<<

This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 69-4926

LARKIN, Gary Freeman, 1941- SEROLOGIC SPECIFICITY OF ANTIBODIES TO RIBONUCLEIC ACID IN NORMAL AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS SERA.

The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1968 Health Sciences, immunology

University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan SEROLOGIC SPECIFICITY OF ANTIBODIES TO RIBONUCLEIC ACID IN NORMAL AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS SERA

DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University

By Gary Freeman Larkin, B»S<,, MoS„

The Ohio State University 1968

Approved by

Adviser Microbiology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The writer wishes to express his sincere appreciation and thanks to Dr. Matthew C. Dodd whose sound advice and encouragement were invaluable during the course of graduate studies at this Uni­ v e rsity . The writer is also deeply grateful to Dr. Nancy J. Bigley for her enthusiasm, interest, and most valuable criticism during the present investigation. Appreciation is also extended to James C, Darnel’ for his sug­ gestions and interest in this study. VITA

July 16, 19;+1 Bom — Massillon, Ohio

1963• B.S., The Ohio State U niversity, Columbus, Ohio 196^ 1966.... Teaching A ssistant, Department, of Microbiology, The Ohio State U niversity, Columbus, Ohio

1966...c.e.o. M.S., The Ohio State U niversity, Columbus, Ohio 1966-196?.... Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Micro­ , The Ohio State U niversity, Columbus, Ohio 1967-1968.... Graduate Research Associate, Department of Micro­ biology, The Ohio State U niversity, Columbus, Ohio

FIELDS OF STUDY

Major Field: Microbiology Studies in Immunology. Professor Matthew C, Dodd, Profes­ sor Nancy J. Bigley, Professor Frank V/, Chorpenning Studies in Pathogenic Microbiology. Professor Melvin S. Rheins Studies in Bacterial Physiology. Professor Chester I. Randles , Studies in Food Microbiology. Professor Harry H. Weiser

Studies in Virology. Professor David A. Wolff

i i i CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION...... ___ ...... 1

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE...... 3

MATERIALS AND METHODS...... « . « . . . 2 3

RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTATION...... 37

DISCUdSION...... 6oe..o.ffoe..o.....0oe*effeooee.ee«eoo..o. 72

SUMMARY . . . .o. o. . .9 0 . oe...... «.o.o. . 87

LITERATURE CITED...... o o o ......

xv TABLES

Table Page 1. Percentage of complement fix atio n in h ibition of anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by- and bases...... 39 2. Percentage of complement fix atio n in h ib itio n of anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by purine and pyrimidine ...... 39 3. Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by purine and pyrimidine »...... 40 4. Percentage of complement fix atio n in h ibition of anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by -containing compounds...... • . . . •». 41 5. Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of • anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by -containing compounds...... 41 6. Percentage of complement fix atio n in h ib itio n of anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by -containing compounds...... 42 7. Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by -containing compounds...... 43 8. Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of anti-RNA a c tiv ity in normal human serum by -containing compounds ...... 43 9. Results of whole serum electrophoresis of rheumatoid arthritis sera and normal sera...... 46 10. Conglutination reactivity of rheumatoid arthritis sera and normal sera ...... 48

v Table Page

11. Passive hemagglutination reactivity of rheumatoid arthritis sera with nucleic acids and their derivatives...... p . 31 15. Results of passive hemagglutination absorptions with various antigens upon rheumatoid az tin x tis seia...... oooo...... 5^*

13. Results of passive hemagglutination absorptions with base pairs upon rheumatoid a r th r itis s e ia ...... 63

v i INTRODUCTION

Complement fixation techniques as well as precipitation reactions have demonstrated that antibodies exist in serum with specificities directed toward cellular as well as subcellular portions of tissues and organs. Furthermore, different specificities can be shown in comparisons between normal and malignant cells and subcellular components. With the discovery of, and subsequent investigations into, the area of antigenicity, work in this laboratory and others has been carried out in order to determine the exact im­ munological. specificity of these-antigenic substances. The work of Friou, Finch and Detre (30) and the subsequent identification of the lupus erythematosis factor as a gamma globulin with deoxyribonucleo- protein specificity was a major achievement in the increased body of knowledge regarding the immunologically associated autoimmune disease processes. Previous work in this laboratory has shown that ribonucleic acid (RNA) linked to bentonite particles can detect antibodies to RNA in sera of both diseased and normal individuals. Furthermore, there are differences in the specificity of the antibody response, to this antigen. It is the purpose of 'Hie present study to further elucidate these differences and to study in greater depth the iimn.unocheiin.cal relationship between the antigen and its specific antibody.

1 By utilizing the quantitative micro-comploment fixation and micro-complement fixation inhibition techniques of Wasserman and Levin© (92), normal serum anti-RNA antibody sp e c ific ity was studied. Since rheumatoid arthritis sera were anti-complementary, attempts were made to identify these factors. Passive hemagglutination titrations and absorptions were performed upon rheumatoid arthritis sera using nucleic acids, , and bases as anti­ gens. absorptions were also carried out. Direct comparisons between the bentonite flocculation technique, the passive hemagglu­ tin a tio n technique and the complement fix atio n technique were made. By using various nucleotides, nucleosides, and purine and pyrimidine bases, the immunologic specificity of such antibodies was also com­ pared. The nature of the antigenic determinant was investigated. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Previous reports have indicated a wide range of immunolog- . ically active substances present in tissue and organ extracts. Duran-Reynals (27) reported that sera from chickens and other fowls flocculated crude salin e extracts of huiuan tissu e s. Using complement fixation, Kidd and Friedewald (45) demonstrated the reactivity of normal rabbit serum with saline extracts of rabbit kidney,.liver, lung, brain, spleen, and heart tissue. Further investigations have shorn th a t animals immunised with wholo brain tissu e react with alco- . holic extracts of brain (.96), both of homologous and heterologous origin. Thyroid tissue appears to contain both organ and species specific factors. Isoantibodies may be produced in the rabbit causing changes in the organ of the immunised animal (69, 97). Sim ilarly, many patients with chronic thyroiditis possess antibody reactivity toward the microsomal fraction of the extracted gland (84). Furthermore, lens (37), uveal (22), and pancreatic tissue (98) can serve as auto­ antigens as well as iso- and hotero-genetic antigens. Gajdusek (34) used complement fixing antibody techniques to demonstrate autoanti­ bodies to human tissue antigens in the sera of patients known to have acute or chronic diseases as well as for the detection of autoantibody to normal human tissue (33)» In addition to normal tissue and organ antigens, there are many specific antigens which are produced as the

3 kr result of experimentally induced tumors (55) and naturally occurring tumors (85t 99) • Wiederman (95) has shown that antibodies with specifieity directed toward the cytoplasmic constituents of the liver, namely the mitochondria, lysosomos, microsomos and the soluble fractio n appear in sera of patients with lupus erythematosis and infectious hepatitis. Asherson (1) demonstrated furthermore complement fixation reactions with the cytoplasmic fraction of cells as well as with nuclear compo­ nents in the sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosis, lupoid hepatitis, syphilis, and macroglobulinemia. Deicher, eh al. (2h) demonstrated that sera of patients with SLE and other diseases when mixed with subeellular fractions (human liv e r, kidney or calf liv e r, and r a t liv e r microsomes and mitochondria) bound complement. Treatment of these preparations with DNase, RNase, or trypsin did not change the titer of the complement fixation reac­ tions indicating that nucleic acids were probably not the cause of antibody production. As a logical consequence of these studies, Macks.y and Gajdusek (52) stated that cell proteins, particulate compo­ nents, polysaccharides, and nucleoproteins could become antigenic and act as autoantigens if they were released from the cell and came into contact with cells of the retieulo-endothelial system. When, in 19h8, Hargraves, Richmond and Morton (hO) discovered the LE serum factor which is responsible for LE cell formation and when Haserick, et al. (hi) determined it to be a gamma globulin, interest was turned toward discovering the specificity of the LE fac­ tor in serum. Friou, Finch, and Detre (30) showed that this serum facto r combined with iso lated n u c le i, and Friou (31) proved th a t the antibody would react with deoxyribonucleoprotein of both natural and synthetic origins. Further investigation of lupus erythematosis serum has re­ sulted in a great Increase of information regarding the antigenic properties of nucleoproteins (?1, 72, 90). Antibodies in the serum of a p a tien t with lupus erythematosis fixed complement and precipi­ tated the DNA from normal human leukocytes, lymphatic leukemia cells, and myeloid leukemia cells (20). Absorption of this sera with RNA had no effect upon reactivity. Seligmn (?8) reported the presence of DNA antibody in some LE sera which were detected by liquid or gel precipi­ tation, passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, or by complement fixation. Five per cent of rheumatoid arthritis sera were also positive for anti- DNA (79)o Robbins,- e t a l . (61) showed positive complement fixation with cell nuclei and D.upus erythematosis sera, and Holman (^3) has shown an affinity between the LE factor and cell nucloi and nucleo- protein, concluding that the LE factor could act as an autoantibody.

Barnett (7) has similarly reported the presence of an antinuelear fac­ tor in rheumatoid arthritis. Musehel, et al. (5*0 have demonstrated that the anti-DNA reactivity in lupus erythematosis is not species specific and postulated either a bacterial or viral nucleoprotein as the antigenic stimulus. The exact role of antibodies in autoimmune diseases is highly disputed. Seligman (80) reported that studies of LE sera before thor- apy was initiated showed an average in excess of eighty per cent positive for antinuelear antibodies. After therapy was completed, 6 the number of positive sera correlated well with the degree of re­ covery. In cases of complete clinical recovery, the incidence of positive reactivity is well below the ten per cent level. Levi and Poverenny (50), using passive hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition reactions characterized the specific anti­ bodies of SLE patients against both denatured and native DNA. They hypothesized that antibodies are formed first at the outset of the disease and are directed toward denatured DNA. Later, antibodies are formed against native DNA, depending upon the severity of the autoim­ mune process. These authors believe that the presence of DNA and DNA antibodies alternated in the serum.

Tan, Sehur, Carr and Kunlcel (89) studied the possible mecha­ nisms of renal 3.esion production in systemic lupus erythematosis. Using gel diffusion, they demonstrated not only DNA antibodies, but also native DNA free in the serum. In addition, it was shown using serial serum samples that there was an inverse correlation between the presence of native DNA in the serum and the presence of DNA antibodies. If sera with free DNA were reacted with sera containing anti-DM, complement fix atio n and p re c ip itin reactions were po sitiv e. This sug­ gests a possible mechanism of in vivo antigen-antibody complexes form­ ing and causing tissu e damage. Antibodies with specificities directed towards ribosomes and their subunits have also been discovered in LE sera. Sturgill and Carpenter (87) and Sturgill and Preble (88) reported that fifty-one per cent of forty-one patients with SLE had antibodies to ribosomes by using an indirect immunofluorescence spot test. Precipitation in agar 7 would occur if the titer was greater than56 2 as indicated by the spot test. The antigen was sensitive to both RNase and trypsin and mi­ grated toward the cathode in an electric field, Schur, Moroz, and Kunkel (74) described antibodies to a ribo- sornl antigen in 11 of 85 SLE patients by direct precipitation and in 35 of the 85 patients studied by using the fluorescent spot test. Those patients having precipitating antiribosomal antibodies all had renal implications. Of the remaining 74 SLE patients not demonstrat­ ing the precipitation reaction, renal complications were present in only half. These authors postulated that ribosomes may gain access to the circulation where they combine with circulating antibodies and be­ come deposited in the glomeruli of the kidneys. Treatment of the ribo­ somes with trypsin or RNase destroyed the antigenic reactivity, im­ plying that the antibody response is directed toward the intact ribo- somal p a rtic le with i t s complex nucleic acid and protein in teractio n s. Barnett, Bienenstock, and Block (11) have demonstrated anti- nuclear factors of immunoglobulin origin in the synovia of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Sera contained anti-nuclear factor reac­ tivity in most instances, but in some patients, only the synovia demonstrated re a c tiv ity . Hemolytic complement levels as w ell as the reactivity of C'2 were greatly reduced. It was proposed that the reaction of the antinuelear factors in the synovia with nuclear anti­ gens may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Recently, Friou (32) has discussed the diagnostic significance of anti-DNA and anti-deoxyribonucleoprotein antibodies in systemic disorders. Anti-DNA when present in significantly high titers is of 8 great significance for clinical diagnosis whereas anti-deoxyribo- nucleoprotein is never completely diagnostic alone. If both anti­ bodies are present at high titers, indications of a systemic involve­ ment are most strongly favored. Beck, et al, (12) described anti-nuclear precipitating auto­ antibodies to a wide variety of organs and tissues in Sjorgren's Syn­ drome which is characterized, by keratoconjunctivitis sicca, salivary gland involvement, and rheumatoid arthritis. In addition to tho antinuelear and tissue antibodies, the rheumatoid factor is present as well as thyroglobin autoantibodies. The abovo mentioned investigations have shown the relationship between the presence of an autoimmune phenomenon and the resulting autoantibodies to subcellular organelles including ribosomes and nuclei. Although Lacom’, Harel and Harel (^7) have successfully pro­ duced antisera to mammalian ribosomes, recent work by Dodd, Bigley and co-workers ( 25, 26) have shown the development of an autoimmune proc­ ess in experimental animals. The antiserum from these animals immu­ nized >rith rat liver ribosomes contained antibodies to ribosomes, yeast soluble RNA, and ribosomal protein. Ribonucleic acid in adju­ vant produced practically all the same abnormal aspects of the ribo­ some immunized animals. In another study, Bigley’, ..jot al, (15) havo shown th a t rabbits injected with r a t or homologous liv e r ribosomes in Freund’s adjuvant developed hemolytic anemia, leukopenia and multi- organ pathology. Normal rabbits also demonstrated the same autoim­ mune syndrome when passively immunized with anti-ribosorcal sera from an immunized rab b it. Furthermore, i t was shown th a t nuclei, soluble 9 RNA, and. ribosomal protein in Freund’s adjuvant would cause production of specific antibodies with definite and speci­ ficity as determined by passive hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition tests. Anti-ribosome antibodies were completely inhibited by 500 micrograms of , , and , and partially inhibited by . Antibody activity directed toward soluble ENA was inhibited by a ll four nucleotides and nucleosides present in ENA. The anti-nuclear antibodies were partially inhibited by guanosine mono­ and guanosine and completely inhibited by thymine monophos­ phate, cytosine monophosphate, adenosine and cytidine. Because of the autoimmune nature of the experimentally induced disease, other workers have investigated sera of patients with rheuma­ toid arthritis for the presence of anti-nucleic acid antibodies. Rheumatoid a r th r itis is a disease suspected of an autoimmune origin. There is evidence that the immune response relates to the cause of the disease (21). • There are definite clinical and patholog­ ical analogies between serum sickness and the connective tissue syn­ dromes, which include rheumatoid arthritis, since the host responds to foreign serum proteins in a way similar to the response in rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatic fever and systemic lupus erythematosis. Using serologic techniques, studies have shown th a t autoimmune processes are active in rheumatoid, arthritis since antinuelear factors, positive LE cell formation and the presence of the rheumatoid factor are all found in a majority of cases.

