DOCSLIB.ORG

The STM Report 1968-2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The STM Report 1968-2018 The STM Report An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing 1968-2018 Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of STM Rob Johnson Research Consulting Anthony Watkinson CIBER Research Michael Mabe The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers Fifth edition, October 2018 The STM Report, Fifth Edition October 2018 © 2018 STM: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers Fifth Edition published October 2018 Published by: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers Prins Willem Alexanderhof 5, The Hague, 2595BE, The Netherlands About STM STM is the leading global trade association for academic and professional publishers. It has over 150 members in 21 countries who each year collectively publish over 66% of all journal articles and tens of thousands of monographs and reference works. STM members include learned societies, university presses, private companies, new starts and established players. Research Consulting works with publishers, research organisations, funders and policymakers to improve the effectiveness and impact of research and scholarly communication. For more information see www.research-consulting.com. CIBER Research is an international academic research group founded in 2002 at City University London and subsequently a research arm of the University College London Department of Information Studies. The CIBER team offer both consultancy and research. For further information see www.ciber-research.eu. Acknowledgements The STM Report, now in its fifth edition after 12 years, has grown out of all proportion to its first incarnation. This is reflected not just in the growth in the number of pages but also in there now being three main authors, and the breadth of the issues we now cover. This range of content far exceeds the expertise of any one of us. We want to place on record our warm appreciation for the input and advice of the following individuals whose insights have contributed to the finished text: IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Bev Acreman, Rick Anderson, Eric Archambault, Gaelle Bequet, Peter Berkery, Helen Blanchett, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Sam Burrell, Andrea Chiarelli, Lisa Christian, Barry Clarke, Laura Cox, Tom Cullen , Jeremy Dain, Craig Van Dyck, Michael Evans, Paul Evans, Martin Eve, Victoria Ficarra, Mattia Fosci, Elizabeth Gadd, Richard Gedye, Wouter Haak, Glenn Hampson, James Hardcastle, Eti Herman, Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Michael Jubb, Rachael Lammy, Carlo Scollo Lavizzari, Adriaan Lemmen, Matt McKay, Jo McShea, Natasha Mellins-Cohen, Ann Michael, Sheila Morrissey, Susan Patton, Dan Penny, Ed Pentz, Theo Pillay, Stephen Pinfield, Andrew Plume, Dan Pollock, Ian Potter, Andrew Preston, Vanessa Proudman, Charlie Rapple, Peter Richardson, Henning Schoenenberger, Eefke Smit, Susan Spilka, Heather Staines, Adrian Stanley, Carol Tenopir, Lennart Velten, Charles Watkinson, Kate Wittenberg, Jie Xu. As always, any errors or misunderstandings are ours alone. RJ, AW, MM September 2018 2 The STM Report, Fifth Edition October 2018 Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... 5 1. Scholarly communication ................................................................................... 11 1.1 The research lifecycle ................................................................................ 11 1.2 Types of scholarly communication ............................................................. 11 1.3 Changes in the scholarly communication system ....................................... 13 2. The journal ........................................................................................................ 14 2.1 What is a journal? ....................................................................................... 14 2.2 The journals publishing cycle ..................................................................... 14 2.3 Sales channels and models ....................................................................... 18 2.4 Journal economics and market size ........................................................... 22 2.5 Journal and article numbers and trends ..................................................... 25 2.6 Global trends in scientific output................................................................. 29 2.7 Authors and readers ................................................................................... 38 2.8 Publishers .................................................................................................. 40 2.9 Peer review ................................................................................................ 47 2.10 Reading patterns ........................................................................................ 57 2.11 Disciplinary differences .............................................................................. 61 2.12 Citations and the Impact Factor.................................................................. 