DOCSLIB.ORG

A Knowledge Transfer Via Edward Lee Thorndike Learning Theory in E-Learning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Knowledge Transfer Via Edward Lee Thorndike Learning Theory in E-Learning A Knowledge Transfer Via Edward Lee Thorndike Learning Theory in E-Learning Natthaphong Luangnaruedom1, Supanut Kankaew2, Wararat Niyomkha3, Chatchada Chawarangkoon4, and Waraphon Manthung5 1, 3Computer Science Division, Faculty of Science and Technology, 2Business Administration and Information Technology, 4, 5Multimedia Technology Division, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya, Thailand [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract - E-Learning was the learning tool I. INTRODUCTION for transfer knowledge to the learners that could learn anytime anywhere example In new age, E-Learning was the important Google classroom, smart classroom etc. learning process for learners because the Learners could be learning by themselves, behaviors of learners changed from the past. In the teachers or lectures would be the the past learning process was in classroom in consultant or mentor when learners had time of school, college or university. But in problems or not understand in any topics of new age the learning would be the any time e-learning. General Concept for developed any where learning. The learning did not have the E-Learning might use the any learning limited on time or place so, E-Learning was theory look the learning finally or leaning the best practice on leaning for new age outcome more important than anything. learner. But, in real had many factors that were impact to leaning process. Behaviors of Although the E-Learning was the important learners were the most impact for learning learning tools. But e-learning could not really process. Thorndike’s Theory described the respond the behavior of learners. The outcome law of learners’ behaviors that had impact of knowledge transfer from e-learning was on learning way. So, the development unsuccessful. process of E-Learning must design on behaviors’ theory of Thorndike. Knowledge So, Edward Lee Thorndike’ Learning Theory transfer by E-Learning had been develop on would be necessary for knowledge transfer on behaviors’ learners would be the better E-Learning. more than general e-learning. II. THEORY Keywords - E-Learning, Thorndike, Learning A. Knowledge Transfer Theory Knowledge Transfer or Technology Transfer was the process for transfer knowledge, procedure, process, methodology or the others from senders to receivers. The Fourteenth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, 18 March 2018, Thailand 25.1 A Knowledge Transfer Via Edward Lee Thorndike Learning Theory in E-Learning Wikipedia define the definition of fish. technology transfer, was the process of transferring technology from the places and Eventually they would stumble upon the ingroups of its origination to wider distribution lever which opened the cage. When it had among more people and places. It occurs escaped it was put in again, and once more the along various axes: among universities, from time it took to escape was noted. In successive universities to businesses, from large businesses to trials the cats would learn that pressing the smaller ones, from governments to businesses, lever would have favorable consequences and across borders, both formally and informally, they would adopt this behavior, becoming and both openly and surreptitiously. increasingly quick at pressing the lever. B. Edward Lee Thorndike So, from the study of cat behavior Edward Edward Thorndike (1874 - 1949) is famous Lee Thorndike had announce the theory of in psychology for his work on learning theory Learning “Law of Effect”. that lead to the development of operant conditioning within behaviorism. C. Law of Effect 1. Law of Readiness means the state of Whereas classical conditioning depends on readiness or maturity of the body, the body, developing associations between events, the organs of learning and the mind. Including operant conditioning involves learning from basic and original experience. Conditions of the consequences of our behavior. Skinner ear, eye, brain, and muscles. The original wasn’t the first psychologist to study learning experience is linked to new knowledge or new by consequences. Indeed, Skinner's theory of things. As well as interest Understanding what operant conditioning is built on the ideas of to see. If the student is ready for these Edward Thorndike. elements. It will make learning. Thorndike (1898) studied learning in 2. Law of Exercise means that the student animals (usually cats). He devised a classic practices or repeats frequently. It will make experiment in which he used a puzzle box (see perfect. This rule emphasizes stability between fig. 1) to empirically test the laws of learning. the link and the correct response. 