DOCSLIB.ORG

Airstaff Yello Rdy 4 Py

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Airstaff Yello Rdy 4 Py George Marshall, facing imminent war, acted decisively to free airpower from the General Staff’s obstruction and delaying tactics. The First Air Staff By Herman S. Wolk IXTY years ago this month, the United States Army created the Army Air Forces. With that critical June 1941 action came the Sestablishment of the first American Air Staff. That staff reported directly to a new AAF Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Henry H. Arnold. All were momentous steps in development of airpower. Creation of the Air Staff stemmed from apprehension about general Principals in establishing the Air Staff, Maj. Gen. H.H. Arnold and Gen. George C. Marshall are shown here at Randolph Field, Tex. 66 AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2001 USAF photo President Roosevelt—here at an airfield in Sicily talking with Arnold— believed the US had to gear up for war. He sought a huge increase in military aircraft and pilots. wars in Europe and Asia—events expansion plan, envisioning produc- made the airman assistant chief of that sparked calls for an expansion tion each year of 12,000 new pilots staff for operations and training, the of airpower and reorganization of and 54 combat-ready groups. first airman ever to serve in this the Army air element. Particularly position. Subsequently, when Mar- disturbing to Arnold and President The Eye-Opener shall became Army Chief of Staff, Roosevelt was the major role the Marshall, subsequently promoted he named Andrews to positions of German air force played in the de- to Army Chief of Staff, shared Roos- theater command in the Caribbean feat of France in 1940. FDR declared, evelt’s concern and, moreover, agreed and the Middle East and as com- “Military aviation is increasing at an with Arnold that the Air Corps re- manding general of US forces in the unprecedented and alarming rate.” quired a stronger ability to plan for European theater. Tragically, in May Consequently, he and Congress expansion. The Air Corps had found 1943, Andrews was killed in an air- sought a huge increase in American an invaluable ally in the struggle for plane crash in Iceland, cutting short aircraft and pilots. a more powerful air force. In 1938, a brilliant career of one of the nation’s Even before the outbreak of war, Maj. Gen. Frank M. Andrews, then most distinguished airmen. Roosevelt was much concerned about commanding General Headquarters The Luftwaffe’s performance in America’s lack of preparedness. In Air Force, had taken Marshall on a Europe in 1940 increased Congres- 1938, he sent his confidante, Harry nine-day tour of air bases, inspect- sional pressure for the creation of a Hopkins, on an inspection of US air- ing units and meeting senior Air separate Air Force, but Arnold was craft plants. Hopkins claimed Roos- Corps commanders as well as visit- convinced that this was not the right evelt “was sure we were going to get ing the Boeing plant in Seattle. time to divide the air arm from the into war, and he believed that air- Marshall and Andrews struck a close rest of the Army. Marshall and Arnold power would win it.” relationship. Later, Marshall said this needed a rapid, efficient expansion Shortly thereafter, an airplane tour had opened his eyes to what air of the Air Corps itself to prepare for crash claimed the life of Maj. Gen. forces could do and what they re- the possibility of war. Arnold em- Oscar Westover, Chief of the Army quired. He quickly determined that phasized in 1940 that “right at this Air Corps. Hopkins, who had the ear airmen best knew how to run the Air minute it looks to me as if it might be of the President, suggested he ap- Corps and make it work. a serious mistake to change the ex- point Arnold to the post, which On this cross-country trip, Andrews isting setup when we are all using Roosevelt did in September 1938. had taken the opportunity to make every facility available in order to Roosevelt believed that America’s Marshall aware of conflicts between take care of the present expansion of military had to immediately gear up the few airmen and the many ground the Air Corps.” Any serious organi- for war. In mid-November 1938, he officers assigned to the General Staff. zational change now might actually convened a meeting at the White In later remarks, Marshall said he impede