DOCSLIB.ORG

SDP SEA Scoping Rpt V0 1 DRAFT for Review-PM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SDP SEA Scoping Rpt V0 1 DRAFT for Review-PM Defence Equipment and Support Submarine Dismantling Project Intermediate-Level Waste Storage Site Selection: Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report February 2014 Jacobs document control sheet BPP 04 F8 version 15; Mar 2013 Project: SDP ILW Storage Client: Ministry of Defence Project No: B4160003 Document title: ILW Storage Site Selection: Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report Ref. No: B4160003-R01 REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS Approved by document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE Document status REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS Approved by document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE Document status Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs has been made. No liability is accepted by Jacobs for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Following final delivery of this document to the Client, Jacobs will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this document. This document has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this document. Should the Client wish to release this document to a third party, Jacobs may, at its discretion, agree to such release provided that (a) Jacobs’ written agreement is obtained prior to such release; and (b) by release of the document to the third party, that third party does not acquire any rights, contractual or otherwise, whatsoever against Jacobs and Jacobs, accordingly, assume no duties, liabilities or obligations to that third party; and (c) Jacobs accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred by the Client or for any conflict of Jacobs’ interests arising out of the Client's release of this document to the third party. Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Context ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Requirement for SEA .............................................................................................. 2 1.4 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................ 3 1.5 ILW storage Scoping Report Structure .................................................................... 3 1.6 How to Comment on this Scoping Report and Key Questions ................................. 4 2 The Submarine Dismantling Project ............................................................................... 6 2.1 Background............................................................................................................. 6 2.2 2011 SEA and Public Consultation ......................................................................... 7 2.3 Aim and Scope of the Current Stage of the SDP ..................................................... 7 2.4 Shortlisted Sites for ILW Storage .......................................................................... 10 2.5 Key Aspects of Implementing ILW Storage ........................................................... 12 3 Approach to Scoping the SEA ...................................................................................... 13 3.1 Stages of SEA ...................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Elements of SEA Scoping ..................................................................................... 13 3.3 Information Used to Set the Scope ....................................................................... 14 3.4 Habitats Regulations Assessment ......................................................................... 14 3.5 SEA Categories .................................................................................................... 15 4 Review of Plans, Programmes and Environmental Protection Objectives .................... 17 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Updates since the 2011 SEA ................................................................................ 17 5 Baseline Information and Local Context ....................................................................... 19 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Baseline Context for All Nuclear-Licensed Sites ................................................... 19 5.3 AWE Aldermaston................................................................................................. 20 5.4 AWE Burghfield .................................................................................................... 32 5.5 Capenhurst (Capenhurst Nuclear Services) .......................................................... 40 5.6 Sellafield (NDA) .................................................................................................... 49 5.7 Chapelcross (NDA) ............................................................................................... 59 5.8 Summary of Key Issues and Opportunities at Each Site ....................................... 67 6 Proposed Scope of the SEA......................................................................................... 69 6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 69 6.2 Technical Scope ................................................................................................... 