DOCSLIB.ORG

APPLICANT: the A2 Milk Company

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPLICANT: the A2 Milk Company Item ____LPP03_______ - REPORTS -______1/07/2020_________ NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL REPORTS NSLPP MEETING HELD ON 1/7/2020 Attachments: 1. Site plan 2. Architectural Plans 3. Clause 4.6 statement ADDRESS/WARD: 182-186 Blues Point Road, McMahons Point (W) APPLICATION No: DA 82/20 PROPOSAL: Fit out on Levels 3 and 4 and associated works including an interconnecting staircase PLANS REF: Plan No. Issue Date Title Drawn by Received L03-A099 B 29.11.2019 RCP demolition plan level 03 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L03-A100 B 29.11.2019 Demolition plan level 03 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L03-A101 C4 26.03.2020 Partition plan level 03 Futurespace 25/052020 L03-A102 C 29.11.2019 Reflected ceiling plan level 03 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L03-A103 C 29.11.2019 Furniture & joinery plan level 03 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L03-A104 A 29.11.2019 Finishes plan level 03 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L04-A099 B 29.11.2019 RCP demolition plan level 04 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L04-A100 B 29.11.2019 Demolition plan level 04 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L04-A101 C3 26.03.2020 Partition plan level 04 Futurespace 25/052020 L04-A102 C 29.11.2019 Reflected ceiling plan level 04 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L04-A103 C 29.11.2019 Furniture & joinery plan level 04 Futurespace 15/04/2020 L04-A104 A 29.11.2019 Finishes plan level 04 Futurespace 15/04/2020 A700 A 02.12.2019 Levels 03- 04 stair Futurespace 25/052020 A701 A 02.12.2019 Levels 03- 04 stair Futurespace 25/052020 A702 A 02.12.2019 Levels 03- 04 stair Futurespace 25/052020 OWNER: APPLICANT: The A2 Milk Company AUTHOR: David Hoy, Team Leader Assessments DATE OF REPORT: 11 June 2020 DATE LODGED: 15 April 2020 AMENDED: 25 May 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Approval Report of David Hoy, Team Leader Assessments Page 2 Re: 182-186 Blues Point Road, McMahons Point EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This development application seeks approval for fit out on Levels 3 and 4, and associated works including an interconnecting staircase, in an existing heritage listed commercial building. The application is reported to the North Sydney Local Planning Panel for determination as the site is subject to an 8.5m building height development standard pursuant to Clause 4.3 of North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, however the proposed works, at 17.49m in height, exceed this standard by greater than 10%. The owners of adjoining properties were notified of the proposed development for a 14-day period in accordance with Council’s Community Engagement Protocol. The notification resulted in no submissions. The assessment has considered the performance of the application against Council’s planning requirements. The application proposes internal works including fitout works and installation of new stairs between Levels 3 & 4. The proposal does not affect the external form or heritage significance of the building. There are no unreasonable impacts to neighbours' views, sun, privacy or amenity. There are no unreasonable impacts to the street or local area. A request to vary the Building Height development standard has been submitted pursuant to Clause 4.6 of NSLEP 2013 and assessed to be justifiable in the circumstances of the case and well founded on planning grounds. The proposal is within the existing building height and envelope and will not give rise to any additional breaches or increase in development yield. The variation is thus considered technical in nature. Following this assessment the development application is considered to be reasonable in the circumstances and is recommended for approval subject to conditions. Re: 182-186 Blues Point Road, McMahons Point - DA 82/20 Page 3 LOCATION MAP P 2 5 t 2 2 1 A 5 0 S 80 1 / 1 T 8 6 3 2 0 R 1 1 3 6 / 03 82 2 1 E 7 2 