14 Separation Techniques

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

14 Separation Techniques 14 SEPARATION TECHNIQUES 14.1 Introduction The methods for separating, collecting, and detecting radionuclides are similar to ordinary analytical procedures and employ many of the chemical and physical principles that apply to their nonradioactive isotopes. However, some important aspects of the behavior of radionuclides are significantly different, resulting in challenges to the radiochemist to find a means for isolation of a pure sample for analysis (Friedlander et al., 1981). While separation techniques and principles may be found in standard textbooks, Chapter 14 addresses the basic chemical principles that apply to the analysis of radionuclides, with an emphasis on their unique behavior. It is not a comprehensive review of all techniques. This chapter provides: (1) a review of the important chemical principles underlying radiochemical separations, (2) a survey of the important separation methods used in radiochemistry with a discussion of their advantages and disadvantages, and (3) an examination of the particular features of radioanalytical chemistry that distinguish it from ordinary analytical chemistry. Extensive examples have been provided throughout the chapter to illustrate various principles, practices, and procedures in radiochemistry. Many were selected purposely as familiar illustrations from agency procedural manuals. Others were taken from the classical and recent radiochemical literature to provide a broad, general overview of the subject. This chapter integrates the concepts of classical chemistry with those topics unique to radio- nuclide analysis. The first eight sections of the chapter describe the bases for chemical separations involving oxidation-reduction, complex-ion formation, distillation/volatilization, solvent extraction, precipitation and coprecipitation, electrochemistry, and chromatography. Carriers and tracers, which are unique to radiochemistry, are described in Section 14.9 together with specific separation examples for each of the elements covered in this manual. Section 14.10 also provides an overview of the solution chemistry Contents and appropriate separation techniques for 17 elements. An attachment at the end of the chapter 14.1 Introduction .................... 14-1 describes the phenomenon of radioactive 14.2 Oxidation-Reduction Processes ..... 14-2 equilibrium, also unique to radioactive materials. 14.3 Complexation .................. 14-18 14.4 Solvent Extraction .............. 14-25 14.5 Volatilization and Distillation ..... 14-36 Because the radiochemist detects atoms by their 14.6 Electrodeposition ............... 14-41 radiation, the success or failure of a radiochemical 14.7 Chromatography ............... 14-44 procedure often depends on the ability to separate 14.8 Precipitation and Coprecipitation . 14-56 extremely small quantities of radionuclides (e.g., 14.9 Carriers and Tracers ............ 14-82 10!6 to 10!12 g) that might interfere with detection 14.10 Analysis of Specific Radionuclides . 14-97 14.11 References ................... 14-201 of the analyte. For example, isolation of trace 14.12 Selected Bibliography .......... 14-218 quantities of a radionuclide that will not precipitate Attachment 14A Radioactive Decay and on its own with a counter-ion requires judicious Equilibrium .................. 14-223 JULY 2004 14-1 MARLAP Separation Techniques selection of a carrier and careful technique to produce a coprecipitate containing the pure radionuclide, free of interfering ions. In detection procedures, the differences in the behavior of radionuclides provide unique oppor- tunities not available in the traditional analytical chemistry of nonradioactive elements. Radio- nuclides often can be detected by their unique radiation regardless of the chemical form of the element. There is also a time factor involved because of the short half-lives of some radionuc- lides. Traditional procedures involving long digestion or slow filtration cannot be used for short- lived radionuclides, thereby requiring that rapid separations be developed. Another distinction is the hazards associated with radioactive materials. At very high activity levels, chemical effects of the radiation, such as decomposition of solvents (through radiolysis) and heat effects (caused by interaction of decay particles with the solution), can affect the procedures. Equally important, even at lower activity levels, is the radiation dose that the radiochemist can receive unless protected by