East Asia Insights Toward Community Building

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

East Asia Insights Toward Community Building EAST ASIA INSIGHTS TOWARD COMMUNITY BUILDING Japan Center for International Exchange Vol. 1 No. 2 | March 2006 Japan and China at a Crossroads Hitoshi Tanaka, Senior Fellow, JCIE Postwar ties between Japan and China, while distin- and deeply reproaches itself.” This document is now guished by normalized relations, economic coopera- recognized as the basic foundation of postwar Japan- tion, and political dialogue, are now at a crossroads. China relations. Although often cited as causes of the impasse, sources In 1972, as Japan established relations with China, of disagreement such as visits to Yasukuni Shrine by it ended official ties with Taiwan, but it has retained Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi are, rather, nongovernmental relations through the Taiwan offices manifestations of structural changes taking place in the of the Interchange Association. Taiwan maintains unof- region’s most important bilateral relationship. Regard- ficial representation in Japan through the Taipei Eco- less of these issues, most East Asian countries believe nomic and Cultural Representative Office. that an improvement in Japan-China relations is essen- Six years later, in 1978, Japan and China concluded tial for the future stability and prosperity of the region. the Treaty of Peace and Friendship. The treaty affirms Restructuring bilateral relations requires a critical mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, understanding of broad, long-term geopolitical and mutual nonaggression, noninterference, and further structural changes that have been taking place in Japan, development of economic and cultural relations. This China, and around the world for the past two decades. document is the second foundation of Japan-China relations. Historical Framework of Japan-China Relations Normalized relations brought increased economic The U.S. détente with China in the early 1970s prompted interdependence. Trade grew from US$1.1 billion in Japan to rethink its China policy, and the 1972 Japan- 1972 to almost US$20 billion in 1988. Japan understood China Joint Communiqué was a response to this rap- the importance of a strong Chinese market: not only idly changing world. The communiqué contains three would it benefit Japan, but it would also help stabilize key points. First, it states that Japan “recognizes . the East Asia. In 1979, it launched an official development Government of the People’s Republic of China as the assistance (ODA) program for China to promote eco- sole legal Government of China.” Second, it affirms that nomic stability and growth. Several rounds of loans, China considers Taiwan part of its territory and that grant aid, and technical cooperation totaling more than Japan “fully understands and respects this stand of the US$30 billion have been disbursed to China since the Government of the People’s Republic of China.” Al- start of the program. More than three-fourths of these though not noted in the communiqué, Japan has since loans have been used to fund large-scale economic in- expressed that it “strongly hopes that the issues sur- frastructure projects to develop roads, rail, airports, and rounding Taiwan will be solved in a peaceful manner power stations. by direct talks between the parties concerned.” Finally, Japan also promoted international political engage- the communiqué notes that Japan “is keenly conscious ment with China—even in the aftermath of Tiananmen of the responsibility for the serious damage that Japan Square in 1989. The G7 Summit Communiqué released caused in the past to the Chinese people through war, in July of that year urged China to “create conditions which enable them to avoid isolation.” This was a result changes in recent years. These developments have of Japan’s efforts during negotiations on the communi- changed the way that Japan and China view each other, qué. Two years later, Prime Minister Toshiki Kaifu was the and they have altered the nature of the relationship. first G7 leader to visit China after Tiananmen Square. The end of the Cold War and China’s pursuit of eco- Political relations in the 1990s were marked by three nomic growth have played key roles in transforming re- historic milestones. In 1992, Emperor Akihito and Em- gional geopolitics. First, the fall of the Soviet Union en- press Michiko of Japan made the first Imperial visit to abled China to vastly improve relations with its neigh- China since World War II. The emperor expressed his bor. The two countries signed an agreement that re- sorrow about the war and deep remorse about past ag- solved all border demarcation issues. Second, relations gressions. On the 50th anniversary of the end of World between China and the United States have significantly War II in 1995, Japanese Prime Minister Tomiichi improved over the past five years. Third, Chinese rela- Murayama issued a public statement of “heartfelt apol- tions with other Asian countries have also improved. ogy” to the people who suffered