69 6.3 Assessment Timescales ....................................................................................... 77 6.4 Geographic Scope ................................................................................................ 78 Intermediate-Level Waste Storage Site Selection: Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report 7 Next Steps ................................................................................................................... 79 7.1 SEA Scoping ......................................................................................................... 79 7.2 Purpose and Proposed Structure of the Environmental Report ............................. 79 7.3 Public Consultation on the SDP and Environmental Report .................................. 80 Annex 1: Statutory and Governmental Department Comments on ILW Storage from the Previous SEA.................................................................................................... 81 Annex 2: Maps of Alternative Sites and Key Environmental Features .............................. 82 Annex 3: Key Environmental Protection Objectives .......................................................... 93 Annex 4: Rationale for Amendment of the SEA Objectives and Guiding Questions ........ 103 Annex 5: Rationale for the SEA Technical Scope ........................................................... 112 Annex 6: Guideline Assessment Criteria by SEA Category ............................................ 128 Annex 7: SEA Scoping Quality Assurance Checklist ...................................................... 139 Intermediate-Level Waste Storage Site Selection: Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview The overarching objective of the Submarine Dismantling Project (SDP) is to develop and implement a timely solution for the dismantling and ultimate disposal of the UK’s 27 defueled nuclear submarines at the end of their life. This report presents the proposed scope of the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the transportation and interim storage of the submarine Reactor Pressure Vessels (RPVs) as part of the SDP. This SEA builds upon the previous, overarching 2011/12 SEA which considered the end-to-end process of submarine dismantling but was not able to consider any specific
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mortimer Heritage Trail
    Mortimer Heritage Trail Walk 2: Mortimer Common 3km (2.25 miles) This second of two moderate walks identifying interesting properties and places covers Mortimer Common, the newer part of the village, with homes being built mainly after 1880. Until then it had grown gorse and birch but not much else, the gravel soil being useless for agriculture. The Enclosure Acts from earlier that century had put the Common into private ownership. Housebuilding started slowly with existing ‘squatter’ cottages in Longmoor, Groves Corner and Summerlug being joined by a few more. West End House and Briar Lea House were the only sizeable properties by 1840. After land sales in 1870-71, house building started in earnest from about 1880 including in Windmill Road, Victoria Road and King Street (named after Mr King the baker), the population growing rapidly from the early 1900s. We start at the Community Centre car park, marked (1) on the red route on page 4, in the Fairground. The Fairground, is designated as an open space amenity. Today this is where travelling fairs and circuses come and village events are held. In the past, it has been used for gymkhanas, which have attracted Royal participants. Earlier still cattle and horse fairs were held there with animals being driven along Welshman’s Road allegedly from Wales but more likely from the railway sidings at Padworth. The Horse and Groom pub opposite would have been the oldest pub in the village had it remained in its original 17th century half-timbered building. The present pub was built adjacent, the original becoming a butcher’s shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5 Severe Weather and Other Emergencies
    HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN VOLUME 5 SEVERE WEATHER AND OTHER EMERGENCIES Neighbourhood Services, Wokingham Borough Council, PO Box 153, Council Offices, Shute End, Wokingham, Berkshire. RG40 1WL Tel No. 0118 974 6000 Fax No. 0118 974 6313 September 2013 HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Volume 1: Introduction & Overview Volume 2: Highway Network Maintenance Volume 3: Highway Drainage Volume 4: Winter Service Volume 5: Severe Weather and other Emergencies Volume 6: Highway Structures Volume 7: Traffic & Transport (incl Traffic Management & Road Safety) Volume 8: Street Lighting and Illuminated Signs Volume 9: Other Miscellaneous Functions Including: Sweeping and Street Cleansing Weed Control Verges and Open Spaces Trees Grass Cutting Public Rights of Way Volume 10: Highway Development Control HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN VOLUME 5 - SEVERE WEATHER AND OTHER EMERGENCIES CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. SEVERE WEATHER AND OTHER EMERGENCIES ......................................... 1 1.1 Object ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Standards ............................................................................................... 1 2. FLOODING ......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 2 2.2 Advice to the Public...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BBOWT Water Vole Recovery Project