64 2.13 Costs of journal publishing ......................................................................... 73 2.14 Authors’ behaviour, perceptions and attitudes ........................................... 77 2.15 Publishing ethics ........................................................................................ 80 2.16 Copyright and licensing .............................................................................. 83 2.17 Long term preservation .............................................................................. 89 2.18 Researchers’ access to journals................................................................. 91 2.19 Access in developing countries .................................................................. 94 3. Open Access ..................................................................................................... 97 3.1 Defining openness ...................................................................................... 98 3.2 Open access publishing ........................................................................... 101 3.3 Open access via self-archiving ................................................................. 114 3.4 The drive for open access ........................................................................ 126 3.5 Market penetration of open access publications ...................................... 133 3.6 Transitioning to a sustainable open access market .................................. 139 4. Technology in Scholarly Communication ......................................................... 148 4.1 Recent initiatives and organisations ......................................................... 148 3 The STM Report, Fifth Edition October 2018 4.2 Research data .......................................................................................... 153 4.3 Standards, identifiers and conventions ..................................................... 159 4.4 Technology trends .................................................................................... 163 4.5 Tools, apps and new services .................................................................. 166 4.6 Tools, apps and new services for funders and institutions ....................... 173 4.7 Social media and scholarly collaboration networks .................................. 174 4.8 Text and data mining ................................................................................ 178 4.9 Developments in preprint use and preprint servers .................................. 179 5. References ...................................................................................................... 184 4 The STM Report, Fifth Edition October 2018 Executive summary Scholarly communication and STM publishing 1. STM publishing takes place within the broader system of scholarly communication, which includes both formal and informal elements. Scholarly communication plays different roles at different stages of the research cycle, and (like publishing) is undergoing technology-driven change. Categorising the modes of communication into one-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many, and then into oral and written, provides a helpful framework for analysing the potential impacts of technology on scholarly communication (see page 11). 2. Journals form a core part of the process of scholarly communication and are an integral part of scientific research itself. Journals do not just disseminate information, they also provide a mechanism for the registration of the author’s precedence; maintain quality through peer review and provide a fixed archival version for future reference. They also provide an important way for scientists to navigate the ever- increasing volume of published material (page 14). The STM market 3. The annual revenues generated from English-language STM journal publishing are estimated at about $10 billion in 2017, within a broader STM information publishing market worth some $25.7 billion. About 41% of global STM revenues (including non- journal STM products) come from the USA, 27% from Europe/Middle East, 26% from Asia/Pacific and 6% from the rest of the world (page 22). 4. The industry employs an estimated 110,000 people globally, of which about 40% are employed in the EU. In addition, an estimated 20–30,000 full time employees are indirectly supported by the STM industry globally in addition to employment in the production supply chain (page 46). 5. Although this report focuses primarily on journals, the STM book
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How to Search for Academic Journal Articles Online
