DOCSLIB.ORG

CDCA Final EIS for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CDCA Final EIS for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Final Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX A-1 IVANPAH SOLAR ELECTRIC GENERATING SYSTEM SUMMARY OF PUBLIC AND AGENCY COMMENTS ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) AND AGENCY RESPONSES JULY 2010 July 2010 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Final Environmental Impact Statement Key to Commentors Commentor ID # Affiliation Kevin Emmerich 1 Basin and Range Watch Ileene Anderson, Lisa T. Belenky 2 Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club San Gorgonio Chapter and Sidney Silliman 3 Desert Committee Scott Cashen 4 Sierra Club Gloria Smith 5 Senior Attorney, Sierra Club Kathleen M. Goforth 6 Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX Kim Delfino, Joshua Basofin 7 Defenders of Wildlife California District, Western Watershed Michael J. Connor, Ph.D. 8 Project Acting Regional Defense Council, National Rory D. Westberg 9 Park Service Joanna H. Walk, Alice Bond, Natural Resource Defense Council, The Alex Daue 10 Wilderness Society Greg Suba 11 California Native Plant Society Glenn R. Stewart 12 Desert Tortoise Council Steve Knight 13 Assemblyman, 36th Assembly District Anthony Adams 14 Assemblyman, 59th Assembly District Ann Vanino 15 Moving Forward Deleted 16 Comments not associated with the DEIS Richard Sierra, Jr. 17 Hod Carriers Local 783 Mike Vandeman, Ph.D 18 Pacbell Violette Roberst 19 Mojave Environmental Education Consortium J. Stephan Dolezalek 20 Vantage Point Venture Partners Brendan Hughes 21 Nancy Schultz 22 Rocco Davis 23 LiUNA! Pacific Southwest Regional Office Robin Kent 24 Sue Wainscott 25 Desert Conservation Program Laura Cunningham 26 Desert Ecologist, Basin and Range Watch County of San Bernardino, Land Use Carrie Hyke 27 Services Department Cindy MacDonald 28 CRM Deleted 29 Comments not associated with DEIS David Lamfrom 30 National Parks Conservation Association John L. Carrier 31 CH2MHill Mia P. Ratcliff 32 Clark County Department of Aviation Tom Budlong 33 Chris Clarke 34 Private Citizen Mass Mailing 35 A.1-1 July 2010 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Final Environmental Impact Statement Dennis Nowicki 36 Eileen Hennessy 37 Connie Conway 38 Assemblywoman, District 34 Glenn R. Stewart 39 The Desert Tortoise Council A.1-2 July 2010 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Final Environmental Impact Statement INTRODUCTION The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (Ivanpah SEGS) project was published in November, 2009, and the public comment period expired on February 11, 2010. The following sections have organized the comments into categories, in order to facilitate technical review, development of responses, and, where needed, revision to the text in the Final EIS. 1.0 GENERAL COMMENTS 1.1 General Sufficiency of DEIS Comment ISEGS-6-1: On January 16, 2008, EPA provided extensive formal scoping comments for the ISEGS Project which included a variety of detailed recommendations regarding purpose and need, range of alternatives, and resource areas of concern. Based on our review of the ISEGS DEIS, we have rated the document as Environmental Concerns - Insufficient Information (EC-2). Please see the enclosed "Summary of EPA Rating Definitions." In the enclosed detailed comments, EPA provides specific recommendations regarding analyses and documentation to assist in assessing potential significant impacts from the proposed ISEGS Project. Specifically, EPA is concerned with the: 1) current justification for the Project purpose, need, and independent utility; 2) range of alternatives; 3) impacts to biological and aquatic resources; 4) impacts to air quality; 5) impacts to endangered species and other species of concern; and, 6) cumulative impacts from reasonably foreseeable future actions. Comment ISEGS-6-2: While EPA is pleased with certain aspects of this Project including the use of dry cooling, the close proximity to current highway infrastructure, and a 5% maximum energy production cap on natural gas, EPA recommends that the forthcoming Supplemental DElS (SDElS) provide additional analyses (including any necessary supporting documentation) and identify specific minimization or mitigation measures, as appropriate, regarding the issue areas below. (Specific recommendations are included in the following detailed comments.) • Project Purpose, Need, and Independent Utility • Range of Alternatives • Biological and Aquatic Resources • Air Quality (including impacts from construction) • Endangered Species and Other Species of Concern • Cumulative Impacts (from reasonably foreseeable future actions) Response: BLM has reviewed and evaluated all public comments received on the Draft EIS (DEIS), and also evaluated information received through the California Energy Commission (CEC) hearing process. The Supplemental Draft EIS (SDEIS), published on April 16, was specifically developed to address many of the comments, including those associated with the Purpose and Need, the range of alternatives, and Biological Resources/endangered species. Other specific comments on cumulative impacts and A.1-3 July 2010 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Final Environmental Impact Statement air quality were evaluated, and are addressed through text modifications in their respective sections in the Final EIS (FEIS). 