3. Law of Effect this rule is a result of satisfaction, ie, when the organism is satisfied. Will make or link solid rigid. On the other hand, if organic gets dissatisfied. Will bond or link between stimulus and weak response. Or can say that. If organic is satisfied with the results of the activity. It will be good to learn to make organic to learn more. In the opposite way if organic gets unpleasant results. I do not want to learn. Tired and frustrated learning. III. EDWARD LEE THORNDIKE Fig. 1 Simplified Graph of the Result LEARNING THEORY IN E-LEARNING of the Puzzle Box Experiment. From Edward Lee Thorndike’s Law of He placed a cat in the puzzle box, which Effect could applied to make the model for was encouraged to escape to reach a scrap of development E-Learning show on Fig. 2. fish placed outside. Thorndike would put a cat into the box and time how long it took to escape. The cats experimented with different ways to escape the puzzle box and reach the The Fourteenth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, 18 March 2018, Thailand 25.2 Natthaphong Luangnaruedom, Supanut Kankaew, Wararat Niyomkha, Chatchada Chawarangkoon, and Waraphon Manthung the study request. The knowledge transfer would successful with the behaviors theory on e-learning. REFERENCES (Arranged in the order of citation in the same fashion as the case of Footnotes.) [1] Simply Psychology. (2018). “Edward Thorndike: The Law of Effect”. <https://www.simplypsychology.org/ed ward-thorndike.html>. [2] Wikipedia. “Edward Thorndike”. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_ Thorndike>. Fig. 2 Law of Effect in E-Learning Development Model [3] Wikipedia. “Law of effect”. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_e From Fig. 2 explained: ffect>. 1) Interest of Learners was the process that [4] Wikipedia. “Technology transfer”. focus on the interesting thing of the learners. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technolo Example the topic of technology. gy_transfer>. [5] Bari, M. and Djouab, R. (2014). “Quality 2) Behaviors of learners was the study of Frameworks and Standards in E-Learning behaviors’ learners in daily and behavior on Systems”. International Journal of the study. Example frequency of reading in daily. Computer, the Internet and Management, Vol. 22(3), September-December, 2014, pp. 3) Development E-Learning was the 1-7. process after kept the result of process 1 and 2. [6] Charmonman, S., Mongkhonvanit, P., Develop e-learning application used by the and Patthamasoot, K. (2014). “MOOC and kept data. E-Learning 2014”. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and 4) Achievement was the process of record Management, Vol. 22(3), September- the outcome of e-learning that develop. December, 2014, pp. 8-17. 5) Stimulation Study was the process of study the stimulus factors that have effect in learning process. 6) Re-Development E-learning was the process of development new e-learning after study all of 1-5 process. IV. CONCLUSION The Knowledge transfer via Edward Lee Thorndike Learning theory in E-Learning would increase the accomplishment of learners in learning process. Behaviors of learners would be the determinant of e-learning and learning process. E-Learning that developed on behaviors’ learners would really respond The Fourteenth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, 18 March 2018, Thailand 25.3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Learning Theory This Course Will Cover the Fundamentals Of
    Learning Theory This course will cover the fundamentals of pedagogy and andragogy, as well as examine different theories in learning. We will analyze the particular characteristics of adult learning, identifying the contributions of theoretical and scientific support to andragogy, its principles and applications. Also we will evaluate the concept and importance of permanent or life-long education. Hopefully you will come away with a better sense of how humans learn and how you in particular can continue to learn. What is learning? Learning involves change. It is concerned with the acquisition of habits, knowledge, and attitudes. It enables the individual to make both personal and social adjustments. Since the concept of change is inherent in the concept of learning, any change in behavior implies that learning is taking place or has taken place. Learning that occurs during the process of change can be referred to as the learning process. Learning is a change in the individual, due to the interaction of that individual, and his environment, which fills a need to make him more capable of dealing adequately with his environment. A distinction is frequently made between education and learning. Education is an activity undertaken or initiated by one or more agents that is designed to effect changes in the knowledge, skill, and attitudes of individuals, groups, or communities. The term education emphasizes the educator, the agent of change who presents stimuli and reinforcement for learning and designs activities to induce change. The term learning, in contrast, emphasizes the person in whom the change occurs or is expected to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Pavlov, Thorndike, and Skinner: Other Early Behaviorist Theories