    How to search for Academic Journal Articles Online While you CAN get to the online resources from the library page, I find that getting onto MyUT and clicking the LIBRARY TAB is much easier and much more familiar. I will start from there: Within the Library tab, there is a box called “Electronic Resources” and within that box is a hyperlink that will take you to “Research Databases by Name.” Click that link as shown below: The page it will take you looks like the picture below. Click “Listed by Name.” This will take you to a list starting with A, and the top selection is the one you want, it is called “Academic Search Complete.” Click it as pictured below: THIS SECTION IS ONLY IF YOU ARE ON AN OFF-CAMPUS COMPUTER: You will be required to log-in if you are off campus. The First page looks like this: Use the pull-down menu to find “University of Toledo” The Branch should default to “Main Campus,” which is what you want. Then click “Submit.” Next it will ask for you First and Last Name and your Rocket ID. If you want to use your social security number, that is also acceptable (but a little scary.). If you use your rocket ID, be sure to include the R at the beginning of the number. Then click Submit again and you are IN. The opening page has the searchbox right in the middle. When searching, start narrow and then get broader if you do not find enough results. For Example, when researching Ceremony by Leslie Silko, you may want your first search to be “Silko, Ceremony.” If you don’t find enough articles, you may then want to just search “Silko.” Finally, you may have to search for “Native American Literature.” And so on and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • Announcement
    Announcement Total 100 articles, created at 2016-06-09 18:04 1 Best mobile games of 2016 (pictures) Looking for a new game to play on your mobile device? Here's our pick of the best released in 2016 (so far). 2016-06-09 12:53 677Bytes (1.08/2) www.cnet.com 2 Apple revamps App Store, may not win over developers Apple Inc. announced a series of long-awaited enhancements to (1.05/2) its App Store on Wednesday, but the new features may not ease concerns of developers and analysts who say that the App Store model - and the very idea of the single-purpose app - has... 2016-06-09 08:46 4KB pctechmag.com 3 HPE Unveils Converged Systems for IoT The Edgeline EL1000 and EL4000 systems are part of a larger series of announcements by HPE to address such IoT issues as (1.02/2) security and management. 2016-06-09 12:49 5KB www.eweek.com 4 What is AmazonFresh? Amazon launches new grocery service for the UK: Can I get (1.02/2) AmazonFresh in the UK? What is AmazonFresh, Amazon launches new grocery service for the UK, Can I get AmazonFresh in the UK, where does AmazonFresh deliver, what does AmazonFresh deliver 2016-06-09 12:42 3KB www.pcadvisor.co.uk 5 Borderlands 3 UK release date, price and gamelplay rumours: Gearbox has confirmed the (1.02/2) game is being developed Gearbox, the developers behind the Borderlands series are back it again with a new game on the horizon. 2016-06-09 11:00 3KB www.pcadvisor.co.uk 6 More Than 32 Million Twitter Passwords May Have Been Hacked And Leaked On The Dark (1.02/2) Web Last week Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg's social accounts; Pinterest and Twitter were briefly hacked, with the details coming from the LinkedIn breach that happened in 2012, with the founder of the world’s biggest social network reusing the password “dadada.” This time around Twitter users have become the..
    [Show full text]
  • Open Publications
    Open publications Research Services Essential Series Open Research Team 10th Feb 2021 1 Open Research team Caroline Huxtable (Open Access Repository Officer) Imogen Ward-Smith (Open Access Publications Officer) Chris Tibbs (Research Data Officer) Sofia Fernandes (Open Research Manager) www.exeter.ac.uk/research/openresearch/support/contact 2 http://www.exeter.ac.uk/research/researchdatamanagement/support/contact/ 2 Agenda • What is open research? • Why publish open access? • Open access, Symplectic and ORE • Open access policies • Publishing open access on the publisher website [email protected] 3 3 Open research Open research involves openness throughout the research lifecycle: • Openness as part of project planning / concept • Open notebook science • Making research methodology, software, code freely available • Open peer review • Open access to publications • Open data doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.49960 4 Open research lifecycle: Grigorov, Ivo. et al. (2016) ‘Research Lifecycle enhanced by an "Open Science by Default" Workflow’, Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.49960 Wikipedia: Open-notebook science is the practice of making the entire primary record of a research project publicly available online as it is recorded. This involves placing the personal, or laboratory, notebook of the researcher online along with all raw and processed data, and any associated material, as this material is generated. Open peer review includes e.g. the author and reviewer identities are disclosed to each other during the peer review process, unlike the traditional peer review process where reviewers are anonymous except to the editors; making reviewers' reports public, rather than disclosing to the authors only, (this may include publishing authors' replies and editors' recommendations); allowing self-selected reviewers to comment on an article, rather than (or in addition to) having reviewers selected by the editors.
