Crispin S. Guppy - March 31, 2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crispin S. Guppy - March 31, 2002 Living Landscapes - Past, Present & Future BUTTERFLY INVENTORY OF THE UPPER FRASER RIVER BASIN Crispin S. Guppy - March 31, 2002 Arthropods are animals with an external (rather than internal) skeleton and jointed legs. They include the insects, springtails, centipedes, millipedes, sow bugs, amphipods, spiders, mites, ticks, scorpions, and various smaller groups. There are about 70,000 species of insects and other terrestrial and fresh water arthropods in British Columbia, 10-20% of which have never been recorded from BC and many of which have never been scientifically described. These species range from microscopic mites living between grains of soil to large butterflies that fly thousands of miles in their life-span. The exact number is unknown, because the presence of many species has yet to be documented. The undocumented species are primarily species known from elsewhere in North America, but also include hundreds of species new to science. Butterflies are the most well documented insect group, and yet we still have insufficient information about many species to know whether their populations are stable, increasing or decreasing. The research required involves the collection of samples over many years in very large areas. Many people express the opinion that collecting of butterflies is no longer required, because “everything is known about butterflies”. For example: “I do not see that anything of consequence remains to be done, either in North America or Europe, with the butterflies, except to study their life-histories. Both continents have been well explored, and only now and then can a new species be found. … the study of the life history requires no special training. Anyone can take it up and follow it with a pleasure that rapidly becomes absorbing.” (Edwards 1884) The author of this statement was William Henry Edwards, the greatest expert on North American butterflies in the late nineteenth century. Despite his expertise, his statement was wrong, because there was (and is) still a tremendous number of butterfly species and subspecies to document in North America. The book Butterflies of British Columbia (Guppy and Shepard 2001) recognised 187 species and 264 subspecies in BC. An astonishing 48% of the subspecies have been described and named since Edwards declared that everything was known about butterflies except life-histories. Eleven of the subspecies were named in 2001 in Butterflies of British Columbia. However, Edwards was correct in suggesting that the study of life histories is very rewarding, very little is known of the life histories of the butterflies in the Central Interior of BC. Most of what is known was discovered elsewhere in the world, and there is no certainty that the information is applicable for this area. There are still a number of subspecies remaining unnamed in BC, mostly in the Central Interior and the Peace River. This purpose of this project was to gather sufficient information to describe and name some of these unnamed subspecies, and to further document where each butterfly species and subspecies occurs in the Upper Fraser River Basin (north, east and west of the junction of the Chilcotin River with the Fraser River). To complete this project will take many more years, because of the huge area involved. This project is one step in the acquisition of knowledge of the butterflies of this area. It has been supported by the Royal British Columbia Museum (Government of British Columbia) program titled “Living Landscapes: Upper Fraser Basin – Past, Present and Future”. Royal British Columbia Museum 1-250-356-7226 675 Belleville Street 1-888-447-7977 Victoria, British Columbia CANADA http://livinglandscapes.bc.ca Living Landscapes - Past, Present & Future Butterflies are small, and many are sedentary; many populations inhabit areas of a hectare or less. They do not always require large areas of suitable habitat, even small patches can be important. However some species, such as swallowtail butterflies, require large breeding areas because they fly a considerable distance between laying each egg or small group of eggs. Finding even a representative sample of these populations, so as to understand the overall range in which each butterfly species occurs, requires a sustained sampling effort. A recent project to inventory butterflies and moths near Riske Creek in the Chilcotin lasted two years, and collected a total of 29,689 identified specimens from 623 light trap and aerial net samples. There were 59 field days with an average of 10.6 samples per day. The total inventory cost was $95,000. A collection of each species was deposited in the Royal British Columbia Museum, and other specimens were distributed to the Canadian National Collection of Insects and Arthropods and other collections. A total of 45 species of butterflies and 473 species of the larger moths were found, and several hundred species of very small moths were never sorted and identified due to insufficient funding. Forty rarely seen moth species