DOCSLIB.ORG

PODCASTING IMPLEMENTATION in PUBLIC RADIO a Thesis Presented

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PODCASTING IMPLEMENTATION in PUBLIC RADIO a Thesis Presented PODCASTING IMPLEMENTATION IN PUBLIC RADIO A thesis presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Rachel M. Ward March 2007 This thesis entitled PODCASTING IMPLEMENTATION IN PUBLIC RADIO by RACHEL M. WARD has been approved for the School of Telecommunications and the Scripps College of Communication by Gregory D. Newton Assistant Professor of School of Telecommunications Gregory J. Shepherd Dean, Scripps College of Communication Abstract WARD, RACHEL M., M.A., March 2007, Telecommunications PODCASTING IMPLEMENTATION IN PUBLIC RADIO (86 pp.) Director of Thesis: Gregory D. Newton New technologies present both opportunities and challenges to public broadcasters. This thesis examines how one such technology, podcasting, is being broached by public radio broadcasters in the United States. An overview of public broadcasting and podcasting is provided. A survey was conducted to measure the perception of podcasting among public radio broadcasters, in keeping with diffusion of innovations theory. Three factors from diffusion theory, complexity, compatibility, and relative advantage were found to shape broadcasters' perceptions of podcasting. Two other attributes, social approval/communicability and cost are proposed for future research. A positive relationship between membership in the National Public Radio network and adoption of podcasting is found. Recommendations for implementing a pilot system of paid podcasting are shared. Approved: Gregory D. Newton Assistant Professor of School of Telecommunications Acknowledgments Many thanks are due to the members of my thesis committee, Dr. Duncan Brown, Dr. Don Flournoy, for their advice and encouragement in pursuing this work, and to Dr. Greg Newton, my thesis chair, who dedicated considerable time and energy to this project. Thanks also go to my other professors in the Department of Telecommunications, Dr. Roger Cooper, Dr. Norma Pecora, Dr. Mia Consalvo and Dr. Charles “Buzz” Clift, for their enrichment of my program of study. Robert Spier of NPR Digital Media offered valuable assistance in approaching respondents. Debbie Nogrady, Paula Carpenter and Travis Funk offered logistical support that kept this project on track. I would also like to thank the housemates at 240 East State Street, and my fellow public broadcasting students, Nancy Cole, Melissa Hendricks and Erin Doppes O’Brien for making my graduate experience so rich. Thanks go to Rusty Smith, Bryan Gibson, Sara Magee and the staff and students of the newsroom at WOUB, and to Meegan White at APTS, for their support of my career in public broadcasting. Dr. Bruce Lytle, Dr. Eric Roselli, Father Young, and the doctors and nurses of the Cleveland Clinic cardiac ICU unknowingly contributed to this project. Personal thanks go to my parents, Rita Mendl and David Ward, my sisters, Becky and Sarah Ward, and my grandparents, Mildred Morgan Ward, Bob Ward, Cecilia Hirsch Mendl and John Mendl. Finally I would like to thank the Benson-Ganze-Smith family for opening their family and their home to me in generous support of this project. The completion of this thesis is owed to them. 5 Table of Contents Page Abstract...........................................................................................................................3 Acknowledgments...........................................................................................................4 List of Tables ..................................................................................................................8 List of Figures.................................................................................................................9 Chapter 1: Introduction.................................................................................................10 Overview...................................................................................................................10 Funding public radio..................................................................................................11 Public broadcasting institutions .................................................................................14 Public radio’s mission ...............................................................................................15 Public broadcasting and digital technologies..............................................................16 Podcasting.................................................................................................................17 Creating podcasts ......................................................................................................18 Distributing podcasts…………………..……………..……………………………….19 Accessing podcasts…………………………………………………………………....19 Video podcasting.......................................................................................................20 The public podcasting model.....................................................................................21 Challenges associated with podcasting.......................................................................23 Chapter 2: Review of the Literature...............................................................................27 Research questions and hypotheses............................................................................27 Overview: Diffusion of innovation ...........................................................................27 6 Attributes of innovations ...........................................................................................31 Relative advantage ....................................................................................................32 Compatibility ............................................................................................................32 Trialability.................................................................................................................33 Observability.............................................................................................................34 Complexity................................................................................................................35 Other perceived attributes..........................................................................................36 Chapter 3: Methodology and Results ............................................................................ 38 Methodology .............................................................................................................38 Survey design............................................................................................................39 Recruiting participants...............................................................................................40 Results: RQ1 .............................................................................................................41 Results: RQ2 and RQ3 ..............................................................................................44 Discussion: RQ1........................................................................................................45 Discussion: RQ2 and RQ3.........................................................................................50 Factor 1: Compatibility.............................................................................................50 Factor 2: Complexity and trialability ........................................................................52 Factor 3: Relative advantage.....................................................................................54 Suggestions for future study ......................................................................................55 Hypotheses................................................................................................................57 Limitations ................................................................................................................58 Summary...................................................................................................................61 Chapter 4: Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................. 