shielding, ventilation, time, or distance. Even at levels where the health concerns are minimal, special care needs to be taken to guard against laboratory and equipment contamination. Moreover, the radiochemist should be concerned about the type and quantity of the waste generated by the chemical procedures employed, because the costs and difficulties associated with the disposal of low-level and mixed radioactive waste continue to rise (see Chapter 17, Waste Management in a Radioanalytical Laboratory). The past 10 years have seen significant improvements to some of the classical techniques as well as the development of new methods of radiochemical analysis. Knowledge of these analytical developments, as well as maintenance of a working familiarity with developing techniques in the radiochemistry field will further enhance the waste reduction effort. 14.2 Oxidation-Reduction Processes 14.2.1 Introduction Oxidation and reduction (redox) processes play an important role in radioanalytical chemistry, particularly from the standpoint of the dissolution, separation, and detection of analytes, tracers, and carriers. Ion exchange, solvent extraction, and solid-phase extraction separation techniques, for example, are highly dependent upon the oxidation state of the analytes. Moreover, most radiochemical procedures involve the addition of a carrier or isotope tracer. There must be complete equilibration (isotopic exchange) between the added isotope(s) and all the analyte species present in order to achieve quantitative yields. The oxidation number of a radionuclide can affect its chemical stability in the presence of water, oxygen, and other natural substances in solution; reactivity with reagents used in the radioanalytical procedure; solubility in the presence of other ions and molecules; and behavior in the presence of carriers and tracers. The oxidation numbers of radionuclides in solution and their susceptibility to change, because of natural or induced redox processes, are critical, therefore, to the physical and chemical behavior of MARLAP 14-2 JULY 2004 Separation Techniques radionuclides during these analytical procedures. The differences in mass number of all radionuclides of an element are so small that they will exhibit the same chemical behavior during radiochemical analysis (i.e., no mass isotope effects). 14.2.2 Oxidation-Reduction Reactions An oxidation-reduction reaction (redox reaction) is a reaction in which electrons are redistributed among the atoms, molecules, or ions in solution. In some redox reactions, electrons are actually transferred from one reacting species to another. Oxidation under these conditions is defined as the loss of electron(s) by an atom or other chemical species, whereas reduction is the gain of electron(s). Two examples will illustrate this type of redox reaction: +6 !1 U + 3 F2 6 U + 6 F Pu+4 + Fe+2 6 Pu+3 + Fe+3 In the first reaction, uranium loses electrons, becoming a cation (oxidized), and fluorine gains an electron (reduced), becoming an anion. In the second reaction, the reactants are already ions, but the plutonium cation (Pu+4) gains an electron, becoming Pu+3 (reduced), and the ferrous ion (Fe+2) loses an electron, becoming Fe+3 (oxidized). In other redox reactions, electrons are not completely transferred from one reacting species to another; the electron density of one atom decreases while it increases at another atom. The change in electron density occurs as covalent bonds (in which electrons are shared between two atoms) are broken or made during a chemical reaction. In covalent bonds between two atoms of different elements, one atom is more electronegative than the other atom. Electronegativity is the ability of an atom to attract electrons in a covalent bond. One atom, therefore, attracts the shared pair of electrons more effectively, causing a difference in electron density about the atoms in the bond. An atom that ends up bonded to a more electronegative atom at the end of a chemical reaction loses net electron density. Conversely, an atom that ends up bonded to a less electro- negative atom gains net electron density. Electrons are not transferred completely to other atoms, and ions are not formed because the electrons are still shared between the atoms in the covalent bond. Oxidation, in this case, is defined as the loss of electron density, and reduction is defined as the gain of electron density. When carbon is oxidized to carbon dioxide by oxygen: C + O2 6 CO2 the electron density associated with the carbon atom decreases, and that of the oxygen atoms increases, because the electronegativity of oxygen is greater than the electronegativity of carbon. In this example, carbon is oxidized and oxygen is reduced. Another example from the chemistry of the preparation of gaseous uranium hexafluoride (UF6) illustrates this type of redox reaction: JULY 2004 14-3 MARLAP Separation Techniques 3 UF4 + 2 ClF3 6 3 UF6 + Cl2 Because the order of electronegativity of the atoms increases in the order U < Cl < F, the uranium atom in uranium tetrafluoride (UF4) is oxidized further