were recorded, including several specimens of one species that was previously known in the world only from a single male. The cost and intensity of the inventory, which produced presence/absence data and a correlation with habitat types for each species, are typical of what is required for inventory of butterflies and moths in northern BC. In this Living Landscapes project I restricted my research to butterflies, to reduce the costs in time and money. I inventoried butterflies throughout much of the Upper Fraser River Basin during the summer of 2001, travelling about 5,000 km by car. I also spent three days in Burns Lake in October 2001, assisting with RBCM public programming, and I will spend another three days of public programming in Quesnel in the spring of 2002. I also presented slide shows on butterflies to the Prince George Naturalists, the Annual General Meeting of the Federation of BC Naturalists in Williams Lake, the Quesnel Naturalists, the North Quesnel Neighborhood Association; and the Quesnel Garden Club. There were several notable findings, including: Thicket Hairstreak (Mitoura spinetorum) – I found two specimens west of Riske Creek, which is the second record from the Cariboo-Chilcotin. The other nearest records were Lillooet, Valemont, and Pine Pass. This is the second record from the Upper Fraser River Basin. European Skipper (Thymelicus lineola) – I recorded this species from a highway ditch west of Vanderhoof. It is an introduced European pest of timothy hay crops. This is the first record from the Upper Fraser River Basin. Western Elfin (Incisalia iroides) – an undescribed subspecies occurs only in the central interior. I greatly expanded its known distribution during this project (south to near 100 Mile House, north to near Fort St. James). I am currently writing a formal scientific paper to name this subspecies. Square-spotted Blue (Euphilotes battoides) – an undescribed subspecies from the Chilcotin. This subspecies appears to have a world distribution limited to a very small area near Riske Creek. I greatly increased my sample size of this subspecies, so that now that I have a reasonable sample size. I am describing and naming this subspecies. There are three other specimens of this subspecies in the collection of Norbert Kondla; otherwise I have all known specimens. The Jutta Arctic (Oeneis jutta), the Dorcas Copper (Epidemia dorcas), and the Atlantis Fritillary (Speyeria atlantis) have all been thought to be rare in the Central Interior. My collecting over the last several years, including this year, has shown that all three species are abundant and widely distributed in wetland habitats. The Jutta Arctic appears to be an unnamed subspecies, however I still need additional specimens to be certain of this. Royal British Columbia Museum 1-250-356-7226 675 Belleville Street 1-888-447-7977 Victoria, British Columbia CANADA http://livinglandscapes.bc.ca Living Landscapes - Past, Present & Future Common Branded Skipper (Hesperia comma) – an apparently unnamed subspecies, or perhaps distinct species, was discovered near Quesnel during this study. Further collecting and study is needed before it can be named. Butterflies in the genus Pieris were collected for systematic (DNA) study by other researchers. In addition butterflies were collected for DNA comparative studies of the family Lycaenidae, the genus Limenitis, and the genus Polygonia. Scientific papers will be published by researchers elsewhere in the world, over the next few years, using data from these specimens. Voucher specimens and associated data from this project are deposited in the entomology collections of the Royal British Columbia Museum in Victoria. A pictorial summary of the 97 species of butterflies of the Upper Fraser River Basin follows, with a summary of the new information gathered as part of this project. For further information on each butterfly please consult Butterflies of British Columbia (Guppy and Shepard 2001 – see the reference list below). Skippers, Family Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809 1. Northern Cloudywing, Thorybes pylades pylades (Scudder, 1870) Notes for the Upper Fraser River Basin Generally distributed south of Hwy 16, also occurs in the Robson Valley. Fly May to July. Inhabit low elevation natural meadows and open forests. Caterpillars feed on clover and other wild legumes. Male upper side Royal British Columbia Museum 1-250-356-7226 675 Belleville Street 1-888-447-7977 Victoria, British Columbia CANADA http://livinglandscapes.bc.ca Living Landscapes - Past, Present & Future 2. Dreamy Duskywing, Erynnis icelus (Scudder & Burgess, l870) Notes for the Upper Fraser River Basin Generally distributed south of Hwy 16, also occurs in the Robson Valley. Fly May to mid-July. Inhabit low elevation natural meadows and open forests. Caterpillars feed on willows. Male upper side 3. Persius Duskywing, Erynnis persius (Scudder, 1863) Notes for the Upper Fraser River Basin Generally distributed south of Hwy 16. Fly May to July. Inhabit low elevation natural meadows and open forests. Caterpillar foodplants are unknown for our area.
