Memoirs, by Albert Speer Barbara Miller Lane Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Memoirs, by Albert Speer Barbara Miller Lane Bryn Mawr College, Blane@Brynmawr.Edu Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Growth and Structure of Cities Faculty Research Growth and Structure of Cities and Scholarship 1973 Review of Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs, by Albert Speer Barbara Miller Lane Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/cities_pubs Part of the Architecture Commons, History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Custom Citation Lane, Barbara M. Review of Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs, by Albert Speer. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 32 (1973): 341-346. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/cities_pubs/26 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 341 Violette, Gallo di Siena, Engelsberger, ical will to power we will create stone Negro Marquina. The author remarks documents."I As early as 1920, when the Skilledstonemasons and stonecarversare that most of the names are now unfamiliar Nazi movement had hardly begun, Adolf now difficultto find, and there are few in Vienna and unknown abroad. Hitler made this statementto his assembled books in print on these hard crafts.The The author also discussessome virtually audience at the Hofbraiuhausin Munich. Stonesof the ViennaRing, subtitled Their extinct nineteenth-centurycrafts: the Mar- From that time forward, until Berlin was Technologicaland Artistic Significance, is an morierer("marblers") boasted that their crumblingin ruinsaround him, Hitler con- extraordinaryvolume. artificial veined marble could not be dis- sistently repeated his promise to create a The authoris an EmeritusProfessor of tinguished from real marble in the same new monumental architecture,one which Geology at the ViennaPolytechnic who room; the Punktierer("pointers") did all would leave "stone documents" of the becameinterested in buildingstones about the hard carving for the eminent sculptors "thousand-yearReich." fifty yearsago. He was activeas a consul- who modelled statuary in clay and never Other authoritarianrulers were lavish tantto preservationistsof architecture,and wielded hammer and chisel in their lives. patrons of architecture.Often they sought he eventuallybecame a formidableauthor- The second part of the book gives con- to embody the idealsof their regimes in the ity in his interdisciplinaryfield. (The six- cise data and excellent descriptionsof some forms of the buildings they commissioned. teen-pagebibliography of thepresent book 460 buildings. The public and private But no other regime ever made so much of includesthirty-three books and articles by buildings of the Ring were enriched with its architecturein propaganda and public ProfessorKieslinger, published between muscular telamons, voluptuous caryatids, relations.None, for that matter,had a frus- 1929and 1972.)His expertisewas particu- and other sculptural decoration. The au- trated architectas dictator, a former archi- larly valuableafter World War II when thor treats sculpture as an integral part of tect as principalideologue,2 or a successful many buildingsin Viennawere damaged architecture.The Ring is a veritable out- architectas ministerof armamentsand war by bombingor artilleryand had to be re- door museum of statuary, and more than production. Hitler's admiration for archi- storedor razed.Clambering about black- loo monuments and fountainsare also de- tects and architecturewas unbounded. His enedwalls, the authorwas ableto identify scribed here. desire to create a personal, but lasting, hundredsof kindsof stoneand brick and to The illustrations are without doubt monumental architecture was a passion makeappropriate recommendations. among the finest architecturalphotographs which sometimeseven overrode his love of The volumeis dividedinto a "Technical ever published. It is evident that Elfriede conquest, to which it was closely allied. Part"and a "DescriptivePart." The first Mejcharalways found the preciseplace and The publication, in 1969 and 1970, of partdiscusses materials and methods which time of day at which the bold relief of Albert Speer'smemoirs3 has renewed pub- are rarelymentioned by architecturalhis- these buildings shows to best advantage. lic interestin these and other aspectsof the torians.In nineteenth-century Vienna there This is an original, scholarly,and beauti- Nazi regime. Aside from Rudolf Hess, still was a hierarchyof wall construction.In ful book. It was also a labor of love. serving his life term in Spandau prison, ascendingorder: Speer is the only surviving wartime inti- 1. BrickWall. Called in Viennaby the mate of Hitler; he was, for a time, the sec- pejorativename Rohbau("raw construc- In