Diplomarbeit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diplomarbeit View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OTHES Diplomarbeit Breeding better Americans The Impact of Eugenics and Scientific Racism on 20th Century Social Politics in the US. Verfasser Marlene Scherf Angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, Jänner 2012 Studienkennzahl: A 300 Studienrichtung: Politikwissenschaft Betreuerin: Mag. Dr. Karin Liebhart 2 Table of Contents Persönliche Erklärung ................................................................................ 7 Remarks ................................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgements .................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................ 10 1. Personal Approach and Motivation ............................................... 11 1.1 Topic of Research and methodological Approach ................................. 11 1.2 Structural outline of thesis ...................................................................... 13 2. Main Terms .................................................................................... 13 2.1 Scientific Racism ................................ Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. 2.2 Eugenics .................................................................................................. 14 2.3 Compulsory Sterilization ........................................................................ 15 3 Development of Eugenics in History ............................................. 15 3.1 Developments in Britain ......................................................................... 16 3.2 United States Movement ........................................................................ 18 3.3 The Oneida Community ......................................................................... 22 3.4 Francis Galton ......................................................................................... 23 3.5 Charles Davenport .................................................................................. 25 3.6 Davenport‟s Research ............................................................................. 27 4 Influence of Foreign Blood ............................................................ 28 5 Eugenics and Scientific Racism in the 20th Century .................... 30 5.1 H.R. 10384: Immigration Bill of 1917 / Immigration Act of 1924 ........ 31 3 5.2 Harry Laughlin ........................................................................................ 36 5.3 Laughlin‟s “Model Law” ........................................................................ 36 5.4 Laughlin‟s Idea of Immigration Policy .................................................. 38 6 Financing ........................................................................................ 40 6.1 The Pioneer Fund .................................................................................... 43 7 Sterilization in the US .................................................................... 46 7.1 First Signs of Compulsory Sterilization Laws........................................ 46 7.1.1 Compulsory Sterilization in California ............................................ 47 7.1.2 Overview Sterilization Laws in California (Gottshall) .................... 47 7.1.3 California Sterilization law facts ...................................................... 50 7.2 Sterilization in Virginia .......................................................................... 51 7.2.1 Buck vs. Bell .................................................................................... 51 7.3 Sterilization abuses ................................................................................. 52 7.3.1 Nial Ruth Cox ................................................................................... 52 7.3.2 Relf Sisters ........................................................................................ 52 7.3.3 Mardirgal vs. Quilligan .................................................................... 53 8 William Shockley‟s Voluntary Sterilization Bonus Plan .............. 54 8.1 Anti-miscegenation Laws ....................................................................... 55 8.2 Racial Integrity Act ................................................................................. 56 8.3 Loving vs. Virginia ................................................................................. 57 9 Transformation of the Eugenics Movement .................................. 59 9.1 Law for the Prevention of Offspring with Hereditary Diseases ............. 63 9.2 The Cooper-Hewitt Case ........................................................................ 65 9.3 The fear of “race suicide” ....................................................................... 66 9.3.1 Medicine and Family (-planning) ..................................................... 67 9.3.2 Education meets Heredity ................................................................ 69 10 Conclusion ...................................................................................... 72 4 11 Annex ............................................................................................. 76 11.1 Short overview and timeline of the US Eugenic Movement .................. 76 11.2 Short overview and timeline of the US policy on immigration and Naturalization ................................................................................................... 77 12 References/Sources ........................................................................ 81 13 Abstracts ......................................................................................... 