8 10 8 5 5 E 4 n 7 1 o 4 ) 9 1 8 i T t n 8 0 3 7 6 8 y l 2 a o 9 ) 8 G 1 i ) n 6 8 u t y A 1 5 l 1 l 2 o 0 a 9 8 a 2 9 n 1 0 s u 8 l V o ( B e 3 a 9 0 4 r 3 1 1 s s 2 8 7 2 1 V o 8 1 o 9 e 1 P f 6 1 0 9 r t s p 6 2 4 7 t 0 2 2 i r o l o f 9 u 6 p p 1 t 5 p i r A s l 1 9 ( u 1 1 8 p 1 1 p 7 3 s 1 3 8 1 ( 0 1 1 5 1 6 5 1 ) 2 5 0 0 2 8 3 6 0 1 9 1 0 9 17 ( 1 3 4 5 11 5 1 9 9 7 0 1 2 8 1 3 4 1 4 9 2 2 0 9 7 9 1 5 1 3 8 0 1 0 7 8 5 P 1 1 8 6 0 S 1 1 1 1 3 P 0 2 8 7 2 0 5 5 1 6 4 0 1 S 2 65 5 1 3 3 646 1 718963 6 1 17 1 2 350 71 5 104 3 41 42 55 P 0 60 S 9 2 8 61829 5 6 4 6 1 L 14 (16) ( 6 A 1 V 8 E ) 5 6 N 0 DE 2 R (2 0 1 HOLT STREET ) 7 (22) 1 A 1 5 9 (5) 6 5 1 9 1 5 5 S P 7 7 V B 8 9 4 6 8 1 2 4 7 9 7 I 3 3 2 8 C 8 C 6 8 2 3 T 1 8 4 8 1 1 O B A 292 1 8 44 P R 5 6 388442 6 1 S S (S 6 I p 3 li 2 S P A t P pu fo 10 rp r V 1 340 o a 8 s e lu 6 s a SP 9 0 ti 4 3 8 o o 51 5 P n n 0 0 1 8 l 8 1 5 y 1 - 5 2 46 6 ) P 4 2 0 S 1 L 12 1 8 0 1 9 7 A 0 1 85103 2 C 3 63515 3 4 6 E 1 B 68 4 66 8 62 6 36 6 -58) 27 6 (56 11 12 ) 8 5 -54 17 7 2 52 1 ( 5 1 6 6 6 58 63 1 4 42- 1 1007270 ) 6 T (50 T 9 2 EE 5 1 SP 4 E R 55 1 ST 53 1 6 27 3 E 4) 69 7 1 B -4 51 A 8 3 (42 2 1 3 7 20 4 R 47 1259 4 P 7 4 1 2 S 1 5 T 45 1 1 1 8 4 1 4 3 7 1 96 S 4 1 8 2 1 S 4 10 8 2 P 1 12 2 9 1 0 2 6 1 B 2 A 6 71 0 1 48 2 1 2 0 2 6 4 37 0 2 1 3 0 P 1 4 33 8 3 4) 5 U (4 5 S 31 6 B 1 2 8 P 6 L LL 1 1 I 8 9 1 1 E C CH 2 05 08 8 IT 1 4 S 1 1 M 1 2 1 7 P 5 P ET 5 7 1 A RE 73 8 0 1 T T 5 7 S 5 4 H W K T 9 AR E A P E 7 Y TR 20 S 3 3 5 1 0 07 2 2 7 1 6 5 6 68 753 1 SP 2 3 0 2 79 22 8 8 3 2 23 (20) 210 18 59 3 9 6 1 2 4 6 1 3 -51 S 35 SP P 8 1 2 5 1 51 4 38 60 3 3 7 1 Property/Applicant Submittors - Properties Notified Report of David Hoy, Team Leader Assessments Page 4 Re: 182-186 Blues Point Road, McMahons Point DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL The application seeks approval for demolition and fit out of existing tenancies on Levels 3 and 4 and associated works including construction of an interconnecting staircase between floor levels. The proposed described in detail: This application seeks approval for the following development: • The demolition of existing fit outs including partitions, doors and furniture; and the replacement of damaged ceiling and tile grids on Level 3 and Level 4; • A two (2) floor fit out on Level 3 and Level 4; and • An interconnecting staircase between Level 3 and Level 4. 1. Demolition Minor internal demolition works are proposed to facilitate the office fit out to the interiors of level 3 and 4. Level 3 will require the removal of existing fit out partitions, doors, furniture, fittings and equipment. Surfaces will then be prepared for the new proposed fit out. Level 4 will require the removal of furniture… Additionally, the development will require the demolition of existing ceiling grid and tiles to make way for the interconnecting staircase. Ceiling grid and tiles will be retained where possible, with the exception of those that are damaged (which will be replaced), or necessary for the proposed development (such as the proposed staircase)… 2. Proposed fit-out The proposed fit out will facilitate the ongoing use of the office space on levels 3 and 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Davince Tools Generated PDF File
    I I I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT I NORTH SYDNEY OLYMPIC POOL I I MILSONS POINT I I I I I I I I I I For Brian McDonald and Associates I On Behald ofHassell Pty Lt,! Architects I WendyThorp Cultural Resources Management I I I ! I i I ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT I NORTH SYDNEY OLYMPIC POOL I I MILSONS POINT I I I I I I I I February 1999 I I For Brian McDonald and Associates I On Behald ofHassell Pty Ltd Architects I WendyThorp I Cultural Resources Management I I I I Archaeological Assessment: North Sydney Olympic Pool I CONTENTS OF THE REPORT I I 1 I 1.0 Precis of the Report . 1 I 1.1 The Investigation ... 1 1.2 Historical Framework. 1 I 1.3 The Archaeological Resource 2 I 1.4 Cultural Significance 2 1.5 Management ... 2 I 2.0 The Investigation 3 I 2.1 The Study Area and Subject 3 I 2.2 Consent Condition 3 2.3 Status of the Site 3 I 2.4 Methodology .. 4 I 2.5 Objectives and Tasks. 4 2.6 Authorship,, Client and Acknowledgements 4 I 3.0 Historical Context . ....... ..... 6 I 3.1 The Pre-Settlement Environment. 7 3.2 James Milson and Domestic Settlement 8 I 3.3 Ferries and Trains 9 I 3.4 The Harbour Bridge . 10 I 3.5 The North Sydney Olympic Pool 11 I I I I Archaeological Assessment: North Sydney Olympic Pool I 4.0 The Archaeological Resource 12 I 4.1 Pre-Existing Features. 12 4.2 Conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • History Walk