62 7 Conclusions...............................................................................................................62 Podcasting and the future of public radio...................................................................63 Membership ..............................................................................................................65 Providing content ......................................................................................................67 Protecting content......................................................................................................68 Disseminating funds ..................................................................................................69 References.....................................................................................................................73 Appendices....................................................................................................................80 Appendix A: Podcasting at public radio stations survey.............................................80 Appendix B: Rotated component matrix....................................................................85 Appendix C: IRB approval form………………………………………………………86 8 List of Tables Table Page 3.1: Cross
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2017 Corporation for Public Broadcasting Station Activities Survey | Telling Public Radio’S Story | Station: KSOR
    2017 Corporation for Public Broadcasting Station Activities Survey | Telling Public Radio’s Story | Station: KSOR 1. Describe your overall goals and approach to address identified community issues, needs, and interests through your station’s vital local services, such as multiplatform long and short-form content, digital and in-person engagement, education services, community information, partnership support, and other activities, and audiences you reached or new audiences you engaged. Each day Jefferson Public Radio (JPR) explores the issues, needs and interests of its listeners through its news, music and cultural programming. JPR’s local news department actively identifies issues of public importance and creates programs and multi-platform content designed to address these issues. JPR’s fact-based approach to addressing community issues embraces the highest journalistic standards for accuracy, fairness and balance with the goal of stimulating constructive civic discourse about topics of public importance. During the past year key local services and engagement activities included: • Conducted in-depth interviews with over 1,000 different sources and engaged over 2,500 different JPR listeners in an interactive discussion about regional civic issues on its daily public affairs program, The Jefferson Exchange. • Produced and broadcast in-depth, contextual news features that explored issues of community importance and interest. These features aired during local cutaways of NPR’s Morning Edition and contained over 300 different independent sources. • Produced and broadcast nearly 800 regional newscasts, reporting on the state legislatures of both Oregon and California as well as other local government bodies. • Produced, broadcast and disseminated via digital/social media platforms over 50 interviews and live musical performances featuring regional and touring musicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Ownership Rules
    05-Sadler.qxd 2/3/2005 12:47 PM Page 101 5 MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES It is the purpose of this Act, among other things, to maintain control of the United States over all the channels of interstate and foreign radio transmission, and to provide for the use of such channels, but not the ownership thereof, by persons for limited periods of time, under licenses granted by Federal author- ity, and no such license shall be construed to create any right, beyond the terms, conditions, and periods of the license. —Section 301, Communications Act of 1934 he Communications Act of 1934 reestablished the point that the public airwaves were “scarce.” They were considered a limited and precious resource and T therefore would be subject to government rules and regulations. As the Supreme Court would state in 1943,“The radio spectrum simply is not large enough to accommodate everybody. There is a fixed natural limitation upon the number of stations that can operate without interfering with one another.”1 In reality, the airwaves are infinite, but the govern- ment has made a limited number of positions available for use. In the 1930s, the broadcast industry grew steadily, and the FCC had to grapple with the issue of broadcast station ownership. The FCC felt that a diversity of viewpoints on the airwaves served the public interest and was best achieved through diversity in station ownership. Therefore, to prevent individuals or companies from controlling too many broadcast stations in one area or across the country, the FCC eventually instituted ownership rules. These rules limit how many broadcast stations a person can own in a single market or nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Community Fy15
    REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY F Y15 INSPIRING A SMARTER WORLD Dear Friends, FY 2015 was a year of challenges and great opportunities, and a turning point in KCTS 9’s 60-year history. I am happy to share that the year has been a success. Your support has allowed us to meet our goal of providing meaningful content that is relevant to our community—on air, online and in person. The media landscape has changed dramatically in recent years, with fundamental changes in the way audiences choose and view content. Today, more than one in three visitors to KCTS9.org use a tablet or mobile device to connect with us. Five years ago, that figure was less than 5 percent. With new tools and technologies, the public has become actively involved in the creation, selection and distribution of content. We live in a world where time-shifted viewing, streaming video, tablets and smartphones have profoundly changed how audiences consume and share content. How does a public media organization stand out when, with today’s technology, everyone is a media company? We met this challenge by launching an initiative to produce innovative digital offerings that broaden the content we provide and the platforms on which we provide it. While staying true to our mission to inspire a smarter world, we shifted to a digital-first strategy. We are committed to creating, commissioning and curating local content with a continued adherence to the public-media beliefs that have defined KCTS 9 for 60 years. In FY 2015, we brought you live public dialogues including political debates and election coverage; a current affairs series that explores in depth stories from across the Northwest; local specials on environmental issues; community events that celebrate our diverse cultures; and educational programming that is free and accessible to all.