Recommended publications
  • Butterflies and Moths of Ada County, Idaho, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio Glaucus, P. Marcellus, P. Philenor, Pieris Rapae, Colias Philo Dice, Antho­ Caris Genutia, Anaea Andria, Euptychia Gemma
    102 REMINGTON: 1952 Central Season Vol.7, nos.3·4 Papilio glaucus, P. marcellus, P. philenor, Pieris rapae, Colias philo dice, Antho­ caris genutia, Anaea andria, Euptychia gemma. One exception to the general scarcity was the large number of Erynnis brizo and E. juvenalis which were seen clustered around damp spots in a dry branch on April 9. MERRITT counted 67 Erynnis and 2 Papilio glaucus around one such spOt and 45 Erynnis around another. Only one specimen of Incisalia henrici was seen this spring. MERRITT was pleased to find Incisalia niphon still present in a small tract of pine although the area was swept by a ground fire in 1951. Vanessa cardui appeared sparingly from June 12 on, the first since 1947. In the late summer the season appeared normal. Eurema lisa, Nathalis iole, Lycaena thoe, and Hylephila phyleus were common. Junonia coenia was more abundant around Louisville than he has ever seen it. A rarity taken in Louisville this fall was Atlides halesus, the first seen since 1948. The latest seasonal record made by Merritt was a specimen of Colias eury­ theme flying south very fast on December 7. EDWARD WELLING sent a record of finding Lagoa crispata on June 27 at Covington. Contributors: F. R. ARNHOLD; E. G. BAILEY; RALPH BEEBE; S. M. COX; H. V. DALY; 1. W . GRIEWISCH; J. B. HAYES; R. W. HODGES; VONTA P. HYNES; R. LEUSCHNER; J. R. MERRITT; J. H. NEWMAN; M. C. NIEL­ SEN; 1. S. PHILLIPS; P. S. REMINGTON; WM. SIEKER; EDWARD VOSS; W. H . WAGNER, JR.; E. C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator–Friendly Parks
    POLLINATOR–FRIENDLY PARKS How to Enhance Parks, Gardens, and Other Greenspaces for Native Pollinator Insects Matthew Shepherd, Mace Vaughan, and Scott Hoffman Black The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, Portland, OR The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation is an international, nonprofit, member–supported organiza- tion dedicated to preserving wildlife and its habitat through the conservation of invertebrates. The Society promotes protection of invertebrates and their habitat through science–based advocacy, conservation, and education projects. Its work focuses on three principal areas—endangered species, watershed health, and pollinator conservation. Copyright © 2008 (2nd Edition) The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. 4828 SE Hawthorne Boulevard, Portland, OR 97215 Tel (503) 232-6639 Fax (503) 233-6794 www.xerces.org Acknowledgements Thank you to Bruce Barbarasch (Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District, OR) and Lisa Hamerlynck (City of Lake Oswego, OR) for reviewing early drafts. Their guidance and suggestions greatly improved these guide- lines. Thank you to Eric Mader and Jessa Guisse for help with the plant lists, and to Caitlyn Howell and Logan Lauvray for editing assistance. Funding for our pollinator conservation program has been provided by the Bradshaw-Knight Foundation, the Bullitt Foundation, the Columbia Foundation, the CS Fund, the Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund, the Dudley Foundation, the Gaia Fund, NRCS Agricultural Wildlife Conservation Center, NRCS California, NRCS West National Technical Support Center, the Panta Rhea Foundation, the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Founda- tion, the Turner Foundation, the Wildwood Foundation, and Xerces Society members Photographs We are grateful to Jeff Adams, Scott Bauer/USDA–ARS, John Davis/GORGEous Nature, Chris Evans/ www.forestryimages.com, Bruce Newhouse, Jeff Owens/Metalmark Images, and Edward S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project
    Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project June 8, 2016 Prepared for: Nichols Road Partners, LLC P.O. Box 77850 Corona, CA 92877 Prepared by: Alden Environmental, Inc. 3245 University Avenue, #1188 San Diego, CA 92104 Nichols Road Mine Project Biological Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description ..............................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS & SURVEY LIMITATIONS .................................................................1 2.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................1 2.2 Biological Surveys ..............................................................................................2 2.2.1 Vegetation Mapping..................................................................................3 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Delineations of Waters of U.S. and Waters of the State ....4 2.2.3 Sensitive Species Surveys .........................................................................4 2.2.4 Survey Limitations ....................................................................................5 2.2.5 Nomenclature ............................................................................................5 3.0 REGULATORY
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 12 - Number 1 March 2005
    Utah Lepidopterist Bulletin of the Utah Lepidopterists' Society Volume 12 - Number 1 March 2005 Extreme Southwest Utah Could See Iridescent Greenish-blue Flashes A Little Bit More Frequently by Col. Clyde F. Gillette Battus philenor (blue pipevine swallowtail) flies in the southern two- thirds of Arizona; in the Grand Canyon (especially at such places as Phantom Ranch 8/25 and Indian Gardens 12/38) and at its rims [(N) 23/75 and (S) 21/69]; in the low valleys of Clark Co., Nevada; and infrequently along the Meadow Valley Wash 7/23 which parallels the Utah/Nevada border in Lincoln Co., Nevada. Since this beautiful butterfly occasionally flies to the west, southwest, and south of Utah's southwest corner, one might expect it to turn up now and then in Utah's Mojave Desert physiographic subsection of the Basin and Range province on the lower southwest slopes of the Beaver Dam Mountains, Battus philenor Blue Pipevine Swallowtail Photo courtesy of Randy L. Emmitt www.rlephoto.com or sporadically fly up the "Dixie Corridor" along the lower Virgin River Valley. Even though both of these Lower Sonoran life zone areas reasons why philenor is not a habitual pipevine species.) Arizona's of Utah offer potentially suitable, resident of Utah's Dixie. But I think interesting plant is Aristolochia "nearby" living conditions for Bat. there is basically only one, and that is watsonii (indianroot pipevine), which phi. philenor, such movements have a complete lack of its larval has alternate leaves shaped like a not often taken place. Or, more foodplants in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • A Reconnaissance of Population Genetic Variation in Arctic and Subarctic Sulfur Butterflies (Colias Spp.; Lepidoptera, Pieridae)
    1614 A reconnaissance of population genetic variation in arctic and subarctic sulfur butterflies (Colias spp.; Lepidoptera, Pieridae) Christopher W. Wheat, Ward B. Watt, and Christian L. Boutwell Abstract: Genotype–phenotype–environment interactions in temperate-zone species of Colias Fabricius, 1807 have been well studied in evolutionary terms. Arctic and alpine habitats present a different range of ecological, especially thermal, conditions under which such work could be extended across species and higher clades. To this end, we survey variation in three genes that code for phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI), phosphoglucomutase (PGM), and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) in seven arctic and alpine Colias taxa (one only for G6PD). These genes are highly polymor- phic in all taxa studied. Patterns of variation for the PGI gene in these northern taxa suggest that the balancing selec- tion seen at this gene in temperate-zone taxa may extend throughout northern North America. Comparative study of these taxa may thus give insight into the mechanisms driving genetic differentiation among subspecies, species, and broader clades, supporting the study of both micro- and macro-evolutionary questions. Résumé : L’étude des interactions génotype–phénotype–environnement chez les papillons Colias Fabricius, 1807 de la région tempérée s’est faite dans une perspective évolutive. Les habitats arctiques et alpins offrent une gamme différente de conditions écologiques et, en particulier, thermiques dans lesquelles un tel travail peut s’étendre au niveau des espè- ces et des clades supérieurs. Dans ce but, nous avons étudié la variation de trois gènes — ceux de la phosphoglucose isomérase (PGI), de la phosphoglucomutase (PGM) et de la glucose-6-phosphate déshydrogénase (G6PD) — chez sept taxons de Colias arctiques et alpins (un seul taxon pour G6PD).
