DOCSLIB.ORG

Market Digest – March 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Market Digest – March 2020 Market Digest – March 2020 Positioning in a bear market Table of contents Executive Summary 2 Global Allocation 3-5 U.S. Stock Market 6-8 U.S. Sectors 9-10 Energy 11-12 Global Economics 13-15 U.S. Fixed Income 16-20 U.S. Economics 21-23 Ned’s Insights 24 AMY LUBAS, CFA, DIRECTOR, WEALTH Glossary of Terms 25-26 MANAGEMENT & ADVISORY SOLUTIONS House Views 27 CHAD ELLIS, RESEARCH ANALYST MARKET DIGEST SUMMARY AMY LUBAS, CFA DIRECTOR, WEALTH MANAGEMENT & ADVISORY SOLUTIONS CHAD ELLIS RESEARCH ANALYST MARCH 16, 2020 Executive Summary De-risked across the board How the current cyclical bear compares to previous bears Coronavirus (COVID-19) continues to domi- A History of Bear Markets II: Dow Jones Industrial Average (1900-Present) nate world news. Since last month’s update, the -10 Current bear 1953 Sources: S&P Dow Jones Indices 2016 virus’ rapid spread outside of China, announce- 1984 1971 1949 1980 Ned Davis Research Calculations 2011 1960 1923 ment as a pandemic, and increasing fears of an -20 20201998 1957 1990 19391934 1947 1982 1914 economic recession have rattled investors. All 1966 1962 1978 1911 -30 markets have taken a beating in March thus 2001 2002 far — we are officially in an NDR-defined bear 1987 1970 1933 -40 market. As such, we made several position 1917 1942 changes over the past couple of weeks. 1974 1921 1903 1929 -50 1938 1907 Loss % • On March 6, we de-risked in fixed 2009 income. We increased our duration -60 to 110% from 100%, as the demand for safe, long duration assets continues. In -70 Cyclical Bears Independent of Recessions light of recent market developments, we Mean for Cyclical Bears Independent of Recessions (-25.0% Loss, 200 Days) Cyclical Bears Coinciding with Recessions -80 downgraded investment grade credit, Mean for Cyclical Bears Coinciding with Recessions (-34.5% Loss, 369 Days) Mean for All Bear Markets (-30.9% Loss, 307 Days) CMBS, MBS, and ABS to underweight, Current Bear Market Days = market days 1932 joining our underweight on high-yield. 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700 725 750 775 800 Market Days Treasurys are the beneficiaries at over- S0202D © Copyright 2020 Ned Davis Research, Inc. Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. All Rights Reserved. See NDR Disclaimer at www.ndr.com/copyright.html weight. For data vendor disclaimers refer to www.ndr.com/vendorinfo/ • On March 9, we moved to a bearish view on oil. An OPEC price war occur- thrusts (without an intervening thrust to Consumer Staples to overweight ring in the midst of a global demand the downside). and Real Estate to marketweight. With shock (i.e., the coronavirus outbreak) is • On March 12, we shifted 5% from many now expecting flat to down earn- completely unprecedented. We are in stocks to bonds in re sponse to model ings growth for the S&P 500, Consumer unchartered territory. and indicator deterioration. This move Staples’ mid-single-digit earnings growth • On March 10, we went cautious on brings us more in line with our Global should look superior. We also down- U.S. stocks, which means sub-par Balanced Account Model at 50% stocks graded Industrials, Financials, and returns. The market decline has met the (now underweight), 45% bonds (more Energy to underweight. NDR criteria for a cyclical bear mar- overweight), and 5% cash (under- ket. To date, the decline is smaller than weight). We are watching for indicator Economic impact the median bear (chart above), but developments that would be consistent Whether the hit to economic activity is clas- more importantly, it is the shortest on re- with a bottoming process or continued sified as recession or not will largely depend cord. Market bottoms are a process that weakness. on its duration. Recent monetary and fiscal take time. The four steps are: 1) oversold; • On March 13, we got more defensive policy announcements are trying to mitigate 2) rally; 3) retest; and 4) positive breadth in our U.S. sector allocation. We lifted the damage. PERIODICAL | ISSUE: #MKTDG20200316 | NDR.COM Please see important disclosures at the end of this report. MARCH 16, 2020 2 MARKET DIGEST GLOBAL ALLOCATION TIM HAYES, CMT CHIEF GLOBAL INVESTMENT STRATEGIST ANOOP NATH, CFA GLOBAL ANALYST MARCH 16, 2020 Volatility has returned, stocks downgraded After spiking, VIX tends to stay high VIX around Spikes over 30 Key Takeaways 55.0 Source: Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated. www.cboe.com 55.0 Current Case (2020-02-27) 52.5 Average of All Cases* 52.5 * Based on the average of the 18 cases listed below going back to 1990. 