86 5 6 Persönliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit, dass ich die vorliegende schriftliche Arbeit selbstständig verfertigt habe und dass die verwendete Literatur bzw. die verwendeten Quellen von mir korrekt und in nachprüfbarer Weise zitiert worden sind. Mir ist bewusst, dass ich bei einem Verstoß gegen diese Regeln mit Konsequenzen zu rechnen habe. 16. Jänner, 2012 _______________ ______________________________ Datum Marlene SCHERF 7 Remarks The purpose of this thesis is to provide an insight in the US Eugenics and Scientific Racism policy in the 20th century and discover a connection between them. I aim to base my argument on reliable sources. The objective of this thesis is to give a valuable insight into the topic of Scientific Racism and raise awareness about the fact that Scientific Racism is still a big issue in our society nowadays. Certainly, with reference to the Holocaust we have a devastating historical past to keep in mind, but nevertheless there are issues such as Scientific Racism, which have to be clearly separated from these excruciating events in our history in order to maintain its own importance. Still there is a linkage to National Socialism as the US Eugenics Movement showed some interest and enthusiasm for the work of German racial hygiene. There are many countries, which suffered under different kinds of Scientific Racism such as Puerto Rico or South Africa during Apartheid. For my research I took a closer look at the situation in the US where the issue of Scientific Racism has been very difficult, as outlined above. 8 Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to express my thankfulness to Dr. Karin Liebhart, who supported me and my research and was very patient and understanding throughout the process of writing this thesis. My appreciation also goes to Mama, David, Mara, Angelina, Tina, Gernot, Laura my friends and colleagues, and especially Andreas Riecken and Ambassador Christian Prosl – there are not enough words to describe my gratitude. Thank you. 9 Introduction Scientific Racism is mostly known as a social and scientific phenomenon in the United States. In the 19th and 20th century American scientists spent millions of dollars on research in order to prove that certain groups of Americans are superior to others by birth. The research took different directions and soon found its way into US social politics: laws for compulsory (forced) Sterilization were enacted, in schools students were educated on how to find a good husband or wife for demographic reasons and of course the racial problem between the black and the white population intensified. The crucial point for studies on Scientific Racism was the Eugenics Movement with its early roots in the 18th century. The compulsory Sterilization is just one example of how Scientific Racism made it into social politics. Compulsory Sterilization is also known as forced Sterilization which basically means that the procedure was performed without the agreement of the patient or to be more specific, in some cases an agreement was not necessary due to insufficient the physical or mental condition of the patient. The condition of the patient could have been diagnosed by a doctor, physician or for example by the State Eugenicist. At the end of the 1950‟s a forced Sterilization law was enacted in 27 US States. It took a long time until the law disappeared again from the books. In 1981 Oregon was to be the last state, which performed a legal Sterilization. Another issue, which was highly supported by the Eugenics Movement in the United States, was that of marriage. In the course of this movement “marriage laws” were enacted which had the purpose to prevent “inter-racial” marriages. In other words: They enacted laws to prohibit marriages between
Recommended publications
  • Race and Membership in American History: the Eugenics Movement
    Race and Membership in American History: The Eugenics Movement Facing History and Ourselves National Foundation, Inc. Brookline, Massachusetts Eugenicstextfinal.qxp 11/6/2006 10:05 AM Page 2 For permission to reproduce the following photographs, posters, and charts in this book, grateful acknowledgement is made to the following: Cover: “Mixed Types of Uncivilized Peoples” from Truman State University. (Image #1028 from Cold Spring Harbor Eugenics Archive, http://www.eugenics archive.org/eugenics/). Fitter Family Contest winners, Kansas State Fair, from American Philosophical Society (image #94 at http://www.amphilsoc.org/ library/guides/eugenics.htm). Ellis Island image from the Library of Congress. Petrus Camper’s illustration of “facial angles” from The Works of the Late Professor Camper by Thomas Cogan, M.D., London: Dilly, 1794. Inside: p. 45: The Works of the Late Professor Camper by Thomas Cogan, M.D., London: Dilly, 1794. 51: “Observations on the Size of the Brain in Various Races and Families of Man” by Samuel Morton. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, vol. 4, 1849. 74: The American Philosophical Society. 77: Heredity in Relation to Eugenics, Charles Davenport. New York: Henry Holt &Co., 1911. 99: Special Collections and Preservation Division, Chicago Public Library. 116: The Missouri Historical Society. 119: The Daughters of Edward Darley Boit, 1882; John Singer Sargent, American (1856-1925). Oil on canvas; 87 3/8 x 87 5/8 in. (221.9 x 222.6 cm.). Gift of Mary Louisa Boit, Julia Overing Boit, Jane Hubbard Boit, and Florence D. Boit in memory of their father, Edward Darley Boit, 19.124.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America
    Voces Novae Volume 11 Article 3 2019 Engineering Mankind: The oS ciopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae Part of the American Politics Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Genetics and Genomics Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Megan (2019) "Engineering Mankind: The ocS iopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America," Voces Novae: Vol. 11, Article 3. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Voces Novae by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lee: Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”1 This statement was made by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. while presenting the court’s majority opinion on the sterilization of a seventeen-year old girl in 1927. The concept of forced sterilization emerged during the American Eugenics Movement of the early 20th century. In 1909, California became one of the first states to introduce eugenic laws which legalized the forced sterilization of those deemed “feeble-minded.” The victims were mentally ill patients in psychiatric state hospitals, individuals who suffered from epilepsy and autism, and prisoners with criminal convictions, all of whom were forcibly castrated.