the buildup. House to consider responses to the realized that “air had almost no rep- Fortunately, Arnold and Marshall events unfolding in Europe and Asia. resentation on the General Staff,” and maintained confidence in each other, Present were Arnold, Hopkins, As- most of the General Staff types “had with Arnold agreeing not to press sistant Secretary of War Louis John- little interest in the air, mostly an- for independence. He would, instead, son, and Brig. Gen. George C. Mar- tipathy, and it was quite marked.” count on Marshall to provide an ap- shall, chief of the Army’s War Plans Indeed, Marshall added, “I found ev- propriate degree of autonomy dur- Division. Roosevelt directed increased eryone on the Staff hostile to Air.” ing this period of national emergency. aircraft production and by August Marshall was greatly impressed For his part, Marshall was deter- 1940 the Air Corps had completed an with Andrews. In August 1939, he mined to see that the air arm got AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2001 67 kins, for his part, continued to press for an airpower buildup. “I don’t USAF photo know why,” he exclaimed “we are producing 600,000 automobiles for pleasure-seeking people, when we need airplanes and engines!” Bureaucratic Behemoth The Air Corps continued to have difficulty prompting meaningful ac- tion on air matters from the War Department General Staff. Marshall knew that officers on the General Staff failed properly to support the airmen. As a result, air actions tended to be postponed and bottlenecks ap- peared. The General Staff, Marshall said, had “lost track of its purpose,” becoming, in his view, “a huge, bu- reaucratic, red tape–ridden operat- Maj. Gen. Frank Andrews had the foresight to take Marshall, then chief of the ing agency.” He added, “It had slowed Army’s War Plans Division, on a tour of air bases in 1938. Later, Marshall said down everything.” the tour opened his eyes to the capabilities of air and its needs. In summer 1940, Marshall asked Arnold to provide his views on reor- what it required in organizational would be mounted in the Far East. ganization. Marshall was concerned flexibility, as well as equipment. This Arnold noted that, in early 1941, not only about air matters; he believed meant that he would have to present “We were planning for war, even that the War Department had evolved a rationale to the War Department though we were not in it.” In re- into “the poorest command post in the Staff and make organizational changes sponse to the British request for Army.” Arnold responded by propos- that would have credibility with air- American–produced aircraft, he em- ing the appointment of three Army men. phasized to Marshall and Roosevelt deputy chiefs of staff—for ground, that “we must first meet our own air, and service forces. However, the The ABC Meetings requirements” and then should give War Department Staff opposed this The airmen’s drive to gain more allies “only such items as they could step and remained committed to the freedom from the War Department use effectively.” idea that the mission of the air arm was had been boosted early in 1941 when These talks subsequently led to to support the ground forces. representatives of Britain’s armed formal creation in August 1941 of Still navigating between the War services came to the US for strategy the Combined Chiefs of Staff repre- Department Staff and the airmen, discussions, which became known senting the British and US military Marshall in October 1940 named as American–British Conversations forces—including Arnold, represent- Arnold his acting deputy chief of (ABC-1). These ABC-1 meetings ing American airpower. Arnold, of staff for air—responsible for coor- between a US staff committee and course, was subordinate to Marshall, dinating all air matters—and Maj. the British delegation were held in Army Chief of Staff. However, it Gen. George H. Brett as acting chief the period January–March 1941, and was necessary for Arnold to be pres- of the Air Corps. However, the GHQ they ranged over topics as varied as ent when the Combined Chiefs for- Air Force was removed from the ju- strategy, joint operations, geographi- mulated grand strategy. Thus, the air risdiction of the Office of the Chief cal responsibilities, and command forces’ movement toward autonomy of Air Corps, assigned to General arrangements. was aided by the fact that the RAF