Organic Remains in Late Palaeoproterozoic Granular Iron Formations 2 and Implications for the Origin of Granules
1 Organic remains in late Palaeoproterozoic granular iron formations 2 and implications for the origin of granules 3 Matthew S Dodda,b, Dominic Papineaua,b, Zhenbing Shec, Marilyn L. Fogeld, Sandra 4 Nederbragte, Franco Pirajnof, 5 aLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, 17-19 Gordon Street, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK. 6 bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. 7 cSchool of Earth Sciences & State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Biology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 8 China. 9 dDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside 900 University Ave. Riverside, CA 92521, USA 10 eSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff Univeristy, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK. 11 fCentre for Exploration Targeting, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009 12 Australia 13 14 Keywords: iron formation, Proterozoic, microfossil, carbon isotopes, granules 15 Toward the end of the Palaeoproterozoic era, over 109 billion tonnes of banded (BIF) and 16 granular (GIF) iron formations were deposited on continental platforms. Granules in iron 17 formations are typically sub-spherical structures 0.2 to 10 mm in size, whereas concretions 18 are larger than 10mm. Both types of spheroids are preserved throughout the 19 sedimentological record. Their formation has typically been interpreted to originate from 20 reworked Fe-rich sediments in high-energy, wave-agitated, shallow-marine environments. 21 New evidence from six different late Palaeoproterozoic granular iron formations (GIF), 22 however, suggests that some granules are the result of diagenetic reactions, in addition to 23 other features driven by microbial processes and mechanical movements.
[Show full text]