50.0 Excludes current case. 50.0 • Shifted 5% from stocks to 47.5 47.5 bonds in response to model and 1990-08-06 2007-08-15 45.0 1997-10-27 2008-03-14 45.0 indicator deterioration. 1998-08-04 2008-09-15 42.5 1999-02-08 2009-05-21 42.5 2000-04-14 2010-05-06 40.0 2000-12-20 2011-08-04 40.0 • Now 5% underweight stocks and 2001-09-07 2015-08-24 37.5 2002-07-09 2018-02-05 37.5 10% overweight bonds at 50% 2003-01-24 2018-12-21 35.0 35.0 stocks, 45% bonds, and 5% cash 32.5 32.5 allocation. 30.0 30.0 27.5 27.5 • Watch for indicator developments 25.0 25.0 that would be consistent with a 22.5 22.5 bottoming process or continued 20.0 20.0 weakness. 17.5 17.5 15.0 15.0 12.5 12.5 Crosses above 30 for the first time in six months Just when it looked like the global stock -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Months Prior | Months Post market advance would start to broaden INF20_10A_C © Copyright 2020 Ned Davis Research, Inc. Further distribution prohibited without prior permission. All Rights Reserved. See NDR Disclaimer at www.ndr.com/copyright.html — anticipating a strengthening economic For data vendor disclaimers refer to www.ndr.com/vendorinfo/ recovery — along came the coronavirus panic to knock it back down. And just stocks (5% underweight), 45% bonds likely an oversold bounce than the start when the indicator evidence had improved (10% overweight), and 5% cash (5% of a sustained recovery. On February 27, enough to warrant an allocation shift from underweight). the VIX reached a level that has tended bonds to stocks, along came the most to be followed by a median drawdown of decisive wave of indicator deterioration This move recognizes the magnitude of -19.4% in the All-Country World Index. The since 2018. the economic hit from the coronavirus current drop has been -19.7%, with volatility response and the time that will most remaining elevated. With our current intra-month estimate likely be required for economic conditions for the Global Balanced Account Model to improve — even if global cases of Rising above its Bottom Watch parameter showing the stock allocation dropping COVID-19 follow China’s trend and start to of 43, the VIX has reached levels last to 46% and the bond allocation rising subside. seen in 2009. While there’s no way of to 50% — with the remainder in cash — knowing how high the VIX will rise, history we shifted 5% from stocks to bonds It also recognizes that the market’s attempt suggests we won’t see a return to low on March 11. This brings the allocation to stabilize and turn higher has failed volatility any time soon (chart above). more in line with the model at 50% miserably, with the March 10 rebound more PERIODICAL | ISSUE: #MKTDG20200316 | NDR.COM Please see important disclosures at the end of this report. MARCH 16, 2020 3 MARKET DIGEST GLOBAL ALLOCATION 4 | NED DAVIS RESEARCH Until volatility subsides to such an extent Rising VIX, dropping yields and equities Daily Data 2010-03-11 to 2020-03-10 that a VIX downtrend is established, stocks One-Year Correlations- ACWI, VIX & 10-Year Treasury Yield 60 S&P 500 Volatility Index (VIX) (2020-03-10 = 47.3) Source: Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated. www.cboe.com 60 should have trouble recovering, considering 50 50 the strong inverse correlation between the 40 40 30 30 VIX and the All Country World Index (ACWI) 20 20 (chart right, third clip). Given the inverse 10 10 10-Year Treasury Yield (2020-03-10 = 0.8%) correlation between the VIX and the 10-year 4.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 Treasury note yield (bottom clip), falling bond 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 yields can be expected with bouts of volatility. 