DOCSLIB.ORG

The Meisurger Law Firm, P.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Meisurger Law Firm, P.C THEMEISURGER LAW FIRM, P.C. 1493 CHAINBRIDQE ROAD Sum 201 MCLEAN,VIRQINIA 221 01 ADMI~EDTO PRACTICE IN (703) 556-9404 VIRGINIA FACSIMILE DISTRICTOF COLUMBIA (703) 556-8609 MARYLAND MISSOURI January 13,2006 Debra Yerg Daniel, Esq. Associate General Counsel The Maryland-National Park and Planning Commission 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 209 10-3760 Re: Good Counsel Transportation Agreement Dear Debra: I am enclosing for your files a copy of the recorded Transportation Management and Community Liaison Agreement for Our Lady of Good Counsel High School, Inc. Best regards, cc: Mr. Arthur Raimo (by mail) (wlencl.) C :\Documents and SettingsUanet Meiburgdy Documents\Good Counsel\CorrespU)aniel. 1 .doc OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL HIGH SCHOOL, INC. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY LIAISON AGREEMENT THIS TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY LIAISON AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made this 6th day of July, 2005, by and between OUR LADY OF GOOD COUNSEL HIGH SCHOOL, INC., a Maryland nonprofit corporation ("Good Counsel"), and THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD OF THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION (the 5 "Planning Board"). 2gg 0 r 13grri3 -4- mcnor RECITALS a,. m -(nzrU A. The subject property is comprised of approximately 52 acres located to the .74 -I- of Maryland Route 108 and to the west of Batchellors Forest Road in the Olney area of srn Montgomery County (the "Property"). B. Good Counsel intends to build a high school and related athletic and other facilities on the Property. Good Counsel intends to take occupancy of the Property in 2006. C. Good Counsel has filed and received Planning Board approval of a preliminary plan, designated Preliminary Plan No. 1-02082 pursuant to a Corrected Amended Opinion mailed on February 4,2004 (the "Amended Opinion"), attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The execution of this Agreement is one of the conditions of approval set forth in the Amended Opinion. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals, each of which is made a part of this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which each of the parties acknowledges, the parties agree as follows: Z$*& 1. Trans~ortationManagement Prom. The parties agree to the folla &zF - t*. Transportation Management Program ("TMP"): %El&#fiC tt+ is.& IdIiL CjSe& ad n-,. * Piriqtr &a ~~rt9 b.ihd A. Access to the School Propertv &G& Bik # 2eI ,IiisJJ :SCZ a jilZ tir 2685 1. There will be three points of access to the school property (as shown on the On-Site Vehicle Circulation ~xhibitattached hereto as Exhibit "By'). The primary t ', access will be from the two driveways that comprise the school's entrance fiom Old Vic Boulevard extended, with secondary access fiom Maryland Route 108. There will not be any access to the school property from existing Batchellors Forest Road. 2. The access from Route 108 will be a right inlright out access only. This limited access will be used by some school buses (primarily to exit the site) and by most delivery vehicles. , 3. There will be a two-way semicircular driveway providing access to the school from Old Vic Boulevard extended. This driveway will provide two points of entrance to and departure from the school property, one north of the main entrance to the school and one - south of the main entrance. B. On Site Parking During Daytime Hours 1. The subject property will have three parking areas that together will provide a minimum of 489 designated parking spaces, some of which will be handicapped1 accessible spaces. The northern parking lot will have approximately 235 parking spaces, the southern parking lot will have approximately 190 parking spaces and the western parking lot will have approximately 64 parking spaces. All of the parking lots will have two-way drive aisle circulation. 