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly and Punt Partners of the Butterfly Garden (K-6)
    BUTTERFLY AND PUNT PARTNERS OF THE BUTTERFLY GARDEN (K-6) Acmon Blue (Icaricia acmon) Non-migratory: Adults seen spring through fall Larval Diet: Buckwheat, lupine, clover and many kinds of legumes. Size: 3/4"-I" Description: Bluish-purple in color; orange edge at the base of hind wing; large orange spots under the hind wing. Adults seen in many communities. Did You Know? Eggs are laid on the host plant from January onward, and the butterflies pupate in leaf litter beneath the plants. larval stage feeds on: California Buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum) Origin: Native Plant Size: 1' - 2' tall shrub with long stalks Leaf Description: Small course leaves attached to long branching stems. The underside of the leaves are covered in a soft, white fuzz. Flower Description: Large compound head with white flowers. Blooms from March to October. Did you know? Buckwheat is one of the few acceptable food plants for the acmon blue butterfly. Echo Blue (Celastrina ladon echo) Non-migratory: However, its range extends from Alaska to Central America Larval Diet: Many different plants, including wild lilac/ceanothus, buckeye, chamise, lotus and huckleberry. Caterpillar's eat buds, flowers, leaves and young fruit. Size: 7/8"-1 1/4" Description: Light purple; front wing tips bordered in black; hind wings bordered in white. Can live in all local communities Did You Know? Larvae are often cared for by ants. larval stage feeds on: Ceanothus or Wild Lilac (Ceanothus spp.) Origin: Native Plant Size: Chaparral shrub can be 6' tall or more. Leaf Description: Small tough evergreen leaves on very stiff branches; brilliant glossy green above, dull below.
    [Show full text]
  • Дневные Бабочки (Lepidoptera: Papilionoformеs) Северного Тянь-Шаня
    Эверсманния . Энтомологические исследования Eversmannia в России и соседних регионах. Отдельный выпуск 3 15.VI.2012 Supplement No. 3. 2012 Светлой памяти Юрия Борисовича Косарева, хорошего человека и большого знатока бабочек, посвящается. С.К. Корб г. Нижний Новгород, Нижегородское отделение РЭО, Московское общество испытателей природы Дневные бабочки (Lepidoptera: Papilionoformеs) Северного Тянь-Шаня. Часть 1. Семейства Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Libytheidae, Satyridae S.K.Korb. Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoformеs) of the North Tian-Shan. Part 1. Families Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieri- dae, Libytheidae, Satyridae. SUMMARY. Proposed first part of the book about butterflies (series Papilionoformеs sensu Kusnetzov et Stekolnikov, 2001) of North Tian-Shan and includes data on the families Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae and Satyridae. For the every species and subspe- cies the original combination, type material data, information about ecology and distribution, figures of imagos and male genitalia, maps of distribution are given; in necessary cases the questions of systematics, nomenclature and geographic variability are clarified. For eve- ry species and part of subspecies the identification keys are submitted. The lectotypes for the following taxa are designated in this paper: Syrichtus antonia (Speyer, 1879), S. staudingeri (Speyer, 1879), S. nobilis (Staudinger, 1882), S. proteus (Staudinger, 1886), Spialia geron struvei (Püngeler, 1914), S. orbifer lugens (Staudinger, 1886), S. o. hilaris (Staudinger, 1901), Papilio machaon centralis Staudinger, 1886, Pieris canidia palaearctica (Staudinger, 1886), P. ochsenheimeri Staudinger, 1886, Сolias alta Staudinger, 1886, C. tamerlana Staudinger, 1897, Euchloe daphalis (Moore, 1865), Melanargia parce Staudinger, 1882, Disommata nolckeni (Erschoff, 1874), Chortobius tullia caeca (Staudinger, 1886), C. mahometanus (Alphéraky, 1881), Lyela myops (Staudinger, 1881), Erebia mopsos Staudinger, 1886, E. m.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Distribution and Biology of the Genus Cercyonis (Satyridae)