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 Source: Federal Reserve Board 0.5 Source: MSCI When coronavirus worries start to subside -0.65 -0.65 and global economic activity starts returning -0.70 -0.70 to normal, we will likely see stock prices -0.75 -0.75 moving higher with rising bond yields and a -0.80 -0.80 -0.85 -0.85 falling VIX. But there’s not yet any evidence Rolling One-Year Correlation: Daily % Change of VIX & MSCI ACWI 2020-03-10 = -0.80 -0.1 -0.1 that such a recovery is at hand, hence -0.2 -0.2 our overweight allocation to bonds and -0.3 -0.3 -0.4 -0.4 underweight allocation to stocks. -0.5 -0.5 -0.6 -0.6 Rolling One-Year Correlation: Daily % Change of VIX & 10-Year Treasury Yield 2020-03-10 = -0.42 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 As long as stock volatility remains elevated, Data Range (Years): 1 2 5 10 Max high bond volatility can be expected to I87_CORR © Copyright 2020 Ned Davis Research, Inc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    INDEX Page numbers followed by n indicate note numbers. A Arnott, Robert, 391 Ascending triangle pattern, 140–141 AB model. See Abreu-Brunnermeier model Asks (offers), 8 Abreu-Brunnermeier (AB) model, 481–482 Aspray, Thomas, 223 Absolute breadth index, 327–328 ATM. See Automated teller machine Absolute difference, 327–328 ATR. See Average trading range; Average Accelerated trend lines, 65–66 true range Acceleration factor, 88, 89 At-the-money, 418 Accumulation, 213 Average range, 79–80 ACD method, 186 Average trading range (ATR), 113 Achelis, Steven B., 214n1 Average true range (ATR), 79–80 Active month, 401 Ayers-Hughes double negative divergence AD. See Chaikin Accumulation Distribution analysis, 11 Adaptive markets hypothesis, 12, 503 Ayres, Leonard P. (Colonel), 319–320 implications of, 504 ADRs. See American depository receipts ADSs. See American depository shares B 631 Advance, 316 Bachelier, Louis, 493 Advance-decline methods Bailout, 159 advance-decline line moving average, 322 Baltic Dry Index (BDI), 386 one-day change in, 322 Bands, 118–121 ratio, 328–329 trading strategies and, 120–121, 216, 559 that no longer are profitable, 322 Bandwidth indicator, 121 to its 32-week simple moving average, Bar chart patterns, 125–157. See also Patterns 322–324 behavioral finance and pattern recognition, ADX. See Directional Movement Index 129–130 Alexander, Sidney, 494 classic, 134–149, 156 Alexander’s filter technique, 494–495 computers and pattern recognition, 130–131 American Association of Individual Investors learning objective statements, 125 (AAII), 520–525 long-term, 155–156 American depository receipts (ADRs), 317 market structure and pattern American FinanceCOPYRIGHTED Association, 479, 493 MATERIALrecognition, 131 Amplitude, 348 overview, 125–126 Analysis pattern description, 126–128 description of, 300 profitability of, 133–134 fundamental, 473 Bar charts, 38–39 Andrews, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonic Conditions How to Define Price and Time Cycles
    Interview: Tim Hayes – A Class of its Own Your Personal Trading Coach Issue 03, April 2010 | www.traders-mag.com | www.tradersonline-mag.com Harmonic Conditions How to Define Price and Time Cycles Great Profi ts through When to Trade The Right Use of Failed Chart Patterns & When to Fade Cyclical Analysis We Show You How to Recognise Them Gaining an Edge in Forex Trading Timing Is Everything for Lasting Success TRADERS´EDITORIAL Harmonising Price with Time Harmonising price with time is one of the issues serious traders grapple with at one point in their careers. And how could this possibly be otherwise? After all, if you wish to predict the future you have to consider the past. And if you look back on the history of trading, you will automatically end up coming across some of the heroes who have written this history. Jesse Livermore is one of them, so is Ralph Nelson Elliott and, last but not least, William D. Gann. Among all the greats of the trade he certainly stands out as the enigma. Square of Nine, Gann Lines and Gann Angles, the law of vibration of the sphere of activity, i.e. the rate of internal vibration all of which you will come The harmony of price and time results in incredible forecasts across once you begin to study the trading hero. Gann’s forecasts are credited with 90% success rates and his trading results are said to have amounted to 50 million dollars. Considering that he lived from1878 to 1955, it is easy to imagine what an incredible fortune this would be today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundaries of Technical Analysis Milton W