    [Show full text]
  • !History of Lightingv2.Qxd
    CONTENTS Introduction 3 The role of lighting in modern society 3 1. The oldest light sources 4 Before the advent of the lamp 4 The oldest lamps 4 Candles and torches 5 Further development of the oil lamp 6 2. Gaslight 9 Introduction 9 Early history 9 Gas production 10 Gaslight burners 10 The gas mantle 11 3. Electric lighting before the incandescent lamp 14 Introduction 14 Principle of the arc lamp 15 Further development of the arc lamp 16 Applications of the arc lamp 17 4. The incandescent lamp 20 The forerunners 20 The birth of the carbon-filament lamp 22 Further development of the carbon-filament lamp 25 Early metal-filament lamps 27 The Nernst lamp 28 The birth of the tungsten-filament lamp 29 Drawn tungsten filaments 30 Coiled filaments 30 The halogen incandescent lamp 31 5. Discharge lamps 32 Introduction 32 The beginning 32 High-voltage lamps 33 Early low-pressure mercury lamps 34 The fluorescent lamp 35 High-pressure mercury lamps 36 Sodium lamps 37 The xenon lamp 38 6. Electricity production and distribution 39 Introduction 39 Influence machines and batteries 39 Magneto-electric generators 40 Self-exciting generators 41 The oldest public electricity supply systems 41 The battle of systems 42 The advent of modern a.c. networks 43 The History of Light and Lighting While the lighting industry is generally recognized as being born in 1879 with the introduction of Thomas Alva Edison’s incandescent light bulb, the real story of light begins thousands of years earlier. This brochure was developed to provide an extensive look at one of the most important inventions in mankind’s history: artificial lighting.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenics, Pt. 2
    Eugenics, Pt. 2 8.31 Lecture - LPS 60 Review: Eugenicists claim to be supported by which two scientific theories? Scientific theory Application by Eugenicists Natural Selection -----------> Darwinian Morality (“Might makes right”) Hard Heredity ------------> Genetically-determined Social fitness Review: Eugenicists claim to be supported by which two scientific theories? Scientific theory Application by Eugenicists Natural Selection -----------> Darwinian Morality (“Might makes right”) Hard Heredity ------------> Genetically-determined Social fitness 1. Darwinian Morality “One of the effects of civilization is to diminish the rigour of the application of the law of natural selection. It preserves weakly lives that would have perished in barbarous lands.” “The question was then forced upon me: Could not the race of men be similarly improved? Could not the undesirables be got rid of and the desirables multiplied?” - Francis Galton, "Hereditary Talent and Character" in MacMillan's Magazine Vol. XII (May - October 1865). London Poster, 1910s 2. Genetically-determined social fitness The following groups are deemed socially ‘unfit’: epileptics, depressed, poor (paupers), criminals, alcoholics, blind, deformed, deaf, feeble-minded Galton (1869) focuses on intelligence. Laughlin (1922) includes all of these groups and more under the label “socially inadequate”. London Poster, 1910s “Eugenics...is capable of becoming the most sacred ideal of the human race, as a race; one of the supreme religious duties… Once the full implications of evolutionary biology are grasped, eugenics will inevitably become part of the religion of the future” - Julian Huxley, Eugenics Review (28:1), 1936 Huxley was a biology professor at King’s College London & the Royal Institution as well as a Fellow of the Royal Society of London; he’s said to be the founder of the “modern evolutionary synthesis”.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving on Nature: Eugenics in Utopian Fiction