2. All vehicles that park on site during daytime hours, other than vehicles that park in the visitor or handicappedaccessible parking spaces, will be required to display a parking pass on their rear view mirror or a sticker in a designated spot on their front windshield. School employees will check the parking lots on a daily basis to ensure that all vehicles not parked in visitor or handicappedaccessible spaces are displaying the required pass or sticker and that no students are parked in visitor or handicapped/accessible spaces. If a vehicle does not have the required pass or sticker, corrective measures will be taken such as imposing a fine or towing the vehicle. If a vehicle with a pass or sticker is parked in a visitor or handicappedaccessible space, the school will locate the owner of the vehicle so that the vehicle can be moved to a proper parking space. 3. The school expects to issue a total of approximately 460 parking passes and stickers. The parking passes and stickers will be issued to faculty, staff and students. In issuing parking passes to students, the school will give priority to the older students, i.e. the school will start with members of the senior class and work downward to the other classes. As a practical matter, the school expects that all of the parking passes allocated to students will be issued to seniors and juniors. 4. The western parking lot will be used for visitor and faculty and staff parking. The school expects that approximately ten spaces will be reserved for visitor parking and the remaining regular (i.e., other than handicappedaccessible) spaces will be assigned to faculty and staff. 5. The school will instruct the students, faculty and staff that, if they intend to leave the school property shortly after school ends, they should park in the northern parking lot. This will permit the cars in the northern parking lot to leave before the afternoon bus departure. 6. The school will instruct the students, faculty and staff that, if they intend to stay on the school property after school ends, they should use the southern parking lot. This will minimize conflict between parked vehicles leaving the southern parking lot and the vehicles that arrive to pick up students after school. C. Traffic Circulation Pattern 1. The circulation pattern for school buses, vehicles entering the property to park there, and vehicles entering the property to drop off or pick up students is shown on the On-Site Vehicle Circulation Exhibit attached as Exhibit "B". 2. School buses will drop off and pick up in the northern parking lot. Buses departing to the east will use the right idright out driveway that connects to Route 108. Waiting buses will queue in the northern parking lot in the area outside the school cafeteria and the students will enter and exit the buses from the right side in this area. 3. Vehicles entering the property in the morning to park in the northern parking lot and vehicles leaving the property from the northern parking lot will enter and exit through the northern driveway from Old Vic Boulevard extended or, to a limited extent, through the right inlright out driveway connecting to Route 108. 4. Vehicles arriving to drop off students in the morning will enter the property through the southern driveway from the new road and will move through the southern parking lot to the southern entrance to the school, where they will discharge students fiom the passenger side of the vehicle. They will also exit the property through the southern driveway. 5. Vehicles arriving to pick up students in the afternoon will also enter and exit the property through the southern driveway. These vehicles will develop a stationary queue in the southern parking lot as shown on the attached Exhibit "B." The students will enter the vehicles from the passenger side of the vehicle, outside the southern entrance to the school. This route will accommodate as many as 57 vehicles in a stationary queue. 6. The only vehicles that will be permitted to drive into the driveway in front of the school will be those vehicles that will be parking in the western parking lot, which will be reserved for visitor, faculty and staff, and handicapped/accessible parking. D. Trip Mitigation -- Buses 1. Good Counsel initially will arrange for six extended bus routes, which Good Counsel anticipates will be as follows: Bowie-Laurel-Burtonsville Chevy Chase-Kensington-Glenmont Takoma Park-Silver Spring-Wheaton College Park-Langley Park-New Hampshire Ave. South Rockville Darnestown-Gaithersburg The number of bus routes and the routes themselves may be adjusted from time to time as needed to provide transportation for the students desiring to ride the bus. 2. Students will be required to sign up to take the bus at the beginning of the school year for the entire year, as is currently required. Good Counsel will continue to charge a fee for riding the bus. r 3. At least 245 students will ride the bus on normal school days. A "normal" school day shall mean a school day having a normal schedule (at present, 8:00 a.m. to 245 p.m.) and on which all students are expected to be in attendance. 