DOCSLIB.ORG

Culling the Deer WHAT YOU NEED to KNOW

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Culling the Deer WHAT YOU NEED to KNOW culling the deer WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW Mt. Lebanon Commission has autho- 10,000 deer and provided 200,000 tions of the public golf course, Twin Hills rized an archery hunt as part of an pounds of venison to food banks. Park, McNeilly Park, the public works ongoing deer management effort to Other experts have helped the facility and Robb Hollow Park. reduce deer-automobile crashes. The municipal commission define its goals WILL THE PARKS BE CLOSED? program began September 19 and over the years, including biologists and No. All public areas and parks will will continue through January. wildlife conservation officers from the remain open. Pennsylvania Game Commission. HOW DOES THE ARCHERY WILL SAFE WALKING ROUTES TO PROGRAM WORK? WHAT SAFETY MEASURES ARE SCHOOL BE AFFECTED? Experienced archers will conduct a BEING IMPLEMENTED? None of the areas are within a recom- deer hunt on private and specified pub- By far, the greatest way to ensure mended safe walking route. lic properties in Mt. Lebanon during safety is with responsible hunting archery season beginning September by responsible hunters. The archer HOW WILL THE PUBLIC KNOW 19 through the last weekend in January selection program has been extremely ABOUT THE PROGRAM? Public hunting areas will be posted. for with a break for two weeks in December. rigorous. White Buffalo has chosen the duration of the hunt. LeboALERTs The program involves legal archery hunt- seven hunters (with four more await- will be sent as needed. We will include ing following all state game commission ing approval), selected after an appli- updates in Mt. Lebanon Magazine and rules and requires no special permit. All cation and an interview. All hunters hunters are required to harvest three at www.lebomag.com and www.mtleba- are certified in bow hunter education, non.org in the newsflash section on the antlerless deer before removing a deer including safety and ethics, and passed with antlers. front page and on the deer management a proficiency test with a bow or cross- page at www.mtlebanon.org/index.aspx- The nonprofit wildlife management bow. They must have attended an ori- and resource group White Buffalo Inc., ?NID=2114. We have notified school entation meeting and passed a criminal officials. of Connecticut (www.whitebuffaloinc. history check at the hunter’s expense. org) will supervise the program. Project Each hunter signed a pledge to hold the WHAT HAPPENS TO THE manager is Jody Maddock. public interest above their own. Some HARVESTED DEER? Municipal officials will receive a sum- of them are police officers. Hunters must donate every third deer mary, including a count of deer taken, at The local team leader White Buffalo to the Hunters Sharing the Harvest pro- the conclusion of the program. has selected has been a bow hunter edu- gram. It is likely that more than one of every three will be donated there; however, WHAT ARE THE HOURS OF THE cation and safety instructor for 20 years many of the hunters already have estab- PROGRAM? and has taught many local hunters. lished relationships with other sources. Hunting can take place from 30 min- To boost public confidence, hunting utes prior to sunrise to 30 minutes in public areas is restricted to police HOW MUCH WILL THE ARCHERY following sunset. Hunters may work in officers only. All hunters will carry and PROGRAM COST IN THE 2015-16 designated public parks Monday through wear ID identifying them as being part HUNTING SEASON? Friday and on approved private property of Mt. Lebanon’s program. $15,460. Monday through Saturday. There will be Shots must be taken 15 yards or clos- IS MT. LEBANON EXPLORING OTHER no hunting Sundays. er to the deer. Shots will either come DEER CONTROL OPTIONS? from above the deer, such as from a tree ARE THERE PROGRAMS LIKE THIS This month, Mt. Lebanon stand, or be shot into a backstop, such IN OTHER LOCATIONS? Commissioners will discuss issuing a as a hill behind the deer. Many other