    Berks, Bucks and Oxon Water Vole Recovery Project 2016 Report Water vole carrying food for young, Chris Hughes, River Windrush Julia Lofthouse, Mammal Project Officer Gavin Bennett, Mammal Project Assistant Contents 1 Introduction 2 Water Vole Surveys Survey Methodology Survey Participants Survey Results 3 Mink Control Background Information Mink Control Results 2015- 2016 Analysis of Mink Control Schemes 4 Alert Maps and Local Key Areas 2017 5 Water Vole Recovery Project Updates 2016 Bayswater Brook Ewelme Stream and River Thames Great Ouse and Padbury Brook Holy Brook and Sulham Brook Hurst Ditches Kennet & Avon Canal Lower River Kennet, Foudry Brook and River Thames at Sonning Lower River Windrush Mill Brook Oxford Canal River Alderbourne River Glyme and River Dorn River Ock, Sandford Brook and River Stert Upper Thames 1 Introduction The water vole Arvicola amphibius is Britain’s fastest declining mammal which has been lost from approximately 89% of its former range since 1900. In the 1950s-60s changes in river engineering practices and agricultural intensification caused the water vole population to decline. These changes resulted in habitat loss and degradation which caused fragmentation and isolation of water vole populations. Since the 1980s an introduced predator, the American mink Neovison vison has decimated water vole populations as its range has expanded throughout England, Scotland and Wales. Mink are able to counter the water voles’ anti-predatory behaviours since they swim well, hunt efficiently and female mink are small enough to enter water voles’ burrows. The Berks, Bucks and Oxon Wildlife Trust launched its Water Vole Recovery Project in 1998. The aim of the project was to arrest the decline of water voles within the three counties and to work to stabilise and increase the water vole population.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames River Basin Management Plan, Including Local Development Documents and Sustainable Community Strategies ( Local Authorities)
    River Basin Management Plan Thames River Basin District Contact us You can contact us in any of these ways: • email at [email protected] • phone on 08708 506506 • post to Environment Agency (Thames Region), Thames Regional Office, Kings Meadow House, Kings Meadow Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 8DQ The Environment Agency website holds the river basin management plans for England and Wales, and a range of other information about the environment, river basin management planning and the Water Framework Directive. www.environment-agency.gov.uk/wfd You can search maps for information related to this plan by using ‘What’s In Your Backyard’. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/maps. Published by: Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD tel: 08708 506506 email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency Some of the information used on the maps was created using information supplied by the Geological Survey and/or the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and/or the UK Hydrographic Office All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency River Basin Management Plan, Thames River Basin District 2 December 2009 Contents This plan at a glance 5 1 About this plan 6 2 About the Thames River Basin District 8 3 Water bodies and how they are classified 11 4 The state of the water environment now 14 5 Actions to improve the water environment by 2015 19 6 The state of the water
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Road Drainage and the Water Environment
    HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY 15 ROAD DRAINAGE AND THE WATER ENVIRONMENT 15.1 Introduction 15.1.1 This chapter assesses the impacts of the Scheme on road drainage and the water environment during construction and operation, focussing on the effects of highway drainage on the quality and hydrology of receiving waters. In view of the long design-life of the Scheme (30 years for new gantries, 40 years for new carriageway construction, and 120 years for new bridges), the decommissioning phase of the Scheme has not been considered in this chapter because its effects are not predicted to be worse than the effects assessed during the construction and operational phases. The chapter assesses four principal impacts: a) effects of routine runoff on surface water bodies; b) effects of routine runoff on groundwater; c) pollution impacts from spillages; and d) flood impacts. 15.1.2 Although Interim Advice Note (”IAN”) 161/13 ‘Managed Motorways, All lane running’ (Ref 15-1) has scoped out the assessment of ‘Road Drainage and the Water Environment’ for smart motorway schemes, the assessment is required to ensure the protection of the water environment, to prevent its degradation, and ensure adequate mitigation measures are in place to prevent any adverse impacts. 15.1.3 The road drainage and water environment assessment for the Scheme has been undertaken in accordance with standard industry practice and statutory guidance. 15.1.4 This chapter details the methodology followed for the assessment, and summarises the regulatory and policy framework relating to road drainage and the water environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Watch Issue 49 May 2021