4. If fewer than 245 students sign up to take the bus, Good Counsel will be required to operate a free shuttle bus to the school, in addition to the extended bus routes, from an appropriate location south of the school, such as the park and ride lot at Norbeck Road and Georgia Avenue. This bus will run at least twice in the weekday morning peak period. If at least 245 students sign up to take the bus, Good Counsel may run the free shuttle bus but will not be required to do this. Good Counsel may also have one or more of the buses running an extended route stop at this location in the weekday morning peak period to pick up students.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NCHRP Report 350, Which Specifies Speeds, Angles of Collision, and Vehicle Types, As Well As Defines Success Or Failure in the Testing
    93 H. CASE STUDIES The following is a selection of case studies that illustrate application of the principles and thought process A B C D E F G H behind CSD/CSS. The case stud- Effective Reflecting Achieving Ensuring Safe ies were assembled from materials Introduction About this Decision Community Environmental and Feasible Organizational Case Appendices and interviews conducted with pilot to CSD Guide Making Values Sensitivity Solutions Needs Studies state representatives, as well as with Management Structure other agencies contacted during the research project. The case studies Problem Definition are geographically diverse. They Project Development and illustrate a wide range of project Evaluation Framework contexts, from rural roads to urban Alternatives Development streets. They demonstrate that one can be context sensitive when dealing Alternatives Screening with a freeway, an arterial, or a local Evaluation and Selection road. In one case, they show that the Implementation mission of a transportation agency ���������� can and should go beyond providing for safe and efficient transportation. They represent both small projects and substantial efforts. Most of all, the case studies show how project success can be achieved by following the framework discussed here, and applying the right resources to solve a problem. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 480 Section H: Case Studies 94 This page intentionally left blank Section H: Case Studies A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions 95 CASE STUDY NO. 1 MERRITT PARKWAY GATEWAY PROJECT GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT Both the volume of traffic and its character and operations SETTING have changed over time. The Parkway now carries traffic The Merritt Parkway (The Parkway) was constructed in in excess of 50,000 vehicles per day in some segments.
    [Show full text]
  • HOWARD COUNTY OFFICIALS FIELD DIRECTIONS Alpha Ridge Park from the Baltimore Beltway (I-695) Or from Route 29, Take I-70 West to the Marriottsville Road Exit
    HOWARD COUNTY OFFICIALS FIELD DIRECTIONS Alpha Ridge Park From the Baltimore Beltway (I-695) or from Route 29, take I-70 West to the Marriottsville Road exit. Turn Right (North) on Marriottsville Road, then left at the next traffic light, Route 99. Follow Route 99 about 0.8 miles to the wooden sign (second sign) for Alpha Ridge Park on the left. From Columbia, take Route 32 West to Route 99. Make a right turn and follow Route 99 to the entrance of Alpha Ridge Park. APL From Route 32 take Cedar Lane/Pindell School Road exit (1st exit West of Route 29). Go South on Pindell School Road to 1st intersection. Turn left onto Sanner Road. After Sanner Road makes a sharp right it will go up a hill. Field will be at the top of the hill on the left. Alternate: From Route 32 take Route 29 South. Go to Johns Hopkins Road. Take Johns Hopkins Road West to Sanner Road. Turn Right on Sanner Road and follow to field which will be on your Right. Cedar Lane Park From Route 29 take Route 108 west toward Clarksville about 2 3/4 miles. Turn left onto Cedar Lane (across from Board of Education). Entrance to park is about 1/4 mile on the left. Centennial Park Centennial Park West (Ball Fields 3,4,5) From Route 29 take Route 108 west toward Clarksville. Turn right onto Centennial Lane. Entrance to park will be on the right. Centennial Park North (Ball Fields 1,2) Continue past entrance to Centennial Park West.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2012 Noncredit Brochure W Front Cover1.Pdf