1.2 General Objection to Project Comment ISEGS-22-1: I oppose the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, it is a plan that does not fit the desert for three main reasons, the impacts to the fragile natural resources are too great, the amount of water needed is too great and a mitigation plan is not in place to address translocation, water depletion, and loss of public space. Comment ISEGS-11-1a: CNPS supports the development of alternative, green energy sources, as long as those projects do not unnecessarily degrade healthy, diverse ecosystems. The proposed ISEGS project will cause significant, avoidable, adverse impacts to native vegetation communities and significant impacts to rare plant populations on the site, and within the surrounding Ivanpah Valley area. These impacts will have permanent (i.e., effects will persist for thousands of years) effects on ecosystem functions that have been evolving within the Ivanpah Valley for millennia. The area within the proposed project footprint will be affected directly, and the areas surrounding the project footprint will be affected indirectly during project construction and operational phases. Response: The comments opposing the proposed project are appreciated. These comments were considered in the selection of the preferred alternative in the FEIS, and will be considered in the decision whether or not to issue a right-of-way grant in the Record of Decision. 1.3 General Support for Project Comment ISEGS-15-1: As a resident of the High Desert region, I am writing to express my support for Bright Source energy's Ivanpah project. The project represents a significant economic development opportunity for the High Desert region and a major step towards achieving our state's and nation's clean energy and economic goals. Comment ISEGS-14-4: California and the nation need BrightSource's Ivanpah SEGS project, and others like it, to launch a stronger, more independent and competitive economy that once again proudly leads the world. I ask that BLM and CEC undertake everything in their power to promptly approve and support the development of the Ivanpah SEGS project. Comment ISEGS-14-1: I am writing in support of Bright Source Energy's Ivanpah Solar Energy Generating System (ISEGS) project, and urge the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to promptly and successfully complete its permitting process. This utility-scale solar project will bring needed economic development and jobs to California's High Desert, including to my own district. By itself, the Ivanpah project is a great opportunity for our region; A.1-4 July 2010 Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Final Environmental Impact Statement importantly, it also represents the first major step in building the new solar industry that will greatly benefit our region. Comment ISEGS-13-4: California and the nation need BrightSource's Ivanpah SEGS project, and others like it, to launch a stronger, more independent and competitive economy that once again proudly leads the world. I ask that BLM and CEC promptly approve and support the development of the Ivanpah SEGS project. Comment ISEGS-13-1: Brightsource Energy's Ivanpah Solar Energy Generating System (ISEGS) project will bring needed economic development and jobs to California's High Desert, including my district. The project represents a tremendous opportunity for our region by itself, but is also an important first step in building the new solar industry that will greatly benefit our region. I support the Ivanpah SEGS project, and ask that the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) issue permits for its prompt development. Comment ISEGS-23-2: We understand the environmental challenges that a project such as Ivanpah presents, particularly given its large footprint, but those are challenges that are being thoroughly and deliberately worked out. BrightSource has adopted environmentally friendly strategies such as dry cooling to minimize water usage, and a low impact design to minimize impacts to the desert topography and plants. No short cuts are being taken with a project as important as this! We are confident that BrightSource is taking environmental responsibility very seriously
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake?