    [Show full text]
  • PBS and the Young Adult Viewer Tamara Cherisse John [email protected]
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Spring 4-12-2012 PBS and the Young Adult Viewer Tamara Cherisse John [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp Recommended Citation John, Tamara Cherisse, "PBS and the Young Adult Viewer" (2012). Research Papers. Paper 218. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp/218 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PBS AND THE YOUNG ADULT VIEWER by Tamara John B.A., Radio-Television, Southern Illinois University, 2010 B.A., Spanish, Southern Illinois University, 2010 A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Degree Department of Mass Communication and Media Arts in the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2012 RESEARCH PAPER APPROVAL PBS AND THE YOUNG ADULT VIEWER By Tamara John A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the field of Professional Media and Media Management Approved by: Dr. Paul Torre, Chair Dr. Beverly Love Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale March 28, 2012 AN ABSTRACT OF THE RESEARCH PAPER OF Tamara John, for the Master of Science degree in Professional Media and Media Management, presented on March 28, 2012, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: PBS AND THE YOUNG ADULT VIEWER MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr. Paul Torre Attracting and retaining teenage and young adult viewers has been a major challenge for most broadcasters.
    [Show full text]
  • And Lots of Dx!
    The Official Publication of the Worldwide TV-FM DX Association SEPTEMBER 2007 The Magazine for TV and FM DXers PACK UP THE CAR WITH ANTENNAS AND RADIOS, KISS THE WIFE AND KIDS GOOD-BYE, LOAD UP THE CAR WITH YOUR BUDDIES AND DRIVE 900 MILES TO A CABIN IN A PLACE SO REMOTE IT’S A 100 MI ROUND TRIP TO THE DAIRY QUEEN AND BACK. PEACE, QUIET AND DX!! Keosauqua, Iowa, July 2007 17 CONVENTION 2007 IS HISTORY! MONTHS MAJOR TROPO HITS THE MIDWEST REMAINING UNTIL ANALOG TV SHUTOFF AM AND FM IBOC GET THE OFFICIAL TH START ON SEPTEMBER 14 . AND LOTS OF DX! TV and FM DXing was never so much fun! THE WORLDWIDE TV-FM DX ASSOCIATION Serving the UHF-VHF Enthusiast THE VHF-UHF DIGEST IS THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE WORLDWIDE TV-FM DX ASSOCIATION DEDICATED TO THE OBSERVATION AND STUDY OF THE PROPAGATION OF LONG DISTANCE TELEVISION AND FM BROADCASTING SIGNALS AT VHF AND UHF. WTFDA IS GOVERNED BY A BOARD OF DIRECTORS: DOUG SMITH, GREG CONIGLIO, BRUCE HALL, KEITH McGINNIS AND MIKE BUGAJ. Editor and publisher: Mike Bugaj Treasurer: Keith McGinnis wtfda.org Webmaster: Tim McVey wtfda.info Site Administrator: Chris Cervantez Editorial Staff: Dave Williams, Jeff Kruszka, Keith McGinnis, Fred Nordquist, Nick Langan, Doug Smith, Chris Kadlec, Peter Baskind and John Zondlo, Our website: www.wtfda.org; Our forums: www.wtfda.info SEPTEMBER 2007 _______________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS Page Two 2 Mailbox 3 TV News…Doug Smith 4 Finally! For those of you online with an email FM News 12 address, we now offer a quick, convenient and Northern FM DX…Keith McGinnis 20 secure way to join or renew your membership Southern FM DX…John Zondlo 42 in the WTFDA from our page at: Western TV DX…Dave Williams 46 http://fmdx.usclargo.com/join.html Eastern TV DX…Nick Langan 51 Photo News…Jeff Kruszka 55 Dues are $25 if paid to our Paypal account.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clear Picture on Clear Channel Communications, Inc.: a Corporate Profile
    Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Articles and Chapters ILR Collection 1-28-2004 The Clear Picture on Clear Channel Communications, Inc.: A Corporate Profile Maria C. Figueroa Cornell University, [email protected] Damone Richardson Cornell University, [email protected] Pam Whitefield Cornell University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons, Arts Management Commons, and the Unions Commons Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR. Support this valuable resource today! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the ILR Collection at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. If you have a disability and are having trouble accessing information on this website or need materials in an alternate format, contact [email protected] for assistance. The Clear Picture on Clear Channel Communications, Inc.: A Corporate Profile Abstract [Excerpt] This research was commissioned by the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) with the expressed purpose of assisting the organization and its affiliate unions – which represent some 500,000 media and related workers – in understanding, more fully, the changes taking place in the arts and entertainment industry. Specifically, this report examines the impact that Clear Channel Communications, with its dominant positions in radio, live entertainment and outdoor advertising, has had on the industry in general, and workers in particular. Keywords AFL-CIO, media, worker, arts, entertainment industry, advertising, organization, union, marketplace, deregulation, federal regulators Disciplines Advertising and Promotion Management | Arts Management | Unions Comments Suggested Citation Figueroa, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ed Phelps Logs His 1,000 DTV Station Using Just Himself and His DTV Box. No Autologger Needed