The sedimentation constant of tho rheumatoid factor is 19S, but the f a c to r. is combined with the low molecular weight gamma 10 globulin in sera which contains very large amounts of the globulin„ forming a 22S complex. In addition to the 19S factor, there is also recent evidence for a7S rheumatoid factor which reacts with other 7S gamma globulins. Prolonged immunization of experimental animals with killed Escherichia coll, Bacillus subtllls, and Salmonella typhimurium causes production of substances which mimic rheumatoid factors. The sero­ lo g ical sp e c ific ity is detectable in the form of an immune complex or in an aggregated form. It appears that prolonged immunization forms an in vivo immune complex, and the eventual breakdown of these com­ plexes is the stimulation necessary for the production of autoanti­ bodies. This experimental work indicates that perhaps there is a con­ stant antigenic stimulation which is responsible for the disease syn­ drome . There are two other pieces of clinical information which can be cited as possible iiumunologically oriented implications of rheumatoid arthritis. First, a common feature of rheumatoid arthritis is a hypergammaglobulinemia and secondly, the synovial membranes and joint structures which are affected contain plasmacytes and nodular arrange­ ments of lymphocytes which resemble the primary structural feature of lymphoid tissues, or the lymphoid follicle. It has been found by Hollander (4-2) that cytoplasmic inclusions of gamma globulins exist in the polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the synovial fluid. A possibility exists that these gamma globulins are being actively phagocytized by the polymorphonuclear leukocytes causing the release of leukocytic 11 lysosomal which may, in turn, cause further destruction of the synovial tissues (2). S im ilarly, complement lev els have been studied in the sera of patients having diseases of suspected immunological origin23). ( Dermatomyositis, anaphylactoid purpura, scleroderma, polyarteritis nodosa and rheumatoid arthritis are associated with normal or elevated complement t i t e r s while SLE with renal involvement shows a decreased complement le v e l. However, Cooper and Fogel (23) point out th a t not a l l immune complexes fix complement and th a t normal or elevated com­ plement levels do not completely rule out the possibility of an auto­ immune etiology for the disease procoss. In a similar manner, de­ creased complement levels are not always indicative of in vivo com­ plement fixation by immune complexes and a relationship to immuno­ logical processes. Recently, Bienenstock and Block (14) studied the levels of iimiunoconglutinin in the sera of patients with rheumatic and autoim­ mune diseases. Imimraoconglutrurin tit e r s of 16 or greater were found in 51 per cent of patients with rheumatic diseases and 71 in per cent of patients with SLE, myasthenia gravis, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and Sjorgren's syndrome. Since immunoeonglutinin can combine with the bound Cf3 component of complement and prevent fu rth er fix atio n of complement components, these authors postulate th a t immune con glut in -jn could lim it the circu latio n of p o ten tially harmful activated comple­ ment components. However, another im plication arises since immuno- conglutinin is a gamma M antibody and could bind complement by i ts e l f . They postulate that this combination could provide more C!4,2a sites 1 2 causing the activation of more C*3 molecules, and the further activa­ tio n of complement would occur. This could cause fu rth er damage in an autoimmune sta te . Scheetz (81) utilized the bentonite flocculation technique of Bozieevich (16) to investigate the occurrence and immunologic specific­ ity of antibodies to DNA. He demonstrated that purine bases did not inhibit DNA-bentonite flocculating reactivities in lupus erythema­ tosis or normal sera, but did havo the capacity for inhibiting DNA reactivities present in rheumatoid arthritis sera. The pyrimidine bases inhibited only a small percentage of antibodies in all three serum types while the deoxy-counterparts, the deojypurines and deoxy- , were shown to inhibit the DNA flocculation in rheumatoid sera in a significantly higher percentage than in the sera of normal individuals. Similar work (48) was carried out using the bentonite floc­ culation method with RNA as the antigen. A heat stable factor cap­ able of flocculating RNA-bentonite was found in the sera of some in­ dividuals with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosis, and miscellaneous collagen diseases. A heat Labile factor was noted in the sera of all normal individuals which was absent in the collagen disease sera. The disease sera were shown to havo unique serologic specificities by nucleotide, nucleoside and base inhibition studies while normal unheated sera displayed a much broader range of speci­ f ic ity . Feldbush (29) extended the above mentioned work by investi­ gating the immunochemical relatio nship between c a rrie rs, red blood 13 cells in the passive hemagglutination reaction, and bentonite in the bentonite flocculation technique. There were two different antibodies detected by the hemagglutination reaction. One was characterized as heat labile, predominately 19S and B ^, which, was inhibited by DNA, The othex- was determined to be heat stable, 7S and 19S globulins which were inhibited completely only by RNA or its nucleotides, Thi.s work correlates well with the investigations carried out by Barnett and co-workers (6, 8, 9) in which all three major classes of immunoglobu­ lins were found to contain anti-nuclear reactivity in rheumatoid arth­ ritis sera and lupus erythematosis sera. Feldbush also showed the occurrence of a reversible antigen--antibody complex when either RNA or the low molecular weight hapten inhibitors were used, as antigens. It is interesting to note that a difference exists in the de­ tection of antibodies to PINA in normal individuals using passive hemag­ glutination (29) and bentonite flocculation (AS), Only 29 per cent of normals were weakly positive by passive hemagglutination reactions while 100 per cent were positive by the bentonite flocculation test.

Recently, Poverenny and co-workers (66,67 ), using the passive hemag­ glutination reaction found 60 per cent of all normals to react with DNA. Three groups of antibodies were demonstrated. The first wore those reacting with formalin denatured DNA. The next group demon­ strated activity with heat denatured DNA, and the last was a group with a broad range of serological activity including heat denatured, formalin treated, and native DNA. It is this last type of antibody which can inhibit the activity of DNA as a primer for RNA polymerase reactivity and can therefore influence DNA translating ability. 14

Rosenkrantz, et al. (70) have demonstrated that antisera directed against purine and pyrimidine containing albumin complexes can pens- trate and become fixed in the cells of fertilized, eggs of Arbacia punctulata. The arrestment of development was dependent upon the dilution of antibody and its specificity. The interaction of antibody is postulated to be with the single-stranded DNA in the cell. P anijol (57) has recently shown th a t there are anti-RNA a n ti­ bodies in the sera of germ-free animals. These antibodies will precip­ itate only synthetic poly I and poly U. Furthermore, the precipitin reaction is specifically inhibited by various and with either pod.y A or poly C. There is no cross-inhibition with DNA from any source. The authors propose that these antibodies are a result of either auto immunization or are a part of a normal clearing mechanism involving genetically controlled, normally synthesized globulins. Thivolet4 Monier, Ruel and Richard (91) discovered anti­ nuelear antibodies of autoimmune nature in Swiss mice who were thymec- tomiaed at birth. These antibodies appeared at 11 and 15 weeks after thymectomy. Since the thymectomy should suppross a l l immunological responses, a role of normally synthesized antibody as an active physiological clearing mechanism must be considered. Antinuelear antibodies wore also found in normal human sub­

je c ts (19) by using complement fix atio n and inmmofluorescent tech­ niques. Ninety-seven per cent of all normal blood donors showed positiv e complement fix atio n with antigens of calf thymus origin. Antibodies with a weak reactivity for calf thymus nuclei were also 15 demonstrable with normal human serum by indirect immunofluorescence using monospecific anti-gamma G, gamma A, and gamma M. In a similar manner, normal rabbit sera has also been shown to contain demonstrable anti-nuclear reactivity (10). Since it was known that subcellular organelles were antigenic, investigative efforts wore turned toward nucleic acids and their pos­ sible role as antigens. An early report (9^0 stated that nucleic acids possessed no antigenic activity. Phillips, ot al. (60) demon­ strated precipitating antibody in the sera of rabbits immunised, with a DNA rich preparation of Brucella abortus. The substance had a strong

Fuelgen reaction which showed decreasing absorption Z60 at and 277 millimicrons when treated, with DNase. Further work by Plescia and co-workers (61) showed that the reactive complex was sensitive 'bo per­ iodate treatment also, implicating the presence of other antigenic determinants in addition to the nucleic acid moiety. The sensitivity of antigenic preparations to DNase in other studios (b8) has further demonstrated the antigenicity of DNA complexes. Levine (51) found a cross-reactivity with from tho T-even coliphages T2 to T6, but not to Escherichia coll or calf thymus DNA, indicating that some specificity may lie in the 5-hydroxymethyl cyto­ sine common to these phages. Murakami and co-workers (52) have extended this work with their experimental approach in which thermally dena­ tured phage DNA was used to uncover the antigenic determinants of the molecule. Antibodies were directed in part to the glueosylated 5-hydroxymsthyl cytosine of the phage DNA. Townsend, et al. (92) showed hapten inhibitions of DNA reactivity present in the sera of 16 rabbits immunized with bacteriophage DNA with diglycosyl-dHMP, cello- biose, gentiobiose, amygdaleno, alpha glycosyl-dHMP and maltose. Several approaches have been used by Beiser and Erlanger (13) for the production of DNA specific antibodies. Hypsrimniunization with Gram negative bacteria, immunization with or pyrimidines coupled to proteins or polypeptides, or immunization with denatured DNA or electrostatically coupled to methylated bovino serum albumin all caused production of nucleic acid specific anti­ bodies. Further work by these authors (18) has shown that bovine serum albumin conjugates containing the 6~purinoyl and 6-purinoyl-B-alanyl moieties caused production of antibodies which gave equivocal results when examined for purine or pyrimidine specificity. The effectiveness of various compounds as hapten inhibitors was investigated. It was found that those inhibitors which possessed an intact ring structure were far more effective as inhibitors than those compounds containing a ring structure which was open. Erlanger and Beiser (28) further investigated antibodies specific for ribonucleosides and ribonucleotides. They demonstrated th a t an ti-cy tid in e, anti-guanine, anti-AMP and anti-UMP react with thermally denatured DNA but not with native DNA. It was noted that AMP was a better inhibitor than either adenosine or adenine. Also, cytidine appeared to be better than either cytosine or cytidylic acid. It was concluded that the antibodies were specific for the entire mole­ cule, not just the purine or pyrimidine bases and that serologic differences do reside in the -phosphate backbone of the , also. 17 Butler, Tanenbaum, Stewart, and Beiser (17) have demonstrated that purin~6~oyl protein conjugates form antibody with purine speci­ f ic ity which faeces complement in the presence of denatured DNA, Only purines and purine derivatives specifically inhibited the reaction. The 50 por cent endpoint in the complement fix atio n technique was never reached with the pure base only. Base derivatives were able to inhibit at the desired endpoint, however, Sela, et al. (83) have shown that antibodies with specificity toward uridine may bs obtained in rabbits by injection of synthetic molecules in which uridine--carboxylic acid is bound through an amide bond to the amino term inal groups of poly-DL-a.lan.yl side chains of a multichain synthetic polypeptide. The antigenic specificity of this compound is due to the nucleoside unit as a whole since uracil and alone did not inhibit the reaction while uridine and uridylic acid did. also caused inhibition which indicates that neither the methyl group at position 5 nor the hydroxyl group at position 2 of the riboso moiety is important in determining the combining site. There was no inhibition by purine nucleosides, implicating the im­ portant role of the pyrimidine ring in specificity. Further work by

Sela (82) has shown th a t the uridine-poly A complex possessed anti-DNA re a c tiv ity . Calf thymus DNA did not p recip itate the antbody, while heat denatured DNA did. There was an enhancement of precipitation when the DNA was heat denatured in the presence of formalin. Recently, Seaman, et al. (75) coupled methylated bovine serum albumin and T4 phage DNA. All of the antisera contained antibodies directed toward the alpha-glucosylated hydroxymethyl cytidilic acid of 18 the phage DNA. All the antibodies showed specificity toward T-oven phage DNA except in cases in which the phage underwent photooxi­ dation. These antibodies reacted with heterologous DNAs lacking the glucosylated. moiety. It was also noted that the removal of phos­ phate from the cytidilic acid decreased its effectiveness as a hapten in h ib ito r. Halloran and Parker (38) prepared micleotide-protein conju­ gates using various carbodiimides as the coupling agents. Mononuc­ leotides j, , and DNA were coupled directly to both bovine gamma globulin and human serum albumin through the formation of a nitrogen-phosphate bond with protein epsilon amino groups or by the formation of a phospliodiester bond with protein seryl and threonyl residues. Experimental evidence indicates the formation of N-P bonds as the principle means of linlcaga. These methods of conjugation occur without any chemical pretreatment which might destroy the antigenicity of the nucleotide portion of the conjugate. Furthermore, these authors (39) have reported that the antibody response to a tetra- nucleotide of thymidylate may not be to the entire tetranucleotide. There also were no obvious differences in antibody responses to two different types of DNA, differing greatly in their base contents and ratios. This appears to be in direct apposition to the work of Stollar, Levine, Lehrer and Vasa Vvmakis (86) in which they postulate a tetra- or penta-nucleotide sequence as making up the antigenic determinant which determines the combining site of the antibody.

Similarly, Plescia and Braun 65 ( ) described nucleic acid specific antibodies produced in response to oligomers of thymidylate ranging 19 from two to six residues in length or even by a made up of three residues.

Pleseia (61, 6^) has shown that soluble or transfer KM can function as a hapten when conjugated to methylated bovine serum al­ bumin. Similarly, synthetic co-polymers of deoxyadcnylate-thymidylate when complexed with methylated "bovine serum albumin were haptenic in rabbits. These antibodies cross-reacted with heat-denatured calf thymus DM, and they inhibited the transform ation reaction of B acillus subtills DIM. Furthermore, ribonucleotide homopolymers (63) have been conjugated to methylated bovine serum albumin. Antibodies were pro­ duced with specificity for tho ribonucleotides which made up the poly­ mers whereas antibodies made in response to the soluble RNA conjugates showed a wider range of reactivity to all the common nucleotides. Using methylated bovino serum albumin ribopolymer complexes as immunogens, Seaman, Van Vunakis, and Levine76) (produced antibodies directed toward polyadenylie, polyinosinic, and polyeytidilic acids. Polyinosinic acid cross-reacted with antibody to polyadenylie acid by gel diffusion and complement fix atio n , whereas tho reciprocal cross reaction between polyadenylie acid and anti-polyinosinie antibody was not observed. Only the polyinosinic acid—anti-polyinosinic acid system was inhibited to any significant extent by mononucleosides. This implies that the antigenic determinants are larger than mono­ nucleosides. Recently, Karol and Tanonbaum(1 1 ) studied some immunogens which cause stimulation of antibodies cross-reacting with RNA. These included 2,^~quina2olinedione-6-aao-albumin, , and 20 dihydrouridine conjugates of albumin. A uridine specific antiserum and the globulin from a dihydrouridine antiserua can be shown to react with ENA by complement f 3ratio n . A ll of the above conjugates cross- rea ct in gel with c alf thymus DKA. Barbu and Dandeu (5) and Barbu and Panijel (3» *0 have de­ scribed the presence of antibodies reacting with both ribosomal pro­ tein constituents and with the ribonucleic acid from bacterial ribo­ somes. Panijel, Barbu, and Quash (56) found a normal factor in the sera of humans and non-immunized rabb its which reacted with. ENA. That tolerance was not observed to ribosomal ENA is shown by the observation that non-immunised adult rabbits exhibited a delayed type hypersensi­ tivity towards small doses of ribosomes of diverse origin including autologous ribosomes. New-born rabbits inoc.iil.ated during the first seven days after birth with bacterial ribosomes as adults exhibited the cutaneous delayed hypersensitivity reaction only after larger dosages of ribosomes than were required by the non-iimaunizod group. These investigators maintain that tolerance cannot be established to RNA, but it can be provoked to the protein moiety of the ribosomes. P an ijel, Cayeux, Sacquet, and Charlier (57) in discussing anti-RNA facto rs in germ-free animals place the re a c tiv ity in the classes of NGI and NGII antibodies. NG refers to anti-irucleic acid antibodies. Tho NGII globulins are the result of autoirmiunisation and reflect an intrinsic quality of normally synth.esi.zed globulins. The NGI globulins are produced in response to immunization by ribosomes and are thought to bolong to the 73 globulin class. This globulin typ9 has been investigated by Sandor and co-workors (73) in horse 21 serum. It has been described to be a 7S gamma globulin which is im- munologically identical to a 19S gamma-1(beta 2)--M~globulin. This factor is present at levels lower than 0.1 per cent in normal horso serum but makes up 1-2 per cent of the globulins in horses immunized with ribosomes. The extent of organization of polyribonucleotides and their involvement in the immunochemical behavior in reacting with NGI a n ti­ bodies have been studied in great detail by Panijel, Souliel, and Cayeux (58). In studying homopolymers of one or several chains of poly I, poly U, poly C, and poly A, these investigators v.sed the pre­ cipitation of NGI antibodies of horses immunized with ribosomes of bacterial origin to determine the optimal conditions for such precipi­ tation reactions. When the anti-RNA antibodies are prepared in non- eleetrolyte solutions, all four polyribonucleotides precipitated in an identical fashion, showing that the bases do not determine the pre­ cipitation reaction either quantitatively or qualitatively. When the ionic strength is increased, the polyribonucleotides undergo a reor­ ganization which changes their ii>jmunochemical behavior. This reorgan­ ization results in an unmasking of antigenic sitos. For instance, it was determined with poly U that at increased, ionic concentration, there was a molecular conformation in which the molecule folded over upon it­ self. As the ionic strength was increased, the intermolecular confor­ mation became more and more folded with a subsequent unmasking of antigenic sites, causing the precipitation of more globulins. Further studies with poly A and poly C implicate an intramolecular reorgani­ zation with tho same unmasking of antigenic sites. In the case of 22 poly I, increasing ionic concentration showed a variable number of fragments which increased the order of organization and allowed a max­ imum amount of antibody to be p recip itated . To summarize th is work, the quantity of antibodies which a certain amount of polyribonucleo­ tides can precipitate is a function of the number of antigenic sites accessible to the antibodies along the chain. The number of antigenic sites available is directly related to the physical configuration of the molecule with larger amounts of antibody being precipitated as a result of the unmasking of antigenic sites. The authors expanded th e ir work to complexes of homopolymers such as complexes of poly A and poly U (59). It was determined that the formation of complexes causes a masking of antigenic sites and reduces the amount of antibody which is precip itated . However, when an additional strand of poly U is added, there is no increase in the masking of antigenic sites. It was hypothesized that tho additional strand of poly U is inserted between tho helical structure formed by the complex of poly.-A and poly U. This work show's th a t the estab lish ­ ment of a helically organized structure determines the degree of masking of the antigenic sites which are located along the polyribose- phosphate backbone. This organisation produces a steric hindrance which reduces the amount of anti-RNA antibodies which can bo precipi­ tated . Further work regarding the characteristics of anti-ribosome antibodies is reviewed by Plescia and Braun65 ). ( Using polyinosinic acid as a test substance, it was found that human sera from individ­ uals with pathological conditions and other mammalian sera contained 23 factors which precipitated poly I. They were present at very low le v e ls, while the sera of ribosome immunized animals contained sig­ nificantly higher levels. Furthermore, the natural occurrence of basic proteins leads to the reaction of anti-ribosomal serum with DNA, polycytidilate, heparin and dextran sulfate in addition to RNA. Pre­ cipitation was carried out at 0.14 M NaCl and 0.3 M NaCl with only RNA being precipitated at both concentrations. It was found that there were two fractions of anti-ribosome serum. One of these fractions was the more basic and was precipitated preferentially by RNA and the polyribonucleotides. Pleseia and Braun (65) further describe the problems associated with the studies of anti-nucleic acid antibodies. The prime difficulty lies with the heterogeneity of antibodies because of nucleotide se­ quences which vary in length and chemical make-up. In addition, structural alterations in the nucleic acid antigenic complex may well influence immunologic reactivity. Furthermore, it has not been defi­ nitely established that the nucleotides must be in a direct sequence or that reactive nucleotides must be on tho same chain structure. Lastly, antibodies directed toward nucleic acids are also thought to have soma specificity toward the sugar-phosphate backbone in which case nucleotide sequences and base composition would play a reduced role in immunological considerations. The purpose of this dissertation is to further elucidate the antibody specificity of antibodies to RNA in both normal sera and in the sera of individuals with clinically diagnosed rheumatoid arth­ r i t i s and to compare these sp e c ific itie s . Comparisons w ill be made with reference to tho three techniques employed: (1) bentonite floe culation, (2) q uantitative complement fix atio n , and (3) passive hemagglutination. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rheumatoid A rthritis Sera