    Greentech Media http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/print/Are-DOE-Loan-Guarantee... RESEARCH & ANALYSIS | POLICY ERIC WESOFF: JUNE 2, 2011 Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake? It’s the Liberals versus the Libertarians: Is the DOE Loan Guarantee Program a righteous creator of jobs and new industry or a wrongful use of taxpayer money? The United States DOE Loan Guarantee Program has disbursed $30.7 billion and claims to have created or saved 62,350 jobs. The loan program has three categories: Section 1703 of Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 authorizes the DOE to support innovative clean energy technologies that are typically unable to obtain conventional private financing due to high technology risks. Section 1705 is a temporary program designed to address the current economic conditions of the nation. It authorizes loan guarantees for certain renewable energy systems, electric power transmission systems and leading edge biofuels projects that commence construction no later than September 30, 2011. The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program consists of direct loans to support the development of advanced technology vehicles and associated components in the U.S. The more publicized loan guarantee recipients include Solyndra , BrightSource Energy , Ford, Fisker , and Tesla. (See the more complete list of loan recipients at the end of this article.) The Loan Program Office (LPO) has issued conditional commitments to 13 power generation projects with cumulative project costs of over $27 billion. This represents a greater investment in clean energy generation projects than the entire private sector made in 2009 ($10.6 billion), and almost as much as was invested in such projects in 2008 -- the peak financing year to date ($22.6 billion), according to the DOE.
    [Show full text]
  • People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada
    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2012 People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Deborah Confer University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas and Confer, Deborah, "People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada" (2012). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/98 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series National Park Service Publication Number 2012-01 U.S. Department of the Interior PEOPLE OF SNOWY MOUNTAIN, PEOPLE OF THE RIVER: A MULTI-AGENCY ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND COMPENDIUM RELATING TO TRIBES ASSOCIATED WITH CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D. and Deborah Confer LAKE MEAD AND BLACK CANYON Doc Searls Photo, Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping Global Warming Within 1.5°C Constrains Emergence of Aridification
    ` Keeping global warming within 1.5°C constrains emergence of aridification Chang-Eui Park1, Su-Jong Jeong1*, Manoj Joshi2, Timothy J. Osborn2, Chang-Hoi Ho3, Shilong Piao4,5,6, Deliang Chen7, Junguo Liu1, Hong Yang8,9, Hoonyoung Park3, Baek-Min Kim10, Song Feng11 1School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech), Shenzhen, China 2Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK 3School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 4Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology and Biodiversity, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 5Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 6Center for Excellence in Tibetan Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden 8EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland 9Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 10Korea Polar Research Institution, Inchon, Korea 11Department of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 72701, AR, USA Nature Climate Change (Accepted) *Corresponding author: Prof. Su-Jong Jeong, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China ([email protected]) ` Aridity – the ratio of atmospheric water supply (precipitation; P) to demand (potential evapotranspiration; PET) – is projected to decrease (i.e., become drier) as a consequence of anthropogenic climate change, aggravating land degradation and desertification1-6. However, the timing of significant aridification relative to natural variability – defined here as the time of emergence for aridification (ToEA) – is unknown, despite its importance in designing and implementing mitigation policy7-10.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department Ofthe Interior
    United States Department ofthe Interior FISH AND Wll.DLIFE SERVICE Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office ·' 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Ventura, california 93003 Dl REPLY IUiFlIIlTO: Bl440-201G-F-D096 . 8-8-1G-F-24 , : October 1.2010 ,I DATE-, (CCTO 1 201/) ,1"_ - -.. ". ~ Memorandum. " REeD; (OCT :~ 8 201 To: District Manager, California Desert'District, Bureau ofLand Management, Morenoyalley. CalifO~ From: FielJ?~~v~ru:m FiSh and Wildlife Office. Ventura. California Subject: Biological Opinion on BrightSource Energy's Ivanpah Solar E;lectric Generating System Project, San Bernardino County. California [CACA-48668, 49502, 49503, 49504] (8-8-1O-F-24) This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion based on our review ofthe Bureau ofLand Management's (Bureau) proposed issuance ofa right-of­ way grant to Solar Partners I. LLC. Solar Partners II, LLC, and Solar Partners VIII. LLC for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) and its effects on the federally threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizil) in accordance with section 7 ofthe Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Because BrightSource Energy is a parent company for all Solar Partner Companies, this biological opiniO:J;l refers to the project proponents collectively as BrightSource. 'The proposed project involves construction, operation, maintenance,and decommissioning of a 370-megawatt solar thermal power plant and associated infrastructure and facilities on 3.5~2 acres ofpublic land managed by the Bureau. Your December 7, 2009 request for formal consultation was received on December 8, 2009. This biological opinion is based on information that accompanied your December 7, 2009 request for consultation and additional information regarding changes in the project description and tranSlocation strategy obtained from Bureau staff during the formal consultation p~ocess.
