Diplomarbeit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Diplomarbeit Titel der Diplomarbeit Sinhalese Nationalism and its interrelation with Identity, Peace and Conflict Verfasserin Nisansala Sirimalwatta angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. Phil.) Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 057 390 Studienrichtung lt. Zulassungsbescheid: Internationale Entwicklung Betreuer: Dr. Wilfried Graf Wien, im März, 2009 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 I INTRODUCTION 4 1 Epistemic interest 4 2 Methodology 6 II INTRODUCTION INTO A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 8 1 Nationalism: Approaching a Holistic Framework of Understanding 10 2 The Cultural Dimension of Nationalism 11 2.1 Print Capitalism and Promoting Nationalism: Spreading 13 a ‘Social Construction’ 3 Structural Dimension of Nationalism 14 4 The Agent/Agency − Dimension of Nationalism 16 4.1 Defining National Identity 16 4.2 Ethnic Heritage and Nationalism 17 4.3 Educating Consensus 18 4.4 The Functions and Meanings of National Identity 19 5 The Non-Western Conception of the Nation 20 6 Discourses on Nationalism and Identity 22 7 Conclusion 24 III LAYING THE FOUNDATIONS FOR MODERN 26 SINHALESE NATIONALISM IN CEYLON 1 Sinhalese Societal Structure in the Eighteenth Century 27 2 Structural Changes through British Colonialism 28 2.1 State and Religion in Ceylon 31 3 Cultural Changes: Religious Revival as Precursor for Nationalism 32 3.1 Arrival of Print Capitalism and the Formation of 32 ‘Protestant Buddhism’ 4 Anagarika Dharmapala as an Agent of Early Sinhalese Nationalism 35 5 The Temperance Movement and the Anti-Moors Riots of 1915: 37 Two Examples of Arousing Nationalist Sentiments 6 Agents of Change: National Identity and the Role of the 41 Ceylonese Elites 6.1 English and Vernacular Education 41 6.2 The Elite in Colombo and its Notions of Nationalism 42 6.2.1 Communal versus Universal 44 7 Post-Orientalist Identity Discourse in Ceylon 46 7.1 The Invention of Modern Ethnic Identities 47 7.2 Colonial Census in Ceylon 48 7.3 The Introduction of the Aryan Theory 52 7.4 The Pali-Chronicles: The Role of Religious Mythology 53 8 Conclusion 55 »» 1 IV HISTORY OF IDENTITIES IN POSTCOLONIAL SRI LANKA 58 1 Majority Politics: Consolidating Nationalist Values 58 2 Constitutional Developments: Framing Identity and Discrimination 62 3 Influencing the Socio-Cultural Perception: Obstacles to Inter-Ethnic 63 Accommodations 4 The Rise and Success of Sinhala Nationalism 67 4.1 Creating Unity and Empowering the Sinhalese Masses 67 4.2 Sinhala Nationalising the State 70 5 The Janatha Vikmuthi Peramuna: Insurrection in the 73 Name of a Sinhala Nation 5.1 Socioeconomic Stimulation for Sinhala Nationalism 78 6 The Role of Elites and the Masses 81 7 Cultural Production through the State: Education and Media 83 8 The Rise of the Tamil Tigers 85 Black July: the Anti-Tamil Pogrom of 1983 88 9 Conclusion 91 V SINHALESE NATIONALISM − IDENTITY , CONFLICT 96 AND PEACE IN PRESENT -DAY SRI LANKA 1 Three Gaps in Peacebuilding 97 1.1 The Interdependence Gap 97 1.2 The Justice Gap 98 1.3 The Process-Structure Gap 99 1.4 The Authenticity Gap 99 2 The Sri Lankan Peace Process in Brief 100 Excursion: Tsunami, Peace and Sinhalese Nationalism 102 3 Gaps in the Sri Lankan Peace Initiatives 103 4 Exploring Perceptions of Rural Sinhalese Youth: 106 Introspective Thoughts 4.1 Methodological Choice 108 4.2 Participants 108 4.3 Procedure 109 4.4 Picturing My Own Experiences and Thoughts on 110 Interviewing Rural Sinhalese Young Adults 4.4.1 Sinhalese are Very Hospitable People, Smiling and Friendly 111 5 Conclusion: Peaceful National Identities 120 VI SOURCES 126 VII APPENDIX − Questions for the interview 134 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG (139) − SUMMARY (141) 139 CURRICULUM VITAE 143 »» 2 Acknowledgments The writing of my thesis has benefited enormously from the support of my fam- ily, friends and members of the Institute for Integrative Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding. I want to thank my academic advisor Wilfried Graf for help- ing me to conceptualize my work and putting my ideas straight, Gudrun Kramer for sharing her profound knowledge on Sri Lankan politics and conflict, as well as Augustin Nicolescou for discussions on current developments in Sri Lanka. I want to express gratitude towards my family who supported me in various ways during this one year of writing. This work would not be possible without the help and assistance of my father who never got tired debating about Sri Lankan politics. Even though sometimes contrary in our views, I would not have been able to get such insights into Sri Lanka without his knowledgeable and intellectual guidance. He clearly verified and contextualized a lot of my informa- tion. Furthermore I want to thank my mother and my brother for