Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 23Rd Annual Round Table

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 23Rd Annual Round Table Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics umber 25, 1972 edited by Roger W. Shut 23rd Annual Round Table Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects Georgetown University School of Languages and Linguistics Report Of The Twenty-Third Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies Roger W. Shuy Editor Georgetown University Press Washington, D.C. 20007 © Copyright 1973 Georgetown University Press School of Languages and Linguistics Georgetown University Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 58-31607 ISBN 0-87840-03-25 CONTENTS Introduction v WELCOMING REMARKS Robert Lado Dean, School of Languages and Linguistics ix FIRST SESSION Chairman: Roger W. Shuy, Georgetown University Bruce Fraser Optional rules in grammar 1 Derek Bickerton The structure of polylectal grammars 17 William Labov Where do grammars stop? 43 Discussion 89 SECOND SESSION Chairman: James E. Alatis, Georgetown University John Gumperz and Eleanor Herasimchuk The conversational analysis of social meaning: a study of classroom interaction 99 Harvey Sacks On some puns with some intimations 135 in iv / CONTENTS THIRD SESSION Chairman: Charles A. Ferguson, Stanford University Joshua A. Fishman The historical dimension in the sociology of language 145 Jyotirindra Das Gupta Language planning and public policy: analytical outline of the policy process related to language planning in India 157 Wilfred Whiteley Sociolinguistic surveys at the national level 167 Discussion 181 FOURTH SESSION Chairman: Richard Thompson, United States Office of Education Aaron V. Cicourel Cross-modal communication: the representational context of sociolinguistic information processing 187 Vera P. John Sociolinguistic perspectives and education 223 Robert Frender and Wallace E. Lambert Speech style and scholastic success: the tentative relationships and possible implications for lower social class children 237 FIFTH SESSION Chairman: Francis P. Dinneen, S. J., Georgetown University Charles Fillmore A grammarian looks to sociolinguistics 273 Allen D. Grimshaw Rules in linguistic, social, and sociolinguistic systems and possibilities for a unified theory 289 Dell Hymes The scope of sociolinguistics 313 Appendix 335 INTRODUCTION The Twenty-Third Annual Georgetown University Round Table was held on March 16-18, 1972. The present volume represents the pro- ceedings of the plenary sessions of that meeting. The theme of the meeting was: 'Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects'. It was with some hesitation that this topic was originally suggested since the development of sociolinguistics is so recent that the committee was not at all certain how widely it would be received. However, the re- sponse to the initial announcement was overwhelming. Fifteen papers were delivered at the five plenary sessions, fourteen of these are made available here. (It is regretted that the presentation by Erving Goff- man will not be included at the author's request.) The formal dis- cussion which was submitted to the editor in writing has been included although general discussion from the floor has been omitted in this year's proceedings. The Sociolinguistics Committee of the Social Science Research Council originally proposed the topic and jointly planned the session with university representatives; members of that committee include Dell Hymes (Chairman), John Gumperz, William Labov, Charles Ferguson, Allen Grimshaw, and David Jenness who worked with the program chairman and devised nine small-group interest sessions which met for three hours each on March 16 and the five plenary sessions which began on the evening of March 16 and extended through noon, March 18. The purpose of the interest groups was to bring together active scholars and advanced graduate students in an inti- mate setting, discussing needed research in specific areas of socio- linguistics and evaluating current progress to date. It was decided that the group size should be limited to 20 when possible. Applicants for admission to the interest groups were requested to reserve space in advance. Interest group leaders, chosen by the planning committee, vi / INTRODUCTION were responsible for selecting their participants from among the applicants. The following interest groups were offered: (1) Ethnographic Semantics. Chairman, Brent Berlin, University of California. (2) Sociolinguistics and Religion. Chairman, William Samarin, University of Toronto. (3) Language Socialization. Chairman, Courtney Cazden, Harvard University. (4) Language Planning. Chairman, Joan Rubin, Stanford University. (5) Social and Ethnic Diversity in the American Speech Community. Chairmen, Roger W. Shuy and Ralph W. Fasold, Georgetown University. (6) Paralinguistics, Kinesics, and Teacher Training. Chairmen, Hugh Mehan, University of California, San Diego, and Bruce