    [Show full text]
  • Sci-Hub Provides Access to Nearly All Scholarly Literature
    Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature A DOI-citable version of this manuscript is available at https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100. This manuscript was automatically generated from greenelab/scihub-manuscript@51678a7 on October 12, 2017. Submit feedback on the manuscript at git.io/v7feh or on the analyses at git.io/v7fvJ. Authors • Daniel S. Himmelstein 0000-0002-3012-7446 · dhimmel · dhimmel Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania · Funded by GBMF4552 • Ariel Rodriguez Romero 0000-0003-2290-4927 · arielsvn · arielswn Bidwise, Inc • Stephen Reid McLaughlin 0000-0002-9888-3168 · stevemclaugh · SteveMcLaugh School of Information, University of Texas at Austin • Bastian Greshake Tzovaras 0000-0002-9925-9623 · gedankenstuecke · gedankenstuecke Department of Applied Bioinformatics, Institute of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University Frankfurt • Casey S. Greene 0000-0001-8713-9213 · cgreene · GreeneScientist Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania · Funded by GBMF4552 PeerJ Preprints | https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100v2 | CC BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 12 Oct 2017, publ: 12 Oct 2017 Abstract The website Sci-Hub provides access to scholarly literature via full text PDF downloads. The site enables users to access articles that would otherwise be paywalled. Since its creation in 2011, Sci- Hub has grown rapidly in popularity. However, until now, the extent of Sci-Hub’s coverage was unclear. As of March 2017, we find that Sci-Hub’s database contains 68.9% of all 81.6 million scholarly articles, which rises to 85.2% for those published in toll access journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Power in the Academic Publishing Industry
    Market Power in the Academic Publishing Industry What is an Academic Journal? • A serial publication containing recent academic papers in a certain field. • The main method for communicating the results of recent research in the academic community. Why is Market Power important to think about? • Commercial academic journal publishers use market power to artificially inflate subscription prices. • This practice drains the resources of libraries, to the detriment of the public. How Does Academic Publishing Work? • Author writes paper and submits to journal. • Paper is evaluated by peer reviewers (other researchers in the field). • If accepted, the paper is published. • Libraries pay for subscriptions to the journal. The market does not serve the interests of the public • Universities are forced to “double-pay”. 1. The university funds research 2. The results of the research are given away for free to journal publishers 3. The university library must pay to get the research back in the form of journals Subscription Prices are Outrageous • The highest-priced journals are those in the fields of science, technology, and medicine (or STM fields). • Since 1985, the average price of a journal has risen more than 215 percent—four times the average rate of inflation. • This rise in prices, combined with the CA budget crisis, has caused UC Berkeley’s library to cancel many subscriptions, threatening the library’s reputation. A Comparison Why are prices so high? Commercial publishers use market power to charge inflated prices. Why do commercial publishers have market power? • They control the most prestigious, high- quality journals in many fields. • Demand is highly inelastic for high-quality journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Don's Conference Notes
    Don’s Conference Notes by Donald T. Hawkins (Freelance Conference Blogger and Editor) <[email protected]> Information Transformation: Open. Global. Plenary Sessions Collaborative: NFAIS’s 60th Anniversary Meeting Regina Joseph, founder of Sibylink (http://www.sibylink.com/) and co-founder of pytho (http://www.pytho.io/), consultancies that Column Editor’s Note: Because of space limitations, this is an specialize in decision science and information design, said that we are abridged version of my report on this conference. You can read the gatekeepers of knowledge and information. Information has never full article which includes descriptions of additional sessions at been more accessible, in demand, but simultaneously under attack. https://against-the-grain.com/2018/04/nfaiss-60th-anniversary- There is both a challenge and an opportunity in information system meeting/. — DTH availability and diversity. News outlets have become organs of influ- ence, and social networks are changing our consumption of information (for example, 26% of news retrieval is through social media). We are In 1958, G. Miles Conrad, director of Biological Abstracts, con- willingly allowing ourselves to be controlled. How will we be able to vened a meeting of representatives from 14 information services to harness the advantages of open access to information when the ability collaborate and cooperate in sharing technology and discussing issues of to access it might be compromised? We need people with multiple mutual interest. The National Federation of Abstracting and Indexing areas of specialist knowledge but who are also connected with broad (now Advanced Information) Services (NFAIS) was formed as a result and general knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Steering Science Through Output Indicators & Data Capitalism