the October 1970 JSAH this reviewer ond most powerful man in the Third Reich. tion"). Used only for utilitarianbuildings wrote about the first volume of this series: But as the dust has settled, it has become like factoriesand stables. "On the evidence of this introductoryvol- apparentthat Speer'slengthy memoirs re- 2. BrickWall, stuccoed. The most com- ume and the announced program, Die veal surprisinglylittle about the mechanics mon type of construction.Often trimmed WienerRingstrasse is a monumental work of Nazi government. Scholars have ob- with stone. of relevanthistorical scholarship. It should served so many gaps in his account of the Brick 3. Wall,facedwith stone slabs. Only be of outstanding value and interest to all operation of his ministry as to shed consid- the brick is load-bearing.Similar to the serious students of nineteenth-century ar- erable doubt on the whole.4 Speer's char- Americanbrownstone house. chitecture and civilization." acterizationof Hitler as a man both forceful 4. StoneAshlar, backed with brick.Both The two volumes under review have and modest has helped to explain to a stoneand brick are load-bearing. kept the promise. broad popular audience in this country StoneWall. On 5. theRing only the Vo- JOHN MAASS Hitler's appeal to his followers, although tive Church,Opera, University,Parlia- City of Philadelphia ment, City Hall, and Burg Theaterwere entirelybuilt of costlycut stone. Hundredsof kinds of building stone 1. BarbaraMiller Lane,Architecture and Politics were broughtto Vienna,not only fromall in Germany,1918-1945 (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), partsof the Austro-Hungarianmonarchy p. 147 fn. 3. but alsofrom Italy, Germany, France, Bel- 2. Alfred Rosenberg. Albert Speer,Inside the ThirdReich; Me- 3. (1969) and Inside the Third Sweden, and Their Erinnerungen gium, Spain. very moirs,trans. from the German Richard Reich(1970). The English edition is more than a nameshave a rich,romantic sound-Ros- by and ClaraWinston, Introduction by Eu- translation:it omits a number of details present marino,Brocatello, Porto Venere,W6l- in the German edition and includes a few new gene Davidson,New York: Macmillan, lersdorfer, Savonnibre,Grotto Chiaro, passages.Unless otherwisenoted, page references 1970, xviii+ 596 pp., illus. $12.5o hard- in the notes below are to the version. Bardiglio, Margaretener,Rouge Royal, English back,$1.95 paper. 4. See, for example, Felix Gilbert, "The Dy- Breitenbrunner,Sankt Philippiner, Polce- namics of Nazi Totalitarianism,"Social Research, vera,Nalresina Galleria, Seravezza Brache "Outof ournew ideologyand our polit- XXXIX(1972), 191-203. 342 R7; "' 4* .... 3 , -~....?~-? ? r-; s.? :I r? ?; r ??%~t; 'it. Fig.3. Speer,studio for sculptorJosef Thorak(from Speer, Neue Deutsche Baukunst). Fig.2. Speer,New Chancellery,Berlin (fromSpeer, Neue Deutsche Baukunst). chelangesque.6If, on the otherhand, one confinesoneself to best-knownand Dance Dresden- Speer's Fig. 1. Tessenow, School, mosteffective the of Hellerau,before World War I (fromRittich, work, complex party at Architekturund Bauplastik der Gegenwart). congressgrounds Nuremberg,Speer's young, respectful,and eager to learnfrom talentappears to be thatof a stage-designer Hitler's earlier favorite, Paul Ludwig ratherthan an architect.Much of the this characterizationhas been familiar to Troost,who diedin 1934.He saystoo that, dramaof the Nurembergbuildings result- of as scholars for years from other memoirs. althoughHitler's architectural ideas were ed from the use flags quasi-architec- tural Speer's memoirs have also been much sometimesa littlegrandiose for his taste, he elements(Fig. 8); Speer'singenious of at also touted as a study in self-analysis,and cer- sharedwith bothHitler and Troost a fond- arrangement searchlights night the tainly a truthfulaccount of the motivations ness for Neo-classicalstyles, modernized helped to createexcitement among in the of a leading Nazi officialwould be good to andbrought up to date.Speer's own liking participants NurembergCongresses. But the executed have. Yet Speer's introspections,then and for Neo-classicismwas acquired,he says, among principal works, thenew Chan- now, never go much beyond banal trivi- partlyfrom his fatherand partly from his theparty congress grounds, for ality: teacherand supervisor at the BerlinTech- cellery(Fig. 2), the Germanpavilion nischeHochscule, Heinrich Tessenow. theParis World's Fair of 1937(Fig. 6), and In memoirs writingthese I becameincreasingly Someof thisis true: the little-knownstudio for sculptorJosef astonishedto realizethat before 1944 I so rarely surely Speer'syouth -in factalmost never-found the time to reflect does seem to have appealedto Hitler,as Thorak(Fig. 3), thereare commonand
Recommended publications
  • Speer: an Artist Or a Monster?