Headquarters, and placed under the Air Vice Marshal John C. Slessor had long ago gained independence direct control of the commander of represented the Royal Air Force, and and its opposite American number Army field forces. Col. Joseph T. McNarney sat in for needed to be at the table. This setback was ameliorated in the Air Corps. The purpose of the “I often wondered,” Arnold later December 1940 when the Secretary conversations was to determine the noted, “how I came to be included at of War, Henry L. Stimson, named best means with which the US and Argentia [in Newfoundland, site of Robert A. Lovett to be special assis- British might defeat Germany and the meeting that founded the CCS]. tant to the Secretary of War (redes- her allies “should the United States Prior to that time, Air items on a higher ignated in April 1941 “assistant sec- be compelled to resort to war.” level had been handled by the Chief of retary of war for air”).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Foundations of US Air Doctrine
    DISCLAIMER This study represents the views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Air University Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education (CADRE) or the Department of the Air Force. This manuscript has been reviewed and cleared for public release by security and policy review authorities. iii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Watts, Barry D. The Foundations ofUS Air Doctrine . "December 1984 ." Bibliography : p. Includes index. 1. United States. Air Force. 2. Aeronautics, Military-United States. 3. Air warfare . I. Title. 11. Title: Foundations of US air doctrine . III. Title: Friction in war. UG633.W34 1984 358.4'00973 84-72550 355' .0215-dc 19 ISBN 1-58566-007-8 First Printing December 1984 Second Printing September 1991 ThirdPrinting July 1993 Fourth Printing May 1996 Fifth Printing January 1997 Sixth Printing June 1998 Seventh Printing July 2000 Eighth Printing June 2001 Ninth Printing September 2001 iv THE AUTHOR s Lieutenant Colonel Barry D. Watts (MA philosophy, University of Pittsburgh; BA mathematics, US Air Force Academy) has been teaching and writing about military theory since he joined the Air Force Academy faculty in 1974 . During the Vietnam War he saw combat with the 8th Tactical Fighter Wing at Ubon, Thailand, completing 100 missions over North Vietnam in June 1968. Subsequently, Lieutenant Colonel Watts flew F-4s from Yokota AB, Japan, and Kadena AB, Okinawa. More recently, he has served as a military assistant to the Director of Net Assessment, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and with the Air Staff's Project CHECKMATE.
    [Show full text]
  • Bendheim Senior Thesis Department of History, Columbia University
    INCENDIARY WARS: The Transformation of United States Air Force Bombing Policy in the WWII Pacific Theater Gilad Bendheim Senior Thesis Department of History, Columbia University Faculty Advisor: Professor Mark Mazower Second Reader: Professor Alan Brinkley INCENDIARY WARS 1 Note to the Reader: For the purposes of this essay, I have tried to adhere to a few conventions to make the reading easier. When referring specifically to a country’s aerial military organization, I capitalize the name Air Force. Otherwise, when simply discussing the concept in the abstract, I write it as the lower case air force. In accordance with military standards, I also capitalize the entire name of all code names for operations (OPERATION MATTERHORN or MATTERHORN). Air Force’s names are written out (Twentieth Air Force), the bomber commands are written in Roman numerals (XX Bomber Command, or simply XX), while combat groups are given Arabic numerals (305th Bomber Group). As the story shifts to the Mariana Islands, Twentieth Air Force and XXI Bomber Command are used interchangeably. Throughout, the acronyms USAAF and AAF are used to refer to the United States Army Air Force, while the abbreviation of Air Force as “AF” is used only in relation to a numbered Air Force (e.g. Eighth AF). Table of Contents: Introduction 3 Part I: The (Practical) Prophets 15 Part II: Early Operations Against Japan 43 Part III: The Road to MEETINGHOUSE 70 Appendix 107 Bibliography 108 INCENDIARY WARS 2 Introduction Curtis LeMay sat awake with his trademark cigar hanging loosely from his pursed ever-scowling lips (a symptom of his Bell’s Palsy, not his demeanor), with two things on his mind.