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 9-2019 Steering science through Output Indicators & Data Capitalism Ulrich Herb Saarland University & State Library Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Herb, Ulrich, "Steering science through Output Indicators & Data Capitalism" (2019). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 125. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/125 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Steering science through Output Indicators & Data Capitalism Published in: Proceedings of the 23rd Congress of the European Society of Veterinary and Comparative Nutrition (ESVCN 2019), Turin/ Italy, 17-20 September 2019. Author: Ulrich Herb, ORCID: 0000-0002-3500-3119 Affiliations: Saarland University & State Library ./scidecode science consulting & research Please cite as: Herb, Ulrich (2019). Steering science through Output Indicators & Data Capitalism. Proceedings of the 23rd Congress of the European Society of Veterinary and Comparative Nutrition, Turin 2019. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3333395 Performance tracking in science Since the mid-1920s, a scientist's performance was tracked by using bibliometric information such as the number of publications or their citations. Today, there are unprecedented possibilities for controlling science by analysing data on production and use of scientific information, so that citations only play a subordinate role in the evaluation of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing
    THE OPEN SCIENCE INITIATIVE WORKING GROUP Mapping the Future of Scholarly Publishing The Open Science Initiative (OSI) is a working group convened by the National Science Communi- cation Institute (nSCI) in October 2014 to discuss the issues regarding improving open access for the betterment of science and to recommend possible solutions. The following document summa- rizes the wide range of issues, perspectives and recommendations from this group’s online conver- sation during November and December 2014 and January 2015. The 112 participants who signed up to participate in this conversation were drawn mostly from the academic, research, and library communities. Most of these 112 were not active in this conversa- tion, but a healthy diversity of key perspectives was still represented. Individual participants may not agree with all of the viewpoints described herein, but participants agree that this document reflects the spirit and content of the conversation. This main body of this document was written by Glenn Hampson and edited by Joyce Ogburn and Laura Ada Emmett. Additional editorial input was provided by many members of the OSI working group. Kathleen Shearer is the author of Annex 5, with editing by Dominque Bambini and Richard Poynder. CC-BY 2015 National Science Communication Institute (nSCI) www.nationalscience.org [email protected] nSCI is a US-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization First edition, January 2015 Final version, April 2015 Recommended citation: Open Science Initiative Working Group, Mapping the Future of Scholarly
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Altmetric Scores of Open Access Articles and of Articles
    Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft Heft 444 Altmetrics and Open Access Comparison of Altmetric Scores of open and closed access articles published by German research institutions in the field of natural sciences von Lea Satzinger Altmetrics and Open Access Comparison of Altmetric Scores of open and closed access articles published by German research institutions in the field of natural sciences von Lea Satzinger Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft Begründet von Peter Zahn Herausgegeben von Vivien Petras Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Heft 444 Satzinger, Lea Altmetrics and Open Access : Comparison of Altmetric Scores of open and closed access articles published by German research institutions in the field of natural sci- ences / von Lea Satzinger. - Berlin : Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswis- senschaft der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2019. – 81 S. : 15 Abb. - (Berliner Handreichungen zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft ; 444) ISSN 14 38-76 62 Abstract Altmetrics, in contrast to traditional metrics, measure the societal impact research outputs have on the public in general, using social media platforms as their primary data sources. In this study, differences in Altmetric Scores between open and closed access articles of German research institutions in the field of natural sciences have been analyzed. For this investigation data from the years 2013 to 2017 was gathered from Web of Science, Altmetric.com and Unpaywall. Results indicated that arti- cles published in open access gain higher Altmetric Attention Scores compared to articles behind subscription paywalls, although the difference was statistically not significant. Research outputs published in gold open access had the highest scores, followed by articles in green and then hybrid open access.
