DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY Acharya A. [1999], Realism, Institutionalism and the Asian Economic Crisis , “Contemporary Southeast Asia”, vol. 21, no. 1. Acharya A. [2002], Regionalism in the Emerging World Order: Sovereignty, Autonomy, Identity , in: New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy , eds S. Breslin, C. W. Hughes, N. Phillips, B. Rosamond, Routledge, London and New York. Acharya A. [2004], Democratization and the Prospects for Participatory Regionalism in Southeast Asia , in: Asian Regional Governance. Crisis and Change , eds K. Jayasuriya, RoutledgeCurzon, London and New York. Acharya A. [2009], The Strong in the World of the Weak: Southeast Asia in Asia’s Regional Architecture , in: Asia’s New Multilateralism. Cooperation, Competition, and the Search for Community , eds M. J. Green, B. Gill, Columbia University Press, New York. ACMECS [2010], ACMECS Plan of Action 2010–2012 , Adopted by the Leaders of the ACMECS Countries at the 4th ACMECS Summit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 17 November. ACMECS [2012], Objectives , http://www.acmecs.org ACMECS [2013], Vientiane Declaration of the Fifth Ayeyawady-Chao Phraya- Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy Summit , Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, 13 March. ACMECS [2015], Ayeyawaddy-Chao Phraya-Mekong Economic Cooperation Strategy Plan of Action 2016–2018 , Adopted by the ACMECS Leaders at the 6th ACMECS Summit, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, 23 June. ADB [2010a], Institutions for Regional Integration. Toward an Asian Economic Community , Asian Development Bank, Metro Manila, Philippines. © The Author(s) 2017 327 K. Klecha-Tylec, The Theoretical and Practical Dimensions of Regionalism in East Asia, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40262-8 328 BIBLIOGRAPHY ADB [2010b], Promoting Links and Improving Coordination Among the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), the Brunei Darussalam–Indonesia–Malaysia– Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA), the Indonesia–Malaysia– Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT), and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (Financed by the Government of Australia) , Technical Assistance Report, Project Number: 44175–01, Regional–Policy and Advisory Technical Assistance (R-PATA), December. ADB [2012], Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program: Overview. Economic Cooperation Program , Asian Development Bank, Metro Manila, Philippines. Airport Council International [2015], http://www.aci.aero Akrasanee N., Tambunlertchai S. [1992], Government and Private Sector Relations in ASEAN Economic Co-operation , in: The ASEAN Reader , eds K. S. Sandhu, C. Chandran, A. Rajah, J. L. H. Tan, P. Thambipillai, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore. Amin S. [1999], Regionalization in Response to Polarizing Globalization , in: Globalism and the New Regionalism , eds B. Hettne, A. Inotai, O. Sunkel, Palgrave Macmillan, London. Ando M. [2006], Fragmentation and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade in East Asia , “North American Journal of Economics and Finance”, vol. 17. Ando M. [2009], Impacts of FTAs in East Asia: CGE Simulation Analysis , RIETI Discussion Paper Series 09-E -037, The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, July. Ando M., Kimura F. [2005], The Formation of International Production and Distribution Networks in East Asia , in: International Trade in East Asia , eds T. Ito, A. K. Rose, Volume 14, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER- East Asia Seminar on Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. Anwar D. F. [1994], Indonesia in ASEAN. Foreign Policy and Regionalism , Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore. APT [1999], Joint Statement on East Asia Cooperation , Manila, Philippines, 28 November. APT [2001], Towards an East Asian Community. Region of Peace, Prosperity and Progress , East Asian Vision Group Report, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. APT [2002], Final Report of the East Asia Study Group , ASEAN+3 Summit, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 4 November. APT [2004], Chairman’s Statement of the 8th ASEAN + 3 Summit. “Strengthening ASEAN + 3 Cooperation” , Vientiane, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, 29 November. APT [2005a], Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12 December. BIBLIOGRAPHY 329 APT [2005b], Chairman’s Statement of the Ninth ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12 December. APT [2007a], Chairman’s Statement of the Tenth ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Cebu, Philippines, 14 January. APT [2007b], Second Joint Statement on East Asia Cooperation. Building on the Foundations of ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation , Singapore, 20 November. APT [2007c], ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation Work Plan 2007–2017 , Singapore, 20 November. APT [2009a], Chairman’s Statement of the 12th ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Cha-am