    WELCOME! “How I Spent My Summer Vacation” . Want to make sure it’s memorable? Take one or more of the classes in this booklet! HCC’s Continuing Education classes give you • expert instruction by practicing professionals • the college’s 40 years of proven • day, evening, & weekend class times educational excellence in the county • convenient locations throughout Howard • quality. We have a 98.6% satisfaction County rate among our customers, and • state-of-the-art labs most of them rate our courses as • small class sizes and affordable prices good-to-excellent. • CEUs, certifi cates, & other credentials • value. The Learning Resources Network has • an opportunity to meet people from your described our Division as “one of the top community continuing education units in North America.” REGISTRATION FORMS ARE IN THE BACK OF THIS BOOKLET. Award-winning! Learn to Ride Earn a License Polish your Skills Become an Expert! Whatever your skill level, The Rider School has the right class for you! www.riderschool.org 443-518-4808 General Information Phone: 443-518-1700 HCC Continuing Education Web Site: www.howardcc.edu/coned SUMMER 2012 NONCREDIT CLASSES what’s INSIDE 2 BUSINESS 2 General Business Skills 2 Leadership, Supervision 2 Project Management 6 Entrepreneurship, Self-Employment, Small Business 8 Child Care and Other Occupations 11 COMPUTERS & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 11 Computer Basics 12 Office Applications 14 Databases 14 Accounting and Finance 14 Project/Time Management 14 Desktop, Web, Video Graphics 16 Internet & Web Site Development
    [Show full text]
  • 2713^7 Contents
    MINERALS OF WASHINGTON, D.C. AND VICINITY by Lawrence R. Bernstein U. S. Geo^r^'ce.l Survey OPEN F-'::. r;.".r'0.?;r cer.-..: 2713^7 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Scope of report 4 Mineral collecting 5 Acknowledgments 6 Introduction 6a ITT3 Aclj.il1 -> ! T^______.___~^. -"» _«_____«..«_»«__.. " " .._.«__._.._*_.__._.,_.._.-. _>-.-- -_>-->.-..-. Q Triassic deposits 31 Mineral localities 38 District of Columbia : 38 IMavtrlWlCfci JT XClilUl a Tirl ~ __ ___« - - -_ -»-i-___ .__- _ __- - ________________ m~m~m~ m~ m~ «M » M* **A^J ^ Anne Arundel County 43 Baltimore County 45 Howard County - 74 Montgomery County 88 Prince Georges County 120 Virginia . 129 Arlington County 129 Fairfax County 131 Fauquier County 139 Loudoun County 143 Prince William County 149 Diabase quarries of northern Virginia 155 CAPTIONS Illustrations Plate 1. Mineral localities of Washington, B.C., and vicinity. Plate 2. Generalized geologic map of Washington. D.C. and vicinity, Plate 3. Mineral deposits and generalized geology of the Triassic rocks near Washington, D.C. List of Figures Figure 1. Index map showing region covered in this report. Stfaded area is covered in most detail. Figure 2. Block diagram of the Washington, D.C. region showing physiographic provinces and major geographic and geologic features. ITfgure -3. Coastal Plain deposits of Washington, D.C. and vicinity. Figure 4. Generalized cross section of a typical complex pegmatite of the Washington, D.C. area. Figure 5. Rhythmically.layered gabbro of the Baltimore Gabbro Com­ plex at Ilchester, Maryland. Figure 6. Triassic diabase dike forming a ridge north of Route 7 near Dranesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Kendall W. Gambrill's History of Highland
    History of Highland Kendall W.Gambrill History of Maryland January 19, 1965 here is nothing altogether earth shattering about Highland. T Neither is there any momentous event in its history. The fate of no army was decided by where Josh Disney emptied his chamber pot. No government fell when Mrs. Dentz sang out her hymn on A windy March morning. Yet, the events alluded to and the many Others which, added to them, make the history of Highland are Worthy of being recorded. History is the story of man. The History of Highland is a tale taken from that story. There are two elements to this history. One is the physical Setting, and the other is the people associated with that setting. Highland is located North 39° 11’, West 76° 57’. To the south Lies the Patuxent river. Highland extends several miles north- East of the Patuxent for about three miles along its length. There being no official boundaries, one is left with determining For oneself just where Highland ends and some other community begins. The land is in the gently rolling lower Piedmont. As the most conspicuous topographical feature of the area, The Patuxent river attracted the attention of the first of our Species in the area - the Indians. The Indians gave it the name It now holds. In their tongue the name means “Small Descending Waters”.1 Although these Indians, the Piscataways, lived in Southern Maryland, it is evident that they were familiar with The length of the Patuxent valley by the name they gave to this river.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard County Council