    [Show full text]
  • 04-Rasmussen-SW Hydrology 102209 Final.Pptx
    Utility Scale Solar: Reducing Risk for Utilities October 2009 1 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. Presentation Outline ØCorporate Overview Ø Energy Challenge Ø CSP Overview Ø Technology (R&D) Ø Development Ø Environment 2 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. BrightSource Energy Snapshot Mission: To design, build, own and operate the world’s most cost-effective and reliable large scale solar energy projects Ø Business: § Develop and build large-scale solar power generation plants for utilities at prices that compete with fossil-fuel plants, using proprietary LPT technology § Develop and build solar-to-steam plants for industrial applications Ø Locations: § Headquarters in Oakland, California, 52 full-time employees § Wholly-owned subsidiary BrightSource Industries Israel (BSII) located in Jerusalem, 112 full-time employees § Development offices in Phoenix, AZ and Las Vegas, NV 3 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. BrightSource Energy Highlights Ø Proven technology Ø Experienced management team Ø Favorable market and regulatory environment Ø 2.6 GWs of signed PPAs with PG&E and SCE Ø Bechtel as EPC, with a project investment agreement Ø Chevron solar-to-steam project under construction Ø 4 GWs of active site development with a 19 GW portfolio Ø $160 million from blue chip investor base 4 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. BrightSource Energy Renewable Power
    [Show full text]
  • Utilities Join the Party As Solar Power Goes Mainstream
    Release: 5th March 2019 Utilities join the party as solar power goes mainstream The list of the world’s top solar power plant owners released today by Wiki-Solar.org shows that leading energy utilities are building significant solar portfolios. Chinese, US and Indian power companies now have substantial solar capacity in their home markets, while European multinationals are building global portfolios. This marks a major shift – just five years ago there were only six utilities in the top thirty. The top solar generation owners, based on identified cumulative capacity to the end of 2018 were: Plant owners Plants Capacity Rank © wiki-solar.org number MWAC 1 State Power Investment Corporation [CN] 50 2,659 2 NextEra Energy [US] 43 2,627 3 Global Infrastructure Partners [US] 36 2,060 4 ENEL Green Power [IT] 33 2,015 5 Adani [IN] 28 1,957 6 Panda Green Energy [CN] 31 1,832 7 ACME [IN] 32 1,629 8 Southern Power [US] 25 1,494 9 National Thermal Power Corporation [IN] 15 1,391 10 AES Corporation [US] 60 1,301 11 Consolidated Edison Development [US] 25 1,256 12 EDF – Électricité de France [FR] 59 1,182 13 Dominion Energy [US] 42 1,153 14 Lightsource BP [GB] (part owned by BP) 149 1,102 15 Canadian Solar [CA] 28 1,100 16 Enerparc [DE] 141 1,076 17 Cypress Creek Renewables [US] 136 975 18 Sempra Energy [US] 13 941 19 GCL-Poly Energy Holdings [HK] 26 910 Top utility-scale solar generation capacity owners “Leading Chinese and US utilities like SPIC and NextEra have been prominent for some years” says Wiki-Solar founder Philip Wolfe, “while dynamic growth in India has brought utilities like Adani and NTPC into the list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of CSP Development
    The Status of CSP Development DISH STIRLING POWER TOWER CLFR Tom Mancini CSP Program Manager Sandia National Laboratories PARABOLIC TROUGH 505.844.8643 DISH STIRLING [email protected] [email protected] 1 Presentation Content • Brief Overview of Sandia National Laboratories • Background information • Examples of CSP Technologies − Parabolic Trough Systems − Power Tower Systems − Thermal Energy Storage − Dish Stirling Systems • Status of CSP Technologies • Cost of CSP and Resource Availability • Deployments • R & D Directions [email protected] 2 Four Mission Areas Sandia’s missions meet national needs in four key areas: • Nuclear Weapons • Defense Systems and Assessments • Energy, Climate and Infrastructure Security • International, Homeland, and Nuclear Security [email protected] 3 Research Drives Capabilities High Performance Nanotechnologies Extreme Computing & Microsystems Environments Computer Materials Engineering Micro Bioscience Pulsed Power Science Sciences Electronics Research Disciplines 4 People and Budget . On-site workforce: 11,677 FY10 operating revenue . Regular employees: 8,607 $2.3 billion 13% . Over 1,500 PhDs and 2,500 MS/MA 13% 43% 31% Technical staff (4,277) by discipline: (Operating Budget) Nuclear Weapons Defense Systems & Assessments Energy, Climate, & Infrastructure Security International, Homeland, and Nuclear Security Computing 16% Math 2% Chemistry 6% Physics 6% Other science 6% Other fields 12% Electrical engineering 21% Mechanical engineering 16% Other engineering 15% 5 Sandia’s NSTTF Dish Engine Engine Test Rotating Testing Facility Platform Established in 1976, we provide ………. • CSP R&D NSTTF • Systems analysis and FMEA • System and Tower Testing Solar Furnace component testing and support NATIONAL SOLAR THERMAL TEST FACILITY [email protected] 6 Labs Support the DOE Program The CSP Programs at Sandia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) support the DOE Solar Energy Technology Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Land Evaluation of Floodplains Under Conditions of Aridification Based on the Assessment of Ecosystem Services
    DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.69.3.1Lóczy, D. et al. HungarianHungarian Geographical Geographical Bulletin Bulletin 69 (2020) 69 2020 (3) 227–243. (3) 227–243.227 Perspectives of land evaluation of floodplains under conditions of aridification based on the assessment of ecosystem services Dénes LÓCZY1, Gergely TÓTH2, Tamás HERMANN2, Marietta REZSEK3, Gábor NAGY1, József DEZSŐ1, Ali SALEM3,4, Péter GYENIZSE1, Anne GOBIN5 and Andrea VACCA6 Abstract Global climate change has discernible impacts on the quality of the landscapes of Hungary. Only a dynamic and spatially differentiated land evaluation methodology can properly reflect these changes. The provision level, rate of transformation and spatial distribution of ecosystem services (ESs) are fundamental properties of landscapes and have to be integral parts of an up-to-date land evaluation. For agricultural land capability assessment soil fertility is a major supporting ES, directly associated with climate change through greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration as regulationg services. Since for Hungary aridification is the most severe consequence of climate change, water-related ESs, such as water retention and storage on and below the surface as well as control of floods, water pollution and soil erosion, are of increasing importance. The productivity of agricultural crops is enhanced by more atmospheric CO2 but restricted by higher drought susceptibility. The value of floodplain landscapes, i.e. their agroecological, nature conservation, tourism (aesthetic) and other potentials, however, will be increasingly controlled by their water supply, which is characterized by hydrometeorological parameters. Case studies are presented for the estimation of the value of two water-related regulating ESs (water retention and groundwater recharge capacities) in the floodplains of the Kapos and Drava rivers, Southwest Hungary.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Goals and Objectives
    Appendix C Biological Goals and Objectives Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C.1 Process for Developing the Biological Goals and Objectives This section outlines the process for drafting the Biological Goals and Objectives (BGOs) and describes how they inform the conservation strategy for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP or Plan). The conceptual model shown in Exhibit C-1 illustrates the structure of the BGOs used during the planning process. This conceptual model articulates how Plan-wide BGOs and other information (e.g., stressors) contribute to the development of Conservation and Management Actions (CMAs) associated with Covered Activities, which are monitored for effectiveness and adapted as necessary to meet the DRECP Step-Down Biological Objectives. Terms used in Exhibit C-1 are defined in Section C.1.1. Exhibit C-1 Conceptual Model for BGOs Development Appendix C C-1 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The BGOs follow the three-tiered approach based on the concepts of scale: landscape, natural community, and species. The following broad biological goals established in the DRECP Planning Agreement guided the development of the BGOs: Provide for the long-term conservation and management of Covered Species within the Plan Area. Preserve, restore, and enhance natural communities and ecosystems that support Covered Species within the Plan Area. The following provides the approach to developing the BGOs. Section C.2 provides the landscape, natural community, and Covered Species BGOs. Specific mapping information used to develop the BGOs is provided in Section C.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Radiometric Maps of Mountain Pass, California Purposes Only and Does Not Imply Endorsement by the U.S