    History Walk HENRY LAWSON’S already a highly urbanised nation by the time the colonies Federated in 1901. The ‘Legend of the NORTH SYDNEY Bush’ had great resonance in the city. A walking tour from McMahons And yet Lawson, too, spent much of his time in Point to Balls Head Sydney – and North Sydney. He lived in numerous dwellings between 1885, when he Distance: Approx. 3 Km stayed with Mrs Emma Brooks in East Crescent Approximate time: 2.5 hours Street, and 1920. You will pass by some of his Grading: High (there are residences on this walk. Other dwellings and several sets of places of significance include: Strathmere, Lord steep inclines and Street in 1899; rooms above the Coffee Palace stairs to negotiate) in Miller Street run by Mrs Isabel Byers who would care for Lawson for many years after this; Chaplin Cottage, Charles Street where Lawson’s second child Bertha was born in 1900; and Dind’s Hotel at the bottom of Alfred Street Milsons Point – the subject of the very funny poem ‘Dinds Hotel’ – … We hurried out of Campbell Street, and round to Dind’s hotel Where after two long beers apiece, we found the world “orright”… Curiously while Australia’s rural landscape was being well-interpreted and mythologised in poetry and prose, the communities around Sydney’s by-then famous Harbour were rarely explored in writing. Lawson’s portraits of life near Henry Lawson, c.1910. North Sydney Heritage the North Sydney waterfront are among the most Centre Collection/ Stanton Library, PF592/6 intimate and rare portrayals of ‘harbour people’ written.
    [Show full text]
  • Nsn Summer | 2007 North Sydney Given Sound Bill of Health
    northsydneynews |nsn summer | 2007 North Sydney given sound bill of health North Sydney Council has been given a sound sustainability rating by asset management consultants Jeff Roorda & Associates. Mr Roorda told Council that its sustainability ratio of .7 was the highest of any council the company had assessed to date. The company was commissioned by council to assess the sustainability of North Sydney’s infrastructure and develop an asset management plan. The ratio assigned to assets was a measure of the average amount council spends on assets divided by the amount that should be spent for optimal maintenance. As well as giving us an overall rating, the plan rates individual asset categories. Regional roads (ratio of 1.28), footpaths (1.09), bus shelters (.85) street signs (.81) and local roads (.79) have acceptable ratings, while seawalls (.65) and drainage (.62) have been identified as priorities and have received additional funding from this year’s infrastructure levy funds (see page 11). Council’s overall financial position was also assessed as sound by Auditors Spencer Steer and Associates. The operating result for the year was a surplus of $7.138 million. General Manager Penny Holloway said she was pleased but not surprised by the good bill of health. “North Sydney is debt free, we operate on a small surplus each year and have $48 million invested. This achievement is particularly impressive when you consider that North Sydney continues to have the lowest average rates in Sydney and a high level of customer satisfaction with our services.” Other key financial results for the 2006/2007 financial year included: • a total amount of $3.194 million worth of unrestricted cash and investments, which is available for day-to-day operations • developer contributions increased substantially compared to the previous financial year • user charges and fees, as well as investment interest, provided additional revenue.