Fraser, Boston University. (7) Ethnography of Interrogation. Chairman, Lindsey Churchill, City University of New York. (8) Pidginization and Creolization. Chairman, David DeCamp, University of Texas. (9) Speech Performance and Repertoires. Chairman, Roger Abrahams, University of Texas. The interest groups took quite different formats, ranging from predistributed working papers, which were discussed at the meetings, to a more informal discussion format. Plans have been made to publish the papers of several of these sessions. Georgetown Uni- versity Press will publish the papers which grew out of interest- group sessions four and five, Language Planning: Current Issues and Research, edited by Joan Rubin and Roger W. Shuy and Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects, edited by Roger W. Shuy and Ralph W. Fasold. Reports of these sessions are included as an appendix to this volume. The papers of the plenary session are intended to represent the wide scope of sociolinguistics as it is viewed today. Sociolinguists are concerned with ways of analyzing variability in the writing of grammars and the presentations by Fraser, Bickerton, Labov, and Bailey are addressed to this issue. The relationship of sociolin- guistics to social interaction is the focus of the papers presented by Gumperz and Sacks, while sociolinguistic surveys are the topic of the presentations of Fishman, Das Gupta, Whiteley, and Haugen. The intersection of sociolinguistics with education is another current concern which is addressed by Cicourel, John, and Frender and Lam- bert. In concluding the session, broad overviews of the influence of INTRODUCTION / vii the fields of linguistics and sociology on sociolinguistics are pre- sented by Fillmore and Grimshaw while Hymes summarizes the field in general in the final paper. Soon after the conclusion of the conference, the sad news of the death of Wilfred Whiteley was announced. His presence will be sorely missed by his colleagues and friends. As chairman, I would like to express my thanks to The National Science Foundation and The Social Science Research Council who helped support The Round Table. Specifically, David Jenness of the SSRC provided invaluable assistance along with the Sociolinguistics Committee of the SSRC. I would also like to thank all the graduate students in the Sociolinguistics Program at Georgetown University who provided valuable assistance in the planning and execution of the meetings. In particular, Douglass W. Gordon, the chairman of arrangements, Jan McDonald, departmental secretary, and Mary Lou Shuy, my wife, worked long and hard on hundreds of details. In addition, Marcia Whiteman, Al Rey, Marcel Charland, Jackie Pickett, James Woodward, Faye Vaughn-Cook, Lucienne Skopek, Joe Bellino, Jennifer Sullivan, O. G. Harper, Peg Griffin, Carolyn Bins, Bill Riley, Marilyn Glenn, David Minderhout, Mary Alice Minderhout, Jan Smith, Judy Riley, Elaine Gordon, Mark Connelley, Larry Biondi, Margaret Booth, Emmanuel Chia, Ed Anderson, Suzanne Podvoll, and Maria Ibba are to be thanked for their excellent assist- ance. Special thanks go to Miss Marieluise Baur who prepared photo- copy. Roger W. Shuy Editor WELCOMING REMARKS ROBERT LADO Dean, School of Languages and Linguistics Georgetown University Ladies and Gentlemen, on behalf of Georgetown University I am happy to extend to you a cordial welcome to this the Twenty-Third Annual Georgetown University Round Table. In keeping with a tradition of not being traditional, but rather of exploring the frontiers of scien- tific linguistic and related studies, the topic of this Round Table focuses on the most rapidly developing linguistic field today, that of Socio- linguistics, its trends and prospects. It is easier to say more or less cynically that 'man can travel to the Moon but cannot understand the problems of living with his cultural neighbor', than to do something about creating understand- ing through study, research, and discussion. The vigour, diversity, relevance, and sheer excitement of the field of Sociolinguistics is clearly visible in the topics listed for discussion and the names of the contributors and participants. The result is certain to be greater insight and understanding of the lin- guistic problems we live with, of the invisible webs that so often deny full flight and freedom to the spirit of man. Georgetown University is proud to share sponsorship for this Twenty-Third Round Table with the Committee on Sociolinguistics of the Social Science Research Council. We thank the speakers who have come to share with their col- leagues the results of their labors, and we thank the participants for their contribution to the discussion and for their presence. OPTIONAL RULES IN GRAMMAR BRUCE FRASER Language
Recommended publications
  • ADS Schedule 2019