    1 Improving on Nature: Eugenics in Utopian Fiction Submitted by Christina Jane Lake to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English, January 2017 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright materials and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approve for the award of a degree by this or any other university. (Signature)............................................................................................................. 2 3 Abstract There has long been a connection between the concept of utopia as a perfect society and the desire for perfect humans to live in this society. A form of selective breeding takes place in many fictional utopias from Plato’s Republic onwards, but it is only with the naming and promotion of eugenics by Francis Galton in the late nineteenth century that eugenics becomes a consistent and important component of utopian fiction. In my introduction I argue that behind the desire for eugenic fitness within utopias resides a sense that human nature needs improving. Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859) prompted fears of degeneration, and eugenics was seen as a means of restoring purpose and control. Chapter Two examines the impact of Darwin’s ideas on the late nineteenth-century utopia through contrasting the evolutionary fears of Samuel Butler’s Erewhon (1872) with Edward Bellamy’s more positive view of the potential of evolution in Looking Backward (1888).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Electric Light
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 76. NUMBER 2 HISTORY OF ELECTRIC LIGHT BY HENRY SGHROEDER Harrison, New Jersey PER\ ^"^^3^ /ORB (Publication 2717) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION AUGUST 15, 1923 Zrtie Boxb QSaftitnore (prcee BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. CONTENTS PAGE List of Illustrations v Foreword ix Chronology of Electric Light xi Early Records of Electricity and Magnetism i Machines Generating Electricity by Friction 2 The Leyden Jar 3 Electricity Generated by Chemical Means 3 Improvement of Volta's Battery 5 Davy's Discoveries 5 Researches of Oersted, Ampere, Schweigger and Sturgeon 6 Ohm's Law 7 Invention of the Dynamo 7 Daniell's Battery 10 Grove's Battery 11 Grove's Demonstration of Incandescent Lighting 12 Grenet Battery 13 De Moleyns' Incandescent Lamp 13 Early Developments of the Arc Lamp 14 Joule's Law 16 Starr's Incandescent Lamp 17 Other Early Incandescent Lamps 19 Further Arc Lamp Developments 20 Development of the Dynamo, 1840-1860 24 The First Commercial Installation of an Electric Light 25 Further Dynamo Developments 27 Russian Incandescent Lamp Inventors 30 The Jablochkofif " Candle " 31 Commercial Introduction of the Differentially Controlled Arc Lamp ^3 Arc Lighting in the United States 3;^ Other American Arc Light Systems 40 " Sub-Dividing the Electric Light " 42 Edison's Invention of a Practical Incandescent Lamp 43 Edison's Three-Wire System 53 Development of the Alternating Current Constant Potential System 54 Incandescent Lamp Developments, 1884-1894 56 The Edison " Municipal
    [Show full text]
  • Ann Cooper Hewitt G.S
    HIGH SOCIETY The Curious Case of Ann Cooper Hewitt G.S. Payne looks at a long-forgotten scandal that rocked America’s high society in the 1930s “I’M ONLY A sterilized heiress, foundries, as well as from a litany nia millionaire who came from A butt for the laughter of rubes, of inventions that ranged from the one of the oldest, wealthiest fami- I’m comely and rich, first US steam locomotive to the lies in New York society. Where But a venomous bitch — first gelatin dessert (later to exactly Maryon came from My mother ran off with my tubes!” become better known by its brand remains sketchy. She seemed to — Gene Fowler, journalist/humorist, name, Jell-O). Cooper’s son-in- have cultivated an image of a pop- the New York Daily Mirror, 1936 law, Abram Stevens Hewitt, was a ular Southern belle from Virginia. It was the story of the year, mayor of New York City and gen- But according to daughter Ann, the sensational scandal everyone erally regarded as the father of the “While my mother has always was talking about from New York New York City subway system. boasted of her Southern aristoc- to San Francisco. Ann Cooper Cooper’s grandson (Ann’s father) racy, she was the daughter of a Hewitt was the heiress to a horsecar driver in San Francisco fortune, and she was suing who lived in a flat over a corner her own mother, Maryon grocery store when she was a Cooper Hewitt, for half a mil- girl.” lion dollars. Why? Because Wherever she came from, two years earlier, in 1934, Maryon found her way into when Ann was 20 and still money and society with her technically a minor, Maryon marriage to Brugiere.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth of Color and California's Carceral State: the Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility
    Youth of Color and California’s Carceral State: The Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility Miroslava Chávez-García The Fred C. Nelles Youth Correctional Facility, originally known as Whittier State Downloaded from School when it opened in 1891, lies dormant as a result of massive California state budget cuts in the early 2000s. Though the facility is closed, its history remains alive, intimately tied to the early practices of the emerging carceral state in California. Beginning in the 1910s, with the support of Gov. Hiram Johnson and under the guidance of the progres- sive reformer and newly appointed facility superintendent Fred C. Nelles, Whittier State http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/ School used a rigorous science- and scientific-research-based approach in determining the causes of delinquency among its young incarcerated population. Relying on leading thinkers and practitioners in the nascent fields of psychology, education, social work, and eugenics, state officials implemented the latest tools and techniques—namely, intel- ligence testing and fieldwork—to understand and contain the sources of juvenile crime. To aid in the interpretation of the research, officials also drew on the latest ideas about and ideologies of race, intelligence, heredity, and crime. Those Whittier State School resi- dents classified through this process as “normal” and “borderline normal” remained in by guest on June 17, 2015 the institution and received individualized attention, while those considered beyond the assistance of the program were labeled “feebleminded” and “defective” and farmed out to alternative sites of imprisonment or simply returned home, leaving Nelles with what he considered a group of pliable juvenile inmates.
    [Show full text]
  • EUGENICS in CALIFORNIA, 1896-1945 by Joseph W. Sokolik
    LEADING THE RACE: EUGENICS IN CALIFORNIA, 1896-1945 by Joseph W. Sokolik, B.A. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in History December 2013 Committee Members: Rebecca Montgomery, Chair Anadelia Romo Jeffrey Helgeson COPYRIGHT by Joseph W. Sokolik 2013 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgment. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Joseph W. Sokolik, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to everyone in the Department of History at Texas State University-San Marcos for all of their support and guidance throughout my entire graduate career. To all of my professors, thank you for your constant inspiration. First and foremost, I would like to thank Dr. Rebecca Montgomery for her guidance and advice throughout the writing process. To Dr. Montgomery, Dr. Mary Brennan, Dr. James McWilliams, Dr. Jeff Helgeson, Dr. Ana Romo, Dr. Paul Hart, Dr. Angela Murphy, and Dr. Jesús Francisco de la Teja—you are the best group of educators out there and have deepened my appreciation and love for history, a task that I did not believe possible just a few years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1910-1939) [1]
    Published on The Embryo Project Encyclopedia (https://embryo.asu.edu) The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (1910-1939) [1] By: Lawrence, Cera R. Keywords: Eugenics [2] Reproductive rights [3] From its founding in 1910 until it closed its doors in 1939, the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) aCt old Spring Harbor Laboratory [4] in New York was the center of the American Eugenics Movement. Charles Davenport, a geneticist and biologist, founded the ERO, and served as its director until 1934. Under the direction of Davenport and his associate, superintendant Harry H. Laughlin [5], the influence of the ERO on science and public policy waxed during the early twentieth century until the beginning of World War II. The ERO is important to the history of embryology [6] because it played a key role in the application of scientific theories about heredity to the formulation of social policies about human reproduction. Davenport became the director of the Biological Laboratory at Cold Spring Harbor in 1898. In 1904 he convinced the Carnegie Institution of Washington [7] (CIW) to fund the Station for Experimental Evolution, located on the same campus. Davenport was excited by the potential social benefit of studies in human heredity, as was his wife, Gertrude Crotty Davenport [8], also an embryologist and geneticist. With a grant from Mary Harriman, the widow of railroad magnate Edward Henry Harriman, Davenport founded the Eugenics Record Office in 1910. In 1917, the Carnegie Institution began funding the ERO, and continued to provide its primary funding source until the ERO closed in 1939. John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for SETI: the Social Construction of Aliens and the Quest for a Technological Mythos