    Supplementary reading in the Companion Website accompanying HUMAN LEARNING 5/E by J. E. Ormrod, 2008, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Copyright© 2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. BEYOND PAVLOV, THORNDIKE, AND SKINNER: OTHER EARLY BEHAVIORIST THEORIES Chapters 3 and 4 in Human Learning describe the work of three prominent early behaviorists: Ivan Pavlov, Edward Thorndike, and B. F. Skinner. But other theorists had a significant impact on early behaviorist thinking as well. Here we’ll focus on three especially notable ones: John Watson, Edwin Guthrie, and Clark Hull. John Watson It was actually John Watson (1913) who introduced the term behaviorism and served as the most vocal advocate for the behaviorist perspective in the early part of the twentieth century. In his major writings, Watson (1914, 1916, 1919, 1925) adamantly called for the introduction of scientific objectivity and experimentation into the study of psychological phenomena. He emphasized the need for focusing scientific inquiry on observable behaviors rather than on such nonobservable phenomena as “thinking.” Not only did Watson oppose the study of internal mental events, but he also denied any existence of the mind at all! Thought, he proposed, was nothing more than tiny movements of the tongue and larynx and thus was a behavior just like any other. Greatly influenced by the work of both Pavlov and another Russian, Vladimir Bechterev (1913), Watson adopted the classically conditioned S-R habit as the basic unit of learning and extended it to human learning (e.g., see Watson and Rayner’s study with an infant named Albert, described in Chapter 3).1 Watson proposed two laws describing how such habits develop.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Main Theories on Acquisition and Development Del Language. 3.1 Learning Theories: Watson and Skinner Operant Conditioning B
    SEC 3 Page 1 of 9 3. MAIN THEORIES ON ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT DEL LANGUAGE. 3.1 LEARNING THEORIES: WATSON AND SKINNER OPERANT CONDITIONING By the 1920s John B. Watson had left academic psychology and other behaviorists were becoming influential, proposing new forms of learning other than classical conditioning. Perhaps the most important of these was Burrhus Frederic Skinner; Although, for obvious reasons he is more commonly known as B.F. Skinner. Skinner's views were slightly less extreme than those of Watson. Skinner believed that we do have such a thing as a mind, but that it is simply more productive to study observable behavior rather than internal mental events. Skinner believed that the best way to understand behavior is to look at the causes of an action and its consequences. He called this approach operant conditioning. Skinner's theory of operant conditioning was based on the work of Thorndike (1905). Edward Thorndike studied learning in animals using a puzzle box to propose the theory known as the 'Law of Effect'. BF Skinner: Operant Conditioning Skinner is regarded as the father of Operant Conditioning, but his work was based on Thorndike’s law of effect. Skinner introduced a new term into the Law of Effect - Reinforcement. Behavior which is reinforced tends to be repeated (i.e. strengthened); behavior which is not reinforced tends to die out-or be extinguished (i.e. weakened). Skinner (1948) studied operant conditioning by conducting experiments using animals which he placed in a “Skinner Box” which was similar to Thorndike’s puzzle box. B.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Peculiarities of Social Mental Abilities of Future Teachers
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION 2016, VOL. 11, NO. 18,12629-12636 OPEN ACCESS Structural Peculiarities of Social Mental Abilities of Future Teachers Ardakh Rizabekovna Yermentayevaa,Kundyz Serikovna Kenzhebayevab,Akerke Nurlanbekovna Umirbekovac, Zhanat Kanashovna Aubakirovad, and Akmaral Bakytbekovna Iskakovad a N.Gumilyov Eurasian National University, KAZAKHSTAN, b The Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University, KAZAKHSTAN, c Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, KAZAKHSTAN, d University Turan-Astana, KAZAKHSTAN, ABSTRACT The problem of social intelligence of researchers has attracted attention in recent years. Social intelligence is one of the most important characteristics of teachers. The aim of this research was to study features of structure