    The Boundaries of Technical Analysis Milton W. Berg, CFA 1 Market Prognostication In his treatise on stock market patterns, the late Professor Harry V. Roberts1 observed that “of all economic time series, the history of stock prices, both individual and aggregate, has probably been most widely and intensively studied,” and “patterns of technical analysis may be little if nothing more than a statistical artifact.”2 Ibbotson and Sinquefield maintain that historical stock price data cannot be used to predict daily, weekly or monthly percent changes in the market averages. However, they do claim the ability to predict in advance the probability that the market will move between +X% and -Y% over a specific period.3 Only to this very limited extent – forecasting the probabilities of return – can historical stock price movements be considered indicative of future price movements. In Chart 1, we present a histogram of the five-day rate of change (ROC) in the S&P 500 since 1928. The five-day ROC of stock prices has ranged from -27% to + 24%. This normal distribution4 is strong evidence that five-day changes in stock prices are effectively random. Out of 21,165 observations of five-day ROCs, there have been 138 declines exceeding -8%, (0.65% of total) and 150 gains greater than +8% (0.71% of total). Accordingly, Ibbotson and Sinquefield would maintain that over any given 5-day period, the probability of the S&P 500 gaining or losing 8% or more is 1.36%. Stated differently, the probabilities of the S&P 500 returning between -7.99% and +7.99% are 98.64%.
    [Show full text]
  • Ned Davis Research Group
    Ned Davis Research Group THE OUTLooK FOR StoCKS, CoMMODITIES, AND GLOBAL THEMES: SECULAR AND CYCLICAL INFLUENCES Atlanta MTA & CFA Society of Atlanta | September 24, 2008 Tim Hayes, CMT, Chief Investment Strategist The NDR Approach • Identify investment themes and stay with them until a sentiment extreme is reached. • We say… » "Go with the flow until it reaches an extreme and then reverses." » "The big money is made on the big moves." » "Let your profits run, cut your losses short." • We develop reliable indicators and models based on… » "The Tape" – Trend, momentum, confirmation & divergence. » Investor psychology – Sentiment and valuation extremes. » Liquidity – Monetary and economic conditions, supply & demand. • In summary, NDR approach is… » Objective » Disciplined » Risk-Averse » Flexible 1 Ned Davis Research Group Please see important disclosures at the end of this document. CURRENT POSITIONS Global Allocation: Overweight/Bullish: Underweight/Bearish: Stocks » Bonds (by 10%) » Stocks (by 15%) Cash 40% » Cash (by 5%) 15% Bonds 45% » Pacific ex. Japan » U.K. » U.S. » Japan U.S. Allocation: Stocks 40% Cash 20% » Cash (by 10%) » Stocks (by 15%) » Bonds (by 5%) Bonds 40% Styles: » Growth » Value Sectors: » Energy » Consumer Discretionary » Basic Resources » Financials » Consumer Staples » Utilities Commodities: » Correction within secular uptrend Bonds: » 105% of benchmark duration Neutral Positions: » Large-caps vs. Small-caps » Yield curve 2 Ned Davis Research Group Please see important disclosures at the end of this document. We've
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Analysis
    ptg TECHNICAL ANALYSIS ptg Download at www.wowebook.com This page intentionally left blank ptg Download at www.wowebook.com TECHNICAL ANALYSIS THE COMPLETE RESOURCE FOR FINANCIAL MARKET TECHNICIANS SECOND EDITION ptg Charles D. Kirkpatrick II, CMT Julie Dahlquist, Ph.D., CMT Download at www.wowebook.com Vice President, Publisher: Tim Moore Associate Publisher and Director of Marketing: Amy Neidlinger Executive Editor: Jim Boyd Editorial Assistant: Pamela Boland Operations Manager: Gina Kanouse Senior Marketing Manager: Julie Phifer Publicity Manager: Laura Czaja Assistant Marketing Manager: Megan Colvin Cover Designer: Chuti Prasertsith Managing Editor: Kristy Hart Project Editor: Betsy Harris Copy Editor: Karen Annett Proofreader: Kathy Ruiz Indexer: Erika Millen Compositor: Bronkella Publishing Manufacturing Buyer: Dan Uhrig © 2011 by Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as FT Press Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 FT Press offers excellent discounts on this book when ordered in quantity for bulk purchases or special sales. For more information, please contact U.S. Corporate and Government Sales, 1-800-382-3419, [email protected]. For sales outside the U.S., please contact International Sales at [email protected]. ptg Company and product names mentioned herein are the trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America First Printing November 2010 ISBN-10: 0-13-705944-2 ISBN-13: 978-0-13-705944-7 Pearson Education LTD. Pearson Education Australia PTY, Limited. Pearson Education Singapore, Pte. Ltd. Pearson Education Asia, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 2Q Manager's Letter