Hua Hin, Thailand, 24 October. APT [2009b], Cha-am Hua Hin Statement on ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation on Food Security and Bio-Energy Development , Cha-am Hua Hin, Thailand, 24 October. APT [2010a], Chairman’s statement of the 13th ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Ha Noi, Vietnam, 29 October. APT [2010b], Luang Prabang Joint Declaration on ASEAN Plus Three Civil Service Cooperation , Luang Prabang, Laos, 29 October. APT [2011], Chairman’s Statement of the 14th ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Bali, Indonesia, 18 November. APT [2012a], ASEAN Plus Three Leaders’ Joint Statement on the Commemoration of the 15th Anniversary of the ASEAN Plus Three Cooperation , Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 19 November. APT [2012b], Leaders’ Statement on ASEAN Plus Three Partnership on Connectivity , Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 19 November. APT [2013], Chairman’s Statement of the 16th ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam, 10 October. APT [2014], Chairman’s Statement of the 17th ASEAN Plus Three Summit , Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, 13 November. ASEAN [1967], Bangkok Declaration , Bangkok, Thailand, 8 August. ASEAN [1976], Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia , Jakarta, Indonesia, 24 February. ASEAN [1995], Opening Statement His Excellency Mr. Goh Chok Tong Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore , Bangkok, Thailand, 14 December. ASEAN [1997], ASEAN Economic Co-Operation. Transition & Transformation , ASEAN Secretariat, Institute of Southeast Asian, Singapore. ASEAN [2000a], e-ASEAN Framework Agreement , Singapore, 24 November. ASEAN [2000b], Press Statement by Chairman , The Fourth ASEAN Informal Summit, Singapore, 25 November. ASEAN [2001], Ha Noi Declaration On Narrowing Development Gap For Closer ASEAN Integration , Hanoi, Vietnam, 23 July. ASEAN [2002a], Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Co-Operation Between ASEAN and the People’s Republic of China , Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 4 November. 330 BIBLIOGRAPHY ASEAN [2002b], Press Statement by the Chairman of the 8th ASEAN Summit , the 6th ASEAN + 3 Summit and the ASEAN-China Summit , Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 4 November. ASEAN [2002c], Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Co-Operation Between ASEAN and the People’s Republic of China , Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 4 November. ASEAN [2002d], Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea , Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 4 November. ASEAN [2003], Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II) , Bali, Indonesia, 7 October. ASEAN [2004], Vientiane Action Programme , Tenth ASEAN Summit, Vientiane, Laos, 29–30 November. ASEAN [2005], Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the Establishment of the ASEAN Charter , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12 December. ASEAN [2007a], Cebu Declaration on the Acceleration of the Establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015 , 13 January. ASEAN [2007b], Cebu Declaration on the Blueprint of the ASEAN Charter , Cebu, Philippines, 13 January. ASEAN [2007c], Cebu Declaration Towards One Caring and Sharing Community , Cebu, Philippines, 13 January. ASEAN [2007d], ASEAN Declaration on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Migrant Workers , Cebu, Philippines, 13 January. ASEAN [2008a], The ASEAN Charter , ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta, Indonesia, January. ASEAN [2008b], Declaration on the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint , ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta, Indonesia, January. ASEAN [2009a], ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint , ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta, Indonesia, June. ASEAN [2009b], ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint , ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta, Indonesia, June. ASEAN [2009c], Initiative for ASEAN Integration (IAI) Strategic Framework and IAI Work Plan 2 (2009–2015) , Cha-am, Thailand, 26 February–1 March. ASEAN [2009d], ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement , Cha-am, Thailand, 26 February. ASEAN [2009e], ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement , Cha-am, Thailand, 26 February. ASEAN [2009f], Cha-am Hua Hin Declaration on Strengthening Cooperation on Education to Achieve an ASEAN Caring and Sharing Community , Cha-am Hua Hin, Thailand, 24 October. ASEAN [2010], Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity , ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta, Indonesia, December. ASEAN [2011a], ASEAN Leaders’ Joint Statement on the ASEAN Community in a Global Community of Nations , Jakarta, Indonesia, 8 May. BIBLIOGRAPHY 331 ASEAN [2011b], ASEAN Leaders’ Joint Statement in Enhancing Cooperation against Traffi cking in Persons in Southeast Asia , Jakarta, Indonesia, 8 May. ASEAN [2011c], ASEAN Leaders’ Statement on Cooperation in Flood Prevention, Mitigation, Relief, Recovery and Rehabilitation , Bali, Indonesia, 17 November. ASEAN [2011d], Bali Declaration on ASEAN Community in a Global Community of Nations, “Bali Concord III” , Bali, Indonesia, 17 November. ASEAN [2012a], Phnom Penh Declaration on ASEAN: One Community, One Destiny , Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 3 April. ASEAN [2012b], Phnom