    COUNCILMEMBERS Christiana Mercer Rigby, Chairperson District 3 Opel Jones, Vice Chairperson District 2 Howard County Council Deb Jung District 4 George Howard Building 3430 Court House Drive Liz Walsh District 1 Ellicott City, Maryland 21043-4392 David Yungmann District 5 Minutes (Approved) Legislative Public Hearing Monday, June 17, 2019, 7:00 p.m. Banneker Room Members Present: Christiana Mercer Rigby, Council Chairperson; Opel Jones, Vice Chairperson; Deb Jung, Council Member; and David Yungmann, Council Member. Not present: Liz Walsh. Staff Present: Jessica Feldmark, Administrator; Janssen Evelyn, Administration; Theo Wimberly, Legislative Analyst; Michelle Harrod, Deputy County Auditor; John Gwynn, Assistant County Solicitor; Roz Hightower, Administrative Support; Shae Garvey, Administrative Support. Minutes prepared by Kel Berg, Administrative Support. I. Call to Order at 7:02 p.m. II. Pledge of Allegiance led by Council Chair Mercer Rigby. Christiana Mercer Rigby, Chairperson moved to approve to allow the reading of bills by short title, seconded by Opel Jones, Vice Chairperson. The motion carried as follows AYES: Christiana Mercer Rigby, Council Chairperson; Opel Jones, Council Vice Chairperson; Deb Jung, Council Member; and David Yungmann, Council Member III. Public Hearing A. Appointments 1. Council Resolution 90-2019 – A RESOLUTION recommending to the Governor of Maryland that James Caldwell be appointed to the Patuxent River Commission. (No expiration date) a. James Caldwell 2. Council Resolution 91-2019 – A RESOLUTION confirming the appointment of Julie Cleveland to the Local Behavioral Health Advisory Board. (No expiration date) a. Julie Cleveland - Jessup, MD 3. Council Resolution 92-2019 – A RESOLUTION confirming the appointment of Phillip Dodge to the Board of Library Trustees.
    [Show full text]
  • Zachary Hicks Spring 2016 MRED Graduate Capsto
    Prepared for: Colvin Institute University of Maryland, College Park Prepared by: Zachary Hicks Spring 2016 MRED Graduate Capstone Mentor: Tim Pula Architects: Aren Knudsen, Christiane Machado, and Abby Winter Effective Date: May 16, 2016 Site Inspection: February 3, 2016 Table of Contents 1. General Context .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Discussion of General Context Analysis .......................................................................... 5 B. Property Location ............................................................................................................. 5 C. Property Characteristics ................................................................................................... 7 D. Traffic ............................................................................................................................... 8 E. Pedestrian Flow .................................................................................................................... 9 F. Transit .................................................................................................................................. 9 G. Physical Geography ........................................................................................................ 11 H. Community Benefits ...................................................................................................... 12 I. Architectural Character .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Survey of Maryland Route 32 Between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, Howard County, Maryland