    Value Fund Portfolio Manager’s Letter Quarter Ended June 30, 2014 July 21, 2014 Dear Aegis Investor: The Aegis Value Fund (Class I) returned 4.39 percent over the second quarter, outpacing the 2.38 percent return of its primary small-cap value benchmark, the Russell 2000 Value Index. Past performance figures for both the Aegis Value Fund and the Russell 2000 Value Index are presented in Table 1, below: Table 1: Performance of the Aegis Value Fund as of June 30, 2014 Annualized Three Year- One Three Five Ten Since I Since A Month to-Date Year Year Year Year Share Share Inception* Inception* Aegis Value Fund Cl. I 4.39% 2.87% 14.78% 16.00% 26.89% 9.26% 12.07% NA Aegis Value Fund Cl. A at NAV 4.34% NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.77% Aegis Value Fund Cl. A -With Load 0.41% NA NA NA NA NA NA -1.08% Russell 2000 Value Index 2.38% 4.20% 22.54% 14.65% 19.88% 8.24% 8.45% 4.40% * Aegis Value Fund Class I (AVALX) and A (AVFAX) Inception were 5/15/98 and 2/26/14, respectively. Performance data quoted represents past performance and does not guarantee future results. Current perfor- mance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that upon redemption, an investor’s shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. For performance data current to the most recent month end, please call us at 800-528-3780 or visit our website at www.aegisfunds.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary, the Market Continues to Be Characterized by · the Strategy Invests Primarily in a Divergences
    Salient Tactical Growth Sub-Advised by Broadmark Asset Management LLC September 2021 Market Update In August, the rapid spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus led to increased investor Strategy Overview concerns over the potential for global supply chain problems and a more pronounced Salient Tactical Growth is designed to slowdown in U.S. and global growth. Asian markets weakened in August as Chinese help investors sidestep market authorities targeted a wide range of firms and industries (in addition to tech companies) downturns, while participating in its with new regulations. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index was down more than -20% from its growth via the continuous and active 1 management of portfolio market most recent peak before rebounding at the end of the month. Also weighing on investor’s exposure. The strategy seeks to minds were the deadly attacks at the Kabul airport and the potential repercussions of a manage risk and enhance alpha with more chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan than anyone had anticipated. the flexibility to be long, short or neutral on the market. Despite these concerns, the S&P 500 Index, Dow Jones Industrial Average and NASDAQ-100 2 · The strategy is designed as a core Index all recorded all-time highs in August, the seventh consecutive month of gains. This investment for those who worry market strength was bolstered by Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks at about losing money in equity market the Fed’s annual Jackson Hole meeting. Powell said that the Fed would likely begin to taper downturns but also want to its asset purchases in the future but is not in a hurry to do so and would give the markets participate in the market’s upside.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Mid-Year Update June 15, 2018