    U.S. Department of the Interior Scientific Investigations Map 3412–C U.S. Geological Survey 115°35’ 115°30’ 115°25’ 115°35’ 115°30’ 115°25’ INTRODUCTION percent; for eTh, from −0.74 to 180.20 ppm, with a mean of 8.16 ppm; and for eU, from REFERENCES CITED −0.22 to 17.03 ppm, with a mean of 2.03 ppm. Negative concentrations were obtained Geophysical investigations of Mountain Pass, California, were conducted as part of DeWitt, E., Kwak, L.M., and Zartman, R.E., 1987, U-Th-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar dating of the 35°35’ EXPLANATION 35°35’ over water or some alluvial deposits. Verplanck and others (2014) provided a deposit an effort to study regional crustal structures as an aid to understanding the geologic Mountain Pass carbonatite and alkalic igneous rocks, southeastern California: 6a Quaternary alluvium model for carbonatite- and alkaline-intrusion-related REE mineralization, and they framework and mineral resources of the eastern Mojave Desert. The study area encom- Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, v. 19, no. 7, p. 642. Quaternary gravel described some of the geophysical tools used to assess these deposits. These radiogenic 5b passes Mountain Pass, which is host to one of the world’s largest rare earth element International Atomic Energy Agency, 2003, Guidelines for radioelement mapping using Granitic rocks, undivided features are briefly discussed below (from northwest to southeast), and their locations are 5a (REE) carbonatite deposits. The deposit is found along a north-northwest-trending, gamma-ray spectrometry data: International Atomic Energy Agency, Technical Ivanpah Valley labeled on the maps and figure 1 (for example, locs.
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Desertification in Iran
    hydrology Article Drought and Desertification in Iran Iraj Emadodin *, Thorsten Reinsch and Friedhelm Taube Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Group of Grass and Forage Science/Organic Agriculture, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24118 Kiel, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-431-880-1516 Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: Iran has different climatic and geographical zones (mountainous and desert areas), mostly arid and semi-arid, which are suffering from land degradation. Desertification as a land degradation process in Iran is created by natural and anthropogenic driving forces. Meteorological drought is a major natural driving force of desertification and occurs due to the extended periods of low precipitation. Scarcity of water, as well as the excessive use of water resources, mainly for agriculture, creates negative water balances and changes in plant cover, and accelerates desertification. Despite various political measures having been taken in the past, desertification is still a serious environmental problem in many regions in Iran. In this study, drought and aridity indices derived from long-term temperature and precipitation data were used in order to show long-term drought occurrence in different climatic zones in Iran. The results indicated the occurrence of severe and extremely severe meteorological droughts in recent decades in the areas studied. Moreover, the De Martonne Aridity Index (IDM) and precipitation variability index (PVI) showed an ongoing negative trend on the basis of long-term data and the conducted regression analysis. Rapid population growth, soil salinization, and poor water resource management are also considered as the main anthropogenic drivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Afforestation for Restoration of Land and Climate Change Mitigation
    Chapter 2 Afforestation for Restoration of Land and Climate Change Mitigation Authors Imre Berki András Bidló Áron Drüszler Attila Eredics Borbála Gálos Csaba Mátyás Norbert Móricz Ervin Rasztovits University of West Hungary Bajcsy-Zs, 4, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary University of West Hungary, Sopron, Hungary Chapter 2.1 Reforestation under climate change in temperate, water limited regions: current views and challenges Csaba Mátyás ABSTRACT reduce groundwater table level due to higher water use with consequences for water management. The forest/grassland transition zone is especially vulnerable to projected drastic temperature and precipitation shifts in the future. In spite of regional climate conditions is restricted. Ecologically conscious forest policy and management requires the consideration of local conditions, of projections of future climatic conditions and also of non-forest alternatives of land use. The chapter investigates some of the relevant aspects of the ecological role of forests at the dryland edges on the example of three countries/regions on three continents. 55 Chapter 2 1 INTRODUCTION In the drought-threatened regions of the Eurasian and North American forest steppe1 2 has been long considered as crucial in rehabilitating of degraded, over-exploited climatic conditions. resources are presently debated. Due to the limited understanding of interactions between physical processes and land cover, the dispute is still unresolved (Ellison et al. 2011), although the opinion prevails that in the forest steppe zone, water consumption not achieve the goals of environmental protection (Jackson et al., 2005; Sun et al., 2006; Andréassian, 2004; Brown et al., 2005; Wang, Y. et al., 2008). Projected changes in global climate pose a further challenge on dryland ecosystems, as relatively small changes in the moisture balance may lead to considerable ecological shifts.
    [Show full text]