from colonial rule For example, long-standing disputes over the Spratley and aggression. Then in 1998, Chinese President Jiang Islands, and the China-Vietnam and China-India bor- Zemin made a historic visit to Japan as the first Chinese ders have been addressed. Fourth, China has actively head of state to do so since the end of the war. There pursued multilateral diplomacy in the region through are differing views as to the success of this significant forums such as the six-party talks on North Korea and visit, but regardless, the Joint Declaration on “Building ASEAN+3. a Partnership of Friendship and Cooperation for Peace China has developed much stronger relations with and Development,” in which Japan expresses “deep re- most of its regional partners, and it has become a major morse” for the war, was adopted, becoming the third international player. Its adoption of a more accommo- foundation of Japan-China relations. These events are dating foreign policy stems in large part from a need manifestations of the recognition of past history on for stable relations with its partners to ensure economic both sides. growth. Perhaps ironically, Japan’s policy of engaging Economic ties expanded throughout the 1990s as China with the international community has helped well. Japan continued to cooperate with China through contribute to a situation in which Japan’s importance its ODA programs, investment, and its strong support has decreased somewhat in the eyes of China. for China’s accession to the World Trade Organization The growing strength of the Chinese economy in 2001. But toward the end of the 1990s, the Japanese coupled with the continued stagnation of the Japanese media and National Diet members began to question economy over the past 15 years have started to change the rationale of an economically stagnant Japan pro- the way Japan views its neighbor. While Japan used viding ODA to a booming China. An official review was to consider China as a still-developing entity, recently conducted, and in 2001 Japan significantly scaled back there has been a growing feeling that China is rapidly its assistance. “catching up” with Japan. It is becoming a formidable Since that time, numerous irritants in the relation- economic competitor and a possible geopolitical rival. ship have risen to the fore. On the Japanese side, these The relative strengths of the two countries are chang- include the North Korean refugee incident at the Japa- ing, and Japan is watching its neighbor’s growth with a nese consulate in Shenyang in 2002; heckling of the feeling of uncertainty about its own future. Japanese national soccer team by Chinese fans at the Major structural changes inside China, most signifi- Asian Cup in China in 2004; the intrusion of a Chinese cantly a proliferation of new venues for public expres- nuclear attack submarine into Japanese waters in 2004; sion in Chinese society, have also played a major role China’s move to block Japan’s candidacy for the UN in changing relations. Although the Communist Party Security Council in 2005; and violent anti-Japan dem- used to have widespread control over independent po- onstrations across China in 2005. On the Chinese side, litical expression in China, recent market expansion irritants include Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s and the resulting influx of inexpensive cellular phone repeated visits to Yasukuni Shrine, and in 2003, a leak and Internet technologies have created new spaces for of mustard gas from chemical weapons barrels left by public discussion and action in China that never existed the Japanese Imperial Army, injuring dozens. These before. The anti-Japan movement of 2005, for example, and other incidents have exacerbated what has become was catalyzed and coordinated by ordinary citizens who a tense relationship. had access to this technology. Deliberate dissemination of key information helped galvanize what became an Framing the New Relationship: Geopolitical adhoc, popular anti-Japan movement. and Structural Changes A second structural change in China is the rise to Thinking anew about Japan-China relations requires power of the current “fourth generation” of Communist looking back at important geopolitical and structural Party leaders. This group has the potential to positively EAST ASIA INSIGHTS 2 Vol. 1 No. 2 | March 2006 influence the bilateral relationship: its members came genuine remorse for its past and believes that it is not of age two decades after the war, and they have a more a responsible member of the international community. flexible approach toward Japan than their predecessors. Despite its past 60 years of peaceful development and The rise of the anti-Japan movement, however, has lim- democracy, Japan is not qualified, in the eyes of China, ited the fourth generation’s ability to engage Japan. to assume international leadership positions in East Meanwhile, Japan has been undergoing major struc- Asia or the United Nations, and it is not to be trusted. tural changes of its own, starting with its domestic poli- Another interpretation is intertwined with geopo- tics.