areas in the state have Request for Proposal for culling deer used legal archery programs, including HOW WERE THE PRIVATE PROP- using sharpshooters. Commissioners also Allegheny County, Upper St. Clair, ERTIES SELECTED? have authorized municipal officials to Bethel Park, Peters Township, South Interested private property owners submit a proposal to the Humane Society Park and Fox Chapel. contacted White Buffalo offering to of the U.S., and a private foundation for donate their properties for participation funding to support a deer fertility control WHO HELPED MT. LEBANON in the project. Officials from White and sterilization project. DEVISE THE PROGRAM, AND HOW Buffalo contacted each applicant and EXPERIENCED ARE THEY? WHOM SHOULD I CONTACT IF I White Buffalo Inc., and its president the applicant’s neighbors for any addi- HAVE A CONCERN OR WANT TO and founder, Dr. Anthony DeNicola, tional permissions needed. Each prop- REPORT SOMETHING? have been consulting with Mt. Lebanon erty was rated based on White Buffalo’s If you have a general concern about regarding deer overpopulation for the discretion, with more weight given to the program, call Municipal Planner last few years. White Buffalo. has nearly areas of heavy vegetation or woods. Keith McGill at 412-343-3684 or email 20 years experience and uses biologists, WHAT PUBLIC AREAS ARE BEING him at [email protected]. If you veterinarians, project managers and field USED FOR THE HUNT? have an issue of immediate safety con- technicians to help manage over-abun- The conservation area at Connor cern, call 9-1-1. dant species. It has removed more than Road and Terrace Drive, wooded por- WILL MT. LEBANON BE IDENTIFYING THE PRIVATE PROPERTIES THAT ARE PARTICIPATING IN THE ARCHERY PROGRAM? No. All private property owners who expressed an interest in donating their property for participation in the program were instructed to contact White Buffalo Inc. directly. We understand that the donations were made based upon a condition of confidentiality. As such the municipality does not have a list identifying which properties were selected to participate. In Pennsylvania all hunting is regulated by the PA Game Commission. Hunting is permitted under State law on private property provided the homeowner and the hunter follow the rules of the Game Commission related to permits, safety zones, hours, etc. Game Commission laws supersede any local laws or ordinances. There is no requirement that a property owner notify the municipality that hunting is taking place on their property. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journal of Animal Law Received Generous Support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Michigan State University College of Law
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL LAW Michigan State University College of Law APRIL 2009 Volume V J O U R N A L O F A N I M A L L A W Vol. V 2009 EDITORIAL BOARD 2008-2009 Editor-in-Chief ANN A BA UMGR A S Managing Editor JENNIFER BUNKER Articles Editor RA CHEL KRISTOL Executive Editor BRITT A NY PEET Notes & Comments Editor JA NE LI Business Editor MEREDITH SH A R P Associate Editors Tabb Y MCLA IN AKISH A TOWNSEND KA TE KUNK A MA RI A GL A NCY ERIC A ARMSTRONG Faculty Advisor DA VID FA VRE J O U R N A L O F A N I M A L L A W Vol. V 2009 Pee R RE VI E W COMMITT ee 2008-2009 TA IMIE L. BRY A NT DA VID CA SSUTO DA VID FA VRE , CH A IR RE B ECC A J. HUSS PETER SA NKOFF STEVEN M. WISE The Journal of Animal Law received generous support from the Animal Legal Defense Fund and the Michigan State University College of Law. Without their generous support, the Journal would not have been able to publish and host its second speaker series. The Journal also is funded by subscription revenues. Subscription requests and article submissions may be sent to: Professor Favre, Journal of Animal Law, Michigan State University College of Law, 368 Law College Building, East Lansing MI 48824. The Journal of Animal Law is published annually by law students at ABA accredited law schools. Membership is open to any law student attending an ABA accredited law college.