All rheumatoid arthritis sera used in this investigation were obtained through tho courtesy of Dr. Vol K. Phillips of the Columbus Medical Center. Twenty-five pooled sera from serial bleedings of individual patients wore used, for all serological studies in this in­ vestigation o Normal sera were obtained from donors in tho Department.

Buffers and Solutions

Phosphate Buffer — Phosphate buffer (Na^HPO^ — KHgPO^ sys­ tem) , 0.15 M, pH 7.3 was used for a ll hemagglutination and hemaggluti­ nation absorption reactions. Modifi ed Barbital Buffer — Modified barbital buffer was pre­ pared and used fo r a l l complement fix atio n reactio ns. To prepare th is buffer, 2.8750 grams of 5»5~diethylharbituric acid wore dissolved in 250 ml of distilled water near tho boiling point. The remaining in­ gredients wore then added: 1.8750 grams sodium 5»5~diethylbarbiturats, *1-2.500 grams sodium chloride, 0.1103 grams CaCl °2H„0, and 0.5083 grams MgCl^' 6lig0. The solution was cooled and diluted to 1000 ml with distilled water. To use the buffer, one part of the stock solution prepared above was diluted with four parts of distilled water. The final pH of the buffer was adjusted, to 7.3.

25 26

Barbital Buffer for Electrophoresis — Tho high resolution barbital buffer for electrophoresis was made as follows: 6,0 grams Tris (hydr oxyme thylaniinoethane) , 2*5 grams 5»5~diothylba.rbitu.rie acid, and 10.4 grams sodium 5 ,5-diethylbarbiturate were dissolved in 2 liters of distilled water. Tho pH was adjusted to 8.6 with sodium hydroxide. Tho buffer was stored at refrigerator temperature and was used cold during electrophoresis, Tris—NaCl Buffer for Sephadex Gel Filtration — One-tenth M Tris HC1, pH 8.0 in 1 M NaCl was used for the swelling of Sephadox Gels and for the actual separation of serum components in the gel f i l ­ tration techniques. A 1:10,000 dilution of merthiolata was used to prevent contamination of the gels and serum. Aquaclde Solution —* A 5 per cent solution of Aquaeide (Calbiochem) was used in order to concentrate globulins obtained from gel filtration and precipitation procedures. The material was dis­ solved either in distilled water or phosphate buffer, pH 7.3, de­ pending upon the serological technique which was to be employed. Normal Rabbit Serum —- Phosphate Buffer — Rabbit Serum was heat inactivated at 56°C for30 minutes and then absorbed three times with washed, packed human group 0, Rh+ erythrocytes volume for vol­ ume. One ml of this inactivated and absorbed normal rabbit serum was added to 99 ml of 0.15 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.3, making a 1 par cent solution to bo used in all passive hemagglutination techniques. Saturated Ammonium Sul-fate Solution — Seventy-five grams of (NH^gSO/j, were added to 100 ml distilled water at room temperature. 2?

This saturated solution was used for tho precipitation of gamma glob- ulin fractions of rheumatoid and normal sera.

Serological Procedures

Tho q uan titative micro- complement fix atio n mothod of Wasserman

and Lovino 92 ( ) was used with some modifications. Spectrophotometric Standardization of Sheep Erythrocytes — Sheep erythrocytes were washed with modified barbital buffer until the supernatant was free of hemolysis. A suspension of these washed and packed erythrocytes which upon lysis had an optical density reading of

O.7O at 413 mu in a Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 20 spectrophotometer was made in modified barbital buffer. To lyse the red blood colls, 0.4 ral of the blood coll suspension was added to 2.4 ml distilled water and then thoroughly mixed. The suspension of erythrocytes was adjusted with washed and packed cells until tho lysing procedure produced an optical density reading of0.70 a t 413 mu. Titration of anti-Shsep Erythrocyte Hemolysin — Commercially prepared sheep erythrocyte hemolysin (Grand Island Biologicals, Grand. Island, New York) was pooled and subsequently was titrated against tho

standardized sheep erythrocyte suspension. Tho highest dilution of hemolysin which caused complete hemolysis in an excess of complement was used fo r a l l the complement fix atio n reactions. I t was stored a t refrigerator temperature.

Preparation of Sensitised Sheep Erythrocytes — The standard­

ized suspension of sheep erythrocytes was incubated with tho proper 28 dilution of hemolysin for one hour at 37°C before the cells were added to the test system proper. Titration of Guinea Pig Serum Complement — Guinea pig com­ plement (Grand Island B iologicals, Grand Island, New York) was recon­ stituted, pooled, and titrated as follows. A 1:200 dilution of pooled complement was made in tho modified b a rb ita l b uffer. A series of tubes was se t up in to which various amounts of the 1:200 complement dilution were added, ranging from 0.05 ml to 0.80 ml. The volume was then brought to a total of 2,4 ml by the addition of barbital buffer. These tubes were then incubated for 18 hours at 4°C before the ad­ d itio n of the sensitized erythrocyte suspension since complement loses approximately 30 per cent of its activity in dilute solutions under those conditions. After this incubation period, 0.4 ml of the sensi­ tized erythrocytes was added and the tubes were incubated at 37°0 for 30 minutes. At this time, the tubes were centrifuged in an Adams Serofuge for one minute. The supernatant fluid was then transferred to spectrophotomet er tubes and analyzed at 413 mu. The dilution of 1. complement used in the te s t procedure was th a t azaound which gave90 ' per cent homolysis of the standardized erythrocyte suspension. Titration of the Antigen — Serum dilutions ranging from 1:40 through 1:40,960 wore made in modified barbital buffer. The antigen used was soluble RNA of bovine liver origin (Nutritional Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio). The concentrations used ranged from 40 ug to 100 ug per ml. To each of the serum dilutions, the various antigen concen­ trations were added. Complement was added and the tubes were incu­ bated at 4°C for 18 hours. At the end of this time period, sensitized 29 sheep erythrocytes were added, and the hemolysis was read at 413 mu to determine the degree of complement fix atio n . Protocol for the Test System — To each of the tubes were added the following reagents. Each test system and control were set up in triplicate. Test System: Antibody — 0.4 ml of each dilution Antigen — 0.4 ml of each concentration Complement — 0.4 ml of d ilu tio n giving 90 per cent hemolysis of standardized RBC suspension Buffer — 1,2 ml

Antigen Control: Antigen — 0.4 ml Complement —■ 0.4 ml Buffer — 1.6 ml Antibody Control: Antibody — 0.4 ml Complement — 0.4 ml Buffer — 1.6 ml

100 per cent Hemolysis Contro l: . Complement — 0.8 ml. Buffer 1.6 ml

Complement Control : Complement — 0.4 ml Buffer ~~ 2.0 ml Cell Control: Buffer — 2.4 ml These tubes were then incubated for 18 hours at 4°C to insure maximum complement fix a tio n . At th is time, 0.4 ml of tho sensitized sheep erythrocytes were added and the entire mixture m s further incubated for 30 minutes at 3?°C. They were then analyzed spectrophotometrically at 413 mu. Since® tho standardized erythrocyte suspension has an optical density of 0 , 70 , the complement control should have an o p tical density of 0.63 because the 90 par cent hemolysis endpoint is used in 30 th is procedure. The percentage of complement fix atio n was determined hy observing the difference in optical density readings of the test system and the antibody control. The change in optical density di­ vided by the optical density of the antibody control when multiplied by 100 indicated the percentage of complement fix atio n . In h ib itio n Studies with the Q uantitative Micro-Complement Fixation Technique — For inhibition studies, nucleotides, nucleosides, ribose, ribose phosphate, DM and RNA were made up in modified barbital buffer to a concentration of 100 ug per ml. From these stock solu­ tions, concentrations of 4, 8, 12, and 16 ug per ml were prepared in modified barbital buffer. The pH of each solution prepared in this manner ranged between 7.2 and 7.4. The sera to be teste d were d i­ luted in these inhibitor dilutions to the desired concentration of antibody and were allowed to incubate for 24 hours at 4-°C„ At this time, 0,4 ml of the antigen concentration and 0.4 ml of complement were added to the system, and the entire mixture was incubated for an ad­ ditional 18 hours at 4°C. Sensitised sheep erythrocytes were added and further incubation at 37°0 for 30 minutes was carried out. The tubes were then centrifuged, and the supernatant fluid transferred to spectrophotometer tubes. Analysis was carried out at 413 max. To determine the percentage of complement fix atio n in h ib itio n , the optical density of the tost system is divided by the optical density of the antibody control and multiplied by 100. Passive Hemagglutination Technique — The passive hemagglutin­ ation technique as described by Bigley, et al (15) was carried out in which antigens were covalently coupled to human group 0, Rht red blood 31 cells with bis-diazotized benzidine vising both precipitated gamma globulins and serum fractions from gel filtration of rheumatoid arth­ ritis sera. Bis-diazotized benzidine was prepared using the pro­

cedure of Gordon, et al36 (). To 0.23 grams of benzidine base in ^5 ml of 0.2 N HC1, 0.175 gram of KaNO^ in 5.0 ml of distilled water was added at 0°C. The reaction proceeded for 30 minutes with stirring. The material was divaried into 0.7 ml aliquots and was quickly frozen in a dry ice—acetone bath at -78°C. It was stored at ~70°C until use when it was used in a 1:16 dilution in phosphate buffer, pH 7.3. Coupling of Antigens to Erythrocytes — To couple the antigens to the erythrocytes, the following'procedure was visc-d. Freshly ob­ tained human group 0, Rh+ erythrocytes were washed with 0.15 M phos­ phate buffer until there were no traces of hemolysis in the superna­

tant fluid. To 9.75 m3, of phosphato buffer was added 0.25 ml of washed, packed erythrocytes, followed by thorough mixing. The antigens to be coupled to the erythrocytes were added at a final concentration .of 1000 ug per ml. Then 0.5 ml of the 1:16 dilution of bis-diazotized benzidine was added to the erythrocyte mixture. This was fol3.owed by incubation at room temperature for 10 minutes with frequent mixing. At the end of this time, the sensitized cells were centrifuged and washed once with a 1 per cent solution of normal rabbit serum--phosphate buffer. The colls were centrifuged and resuspended in the rabbit serum—phosphate buffer solution. Titrations — The pooled gamma" globulin fractions as well as the fractions obtained from Sephadex gel filtration were spectrophoto- metrica3.1y standardised to 1500 ug per ml using a Beckman DU 32 spectrophotometer and an light source* Doubling dilutions were made in 0.5 ml amounts in normal rab b it serum—phosphate buffer. For the titrations, to each of those dilutions 0.1 ml of the coupled antigen preparation was added. The mixture was then incubated at 3?°C for 30 Minutes at which time the tubes were centrifuged for 30 seconds in an Adams Serofuge. The tubes wore gently tapped to break up the pellet of cells and were observed for both, macroscopic and micro­ scopic agglutination. The degree of macroscopic hemagglutination was determined with maximum hemagglutination being designated as 4+ while microscopic agglutination was determined on a plus or minus basis, Hemagglutlnln Absorption — After titrations were performed, serum samp3.es wero absorbed with each of the antigens. The coupled c e lls were centrifuged and added on a volume fo r volmu© ra tio with the antiserum. They wore then incubated fo r 60 minutes a t 37°C. Hie ab­ sorbed sera wore then tested for reactivity with the absorbing antigen by microscopic examination. Absorptions were continued until there was no reactivity demonstrable for the absorbant. Tho absorbs! sera were then tested against tho remaining antigens in the samo manner as described above. In the cases of ribose and ribose phosphate, tho sera were inhibited with 20,000 ug per ml of these substances before testing sine© these two compounds cannot b© coup3_ed to erythrocytes with bis- diazotiaed benzidine. Base Pair Absorptions — Passive absorptions were performed using two bases coupled to human group 0, I?h+ erythrocytes, Mixtures of the base pairs A-C, A~T, A-U, G-C, G~T, and G-U were prepared to a final concentration of 1000 ug per m3., lia3Lf of which was a purino base 33 and the other half a pyrimidine base. Absorptions were made until there was no reactivity with the absorbants. The absorbed sera were then tested with the other antigenic substances and were examined for both macroscopic and microscopic hemagglutination Precipitation of Gamma Globulins with Ammonium Sulfate ~ Kheumatoid a rth r itis and normal serum pools were used, Y7ith constant stirring, ammonium sulfate solution, saturated at room temperature, was added dropwise to effect one-third saturation. At the completion of the ammonium sulfate addition, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.8 with 1 N NaOH. The suspension was then stirred for two hours after which it was centrifuged at room temperature for30 minutes. The precipitate was dissolved in phosphate buffer, pH 7.3, to its orig­ inal volume. Two additional precipitations were performed as above in order to purify the gamma globulin fraction. After the last pre­ cipitation, the final volume of phosphate buffer used to dissolve the precipitate was one-half the original volume. Dialysis of this glob­ ulin solution against distilled water was carried out at ^°C for three days with frequent changes of water. The globulins were then dialyzed against phosphate buffer, pH 7.3, for ?J-V hours. They were then con­ centrated by using a 5 per cent solution of Aquacide, Standardization of the globulins to 1500 ug was then performed using the phosphate buffer as the diluent. Sephadex Gel F iltra tion — Sephadex G-100 and G-200 were used to fractionate undiluted sera. The gels were allowed to swell for at least 72 hours in an excess of 0.1 M Tris HC1, pH 8.0, in 1 M NaC3., Two 45 centimeter by 2.5 centimeter columns were used. Packing of the y - v columns was done separately and then were connected to each other. To pack the solumns, a small amount of the Tris—NaCl buff ex' was added to each of the solumns „ The slurry was then added to almost completely f i l l each column. Air bubbles were removed by s tirrin g with a glass rod. The outlet was then opened and the buff ex- was allowed to leave the column. When the buffer lev el was about one inch above the packed gel, more slurry was added and followed by stirring in order to remove a ir bubbles as woll as to avoid the formation of an in te r­ face between the packed gol and the new slurry. When tho layer of packed gel reached a level of 10 centimeters from tho top of the column, a sample applicator was added to the G-100 column. At the top of the G-200 column, an upward flow adaptor was placed. The upward flow adaptor was connected to a Uvicord Scanner (LKB Productur, Stock­ holm, Sweden). The G-100 column was connected to the G-200 column so that the G-100 acted as a descending filtration gel and tho G-200 acted as an ascending filtor. A buffer reservoir of 0,1 H Tris—NaCl was connected to the G-100 column. To apply the sample, buffer was allowed to leave the system until it was at the level of the gel be­ low tho sample app licator. Throo ml of undiluted sera were placed in the sample applicator and were allowed, to enter tho gal. The buff ex* reservoir was then reconnected and the column allowed to fill to tho top. Tho flow rate was maintained at 20 to 25 ml per hour. Tho frac­ tions obtained were dialyacd against frequent changes of distilled water for two days at ^°C and then were restored to their original vol­ umes in either modified barbital buffer or phosphate buffer, pH 7-3» after concentration using a 5 per cent solution of Aquacide. The 35 samples were checked electrophoretically for purity. Only the peak of the 7S fraction was collected to avoid contamination by other serum components, Electrophoresis Procedures — Whole rheumatoid arthritis sera and normal sera as well as their fractions were subjected to electro­ phoresis vising the Gelman Model 513-70 Electrophoresis Chamber and cellulose polyacetate electrophoresis strips (Gelman Instrument Com­ pany, Ann Arbor, Michigan), Tho technique used was that described in the Gelman Manual #70176-B (35)• Scanning of the stained and cleared strips was performed on a Beckman Analytrol equipped with a Gelman Scanatron, Conglutination Technlque A 0.5 per cent suspension of sheep red blood cells was sensitized with whole bovine serum which was heated at 56°C for 30 minutes. A 1:5 dilution of horso serum served as the source of complement. Rheumatoid sera as w ell as normal sera were heat inactivated at56°C fo r 30 minutes and absorbedk times with washed, packed sheep erythrocytes, after which serial doubling di­ lutions were made in saline. Each tube contained the following mate­ rials: 0.5 ml of a 1:5 dilution of horse serum; 0.5 ml sensitized sheep erythrocytes; and 0.5 ml of test serum dilution in saline. The tubes were incubated at 37° C for 30 minutes, centrifuged inAdams an Serofugs for ^5 seconds and were read for hemagglutination with maxi­ mum hemagglutination designated as *M-. Positive controls consisting of bovine serum as a source of conglutinin, and negative controls con­ sisting of cell suspensions prepared with heat inactivated horse serum 36 wore included in each ’experiment. The titer was expressed as the last tube to show positive agglutination on resuspension of the pellet. RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTATION

The purpose of this investigation was to study and delineate further and more completely the specificity of anti-nucleic acid antibodies in the sera of individuals with clinically diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis as well as in tho sera of normal adult individ­ uals. Twenty-five pooled sera wore used in all sorological studies. These pools were made up from serially obtained bleedings of 25 indi­ viduals whose sera were shown previously to contain antibodies to RNA by the bentonite flocculation method. Nineteen of the serum pools were from patients who showed positive latex flocculation reactions for the rheumatoid factor at each bleeding. Six pooled samples wore included from patients with positive reactions with RNA-bsntonite but with negative latex flocculation reactivities. In addition to these pathologic sera, _s.er& from five normal, healthy adults were also studied for their anti-nucleic acid specificities. Tho quantitative micro-complement fixation technique of Was- serraan and Levine (92) was employed to determine the percentage d if­ ferences in the inhibitory capacity of various nucleotides, nucleo­ sides, and bases as well as DNA, RNA, sodium ribonueleate, sodium deoxyribonueleate, ribose and ribose phosphate. This technique em­ ploys the 90 per cent endpoint of ly sis as the d ilu tio n of complement to be used.

37 38

Dilutions of normal serum in modified barbital buffer were made ranging.from 1:40 to 1:40,960, The concentrations of RNA used ranged from 100 ug par ini to 40 ug per ml. Each serum d ilu tio n was tested with each of tho antigen concentrations in order to determine the dilution of serum and concentration of antigen which would produce optimal complement fix atio n . A concentration of 4-0 ug RNA per ml and a 1:5120 d ilu tio n of normal human serum brought about maximum comple­ ment fix atio n . The actu al concentration of RNA used was 16 ug per 0.4 ml since th a t volume was the one used in the actual te s t pro­ cedure. In order to study the specificity of the reaction, the sera were diluted, to the proper dilution by using inhibitor—modified bar­ bital buffer solution as the diluent. Four concentrations of each in­ hibitor wore prepared—4, 8, 12, and 16 ug per ml. The results of these inhibition studies appear in the following Tables. Table 1 shows the relative effectiveness of tho purine and pyrimidine bases as in h ib ito rs of complement fix atio n . I t is to be noted that guanine is most effective at a concentration of 12 ug per ml. with the remaining concentrations being less e ffic ie n t. However, the other purine base adenine is most effective a t i t s maximal con­ centration of 16 ug per ml. Similarly, the pyrimidine bases uracil and cytosine appear most effective at 12 ug per ml concentration while thymine is most effective at a concentration of 16 ug per ml. On an overall view, however, cytosine and thymine are not as good as in­ hibiting agents as is uracil on a percentage basis. It should be noted. th a t the pyrimidine bases inhibi.t complement fix atio n to a much higher degree than do the purine bases.

TABLE 1 .—Percentage of complement fix atio n in h ib itio n of anti-RM activity in normal human serum by pur line and pyrimidine bases

In h ib ito r Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4 8 12 16

Purine Bases Guanine 15 24 33 14 Adenine 12 16 27 42 Pyrimidine Bases U racil 36 68 78 63 Cytosine 33 50 70 61 Thymine 4 16 18 58

Table 2 shows the inhibitory effects of several, upon normal serum. Ui’idinc was the most inhibitory substance tested with peak activity7- at 12 ug per ml concentration. Furthermore, cyti- dine also had its greatest effect at the same concentration while guanosine displayed peak reactivity at the 8 ug per ml level. As was previously shown with the bases, the pyrimidine ribonucleosides were much more effective as inhibitors than were the purine ribonucleosides

TABLE 2 .—Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of anti-RM activity in normal human serum by pur ino and pyrimidine ribonucleosides

In h ib ito r Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4 8 12 16

Uridine 58 81 91 85 Cytidine 27 30 42 20 Guanosine 13 36 14 14 40

Ribonucleotide inhibitions of normal sera are shown in Table 3. Adenylic acid and cytidylic acid appear to be equally inhibitory at 12 ug, but cytidylic acid is much more effective at the lower eon- centrations whereas adenylic acid is more effective at the higher con­ centrations. Guanylic acid is only a moderate inhibitor at all con­ centrations while uridylic acid is the most effective overall inhibi­ tor. Thymidylic acid appears to be only a moderate inhibitor and is only effective at the highest concentration used. As lias been shown previously, a pyrimidine base compound is a much better inhibitor than the purine counterpart.

TABLE 3 .—Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of anti-RNA activity in normal human serum by purine ■ and pyrimidine ribonucleotides

In h ib ito r Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4- 8 12 16

Purine Ribonucleotides Adenylic acid 24- 36 80 76 Guanylic acid 31 4-2 4-5 4-7 Pyrimidine Ribonucleotides Uridylic acid 72 88 93 89 Cytidylic acid 74- 81 82 4-3 Thymidylic acid 11 33 40 73

In addition to comparing bases, ribonucleosides, and ribonuc­ leotides, comparisons were made among compounds containing the same base. Table 4 shows a summary of normal serum inhibitions with com­ pounds containing adenine. These data demonstrate that the greatest percentage of inhibition is obtained with adenylic acid at a concen­ tration of 12 ug per ml. Similarly, shows a 41 a psak inh ib itio n a t 12 ug. Adenine displays maxamua complement fix - ation inhibition at 16 ug. Furthermore, adenosine triphosphate ap­ pears to be a better inhibitor at lower concentrations than either adenylic acid or adenine.

TABLE 4 .—-Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of anti-RNA activity in normal human serum by adenine-containing compounds

Inhibitor Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4 8 12 16

Adenylic acid 24 36 80 76 Adenosine triphosphate 28 42 45 37 Adenine 12 16 2 7 42

The a c tiv itie s of other purine compounds, the derivatives of guanine, are summarized in Table 5.

TABLE 5. -—Percentage of complement fix atio n in h ib itio n of anti-RNA activity in normal human serum by guanine-containing compounds

Inhibitor Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4 8 12 16

Guanylic acid 31 42 45 47 Guanine 15 24 33 14 Guanosine 13 36 14 14

Here, again, the ribonucleotide, guanylic acid, is a much bet­ te r in h ib ito r of complement fix atio n than the base guanine or the ribo- nucleosid© guanosine. Guanosine reaches a maximum activity at 8 ug while guanine itself has maximal activity at 12 ug. VJhon guanine containing compounds are compared with tho adenine containing k-2 corapounds, it is obviotis that the purine adenine and its derivatives are much more effective as inhibitors than are guanine and its derivatives. The inhibitory activity of the three available cytosine com­ pounds, cytosine, cytidine, and cytidylic acid are shown in 6 Table.

TABLE 6,—Percentage of complement fix atio n in h ibition of anti-RNA activity in normal human serum by cytosine-containing compounds

Inhibitor Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4 8 12 16

Cytidylic acid 74 81 82 43 Cytosine 33 50 70 61 Cy tid ie s 27 30 h2 20

The pyrimidine ribonucleotide cytidylic acid is generally the best inhibitor at concentration of12 ug per ml or le s s, but i t s in­ hibitory effect declines sharply at a concentration of 16 ug. The base, cytosine, is' intermediate in its inhibitory capabilities. The ribonucleoside cytidine is the least effoctivo inhibitor of tho group. Furthermore, it should bo noted that all three compounds exhibit their peak inhibitory activity at 12 ug with marked decreases occurring a t

16 ug with the derivatives cytidine and cytidylic acid while the in­ hibitory effect of the base cytosine declines much more gradually. Table 7 is a summary of the inhibitory activity of thymine containing compounds on the anti-RNA present in pooled normal sora. The greatest inhibition was achieved by thyroidylic acid, followed by thymidine phosphate and thymine. It appears that thymidylic acid is the best inhibitor. All the compounds inhibited maximally at tho 43

16 ug per ml concentration with thymidine phosphate being a much bet­ ter inhibitor at concentrations of 4, 8, and 12 ug than either thymi­ dylic acid or thymine.

TABLE 7 .—-Percentage of complement fixation in h ibition of anti-ENA activity in normal human serum by thymine-containing compounds

Inhibitor Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4 8 12 16

Thymidylic acid 11 33 40 73 Thymidine phosphate 46 50 56 62 Thymine 4 16 18 58

In order to detect tho antibody specificities directly related to anti-ENA antibodies, four uracil containing compounds were utilised in tho inhibition procedure (Table 8).

TABLE 8 .—Percentage of complement fix atio n inh ib itio n of anti-RNA activity in normal human serum by uracil-containing compounds

Inhibitor Concentration of Inhibitor (ug) 4 8 12 16

Uridylic acid 72 88 93 89 Uridine 58 81 91 85 U racil 36 68 78 63 Uridine phosphate 17 30 48 40

U rydilic acid is the most powerful in h ib ito r of complement fixation. This inhibitory capacity of uridylic acid is followed closely by uridine and uracil with uridine phosphate being the least efficient inhibitor. Furthermore, it is obvious that peak inhibitory reactivity appears to occur at 12 ug per ml concentrations in all 44- cases. Generally, the pyrimidines and their derivatives are much bet­ te r in h ib ito rs of the normal sera anti-RNA re a c tiv ity than are the purines. In addition, the ribonucleotides are by far the best inhib­ ito rs of th is complement fix atio n reaction than are any of the other derivatives, the nucleosides and the bases. Similar studies were carried out using the deoxy- counterparts of the nucleosides and nucleotides as w ell as sodium ribonucleate, sodium deoxyribonucleate, ribose, ribose phosphate, DNA and KNA. The results of these examinations indicate that the presence of in place of ribose had no marked effect upon the inhibitions of com­ plement fixation by normal human serum. In a similar manner, the action of ribose and ribose phosphate closely parallel each other in inhibitory activity indicating the importance of ribose as opposed to the phosphate group in this inhibitory activity. The maximum inhi­ bition obtained with sodium deoxyribonucleate was only17 per cent at the 16 ug per ml concentration. DNA was only weakly effectiv e as an inhibitor with a maximum of only 8 per cent inhibition whereas RNA pro­ duced between90 and 100 per cent inhibition at all four concentra­ tions. Sodium ribonucleate was not as effective as RNA; however, the maximum inhibition produced was 75 per cent which is considerably higher than the 17 per cent inhibition produced by sodium deoxyribo­ nucleate. Similar studies were undertaken in order to determine more quantitatively the purine and pyrimidine specificities of rheumatoid arthritis sera pool. However, all the rheumatoid arthritis sera were anticomplemantary at all the dilutions used from 1:4-0 to 1;4-0,960 and with all antigen concentrations. Further dilution of tho sora beyond 1:40,960 resulted in a diluting out of the antieomplementary factor(s) of the serum; but, the serum then possessed no reactivity with KNA at any concentration used. Sephadex gel filtration fractionations were performed on each of the pools to determine if the antieomplementary factor(s) was localised in a particular serum fraction. When the 193 and 7S serum fractio n s were tested in the same manner as the whole sera, sim ilar results were obtained. The antieomplementary factor was still removed by dilution, but ENA reactivity was also lost. Analyses in the Uvi- cord Analyzer and accompanying recorder failed to show the presence of any complex which was eluted before the 3.93 frac tio n . Only the peaks of the two globulin fractions were collected. Since these fractions were found to be e3.ectrophoretica3.ly pure, it was obvious that no in­ soluble complexes which non-specifically bound complement were found present in the separated globulin fractions of the rheumatoid arth­ ritis sera from Sephadex gel filtration. In order to determine if small complexes did exist in the whole sera, electrophoresis employing cellulose polyacetate strips was performed upon fifteen rheumatoid arthritis sera pools as well as upon tho normal sera. With this technique, if such complexes existed, they wou3.d remain at tho point of application of the sample, not mi­ grating in the electric field. The results of the whole serum elec­ trophoresis appear in Table 9. 46

TABLE 9.-’■-■Results of whole serum electrophoresis of rheumatoid arth­ ritis sera and normal sera

Serum Sample Percentage Composition of Various Serum Components Gamma Beta Alpha Globulin Globulin Globulin Albumin

Rheumatoid Pool 1 21.2 8.0 17.4 53.4

2 8.35 8.35 12.5 70.8 3 15.6 12.1 18.1 54.2 4 16.3 6.7 14.8 62.2

5 16.5 5.5 14.5 63.5 6 19.7 14.1 18.3 47.9 7 13.8 7.9 . 15.8 62.5 8 13.75 13.75 23.6 48.8 9 13.3 6.8 13.3 66.6 10 16.8 7.8 22.1 53.3 11 24.4 6.9 16.4 52.3 12 11.3 11.3 16.1 61.3 13 18.5 12.3, 17.3 51.9 14 27.6 5.75 13.8 52.85

15 13.8 7.9 15.8 62.5 Normal Serum N1 17.2 10.3 11.9 60.6

N2 18.1 10.8 12.4 58.7 N3 2.0.0 11.4 11.5 57.1 N4 16.4 11.9 12.0 59.7 N5 15.0 10.9 11.8 62.3 47 None of the cellulose polyacetate strips (after staining and clearing) displayed any non-migrating component a t the point of ap­ plication of tho sample. The range of gamma globulin percentage com­

position extends from 8.35 to27.6 per cent with the majority of the samples containing between 13 and 18 per cent. Normal serum values ranged between 15 and 20 per cent. A wide range in the percentage of beta globulin was not apparent, although the extremes of 5.5 per cent and 14.1 per cent are possibly significant since the normal average is between 10 and 12 per cent. Eight samples contained less beta glob­ ulin than the average concentration while tho remainder either fell within the normal limits or were slightly elevated. The alpha globu­ lin fractions showed a marked increase above the average concentration of 13. to 12 per cent in normal sera. The range varied between a lower limit of 12.5 por cent to an upper limit of 23.6 per cent. All the rheumatoid sera contained more a3.pha globulin than the average of 12 per cent. There was only an occasional instance of the albumin con­ centration's varying beyond the limits established for the normal sera. There were two cases in which this fraction was significantly reduced when it fell to 47.9 and 48.9 per cent. Moreover, there were

two sera which showed a. marked increase in albumin concentration,70.8 and 66.6 per cent. Further work was undertaken to determine the nature of the antieomplementary serum factor. The twenty-five serum pools and the five normal human sera were screened for serologically detectable antibody activity directed toward complement, using the conglutination reaction. The results of this screening are shown in Table 3.0. 48 TABLE 10,—Conglxitination reactivity of rheumatoid arthritis sera and normal sera

Serum Sample Reciprocal of Serum Dilution 2 4 8 16 32 6 k 128 256 512 102 k

Rheumatoid Pool 1 44 4 4 3+ 2 4 1 4 - - - -

2 4 4 4 4 zpj- 3 4 2 4 1 4 -- --

3 3+ 2 4 1 4 ------

k 3+ 2 4 1 4 ------

5 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 1 4 -- ~ - -

6 1 4

7 2 + 1+ ------

8 3+ 2+ 1 4 ~ - ~ - -- -

9 3+ 2+ 1 4 .. -- - --

10 2 4 1+ ------

1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 2 4 1 4 -

1 2 4 4 4 4 4+ 3 4 2 4 1 4 -- - -

1 3 4 4 3+ 2 4 1 4 - -- ~ - -

1 4 3+ 2+ 1 4 ------

1 5 3+ 2 4 1 4 -- - - _ - -

1 6 1 4 - .. ------

1 7 3+ 2+ 1 4 -- -- „ - -

18 4 4 4 4 4 + 4 4 3 4 2 4 1 4 - „ -

19 2 4 1 4 - - - - ~ _ -

20 4 4 3-1- 2 4 1 4 _ - ■» - - --

21 1+

22 3+ 2 4 1 4 ... 49

TABLE 1 0 ,— Continued.