    1969 Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 165 TAXONOMY, DISTRIBUTION AND BIOLOGY OF THE GENUS CERCYONIS (SATYRIDAE). 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GENUS THOMAS C. EMMEL Department of Zoology, The University of Florida, Gainesville Evolution of butterflies in the satyrid genus Cercyonis has produced a complex of species groups and variable populations in North America that has not been reviewed thoroughly since the last century. The pur­ pose of this paper and others to follow in the series is to provide a critical, modern synthesis of taxonomic, distributional and biological information on all species and subspecies within the genus, based on extensive studies by the author from 1960 to the present. In future papers, each species group will be treated intensively, with plates of both sexes of adults of all subspecies, larvae, pupae, figures of eggs, genitalia, androconia, antennae and other important morphological characters, and chromosomes. Genetic data and hyblidization crosses will also be summarized in the present series from mateIial to be pub­ lished in full elsewhere. TAXONOMY The Nearctic genus Cercyonis has had over thirty specific, subspecif'ic, or varietal names applied to it, and no taxonomic revision has been at­ tempted since the 1880s (Edwards, 1880). On the basis of extensive field work, examination of over 5,000 adult C ercyonis specimens, rearing of many of the named forms, and studies of external and internal morphology of all these forms, the following new taxonomic treatment is proposed.l 1. Cercyonis sthenele (Boisduval, 1852) a. sthenele sthenele (Boisduval, 1852) b. sthenele silvestris (Edwards, 1861) c. sthenele paulus (Edwards, 1879) behrii (Grinnell, 19(5) d.
    [Show full text]
  • 6-7 15 March 2007
    Volume 6 Number 7 15 March 2007 The Taxonomic Report OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY A new subspecies of Colias gigantea from arctic Alaska (Pieridae) Jack L. Harry 47 San Rafael Court, West Jordan, Utah, United States of America 84088 Abstract: A new subspecies of Colias gigantea Strecker from the ‘north slope’ of Alaska is described. Additional key words: inupiat, philodice INTRODUCTION Field work in northern Alaska, United States of America has revealed that northern populations of Colias gigantea along the Dalton Highway are sufficiently distinct from the more southerly populations to merit recognition as a named subspecies. Colias gigantea inupiat Harry, new subspecies Description Males: Forewing length is 20 to 25 mm. Dorsal surfaces: Black border is medium to wide, black spot at end of forewing cell is reduced to absent. The hind wing discal cell spot is white to light orange. Basal dark overscaling is more extensive than C. g. gigantea. Ventral surfaces: The inner marginal area of forewing is yellow, occasionally becoming slightly lighter yellow. Hind wing with more greenish over-scaling and not as yellow as interior Alaska C. gigantea. Discal spot is red or white with red ring. Satellite spot is present or absent. No submarginal brown spots on hind wing. Females: Forewing length 23 to 26.5 mm. Dorsal surfaces: Ground color is creamy yellow to yellow. There is no border to a slight border, rarely a somewhat extensive border. Hind wing discal spot is orange. Basal area overscaling is more extensive than interior Alaska C. gigantea. Ventral surfaces are as in males. Type Specimens Holotype male: Alaska, Mile 323 Dalton Hwy, 68°59.01'N 148°49.94'W, 365 meters elevation, 28 June 2003 (Plate 1).
    [Show full text]