    Wokingham District Veteran Tree Association Tree Watch Issue 49 May 2021 On 14th May, we had 8,445 trees in our database and 13,074 photographs Welcome to the latest issue of Tree Watch. Why have I featured these lovely carvings here? See page 7. As well as carvings, in this issue we feature native crayfish and (briefly) blue tits. As Alison mentions on page four there are many references to trees in the media these days. As there isn’t space to summarise all of these, I ’ve extended the list of recommended reading and viewing on pages 13 & 14. If you missed the Tree Council’s ‘Plant Health Week: Spring Health Check Webinar’ on 13th May, it was recorded and will hopefully be available soon. We had a very successful “Favourite Tree” evening this month and you’ll see references to some of the presentations in this and future issues; but you can also watch a recording of the whole session. The next issue of Tree Watch will be August 2021 and the copy deadline is 31st July. If you have any comments or responses to anything in this issue or contributions for future issues please send them to: Elaine Butler - datamanager @ wdvta.org.uk Main items in this issue:- (click on title) p2 AGM; WDVTA committee; Events p9 FAQ-Plastic tree guards p3 Tree Watching from my chair p9 The Native Crayfish in Berkshire p5 Remarkable Trees; Acronyms p11 Can we resurrect the English Elm? p6 Winnersh Bridge Trees p12 Species in Focus – Banyan trees p6 The Veteran Tree Survey p13 Sadly departed – MRN 4418 p7 Steve Radford does it again p13 Recommended reading and viewing p8 Trees, Hedgerows, Climate Emergency p15 Did you know? Events – June-August 2021 ❖ No WDVTA events planned until September.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Scenarios Report – Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham
    WOKINGHAM STRATEGIC GROWTH LOCATIONS Growth Scenarios Report - Grazeley, Twyford/Ruscombe and Barkham Square Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates June 2018 Wokingham Strategic Framework : Growth Scenarios Report Prepared on behalf of WBC & WBDC : By David Lock Associates & Peter Brett Associates : June 2018 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Summary of key considerations 30 Growth Scenario 1: 15,000 Homes 34 1.0 INTRODUCTION 6 Concept Plan 34 Purpose of the Strategic Framework Access & Movement 36 Commission 6 Infrastructure requirements 37 Relationship to Green Belt and agricultural Growth Scenario 2: 10,000 Homes 40 land quality 6 Concept Plan 40 Study Brief and Scope 7 Access & Movement 42 Role and Structure of this Report 8 Infrastructure requirements 42 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 10 Alternative 10,000 Home Growth Scenario 43 Growth Scenario 3: 5,000 Homes 44 Stage 1 Project Set-up and Baseline Concept Plan 46 Assessments 10 Access & Movement 46 Site Environmental Studies 10 Infrastructure requirements 46 Baseline Viability 10 Stage 2 Generating Growth Scenarios 10 5.0 BARKHAM SQUARE 48 Technical Workshops 10 Background and Analysis 48 Green and Blue 10 Site Environmental Studies: Summary Transport and Environmental Health 11 Findings 48 Community Wellbeing 11 Flooding & Drainage 48 Utilities 12 Transport & Highways 48 Community Workshops 12 Air Quality 48 Next Stages 13 Noise and Vibration 48 3.0 BASELINE VIABILITY 14 Geotechnical 49 Waste 50 Commercial Property Market 14 Agricultural Land 50 Residential
    [Show full text]
  • Kennet Catchment Management Plan Kennet Catchment Management Plan
    Kennet Catchment Management Plan Kennet Catchment Management Plan Second edition June 2019 ARK Draft Revision July 2012 Kennet Catchment Management Plan Acknowledgements All maps © Crown copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey 100024198. Aerial imagery is copyright Getmapping plc, all rights reserved. Licence number 22047. © Environment Agency copyright and/or database rights 2012. All rights reserved. All photographs © Environment Agency 2012 or Action for the River Kennet 2012. All data and information used in the production of this plan is owned by, unless otherwise stated, the Environment Agency. Note If you are providing this plan to an internal or external partner please inform the plan author to ensure you have got the latest information Author Date What has been altered? Karen Parker 21/06/2011 Reformat plus major updates Karen Parker 23/07/2011 Updates to action tables plus inclusion of investigations and prediction table. Mark Barnett 25/01/2012 Update of table 9 & section 3.1 Scott Latham 02/02/2012 Addition of Actions + removal of pre 2010 actions Scott Latham 16/02/2012 Update to layout and Design Charlotte Hitchmough 10/07/2012 ARK revised draft. Steering group comments incorporated. Issues 1, 2, 3 and 4 re-written. New action programmes and some costs inserted. Tables of measures shortened and some moved to Issue Papers. Monitoring proposals expanded. Charlotte Hitchmough 30/8/2012 Version issued to steering group for discussion at steering group meeting on 25th September 2012. ARK revisions following discussion with EA on 7th August 2012. Charlotte Hitchmough 18/12/2012 Final 2012 version incorporating all comments from partners, revised front cover and new maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Report