of social intelligence of future teachers. The respondents in this study were selected 360 students of pedagogical specialties from Kyzylorda State University. The following tools are used in the work: methods of investigation of social intellect by J.P. Guilford and M.O. Sullivan. Results of theoretical and experimental studies have revealed general and specific features of social intelligence of future teachers. The results of research indicated that normative-role values accepted in society are significant for respondents; the students are guided by these values in situations of interpersonal interactions. Dynamics of parameters of social intelligence of respondents was performed. Gender features of social intelligence of future teachers were established. Differences which were related with professional specialization were not found. KEYWORDS ARTICLE HISTORY Teacher, social intelligence, interpersonal Received 11 April 2016 interaction, specialization, dynamics Revised 07 August 2016 Accepted 30 August 2016 Introduction There is a considerable amount of research of social structure of social intelligence for both children and adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology: Behaviorism
    Psychology: Behaviorism Skill: Objectives: ​ ● Students will explain what constitutes Classical Conditioning, as well as describe the type of behavior for which this type of conditioning is suitable. ● Students will explain what constitutes Operant Conditioning, as well as describe the type of behavior for which this conditioning is suitable. ● Students will then compare and contrast Classical and Operant conditioning. Online Activity Have students look up and read about the experiments of Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and Edward Thorndike, and B.F. Skinner. Ask students to pay special attention to the differences between Classical (Pavlov and Watson) and Operant (Thorndike and Skinner) Conditioning. Online Websites that contain relevant articles include (or you can research your own): https://www.simplypsychology.org/classical-conditioning.html https://www.simplypsychology.org/operant-conditioning.html https://www.verywellmind.com/classical-conditioning-2794859 https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-psychology/chapter/classical-conditioning/ https://www.verywellmind.com/operant-conditioning-a2-2794863 https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-psychology/chapter/operant-conditioning/ Online Activity 1 Complete the Following Questions: 1. What are the three steps to Classical Conditioning? 2. What type of behavior does Classical Conditioning address? 3. Describe Pavlov’s Experiment. 4. Describe Watson’s Experiment. 5. What are the steps to Operant Conditioning? 6. What were Thorndike’s Contributions to Operant Conditioning? 7. Describe Skinner’s Experiment. 8. Explain the difference between Primary and Secondary Reinforcers. 9. Describe the four different reinforcement schedules. 10. Compare and Contrast Classical and Operant Conditioning in paragraph form. Online Activity 2 Complete ONE of the following options: ● Draw a cartoon depicting the differences between positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, and negative punishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical and Hands-On Behavioral Psychology in the Self-Contained Classroom Zachary Sanford, 2017 CTI Fellow William A
    Practical and Hands-on Behavioral Psychology in the Self-Contained Classroom Zachary Sanford, 2017 CTI Fellow William A. Hough High School This curriculum unit is recommended for: Teachers of high school self-contained Special Education classes and for teachers of general education high school psychology classes in order to provide laboratory experience. Keywords: Scientific Method, Informed Consent, Psychology, Behavioral Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Stimulus, Response, Behavior, Unconditioned Stimulus, Unconditioned Response, Conditioned Stimulus, Conditioned Response, Operant Conditioning, Positive Reinforcement, Negative Reinforcement, Positive Punishment, Negative Punishment, Extinction, Differential Reinforcement, Applied Behavioral Analysis, Social Learning Theory, Social Learning Teaching Standards: See Appendix 1 for teaching standards addressed in this unit. Synopsis: The focus of this unit is on behavioral psychology and creating hands on experiences for students with and without intellectual disabilities. This unit will provide a completed adapted chapter with picture symbols, adapted text, hands on experiences, adapted worksheets, and adapted assessment activities. The unit will begin with a brief summary and definitions of behavior, stimulus, psychology, and behaviorism. The students will have an opportunity to collect data on different stimuli during an activity. The unit will then provide information, videos, and hands on activities involving Classical Conditioning, Operant Conditioning, and Observational Learning. The students will also be provided with information about important research and the practitioners who helped to develop the major concepts and knowledge base of behavioral psychology. At the end of each section, the students will have the ability to demonstrate their learning by conducting hands on conditioning experiments. The students will be assessed using vignettes that will require students to apply their knowledge and understanding of the major concepts of behavioral psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis the Role of Affective Interest in Vocational