    Baird Market & Investment Strategy 2018 Mid-Year Update June 15, 2018 Please refer to Appendix – Important Disclosures. Outlook Summary Weight of Evidence Argues for Near-Term Caution Despite pockets of strength, stocks remain in consolidation mode Highlights: • Central Banks Moving Away from Accommodating Policies Elevated volatility of first half unlikely to • Economy on Firm Footing as Growth Accelerates ebb in second half • Valuation Excesses Have Not Been Relieved Sentiment at mid-year shows optimism • Investors Moving from Concern to Elation and elevated expectations • Seasonal Headwinds Could Weigh on Small-Caps • Breadth Indicators Not Yet Signaling Resumption of Uptrend Second-half pullback could provide strong foundation for continuation of The weight of the evidence deteriorated over the first half of 2018 (from +1 cyclical rally to 0 to -1) and at mid-year argues that near-term caution is warranted. This was due to shifts in the Market Factors that came, in part, as a response to a return to more normal stock market volatility. Sentiment started the year in bearish territory but moved to bullish as evidence of excessive investor pessimism emerged (sentiment is a contrary opinion indicator). It has since moved back to neutral as the bounce off of the early year lows for the S&P 500 (most recently tested in April) has come with resurgent optimism. Seasonal patterns moved from bullish to bearish as stocks have entered the seasonally weak period ahead of what is set-up to be tumultuous mid-term elections. Breadth has moved from bullish to neutral as the weakness off of the January peak led to deteriorating conditions and the bounce off of the lows has lacked the degree of the broad market participation that typically signals persistent strength.
    [Show full text]
  • ED CLISSOLD, CFA Chief U.S
    Navigating a Mature Bull Market ED CLISSOLD, CFA Chief U.S. Strategist Ned Davis Research Group Generate Alpha. Identify Risk. September 2018 Choose Ned Davis Research. TABLE OF CONTENTS NDR Approach . .1 Fundamental. 2-5 Macro . .6-12 Sentiment . 13-15 Technical . .16-20 Bottom Line. 21-22 NDR House Views . .23 NED DAVIS RESEARCH GROUP Please see important disclosures at the end of this report. i NED DAVIS RESEARCH GROUP APPROACH EXPECTATIONS: How the market Macro SHOULD BE acting ndamenta Fu l Idea TIMING: How the market IS acting Technical S entiment NED DAVIS RESEARCH GROUP Please see important disclosures at the end of this report. 1 FUNDAMENTAL Unprecedented upward earnings revisions. Weekly Data 2011-07-19 to 2018-09-13 Consensus Estimates for S&P 500 Operating Earnings per Share by Calendar Year 182.5 Calendar Year 2012: 03/28/2013 = 96.83 182.5 180.0 Calendar Year 2013: 03/31/2014 = 107.30 180.0 177.5 Calendar Year 2014: 03/31/2015 = 113.03 177.5 175.0 Calendar Year 2015: 03/31/2016 = 100.45 175.0 Calendar Year 2016: 03/31/2017 = 106.26 172.5 Calendar Year 2017: 04/05/2018 = 124.51 172.5 170.0 Calendar Year 2018: 09/13/2018 = 157.74 170.0 167.5 Calendar Year 2019: 09/13/2018 = 177.03 167.5 165.0 165.0 162.5 $145 TO $157 = +8% REVISION 162.5 160.0 160.0 157.5 2018 157.5 155.0 155.0 152.5 152.5 150.0 150.0 147.5 147.5 145.0 145.0 142.5 142.5 140.0 140.0 137.5 137.5 135.0 135.0 132.5 132.5 130.0 130.0 127.5 127.5 125.0 125.0 122.5 122.5 120.0 120.0 117.5 117.5 115.0 115.0 112.5 112.5 110.0 110.0 107.5 107.5 105.0 105.0 102.5 102.5 100.0 100.0 97.5 97.5 95.0 Source: Standard & Poor's 95.0 Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 S677 © Copyright 2018 Ned Davis Research, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativestrength a Valued Investment Factor
    Authors: RelativeStrength A Valued Investment Factor IN BRIEF The effectiveness of Relative Strength has been well researched and has been persistent over long periods of time and across multiple asset classes, both internationally as well as domestically. Relative Strength has been shown to produce better risk-adjusted re- turns over time compared to its universe. David J. Rights Director of Research Relative Strength is quantitative, objective, disciplined and provides eas- 46 Years of Investment Experience ily definable entry and exit points for trades. Clark Capital Management Group uses a Relative Strength-based methodology to manage a number of its investment portfolios. This white paper is intended to serve as a primer for anyone interested in the Relative Strength methodology. This paper will: Define Relative Strength. Provide a summary and sampling of the voluminous academic research supporting Relative Strength, including a detailed bibliography of Relative Strength research. Mason Wev, CFA®, CMT Portfolio Manager Discuss the behavioral finance-based explanations for why Relative Strength is an 19 Years of Investment Experience investment factor. Discuss the weaknesses and limitations