Recommended publications
  • Tuning Wettability of Molten Lithium Via a Chemical Strategy for Lithium Metal Anodes
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12938-4 OPEN Tuning wettability of molten lithium via a chemical strategy for lithium metal anodes Shu-Hua Wang1, Junpei Yue1, Wei Dong1,2, Tong-Tong Zuo1,2, Jin-Yi Li1,2, Xiaolong Liu1, Xu-Dong Zhang1,2, Lin Liu1,2, Ji-Lei Shi 1,2, Ya-Xia Yin1,2 & Yu-Guo Guo 1,2* Metallic lithium affords the highest theoretical capacity and lowest electrochemical potential and is viewed as a leading contender as an anode for high-energy-density rechargeable 1234567890():,; batteries. However, the poor wettability of molten lithium does not allow it to spread across the surface of lithiophobic substrates, hindering the production and application of this anode. Here we report a general chemical strategy to overcome this dilemma by reacting molten lithium with functional organic coatings or elemental additives. The Gibbs formation energy and newly formed chemical bonds are found to be the governing factor for the wetting behavior. As a result of the improved wettability, a series of ultrathin lithium of 10–20 μm thick is obtained together with impressive electrochemical performance in lithium metal batteries. These findings provide an overall guide for tuning the wettability of molten lithium and offer an affordable strategy for the large-scale production of ultrathin lithium, and could be further extended to other alkali metals, such as sodium and potassium. 1 CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Nanostructure and Nanotechnology, CAS Research/Education Center for Excellence in Molecular Sciences, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 100190 Beijing, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory Size (Ml Or G) 103220 Dimethyl Sulfate 77-78-1 500 Ml
    Inventory Bottle Size Number Name CAS# (mL or g) Room # Location 103220 Dimethyl sulfate 77-78-1 500 ml 3222 A-1 Benzonitrile 100-47-0 100ml 3222 A-1 Tin(IV)chloride 1.0 M in DCM 7676-78-8 100ml 3222 A-1 103713 Acetic Anhydride 108-24-7 500ml 3222 A2 103714 Sulfuric acid, fuming 9014-95-7 500g 3222 A2 103723 Phosphorus tribromide 7789-60-8 100g 3222 A2 103724 Trifluoroacetic acid 76-05-1 100g 3222 A2 101342 Succinyl chloride 543-20-4 3222 A2 100069 Chloroacetyl chloride 79-04-9 100ml 3222 A2 10002 Chloroacetyl chloride 79-04-9 100ml 3222 A2 101134 Acetyl chloride 75-36-5 500g 3222 A2 103721 Ethyl chlorooxoacetate 4755-77-5 100g 3222 A2 100423 Titanium(IV) chloride solution 7550-45-0 100ml 3222 A2 103877 Acetic Anhydride 108-24-7 1L 3222 A3 103874 Polyphosphoric acid 8017-16-1 1kg 3222 A3 103695 Chlorosulfonic acid 7790-94-5 100g 3222 A3 103694 Chlorosulfonic acid 7790-94-5 100g 3222 A3 103880 Methanesulfonic acid 75-75-2 500ml 3222 A3 103883 Oxalyl chloride 79-37-8 100ml 3222 A3 103889 Thiodiglycolic acid 123-93-3 500g 3222 A3 103888 Tetrafluoroboric acid 50% 16872-11-0 1L 3222 A3 103886 Tetrafluoroboric acid 50% 16872-11-0 1L 3222 A3 102969 sulfuric acid 7664-93-9 500 mL 2428 A7 102970 hydrochloric acid (37%) 7647-01-0 500 mL 2428 A7 102971 hydrochloric acid (37%) 7647-01-0 500 mL 2428 A7 102973 formic acid (88%) 64-18-6 500 mL 2428 A7 102974 hydrofloric acid (49%) 7664-39-3 500 mL 2428 A7 103320 Ammonium Hydroxide conc.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocols and Tips in Protein Purification