Serum Sample Reciprocal of Serum Dilution 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024

23 3+ 2+ 1+ ------

24 4t 4t 4'i’ 3+ 2*1" l : ’r - - -

25 ------Normal Serum N1 N2 - ~ ~ - - - -

N3 --- - _ - - - - N4 - -- .. - - - - -

H5 1+

As the table illustrates, twenty-four of the twenty-five rheum­ atoid arthritis serum pools demonstrated antibody reactivity directed toward complement. Thirty-six per cent of the sera possessed a titer of 16 or greater while 64 per cent had titers of less than 16. Only on® of the normal sera which were tested in a similar manner demon­ strated any reactivity (titer of 2). The remaining 4 sera possessed no reactivity. Considering the previous results in which no detectable insol­ uble complexes could be detected and the fact that antibodies to com­ plement exist in tho rheumatoid arthritis sera to such an extent that the quantitative micro-complement fixation technique could not be used, another method had to be employed in order to determine the sp e c ific ity of the anti-RNA antibodies found in the rheumatoid sera. 50

Previously, passive hemagglutination inhibition studies have been used to determine antibody specificity. However, in order to establish a relative order of antigenicity for tho various nucleotides, nucleo­ sides and bases, a series of passive hemagglutination absorptions were performed. Nineteen nucleotides, nucleosides, bases, nucleic acids and the sodium salts of the nucleic acids wore used in addition to ribose and ribose phosphate. Ammonium sulfate-precipitated globulins as well as the Sephadex-gol-filtration fractions corresponding to the 3-9S and 7S globulins were all tested after being spsctrophotometrieally stand­ ardized. No difference in overall serological reactivity between the 19S and 7S fractions was noted. Before the absorptions wore made, the sera were titrated against the nucleotides, nucleosides, bases, nucleic acids and the sodium salts of the nucleic acids coupled to human group 0, Rht erythrocytes. Those results appear in Table 11. Among the purine compounds used as antigens, adenosine was tho most reactive, followed by adenine, adenine phosphate, guanylic acid, adenylic acid and adenosine triphosphate. These data indicate that the primary reactivity is directed toward the nucleoside, thus emphasizing the importance of the sugar moiety in making tip the antigenic deter­ minant. Because of tho relative insolubility of guanine containing compounds, only guanylic acid could bo used. Obviously, no such statement can be made regarding the nucleoside of guanine.' The pyrimidine compounds, on the other hand, show a much stronger reactivity in the rheumatoid sera than do the purines. The rea.ctivj.ties of cytosine and its derivatives are essentially the same 51

TABLE 11.—Passive hemagglutination reactivity of rheumatoid arthritis sera with nucleic acids and their derivatives

Antigen Reciprocal of Serum Dilution 1 2 8 16 32

Adenine 3+ 2+ 1+ - -

Adenine phosphate 3ft 21 1*1* ~ ~

Adenosine J-H- 3+ 24* 1+ & - Adenylic acid 2+ 1+ - --

Adenosine triphosphate 2*1- 1+ -• ~ --

Guanylic acid 3+ 2+ 1+ -- -- Cytosine Lyr 3+ 2+ 1*1* - Cytidine 3+ 2* 1+ - - 3+ 2-1- 1+ - - Cytidylic acid ii^i- 3* 1+ - - -

Thymine 3+ 2-1- 1+ -- - -

Thymidine 3t 2 i 1+ -

Thymidine monophosphate l-l'r 3-1- 2+ l i -

Uracil i h lyv 3+ 2+ 1+ »

Uridine 4*i- 3*1- 24- 1+ ±

RNA k+ 4 * 3+ 2+ 1*1* ±

DNA 2+ 1+ -- -- -

Sodium ribonucleate 3+ 31 2+ 1+ ~ - Sodium deoxyribonucleate 2+ t -- -- -

with cytosine itself being perhaps a better reactant. Cytidine„ cyfci- dine monophosphate, and cytidylic acid are equal in their reactivities 52 with rheumatoid arthritis sera. Thymine and its compounds demonstrate a somewhat more varied activity. It is obvious that the nucleoside and tho phosphorylated nucleoside are more reactive than the base as is the case with the nucleoside of adenine. Of all the pyrimidines tested, uracil and uridine are the strongest antigens. Furthermore, the greater reactivity resides in the nucleoside as is true in all the preceding examples. When the sera were reacted with RNA, DNA, sodium ribonucleate, and sodium deoxyribonucleate, some interesting observations were made. The reactivity of the rheumatoid sera is markedly greater with RNA than with DNA. This is also the case with sodium ribonucleate as test antigen in comparison with sodium deoxyribonucleate. This is a direct reflection of the relative occurrence of antibodies to the nucleic acids in rheumatoid arthritis sera with RNA antibodies appearing more frequently than DNA antibodies. Furthermore, this difference is evi­ dent when the reactivities with the sodium salts are compared with those of the native nucleic acids. The decreased reactivity with the sodium s a lts is undoubtedly a refle ctio n of d iffe re n t base ra tio s and sequences which occurs from one source to another. Furthermore, the reactivity of uracil closely parallels that of RNA indicating its significance in antibody formation to RNA, Similar examinations were performed vising the dcoxy-counterpart of some of the nucleosides and nucleotides as te s t antigens in rheuma­ toid sera. Little or no reactivity occurred with these substances. It became imperative to determine the effect of nucleic acids and their derivatives as absorbants of the rheumatoid sera. The sora 53 were absorbed with antigen-coupled erythrocytes until no visible hemag­ glutination, either macroscopic or microscopic, occurred with the ab­ sorbing antigen. The absorbed sera were then reacted with the other compounds and the mixtures observed both macroscopically and micro- scopieally for hemagglutination. This was repeated for each of the substances used as antigens. With ribose and ribose phosphate, the sera were inhibited with a concentration of 20,000 ug per ml and then screoned for reactivity with the other coupled compounds. Reactivities were found in both tho 19S and 7S fractions from Sephadex gel filtra ­ tion. Moreover, when these serum fractions were absorbed and subse­ quently reacted with the remaining antigens, results’ were obtained which were id en tica l when Fraction I (19S) was compared with Fraction II (7S), indicating that the antibody heterogeneity is equally dis­ tributed between the two major globulin fractions. The results pre­ sented in Table 12 are those obtained using ammonium sulfate precipi­ tated and spectrophotometrically standardized gamma globulins from rheumatoid arthritis serum pools. The data appearing in Table 12 demonstrate many interesting aspects of anti-nucleic acid specific antibodies in rheumatoid sera. After absorption with adenine, adenine phosphate, and adenosine, there is only one major reactivity remaining in the sera, that being a cyto­ sine reactivity. Several interesting observations may be made on this point. Adenine containing compounds appear to be the most ubiquitous of all the nucleic acid subunits since absorptions with these three compounds removes all reactivity but that directed toward the natural base cytosine. Furthermore, these data indicate a second major TABLE 12,-—Resxilts of passive hemagglutination absorptions with various antigens upon rheumatoid a r th r itis sera

Absorbing Antigen Reactivity Removed R eactivity Remaining

Adenine Adenine Cytosine Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA Adenine phosphate Adenine Cytosine Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Thymine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA Adenosine Adenine Cytosine Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid 55

TABLE 12.—-Continued

Absorbing Antigen Reactivity Removed Reactivity Remaining

Thymine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA

Adenylic acid Adenine Cytosine Adenine phosphate Cytidine monophosphate Adenosine Thymidine Adenylic acid Sodium deoxyribonucleate Adenosine triphosphate Sodium ribonucleate Guanylic acid RNA Cytidine DNA Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Adenosine Adenine Cytosine triphosphate Adenine phosphate Cytidine monophosphate Adenosine Thymidine monophosphate Adenylic acid Uridine Adenosine triphosphate Sodium deoxyribonucleate Guanylic acid Sodium ribonucleate Cytidine RNA Cytidylic acid DNA Thymine Thymidine U racil Uridine

Guanylic acid Guanylic acid Adenine Cytidine Adenine phosphate Thymine Adenosine Thymidine Adenylic acid Thymidine monophosphate Adenosine triphosphate Uridine C ytosine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Cytidine RNA Cytidine monopho sphate DNA Cytidylic acid. 56

TABLE 12.—Continued

Absorbing Antigen R ea ctiv ity Removed Reactivity Remaining

Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA Cytosine Guanylic acid Adenine Cytosine Adenosine Cytidine Adenylic acid Cytidine monophosphate Adenine phosphate Cytidylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Thymine Thymidine monophosphate Thymidine U racil Uridino Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA Cytidine Adenine Adenine Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic- acid Cytosine Thymidine Cytidine Thymidine monopho sphate Cytidine monophosphate U racil Cytidylic acid Sodium ribonucleate Thymine RNA Thymidine DNA Thymidine monophosphate Uracil Uridine Sodium ribonucleate Sodium deoxyribonucleate RNA DNA

C y t id in e Adenine Adenine phosphate Guanylic acid Adenosine Thymine Adenosine triphosphate U racil Adenylic acid Uridine Cytidine RNA 5 7

TABLE 12.—Continued

Absorbing Antigen R eactivity Removed R eactivity Remaining

Cytosine DNA Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate Sodium deoxyribonucleate Cytidylic acid Adenosine Adenine Guanylic acid . Adenine phosphate Cytosine Adenosine Cytidine Adenylic acid Cytosine monophosphate Adenosine triphosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine U racil Thymidine monophosphate Uridine Sodium ribonucleate Sodium deoxyribonucleate RNA DNA Thymine Adenine Adenine Adenine phosphate Adenine phosphate Adenosine Guanylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Cytosine Adenylic acid Cytidine Cytosine Uracil Cytidine Uridine Cytidine monophosphate Sodium ribonucleate Cytidylic acid RNA Thymine Thymidine Thynidine monophosphate Sodium deoxyribonucleate DNA

Thymidine Adenine Adenine Adenosine triphosphate Adenine phosphate Guanylic acid Adenosine Cytidine Adenylic acid Cytidine monophosphate Cytosine Thymine Cytidine Uridine Cytidylic acid Thymidine monophosphate Uracil Sodium deoxyribonucleate Uridine Sodium ribonucleate DNA RNA 58

TABLE 12.—-Continued

Absorbing Antigen Reactivity Removed R ea ctiv ity Remaining

Thymidine Adenine Adenine monophosphate Adenine phosphate Adenine phosphate Adenosine triphosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Guanylic acid Cytidine monophosphate Cytosine Cytidylic acid Cytidine Thymine U racil Thymidine monophosphate Uridine U racil Sodium ribonucleate Sodium deoxyribonucleate RNA DNA U racil Adenine phosphate Adenino Adenosine Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Adenylic acid Cytosine Thymine Cytidine Thymidine Cytidins monopho sphate Thymidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid RNA Thymidine monophosphate DNA U racil Uridine Sodium ribonucleate Sodium deoxyribonuc 1 e?.te DNA

Uridine Adenine Adenine phosphate Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Guanylic acid Thymine Cytosine Thymidine Cytidine Uracil Cytidine monophosphate Uridine Cytidylic acid Sodium ribonucleate Thymidine monophosphate Sodium deoxyribonucl.eato Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA

Sodium Adenine Adenine phosphate ribonucleate Adenosine triphosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Cytosine Thymine Cytidine 59

TABLE 1 2 .- - Contin vied

Absorbing Antigen Reactivity Removed Reactivity Remaining

Thymidine Cytidine monophosphate Thymidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid U racil Thyrddine Uridine Sodium dcoxyribonncleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA Sodium Adenylic acid Adenine deoxyribonucleate Guanylic acid Adenine phosphate Sodium ribonucleate Adenosine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Adenosine triphosphate RNA Cytosine DNA Cytidine Cytidine monophosphato Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate Uridine Sodium ribonucleate RNA Adenine Adenine Adenine phosphate Adenine phosphato Adenylic acid Adonos ine triphos phate Guanylic acid Guanylic acid Cytosine Thymine Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thyriddi.no Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA

DNA Adenine Adenosine triphosphate Adenine phosphate Guanylic acid Adenosine U racil Adenylic acid Uridine Cytosine Cytidine 6o

TABLE 12.—Continued

Absorbing Antigen Reactivity Removed R eactivity Remaining

Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine Thymidine- monophosphate Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA

Ribose Adenine Adenine (inhibition) Adenine phosphate Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenosine triphosphate Adenylic acid Cytosine Guanylic acid Cytidylic acid Cytidine Thymidine Cytidine monophosphate Thymidine monophosphate Thymine Sodium ribonucleate Thymidine Sodium deoxyribonucleate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA Ribose phosphate Adenine Adenine phosphate Adenosine triphosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Cytosine Cytidine Cytidylic acid Cytidine monophosphate U racil Thymine Uridine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA . DNA 61 specificity directed toward the pyrimidine ba.se cytosine, but not toward its derivatives. This seems to imply that in the case of cyto­ sine, there are two immune responses, one directed to the base itself and one directed to its metabolic derivatives. In addition to this, it appears that adenosine, adenine phosphate, and adenosine are major constituents of each antigenic determinant toward which each antibody combining site in the heterospecific population of nucleic acid anti­ bodies is directed. After absorptions were made with two more adenine containing compounds, adenylic acid and adenosine triphosphate (which are more complex), numerous antibodies remained for many other te s t compounds. However, cytosine sp e c ific ity is s t i l l present a fte r ab­ sorption with these compounds. Moreover, the reactiv e compounds le f t are all pyrimidine or pyrimidine containing compounds in both cases, emphasizing the fact that there are two basic specificities involved with rheumatoid arthritis sera, a purine specificity and a pyrimidine specificity. Adenylic acid removes cytidine and cytidylic acid reac­ tivity but leaves cytosine and cytidine monophosphate specific anti­ bodies. This implies two further considerations. In certain anti­ genic determinants, adenylic acid and cytidino (or cyt.idy3.ie acid) can be found together whereas in others, cytosine and cytidine monophos­ phate are present, but not in combination with adenylic acid. SiutiJ.ar reasoning can be used, to explain tho removal of thymine and thymidine monophosphate activity while thymidine reactive antibodies are still present. This rationa3.e leads to a second important fact. The nuc­ leotides appear to be degraded to different levels before they are processed by the body preceding antibody formation. Therefore, these 62

data also indicate that adenine and its less complex derivatives adenine phosphate and adenosine are much more dominant antigenically and. appear more often as antigens than do adenosine triphosphate and adenylic acid. Furthermore, the fact that antibodies remain which are capable of reacting with RNA, DNA, and their sodium salts is a measure of proof of the hypothesis that tho combining sites of nucleic acid antibodies are directed toward a sequence of bases, nucleotides, and nucleosides. The antibodies remaining after absorption still have specificities in the combining sites for portions of the RNA molecule which are devoid of the particular absorbing nucleic acid component. In a similar manner, gue.ny3.ic acid absorption leaves behind all reactivity for tho other purine base adenine and its derivatives while removing pyrimidine specific antibodies. This indicates that tho relationship of guanine to the total activity of the serum is not as important as that of adenine, and that guanine and adenine together are seldom found instrum ental in making up a portion of the antigenic determinant. It appears, moreover, that guanine specificity is mono closely linked to pyrimidine specificity than to piirina specificity. The above data also indicate the significance of the base in determining specificity. In the case of adenine, the base alone re­ moves all reactivities directed against the more complex derivatives. The converse is also true since the derivative removes a3„l serum reac­ tivity directed against tho base.