    American Dialect Society Annual Meeting 2019 New York City, Sheraton New York Times Square Thursday, January 3 Executive Council Room: Sugar Hill Chair: ADS President Sali Tagliamonte (University of Toronto) Time: 1:00 – 3:00 PM Open meeting; all members welcome. Annual Business Meeting Room: Sugar Hill Chair: ADS President Sali Tagliamonte (University of Toronto) Time: 3:00 – 3:30 PM ADS Session 1: University of Toronto Linguists Have Some Things to Tell You About Canadian English Room: Sugar Hill Chair: Alexandra D’Arcy (University of Victoria) 4:00 Lisa Schlegl (University of Toronto): Tracking change in Canadian English utterance-initial discourse markers 4:30 Sali A. Tagliamonte (University of Toronto), Tim Gadanidis (University of Toronto), Jean-François Juneau (University of Toronto), Kinza Mahoon (University of Toronto), Andrei Munteanu (University of Toronto), Lisa Schlegl (University of Toronto), Fiona Wilson (University of Toronto): Sounding like a “Sounder”: dialect accommodation in Ontario, Canada 5:00 Bridget L. Jankowski (University of Toronto), Sali A. Tagliamonte (University of Toronto): “He come out and give me a beer, but he never seen the bear”: old preterites in Ontario dialects 5:30 Derek Denis (University of Toronto Mississauga), Vidhya Elango (University of Toronto Mississauga), Nur Sakinah Nor Kamal (University of Toronto Mississauga), Srishti Prashar (University of Toronto Mississauga), Maria Velasco (University of Toronto Mississauga): Exploring the sounds of Multicultural Toronto English Words of the Year Nominations Room: Sugar Hill Chair: Ben Zimmer (Chair of ADS New Words Committee) Time: 6:15 – 7:15 PM Open meeting of the New Words Committee; ADS members and friends welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Anymore in American English
    Author: Yera Calleja Flores Degree in English Studies 2014-2015 POSITIVE ANYMORE IN AMERICAN ENGLISH Supervisor: Miren Alazne Landa Departamento de Filología Inglesa, Alemana y de Traducción e Interpretación Área de Filología Inglesa Abstract The use of anymore that is more widespread in the English-speaking world is the negative one, that is, an adverb that co-occurs with some negative expression in the clause. However, in some parts of the English-speaking world, anymore is also used in non-negative linguistic contexts. This positive usage of the word anymore that is usually restricted to negative environments has been the focus of study of many researchers. From its meaning to the restrictions that operate on its use, to the socio-cultural distribution, to the way it may evolve in the future, different hypotheses have been proposed through the years. Nevertheless, the random responses given by participants have made it difficult for researchers to validate hypotheses about this non-mainstream usage. This study aims to analyze those hypotheses. First, I examine negation in English and what concerns to the usage of negative anymore. Second, I introduce positive anymore and the two main issues that have been studied about it: different interpretations of positive anymore (i.e. nowadays, lately and from now on) and the debate among linguists on whether there is one unique pan-dialectal anymore or we are talking about two different lexical items. In other words, whether the anymore used in negative and positive sentences is the same lexical item and only differs in meaning and the restrictions that operate on its use depending on the context or, on the contrary, they are independent lexical items with different meanings and restrictions operating on its use.
    [Show full text]
  • ED311449.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 311 449 CS 212 093 AUTHOR Baron, Dennis TITLE Declining Grammar--and Other Essays on the English Vocabulary. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-1073-8 PUB DATE 89 NOTE :)31p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 10738-3020; $9.95 member, $12.95 nonmember). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *English; Gr&mmar; Higher Education; *Language Attitudes; *Language Usage; *Lexicology; Linguistics; *Semantics; *Vocabulary IDENTIFIERS Words ABSTRACT This book contains 25 essays about English words, and how they are defined, valued, and discussed. The book is divided into four sections. The first section, "Language Lore," examines some of the myths and misconceptions that affect attitudes toward language--and towards English in particular. The second section, "Language Usage," examines some specific questions of meaning and usage. Section 3, "Language Trends," examines some controversial r trends in English vocabulary, and some developments too new to have received comment before. The fourth section, "Language Politics," treats several aspects of linguistic politics, from special attempts to deal with the ethnic, religious, or sex-specific elements of vocabulary to the broader issues of language both as a reflection of the public consciousness and the U.S. Constitution and as a refuge for the most private forms of expression. (MS) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY J. Maxwell TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." U S.