    Issue Date: June 2010 UNCLASSIFIED Issue No: FINAL 2 DIRECTORATE MAJOR PROJECT 8. Water Resources Hydrus Defence Exempt Environmental Appraisal Volume I Reference: MER-110-009282 8. WATER RESOURCES 1) The permanent features, which include: The Water Framework Directive (WFD) (Ref. 8-9) is a vital piece of European legislation designed to integrate how the water bodies are managed. The WFD is - Operations Building with a Lightning Protection System (LPS) implemented in England by the Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) 8.1 Introduction comprising eight lightning conductor masts in the centre of the (England and Wales) Regulations 2003 (Ref. 8-10). Other relevant legislation Hydrus Development Site; includes: This chapter of the Defence Exempt Environmental Appraisal (DEEA) addresses - Support Building in the north-east corner of the Hydrus the impact of the Proposed Development with respect to water resources. The Development Site; and • Water Act 2003 (Ref. 8-11); Proposed Development comprises a replacement hydrodynamics research facility, known as the Hydrus Facility. This will include permanent structures such - Electrical Substation in the west of the Hydrus Development Site. • Water Resources (Abstraction and Impounding) Regulations 2006 (Ref. as the Operations Building and Support Building together with an Electrical 8-12); 2) The temporary construction area established in the western part of the Substation and external works including landscaping, a Sustainable Drainage Hydrus Development Site, which includes construction accommodation System (SuDS), and access / circulation routes. • The Water Resources (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and welfare facilities, including canteen, WCs, changing facilities and and Wales) (Amendment) Regulations 2006 (Ref. 8-13); site offices in temporary buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Documents
    Site Sensitivity Map - Slice A Order Details Order Number: 201994281_1_1 Customer Ref: P18-218 National Grid Reference: 460590, 160660 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 0.28 Search Buffer (m): 1000 Site Details Land to the rear of 36 Main Road, Tadley, RG26 3NJ Tel: 0844 844 9952 Fax: 0844 844 9951 Web: www.envirocheck.co.uk A Landmark Information Group Service v50.0 26-Apr-2019 Page 1 of 5 Industrial Land Use Map Industrial Land Use Map - Slice A Order Details Order Number: 201994281_1_1 Customer Ref: P18-218 National Grid Reference: 460590, 160660 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 0.28 Search Buffer (m): 1000 Site Details Land to the rear of 36 Main Road, Tadley, RG26 3NJ Tel: 0844 844 9952 Fax: 0844 844 9951 Web: www.envirocheck.co.uk A Landmark Information Group Service v50.0 26-Apr-2019 Page 2 of 5 Flood Map - Slice A Order Details Order Number: 201994281_1_1 Customer Ref: P18-218 National Grid Reference: 460590, 160660 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 0.28 Search Buffer (m): 1000 Site Details Land to the rear of 36 Main Road, Tadley, RG26 3NJ Tel: 0844 844 9952 Fax: 0844 844 9951 Web: www.envirocheck.co.uk A Landmark Information Group Service v50.0 26-Apr-2019 Page 3 of 5 For Borehole information please refer to the Borehole .csv file which accompanied this slice. A copy of the BGS Borehole Ordering Form is available to download from the Support section of www.envirocheck.co.uk. Borehole Map - Slice A Order Details Order Number: 201994281_1_1 Customer Ref: P18-218 National Grid Reference: 460590, 160660 Slice: A Site Area (Ha): 0.28 Search Buffer (m): 1000
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Systematic List
    SyStematic LiSt Bird report for 2000–2001 observers Please see the list of contributors at the end of this report to whom we extend our thanks. abbreviations and place names The normal abbreviations are shown below in the table. For place names difficulties arise where there are several names for the same sites including where, for example, a gravel pit complex is named but not the individual pit. A map and guide to the main sites is included towards the end of the report to assist with identification. age/Sex pLaceS/ LocaLitieS ad adult com Common f/s First summer cp Country Park f/w First winter (plumage) fm Farm imm Immature gc Golf course Juv Juvenile gp Gravel Pit(s) m Male res Reservoir pr pair r. River f or fem Female Sf Sewage Farm r/h Redhead StW Sewage Treatment Works r/t Ringtail S/p Summer plumage e Berks East Berkshire S/s Second summer m.Berks Mid Berkshire S/w Second winter W Berks West Berkshire W/p Winter plumage dorney W Dorney Wetlands W Winter K&a Kennet and Avon 3/s Third summer Qmr Queen Mother Reservoir 3/w Third winter In an attempt to show the national status of our breeding birds, any species that is protected under Schedule One of the Wildlife and Countryside Act and any species that may be red or amber listed in the most recent list of Birds of conservation concern for the UK will have the species status placed in brackets after the county status which precedes the species account.
    [Show full text]