    Constructing the Past Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 14 2006 Speer: An Artist or a Monster? Emily K. Ergang Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing Recommended Citation Ergang, Emily K. (2006) "Speer: An Artist or a Monster?," Constructing the Past: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 14. Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol7/iss1/14 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by editorial board of the Undergraduate Economic Review and the Economics Department at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Speer: An Artist or a Monster? Abstract This article discusses the life of Albert Speer, who was hired as an architect by Hitler. It describes him as being someone who worked for a career and ignored the political implications of who he was working for. This article is available in Constructing the Past: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol7/iss1/14 Constructing the Past Speer: An Artist or a Monster? Emily Kay Ergang The regime of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi party produced a number of complex and controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2017 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2017 Hitler's Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone Aaron Mumford Boehlert Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2017 Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Boehlert, Aaron Mumford, "Hitler's Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone" (2017). Senior Projects Spring 2017. 136. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2017/136 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hitler’s Germania: Propaganda Writ in Stone Senior Project submitted to the Division of Arts of Bard College By Aaron Boehlert Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 2017 A. Boehlert 2 Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the infinite patience, support, and guidance of my advisor, Olga Touloumi, truly a force to be reckoned with in the best possible way. We’ve had laughs, fights, and some of the most incredible moments of collaboration, and I can’t imagine having spent this year working with anyone else.
    [Show full text]
  • American Intelligence and the Question of Hitler's Death
    American Intelligence and the Question of Hitler’s Death Undergraduate Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with honors research distinction in History in the Undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Kelsey Mullen The Ohio State University November 2014 Project Advisor: Professor Alice Conklin, Department of History Project Mentor: Doctoral Candidate Sarah K. Douglas, Department of History American Intelligence and the Question of Hitler’s Death 2 Introduction The fall of Berlin marked the end of the European theatre of the Second World War. The Red Army ravaged the city and laid much of it to waste in the early days of May 1945. A large portion of Hitler’s inner circle, including the Führer himself, had been holed up in the Führerbunker underneath the old Reich Chancellery garden since January of 1945. Many top Nazi Party officials fled or attempted to flee the city ruins in the final moments before their destruction at the Russians’ hands. When the dust settled, the German army’s capitulation was complete. There were many unanswered questions for the Allies of World War II following the Nazi surrender. Invading Russian troops, despite recovering Hitler’s body, failed to disclose this fact to their Allies when the battle ended. In September of 1945, Dick White, the head of counter intelligence in the British zone of occupation, assigned a young scholar named Hugh Trevor- Roper to conduct an investigation into Hitler’s last days in order to refute the idea the Russians promoted and perpetuated that the Führer had escaped.1 Major Trevor-Roper began his investigation on September 18, 1945 and presented his conclusions to the international press on November 1, 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich Max Schiller Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2012 Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich Max Schiller Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Schiller, Max, "Jürgen Habermas and the Third Reich" (2012). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 358. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/358 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Introduction The formation and subsequent actions of the Nazi government left a devastating and indelible impact on Europe and the world. In the midst of general technological and social progress that has occurred in Europe since the Enlightenment, the Nazis represent one of the greatest social regressions that has occurred in the modern world. Despite the development of a generally more humanitarian and socially progressive conditions in the western world over the past several hundred years, the Nazis instigated one of the most diabolic and genocidal programs known to man. And they did so using modern technologies in an expression of what historian Jeffrey Herf calls “reactionary modernism.” The idea, according to Herf is that, “Before and after the Nazi seizure of power, an important current within conservative and subsequently Nazi ideology was a reconciliation between the antimodernist, romantic, and irrantionalist ideas present in German nationalism and the most obvious manifestation of means ...modern technology.” 1 Nazi crimes were so extreme and barbaric precisely because they incorporated modern technologies into a process that violated modern ethical standards. Nazi crimes in the context of contemporary notions of ethics are almost inconceivable.