Recommended publications
  • The Failed Marshall Plan: Learning from US Foreign Policy Missteps
    Transcript The Failed Marshall Plan: Learning from US Foreign Policy Missteps Daniel Kurtz-Phelan Executive Editor, Foreign Affairs, Author, The China Mission: George Marshall’s Unfinished War, 1945- 47 Chair: Dr Leslie Vinjamuri Head, US and the Americas Programme and Dean of the Queen Elizabeth II Academy, Chatham House 10 September 2018 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the speaker(s) and participants, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication or details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event, every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions. The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. © The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2018. 10 St James’s Square, London SW1Y 4LE T +44 (0)20 7957 5700 F +44 (0)20 7957 5710 www.chathamhouse.org Patron: Her Majesty The Queen Chairman: Stuart Popham QC Director: Dr Robin Niblett Charity Registration Number: 208223 2 The Failed Marshall Plan: Learning from US Foreign Policy Missteps Dr Leslie Vinjamuri And it’s wonderful to see so many people here on a Monday afternoon after a lovely weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman´S Statement of the 12Th ASEAN Summit
    Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2007 Departamento de Asia y Pacífico Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Chairperson’s Statement of the 12th ASEAN Summit H.E. the President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. “ONE CARING AND SHARING COMMUNITY” Cebu, Philippines,13 January 2007 We, the Heads of State and/or Government of ASEAN Member Countries, had a very productive 12th ASEAN Summit Meeting, on 13 January 2007 in Cebu, Philippines. We exchanged views on regional and international developments, focusing on how we may deepen ASEAN integration to better foster the region’s sustainable development, stability, security and prosperity for the benefit of all our peoples. We resolved to uphold the centrality of ASEAN and to enhance its standing as an effective driving force for regional initiatives and collective responses to the challenges and opportunities facing our region, countries and peoples. We stressed that the ASEAN community we are building shall be a community of peoples caring for and sharing their human, natural and cultural resources and strengths for their common good and mutual benefit. Cebu Declaration on the Blueprint of the ASEAN Charter We recognized that ASEAN must manage the key challenges of regional integration, globalization, economic growth and new technologies. In doing so, we acknowledged that ASEAN must remain cohesive with strong institutions and responsive policies for regional community building. To help realize this vision, we signed the Cebu Declaration on the Blueprint of the ASEAN Charter to endorse the Report of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) on the ASEAN Charter as one of the basis of the drafting of the ASEAN Charter together with our views and directives given at the 11th and 12th ASEAN Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 24: Asia and the Pacific, 1945-Present
    Asia and the Pacific 1945–Present Key Events As you read, look for the key events in the history of postwar Asia. • Communists in China introduced socialist measures and drastic reforms under the leadership of Mao Zedong. • After World War II, India gained its independence from Britain and divided into two separate countries—India and Pakistan. • Japan modernized its economy and society after 1945 and became one of the world’s economic giants. The Impact Today The events that occurred during this time period still impact our lives today. • Today China and Japan play significant roles in world affairs: China for political and military reasons, Japan for economic reasons. • India and Pakistan remain rivals. In 1998, India carried out nuclear tests and Pakistan responded by testing its own nuclear weapons. • Although the people of Taiwan favor independence, China remains committed to eventual unification. World History—Modern Times Video The Chapter 24 video, “Vietnam,” chronicles the history and impact of the Vietnam War. Mao Zedong 1949 1953 1965 Communist Korean Lyndon Johnson Party takes War sends U.S. troops over China ends to South Vietnam 1935 1945 1955 1965 1947 1966 India and Indira Gandhi Pakistan become elected independent prime minister nations of India Indira Gandhi 720 0720-0729 C24SE-860705 11/25/03 7:21 PM Page 721 Singapore’s architecture is a mixture of modern and colonial buildings. Nixon in China 1972 HISTORY U.S. President 1989 2002 Richard Nixon Tiananmen Square China joins World Trade visits China massacre Organization Chapter Overview Visit the Glencoe World History—Modern 1975 1985 1995 2005 Times Web site at wh.mt.glencoe.com and click on Chapter 24– Chapter Overview to 1979 1997 preview chapter information.
    [Show full text]
  • George C. Marshall and the “Europe-First” Strategy, 1939–1951: a Study in Diplomatic As Well As Military History 
    The 2015 George C. Marshall Lecture in Military History George C. Marshall and the “Europe-First” Strategy, 1939–1951: A Study in Diplomatic as well as Military History Mark A. Stoler* Abstract As Army chief of staff, secretary of state, and secretary of defense, George C. Marshall played a major role in creating, implementing, and defending the multilateral “Europe-First” global strategy that guided U.S. foreign and military policies through World War II and the Cold War. This lecture explores how and why he did so, emphasizing the decision to defeat Germany before Japan, the postwar European Re- covery Program that bears Marshall’s name, and the relief of General Douglas MacArthur during the Korean War for his refusal to accept this grand strategy. In the process it analyzes the complex relationship that exists between diplomatic and military history. he completion this year of the seventh and final volume of The Papers of George Catlett Marshall makes this an appropriate time for a Marshall lecture that focusesT on Marshall himself, specifically on the diplomatic as well as the military components of one of his fundamental strategic concepts. As a diplomatic as well as * This is a revised and expanded version of the Marshall lecture I delivered on 4 January 2015 at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association in New York. I am deeply grateful to Professors Melvyn Leffler, Barry Machado, and Allan Millett both for reading an earlier draft of this paper and for their suggestions for improvement. Final responsibility for its contents, however, rests solely with the author.
