat bog, Kisko, Orijärvi copper mine, Kisko, Fiskars ironworks, Pohja. Abrief description of the geology and history of Finland is given in the introduction. Key words: geology, bedrock, glacial geology, mining industry, history, field trips, guidebook, Uusimaa, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland Boris SaltikojJ Geological Survey 0/ Finland Betonimiehenkuja 4 02150 ESPOO, Finland E-mail: boris.saltikoff@gsUi ISBN 951-690-838-1 ISSN 0781-643X Vamrnalan Kirjapaino Oy 2002 Contents List of illustrations Background - some facts about Finland ...
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Management in Finnish National Parks
    Out of the Woods: Crisis Management in Finnish National Parks Heidi Painilainen Bachelor’s Thesis Degree Programme in Tourism 2011 Abstract Degree programme in tourism Author or authors Group or year Heidi Painilainen of entry Autumn 2007 Title of report Number of Out of the Woods: Crisis Management in Finnish National pages and Parks appendices 56 + 5 Teacher/s or supervisor/s Eva Holmberg, Annika Konttinen The objective of this thesis was to study the crisis management of Finnish national parks. In practice this involves assessing the possible crises that could actually occur in the national parks, how these could be prevented and, finally, what kinds of tools are used for managing these. The theoretical framework of the study introduces crisis management, life-cycle of crisis and national park management. To get a closer look at the national parks, five case studies of different Finnish national parks were conducted. The chosen nation- al parks include Archipelago National Park, Oulanka National Park, Pallas- Yllästunturi National Park, Patvinsuo National Park and Päijänne National Park. These parks were selected since they represent different locations, sizes, environ- mental features and, therefore, also potential crises. The approach of the study is qualitative and the semi-structured interview was cho- sen as the main method of research. A representative of each selected national park was interviewed individually. The interviews resulted in five 29–55 minute recorded conversations which were subsequently transcribed for the purpose of analysis. The interviews were conducted in February 2011 and four of them were executed by Skype due to the long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Park Management and Its Effectiveness
    8 Park Management and its Effectiveness Sections 8 and 9 of this report will examine the Natural Heritage Services mission and effectiveness of Metsähallitus’s management of vision for 2010 the protected areas under its administration by considering how well objectives have been The mission of the NHS has been defined as achieved, and assessing the benefits obtained follows: through management in relation to the resources – We manage our national parks and other used. The review will largely examine overall out- areas according to best practices based comes in relation to total resource use and moni- on research and experience, to preserve toring records showing how working hours are biodiversity and cultural values. allocated between the core processes that fulfill – We provide our customers with possibili- the main tasks of the Natural Heritage Services ties to enjoy recreation in and learn about (NHS). In relation to tasks especially relevant in nature. reaching goals set by society, there will be a focus – We create opportunities for nature tour- also on cost-effectiveness and productivity. These ism and sustainable regional develop- key tasks assigned to the NHS include: ment. – establishing of protected areas – We collaborate with many partners na- – surveying of natural and cultural values tionally and internationally. – planning of the management and use of – We work to improve our service capacity protected areas and the productivity and effectiveness of – restoring and managing habitats our activities. – providing facilities and services for hikers and other customers. This mission emphasises basic values shared throughout society: nature conservation and eco- This review is based on the concept of adaptive logical, cultural, social and economic sustainabil- planning and management of protected areas and ity in the use of natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar List - page 1/55 The List of Wetlands of International Importance Published 21 October 2020 The Ramsar List was established in response to Article 2.1 of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), which reads: “Each Contracting Party shall designate suitable wetlands within its territory for inclusion in a List of Wetlands of International Importance, hereinafter referred to as ‘the List’ which is maintained by the bureau [secretariat of the Convention] established under Article 8.” Wetlands included in the List acquire a new status at the national level and are recognized by the international community as being of significant value not only for the country, or the countries, in which they are located, but for humanity as a whole. The Convention establishes that “wetlands should be selected for the List on account of their international significance in terms of ecology, botany, zoology, limnology or hydrology.” Over the years, the Conference of the Contracting Parties has adopted more specific criteria interpreting the Convention text, as well as an Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands and a Classification system of wetland type. All issues pertaining to the Ramsar List were encapsulated in Resolution VII.11 adopted by the Conference of the Parties in May 1999 and entitled Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance1, which has been frequently updated. Everything in the Strategic Framework is founded upon this “Vision for the Ramsar List”: “To develop and maintain an international network of wetlands which are important for the conservation of global biological diversity and for sustaining human life through the ecological and hydrological functions they perform.” Full data submitted by the Parties for each of their Ramsar Sites, with one-paragraph descriptions of each site, are entered in the Ramsar Sites Information Service (rsis.ramsar.org).
    [Show full text]