    [Show full text]
  • Sterilization, Hunting and Culling : Combining Management Approaches for Mitigating Suburban Deer Impacts
    Poster Presentation Sterilization, Hunting and Culling: Combining Management Approaches for Mitigating Suburban Deer Impacts J.R. Boulanger University of North Dakota P.D. Curtis and M.L. Ashdown Cornell University ABSTRACT: Based on decades of growing deer impacts on local biodiversity, agricultural damage, and deer-vehicle collisions, in 2007 we implemented an increasingly aggressive suburban deer research and management program on Cornell University lands in Tompkins County, New York. We initially divided Cornell lands into a suburban core campus area (1,100 acres [4.5 km2]) and adjacent outlying areas that contain lands where deer hunting was permitted (~4,000 acres [16.2 km2]). We attempted to reduce deer numbers by surgically sterilizing deer in the core campus zone and increasing harvest of female deer in the hunting zone through an Earn-a-Buck program. During the first 6 years of this study, project staff spayed 96 female deer (>90% of all deer on campus); 69 adult does were marked with radio transmitters to monitor movements and survival. From 2008 to 2013, hunters harvested >600 deer (69–165 each hunting season). By winter 2013, we stabilized the campus deer herd to approximately 100 animals (57 deer/mi2 [22 deer/km2]), a density much higher than project goals (14 deer/mi2). Although we reduced doe and fawn numbers by approximately 38% and 79%, respectfully, this decrease was offset by an increase in bucks that appeared on camera during our population study. In 2014, we supplemented efforts using deer damage permits (DDP) with archery sharpshooting over bait, and collapsible Clover traps with euthanasia by penetrating captive bolt.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Facts on Canada's Commercial Seal Hunt
    Fast Facts on Canada's Commercial Seal Hunt About the Hunt: Canada's commercial seal hunt is the largest slaughter of marine mammals on Earth. In just 10 years, over two million seals have been killed for their fur. This does not include the tens of thousands of injured seals who have died below the ice. 97 percent of the seals killed in the past 10 years have been less than three months of age. Many of these defenseless seals did not yet know how to swim. In 2001, an independent veterinary panel concluded that the seal hunt results in considerable and unacceptable suffering. They noted that in 42 percent of the seals examined there was not enough evidence of cranial injury to even guarantee unconsciousness at the time of skinning. Harp seals rely on sea ice to give birth to and nurse their pups and they need the ice to remain intact until the pups are strong enough to survive in open water. Climate change has caused sea ice to diminish at an alarming rate off Canada’s east coast in the harp seal birthing grounds. Sea ice formation has been well below average for each of the past 15 years, with 2010 having the lowest sea ice formation on record. The Canadian government has estimated up to 100% mortality in harp seal birthing areas when the sea ice did not form or melted too early in the season. Despite this, the Canadian government continues to authorize massive harp seal quotas each year. The Humane Society of the United States takes no issue with subsistence seal hunting by aboriginal people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Production and Culling Rate with Regard to the Profitability in a Dairy Herd
    ADVANCED RESEARCH IN LIFE SCIENCES 1(1), 2017, 48-52 www.degruyter.com/view/j/arls DOI: 10.1515/arls-2017-0008 Research Article The Analysis of Production and Culling Rate With Regard to the Profitability in a Dairy Herd József Horváth*, Zsanett Tóth, Edit Mikó University of Szeged, Faculty of Agriculture, Institute of Economics and Rural Development and Institute of Animal Sciences and Wildlife Management, Hungary Accepted June, 2017 Abstract As milk prices move away from production costs, dairy farms are under increased pressure to find ways to protect profitability on the farm. Producers have some problems that they can improve. Improve the milk production, produce more milk to sell focused on quality (reduce the amount of high level of somatic cell count). The deterioration of animal health status (lameness, mastitis and different metabolic disorders) can have a serious impact on cow productivity, causing pain and discomfort, production losses and might result in a decision to cull the animal. Improving herd reproductive performance is an important aspect of profitable farm management. The aim of this work