    [Show full text]
  • ASIC 24A/03, Tuesday, 17 June 2003 Published by ASIC
    = = `çããçåïÉ~äíÜ=çÑ=^ìëíê~äá~= = Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. ASIC 24A/03, Tuesday, 17 June 2003 Published by ASIC ^^ppff``==dd~~òòÉÉííííÉÉ== Contents Life Insurance Unclaimed Money as at 31 December 2002 Specific disclaimer for Special Gazette relating to Life Unclaimed Monies The information in this Gazette is provided by life insurance companies and friendly societies to ASIC pursuant to the Life Insurance Act (Commonwealth) 1995. The information is published by ASIC as supplied by the relevant life insurance company and/or friendly society and ASIC does not add to the information. ASIC does not verify or accept responsibility in respect of the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information, and, if there are any queries or enquiries, these should be made direct to the life insurance company or friendly society. ISSN 1445-6060 (Online version) Available from www.asic.gov.au ISSN 1445-6079 (CD-ROM version) Email [email protected] © Commonwealth of Australia, 2002 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all rights are reserved. Requests for authorisation to reproduce, publish or communicate this work should be made to: Gazette Publisher, Australian Securities and Investment Commission, GPO Box 5179AA, Melbourne Vic 3001 Commonwealth of Australia Gazette ASIC Gazette ASIC 24A/03, Tuesday, 17 June 2003 Life Insurance Unclaimed Money Page 2= = Life Insurance Unclaimed Money as at 31 December 2002 Section 216 of Life Insurance Act 1995 STATEMENT OF UNCLAIMED MONEY UNDER THE LIFE INSURANCE ACT GENERAL INFORMATION Life Insurance Companies Unclaimed Money. In accordance with section 216 of the Life Insurance Act 1995 the list sets out details of unclaimed money of not less than $200.00 which life insurance companies have paid to the Commonwealth Government in respect of the year ended 31 December 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for the Sydney Harbour Highline?
    Is there a future for the Sydney Harbour HighLine? A comparative study of opportunities and limitations in re-vitalisation of elevated railway corridors. ALICJA BATOROWICZ August 2019 Diploma in Local Government Management University of Technology Sydney TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Chapter 1. HIGH-LINES AS AN OPEN SPACE STRATEGY 5 Chapter 2. SYDNEY HARBOUR HIGHLINE: THE NEXT GREEN OPEN SPACE OF SYDNEY 9 Chapter 3. COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGY 15 Chapter 4. PARKS OF THE HIGH LINE 17 Promenade Plantée and Viaduc des Arts 18 New York City High Line 23 Analysis 28 Chapter 5. ANALYSIS 30 Conclusion 35 REFERNCES 36 pg. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The objective of this dissertation is a research of existing examples of former urban railway corridors defined as high lines, successfully reclaimed and transformed to become a recreational open space. Through detailed analysis of two prime examples including Parisian Promenade Plantée and New York City High Line, the aim is to investigate and define the best model for the successful delivery of recently proposed Sydney Harbour HighLine. The aim is to establish a theory that adopted urban high lines are drivers behind economic growth, provide countless benefits to the society and work in harmony with the environment and cultural heritage. This dissertation seeks answers to the following questions: Is there a future for the Sydney Harbour HighLine? Will the revitalisation of Lavender Bay railway line become an elevated challenge or an opportunity? This dissertation has been presented in five chapters. The first chapter begins with an exploration of the unsustainable rate of rapid urbanization and its impact on the environment we live in.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Actions Arising (SOA) 2018 - Lavender Bay Precinct
    Summary of Actions Arising (SOA) 2018 - Lavender Bay Precinct This document is North Sydney Council’s response to actions arising from Precinct Committee Minutes. On receipt of the minutes, actions are numbered and allocated to relevant Council Officers for response. To effectively manage and provide clarity, all actions are allocated a status when reporting to Precinct Committees in response to their minutes. There are three categories: Awaiting Response - action allotted to Council Officer - response awaited. Open/Ongoing - action allocated to Council Officer, initial response provided. Matter ongoing and further response/update to be provided at later date. Closed for Council - Council either completed related works/tasks or has taken all reasonable steps within its power to resolve issue (for example when matter is beyond its jurisdiction). If the Precinct Committee feels Council can take further steps, they can request Council reopen action. Questions or concerns re content of this document should be directed to [email protected]. Month Item Actions Council’s Reply Status July 3 Luna Park clifftop: Lavender Bay Precinct Committee Precinct Committee’s comments noted, no action for Closed for asks the Minister for Planning (as consent authority for Council. Council the Luna Park site) to take urgent steps to ensure that the contaminated spoil is removed safely, that the area around the base of the trees is mulched, and that a watering system is installed for the health of the fig trees. Carried unanimously 4 3 East Crescent Street, McMahons Point: The Council’s Manager Parks and Reserves has advised that at Closed for meeting heard that the developer has taken legal action the 30 July 2018 Council meeting, a Mayoral Minute Council to obtain owners’ consent for the removal of the heritage (MM04: Endangered Native Trees at Both McMahons trees on Harbourside Apartments’ land.