    Department of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology Protocols and tips in protein purification or How to purify protein in one day Second edition 2018 2 Contents I. Introduction 7 II. General sequence of protein purification procedures 9 Preparation of equipment and reagents 9 Preparation and use of stock solutions 10 Chromatography system 11 Preparation of chromatographic columns 13 Preparation of crude extract (cell free extract or soluble proteins fraction) 17 Pre chromatographic steps 18 Chromatographic steps 18 Sequence of operations during IEC and HIC 18 Ion exchange chromatography (IEC) 19 Hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) 21 Gel filtration (SEC) 22 Affinity chromatography 24 Purification of His-tagged proteins 25 Purification of GST-tagged proteins 26 Purification of MBP-tagged proteins 26 Low affinity chromatography 26 III. “Common sense” strategy in protein purification 27 General principles and tips in “common sense” strategy 27 Algorithm for development of purification protocol for soluble over expressed protein 29 Brief scheme of purification of soluble protein 36 Timing for refined purification protocol of soluble over -expressed protein 37 DNA-binding proteins 38 IV. Protocols 41 1. Preparation of the stock solutions 41 2. Quick and effective cell disruption and preparation of the cell free extract 42 3. Protamin sulphate (PS) treatment 43 4. Analytical ammonium sulphate cut (AM cut) 43 5. Preparative ammonium sulphate cut 43 6. Precipitation of proteins by ammonium sulphate 44 7. Recovery of protein from the ammonium sulphate precipitate 44 8. Analysis of solubility of expression 45 9. Analysis of expression for low expressed His tagged protein 46 10. Bio-Rad protein assay Sveta’s easy protocol 47 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy
    Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy Introduction Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) is one of the so-called hyphenated analytical techniques. As the name implies, it is actually two techniques that are combined to form a single method of analyzing mixtures of chemicals. Gas chromatography separates the components of a mixture and mass spectroscopy characterizes each of the components individually. By combining the two techniques, an analytical chemist can both qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate a solution containing a number of chemicals. Gas Chromatography In general, chromatography is used to separate mixtures of chemicals into individual components. Once isolated, the components can be evaluated individually. In all chromatography, separation occurs when the sample mixture is introduced (injected) into a mobile phase. In liquid chromatography (LC), the mobile phase is a solvent. In gas chromatography (GC), the mobile phase is an inert gas such as helium. The mobile phase carries the sample mixture through what is referred to as a stationary phase. The stationary phase is usually a chemical that can selectively attract components in a sample mixture. The stationary phase is usually contained in a tube of some sort called a column. Columns can be glass or stainless steel of various dimensions. The mixture of compounds in the mobile phase interacts with the stationary phase. Each compound in the mixture interacts at a different rate. Those that interact the fastest will exit (elute from) the column first. Those that interact slowest will exit the column last. By changing characteristics of the mobile phase and the stationary phase, different mixtures of chemicals can be separated.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Ray-Based Spectroscopic Techniques for Characterization of Polymer Nanocomposite Materials at a Molecular Level
    polymers Review X-ray-Based Spectroscopic Techniques for Characterization of Polymer Nanocomposite Materials at a Molecular Level 1, 2,3, 1 4, 1, Dongwan Son y, Sangho Cho y , Jieun Nam , Hoik Lee * and Myungwoong Kim * 1 Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea; [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (J.N.) 2 Materials Architecturing Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Korea; [email protected] 3 Division of Nano & Information Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology, Seoul 02792, Korea 4 Research Institute of Industrial Technology Convergence, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Ansan 15588, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (M.K.) These authors equally contributed to this work. y Received: 3 April 2020; Accepted: 23 April 2020; Published: 4 May 2020 Abstract: This review provides detailed fundamental principles of X-ray-based characterization methods, i.e., X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure, and the development of different techniques based on the principles to gain deeper understandings of chemical structures in polymeric materials. Qualitative and quantitative analyses enable obtaining chemical compositions including the relative and absolute concentrations of specific elements and chemical bonds near the surface of or deep inside the material of interest. More importantly, these techniques help us to access the interface of a polymer and a solid material at a molecular level in a polymer nanocomposite. The collective interpretation of all this information leads us to a better understanding of why specific material properties can be modulated in composite geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Catalysis in the 21St Century