    1 Patterson Par!, & M-.-^v DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION OF ARCHEOLOGY FILE REPORT NUMBER 238 ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MARYLAND ROUTE 32 BETWEEN PINDELL SCHOOL ROAD AND MARYLAND ROUTE 108, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND by RICHARD G. ERVIN Report submitted to the Maryland State Highway Administration Contract Number HO 292-202-770 HO 1989 36 I •• » I. .' - -!>t£: V) f "')•'•:>","'I :i".- ':Ti t.r L-rn Frontispiece: Painting of the mill at Simpsonville as it appeared in the early 20th century. The artist painted the mill while recuperating from an automobile accident near Simpsonville. The original of this painting and the one in Figure 12 are in the possession of Walter Iglehart, whose father operated the mill in the early 20th century. Photograph courtesy of Lee Preston. -u - Ho DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES £ . 1 MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION OF ARCHEOLOGY FILE REPORT NUMBER 238 ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MARYLAND ROUTE 32 BETWEEN PINDELL SCHOOL ROAD AND MARYLAND ROUTE 108, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND by RICHARD G. ERVIN Report submitted to the Maryland State Highway Administration Contract Number HO 292-202-770 1989 Archeological Survey of Maryland Route 32 Between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, Howard County, Maryland by Richard G. Ervin Division of Archeology Maryland Geological Survey ABSTRACT Archeologists surveyed five proposed alignments of Maryland Route 32 between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, finding three archeological sites in the project area. The Spring Hill site (18HO148) is a possible late 19th century rural residential structure location. The site is outside the proposed Alternate B right-of-way, and it is recommended that it be avoided during construction.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Dr
    HCPSS 4 SCHOOL SEL DOOR REPLMNT BID SET SECTION 011000 - SUMMARY PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and other Division 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. Section Includes: 1. Project information. 2. Work covered by Contract Documents. 3. Phased construction. 4. Work by Owner. 5. Access to site. 6. Coordination with occupants. 7. Work restrictions. 8. Specification and Drawing conventions. 9. Permits, Fees, and Notices. 10. Reference Standards 11. Special Requirements 12. Existing Systems Affected by the Work B. Related Requirements: 1. Section 015000 "Temporary Facilities and Controls" for limitations and procedures governing temporary use of Owner's facilities. 1.3 PROJECT INFORMATION A. Project Identification: Howard County Public School System Four School Select Door Replacements. 1. Project Location: a. School 1: Clarksville Elementary School, 12041 Maryland Route 108, Clarksville, MD 21029 b. School 2: Lisbon Elementary School, 15901 Frederick Road, Woodbine, MD 21797 c. School 3: Cradlerock Elementary / Lake Elkhorn Middle School, 6680 Cradlerock Way, Columbia, MD 21045 d. School 4: Jeffers Hill Elementary School, 6000 Tamar Drive, Columbia, MD 21045 B. Owner: Howard County Public Schools School Construction, 9020 Mendenhall Court, Suite C, Columbia, MD 21045. 1. Owner's Representative: Mr. Dan Lubeley, HCPSS School Construction, 9020 Mendenhall Court, Suite C, Columbia, MD 21045, 410-313-8203. SUMMARY 011000 - 1 HCPSS 4 SCHOOL SEL DOOR REPLMNT BID SET C. Architect: SM+P Architects, 1100 Cathedral Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, 410-685-3582. D. Electrical Engineer: James Posey Associates, Inc., 3112 Lord Baltimore Drive, Baltimore, MD 21244, 410-265-6100 1.4 WORK COVERED BY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal Report Lipman Frizzell & Mitchell
    Old MD Rt. 108 Old Maryland Route 108 Ellicott City, Maryland 21042 Report Date: March 23, 2020 LIPMAN FRIZZELL & APPRAISAL REPORT MITCHELL Prepared for: Real Estate Consultants Ms. Melanie Bishop 6240 Old Dobbin Lane, Suite 140 Chief, Real Estate Service Division Columbia, Maryland 21045 Howard County Department of Public Works Phone: 410-423-2300 3430 Courthouse Drive Howard Building 2nd Floor Fax: 410-423-2410 Ellicott City, Maryland 21043 www.LFMvalue.com Capital Project No.: C-0360 LFM #: 20-025 RESD Bid No.: 2019-064 March 23, 2020 Ms. Melanie Bishop Chief, Real Estate Service Division Howard County Department of Public Works 3430 Courthouse Drive Howard Building 2nd Floor Ellicott City, Maryland 21043 RE: Old MD Rt. 108 Capital Project No.: C-0360 RESD Bid No.: 2019-064 Old Maryland Route 108 Ellicott City, Maryland 21042 Dear Ms. Bishop: In accordance with your request, we have prepared an appraisal