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working with Brunei to Get the Rebalance Right
    Working with Brunei to Get the Rebalance Right Daniel L. Shields United States Ambassador to Brunei Darussalam hen President Obama delivered his address to the Australian Parliament in 2011 affirming his strategic decision that the United States will play a Wlarger role in shaping the Asia Pacific region and its future—what came to be called the rebalance—few observers outside Brunei Darussalam might have antici- pated that Brunei would emerge as an essential partner for the United States in the effort to get the rebalance right. But that is what happened. The United States worked closely with Brunei, especially in the context of Brunei’s role as the 2013 Chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), to develop innovative projects to promote comprehen- sive American regional engagement. Two important examples of initiatives to broaden US regional engagement were the Brunei-US English Language Enrichment Project for ASEAN and the US-Asia Pacific Comprehensive Energy Partnership. As these projects were being implemented, Brunei’s effective Chairmanship of ASEAN helped lower the temperature in the region on the South China Sea and promote broad regional military-to- military cooperation, particularly through a Brunei-hosted Humanitarian Assistance/ Disaster Relief and Military Medicine exercise that brought together 18 nations, including the United States and China. The rebalance also includes a commercial side, and US companies have enjoyed increased success in Brunei. Looking ahead, the opportunities for trade should multiply once the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, in which Brunei and the United States are among the twelve parties, come to a successful conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States
    Order Code RL32688 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Updated April 4, 2006 Bruce Vaughn (Coordinator) Analyst in Southeast and South Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Wayne M. Morrison Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress China-Southeast Asia Relations: Trends, Issues, and Implications for the United States Summary Southeast Asia has been considered by some to be a region of relatively low priority in U.S. foreign and security policy. The war against terror has changed that and brought renewed U.S. attention to Southeast Asia, especially to countries afflicted by Islamic radicalism. To some, this renewed focus, driven by the war against terror, has come at the expense of attention to other key regional issues such as China’s rapidly expanding engagement with the region. Some fear that rising Chinese influence in Southeast Asia has come at the expense of U.S. ties with the region, while others view Beijing’s increasing regional influence as largely a natural consequence of China’s economic dynamism. China’s developing relationship with Southeast Asia is undergoing a significant shift. This will likely have implications for United States’ interests in the region. While the United States has been focused on Iraq and Afghanistan, China has been evolving its external engagement with its neighbors, particularly in Southeast Asia. In the 1990s, China was perceived as a threat to its Southeast Asian neighbors in part due to its conflicting territorial claims over the South China Sea and past support of communist insurgency.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman´S Statement of the 12Th ASEAN Summit
    Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2007 Departamento de Asia y Pacífico Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Chairperson’s Statement of the 12th ASEAN Summit H.E. the President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. “ONE CARING AND SHARING COMMUNITY” Cebu, Philippines,13 January 2007 We, the Heads of State and/or Government of ASEAN Member Countries, had a very productive 12th ASEAN Summit Meeting, on 13 January 2007 in Cebu, Philippines. We exchanged views on regional and international developments, focusing on how we may deepen ASEAN integration to better foster the region’s sustainable development, stability, security and prosperity for the benefit of all our peoples. We resolved to uphold the centrality of ASEAN and to enhance its standing as an effective driving force for regional initiatives and collective responses to the challenges and opportunities facing our region, countries and peoples. We stressed that the ASEAN community we are building shall be a community of peoples caring for and sharing their human, natural and cultural resources and strengths for their common good and mutual benefit. Cebu Declaration on the Blueprint of the ASEAN Charter We recognized that ASEAN must manage the key challenges of regional integration, globalization, economic growth and new technologies. In doing so, we acknowledged that ASEAN must remain cohesive with strong institutions and responsive policies for regional community building. To help realize this vision, we signed the Cebu Declaration on the Blueprint of the ASEAN Charter to endorse the Report of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) on the ASEAN Charter as one of the basis of the drafting of the ASEAN Charter together with our views and directives given at the 11th and 12th ASEAN Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM)