    [Show full text]
  • East Asia Summit Documents Series, 2005-2014
    East Asia Summit Documents Series 2005 Summit Documents Series Asia - 2014 East East Asia Summit Documents Series 2005-2014 www.asean.org ASEAN one vision @ASEAN one identity one community East Asia Summit (EAS) Documents Series 2005-2014 ASEAN Secretariat Jakarta The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established on 8 August 1967. The Member States of the Association are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. The ASEAN Secretariat is based in Jakarta, Indonesia. For inquiries, contact: The ASEAN Secretariat Public Outreach and Civil Society Division 70A Jalan Sisingamangaraja Jakarta 12110 Indonesia Phone : (62 21) 724-3372, 726-2991 Fax : (62 21) 739-8234, 724-3504 E-mail : [email protected] Catalogue-in-Publication Data East Asia Summit (EAS) Documents Series 2005-2014 Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, May 2015 327.59 1. A SEAN – East Asia 2. Declaration – Statement ISBN 978-602-0980-18-8 General information on ASEAN appears online at the ASEAN Website: www.asean.org The text of this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, provided proper acknowledgement is given and a copy containing the reprinted material is sent to Public Outreach and Civil Society Division of the ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta Copyright Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) 2015. All rights reserved 2 (DVW$VLD6XPPLW'RFXPHQWV6HULHV East Asia Summit Documents Series 2005-2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Summit and Ministerial Levels Documents) 2005 Summit Chairman’s Statement of the First East Asia Summit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14 December 2005 .................................................................................... 9 Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the East Asia Summit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14 December 2005 ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The United States and Japan in Asia
    MAY 2014 TADASHI YAMAMOTO MEMORIAL SEMINAR The United States and Japan in Asia April 28, 2014 The 2nd Tadashi YamamoTo Memorial Seminar, evolution of the region. As one Asian speaker noted, which was convened in Washington DC by the Council accepting the rise of China is increasingly difficult for on Foreign Relations and JCIE, brought together nearly its neighbors because China is too big and too power- 70 foreign policy specialists from the United States, ful. In response, a Chinese participant observed that Asia, and Europe to discuss the role of the US-Japan tensions are often aggravated by the tendency of those alliance in a changing Asia and the vision that key play- outside of China to become overly alarmed about its ers hold for the region’s future. However, speakers at expanding influence, betraying a propensity to see this meeting inevitably spent much of their time grap- China as an “incomprehensible alien” in a way that they pling with the question of why regional relations in would not characterize other countries. East Asia—and especially among the major powers of The bilateral tensions that have festered between Northeast Asia—have deteriorated so dramatically in China and Japan over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands recent years. were highlighted as one key example of how domes- One Japanese panelist identified three factors driv- tic politics and nationalism have rocked the region. ing regional tensions: the shifting power balance in Both Chinese and Japanese participants insisted that the region; a surge of nationalism in China, Japan, and influential policymakers on both sides want to put an Korea; and growing interdependence, which leaves cit- end to the vicious cycle of action and reaction that has izens in these three countries simultaneously more re- stoked regional tensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Make Us Choose: Southeast Asia in the Throes of US-China Rivalry
    THE NEW GEOPOLITICS OCTOBER 2019 ASIA DON’T MAKE US CHOOSE Southeast Asia in the throes of US-China rivalry JONATHAN STROMSETH DON’T MAKE US CHOOSE Southeast Asia in the throes of US-China rivalry JONATHAN STROMSETH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY U.S.-China rivalry has intensified significantly in Southeast Asia over the past year. This report chronicles the unfolding drama as it stretched across the major Asian summits in late 2018, the Second Belt and Road Forum in April 2019, the Shangri-La Dialogue in May-June, and the 34th summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in August. Focusing especially on geoeconomic aspects of U.S.-China competition, the report investigates the contending strategic visions of Washington and Beijing and closely examines the region’s response. In particular, it examines regional reactions to the Trump administration’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) strategy. FOIP singles out China for pursuing regional hegemony, says Beijing is leveraging “predatory economics” to coerce other nations, and poses a clear choice between “free” and “repressive” visions of world order in the Indo-Pacific region. China also presents a binary choice to Southeast Asia and almost certainly aims to create a sphere of influence through economic statecraft and military modernization. Many Southeast Asians are deeply worried about this possibility. Yet, what they are currently talking about isn’t China’s rising influence in the region, which they see as an inexorable trend that needs to be managed carefully, but the hard-edged rhetoric of the Trump administration that is casting the perception of a choice, even if that may not be the intent.