of the above-referenced property. The subject property is located at the intersection of Columbia Road and Maryland Route 108, and totals 1.087 acres of land area on two noncontiguous parcels. The property is owned by Howard County, Maryland in fee simple. The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the ±1.09 acres and the value of the proposed perpetual easement with no development rights per the instructions of the client. An access easement totaling 42,253 sq.ft. will be conveyed on the subject site as part of Howard County’s sale to the adjacent property owner in the second scenario. This appraisal report sets forth the pertinent data gathered, the techniques employed, and the reasoning leading to our value opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Laytonsville Montgomery County, Maryland
    A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE TOWN OF LAYTONSVILLE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared By: Date: May 2014 Town of Laytonsville Montgomery County, Maryland MAYOR Dan Prats TOWN COUNCIL Charles Bradsher Dave Preusch Josh Pomeroy Jim Ruspi PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Eric Wenger, Chair Brendan Deyo Dave Preusch Pete Stadler Tim Shortley CLERK Charlene Dillingham TREASURER Chris Wilkinson May 2014 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 LAYTONSVILLE PAST AND PRESENT 6 Past 6 Present 7 STATE LEGISLATION 10 The Land Use Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland 10 Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act of 1992 10 Smart Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act of 1997 12 HB 1141, HB 2 and HB 1160 12 TOWN VISION AND AGRICULTURAL - HISTORY INTEGRITY 15 Goals and Objectives 15 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 17 Current Conditions 17 Recommendations 18 District Criteria 18 Unit Criteria 19 Social - Historical Significance 19 Architectural Significance 19 LAND USE ELEMENT 21 Goals 21 Current Conditions 21 Projections 21 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 23 Goals 23 Current Conditions 23 Recommendations 24 COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT 26 Goals 26 Current Conditions 26 Recommendations 28 IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENT 29 Goals 29 Current Conditions 29 Zoning Ordinance 29 Subdivision Regulations 30 MUNICIPAL GROWTH ELEMENT 31 Goals 31 Current Conditions 31 Anticipated Growth 31 Annexation 31 3 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 34 Goals 34 Recommendations 34 WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT 35 Goals 35 Water Assessment 35 Wastewater Assessment 36 Sustainable Growth & Agricultural
    [Show full text]
  • A Historic Context for the Archaeology of Industrial Labor in the State Of
    A Historic Context for the Archaeology of Industrial Labor in the State of Maryland Robert C. Chidester Masters of Applied Anthropology Program Department of Anthropology University of Maryland at College Park Submitted to the Maryland Historical Trust In Partial Fulfillment of a Maryland Heritage Internship Grant December 2003 Revised Version, March 2004 Abstract This report presents a historic context for industrial labor in the state of Maryland. Industrial labor is defined as the socially-governed activity of transforming nature for the purpose of the efficient processing and manufacture of commercial goods. Labor’s heritage as represented in the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties, the Maryland Archaeological Site Records, and selected secondary sources is surveyed following the geographical and chronological guidelines presented in the Maryland Comprehensive Historic Preservation Plan (Weissman 1986). Types of industry and labor, class relations, the labor movement and the social and domestic lives of industrial laborers are all considered; additionally, industrialization in Maryland is linked to other important themes in the state’s history. An overview of the archaeology of industrial labor is given for each of Maryland’s 23 counties and Baltimore City, emphasizing important excavations. An analysis of the state of labor archaeology in Maryland is given, along with suggestions for important research themes that have been thus far unaddressed or poorly addressed by Maryland archaeologists. i Table of Contents Abstract.....................................................................................i
    [Show full text]