    LES CAHIERS EUROPEENS DE SCIENCES PO. > N° 04/2006 The Rise and Decline of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Assymmetric Bilateralism and the Limitations of Interregionalism > David Camroux D. Camroux – The Rise and Decline of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po. n° 04/2006 DAVID CAMROUX The Rise and Decline of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): Assymmetric Bilateralism and the Limitations of Interregionalism1 David Camroux is Senior Research Associate at CERI-Sciences Po. Citation : David Camroux (2006), “The Rise and Decline of the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM): Assymmetric Bilateralism and the Limitations of Interregionalism”, Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po, n° 04. 1 This is a significantly revised and much updated version of a previous article « Contemporary EU-East Asian Relations : An Assessment of the ASEM Process » in R.K. Jain (ed.) The European Union in a Changing World, New Delhi, Radiant Publishers, 2002, pp. 142-165. One of the problems in the analysis of ASEM is that many of the observers, including this author, are also participants, albeit minor ones, in the process by dint of their involvement in ASEM’s two track activities. This engenders both a problem of maintaining a critical distance and, also, an understandable tendency to give value to an object of research, in which one has invested so much time and energy and which provides so many opportunities for travel and networking between Europe and Asia. Such is the creative tension within which observers of ASEM are required to function Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po. – n° 04/2006 Abstract East Asia’s economic dynamism attracted the attention of European political leaders in the 1980s leading to the publication of Asian strategy papers by most European governments.
    [Show full text]
  • East Asia Summit Documents Series, 2005-2014
    East Asia Summit Documents Series 2005 Summit Documents Series Asia - 2014 East East Asia Summit Documents Series 2005-2014 www.asean.org ASEAN one vision @ASEAN one identity one community East Asia Summit (EAS) Documents Series 2005-2014 ASEAN Secretariat Jakarta The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established on 8 August 1967. The Member States of the Association are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. The ASEAN Secretariat is based in Jakarta, Indonesia. For inquiries, contact: The ASEAN Secretariat Public Outreach and Civil Society Division 70A Jalan Sisingamangaraja Jakarta 12110 Indonesia Phone : (62 21) 724-3372, 726-2991 Fax : (62 21) 739-8234, 724-3504 E-mail : [email protected] Catalogue-in-Publication Data East Asia Summit (EAS) Documents Series 2005-2014 Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, May 2015 327.59 1. A SEAN – East Asia 2. Declaration – Statement ISBN 978-602-0980-18-8 General information on ASEAN appears online at the ASEAN Website: www.asean.org The text of this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, provided proper acknowledgement is given and a copy containing the reprinted material is sent to Public Outreach and Civil Society Division of the ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta Copyright Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) 2015. All rights reserved 2 (DVW$VLD6XPPLW'RFXPHQWV6HULHV East Asia Summit Documents Series 2005-2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Summit and Ministerial Levels Documents) 2005 Summit Chairman’s Statement of the First East Asia Summit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14 December 2005 .................................................................................... 9 Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the East Asia Summit, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 14 December 2005 ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final JOINT MINISTERIAL STATEMENT of the 13Th EAST ASIA SUMMIT ENERGY MINISTERS MEETING 05 September 2019, Bangkok, Thailand 1