The sera, when absorbed with- cytosine, s till retained activity for a ll of the adenine containing compounds and thymidine monophos­ phate, while at the same time removing antibodies to all of its own 63 derivatives as w ell as re a c tiv ity for u ra c il containing compounds, RNA, DNA and their sodium salts. These data further exemplify the dual an­ tigenic specificity present in the rheumatoid arthritis sera. In con­ trast to the cytosine absorptions, cytidine, cytidine monophosphate, and cytidylic acid absorptions did not remove all adenine reactivity. This may be a refle ctio n of the degree of enzymatic breakdown which occurs before antigen processing and subsequent antibody production. In the case of absorption with cytidine, some reactivity remains for adenine and adenosine while some reactivity for adenine, adenine phosphate, and adenylic acid is removed. The fact that adenine reac­ tiv ity is both removed and retained implies th a t cytidine and adenine mice up part of the antigenic determinant for some antibodies while in other determinants cytidine is totally absent. Cytidine monophos­ phate appears to remove adenine reactivity to a much greater extent than does cytidine whereas cytidylic acid is least effective in such absorptions, After absorption with cytosine containing compounds, some sera retained serological reactivity for other nucleic acid subunits while other sera demonstrated no reactivity when tested with the same con­ stituents. This further helps to define tho antigenic determinants. Cytidine and cytidine monophosphate appear more effective in the re­ moval of thymine containing compounds while cytosine and cytidylic acid are not as effective. This fact seems to indicate a relationship between cytosine in the antigenic determinants complementary to certain antibody combining sites. 6t

Cytosine, cytidine, and cytidylic acid also appear to play an important part in the overall specificity of nucleic acid antibody since reactivity for the nucleic acids and their salts is completely removed by these substances,, This fact, plus the similar capacity of adenine, adenine phosphate, and adenosine, reflects the relative anti­ genicity of these compounds. The pyrimidine thymine and two of its derivatives, thymidine and thymidine monophosphate, were also used as absorbing antigens. Thymine and thyraidino monophosphate were very effective in removing serum reactivities directed against adenine and cytosine containing compounds while thymidine was not nearly as effective an absorbant. Since thymine is an in trin s ic component of DNA, i t is not surprising to find it capable of completely removing DNA reactivities as well as those directed against sodium deoxyribonucleate and sodium ribonuc­ le a te . However, when thymidine was vised as absorbant, uridine reac­ tiv ity was removed as w ell as th a t fo r thymidine monophosphate, u ra c il, sodium ribonucleate, and KNA. Since thymine is uracil with a methyl group substituted at the 5 position of the pyrimidine ring, cross- reactivities and. cross-absorptions undoubtedly occur. This observation is supported by the data obtained from uracil and. uridine absorptions. Uracil is not as effective an absorbant in removing thymine reactivity as is uridine. However, uridine did not absorb serum antibodies directed against cytosine compounds whereas uracil removed reactivities from the same sera for all tested cytosine containing compounds. The basis for antigenic relatedness between uracil and cytosine may result from their structural similarity which 65 differs only by the presence of an amino group at position *!- on the cytosine molecule instead of an oxygen molecule at the same position on uracil. These two compounds are more closely related to each other than they are to thymine which has substitutions at both positions 4- and 5. The difference between uracil and uridine as absorbants of anti-cytosine reactivity may result from differences in overall con­ figurational aspects of the base uracil and its nucleoside uridine. The cross-reactivity between uracil and thymine is clearly shown by the capacity of both to remove DNA and RNA re a c tiv itie s . U racil is only found in RNA, and thymine is an integral part only of DNA. When tho nucleic acid salts were used as absorbing antigens, sodium ribonucleate was much more effective as an absorbing entity. I t removed a l l re a c tiv ity which was specific fo r RNA since there was no reactivity for uracil, uridine, or RNA in tho absorbed sera. From these data, the commercial sodium ribonucleate apparently contained base sequences lacking in cytosine content. Sodium deoxyribonucleate reactivity was left after absorption with sodiura ribonucleate indi­ cating that there were antibodies reacting with base sequences not found in the absorbant. Sodium deoxyribonucleate was unable to absorb many reactivities including those for all the cytosine and thymine com­ pounds as w ell as those for most of tho adenine compounds. This may bo of significance in vivo in that these two classes of compounds may readily serve as autoantigens through some type of antigenic modifi­ cation, RNA was a most efficient absorbant of the nucleic acid reac­ tivities directed against cytosine, thymine, and uracil compounds as 66 well as those for DNA, ENA, and their sodiura salts. After ENA ab­ sorptions, antibodies for only thymine, guanylic acid and a few adenine compounds remained,, Furthermore, DNA was also an effective' absorbant of these sera. It left behind serum reactivities directed toward uracil and its derivatives which are found as intimate constit­ uents of the RNA molecule. Inhibitions of serum by ribose and ribose phosphate also pro­ vided some interesting observations. Ribose blocked the serum reac­ tivities for all of the nucleoside compounds tested; however, it did not inhibit reactivities for some of the bases and those compounds which contained phosphate. The fact that there were overlapping re­ moval and retention of reactivities in several sera pools after inhi­ bition with ribose further indicates all stages of degradation of the intact nucleic acid are antigenic. Similar observations were, made with ribose phosphate as inhibitor. For instance, cytidine monophosphate reactivity was inhibited by ribose phosphate while cytosine and cyti­ dylic acid reactivity were not. These data stress the significance of the component and in influencing the antigenicity of these compounds. In these rheumatoid sera, a definite purine specificity direc­ ted predominantly against adenine compounds and an equally strong specificity for the pyrimidine cytosine existed. Consequently, the effects of absorption with the naturally occurring base pairs adenine- thymine (A--T) and guanine (guanylic acid)-cytosine (G-C) as well as the other non-naturally occurring possible combinations, adenine™ cytosine (A-C), adenine-uracil (A-U), guanine-uracil (G-U) and 67 guanine-thymine (G~T) were attempted. From the previous data, the A-C base pair vras predicted to be capable of removing all nucleic acid re­ activities from the rheumatoid sera. The results of these absorptions appear in Table 13. After the absorption by combinations of adenine and thymine, or adenine and uracil, only reactivity toward cytosine remained. Ab­ sorption with the adenine-cytosine pair removed all reactivity to the test antigens. This combination of bases is one which does not natu­ rally occur, but it does explicitly show the two basic specificities involved in rheumatoid arthritis sera, one directed, toward adenine and one directed toward cytosine. Moreover, the fact that reactivities for other cytosine derivatives were removed by absorption with the combination of adenine and cytosine strengthens the argument that the stage of nucleotide degradation as it occurs naturally is extremely im portant, Guanine-'thymine and guanine-cytosins absorptions of these rheumatoid sera illustrate an important difference. Guanine ab­ sorption by itself leaves behind reactivities for all adenine con­ tain ing compounds. However, when absorption with thymine is added to that of guanine, all adenino activity is removed. In contrast to this, when guanine is combined with cytosine as absorbant, a ll adenine reac­ tivity remains in the sera. This further illustrates the fact that guanine and adenine specificities are never shared by the same anti­ body molecule whereas thymine and adenine specificities appear to in­ volve a. common antibody. Since A-T is a naturally occurring base pair, it is obvious that both can function as part of the same . 68

TABLE 13.— Results of passive hemagglutination absorptions with base pairs upon rheumatoid arthritis sera

Base Pair R eactivity Removed R eactivity Remaining Absorbant

Adenine-Thymine Adenine Cytosine Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine Thyniidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate ENA DNA Adenine-Uracil Adenine Cytosine Adenine phosphate Adenosine Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonucleate RNA DNA Adenine-Cytosine Adenine Adenine phosphate Adenylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Guanylic acid 69

TABLE 13.—Continued

Base Pair R eactivity Removed R eactivity Remaining Absorbant

Cytosine Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribormcleate Sodium ribonueleate RNA DNA Guanine-Thymine Adenine Uracil Adenine phosphate .Sodium ribonueleate Adenosine Adenosine triphosphate Adenylic acid Guanylic acid Cytosine Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thy mono. « Thymidine y .J Thymidine monophosphate ■ Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate RNA DNA Guanine-Uracil Adenine phosphate Adenine Adenosine Adenine triphosphate Guanylic acid -Adenylic acid Cytosine Cytidine Cytidine monophosphate Cytidylic acid Thymine Thymidine Thyddin0 monophosphate U racil Uridine 70

TABLE 13.—Continued

Base Pair R eactivity Removed R eactivity Remaining Absorbant

Sodium deoxyri.bonucleate Sodium ribonueleate RNA DNA Guanine-Gy t o s in a Guanylic acid Adenine Cytosine Adenine phosphate Cytidine Adenosine Cytidine monophosphate Adenylic acid. Cytidylic acid Adenosine triphosphate Thymine Thymidine Thymidine monophosphate U racil Uridine Sodium deoxyribonucleate Sodium ribonueleate RNA DNA

antigenic determinant. Similarly, the fact that thymine and guanine do not absorb uracil reactivities indicates the relative lack of com­ bination of the so compounds as immunogens „ With reference to the single base, nucleoside, and nucleotide absorptions found in Table 12, it can be readily seen that the base p air absorptions remove together those re a c tiv itie s which are removed singly by each absorbing antigen. These observations and comparisons support the fa c t th a t the re a c tiv ity which is removed by an absorbing antigen is not duo to structural similarity of the bases, but rather to the fact that the absorbant is merely a portion of the major anti­ genic determinant.

In order to determine if similar relationships existed in nor­ mal human serum, the whole sera wore first titrated against ENA and 71 DNA by the passive hemagglutination technique, and none occurred. How­ ever, the nucleic acid antibodies present in the rheumatoid arthritis sera are readily detected by passive hemagglutination. Even after ammonium sulfate precipitation of tho normal serum globulins and sub™ sequent concentration of the gamma globulin fraction, no significant hemagglutination was detected.. That normal sera contain antibodies to HA and DNA in detect­ able quantities has been shown previously by the bentonite floc­ culation technique (48, 81) and by the quantitative micro-complement fixation technique. In the next section, attempts will be made to correlate tho results of this investigation with earlier observations made with the bentonite flocculation technique. DISCUSSION

Contrary to the concept that nucleic acids possessed no anti­ genic properties, evidence lias been accumulated over the past two dec­ ades which decisively shows that these materials are highly antigenic„ Moreover, much recent evidence now points to the fact that antibody production with specificities directed toward nucleic acids and their components is very common in the normal individual as well as in the person with a pathological disorder. The concept of immunological recognition of self and not-self by competent cells cannot be consid­ ered as rigid and binding as it once was. As a result of this, current thinking must encompass more wide ranging aspects of the autoimmune response. E arlie r work used the methods of complement fix atio n and pre­ c ip ita tio n to d etect antibodies directed toward subcellular components and the nucleic acids. However, at that time, the finite antigenic specificities of these antibodies were not and could not be determined. The use of immunofluorescence'. helped to establish the DNA specificity of tho LE factor present certain lupus erythematosis sera, but the actual molecular specificity could not be determined by this method. The reports concerning work, done with the antigenicity of DNA is voluminous when compared with th a t of ENA. Perhaps, one of the reasons for this is tho relatively homogeneous nature of DNA since it is predominantly nuclear to origin. The species of RNA, however, show

72 a very marked heterogeneity of types, two of nuclear origin and two of cytoplasmic origin* Nucleolar and messenger RNA species differ from transfer and ribosomal RNA to such an extent that naturally occurring immunisations can occur with the resulting antibodies having specific­ ities directed toward all the RNA types and exliibitingv ea r y hetero­ geneous nucleotide specificity* Antibodies to RNA have been detected in the sera of animals with experimentally induced autoimmune disease following the injection of autologous ribosomes (15» 25, 26), In a sim ilar manner, anti-RNA antibodies have been found in the sera of germ-free animals (57)* As a logical consequence of these obser­ vations, the identification of similarly occurring antibodies in the sera of patients with clinically diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis and in the sera of normal individuals was undertaken using the bentonite flocculation technique (48), It is here that sensitive, specific, and repeatable techniques must be used to determine more fully the speci­ f ic ity of these antibodies, both in the normal in d iv id u al's serum and in the sera of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. In order to achieve this end, the quantitative micro-complement fixation technique of Wasserman and Levine (92) and tho passive hemagglutination tech­ nique as used by Bigley and Dodd (15) were employed. Five sera from normal, healthy adults wore used to study the antibody specificity of anti-nucleic acid antibodies by the quanti­ tative micro-complement fixation method. This technique allows the detection of percentage differences in inhibitory capacity of various hapten inhibitors. The fact that peak inhibitions occurred at less than the maximal concentration of 16 ug per ml in tho cases of guanine, uracil, cytosine, uridine, cytidine, guanosine, uridylic acid, cytidylic acid, adenylic acid, adenosine triphosphate, and uridine phosphate is most probably indicative of the relative frequen­ cy with which theso compounds appear as constituents of the antigenic determinant. As is the case with RNA titrations employing different serum d ilu tio n s to find the optimal conditions fo r complement fix ­ ation, an optimal concentration of hapten inhibitor exists which causes the maximum amount of complement fix atio n in h ib itio n . These compounds, th erefo re, are apparently not present in tho major antigen­ ic determinants to the same exbent as the other compounds which in­ hibit maximally at the 16 ug per ml concentration. Moreover, it is interesting to note that the weaker inhibitors are not limited to one • class such as the purine and pyrimidine bases, but are distributed among bases, nucleosides and nucleotides. Furthermore, both purine and pyrimidine compounds are found in this group with exception of the thymine containing compounds. In general, the pyrimidine compounds are by far the more ef­ fec tiv e in h ib ito rs when compared to the purines. Among the purines, adenine and its derivatives are more active than the guanine containing compounds. I t is rath er d if f ic u lt to explain th is difference on the basis of structure since guanine has a hydroxyl group at position 6 and an amino group at position 2 while adenine only has an amino group a t position 6. However, the o verall fin a l configurational aspects of these molecules when they are processed as antigens may play a role in determining the antigenicity. 75 I f the pyrimidines are compared to the purines in a sim ilar manner, it can be seen that the pyrimidine ring is a much more highly substituted entity. The pyrinridrmes all have an oxygen molecule at the 2 position while u ra c il has an additional oxygen a t theh- position and a methyl group at the 5 position, and cytosine an amino group at the 4 position. In general these compounds are more highly substi­ tuted than are the purines and with the possible resonance forms which they may assume, a redistribution of charges and polarity may occur. This may explain tho enhanced antigenicity of the pyrimidines.

The data included in Tablesb tlirough 8 show an interesting rela tio n sh ip existing among tho compounds. In each instance, the ribonucleotides cause maximum in h ib itio n of complement fix atio n as compared to other classes containing the same base. Adenylic acid, guanylic acid, cytidylic acid, thymidylic acid,'•and uridylie acid were all tho best inhibitors. Although it is known that the bases are the prime determinants of antibody specificity, the role of ribose and ri~ bose phosphate cannot be completely ruled out. as contributors to anti­ genicity since the ribonucleotides are the best inhibitors. It can be postulated that tho size of the molecule is important in determining antibody specificity; however, from a classical point of view, the number of times a deterxiiinant group is repeated strongly enhances the a n tig en ic ity of these compounds. Considering th is , the normal cellu ­ lar breakdown which occurs in an animal and the subsequent degradation of the nucleic acids undoubtedly results in series of nucleotides which may be handled as antigens. It appears, further, since the bases alone do in h ib it complement fix a tio n , th a t there arc portions of the antibody combining site directed toward them. The conclusion which can be drawn from this is that in normal human sera the speci- "V ficity is directed primarily to the nucleotide with other specifici­ ties resulting after further breakdown to the nucleoside and base levels „ It was found previously (81) using bentonite flocculation that normal sera possessed reactivity for DMA but with titers of 8 or less in 62 per cent of the cases. Complement fixation inhibitions using DNA and sodium deoxyribonucleate as inhibitors reflect this relatively low occurrence of anti-DNA antibodies since only 8 per cent and 1? per cent inhibition occurred, respectively. The difference observed be­ tween DNA and the sodium salt of the acid can be explained on the basis of nucleotide sequence differences in the two sources. Maximum in h ib itio n w ill occur when the antibody combining s ite can combine with four or five nucleotides in sequence (86). Therefore, it appears that the source of the sodium salt of DNA has more base sequences which match the antibody combining site than does the native DNA used for inhibition.