    [Show full text]
  • PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, and the V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ENGINEERING CONSENT: PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND THE V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael Brian Petersen, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005 Dissertation Directed By: Professor Jeffrey Herf Departmen t of History This dissertation is the story of the German scientists and engineers who developed, tested, and produced the V-2 missile, the world’s first liquid -fueled ballistic missile. It examines the social, political, and cultural roots of the prog ram in the Weimar Republic, the professional world of the Peenemünde missile base, and the results of the specialists’ decision to use concentration camp slave labor to produce the missile. Previous studies of this subject have been the domain of either of sensationalistic journalists or the unabashed admirers of the German missile pioneers. Only rarely have historians ventured into this area of inquiry, fruitfully examining the history of the German missile program from the top down while noting its admi nistrative battles and technical development. However, this work has been done at the expense of a detailed examination of the mid and lower -level employees who formed the backbone of the research and production effort. This work addresses that shortcomi ng by investigating the daily lives of these employees and the social, cultural, and political environment in which they existed. It focuses on the key questions of dedication, motivation, and criminality in the Nazi regime by asking “How did Nazi authori ties in charge of the missile program enlist the support of their employees in their effort?” “How did their work translate into political consent for the regime?” “How did these employees come to view slave labor as a viable option for completing their work?” This study is informed by traditions in European intellectual and social history while borrowing from different methods of sociology and anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern History
    MODERN HISTORY Albert Speer (1905 – 1981) Examine the degree to which Albert Speer was culpable in Hitler’s organization and implementation of crimes against humanity from 1937 to 1945. In the perspective of Israeli historian Omer Bartov1: “…our understanding of the Third Reich, revealing it as a consensual dictatorship whose popularity was rooted in…the profits of crimes against humanity on an unimaginable scale.” There is no doubt, based on the historical evidence, that Albert Speer2 (1905-1981) was intimately culpable, to some degree, in Nazi Germany’s appalling crimes against humanity from 1937 to 1945. At the Nuremberg Trials3 in 1945, Speer was convicted and sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment - largely on the basis of evidence showing his participation as Reich Minister for Production and Armaments, in the use of deportation and forced labour. The Court found Speer innocent on Counts One and Two; ‘planning, initiating and waging war of aggression’ and ‘crimes against peace’ respectively, and guilty on the counts of ‘war crimes’ and ‘crimes against humanity’. The charges which Speer faced at Nuremberg did not include reference to his earlier involvement, as Adolf Hitler’s (1889-1945) (Chief) First Architect of the Third Reich, and responsibility for re-planning Berlin in the ‘Germania’ project, which resulted in the forced removal of Jewish citizens from their homes in the city for the new Reich capital. Speer’s level of involvement in enslavement, the persecution of the Jews and his level of knowledge of the Holocaust remain subjects of historical debate. The unanswered question, as to which Speer was given the benefit of the doubt at Nuremberg, is whether he had any knowledge of Hitler’s initiated crimes against humanity and the awful fate that awaited Jews who were deported and ‘resettled’.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcus K. Billsonl/1 a Conversation with Albert Speer in the Summer Of
    Marcus K. Billsonl/1 A Conversation with Albert Speer In the summer of 1942 a picture was taken of Albert Speer walking in stride with his Fuhrer through the pine-studded military headquarters at Vinnitsa in the Ukraine. In the picture Speer is wearing a simple uniform, unadorned except for the swastika armband. His knee boots have been so highly polished they reflect the sunlight. The summer cam­ paign against Russia had been going well, and Speer, as the recently ap­ pointed Reich Minister of Armaments and War Production, had flown far into occupied territory to report personally to Hitler on the state of the German war industrial effort. The report had been highly favorable. Production figures had begun to rise, and they would continue to in­ crease at an astounding rate. In the picture, Hitler is obviously pleased, but his look of ebullience contrasts sharply with the tension and anxiety on the face of his minister. Speer's arms are folded stiffly across his chest and his body is bent slightly forward to catch each of the FUhrer's words. This posture expresses the Minister's attentiveness, but it also betrays a mood of deep preoccupation. The look on his face is curiously ambivalent. Though steely, it conveys profound weariness and distrac­ tion. The picture hints that perhaps even then Speer suspected that Hitler's fervent hopes for colonizing the Ukraine were deluded dreams. As I drove to Speer's home in Heidelberg almost thirty-five years later, that picture kept returning to my mind. I wondered at the changes time and history had wrought on this man I was about to meet.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermann Göring Und Albert Speer Bei Den Nürnberger Prozessen