is to analyse milk production, reasons of culling and culling rate in different lactation on a dairy cattle farm. Key words: dairy cow economy, culling rate, productive lifetime, break-even point. Introduction replacement heifers. Furthermore, it allows cows In the dairy cattle breeding the longevity of cows to achieve maximum milk yield and increases the and reasons for culling are serious research proportion of higher yielding cows in the herd. [3] problems. The profitability of the dairy herd Culling of dairy cows is a serious economic depends on milk the yield of lactation and the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • BREEDING KOI in the CITY by Douglas Dahl 2002 Update to Article Printed in Vol 22, Issue 5 in KOIUSA in 1998
    BREEDING KOI IN THE CITY by Douglas Dahl 2002 update to article printed in Vol 22, Issue 5 in KOIUSA in 1998 Why do you want to breed koi, I ask? You could respond "imported koi are too expensive", or "you want to learn how they change so you can purchase baby koi with more confidence" or "you are just bored and want to try it". This discussion addresses city breeding. Country or farm breeding can be a very different process in many ways due to available growing ponds and I leave that discussion to the professionals. What is Needed My experience in city breeding suggests the following list of needed items: 800 gallon tank or pond for breeding (use as medical tank when not breeding) 3000 gallon tank or pond to grow some of the baby koi for 1 year separate small tank or pond area to rest the female after breeding and for culling working filter for both the 800 and 3000 gallon tanks or ponds if they are close together submersible pump with strainer on intake (18" drilled PVC tube surrounded by foam 6x6x18) 1/6 hp pump for the 3000 gallon system Air pump and air stones for breeding tank GFI electrical outlets for all pumps Net to cover breeding tank to keep breeding fish in Brine shrimp jugs, air system and light for food breeding Several kinds of food (to be described later) Net, tub, plastic bags to transport breeders and catch babies Ammonia and nitrite test kits Source of de chlorinated water (3000 gallon tank while 800 gallon tank in use) Breeding media (hyacinth plants, podocarpus branches, mop heads, breeding nets) About $1500 to spare for expenses Strong back and strong stomach HARD HEART FOR CULLING Someone to feed the babies every 3-4 hours during the day Timing, Romance and Birth The time to prepare for breeding is one month before pond water reaches 70 degrees F.
    [Show full text]
  • Coexisting with Deer an Advocate’S Guide for Preventing Deer Culls in Your Community
    Coexisting with Deer An advocate’s guide for preventing deer culls in your community How to use this toolkit We fight the big fight for all animals, but we can’t do it without your help. This toolkit is designed to add power to your passion; to enable you to be the most effective advocate for the deer in your community. Suburban development has created an environment in which deer thrive; our backyards provide the “edge” habitat (where forest meets field) they prefer, offering ample supply of food and water. Access to abundant resources leads to healthy deer and higher reproductive rates, and as deer populations increase, so too do deer-human conflicts. The result too often is an assumption that there are “too many deer” and a call for lethal control. This toolkit is designed to empower advocates like you to take action, be it against planned lethal measures, or proactively encouraging the adoption of a humane deer management plan. It’s often thought that the voice of a large, national organization is enough, but the voice of a constituent – yours! – is actually the most powerful tool in the fight for the welfare of deer in your community. Local decision-makers want to hear from you, not an outsider. A groundswell of local opposition to a deer cull, or in support of a humane deer management plan, has the greatest impact. This toolkit will provide guidance on how best to voice your opinion, and how to inspire others to do the same. The toolkit is organized as follows: o Learn the issue: Knowing more about the types of conflicts your community may be having with deer can help you better understand how to address them humanely.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Animals in Sports