    [Show full text]
  • Involuntary Migrants, Political Revolutionaries and Economic Energisers: a History of the Image of Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia GORDON C
    Journal of Contemporary China (2005), 14(42), February, 55–66 Involuntary Migrants, Political Revolutionaries and Economic Energisers: a history of the image of overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia GORDON C. K. CHEUNG* Along the contemporary migration history of the overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia, three distinctive images have been constructed through the interaction between the overseas Chinese and Mainland China. First, the image of involuntary migrant, formulated by their migration activity and the continuous remittance they sent back to their hometowns, closely linked to the political and social-economic disturbances in the early years of the twentieth century. Second, the image of the overseas Chinese as political revolutionary was heavily politicised by the revolutionary policies of Mainland China in the 1950s and 1960s. Third, through the operational means of foreign direct investment, the overseas Chinese image of economic energiser was re-focused and mirror-imaged with the imperative of the economic reform of Mainland China in the 1970s and 1980s. On the one hand, the images of involuntary migrant, political revolutionary and economic energiser of the Southeast Asian overseas Chinese describe their situational status. On the other hand, these images also reflect the contemporary historical development of Mainland China. Whatever the reasons for studying the Overseas Chinese, there is no doubt that they are a bona fide object of research. The diversity of cultures represented by these people, the diversity of settings in which they have found themselves, the wide differences in the histories of specific Chinese ‘colonies’, all of these things make them a fascinating laboratory for social scientists of various disciplinary bents.1 In Southeast Asia the capitalists were the Chinese.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul D. Talcott Independent Scholar the Spread of Market Mechanisms
    Paul D. Talcott Mary Evelyn Tucker Independent Scholar Yale, Senior Lecturer and Senior Research Scholar The spread of market mechanisms in health care policy in Religion and ecology; Book Thomas Berry and the Arc of Japan and East Asia; the relationship between economic History (2019) development, democracy, and the introduction of market [email protected] principles into social insurance systems [email protected] Timothy J. Van Compernolle Amherst, Prof. of Japanese Wako Tawa The creative exchanges between literature and cinema in Amherst, Prof. of Asian Languages and Civilizations; interwar Japan Director of Language Study [email protected] Japanese grammar for learners of Japanese as a foreign language Floris van Swet [email protected] Northumbria, Postdoctoral Research Fellow Social and political consequences of attainder in early Elizabeth ten Grotenhuis Tokugawa Japan BU, Prof. Emerita for Japanese Art; [email protected] Received start-up grant to construct middle-school curriculum on immigration from China and Japan which she Elena Varshavskaya taught at Birches School Rhode Island School of Design, Senior Lecturer [email protected] ukiyo-e prints as historic documents [email protected] Sarah Thompson MFA, Curator of Japanese Art Alexander M. Vesey Japanese prints in the MFA collection, especially ukiyo-e Meiji Gakuin, Assoc. Prof. of Global & Transcultural Studies woodblock prints Early modern Japanese Buddhist social history [email protected] [email protected] R. Kenji Tierney James Keith Vincent SUNY New Paltz, Lecturer. of Anthropology BU, Assoc. Prof. of Japanese and Comparative Literature Sumo; Food; Globalization; Sports; The Body; Japan Natsume Soseki and Masaoka Shiki; haiku and the novel [email protected] [email protected] Maria Toyoda Louise E.