    Hermann Göring und Albert Speer bei den Nürnberger Prozessen. Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten ihrer Verteidigungsstrategien Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Magisters der Philosophie an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von: Bernhard RAUTZ am Institut für Geschichte Begutachter: Univ.- Dozent Dr. Martin Moll GRAZ, Juli 2015 Danksagung: Zunächst möchte ich mich an dieser Stelle bei meinen Eltern Kurt und Martha, sowie meiner Schwester Katrin Rautz bedanken, die mich während der Anfertigung dieser Diplomarbeit unterstützt und motiviert haben. Ganz besonders gilt dieser Dank Herrn Dr. Martin Moll, der mich bei der Erstellung der Arbeit betreut hat. Vielen Dank für die Geduld und die Mühen. 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung .............................................................................................................. 4 2. Abstract Deutsch/Englisch ................................................................................... 5 3. Forschungsfrage und Methode ............................................................................ 6 4. Allgemeiner Teil .................................................................................................... 7 a. Albert Speer ....................................................................................................... 7 b. Hermann Göring ............................................................................................. 17 c. Der Nürnberger Prozess ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst E. Herzfeld
    116 OBITUARY The Booh of Wisdom and Lies (Kelmscott Press) and Visramiani (Oriental Translation Fund). His interest in everything relating to Georgia dated from the period of his youthful travels in that country, of which he published an account as early as 1888. W. FOSTER. Ernst E. Herzfeld Few scholars of our generation have contributed so much to increasing our knowledge of the sources for the study of ancient Western Asia in periods or directions of which little was previously known as Ernst Herzfeld. An established scholar of considerable reputation not only in his own University, Berlin, by 1910, his early work was encouraged by Eduard Meyer, the historian, and aided by the active co-operation of Friedrich Sarre, whose outstanding achievements there has yet been little chance to appreciate. Friend- ship and co-operation with Koldewey and the archaeological archi- tects of the mission of the Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft in Iraq, led him to admire their methods and made him a sound field- worker, without obscuring his firm understanding of the necessity for combining the study of language and history with archaeology if the tasks before him were to be accomplished. His training fitted him for the very diverse tasks he undertook. On his many journeys he continually noted new sites, and thus pointed the way for many later excavations, particularly in Persia. At some sites already well known he carried out fresh work unex- pectedly rich in results, notably at Samarra and Persepolis. He continually brought to our attention neglected subjects, such as the nature of the metal-working craft in the first millennium B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Friedrich Sarre and the Discovery of Seljuk Anatolia
    Friedrich Sarre and the discovery of Seljuk Anatolia Patricia Blessing The German art historian Friedrich Sarre (1865-1945) is well known for his role in the excavations of the Abbasid palaces of Samarra (Iraq) from 1911-13, which he directed together with Ernst Herzfeld (1879-1948), and as the director of the Islamic collection in the Berlin Museums from 1921 until 1931. Less well studied is Sarre’s work on Seljuk art and architecture, which presents some of the earliest studies of the subject during a period in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries when Islamic art history was a nascent academic field. Sarre’s work on medieval Anatolia has been analysed neither in the context of early studies on Seljuk architecture, nor in the general account of the emergence of Islamic art history as a field of scholarship. In a recent article, Oya Pancaroğlu has focused on Sarre’s first book on Anatolia, Reise in Kleinasien (Journey in Anatolia). 1 This travel account is based on Sarre’s exploration of the area in 1895, which lead to his wider interest in Islamic architecture. Sarre’s later work, however, much of which also includes work on the Seljuk monuments of Konya and on Seljuk art more broadly, has not yet been investigated in the context of the early art historical literature on Seljuk Anatolia. Sarre’s work remains rooted in the earlier vein of scholarship on Islamic art, particularly valuing Persianate objects and buildings. Thus, this article argues that, unlike many scholars who worked on the arts of Anatolia in the 1920s and 1930, after the foundation of the Republic of Turkey, Sarre didn’t focus on the region as the cradle of a nation, nor did he study Seljuk art as an expression of Turkish culture.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
    [Show full text]
  • Title: the Tangled Web: the Personal and Public Lies of Albert Speer
    Title: The Tangled Web: The Personal and Public Lies of Albert Speer Hist133B, Winter 2016, Source Exploration, By Samuel Fall: Albert Speer, “On Joining the Nazi Movement in 1931, 1969,” Document 8, from The Nazi State and German Society – Robert Moeller The source selected was Albert Speer, “On Joining the Nazi Movement in 1931.” Speer was born in Mannheim Germany, in 1905, to an upper middle class family (Forsgren, 2012, 8). He died on September 1, 1981 at St. Mary’s Hospital in London. This source is an excerpt taken from Speer’s memoir, Inside the Third Reich, which was published in 1969, after he was released from Spandau prison. The excerpt of Speer’s memoir, included in Moeller’s book, was intended to develop issues surrounding National Socialism such as citizenship, democracy, civil liberties, authoritarianism, and national security, which are all relevant in todays world. Moeller’s book seeks to bring these issues to life by providing easily accessible primary sources that allow college-level students to do the work of real historians by analyzing the original documents. I was not able to determine directly where or if Speer’s original memoir papers from Spandau were being kept. The following searches on Google failed to identify an organization holding his original Spandau papers: “where are albert speer's original papers,” “albert speer spandau original papers.” However, many of Speer’s personal and Spandau papers are archived in the Bundesarchiv (Federal Archives) in Koblenz Germany. The memoir papers are likely among them. There was no full text copy of “Inside the Third Reich” by Albert Speer, available for download at Google Books, but I was able to check the book out of the UCSB’s Davidson Library DD247.S63 A313 1970.
    [Show full text]