    Final JOINT MINISTERIAL STATEMENT OF THE 13th EAST ASIA SUMMIT ENERGY MINISTERS MEETING 05 September 2019, Bangkok, Thailand 1. The Thirteenth East Asia Summit Energy Ministers Meeting (13th EAS EMM) was held on 05 September 2019 in Bangkok, Thailand. The Meeting was chaired by H.E. Sontirat Sontijirawong, Minister of Energy of Thailand. The Meeting was attended by the Ministers and Senior Officials responsible for energy from the EAS participating countries, namely the ASEAN Member States, Australia, the People’s Republic of China, Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), New Zealand, the Russian Federation, and the United States of America. The Deputy Secretary-General of ASEAN was also in attendance. 2. The EAS region drives global energy demand and is expected to continue to do so in the long-term. This underlines the continuing imperative for the region to strengthen its partnerships and innovation ecosystems to enable sustainable energy transitions that adequately meet the needs of its peoples. The Meeting discussed the progress of EAS energy cooperation against this background and were pleased to note the deepening cooperation and concrete initiatives that have been implemented and proposed since the last meeting of the EAS EMM. 3. In particular, the Ministers discussed the progress of activities implemented by the three (3) Work Streams of the EAS Energy Cooperation Task Force (ECTF) and noted with appreciation the expanded range of fuels and technologies covered in the current regional initiatives. The ongoing and new initiatives include energy efficiency technologies, distributed energy systems, next generation biofuels, solar PVs and energy storage solutions, wind power technology, promotion of natural gas, mobility decarbonisation, carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), carbon recycling and hydrogen technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Don't Make Us Choose: Southeast Asia in the Throes of US-China Rivalry
    THE NEW GEOPOLITICS OCTOBER 2019 ASIA DON’T MAKE US CHOOSE Southeast Asia in the throes of US-China rivalry JONATHAN STROMSETH DON’T MAKE US CHOOSE Southeast Asia in the throes of US-China rivalry JONATHAN STROMSETH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY U.S.-China rivalry has intensified significantly in Southeast Asia over the past year. This report chronicles the unfolding drama as it stretched across the major Asian summits in late 2018, the Second Belt and Road Forum in April 2019, the Shangri-La Dialogue in May-June, and the 34th summit of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in August. Focusing especially on geoeconomic aspects of U.S.-China competition, the report investigates the contending strategic visions of Washington and Beijing and closely examines the region’s response. In particular, it examines regional reactions to the Trump administration’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) strategy. FOIP singles out China for pursuing regional hegemony, says Beijing is leveraging “predatory economics” to coerce other nations, and poses a clear choice between “free” and “repressive” visions of world order in the Indo-Pacific region. China also presents a binary choice to Southeast Asia and almost certainly aims to create a sphere of influence through economic statecraft and military modernization. Many Southeast Asians are deeply worried about this possibility. Yet, what they are currently talking about isn’t China’s rising influence in the region, which they see as an inexorable trend that needs to be managed carefully, but the hard-edged rhetoric of the Trump administration that is casting the perception of a choice, even if that may not be the intent.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairmans Statement of 8Th East Asia Summit
    FINAL CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT OF THE 8TH EAST ASIA SUMMIT 10 October 2013 Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam 1. The 8th East Asia Summit (EAS) was held on 10 October 2013 in Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. The Summit was chaired by His Majesty Sultan Haji Hassanal Bolkiah, the Sultan and Yang Di-Pertuan of Brunei Darussalam. The Summit was attended by the Heads of State/Government of ASEAN Member States, Australia, the People’s Republic of China, the Republic of India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, the Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation and the Secretary of State of the United States of America. 2. We reaffirmed our commitment to the 2005 Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the Establishment of the EAS, the 2010 Ha Noi Declaration on the Commemoration of the 5th Anniversary of the EAS and the 2011 Declaration of the EAS on the Principles for Mutually Beneficial Relations, which emphasised the role of the EAS as a Leaders-led forum for strategic dialogue and cooperation on political, security and economic issues of common regional concern with the aim to promote peace, stability and economic prosperity in East Asia. 3. We further reaffirmed ASEAN’s central role in the EAS, and ASEAN’s commitment to work in close partnership with all EAS participating countries, to ensure that the EAS would continue to be an important integral component of the regional architecture. 4. We exchanged views on regional and international issues, including food and energy security, climate change, sustainable development and disaster management, as well as the future direction of the EAS.