    Searching for SETI: The Social Construction of Aliens and the Quest for a Technological Mythos John Marvin Bozeman Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Science and Technology Studies Janet A. Abbate, Co-Chair Shannon A. Brown, Co-Chair Lee L. Zwanziger Paul D. Renard March 24, 2015 Falls Church, Virginia Keywords: Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, SETI, Actor Network Theory, Social Construction of Technology, Rational Choice Theory of Religion, Transhumanism, Xenosalvation Copyright John M. Bozeman Searching for SETI: The Social Construction of Aliens and the Quest for a Technological Mythos John M. Bozeman ABSTRACT This dissertation uses Actor Network Theory (ANT) and Stark and Bainbridge’s rational choice theory of religion to analyze an established but controversial branch of science and technology, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). Of particular interest are the cultural, and sometimes religious, assumptions that its creators have built into it. The purpose of this analysis is not to discredit SETI, but instead to show how SETI, along with other avant-garde scientific projects, is founded, motivated, and propelled by many of the same types of values and visions for the future that motivate the founders of religious groups. I further argue that the utopian zeal found in SETI and similar movements is not aberrant, but instead common, and perhaps necessary, in many early- stage projects, whether technical or spiritual, which lack a clear near-term commercial or social benefit. DEDICATION In memory of my parents, James E.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Efficient Landscape Lighting
    energy efficient landscape lighting OPTIONS FOR COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL SITES June 2008. Casey Gates energy efficient landscape lighting OPTIONS FOR COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL SITES June 2008. A Senior Project Presented to the Faculty of the Landscape Architecture Department University of California, Davis in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Bachelors of Science of Landscape Architecture Accepted and Approved by: __________________________ Faculty Committee Member, Byron McCulley _____________________________ Committee Member, Bart van der Zeeuw _____________________________ Committee Member, Jocelyn Brodeur _____________________________ Faculty Senior Project Advisor, Rob Thayer Casey Gates Acknowledgements THANK YOU Committee Members: Byron McCulley, Jocelyn Brodeur, Bart Van der zeeuw, Rob Thayer Thank you for guiding me through this process. You were so helpful in making sense of my ideas and putting it all together. You are great mentors. Family: Mom, Dad, Kelley, Rusty You inspire me every day. One of my LDA projects 2007 One of my LDA projects 2007, Walker Hall The family Acknowledgements Abstract ENERGY EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE LIGHTING IN COMMERCIAL AND LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL SITES Summary Landscape lighting in commercial and large scale residential sites is an important component to the landscape architecture industry. It is a concept that is not commonly covered in university courses but has a significant impact on the success of a site. This project examines the concepts of landscape lighting and suggests ideas to improve design standards while maintaining energy efficiency. This project will discuss methods and ideas of landscape lighting to improve energy efficiency. Designers should know lighting techniques and their energy efficient alternatives. This project demonstrates how design does not have to be compromised for the sake of energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]