    Opportunities for Catalysis in The 21st Century A Report from the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUBPANEL WORKSHOP REPORT Opportunities for Catalysis in the 21st Century May 14-16, 2002 Workshop Chair Professor J. M. White University of Texas Writing Group Chair Professor John Bercaw California Institute of Technology This page is intentionally left blank. Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................... v A Grand Challenge....................................................................................................... v The Present Opportunity .............................................................................................. v The Importance of Catalysis Science to DOE.............................................................. vi A Recommendation for Increased Federal Investment in Catalysis Research............. vi I. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 A. Background, Structure, and Organization of the Workshop .................................. 1 B. Recent Advances in Experimental and Theoretical Methods ................................ 1 C. The Grand Challenge ............................................................................................. 2 D. Enabling Approaches for Progress in Catalysis ..................................................... 3 E. Consensus Observations and Recommendations..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Phase Chemical Evolution of Uranium, Aluminum, and Iron Oxides Received: 22 January 2018 Batikan Koroglu1, Scott Wagnon 1, Zurong Dai1, Jonathan C
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Gas Phase Chemical Evolution of Uranium, Aluminum, and Iron Oxides Received: 22 January 2018 Batikan Koroglu1, Scott Wagnon 1, Zurong Dai1, Jonathan C. Crowhurst1, Accepted: 19 June 2018 Michael R. Armstrong1, David Weisz1, Marco Mehl1,2, Joseph M. Zaug1, Harry B. Radousky1 & Published: xx xx xxxx Timothy P. Rose1 We use a recently developed plasma-fow reactor to experimentally investigate the formation of oxide nanoparticles from gas phase metal atoms during oxidation, homogeneous nucleation, condensation, and agglomeration processes. Gas phase uranium, aluminum, and iron atoms were cooled from 5000 K to 1000 K over short-time scales (∆t < 30 ms) at atmospheric pressures in the presence of excess oxygen. In-situ emission spectroscopy is used to measure the variation in monoxide/atomic emission intensity ratios as a function of temperature and oxygen fugacity. Condensed oxide nanoparticles are collected inside the reactor for ex-situ analyses using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM, TEM) to determine their structural compositions and sizes. A chemical kinetics model is also developed to describe the gas phase reactions of iron and aluminum metals. The resulting sizes and forms of the crystalline nanoparticles (FeO-wustite, eta-Al2O3, UO2, and alpha-UO3) depend on the thermodynamic properties, kinetically-limited gas phase chemical reactions, and local redox conditions. This work shows the nucleation and growth of metal oxide particles in rapidly-cooling gas is closely coupled to the kinetically-controlled chemical pathways for vapor-phase oxide formation. Gas phase nucleation and growth of metal oxide nanoparticles is an important topic for many areas of chemistry, physics, material science, and engineering1–6.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
    qualitative and quantitative analysis Russian scientist Tswett in 1906 used a glass columns packed with divided CaCO3(calcium carbonate) to separate plant pigments extracted by hexane. The pigments after separation appeared as colour bands that can come out of the column one by one. Tswett was the first to use the term "chromatography" derived from two Greek words "Chroma" meaning color and "graphein" meaning to write. Invention of Chromatography by M. Tswett Ether Chromatography Colors Chlorophyll CaCO3 5 *Definition of chromatography *Tswett (1906) stated that „chromatography is a method in which the components of a mixture are separated on adsorbent column in a flowing system”. *IUPAC definition (International Union of pure and applied Chemistry) (1993): Chromatography is