Impact Evaluation UNDP 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Impact Evaluation of selected interventions of livelihood and Economic Recovery Portfolio 1 Table of contents Contents Table of contents ..................................................................................................................... 1 Executive summary .................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 Evaluation Background ........................................................................................................ 9 Evaluation Audience ............................................................................................................ 9 Thematic area .................................................................................................................... 10 List of projects evaluated .................................................................................................. 12 Report structure ................................................................................................................ 17 Evaluation scope and objectives ........................................................................................... 18 Evaluation scope ................................................................................................................ 18 Evaluation Objectives ........................................................................................................ 18 Evaluation criteria .............................................................................................................. 19 Evaluation questions ......................................................................................................... 20 Evaluation approach and methods ....................................................................................... 21 Evaluation approach .......................................................................................................... 21 Stage 1 Define the Evaluation Frame work and establishing scope ........................... 21 Stage 2 Impact evaluation methodology: .................................................................... 21 Stage 3: Develop and pilot end-line questionnaire to evaluate the impacts ............. 22 Stage 4: Field Work activities ........................................................................................ 22 Stage 5 Conduct data analysis and prepare the impact evaluation report and presentation. ................................................................................................................. 24 Data sources....................................................................................................................... 24 Sample and sampling frame .............................................................................................. 25 1 Data-collection procedures and instruments .................................................................. 26 Field visits phase: ........................................................................................................... 26 Survey phase of beneficiary views: ............................................................................... 26 Phase of interviews of key persons: ............................................................................. 27 Reporting stage: ............................................................................................................ 27 Stakeholder participation .................................................................................................. 28 Performance standards ..................................................................................................... 28 Ethical considerations........................................................................................................ 29 Major limitations ............................................................................................................... 31 The general conclusions of the projects ............................................................................... 32 Strengths ............................................................................................................................ 32 Weaknesses ....................................................................................................................... 33 Lessons learned ................................................................................................................. 35 Governorates Details ............................................................................................................. 38 Aleppo Governorate .......................................................................................................... 38 Governorate Projects Analysis ...................................................................................... 38 Project evaluation information details ......................................................................... 39 ALHassakeh Governorate .................................................................................................. 68 Project evaluation information details ......................................................................... 68 Lattakia Governorate ....................................................................................................... 129 Project evaluation information details ....................................................................... 130 Deir-ez-Zor Governorate ................................................................................................. 173 Project evaluation information details ....................................................................... 174 Homs Governorate .......................................................................................................... 189 Project evaluation information details ....................................................................... 191 Hama Governorate .......................................................................................................... 229 Project evaluation information details ...................................................................... 229 2 Rural Damascus Governorate ......................................................................................... 271 Project evaluation information details ....................................................................... 271 Tartous Governorate ....................................................................................................... 320 Project evaluation information details ....................................................................... 320 General Report Annex ......................................................................................................... 347 3 Executive summary In spite of over 6 years into the Syrian emergency and its staggering effects on the nation and human lives and living conditions, the general population in Syria with their ideal adapting limit are attempting to recoup and transcend the crisis. UNDP in Syria, guided by UNDP Worldwide Vital Arrangement 2014-2017 and the Nation Program Report (CPD), is resolved to help and lead the early recuperation endeavors in the nation to reinforce the flexibility of the Syrian individuals through improving access to foundation and network administrations and supporting ability and monetary restoration in Syria utilizing region based methodology in nine governorates to accomplish its objectives. UNDP structures its reviving job for crisis influenced individuals at the family unit and network levels that would enable them to produce practical pay and upgrade wellbeing and training conditions for their families, while adding to nearby economy recovery and market rebuilding. Additionally, it would bolster immediate and roundabout social attachment by bringing host networks and inside uprooted individuals (IDPs) to live and cooperate by making positive methods for dealing with stress with the emergency. So as to achieve such reasonable effects and transformative changes, UNDP Syria is focused on evaluating the effect of jobs and monetary restoration mediations. While, in the emergency setting, dealing with occupation and monetary recuperation can indicate prompt outcomes and changes in individuals' lives, and can as a rule spare lives particularly in regions of contention and for defenseless gatherings, for example, FHH and PWD, subjective effect assessments including accumulation of baselines have not been led up until now. Therefore, we were engaged to perform the impact evaluation to cover almost all of the thematic areas intended form the 2016- 2017 country program in Syria. However, the main objectives of the evaluation was to provide as mentioned earlier measuring the United Nations Development Program assessments during the crisis. In addition to identifying the estimated impacts and potential pathways of impact of livelihood interventions. Within this context, the project impact assessment was carried out in (8) governorates of the Syrian Arab Republic out of (14) governorates as follows: Rural Damascus - Homs - Hama - Tartous - Lattakia - Aleppo – Al Hasakah - Deir ez-Zor. 38 projects were selected by the Division of Livelihoods and Early Recovery to measure their impact, but only 36 projects out of those 38, were implemented due to the difficulty of obtaining information on two projects