    The Magazine for TV and FM DXers October 2020 The Official Publication of the Worldwide TV-FM DX Association Being in the right place at just the right time… WKMJ RF 34 Ed Phelps logs his 1,000th DTV Station using just himself and his DTV Box. No autologger needed. THE VHF-UHF DIGEST The Worldwide TV-FM DX Association Serving the TV, FM, 30-50mhz Utility and Weather Radio DXer since 1968 THE VHF-UHF DIGEST IS THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE WORLDWIDE TV-FM DX ASSOCIATION DEDICATED TO THE OBSERVATION AND STUDY OF THE PROPAGATION OF LONG DISTANCE TELEVISION AND FM BROADCASTING SIGNALS AT VHF AND UHF. WTFDA IS GOVERNED BY A BOARD OF DIRECTORS: DOUG SMITH, SAUL CHERNOS, KEITH MCGINNIS, JAMES THOMAS AND MIKE BUGAJ Treasurer: Keith McGinnis wtfda.org/info Webmaster: Tim McVey Forum Site Administrator: Chris Cervantez Creative Director: Saul Chernos Editorial Staff: Jeff Kruszka, Keith McGinnis, Fred Nordquist, Nick Langan, Doug Smith, John Zondlo and Mike Bugaj The WTFDA Board of Directors Doug Smith Saul Chernos James Thomas Keith McGinnis Mike Bugaj [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Renewals by mail: Send to WTFDA, P.O. Box 501, Somersville, CT 06072. Check or MO for $10 payable to WTFDA. Renewals by Paypal: Send your dues ($10USD) from the Paypal website to [email protected] or go to https://www.paypal.me/WTFDA and type 10.00 or 20.00 for two years in the box. Our WTFDA.org website webmaster is Tim McVey, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • AUDIENCE 98 Public Service, Public Support
    blank page AUDIENCE 98 Public Service, Public Support A project of Audience Research Analysis Funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting Leslie Peters, Editor AUDIENCE 98 Core Team David Giovannoni Leslie Peters Jay Youngclaus AudiGraphics® is a registered trademark of Audience Research Analysis. VALS™ is a registered trademark of SRI International. AUDIENCE 98® is a registered trademark of David Giovannoni, Audience Research Analysis, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Copyright © 1999 Corporation for Public Broadcasting 901 E Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 ii “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” - Albert Einstein iii blank page Table of Contents Foreword viii Acknowledgments ix 1. The Essential Findings of AUDIENCE 98 1 Public Service, Public Support 3 Fundamentals in Brief 4 2. Programming Causes Audience 7 A Community of Characters 9 3. Rounding Up the Usual Suspects 27 Public Radio’s Minority Audiences 29 Public Radio’s Generation X Audience 38 Public Radio’s Older Audience 48 Getting to More with the Concept of Core 52 4. The More Things Change... 57 A Question of Place 59 It Ain’t Net-cessarily So 64 Listening, More or Less 72 5. ...The More They Stay the Same 77 The Importance of Community Radio 79 6. Following the Money 89 Public Service Begets Public Support 91 The Value of Programming 95 7. Audience Volunteers Support 111 Givers 113 Giving 126 The Effect of On-Air Pledge Drives 130 Low Anxiety 145 Yield Not to Temptation 150 8. The Buck Stops Here 155 Public Service Economics 157 v Appendix 163 About AUDIENCE 98 165 How AUDIENCE 98 Links Listener Income to Listening 167 How AUDIENCE 98 Links Underwriting Income to Listening 169 What We Learned by Gathering Underwriting Information from Stations 170 Understanding the Giving Model 172 vi Foreword Sometimes research changes what we think.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Digital Television in Transition Between Japan and the U.S
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Kanayama, Tsutomu Conference Paper Broadcasting Policy and Regulation in transition before dawn of a New Paradigm: Comparing Digital Television in Transition between Japan and the U.S. 14th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society", Kyoto, Japan, 24th-27th June, 2017 Provided in Cooperation with: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Suggested Citation: Kanayama, Tsutomu (2017) : Broadcasting Policy and Regulation in transition before dawn of a New Paradigm: Comparing Digital Television in Transition between Japan and the U.S., 14th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society", Kyoto, Japan, 24th-27th June, 2017, International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/168497 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich
    [Show full text]
  • Fake TV News: Widespread and Undisclosed