    ! THESIS THE ROLE OF AFFECTIVE INTEREST IN VOCATIONAL INTEREST MEASUREMENT Submitted by Casey C. Onder Department of Psychology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2012 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Bryan Dik Zinta Byrne Rich Feller ! ! ABSTRACT THE ROLE OF AFFECTIVE INTEREST IN VOCATIONAL INTEREST MEASUREMENT Most vocational interest inventories used today operationalize interests in terms of enjoyment or liking. The potential role of affective interest in vocational preferences has not been examined empirically, despite indications that affective interest and enjoyment are distinct as emotions. The present study aimed to extend research distinguishing affective interest from enjoyment to the context of vocational preferences, and to determine whether incorporating affective interest items into an enjoyment-based vocational interest measure would improve its criterion-related validity for academic major choice and satisfaction. 423 university undergraduates completed online survey items rating vocational activities on various dimensions, including enjoyment and interest, and indicated their academic majors and major satisfaction. Results regarding the discriminant validity of enjoyment and interest in vocational activities were mixed. Affective interest did not have incremental criterion-related validity for academic major choice and satisfaction. These findings and the study’s limitations suggest the need for further research on the potential
    [Show full text]
  • HANDBOOK of PSYCHOLOGY: VOLUME 1, HISTORY of PSYCHOLOGY
    HANDBOOK of PSYCHOLOGY: VOLUME 1, HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY Donald K. Freedheim Irving B. Weiner John Wiley & Sons, Inc. HANDBOOK of PSYCHOLOGY HANDBOOK of PSYCHOLOGY VOLUME 1 HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY Donald K. Freedheim Volume Editor Irving B. Weiner Editor-in-Chief John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This book is printed on acid-free paper. ➇ Copyright © 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, e-mail: [email protected]. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences That Led to Social Efficiency As Dominant Curriculum Ideology in Progressive Era in the US
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in . Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Tahirsylaj, A. (2017) Curriculum Field in the Making: Influences That Led to Social Efficiency as Dominant Curriculum Ideology in Progressive Era in the U.S.. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 4(1): 618-628 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-69841 European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2017 Vol. 4, No. 1, 618-628 Curriculum Field in the Making: Influences That Led to Social Efficiency as Dominant Curriculum Ideology in Progressive Era in the U.S. Tahirsylaj, Armend Linnaeus University Email: [email protected] Abstract This article problematizes the development of curriculum field in the United States at the turn of the 20th century. During the time, the curriculum field was – and to some extent still is - far from a clearly defined, unified, well- established theory of education or education programme. The present article addresses the development of curriculum field in the United States through a historical lens. Specifically, it initially briefly discusses the four widely- recognized competing curriculum ideologies or approaches, namely humanists, developmentalists, social reconstruction, and social efficiency, as well as European influences on these approaches. In the second part, it discusses how social efficiency model became the prevailing education ideology throughout the 20th century to date in the U.S. context. It is concluded that prevailing interests and needs of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Theories