    [Show full text]
  • III. AEMI and ASEAN Energy Poverty
    III. AEMI and ASEAN Energy Poverty Adoracion Navarro,1 Maxensius Tri Sambodo2 and Jessie L. Todoc (lead)3 Abstract Based on available statistics, between 127 and 130 million people in South-East Asia lack access to electricity. At least 228 million still rely on traditional biomass for cooking, and lack access to clean and modern cooking facilities, with dire consequences for their quality of life and human development. Discussions for an integrated Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) energy market cannot overlook this energy poverty situation in the region. In fact, the overall goal of AEMI to achieve balanced and equitable economic growth and development for all countries in the region cannot be realized while people continue to suffer from energy poverty. This chapter maps the energy poverty situation in the region, and reviews the links between energy access and economic and human development. It also draws a connection between AEMI and the eradication of energy poverty or attaining universal energy access, in terms of benefits and strategies, particularly with regard to mapping investment requirements and taking inventory of financing options. The chapter concludes with some recommendations for near-term actions. A. Introduction The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines energy poverty as a lack of access to modern energy services, i.e., access to electricity and clean cooking facilities. Reddy and Reddy (1994) as cited in Masud and others (2007), said that energy poverty could be defined as “the absence of sufficient choice in assessing adequate, affordable, reliable, high-quality, safe and environmentally benign energy services to support economic and human development”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Acharya A. [1999], Realism, Institutionalism and the Asian Economic Crisis , “Contemporary Southeast Asia”, vol. 21, no. 1. Acharya A. [2002], Regionalism in the Emerging World Order: Sovereignty, Autonomy, Identity , in: New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy , eds S. Breslin, C. W. Hughes, N. Phillips, B. Rosamond, Routledge, London and New York. Acharya A. [2004], Democratization and the Prospects for Participatory Regionalism in Southeast Asia , in: Asian Regional Governance. Crisis and Change , eds K. Jayasuriya, RoutledgeCurzon, London and New York. Acharya A. [2009], The Strong in the World of the Weak: Southeast Asia in Asia’s Regional Architecture , in: Asia’s New Multilateralism. Cooperation, Competition, and the Search for Community , eds M. J. Green, B. Gill, Columbia University Press, New York. ACMECS [2010], ACMECS Plan of Action 2010–2012 , Adopted by the Leaders of the ACMECS Countries at the 4th ACMECS Summit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 17 November. ACMECS [2012], Objectives , http://www.acmecs.org ACMECS [2013], Vientiane Declaration of the Fifth Ayeyawady-Chao Phraya- Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy Summit , Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, 13 March. ACMECS [2015], Ayeyawaddy-Chao Phraya-Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy Plan of Action 2016–2018 , Adopted by the ACMECS Leaders at the 6th ACMECS Summit, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, 23 June. ADB [2010a], Institutions for Regional Integration. Toward an Asian Economic Community , Asian Development Bank, Metro Manila, Philippines. © The Author(s)
    [Show full text]
  • Japan-China Relations in East Asia: Rivals Or Partners? CHAPTER 6
    CHAPTER 6 Japan-China Relations in East Asia: Rivals or Partners? IIDA Masafumi Introduction Japan-China relations stand at a turning point. Antagonistic political relations with relatively stable economic relations between the two countries during the Koizumi administration have been improving and moving in the direction of establishing “mutually beneficial relations based on common strategic interests” since Koizumi’s successor Prime Minister Shinzo Abe paid a visit to Beijing and met Chinese President Hu Jintao in October 2006. Whether the improving relations between Tokyo and Beijing will continue to gather momentum for consolidation of their strategic relationship of mutual benefit or return to the path of deterioration is one of the significant factors affecting not only Japan’s security but the stability of East Asia. Chinese diplomacy towards Japan in the latest decade appears hostile and thorny from a bilateral point of view. However, observed from an East Asian regional perspective, China’s approach to Japan in the same period paints a different picture. As a matter of fact, the Chinese government made effort to maintain cooperative relations with Japan in East Asian multilateral frameworks while taking a tough stance on bilateral connections with Tokyo during Koizumi’s term of office. In this respect, multilateral structures for East Asian regional cooperation function as a stabilizer for a conflict- prone Japanese-Sino relationship. The purpose of this paper is to explore how the Chinese government considers its Japan policy in the context of its regional policy in East Asia. The future of a strategic relationship of mutual benefit between the two countries depends significantly on whether or not China’s East Asian policy will continue to play a role in stabilizing its bilateral relations with Japan.
    [Show full text]