counterbalanc- ing heated discussions on Sri Lankan politics and being so supportive. Concerning methodological questions I want to give special thanks to Tamara Neubauer, whom I could bother at almost any given time with problems arising out of my research, as well as Maria Husinsky and Natalie Plhak for reading and criticizing my theoretical framework. I am grateful for the versatile help of Shankar Nath. Besides loyally supporting me and encouraging me to carry out my research, he as a fellow aspiring re- searcher on South Asia provided me with relevant intellectual inputs to shape my work for the better. Finally I would like to thank all Sri Lankans who took the time to talk with me and answer my questions, without their openness and eagerness to explain I wouldn’t have been able to comprehend the manifold dimensions of Sri Lankan society at large. »» 3 I Introduction 1 Epistemic Interest The topic of national identity is highly complex and very difficult to grasp, yet every one is affected by it in some way. The reason why I chose to work on na- tionalism in Sri Lanka in general and Sinhalese nationalism in particular lies without a doubt in my own Sinhalese origin. During my studies of International Development in Vienna I started to realise that the country from which I came is a country haunted by violence and conflict, where minorities claim to be op- pressed and extremely violated by the majority. I come from the Sinhalese ma- jority. Western media and Western literature enhanced this view, sometimes calling the Sri Lankan government Sinhala chauvinist or supremacist. On the other side, I was confronted in my every day life with Sinhalese people, none of who seemed to me to be chauvinistic or racist. To the contrary, I actually found that they were the most friendly and hospitable people I had ever met. Thus, I was confused and deeply irritated by the huge gap in my knowledge and under- standing. How was it that I had no idea about the conflict or how somebody could call Sinhalese people ‘racist’, ‘chauvinist’ or ‘oppressors’? In fact, I started my quest by asking my family questions about Sri Lankan his- tory and about the reason why my father decided to leave the country. As many children of South Asian expatriates know, topics like this are not frequently dis- cussed; it took me a lot of time and patience to reach the core of the matter, but understanding Sri Lankan history and culture became a matter of my own pend- ing identity. At first my view and perception was blurred by the violent attacks of the Libera- tion Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), all the more so as there where only Sin- halese people there to explain the conflict to me; the only thing they could offer was their one-sided perception, mainly enriched by descriptions of LTTE atroci- ties. To my naive question as to why they were fighting a guerrilla war against the state, their only response was, “Because they want a separate state.” If I »» 4 asked further questions I would only be met by a yawning void. It was obvious that there was something missing in their explanations. Thus, I started reading; and the first thing one encounters while focusing on the Sinhala-Tamil divide is the year 1983: the year I was born and the year that marked the outbreak of the Sri Lankan conflict that caused extreme human suffering. The anti-Tamil pogrom of 1983 was the extreme violent and perverted manifes- tation of feelings and actions canalized and instrumentalized by Sinhalese na- tionalist agitators. During this ‘Black July’ I was an unborn child in my mother’s womb, who was at that time in Colombo visiting my grandparents. My mother described this event to me, and told me how Colombo was suddenly filled with gangs of rural Sinhalese that even came to my grandparent’s house and asked if they would hide any Tamil and told them that if they did, they would burn us all alive. Luckily they did not come in, and even luckier for the Tamil family my grandfather was hiding in his old unused wedding hall. Nevertheless, this year marks the rise of a tragic play whose main actors are the people guided by false nationalism, whether it be the Sinhalese version or the Tamil one. Thus I finally was given insight into my first question of why some people call Sinhalese oppressors, chauvinists or racist. At the same time it appeared to me that this issue was far too precarious and complex to simply brand it as Sin- halese chauvinism. It needed to be approached with care and sensitivity, most of all with understanding, but at the same time without trying to legitimise the violence connected to it. The next task for me was to understand how it had reached this point. This part was not as easy to ascertain and I am still not sure if it is possible for anyone to determine how events can go so astray that humans become capable of killing each other.