    [Show full text]
  • 2D Stryker Cavalry Regiment
    2d Stryker Cavalry Regiment History, Customs and Traditions of the “Second Dragoons” THE OLDEST CONTINUOUSLY SERVING MOUNTED REGIMENT IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY ESTABLISHED 1836 Left Blank Intentionally Dedicated To The soldiers of the 2d Cavalry Regiment who have steadfastly served their nation since 1836. Preface This document is a work of many hands and is intended to be a living reference for the soldiers who serve today as well as a record of the service of those who have preceded them. Special recognition is given to William Heidner and the others who were part of the original team who assembled this book at the direction of the Colonel of the Regiment. In this publication we attempt to preserve and present the essence of what it is to be a 2d Cavalryman. By this effort we wish to carry on the traditions of this special unit and at the same time record the new chapters and pages of history written by today's Dragoons. We intend this to be a living document updated in accordance with the bi-annual schedule of 2d Cavalry Association reunions as well as the experiences and deployments of the Regiment. The content of this document is subject to copyright law and any reproduction or modification of the material here may be subject to approval of the 2d Cavalry Association and the Commanding Officer of the 2d Stryker Cavalry Regiment. All material presented here is based on the best available information at the time of publication and is not intended as a final statement on matters of historical reference nor matters of policy within the Active Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CADET U'i
    THE CADET U'i VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE, FRIDAY, OCTOBER 14. 1910 V. M. I., 0; BLUES, 0 THE Y. M. C. A. FIRST CLASS HOP FAREWELL BANQUET A Hard Fought Game First Meeting—Its Prospects— Largely Attended and Much In- terest Manifested To Be Celebrated New Year's Eve In a downpour of rain with field The Toronto Convention extremely muddy the varsity and Nor- Notwithstanding tne fact that it On the last day of December of folk RliiPS fought to a standstill here The Y. M. C. A. bngaii its work rained hard ill day last Saturday, the each year, the first class, not unwill- lastjSaturday. From beginning until foj. the year on last Sunday night, j hop given by the first class for the ingly, but with a certain feeling of time was called in thi' last quarter, when Colonol Kerlin addressed a benefit of its members, ex-members regret, bids good bye to Father Time the final outconrie was in doubt. V. and the suD-profesaors, was well at- with his three and a half years of iVl. I.'s line was impregnable; and all largt' gathering: of both old and new tended and thoroughly enjoyed. This care and uncertainties. After that efforts to gain through it were futile. ' cadeta. hop was such an entire success that night the members of the graduating Our team played hard straight font ; Mr. .Jackson, who has resigned as it is hoped that many more will fol- class enter upon the last lap of a race ball during the entire game.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Supremacy in US Air Force History, Theory, and Doctrine
    A HOUSE BUILT ON SAND: Air Supremacy in US Air Force History, Theory, and Doctrine E. Taylor Francis Major, USAF Air University James B. Hecker, Lieutenant General, Commander and President LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Brad M. Sullivan, Major General, Commander AIR UNIVERSITY LEMAY CENTER FOR DOCTRINE DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION A House Built on Sand: Air Supremacy in US Air Force History, Theory, and Doctrine E. Taylor Francis, Major, USAF Lemay Paper No. 6 Air University Press Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Air University Commander and President Accepted by Air University Press May 2019 and published April 2020. Lt Gen James B. Hecker Commandant and Dean, LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education Maj Gen Brad Sullivan Director, Air University Press Lt Col Darin M. Gregg Project Editor Dr. Stephanie Havron Rollins Illustrator Daniel Armstrong Print Specialist Megan N. Hoehn Distribution Diane Clark Disclaimer Air University Press Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied 600 Chennault Circle, Building 1405 within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily repre- Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6010 sent the official policy or position of the organizations with which https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress/ they are associated or the views of the Air University Press, LeMay Center, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AirUnivPress Defense, or any other US government agency. This publication is cleared for public release and unlimited distribution. and This LeMay Paper and others in the series are available electronically Twitter: https://twitter.com/aupress at the AU Press website: https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress/ LeMay-Papers/.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Mad: a Short History of City-Busting