    The Students' Guide to Learning Design and Research Royce Kimmons & Secil Caskurlu Version: 0.88 Built on: 11/07/2020 12:10pm This book is provided freely to you by CC BY: This work is released under a CC BY license, which means that you are free to do with it as you please as long as you properly attribute it. Table of Contents About this Book ........................................................................................................................... 4 Learning Theories .............................................................................................................................. 5 Behaviorism ................................................................................................................................. 6 Cognitivism ................................................................................................................................ 13 Constructivism ........................................................................................................................... 20 Socioculturalism ........................................................................................................................ 26 Research Methods ........................................................................................................................... 35 Case Studies .............................................................................................................................. 36 Design-Based Research ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Psychologues Américains
    Psychologues américains A G (suite) M (suite) • Robert Abelson • Gustave M. Gilbert • Christina Maslach • Gordon Willard • Carol Gilligan • Abraham Maslow Allport • Stephen Gilligan • David McClelland • Richard Alpert • Daniel Goleman • Phil McGraw • Dan Ariely • Thomas Gordon • Albert Mehrabian • Solomon Asch • Temple Grandin • Stanley Milgram • Blake Ashforth • Clare Graves • Geoffrey Miller • David Ausubel • Joy Paul Guilford (psychologue) • Moubarak Awad • George Armitage H Miller B • Theodore Millon • G. Stanley Hall • James Baldwin • Daria Halprin N (psychologue) • Harry Harlow • Theodore Barber • Alan Hartman • Ulric Neisser • Gregory Bateson • Torey Hayden • Richard Noll • Diana Baumrind • Frederick Herzberg • Alex Bavelas • Ernest Hilgard O • Don Beck • James Hillman • Benjamin Bloom • Allan Hobson • James Olds • Edwin Garrigues • John L. Holland Boring • John Henry Holland P • Loretta Bradley • Evelyn Hooker • Nathaniel Branden • Carl Hovland • Baron Perlman • Urie Bronfenbrenner • Clark Leonard Hull • Walter Pitts • Joyce Brothers • Jerome Bruner J R • David Buss • Howard Buten • William James • Joseph Banks Rhine • Kay Redfield Jamison • Kenneth Ring C • Irving Janis • Judith Rodin • Arthur Janov • Carl Rogers • John Bissell Carroll • Joseph Jastrow • Milton Rokeach • James McKeen Cattell • Julian Jaynes • Eleanor Rosch • Raymond Cattell • Arthur Jensen • Marshall Rosenberg • Cary Cherniss • Frank Rosenblatt • Robert Cialdini K • Robert Rosenthal • Mary Cover Jones • Julian Rotter • Lee Cronbach • Daniel Kahneman • Paul Rozin
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Politics: the Rise of Personality Traits in The
    PERSONAL POLITICS: THE RISE OF PERSONALITY TRAITS IN THE CENTURY OF EUGENICS AND PSYCHOANALYSIS IAN J. DAVIDSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PSYCHOLOGY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST 2020 © IAN J. DAVIDSON, 2020 ii Abstract This dissertation documents personality psychology’s development alongside psychoanalysis and eugenics, offering a disciplinary and cultural history of personality across the twentieth century. Using the psychological concepts of neurosis and introversion as an organizational framework, personality’s history is portrayed as one of “success:” a succession of hereditarianism and its politics of normativity; a successful demarcation of the science of personality from competing forms of expertise; and a successful cleansing of personality psychology’s interchanges with unethical researchers and research. Chapter 1 provides background for the dissertation, especially focusing on turn-of-the- century developments in the nascent fields of American psychology and the importation of psychoanalytic ideas. It ends with a look at Francis Galton’s eugenicist and statistical contributions that carved a key path for psychological testers to discipline psychoanalytic concepts. Part I details the rise of personality testing in the USA during the interwar years, while also considering the many sexual and gender norms at play. Chapter 2 tracks the varied places in the 1920s that personality tests were developed: from wartime military camps to university laboratories to the offices of corporate advertisers. Chapter 3 takes stock of popular psychoanalytic notions of personality alongside the further psychometric development of personality testing. These developments occurred at a time when American eugenicists— including psychologists—were transitioning to a “positive” form that emphasized marriage and mothering.
    [Show full text]