    Existence, Breeding, a,nd Rights: The Use of Animals in Sports Donald Scherer Bowling Green State University Against these lines of argument one frequently encounters a certain objection. It is argued that since the animals for fighting, hunting and racing exist only because they have been bred for such human uses, human beings are justified in so treating them. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate this line ofobjection, or to speak more precisely, to evaluate the two distinct objections implicit in this line. For the objection may be either that (l) the present uses of the animals are justified because they are better for the animals than the Standardly, philosophical arguments about the alternative, namely non-existence, or that quality of treatment human beings owe nonhuman animals! rest on two bases. Peter Singer is famous (2) breeding an animal for a purpose gives the for arguing from the capacity of animals to feel pain breeders (transferable) rights over what they to the conclusion that since almost none of the pain have bred. human beings cause animals is necessary, almost none of it is morally justifiable (Singer, 1989, pp. 78-79). I shall pursue these alternatives sequentially. Singer rests his case on the premise that who suffers pain does not affect the badness of the suffering, so The Value of Existence that, without strong justification, the infliction of pain is universally wrong (Ibid., pp. 77-78). Tom Regan is The strength ofthe first form ofthe objection rests on equally famous for his argument that the beliefs and a common intuition comparing the values of existence desires which normal one year-old mammals clearly and non-existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Wildlife: the Pr...Cons of Culling Animals
    Advertisement Daily News The Magazine Maps Science Education Games Events Blogs Movies Explorers Apps Trips National Geographic Daily News Killing Wildlife: The Pros and Cons of Culling Animals Is targeting species like badgers, swans, and deer effective? And is it ethical? A badger looks for food at the British Wildlife Centre in Surrey. The animals are considered a risk to cattle because they may transmit bovine tuberculosis. PHOTOGRAPH BY STEFAN WERMUTH, REUTERS By Will James for National Geographic PUBLISHED MARCH 5, 2014 Last fall, the U.K.'s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs targeted badgers for culling—the selective killing of a species as a population control measure. Badgers reportedly transmit bovine tuberculosis, a disease with a profound economic impact on farmers whose cows test positive. But a recent report by an independent panel leaked by the BBC said the culls failed in efficacy and humaneness. (Related: "Mr. Badger Should Be Worried: Britain Ponders a Cull.") Proposed culls have made headlines in the United States as well. Wildlife managers have targeted bison in Montana and swans, geese, and deer in New York. What's driving these high-profile culling programs? Are they necessary? Can they be done ethically? And what's at the heart of the debate between their proponents and their detractors? We explored the controversy over culling with Mary Pearl, a conservationist with the City University of New York who formerly served as president of the Wildlife Trust, a nonprofit organization now called EcoHealth Alliance. Wildlife culls have been in the news a lot lately. Is this a new practice? I would say nature has been a culler, in the past, of wildlife species.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Animal Welfare: Management of Wildlife Lecture Notes
    Module 21 Wild Animal Welfare: Management of Wildlife Lecture Notes Slide 1: This lecture was first developed for World Animal Protection by Dr Christine Leeb (University of Bristol) in 2003 and updated by Dr Matt Leach (University of Bristol) in 2007. It was revised by World Animal Protection scientific advisors in 2012 using updates provided by Dr Caroline Hewson. Slide 2: Today’s lecture introduces you to some of the biggest welfare issues affecting wildlife. We will concentrate on the main issues affecting free-living wildlife, and then focus on the welfare of captive wildlife. We will also touch on some ways that the welfare issues concerned might be resolved. Slide 3: In this module, we define a wild animal as: a free-living or captive animal from a species that typically lives without human intervention, and whose parents and forebears were not selectively bred for docility or ease of handling. As with other species, our concern for the welfare of wild animals concerns their physical functioning, their mental state/feelings and the performance of behaviours that are important to them. Typically welfare concerns revolve around birds and terrestrial vertebrates. However, note that all vertebrates are sentient, including fish, and that many invertebrates are likely to be sentient too or, at least, to be able to suffer pain. When we consider wild animals within the common ethical frameworks, respect for nature is commonly invoked by conservationists. That framework places more emphasis on the continuing welfare of the species as a whole, such that the functioning, feelings and behavioural aspects of an individual’s experience may be subordinated to the collective feelings, functioning and continued natural behaviour of the species and, perhaps, the wider ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Safari Hunting of Australian Wild Exotic Game—Extension Establishment of a Peak Body for the Industry