I t is in te restin g to compare the re s u lts of the complement fixation inhibition studies of anti-RNA reactivity with those obtained by using the bentonite flocculation technique (48). Adenine, thymine, cytidylic acid, RNA, and sodium ribonueleate were all strong inhibi­ tors of bentonite flocculation while cytidine, uracil,Uridine, and adenylic acid all enhanced flocculation. This enhancement was attri­ buted to the aggregation of antigen-antibody complexes, causing a more extensive lattice of bentonite particles. Complement fixation inhibition studies demonstrated the following maximum inhibitions using the same compounds: Adenine, 42 per cent; Thymine, 58 per cent; Cytidylic acid, 82 per cent; RNA, 100 per cent; and sodium ribonucle™ ate, 75 per cent. Comparing those .inhibitors which enhanced floccu­ la tio n of bentonite p a rtic le s, the complement fix atio n method produced the following maximum percentages: Cytidine, 42 per cent; Uracil, 78 per cent; Uridine, 91 per cent; and Adenylic acid, 80 per cent. In most cases, inhibition of bentonite flocculation closely paralled the in h ib itio n obtained using complement fix atio n in h ib itio n . Those in ­ hibitors causing flocculation enhancement, for the most part, also caused a re la tiv e ly high in h ib itio n of complement fix atio n . These data confirm the previously advocated hypothesis (48) for explaining enhanced bentonite flocculation and indicate that flocculation en­ hancement is a manifestation of stronger hapten inhibition by these substances as opposed to those haptens which inhibited flocculation, but did not enhance it. Rheumatoid arthritis serum pools were found to be anticomple- mentary at all dilutions and with aid. concentrations of RNA used as the antigen. Although the anticomplementary factor(s) could be di­ luted out, anti-RNA a c tiv ity was simultaneously removed. In an a t­ tempt to discover tho nature of this factor, Sephadex gel filtrations were performed. The fact that both separated globulin fractions were anticomplementary indicated that this factor was evenly distributed, between the 19S and ?S fractions. Furthermore, analyses in the Uvi~ cord analyzer and accompanying recorder failed to show the presence of any complex which was eluted before the 19S fra c tio n , obviously 78

indicating th a t no insoluble complexes which non-specifically bound complement were present in the rheumatoid sera. In order to determine if smaller complexes existed in the whole sera, electrophoresis of the rheumatoid pools was performed upon fifteen rheumatoid sera and the normal sera. Although rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosis patients are said to display a hypergammaglobulinemia (21), not all of the samples which were examined demonstrated th is phenomenon. One pool actually exhibited hypogammaglobulinemia. It is quite possible th a t gamma globulins specific for tissu es and tissu e components are combining with their antigens and thereby are being actively phagocy­ tic ed by the nodular arrangements of lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes which have been shown to be associated with the synovial membranes and joint structures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In contrast to this, the three instances of marked, hypergammaglobulin­ emia could be caused by a complete loss of control of antibody syn­ th e s is . Since rheumatoid a r th r itis is an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies are produced presumably because of a loss of tolerance, an uncontrollable synthesis of gamma globulins to many different anti­ gens could occur.

. Similarly, the beta globulin.fraction demonstrated a wide range of percentage concentration. Eight samples contained less beta globulin than the average concentration found in normal sera while the remaining 7 showed slightly elevated levels. These differences in the beta globulin composition of rheumatoid serum might be correlated with tho levels of the B-^q and globulins which are the C * 3 and C1^ 79 components of complements respectively* Rheumatoid a r th r itis is one of several diseases with immunological abnormalities in which normal or elevated complement t it e r s are usually found (23)* Although th is would explain the rise in the beta globulin fractions it does not di­ rectly explain a decrease in this fraction* However, there are three possibilities existing which can account for this observation* First, the circulating antigen-antibody complexes or tissue antigen-antibody complexes might fix complement and thereby lower the amount of the beta globulins found in the serum.through in vivo complement fixation* It must be pointed out, however, that not all antigen-antibody inter­ actions w ill fix complement. Therefore, a reduction in complement levels (and beta globulins) may be related to such mechanisms as de­ creased production, increased catabolism, or even inhibition of com­ plement reactivity by autoantibodies directed toward complement* L astly, a deposition of one component in a tissu e could w ell be non­ specific and result in a preferential decrease of only that compo­ nent in the serum. Perhaps the most striking difference between rheumatoid arth­ ritis sera and normal sera is the elevated alpha globulin fraction* While normal sera showed an 11 to 12 per cent average, the range in rheumatoid arthritis sera extended from 12.5 to23*6 per cent. Seibert, Pfaff, and Seibert (7-1) have shown that the alpha globulin fraction is elevated in disease processes which involve tissue de­ struction and reported that an increase of alpha-2 globulin occurs far more frequently than a rise in gamma globulin* This is definitely the case in tho rheumatoid arthritis sera since there were only three 80 instances of a marked increase in gamma globulin while all rheumatoid arthritis sera demonstrated an increased alpha globulin fraction. The circulating antigen-antibody complexes and the tissue an­ tigen-antibody complexes mentioned previously may be responsible for the production of immunoconglutinin or antibody to complement. Im~ munoconglutinin is currently considered to be an autoantibody directed against complement which has been altered as a result of participation in an immune reaction (14). The specificity of this autoantibody has been identified by Bienenstock and Block (14) as the AgAbC’l^J-.ka^ stage of re a c tiv ity . I t has recently been shown th a t iwmunoconglu- tinin is specifically directed toward an antigenic determinant present in Cs3 even though C!4 has some immunogenic properties (14). C'3 is much more available in the .complement fixation reaction than is C*4; therefore, the B globulin is probably more antigenic than the B1r, jL v Xl.li globulin. The most probably mechanism fo r the production of a n ti­ bodies to complement involve immuno complexes. In the f i r s t proposed mechanism, C’3 is a ltere d a fte r i t combines with an antigen-antibody complex. The whole complex AgAbC'l,4,2a,3 then is recognized as for­ eign to the host with the resulting antibodies bearing specificity di­ rected toward the altered C*3 component. As opposed to this systemic view, complement may be inactivated lo cally by immune aggregates or by utilization during phagocytosis. This second mechanism may be opera­ tive in rheumatoid arthritis since cytoplasmic inclusions of gamma globulin aggregates have been found to exist in the polymorphonuclear leukocytes of the synovial fluid at the site of inflammation. A pos­ sibility exists that these gamma globulins are being actively 8 1 phagocytised, causing the release of lysosomal enzymes and subsequent destruction of the cells. Thus, tho immune aggregates plus the com­ plement complex involved in phagocytosis are released to the immuno­ logic machinery. I t is in terestin g to note th a t the same complement complex, AgAbCtl,^,2a,3 is the one which is responsible for enhancing phagocytosis as w ell as determining the sp e c ific ity of immunoconglu- tinin. It is most probable that the local activation of complement is the more important mechanism in rheumatoid a rth r itis because of the collections of lymphoid tissues and the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes at the site of inflammation. Since Sephadex gel filtration did not reveal any large insol­ uble aggregates being eluted before tho 19S globulin fraction and since no complexes were found to remain at the point of application of the serum in electrophoresis, the conclusion is that the immunoconglutinin is the anticomplementary factor. Consequently-, dilution of the serum would remove the anticomplementary re a c tiv ity as w ell as the anti-RNA reactivity. It appears logical that the quantitative micro-complement fix atio n te s t could be modified to overcome the immunoconglutinin re­ a c tiv ity , but a sa c rific e of se n sitiv ity of the complement fix atio n technique would be inevitable.

It becomes imperative here to mention the sensitivity of the serological procedures used to determine antibody reactivity and spec­ i f ic it y . ICwapinski (46) summarized the se n s itiv itie s of various classes of serological test methods. Flocculation requires a minimum of 0.2 ug of antibody N for this reaction to be visible. Similarly, complement fix atio n requires 0.05 ug of antibody N while passive hemagglutination and passive hemagglutination-inhibition only require 0.001 ug for detection. It appears, therefore, that passive hemag­ glutination and passive hemagglutination-inhibition are the most sens­ itiv e techniques available to study anti-RNA antibody re a c tiv ity . In order to avoid the anticomplementary nature of the rheuma­ toid arthritis sera, passive hemagglutinations using antigens coupled to erythrocytes with bis-diasotized benzidine were employed. When each of the sera were titrated against the nucleotides, nucleosides, and bases, there were noticeablo differences in reactivity. Similar to complement fix atio n in h ib itio n , the extent of re a c tiv ity of these compounds is indicative of their presence in the antigenic determi­ nants. From these data, an order of antigenicity can be stated. It can be seen that adenine, adenine phosphate, and adenosine are the strongest reacting purine antigens while cytosine and uracil are the best pyrimidine antigens. The specificities for adenine containing compounds never oc­ curred in combination with cytosine specificities. The converse of this statement is true, however, only in the case of cytosine itself, since other serologic specificities of the cyiosino containing com­ pounds often occurred in association with those of adenine deriva­ tives. From these data, it is evident that all reactivities removed by an absorbing antigen reflects an association in the antigenic deter­ minant of the absorbant plus those compounds whose reactivities were removed. I t cannot be assumed th a t a l l the re a c tiv ity removed is due to antibody molecules of a single specificity but to at least a het­ erogeneous population of antibody molecules exhibiting tip to four or five different specificities. However, the passive hemagglutination absorption technique demonstrated, at least two different antigenic specificities: the absorbing antigen specificity and that of the com­ pounds whose re a c tiv ity was removed. Furthermore, an add itio nal prop­ erty of these antisera can be seen. The serologic reactivity which remained after absorption indicated a complete lack of association of the absorbant and the reactive compound in the antigenic determinant. This procedure appears to be the first step in determining the actual antigenic determinant th a t serves as autoimmunogen in rheumatoid arth ­ ritis patients. It is evident that rheumatoid arthritis sera demonstrates two prime specificities, adenine and cytosine, which apparently never oc­ cur' in the same antigenic determinant. An adenine and cytidylic acid specificity in rheumatoid sera was previously indicated using the ben­ tonite flocculation reaction. Similarly, cytidylic acid used as ab­ sorbant in the passive hemagglutination absorption technique removed a l l re a c tiv ity except th a t for some adenine compounds, thymine and uracil. However, because of the limits of sensitivity in the de­ tection of flocculating antibody, further comparisons are meaningless. From the previous absorption data, the adenine-cytosine (A-C) base pair was predicted to remove all reactivity. Since this combination does not normally occur, all possible combinations of purine and pyr­ imidine bases wore also examined for absorptive capacity. All the combinations remove those reactivities which each member of the com­ bination absorbed alone. The adenine-cytosine (A-C) combination 84- 9 removed all serological reactivity from all sera for each of the other antigens. Although there is no direct experimental evidence, it is tempting to hypothesise that transfer RNA (tKMA) is the immunogen to which the anti-RNA antibodies are directed. All tRNA molecules have the terminal trinucleotide sequence adenine-cytosine-cytosine (A-C-C) in common. This fact together with the observation that adenine and cytosine base p air absorptions removed a l l serological re a c tiv ity for other test antigens implicates tRNA as a possible immunogen.

As a m atter of speculation, i t appears reasonable to assume that in the accelerated cellular breakdown in tissues associated with rheumatoid arthritis lesions, nucleic acid degradation results in a combination of adenine or cytosine and other nucleotide breakdown products such as the A-C-C sequence mentioned above with a carrier substance, possibly with protein, and thus acts as autoimaunogens. In addition, adenine could combine during degradation with cytosine forming a base pair which does not occur naturally. This combination and all the other unnatural combinations resulting from nucleotide breakdown products would then be recognized as foreign and antibodies would be made to them. Although it appears that adenine and cytosine never appear together in an antigenic determinant, it is possible that antibodies do exist which contain specificities directed toward both bases. In th is case, re a c tiv ity fo r the combination would be removed by either adenine or cytosine, leaving only the antibody which con­ tained combining sites reactive only with the non-absorbing base. 85 A complete loss of tolerance to one's own tissues or an anti­ genic m odification of the tissu e s and th e ir components must be assumed as the triggering event in the initiation of auto immunity,, It appears that the former hypothesis is not as strong as the latter since normal healthy adults possess antibodies reactive with both DNA and RNA. These normal antibodies possibly help in the normal physiological clearing mechanisms of the body. In the case of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and other diseases involving accelerated cellular desti'uction, the immunological system must react to the in­ creased amount of c e llu la r debris. This degradation process undoubt­ edly contains complexes which would never be found under normal con­ ditions, As a result, they are recognized as foreign, processed as antigens, followed by specific antibody being synthesized. It is also of interest to note the serologic reactivity of nucleosides, nucleotides, and bases. Absorption and titration data indicate that antigenicity is not limited to tho nucleotides alone. A ll nucleic acid subunits are antigenic showing th a t the degree of degradation is important in ultimately determining the antibody com­ bining site. When a cell is destroyed either naturally or by a patho­ logic process, not only nucleotides but also all other derivatives can become complexed with carrier substances and act as antigens. Where nucleic acids are concerned, the specificities found in an antibody molecule appear to be random. For instance, it might be directed toward an actual sequence of RNA or DNA nucleotides, or it might be directed toward a random.'mixture of bases, nucleosides, and nucleo­ tides which have been presented to the immunological machinery as an 86 intimate complex associated with a carrier. At this point* it is in>- possible to state which situation predominates in sera from patients with rheumatoid arthritis, but data indicates that with the increased cellular breakdown and perhaps increased enzymatic activity related to the lysosomal enzymes,, the second possibility is stronger than the f i r s t . SUMMARY

(1) The pyrimidine bases cytosine, thymine, and uracil were found to be much more effectiv e as in h ib ito rs of normal human serum comple­ ment fixation with RNA than were the purine bases adenine and guanine. The pyrimidine ribonucleotides were more inhibitory than were the pur­ ine ribonucleotides , In general, all the nucleotides were more inhibi­ to ry than any other class of nucleic acid components in normal human serum complement fix atio n in h ib itio n studies.

(2) The 'occurrence of anti-RNA antibodies in normal human serum is noted much more frequently than anti~DNA antibodies as is shown by tho relative inefficiency of DNA and sodium deoxyribonucleate as inhibitors in the complement fix atio n in h ib itio n te s t. Furthermore, the deoxy- counterparts of the ribonucleotides and rxbonucleosides showed no in­ creased or decreased effectiveness as inhibitors over the ribonucleo­ tides and ribonucleosidos.

(3) Immunoconglutinbn appeared in significant titers and is con­ sidered to be the anticomplementary factor which renders the comple­ ment fixation test ineffective for the study of nucleic acid antibody specificity in the sera of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.

(^) Tho relative antigenicity of the purinos adenine, adenine phosphate, and adenosine as well as of the pyrimidines cytosine,

8? 88 thymidine monophosphate, uracil, and uridine is significant when com­ pared to the reactivities of other nucleic acid components. Not only were nucleic acids and their nucleotide subunits shown to be antigen­ ic, but also all compounds which are the result of nucleic acid degra­ dation processes are shown to possess antigenic properties. In gen­ eral, the pyrimidines were found to bo more antigenic than the

purines.

(5) The passive hemagglutination absorption technique demonstrated two prime antibody specificities in rheumatoid arthritis sera, one di­ rected toward the purine adenine and the second directed toward the pyrimidine cytosine. Furthermore, passive hemagglutination .absorption using both naturally occurring and unnatural pur ine-pyrimidine base pairs showed' complete removal of all serologic reactivity from the sera which were absorbed with the adenine-eytosino complex. Other base pair combinations removed together those reactivities which each base removed when used as a single absorbant.

(6) The absorption technique showed through the removal of sero­ logic reactivity at least two constituents of the antigenic deter­ minants which have been postulated to be made up of four or five com­ ponents. In addition, i t also demonstrates those components which were not found in association with the absorbing antigen. Lastly, further emphasis was placed upon the fact that all nucleic acid sub­ units (nucleotides, nucleosides, and bases) are equal as immunogens. LITERATURE CITED

Asherson, G. L. "Antibodies against nuclear and cytoplasmic cell constituents in systemic lupus erythematosis and other diseases." Brit. J. Exptl. Pathol. 40:209. 1959.