    [Show full text]
  • What's New and What's Coming
    Digital Commons: What’s New and What’s Coming? DC Great Lakes User Group meeting, July 2019 Shandon Quinn, VP Product Management, bepress Elsevier [email protected] The modern IR Maximizing visibility and impact of everything an institution does, to help it stand out Showcase Increase Surpass More Impact Standards The institution’s broad Generating, maximizing, Operate IR confidently, range of works and demonstrating seamlessly, without risk Showcase More Unlock more content Populate content faster Unlocking more content & populating content faster Image Support for Galleries of Journal Faculty Batch collection Batch Revise data and Faculty structure Profiles Upload structure data sets Profiles Digital Commons Product Improvements Series Content Conference Book Book Timelines structure Carousels structure structure galleries Native Multimedia Streaming: Unlocking an institution’s multimedia collections Native Multimedia Streaming: Unlocking an institution’s multimedia collections Upload and publish workflow performance is our top priority Login speed Upload speed Update speed Cloud migration to AWS Page load speed Batch upload Harvesting Integrations: Faster IR population | Comprehensive representation 500 100% Avg number of faculty publications Goal that every institution has for faculty per year publication representation in IR Harvesting Integrations: Faster IR population | Comprehensive representation CRIS/RIMS Systems Abstract & Index Databases Preprint Servers Synchronize workflows across Populate multiple repositories library and
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliometric Study of Indian Open Access Social Science Literature Deep Kumar Kirtania [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2018 Bibliometric Study of Indian Open Access Social Science Literature Deep Kumar Kirtania [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Kirtania, Deep Kumar, "Bibliometric Study of Indian Open Access Social Science Literature" (2018). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1867. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1867 Bibliometric Study of Indian Open Access Social Science Literature Deep Kumar Kirtania Library Trainee, West Bengal Secretariat Library & M.Phil Scholar, Department of Library & Information Science University of Calcutta [email protected] Abstract: the purpose of this study is to trace out the growth and development social science literature in open access environment published from India. Total 1195 open access papers published and indexed in Scopus database in ten years have considered for the present study. Research publication from 2008 to 2017 have been analyzed based on literature growth, authorship pattern, activity index, prolific authors and institutions, publication type, channel and citation count have examined to provide a clear picture of Indian social science research. The study shows the dominance of shared authorship and sixty percentages of total articles have been cited. This original research paper described the research productivity of social science in open access context and will be helpful to the social scientist and library professional as a whole. Key Words: Bibliometric study, Research Growth, Social Sciences, Open Access, Scopus, India Introduction: Scholarly communications have been the primary source of creating and sharing knowledge by academics and researchers from the mid 1600s (Chan, Gray & Kahn, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Research Information Hub and Nordic Collaboration
    Finnish Research Information Hub and Nordic collaboration Hanna-Mari Puuska, CSC – IT Center for Science, Finland CSC – Finnish research, education and public administration ICT knowledge centre Contents of the presentation 1. Background: Publication data collection in Finland 2. VIRTA Publication Information Service 3. The Finnish Research Information Hub 2020 4. Towards a Nordic research information infrastructure? 2 Background: Publication Data Collection in Finland 3 Background: Publication data collection in Finland • Ministry of Education and Culture has collected bibliographic information on publications annually from • 14 universities and 5 university hospital districts (since 2011) • 23 universities of applied sciences (since 2012) • 12 state research institutes (gradually since 2014) • Each organization has its own CRIS system • Pure, Converis or SoleCRIS • JUSTUS Publication Information Reporting Service for small organizations www.justus.csc.fi • In total, ~50 000 publications per year = books, journal articles, conference papers, non-scholarly publications • The data are publicly available • Statistical data: www.vipunen.fi • Bibliographic data: www.juuli.fi JUULI publication portal (www.juuli.fi) 5 Vipunen statistical portal (www.vipunen.fi) 6 Finnish Publication Forum www.julkaisufoorumi.fi • Used for publication channel rankings as part of universities’ funding model • The ranking is based on journals, series and publishers evaluated by national scholarly panels in • Integrated with other relevant databases (e.g. ISSN,
    [Show full text]