a physical method of separation in which the components to be separated are distributed between two phases, one of which is stationary while the other moves in a definite direction. *Principles of Chromatography * Any chromatography system is composed of three components : * Stationary phase * Mobile phase * Mixture to be separated The separation process occurs because the components of mixture have different affinities for the two phases and thus move through the system at different rates. A component with a high affinity for the mobile phase moves quickly through the chromatographic system, whereas one with high affinity for the solid phase moves more slowly. *Forces Responsible for Separation * The affinity differences of the components for the stationary or the mobile phases can be due to several different chemical or physical properties including: * Ionization state * Polarity and polarizability * Hydrogen bonding / van der Waals’ forces * Hydrophobicity * Hydrophilicity * The rate at which a sample moves is determined by how much time it spends in the mobile phase.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Intensification in the Synthesis of Organic Esters : Kinetics
    PROCESS INTENSIFICATION IN THE SYNTHESIS OF ORGANIC ESTERS: KINETICS, SIMULATIONS AND PILOT PLANT EXPERIMENTS By Venkata Krishna Sai Pappu A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chemical Engineering 2012 ABSTRACT PROCESS INTENSIFICATION IN THE SYNTHESIS OF ORGANIC ESTERS: KINETICS, SIMULATIONS AND PILOT PLANT EXPERIMENTS By Venkata Krishna Sai Pappu Organic esters are commercially important bulk chemicals used in a gamut of industrial applications. Traditional routes for the synthesis of esters are energy intensive, involving repeated steps of reaction typically followed by distillation, signifying the need for process intensification (PI). This study focuses on the evaluation of PI concepts such as reactive distillation (RD) and distillation with external side reactors in the production of organic acid ester via esterification or transesterification reactions catalyzed by solid acid catalysts. Integration of reaction and separation in one column using RD is a classic example of PI in chemical process development. Indirect hydration of cyclohexene to produce cyclohexanol via esterification with acetic acid was chosen to demonstrate the benefits of applying PI principles in RD. In this work, chemical equilibrium and reaction kinetics were measured using batch reactors for Amberlyst 70 catalyzed esterification of acetic acid with cyclohexene to give cyclohexyl acetate. A kinetic model that can be used in modeling reactive distillation processes was developed. The kinetic equations are written in terms of activities, with activity coefficients calculated using the NRTL model. Heat of reaction obtained from experiments is compared to predicted heat which is calculated using standard thermodynamic data. The effect of cyclohexene dimerization and initial water concentration on the activity of heterogeneous catalyst is also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Characterization of Uranium(VI) Sorption Complexes on Iron(III)-Rich Acid Mine Water Colloids
    Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 (2006) 5469–5487 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca Molecular characterization of uranium(VI) sorption complexes on iron(III)-rich acid mine water colloids Kai-Uwe Ulrich a,*, Andre´ Rossberg a,b, Harald Foerstendorf a, Harald Za¨nker a, Andreas C. Scheinost a,b a Institute of Radiochemistry, FZ Rossendorf e.V., P.O. Box 510119, D-01314 Dresden, Germany b Rossendorf Beamline at ESRF, B.P. 220, F-38043 Grenoble, France Received 7 November 2005; accepted in revised form 21 August 2006 Abstract A mixing of metal-loaded acid mine drainage with shallow groundwater or surface waters usually initiates oxidation and/or hydrolysis of dissolved metals such as iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al). Colloidal particles may appear and agglomerate with increasing pH. Likewise chemical conditions may occur while flooding abandoned uranium mines. Here, the risk assessment of hazards requires reliable knowl- edge on the mobility of uranium (U). A flooding process was simulated at mesocosm scale by mixing U-contaminated acid mine water with near-neutral groundwater under oxic conditions. The mechanism of U-uptake by fresh precipitates and the molecular structure of U bonding were determined to estimate the mobility of U(VI). Analytical and spectroscopic methods such as Extended X-ray Absorption Fine-Structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy at the Fe K-edge and the U LIII-edge, and Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infra- red (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy were employed. The freshly formed precipitate was identified as colloidal two-line ferrihydrite. It removed U(VI) from solution by sorption processes, while surface precipitation or structural incorporation of U was not observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rate Constants for Reactions Between Iodine- and Chlorine-Containing Species: a Detailed Mechanism of the Chlorine Dioxide/Chlorite-Iodide Reaction†