    [Show full text]
  • Blues Point Acoustic Shed Modification Report
    City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Blues Point acoustic shed modification report August 2018 Sydney Metro Blues Point acoustic shed Modification Report Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of the proposed modification ............................................................................................... 2 Need and justification ............................................................................................................................ 2 Community consultation ....................................................................................................................... 2 Environmental assessment ................................................................................................................... 2 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 3 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose of this report ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Paper 6: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
    06 VICTORIA CROSS STATION Existing environment Existing environment To the north of the precinct, McLaren Street is located on a local ridgeline with a low to The project would occupy two separate sites mid-rise built form typology and a mix of centred on Miller Street in central North heritage and modern buildings. An avenue Sydney. These are 194-196a Miller Street of mature London planetrees line the street, in the north (near the corner of McLaren with grass verges, footpaths, and parallel Street), and 155-187 Miller Street in the parking, creating a suburban feel. south (near the corner of Berry Street). The northern site would be located at Generally the built character of this area is 194-196a Miller Street. This site is currently of a high-rise typology in the south, stepping occupied by two narrow 2-3 storey office down to mid-rise and low-rise frontages to buildings. This site is located adjacent to the north. This predominantly commercial a double storey heritage listed building area is interspersed with schools, tertiary ‘Montrose’ (currently used as a restaurant) education facilities, restaurants and retail. TOWER SQUARE AND SURROUNDING HIGH- at the corner of McLaren and Miller Streets, It includes several heritage buildings and RISE TOWERS and the Monte Sant’ Angelo Mercy College to conservation areas. In terms of architectural the south and west. style, there is a predominance of glazed and rendered concrete office towers juxtaposed The southern site would extend south from with the brick and stone facades of North Berry Street, along the eastern side of Miller Sydney’s remnant heritage buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Blues Point Tower
    Nationally Significant 20th-Century Architecture Revised date 06/04/2010 Blues Point Tower Address 14-28 Blues Point Road, McMahons Point, NSW, 2060 Practice Harry Seidler Designed Completed 1962 History & In 1957 the North Sydney Council proposed a rezoning of a Description large portion of McMahons Point for industrial redevelopment. The McMahons Point and Lavender Bay Progress Association, supported by outspoken architects, opposed the zoning, proposing an alternative residential scheme for the redevelopment of the peninsula. The scheme, designed by Harry Seidler, consisted of a hotel on Blues Point, seven high- rise; twelve mid-rise and nine low-rise apartments. The scheme was Corbusian in scale and proposed that views for residents would be maintained by placing low-rise apartments on the water’s edge with high-rise on the ridge. The residents’ campaign was successful. The New South Wales Government overturned the Council’s rezoning proposal in 1958. However, as a result of rising property values and the subsequent credit squeeze in 1960, the alternative grand scheme was never pursued. Planning scheme of 1957 (Source: The only site to be redeveloped was the hotel site on Blues Harry Seidler: Selected and Current Point which had earlier been acquired by Lend Lease. One of Works , 1997) Seidler’s high rise apartment buildings designed for the scheme was constructed there in 1961-62 by Civil and Civic, the second of many collaborations between Seidler and G. J. Dusseldorp and structural engineer Peter Miller – the first being Ithaca Gardens. Seidler sited the building diagonally across the points of the compass, providing water views for all apartments.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Placenames