    Fake TV News: Widespread and Undisclosed A multimedia report on television newsrooms’ use of material provided by PR firms on behalf of paying clients Diane Farsetta and Daniel Price, Center for Media and Democracy April 6, 2006 Center for Media and Democracy 520 University Ave., Suite 227 Madison, WI 53703 Phone: 608-260-9713 Fax: 608-260-9714 Website: www.prwatch.org Contents News Release - 2 Executive Summary - 4 Introduction - 9 Findings: Video News Releases - 14 Findings: TV Stations - 19 Findings: Corporations - 22 Recommendations - 26 Take Action - 32 Frequently Asked Questions - 33 Appendix A: About This Report - 39 Appendix B: VNRs in Detail - 40 1 News Release Press Advisory: New Report: Fake TV News Widespread and Undisclosed Investigation catches 77 local TV stations presenting corporate PR as real news Groups file complaints urging FCC to take action against deceptive broadcasters WASHINGTON The Center for Media Democracy and Free Press today exposed an epidemic of fake news infiltrating local television broadcasts across country. At a press conference in Washington with FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein, the groups called for a crackdown on stations that present corporate-sponsored videos as genuine news to an unsuspecting audience. CMD, which unveiled the results of a 10-month investigation, found scores of local stations slipping commercial “video news releases,” or VNRs, into their regular news programming. The new multimedia report released today includes footage of 36 separate VNRs and their broadcast as “news” by TV stations and networks nationwide, including those in the nation’s biggest markets. The full report -- “Fake TV News: Widespread and Undisclosed” -- is now available complete with VNR and TV station video footage at www.prwatch.org/fakenews/execsummary.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 and FY 2018
    Corporation for Public Broadcasting Appropriation Request and Justification FY2016 and FY2018 Submitted to the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee and the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee February 2, 2015 This document with links to relevant public broadcasting sites is available on our Web site at: www.cpb.org Table of Contents Financial Summary …………………………..........................................................1 Narrative Summary…………………………………………………………………2 Section I – CPB Fiscal Year 2018 Request .....……………………...……………. 4 Section II – Interconnection Fiscal Year 2016 Request.………...…...…..…..… . 24 Section III – CPB Fiscal Year 2016 Request for Ready To Learn ……...…...…..39 FY 2016 Proposed Appropriations Language……………………….. 42 Appendix A – Inspector General Budget………………………..……..…………43 Appendix B – CPB Appropriations History …………………...………………....44 Appendix C – Formula for Allocating CPB’s Federal Appropriation………….....46 Appendix D – CPB Support for Rural Stations …………………………………. 47 Appendix E – Legislative History of CPB’s Advance Appropriation ………..…. 49 Appendix F – Public Broadcasting’s Interconnection Funding History ….…..…. 51 Appendix G – Ready to Learn Research and Evaluation Studies ……………….. 53 Appendix H – Excerpt from the Report on Alternative Sources of Funding for Public Broadcasting Stations ……………………………………………….…… 58 Appendix I – State Profiles…...………………………………………….….…… 87 Appendix J – The President’s FY 2016 Budget Request...…...…………………131 0 FINANCIAL SUMMARY OF THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING’S (CPB) BUDGET REQUESTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/2018 FY 2018 CPB Funding The Corporation for Public Broadcasting requests a $445 million advance appropriation for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018. This is level funding compared to the amount provided by Congress for both FY 2016 and FY 2017, and is the amount requested by the Administration for FY 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter Of
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Children’s Television Programming Rules ) MB Docket No. 18-202 ) Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative ) MB Docket No. 17-105 REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: July 10, 2019 Released: July 12, 2019 Comment Date: (30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) Reply Comment Date: (60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements; Commissioners Rosenworcel and Starks dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................3 III. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................................10 A. Statutory Authority .........................................................................................................................10 B. The Current State of the Marketplace for Children’s Programming ..............................................11 C. Core Programming..........................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]