    CHAPTER 1 THE ORIGINS OF MAD: A SHORT HISTORY OF CITY-BUSTING Richard R. Muller INTRODUCTION The 20th century was the age of total war, and nothing symbolized that dreadful era more than the bombardment of civilian populations from the air. From its halting beginnings in the First World War, in which 1,141 Britons lost their lives, strategic bombing evolved into the mass air raids of the Second World War, in which some 52,000 British, 330,000 Japanese, and anywhere from 300,000 to 1,000,000 German civilians perished. Nations poured scarce blood and treasure into the development and manning of vast bomber fl eets capable of carrying the war directly to enemy economic and population centers in the hope that this investment would prove decisive in modern warfare.1 The underlying rationale for strategic air warfare predates the reality of manned powered fl ight. Before the arrival of the machine age, wars were fought primarily between the armed forces of the belligerents. The 19th century Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz noted that, while the “center of gravity . the hub of all power and movement” of an enemy state was normally its army, it could also be the capital, a key ally, or even public opinion.2 National power, therefore, could not be measured solely in terms of traditional military capability. Political will, economic productivity, transportation, commerce, and communications became increasingly important factors in struggles between the great powers. The advent of the commercial, fi nancial, and industrial revolutions brought with it the rise of the modern urban center, in which many of these elements were concentrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Airpower Leadership on the Front Line Lt Gen George H
    Airpower Leadership on the Front Line Lt Gen George H. Brett and Combat Command DOUGLAS A. COX Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama September 2006 front.indd 1 11/7/06 10:29:41 AM Air University Library Cataloging Data Cox, Douglas A., 1967- Airpower leadership on the front line : Lieutenant General George H. Brett and combat command / Douglas A. Cox. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-157-0 1. Brett, George H. (George Howard), 1886–1963—Military leadership. 2. Command of troops. 3. Generals—United States—Biography. 4. United States. Army Air Forces— Biography. I. Title. 358.40092––dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii front.indd 2 11/7/06 10:29:41 AM Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ix 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 Notes . 4 2 EARLY LIFE AND CAREER . 5 Notes . 13 3 THE BUILDUP TO WAR . 17 Notes . 25 4 CONFLAGRATION IN THE PACIFIC . 27 Notes . 36 5 AIRPOWER AND ANTAGONISM IN AUSTRALIA . 39 Notes . 62 6 COMMAND IN THE CARIBBEAN . 69 Notes . 79 7 CONCLUSION . 83 Notes . 93 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 95 INDEX . 101 Illustrations Figure 1 Eastern NEI map . 33 2 Australia and New Guinea map .
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care Committee Program Year 2015
    Primary Care Committee Program Year 2015 David Wilner, M.D. CHAIR Silvia Arizaga, MD MBR Medical Director Medical Director Summit ElderCare Sutter SeniorCare PACE 10 Chestnut Street 1234 U Street Worcester, MA 01608 Sacramento, CA 95818-1433 Phone: (508) 368-9675 Phone: (916) 742-0714 Fax: (508) 368-9981 Fax: (916) 446-3699 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Member Organization Type: P PACE Member Organization Type: P PACE George Brett, M.D. CHAIR-VICE Phyllis Baer, M.D. MBR Medical Director LIFE Programs Medical Director Lutheran SeniorLife Harbor Health Services, Inc. 150 Pleasant Drive #201 1135 Morton Street Aliquippa, PA 15001 Mattapan, MA 02126-2834 Phone: (412) 974-7692 Phone: (617) 533-2400 Fax: (724) 302-2093 Fax: (617) 533-2401 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Member Organization Type: PARNT Member Organization Type: P PACE Tahir Ahmed MBR Liliya Balabanova, M.D. MBR Medical Director Primary Care Physician AllCARE for Seniors Sentara PACE PO Box 765 665 Newtown Road Cedar Bluff, VA 24609 Virginia Beach, VA 23462 Phone: (276) 964-4915 Phone: (757) 502-7800 Fax: (276) 963-0130 Fax: E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Member Organization Type: P PACE Member Organization Type: P PACE Rafael Amezcua MBR Nancy Barkowski, MD MBR Medical Director Medical Director Brandman Centers for Senior Care Eddy SeniorCare 7150 Tampa Avenue 504 State Street Reseda, CA 91335-3700 Schenectady, NY 12305-2414 Phone: (559) 392-4175 Phone: (518) 382-3290 Fax: (818) 774-3248 Fax: (518) 382-8001 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Member Organization Type: P PACE Member Organization Type: P PACE Page 1 of 10 8/15/2014 Tim Beittel, MD MBR Adam Burrows, M.D.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the United States Caribbean Defense Command (1941-1947) Cesar A
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-25-2016 A History of the United States Caribbean Defense Command (1941-1947) Cesar A. Vasquez Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC000266 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Latin American History Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Vasquez, Cesar A., "A History of the United States Caribbean Defense Command (1941-1947)" (2016). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2458. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/2458 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida A HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES CARIBBEAN DEFENSE COMMAND (1941-1947) A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY by Cesar A. Vasquez 2016 To: Dean John F. Stack School of International and Public Affairs This dissertation, written by Cesar A. Vasquez, and entitled A History of the United States Caribbean Defense Command (1941-1947), having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Victor Uribe _______________________________________ April Merleaux _______________________________________ Eduardo Gamarra _______________________________________ Kenneth Lipartito, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 25, 2016 The dissertation of Cesar A.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2019 27 02