    3708 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3708-3719 Rate Constants for Reactions between Iodine- and Chlorine-Containing Species: A Detailed Mechanism of the Chlorine Dioxide/Chlorite-Iodide Reaction† Istva´n Lengyel,‡ Jing Li, Kenneth Kustin,* and Irving R. Epstein Contribution from the Department of Chemistry and Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis UniVersity, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254-9110 ReceiVed NoVember 27, 1995X Abstract: The chlorite-iodide reaction is unusual because it is substrate-inhibited and autocatalytic. Because - analytically pure ClO2 ion is not easily prepared, it was generated in situ from the rapid reaction between ClO2 and I-. The resulting overall reaction is multiphasic, consisting of four separable parts. Sequentially, beginning with mixing, these parts are the (a) chlorine dioxide-iodide, (b) chlorine(III)-iodide, (c) chlorine(III)-iodine, and (d) hypoiodous and iodous acid disproportionation reactions. The overall reaction has been studied experimentally and by computer simulation by breaking it down into a set of kinetically active subsystems and three rapidly established - equilibria: protonations of chlorite and HOI and formation of I3 . The subsystems whose kinetics and stoichiometries were experimentally measured, remeasured, or which were previously experimentally measured include oxidation of - iodine(-1,0,+1,+3) by chlorine(0,+1,+3), oxidation of I by HIO2, and disproportionation of HOI and HIO2. The final mechanism and rate constants of the overall reaction and of its subsystems were determined by sensitivity analysis and parameter fitting of differential equation systems. Rate constants determined for simpler reactions were fixed in the more complex systems. A 13-step model with the three above-mentioned rapid equilibria fits the - -3 - -3 - - overall reaction and all of its subsystems over the range [I ]0 < 10 M, [ClO2 ]0 < 10 M, [I ]0/[ClO2 ]0 ) 3-5, pH ) 1-3.5, and 25 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet Material Name: HFCL4 SDS ID: 00227583P
    Safety Data Sheet Material Name: HFCL4 SDS ID: 00227583P Section 1 - PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION Material Name HFCL4 Synonyms HAFNIUM TETRACHLORIDE; HAFNIUM (IV) CHLORIDE; (T-4) HAFNIUM CHLORIDE (HfCl4); HAFNIUM CHLORIDE; Cl4Hf Chemical Family metal, halides Product Use semiconductor manufacture Restrictions on Use None known Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Entegris, Inc. 129 Concord Road Building 2 Billerica, MA 01821 USA Telephone Number: +1-952-556-4181 Telephone Number: +1-800-394-4083 (toll free within North America) Emergency Telephone Number: CHEMTREC - U.S. - 1-800-424-9300 CHEMTREC - Intl. - 1-703-527-3887 E-mail: [email protected] Section 2 - HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Classification in accordance with paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1910.1200. Combustible Dust Skin Corrosion/Irritation - Category 1B Serious Eye Damage/Eye Irritation - Category 1 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure - Category 3 ( respiratory system ) GHS Label Elements Symbol(s) Signal Word Danger Hazard Statement(s) ____________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 9 Issue date: 2021-05-11 Revision 6.0 Print date: 2021-05-12 Safety Data Sheet Material Name: HFCL4 SDS ID: 00227583P May form combustible dust concentrations in air. Causes severe skin burns and eye damage. May cause respiratory irritation. Precautionary Statement(s) Prevention Do not breathe dust. Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection. Wash thoroughly after handling. Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area. Response Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. Specific treatment may be needed, see first aid section of Safety Data Sheet.
    [Show full text]