    Safari Hunting of Australian Wild Exotic Game—Extension Establishment of a peak body for the industry by G.McL. Dryden, S.G. Craig-Smith and C. Arcodia October 2007 RIRDC Publication No 07/161 RIRDC Project No UQ-116A © 2007 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 556 4 ISSN 1440-6845 Safari Hunting of Australian Wild Exotic Game—Extension: Establishment of a peak body for the industry Publication No. 07/161 Project No. UQ-116A The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Power for Animals COVER STORY
    A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY 2010 | Number 2 AVmagazine Consumer Power COVER STORY for Animals PRODUCT TESTING: BEGINNING TO AN END? pg 4 2010 Number 2 Consumer Power for Animals 8 FEATURES PRODUCT TESTING: 4Beginning to an End? Where we’ve been. Where we are. Where we’re going. 16 By Crystal Schaeffer 8 The Leaping Bunny Program While other compassionate shopping lists exist, only the Leaping Bunny can assure certified companies are truly cruelty-free. By Vicki Katrinak 12 What’s Cruelty-Free? Reading labels can be difficult, but looking for the Leaping Bunny Logo is easy. By Vicki Katrinak DEPARTMENTS 14 Tom’s of Maine: A Brush Above the Rest Putting ideals into action, Tom’s challenged FDA, and in a precedent-setting decision, 1 First Word was permitted to use a non-animal alternative to test its fluoride toothpaste. Consumers can and do make a difference for animals. 16 Reducing Animal Testing Alternatives development is making great strides, especially in the areas of skin and eye 2 News safety testing. Update on Great Apes; Congress Acts to By Rodger Curren Crush Cruel Videos; Bias in Animal Studies. 24 AAVS Action 20 Product Testing: The Struggle in Europe Animal testing bans mean progress, but not paradise, in Europe. $30,000 awarded for education alternatives; Humane Student and Educator Awards; and By Michelle Thew Leaping Bunny’s high standards. 22 Laws and Animal Testing 26 Giving PRESIDENT’S REPORT: An interview with Sue Leary points out the influences that For now and into the future, supporting can help—or harm—animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrine Circus 2900 Rocky Point Dr., Tampa, FL 33607
    Shrine Circus 2900 Rocky Point Dr., Tampa, FL 33607 The Shrine Circus does not possess an animal exhibitor license from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The animals are leased from outside companies, including Tarzan Zerbini Circus,* George Carden Circus,* Jordan World Circus,* Hawthorn Corporation,* Royal Hanneford Circus,* Franzen Bros. Circus,* and Circus Hollywood,* so Shrine Circus is not subject to citations under its own name. Each Shrine Temple produces its own circus, so animal exhibits will vary from temple to temple and from year to year. Exhibitors of Shrine Circus–leased animals have failed to meet minimal federal standards for the care of animals used in exhibition as established in the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). The USDA has cited Shrine Circus exhibitors for failure to provide veterinary care, adequate shelter from the elements, nutritious food, and clean water. Exhibitors have also been cited for failure to handle animals in a manner that prevents trauma and harm to the animals and ensures public safety. Animals used by Shrine Circus have caused deaths and injuries. Contact PETA for documentation. April 9, 2010: An animal handler with the Hamid Circus was kicked and thrown approximately 20 feet by an African elephant named Dumbo between performances at the Irem Shrine Circus in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. The handler died at the scene from multiple traumatic injuries. The elephant had been leased from Joe Frisco’s Wonderful World of Animals. March 7, 2009: At least 15 children and one adult were injured when an elephant who was being used to give rides at the Murat Shrine Circus in Indianapolis, Indiana, became startled, stumbling and knocking over the scaffolding stairway leading to the elephant ride.
    [Show full text]