    [Show full text]
  • III. AEMI and ASEAN Energy Poverty
    III. AEMI and ASEAN Energy Poverty Adoracion Navarro,1 Maxensius Tri Sambodo2 and Jessie L. Todoc (lead)3 Abstract Based on available statistics, between 127 and 130 million people in South-East Asia lack access to electricity. At least 228 million still rely on traditional biomass for cooking, and lack access to clean and modern cooking facilities, with dire consequences for their quality of life and human development. Discussions for an integrated Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) energy market cannot overlook this energy poverty situation in the region. In fact, the overall goal of AEMI to achieve balanced and equitable economic growth and development for all countries in the region cannot be realized while people continue to suffer from energy poverty. This chapter maps the energy poverty situation in the region, and reviews the links between energy access and economic and human development. It also draws a connection between AEMI and the eradication of energy poverty or attaining universal energy access, in terms of benefits and strategies, particularly with regard to mapping investment requirements and taking inventory of financing options. The chapter concludes with some recommendations for near-term actions. A. Introduction The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines energy poverty as a lack of access to modern energy services, i.e., access to electricity and clean cooking facilities. Reddy and Reddy (1994) as cited in Masud and others (2007), said that energy poverty could be defined as “the absence of sufficient choice in assessing adequate, affordable, reliable, high-quality, safe and environmentally benign energy services to support economic and human development”.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan-China Relations in East Asia: Rivals Or Partners? CHAPTER 6
    CHAPTER 6 Japan-China Relations in East Asia: Rivals or Partners? IIDA Masafumi Introduction Japan-China relations stand at a turning point. Antagonistic political relations with relatively stable economic relations between the two countries during the Koizumi administration have been improving and moving in the direction of establishing “mutually beneficial relations based on common strategic interests” since Koizumi’s successor Prime Minister Shinzo Abe paid a visit to Beijing and met Chinese President Hu Jintao in October 2006. Whether the improving relations between Tokyo and Beijing will continue to gather momentum for consolidation of their strategic relationship of mutual benefit or return to the path of deterioration is one of the significant factors affecting not only Japan’s security but the stability of East Asia. Chinese diplomacy towards Japan in the latest decade appears hostile and thorny from a bilateral point of view. However, observed from an East Asian regional perspective, China’s approach to Japan in the same period paints a different picture. As a matter of fact, the Chinese government made effort to maintain cooperative relations with Japan in East Asian multilateral frameworks while taking a tough stance on bilateral connections with Tokyo during Koizumi’s term of office. In this respect, multilateral structures for East Asian regional cooperation function as a stabilizer for a conflict- prone Japanese-Sino relationship. The purpose of this paper is to explore how the Chinese government considers its Japan policy in the context of its regional policy in East Asia. The future of a strategic relationship of mutual benefit between the two countries depends significantly on whether or not China’s East Asian policy will continue to play a role in stabilizing its bilateral relations with Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATE CHINA-ASEAN ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION CENTER (CAEC) February, 2011 Issue 2
    UPDATE CHINA-ASEAN ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION CENTER (CAEC) February, 2011 Issue 2 【ASEAN-China Cooperation Activities】 Ninth ASEAN Plus Three Environment Ministerial Meeting The Ninth ASEAN Plus Three Environment Ministerial Meeting was held on 14 October 2010 in Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. The environment ministerial officials from ASEAN Member States (AMS), China, Japan and Republic of Korea as well as the Deputy Secretary General of ASEAN Secretariat attended the meeting. The Ninth ASEAN Plus Three Environment Ministerial Meeting reviewed existing cooperation and put forward proposals for cooperation between the ASEAN and its three partners in the environment field. The Chinese delegation presented the progress of environmental cooperation between China and ASEAN, including the establishment of China-ASEAN Environmental Cooperation Center and the implementation of China-ASEAN Strategy on Environmental Protection Cooperation. Second East Asia Summit (EAS) Environment Ministerial Meeting On 15 October 2010, the Second East Asia Summit (EAS) Environment Ministerial Meeting was held in Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam. The environment ministerial officials from ASEAN Member States (AMS), China, Japan, Republic of Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the Deputy Secretary General of ASEAN Secretariat attended the meeting. The Second East Asia Summit (EAS) Environment Ministerial Meeting adopted the Ministerial Statement of the Second East Asia Summit (EAS) Environment Ministerial Meeting, and proposed to
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing the Wider East Asia Region
    ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration Organizing the Wider East Asia Region Christopher M. Dent No. 62 | November 2010 ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration Organizing the Wider East Asia Region Christopher M. Dent+ This is a background paper prepared for the ADB flagship study “Institutions for Regionalism: Enhancing No. 62 November 2010 Cooperation and Integration in Asia and the Pacific,” under technical assistance project no. 7284. +Christopher M. Dent is Professor of East Asia’s International Political Economy, Department of East Asian Studies, and White Rose East Asia Centre (WREAC), Rm 116, 14-20 Cromer Terrace, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Tel +44 113 343 6470, Fax +44 113 343 6808, [email protected] The ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration focuses on topics relating to regional cooperation and integration in the areas of infrastructure and software, trade and investment, money and finance, and regional public goods. The Series is a quick-disseminating, informal publication that seeks to provide information, generate discussion, and elicit comments. Working papers published under this Series may subsequently be published elsewhere. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term ―country‖ in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]