    AIRLIFT / TANKER QUARTERLY Volume Number SPRING 2019 27 02 Pages 8-10 FIRST U.S. AIRLIFT OF TROOPS TO Maj. Gen. George Churchill Kenney was deadly serious about COMBAT airpower... IN WORLD WAR II FAREWELL TO Page 14 Founder and Executive Officer for Southwest Airlines HERB KELLEHER DELIVERING TOMORROW’S SENIOR LEADER COMMUNICATION CAPABILITIES TODAY. L3’s secure communications architecture – delivering technology to the edge L3 Technologies has proudly been supporting Special Air Missions since 1972, providing the latest advancements in airborne mission and communications systems. We are an agile provider of innovation, integration and collaboration, serving military, homeland security and commercial aviation customers with global communications, ISR and electronic systems. Accelerating the pace of change. L3T.COM DELIVERING TOMORROW’S CONTENTS SENIOR LEADER COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION NEWS AIRLIFT/TANKER QUARTERLY 02 Chairman’s Comments CAPABILITIES TODAY. Volume 27 • Number 2 • Spring 2019 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Airlift/Tanker Association, 7983 Rhodes Farm Way, Chattanooga, 03 President’s Message & Secretary’s Notes Tennessee 37421. Postage paid at St. Louis, Missouri. Subscription rate: $40.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. 04 2018 Year End Financial Report The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profi t professional organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership 14 Farewell to Herb Kelleher in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $40 annually or $110 for L3’s secure communications architecture – delivering technology to the edge three years. Full-time student membership is $15 per year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron's
    The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron’s Experience during the Development of World War II Tactical Air Power by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 14, 2013 Keywords: World War II, fighter squadrons, tactical air power, P-47 Thunderbolt, European Theater of Operations Copyright 2013 by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce Approved by William Trimble, Chair, Alumni Professor of History Alan Meyer, Assistant Professor of History Mark Sheftall, Associate Professor of History Abstract During the years between World War I and World War II, many within the Army Air Corps (AAC) aggressively sought an independent air arm and believed that strategic bombardment represented an opportunity to inflict severe and dramatic damages on the enemy while operating autonomously. In contrast, working in cooperation with ground forces, as tactical forces later did, was viewed as a subordinate role to the army‘s infantry and therefore upheld notions that the AAC was little more than an alternate means of delivering artillery. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt called for a significantly expanded air arsenal and war plan in 1939, AAC strategists saw an opportunity to make an impression. Eager to exert their sovereignty, and sold on the efficacy of heavy bombers, AAC leaders answered the president‘s call with a strategic air doctrine and war plans built around the use of heavy bombers. The AAC, renamed the Army Air Forces (AAF) in 1941, eventually put the tactical squadrons into play in Europe, and thus tactical leaders spent 1943 and the beginning of 1944 preparing tactical air units for three missions: achieving and maintaining air superiority, isolating the battlefield, and providing air support for ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Campaign Planning Handbook
    Air Campaign Planning Handbook WARFARE STUDIES INSTITUTE College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education 625 Chennault Circle Maxwell AFB, AL 36112 March 2000 Preface To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace. --George Washington War is not an affair of chance. A great deal of knowledge, study, and meditation is necessary to conduct it well. --Frederick the Great If I always appear prepared, it is because before entering on an undertaking, I have meditated long and have foreseen what may occur. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly and secretly what I should do in circumstances unexpected by others; it is thought and preparation. --Napoleon “What is campaign planning? Why is campaigning important to me? How do I develop a campaign plan?” The JDACC Air Campaign Planning Handbook will help you find answers to these questions. This handbook, by design, focuses on planning air warfare at the operational level of war; it does not prescribe tactics, techniques, and procedures for executing air attacks. Execution of the plan is critically important and must be thoroughly considered, but before execution, you as a campaign planner must think through the operational-level issues. The campaign plan provides the link that ensures tactical operations will achieve the desired strategic objectives. This handbook presents a way to focus on issues at the operational level of war that make execution meaningful in achieving the theater and national-level goals. Joint Pub 1-02, The Department of Defense Dictionary of Joint Terms, defines a campaign plan as “a plan for a series of related operations aimed to accomplish a common objective, normally within a given time and space.” Campaigns of the American military are joint.
    [Show full text]