    ABORIGINAL PLACENAMES NAMING AND RE-NAMING THE AUSTRALIAN LANDSCAPE ABORIGINAL PLACENAMES NAMING AND RE-NAMING THE AUSTRALIAN LANDSCAPE Edited by Harold Koch and Luise Hercus THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E P R E S S Published by ANU E Press and Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Monograph 19 This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/placenames_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Aboriginal placenames : naming and re-naming the Australian landscape / editors,Luise Hercus, Harold Koch. ISBN: 9781921666087 (pbk) 9781921666094 (pdf) Series: Aboriginal history monograph ; 19 Subjects: Names, Aboriginal Australian. Names, Geographical--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Hercus, L. A. (Luise Anna), 1926- Koch, Harold James. Dewey Number: 919.4003 Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Treasurer/Public Officer), Ingereth Macfarlane (Secretary/ Managing Editor), Richard Baker, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Christine Hansen, Luise Hercus, David Johnston, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Ann McGrath, Frances Peters-Little, Kaye Price, Deborah Bird Rose, Peter Radoll, Tiffany Shellam. Contacting Aboriginal History All correspondence should be addressed to Aboriginal History, Box 2837 GPO Canberra, 2601, Australia. Sales and orders for journals and monographs, and journal subscriptions: Thelma Sims, email: [email protected], tel or fax: +61 2 6125 3269, www.aboriginalhistory.org Aboriginal History Inc. is a part of the Australian Centre for Indigenous History, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University and gratefully acknowledges the support of the History Program, RSSS and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National University.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical State Significant Infrastructure Sydney Metro City & Southwest
    Critical State Significant Infrastructure Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Conditions of Approval Infrastructure approval Section 115ZB of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 I grant approval to the carrying out of the Critical State significant infrastructure (CSSI) referred to in Schedule 1, subject to the conditions in Schedule 2. Minister for Planning Sydney 2017 SCHEDULE 1 Application no.: SSI 15_7400 Proponent: Transport for NSW Approval Authority: Minister for Planning Land: Multiple properties and land comprised in Willoughby, Lane Cove, North Sydney, City of Sydney and Inner West Council areas. Description of Critical State Significant Infrastructure: Construction and operation of a metro rail line, approximately 16.5 kilometres long (of which approximately 15.5 kilometres is located in underground rail tunnels) between Chatswood and Sydenham, including the construction of a tunnel under Sydney Harbour, links with the existing rail network, seven metro stations, and associated ancillary infrastructure. Declaration as Critical State Significant Infrastructure The proposal is Critical State Significant Infrastructure by virtue of clause 5 of Schedule 5 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 (NSW) and section 115V of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). NSW Government 2 Department of Planning and Environment Conditions of Approval for CSSI CSSI 7400 MOD 1 – Victoria Cross and Artarmon Substation (determined 18 October 2017) CSSI 7400 MOD
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Archaeological Assessment & Research Design
    HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT & RESEARCH DESIGN APPENDIX H Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham - ARD Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham Historical Archaeological Assessment & Research Design Report to Jacobs / Arcadis / RPS FINAL_14102016 October 2016 Page i Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham - ARD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Background The proposed Sydney Metro City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham project (the project) is the subject of this Historical Archaeological Assessment and Research Design (ARD). The project would involve construction and operation of an underground rail line, about 15.5 kilometres long, and new stations between Chatswood and Sydenham. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) identified the potential for archaeological constraints and the need for the preparation of a historical ARD (mitigation measure NAH2) at all surface construction sites except Artarmon traction substation and Marrickville dive site (southern). This ARD has been prepared to comply with mitigation measure NAH2. The ten sites that are considered in this report are: x Chatswood dive site (northern) x Crows Nest Station x Victoria Cross Station x Blues Point temporary site x Barangaroo Station x Martin Place Station x Pitt Street Station x Central Station x Waterloo Station x Power Supply Routes – various locations near the metro rail line route. Archaeological Management The station and construction sites have been divided into archaeological management zones based on archaeological potential and construction impacts as submitted with the EIS. Archaeological management zone mapping provided in Section 13.3 is based on a ‘traffic light’ coding: x Red (Zone 1): Direct impact to significant archaeology. Archaeological investigation required prior to any construction impacts (bulk excavation etc.) x Amber (Zone 2): Potential impact to significant archaeology.
    [Show full text]