of the Relative Strength methodology. Explain why we like Relative Strength as a factor and use it to manage investments. Explain how our Relative Strength-based methodology is different from that of other firms. RelativeStrength A Valued Investment Factor What Is Relative Strength? Relative Strength is often confused with the term “price mo- mentum” or simply “momentum.” Momentum traditional- Relative Strength can be defined as the measurement of a ly refers to the price action of a stock. Research has shown security’s performance relative to a benchmark, to anoth- that it is difficult (in fact, nearly impossible) to predict future er security, or to the other members of a universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management for All Markets by Steve Blumenthal, CIO/CEO of CMG Capital Management Group, Inc
    September 2017 Risk Management for All Markets By Steve Blumenthal, CIO/CEO of CMG Capital Management Group, Inc. Investors need to invest differently in bull markets than they do in bear markets. – Ned Davis Summary A total of seven price trends and countertrends are measured against each industry within the composite and computed daily to reveal a • An introduction to the importance of market breadth measurements composite-level score that measures overall market health (strength in • The construction behind the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large market breadth as measured across 22 S&P 500 GICS industries). Cap Long/Flat Index (NDRCMGLF) This composite score is referred to as the model score. • Risk management during bull and bear markets and navigating secular trends - only 54% of time spent in bull markets historically The model’s investment objective is to be fully invested when the • The merciless mathematics of loss; negative performance requires overall health of the market is strong and rising and to reduce a larger percentage of returns than what was lost to break even exposure when the trend is weakening and declining. When the • 70% of time spent in a bear market or recovering from one model score has been high and rising, the market returns have historically tended to be best. When the model score is low and Insight into market breadth falling, returns have tended to be weakest. “Market breadth” refers to market activity, such as advances and The specific signal-generation calculations for the model’s indicators declines, new highs and new lows, advancing and declining volume, were determined based on historical testing, and the model provides and price momentum based upon the number of stocks in uptrends a summary reading of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • F O R M U L a R E S E a R
    F O R M U L A R E S E A R C H TM Quantitative Treatment of the Financial Markets Volume VII, No. 2 September 10, 2003 Nelson F. Freeburg, Editor Notes & Comments THE MONITOR SERIES : LEADING MARKET PROFESSIONALS SHAR E UNCOMMON INSIGHTS { Don't Miss Part II Synergy and Collaboration: The Asset Management Team of Tom McClellan and Roger Kliminski, Part I As sometimes happens, the material developed in this study proved to be richer and more Two Analysts with Bold Vision Achieve Market-Beating Returns extensive than a single report can accommo- date. To do justice to the findings I had to divide the study into two parts. You will receive the second installment in a couple of weeks. ver thirty years ago market analyst Sherman McClellan and his There we present some of the most profitable O and risk-averse timing methods we have ever mathematician wife Marian introduced a revolutionary market featured. timing tool. Today the McClellan Oscillator stands as one of the most { Help for Market Professionals... popular and effective technical indicators of all time. I am privileged to serve money managers The McClellans went on to create a host of advanced technical of distinction in 26 countries. It's been a pleasure to come to know many of you methods. Ten years ago their son Tom joined the research effort. A personally, even if by the exquisitely West Point graduate who served as an Army helicopter pilot, Tom retired remote medium of email. from active duty as a captain. In 1995 Tom and Sherman, after much As you know, over the past few years preparation and research, founded a first-rate market advisory service.
    [Show full text]