Astorga, G., and B ollet, A. J. "Diagnostic specificity and pos­ sible pathogenic significance of inclusion-body cells in synovial fluid," Arth. Rheum. _7:288. 1964. Barbu, E., and Panijel, J. Cited by Bigley. Compt. Rend. Ac. Sc. 250:1382. I960. Barbu, E., and Panijel, J. Cited by Bigley. Compt. Rend. Ac. Sc. jL50:3157. 1961. Barbu, E», and Dandeau, J. P. "The presence of antibodies against ribonucleic acid in the sera of humans and non- imraunized anim als." Compt. Rend. Ac. Sc. 256:29*1-8. 1963« B arnett, E. V„, Condemd., J. J ., Leddy, J. P ., and Vaughan, J. H. "73, B2A, and 193 antinuclear factors in human sera." Arth. Rheum. 6:261. 1963• B arnett, E. V., Bakemeier, R. F ., Leddy, J . P ., and Vaughan, J. H. "Heterogeneity of antinuclear factors in lupus erythema tosis and rheumatoid arthritis." Arth. Rheum. 7:250. 1964. B arnett, E. V., Condemi, J. J ., Leddy, J. P ., and Vaughan, J. H. "7S, and 3.9S anti-nuclear factors in human sera." J. Clin. Inv. 43:1104. 1964. B arnett, E. V., Bakemeier, R. F ., Leddy, J . P ., and Vaughan, J. H. "Heterogeneity of antinuclear factors in lupus erythernatosis and rheumatoid arthritis." Proc. Soc, Exptl. Biol. Med. 118:803. 1965. ~ B arnett, E. V., and Vaughan, J. H, "Auitinuclear antibodies in rabbit sera." J. Exptl. Med. 123:733. 19o6 Barnett, E. V., Bienenstock, J., and Block, K. J. "Antinuclear facto rs in synovia: Possible p articip an ts in the rheuma­ toid inclusion body." J. Am. Med, Ass. 3.98:143. 3.966, 90

12. Beck, J. S ., Anderson, J. R., Block, K, J . , Buchanan, W. W., and Brenem, J. J. "Antinuclear and precipitating autoantibodies in Sjorgren's Syndrom©." Ann♦-Rheum, P is. 2A:16, 1965* 13. Beiser, S. M., and Erlanger, B. F. "Antibodies which react with nucleic acids." Can. Res. 26:2012, 1966. 1^. Bienenstock, J., and Block, K. J. "Immunocongluiinin in various rheumatic diseases and certain diseases suspected of an autoimmune pathogenesis." Arth, Rheum. 10:18?. 196?. 15. Bigley, N. J ., Dodd, M. C ,, and Geyer, V. B. "The immunologic specificity of antibodies to liver ribosomes and nuclei." J. Immuno].. 90:^16. 1963» 16. Bozieevich, J ., Nasou, J. P ., and Kayhoe, D, E. "Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA.)—bentonite flocculation test for lupus erythema- tosis]' Proc. Soc, Exptl, Biol. Med. 103:636. I960. 17. Butler, V. P., Beiser, S. M., Erlanger, B. F., Tanenbaum, S. W., Cohen, S., and Benedict, A. "Purine specific antibodies which react with deoxyribonucleic acid," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 48:1597. 1962. 18. Butler, V. P., Tanenbaum, S. W., Beiser, S. M. "A study of the cr o s s ~ r e activity of antipurin~6~oyl serum with DNA." J. Exptl. Med. 121:19. 1965. 19. Castando, J. P., White, J. G„, and Williams, R. C. "Antinuclear antibodies in normal human subjects." Arth. Rheum. 10:^31. 1967. 20. Ceppilini, R., Polli, E., and Celada, F, "A DNA-reacting factor in serum of a patient with lupus erythema tosis diffusus." Proc. Soc, Exptl. Biol. Med. 96:572. 1957. 21. Christians, 0. L. "Rheumatoid Arthritis," an Immunological Diseases, ed. by Max Samter (Boston: L ittle, Brown and Company, 1965). 22. Collins, R. C. "Further experimental studies on sympathetic ophthalmia." Am. J. Ophth. 36:150. 3-953. 23. Cooper, N. R., and Fogel, B. J. "Complement in normal and disease processes." J. Ped. 70:932. I967. 2A, Deicher, H.t Holman, H., and Kunkel, H. G. "Anticytoplasraic factors on the sera of patients with systemic lupus erythem- atosis and certain other diseases." Arth. Rheum,'3:1. 960 i . 9 1 25. Dodd, M. Co, Bigley, N. J ., Geyor, V. B., McCoy, F. W., and Wil­ son, H. E„ "Autoimmune response in rabbits injected with rat and rabbit liver ribosomes." Science 137:688. 1962. 26. Dodd, M. C. "Experimental Models in SLE„" Immunologic Aspects of Rheumatoid A rth ritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosis. New York: Grune and S tratto n , pp. 501-512. 1963. 27. Duran-Reynals, F. "The flocculation of tissue extracts by normal and immune sera of fowl and of other animals." Yale J. Biol. Med. 12:361. 1939-19^0. 28. Erlanger, B. F., and Beiser, S. M. "Antibodies specific for ribonucleosidos and ribonucleotides and their reaction with DNA." Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 52:68. 1964. 29. Feldbush, T. L. Doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State Univer­ sity. 1966. 30. Friou, G. J,, Finch, S. C,, and Dotre, K. D. "Interaction of nuclei and globulin from lupus erythematosis serum demon­ strated with fluorescent antibody," J. Immunol. 80:324. 1958. 3'i. Friou, G. J. "Identification of the nuclear component at the interaction of lupus erythematosis globulin and nuclei." J . Immunol. 80:476. 1958. 32. Friou, G. J. "Antinuclear antibodi.es: diagnostic significance and methods," Arth. Rheum. 10:151. 1967. 33. Gajdusek, D. C. "An autoimmune reaction against human tissu e antigens in certain chronic diseases." Nature 179:666. 1957. 3*h Gajdusek, D. C. "An autoimmune reaction against human tissu e antigens in certain acute and chronic diseases." AMA Arch. Int. Med. 101:9. 1958 35« Gelman Instrument Company, Rapid Electrophoresis Manual 70176-B. Gelman Instrument Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 1966

36. Gordon, J„, Rose, B., and Sehon, A. H. "Detection ox nonprecipi­ tating antibodies in sera of individuals allergic to ragweed pollen by an in vitro method." J. Exptl. Mod. 108:37. 1958. 37. Halbert, S. P., Locatcher-Khorazio, D., Swish, L., Witner, R,, Siegal, B., and Fitzgerald, P. "Homologous immunological studies'of ocular lens. I. In vitro observations." J. Exptl. Med. 105:439. 1957. 92

38. Halloran, M. J., and Parker, C. W. "The preparation of nucleotide-protein conjugates: Carbodiimides as coupling agents," J. Immunol. 96:373. 1966, 39. Halloran, M. J., and Parker, C. W. "The production of antibodies to mononucleotides, oligonucleotides and DNA," J, Immunol» 96:379. 1966, 80. Hargraves, M. M., Richmond, H„, and Morton, R. "Presentation of two bone marrow elements: the ’tart cell* and the *LE cell’." Proc, Mayo Clinic 23:25. 1988. 81. Haserick, J. R«, Lewis, L. A., and Barta, 0. W. "Blood factors in acute disseminated lupus erythematosis. I. Determi™ nation of gamma globulin as specific plasma fraction." Am, J. Med. Sol. 219:660. 1950. 82. Hollander, J. L,, Rawson, A. J., Restifo, R. A., and Lusier, A. J. "Studies on the pathogenesis of rheumtoid joint in- flamination." Arth. Rheum. 7=318. 1968. 43, Holman, II. R., and Kunke3., II. A. "Affinity between the lupus ery­ thematosis serum factor and cell nuclei and nucleoprotein." Science 126:162, 1957. 88. Karol, M. H., and Tannenbaum, S. VI. "Antibodies to hapten- conjugated proteins which cross react with RNA." Proc. Hat. Acad. Sol. USA. 52:713. 1967. 85. Kidd, J. G., and Friedewald, VI. F. "A natural antibody that re­ acts in vitro with a sedimentable constituent of normal tis­ sue 'c ells." J, Exptl. Med. 76:5-13. 1982. 86. Kwapinski, J. B. Methods of Serological Research. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 1965. p. 3.26. 8?. Lacour, F., Harel, J., and Harel, L. Cited by Sola and Ungar- Waron. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 52:285. 3-968.

88. Larkin, G. F. Master’s thesis. The Ohio State University. 1965.

89. Lawlis, J. F. "Serologic detection of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) adsorbed to formalinized erythrocytes." Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol, and Med. 98:300. '1958. 50. Levi, M„ I„, and Poverenny, A. M. "Use of the passive hemagglu­ tination reaction for determining antibodies against deoxy­ ribonucleic acid (DNA)." J. Hyg. Epidemiol.. Microbiol. Immunol. 9:865. 3.965. 93 51. Levine, L ., Murakami, W. T .f Van Vunakis, H., and Grossman, L. "Specific antibodies to thermally denatured deoxyribonucleic- acid of phage T4-." Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 46:1038. I960. 52. Mackay, R ., and Gajdusek, D. C. "An autoimmune reaction against human tissue antigens in certain acute and chronic diseases. II. Clinical correlations" AM Arch. Int. Med. 101:35« 1958. 53. Murakami, ¥. T., Van Vunakis, H., Lebrer, H» I., and Levine, L„ "Immunochemical studies on bacteriophage DNA. I I I 0 Speci­ f ic ity of the antibody." J. Immunol. 89:116. 1962.

54-0 Muschel, L. H., Simonton, L„ A., Wells, P. A., and Fife, E. H. "Occurrence of complement-fixing antibody reactive with nor­ mal tissue constituents in normal and disease states.'.1 J . Clin. Inv. 40:517. 1961. 55. Old, L. J ., and Boyce, E. A.. "Antigenic properties of chemically induced tumors." Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 101:80. 1962. 56. Panijel, J., Barbu, E., and Quash, G, "Immune tolerance and autologous constituents." Internation Colloquium of tho National Center of Scientific Research 116:30?. 1963. 57. Panijel, J., Cayeux, P., Sacquet, E., and Charlier, H. "Anti- ribonucleic acid factors in the sera of germ-free animals." Nature 211:94-. 1966. 58. Panijel, J., Souliol, C., and Cayoux, P. "Immunochemistry of polyribonucleotides. I. Homopolymers of one or several chains." Blochem et Biophys Acta 123:221. 1966. 59. P an ijel, J ., S ouliel, C„, and Cayeux, P. "Imunochemistry of polyribonucleotides. II. Complexes of homopolymers." Biochem et Biophys Acta 12.3:235. 1966. 60. Phillips, J. H., Braun, W., and Plescia, 0. "Antigenicity of a bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid." Nature 181:573. 1958. 61. Pie scia, 0. J,, Braun, V/., and Palczuk, N. C. In Conceptual Ad­ vances in I mmunology and Oncology. New York: Harper, 1962. p. 238. “ 62. Plescia, 0. J., Palczuk, N. C., Cora-Figueroa, E., Mukerjee, A’i, and Braun, W. "Production of antibodies to soluble RNA." Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 54;1281. 1965. 94

63. Plescia, 0. J., Palczuk, N. C., Braun, W., and Cora-Figueroa, E. "Antibodies to DM and a specific polydeoxyribonucleate pro­ duced by .11 Science 148:1102. 1965. 64. Plescia, 0. J., Palczuk, N. C., Mukerjee, A., and Cora-Figueroa, E„ "Production of antibodies to tRNA." Fed. Proc. 24:185. 1965. ' 65. Plescia, 0. J., and Braun, W. "Nucleic acids as antigens." Adv. Immunol. 64231. 1967. 66. Poverenny, A. M., and Levi, M. I. "The existence of two types of antibodies for DNA." Vop. Med. Khlm. 11:95» 1965.

67. Poverenny, A. M., Saienko, A. S., and Kreier, V. G. "Interaction of protein (antibodies) with the deoxyribonucleic acid mole- culo." Nature 211:1297. 1966. 68. Bobbins, W. C.t Holman, H. R., Beicher, H., and Kunkel, H. A. "Complement fixation with cell nuclei and DNA in lupus ery­ thema tosi s." Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 96:575. 1957.

69. Rose, N. R,, and Witebsky, E. "Studies on organ specificity. V. Changes in the thyroid glands of rabbits following active immunization with rab b it thyroid ex tracts." J. Immunol. 76:417. 1956. . . 70. Rosenkrantz, H. S., Erlarger, B. F», Taunenbaum, S. W., and Beiser, S. M. "Purine and pyrimidine specific. antibodies: Effects on fertilized sea urchin eggs." Science 145:282. 1964. 71. Sandberg, Ann L., and Stollar, B. D. "Comparisons of antibodies reacting with DNA. I. Systemic lupus erythematosis sera and rabbit antibodies induced by DNA-r.iethy3.ated bovine serum albumin complexes." J. Immunol. 96:755. 1966. 72. Sandberg, A. L., and Stollar, B. D. "Comparison of antibodies reacting with DNA. II. Rabbit antibodies induced by nucleoside-protein conjugates." J. Immunol. 96:764. 1966. 73. Sandor, G., Korache, S., and Matterin, P. "7S globulin immuno- logically identical to 19S gamma-l(be'ta-2)-M-globulin, a new protein of horse serum." Nature■204:795. 1964. 74. Schur, P. H., Moroz, L. A., and Kunkel, H. G. "Precipitating antibodies to ribosomes in the serum of patients with sys­ temic lupus erythem atosis" Immunochemistry 4:44-7. 1957. 95 75. Seaman, E ., Levine, L ., and Van Vunakis, H. "Iramunochemical studies on bacteriophage deoxyribonucleic acid. V. Speci­ ficity of antibodies to DNA after smmunization with MESA- DNA complexes." ^:2091. 1965. 76. Seaman, E ., Van Vunakis, H.» and Levine, L. "A ntigenicity of polyribonucleotides." Biochemistry 4;1312. 965 I '. 77. Seibert, F. B.s Pfaff, M. L., and Seibert, M. V. "A serum poly­ saccharide in tuberculosis and carcinoma." Arch Biochem 18: 279. 19^8. 78. Seligman, M. "DNA antibodies in lupus erythematosis." Rev. Etudes. Clin. Biol. 2:558. 3-958. 79. Seligman, M. "DNA antibodies." Arth. Rheum. 6:5^2. 1963. 80. Seligman, M. "The antinuc3.ear antibodies of systemic lupus ery­ thema to s is ." J. B rasil. Med. 9:763.. 1965. 81. Scheeta, M. E. Master's thesis. The Ohio State University. 1965. 82. Sela, M., Ungcr-Waron, H., Schecter, Y. "Uridine specific a n ti­ bodies with synthetic antigens." Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US/u ^2:285. 196'1. 83. Sela, M., and Ungar-Waron, H. "Nucleoside specific antibodies elicited by synthetic antigens." Fed. Proc. 2^: lh-38. 965 I . 8^. Shulman, S ., and Witebsky, E„ "Studies on organ sp e c ific ity . IX. Biophysical and immunochemical studies on human thyroid autoantibody." J. Immunol. 85:559. 19o0„

85. Steward, S. E.f Eddy, B. E., Gochenouer, A. M., Bogese, N. G., and Grubs, G. E. "The induction of neoplasms with a sub­ stance released from mouse tumors by tissue culture." Virology 2:380. 1957. 86. Stollar, De, Levine, L., Lehror, H. I., and Van Vunakis, H. "The antigenic determinants of denatured DNA reactive with lupus erythematosis serum." Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 48:8?R. 1962.

87. Sturgill, B. C., and Carpenter. R. R. "Antibodies to ribosomes in systemic lupus erythematosis." Arth. Rheum. 8:213. 1965. 88. Sturgill, B. C. and Preble, M. R. "Antibody to ribosomes in sys­ temic 3.upus erythematosis: Demonstration by immunofluores­ cence and precipitation in agar." Arth. Rheum. ,10:538. 1967. 96

89. Tan, E. M., Schur, P. H., Carr, R. I . , and Kunkel, H. G. "Deoxy­ ribonucleic acid (DNA) in the serum'of patients with system­ ic lupus erythem atosis," J, Clin, Inv. 1.5:1732. 1966. 90. Tan, E. M, "An itnraunologic p rec ip itin system between soluble nucleoprotein and serum antibody in systemic lupus erythema- tosis. J. Clin. Inv, 16:735. 1967. 91. Thivolet, I., Monier, J. C., Ruel, J. P., and Richard, M. H. "Antinuclear autoantibodies in swiss mice thymectomized at birth." Nature 211:113-1. 196?. 92. Wasserman, E., and Levine, L. "Q uantitative micro-complement fixation and its use in the study of antigenic structure by specific antigen-antibody inhibition." J. Immunol. 87:290. 1961. 93. Wastsend, E. E ., Van Vunakis, H., and Levine, L. "Immunochemical studies on bacteriophage deoxyribonucleic acid. IV. Hapten inhibitions." Biochemistry 1:913. 1965. 91. Wells, H. G. The Chemical Aspects of Immunity. New York: The Chemical Catalog Company, Inc. p. 12. 1929 95. Wiederman, G., Vainia, I . , and Heischer, P. "Anticytoplasmic antibodies in patients with .systemic lupus erythematosis and infectious hepatitis." Arth. Rheum. 6:305. 96. Witebsky, E. Cited by Raffel. Immunity. Edition 2. Appleton- Century-Crofts» Inc. New York. p. 537. 1961. 97. Witebsky, E., and Rose, N. R, "Studies on organ specificity. IV. Production of rabbit thyroid antibodies in the rabbit." J. Immunol. 2,6:108. 1956. 98. Witebsky, E„, Rose, N. R., and Nadel, H. "Studies on organ speci­ ficity. X. The serologic specificity of pancreas ex­ tra c ts ." J , Immunol. 85:568. I960.

99. Yurko, L. E. Master's thesis. The Ohio State University. 1966.