    [Show full text]
  • NADS.28.3 September 1996
    Forwarding and Address and Forwarding Correction Requested Correction “13 NEWSLETTER OF THE 3 AMERICAN DIALECT SOCIETY # & H n NADS r cc> C/3 28.3 Vol. 28, No. 3 S e p t e m b e r 1996 2 • DSNA Calls for May Meeting 2 • ADS at ILA in March 3 • Annual Meeting, Chicago 3 • Annual Meeting Workshops 4 • Annual Meeting Program 10 • James McMillan 1907-96 11 • Who We Are, Exactly Insert: Teaching News 21 • NWAVE: The Fine Print 23 • We Still Go to MLA 24 • Regional Meetings This Fall 26 • Our New Books 27 • DARE Queries No. 38 28 • DARE Is Here! (Volume III) NADS is sent in January, May and Sep­ tember to all ADS members. Send ADS dues ($30 per year), queries and news to editor and executive secretary Allan Metcalf, English Department, MacMurray College, Jackson­ ville, Illinois 62650, phone (217) 479-7115 or (217) 243-3403, e-mail [email protected]. ADS Web site: http://www.msstate.edu/Ar- chives/ADS/ ADS-L discussion list: To join, send to [email protected] the message: Sub ADS-L Your Name CALLS FOR PAPERS I DSNA Call: Madison, May I LA Call: Georgetown, March The 11th biennial meeting of the Dictio­ Once again, ADS will sponsor a session at nary Society of North America will be hosted the annual meeting of the International Lin­ by DARE at the University of Wisconsin, guistic Association. “Language Change and Madison, Thursday through Saturday, May Variation” is the theme of the 42nd ILA An­ 29-31. nual Conference, to be held March 7-9 in the For many years, ADS has been happy to Intercultural Center, Georgetown University, designate DSNA as our own official Summer Washington, D.
    [Show full text]
  • "Midwestern and Rural." Wallace's Dialects. New York
    Shapiro, Mary. "Midwestern and Rural." Wallace’s Dialects. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. 135–158. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 1 Oct. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781501348501.0011>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 1 October 2021, 08:17 UTC. Copyright © Mary Shapiro 2020. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Wallace’s Dialects Midwestern and Rural 7 Midwestern and Rural Regional Working Class Southern Midwestern Boston “Dave Wallace” Bruce Green (“Here and ere”) Bloomingtonians (“e View from Mrs. ompson’s”) Ag-People/Carnies/Kmart People (“Getting Away”) Skip Atwater (“e Suering Channel”) Amber Moltke (“e Suering Channel”) Figure 6 Wallace’s Midwesterners. In “Host,” Wallace challenges readers “to try seeing things from the perspective of, say, a God-fearing, hard-working rural-Midwestern military vet” (CTL 288–9). An arrow, from the word “directly” (which Wallace puts in the mouth of this hypothetical construct), leads to a box with a parenthetical side note: “(In the real Midwest, this word is pronounced with a long i)” (289). Neither the accent nor the conservative point of view is mocked; nor is there any implication that a person who speaks this way must have this attitude; the implication is simply that readers can’t really imagine this person, can’t really understand his point of view, unless they hear the words coming out of his mouth. The very concept of a “Middle West” is an early twentieth-century construct, whose borders continue to be disputed (or perhaps continue to evolve).
    [Show full text]
  • Download (1400Kb)
    Manuscript version: Author’s Accepted Manuscript The version presented in WRAP is the author’s accepted manuscript and may differ from the published version or Version of Record. Persistent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/112985 How to cite: Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it. Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher’s statement: Please refer to the repository item page, publisher’s statement section, for further information. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected]. warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications anymore, It’s on Twitter: Positive-Anymore, American Regional Dialects, and Polarity-Licensing in Tweets Abstract Positive-anymore is recognized as a feature of some dialects of English.
    [Show full text]
  • ADS Schedule 2019
    American Dialect Society Annual Meeting 2019 New York City, Sheraton New York Times Square Thursday, January 3 Executive Council Room: Sugar Hill Chair: ADS President Sali Tagliamonte (University of Toronto) Time: 1:00 – 3:00 PM Open meeting; all members welcome. Annual Business Meeting Room: Sugar Hill Chair: ADS President Sali Tagliamonte (University of Toronto) Time: 3:00 – 3:30 PM ADS Session 1: University of Toronto Linguists Have Some Things to Tell You About Canadian English Room: Sugar Hill Chair: Alexandra D’Arcy (University of Victoria) 4:00 Lisa Schlegl (University of Toronto): Tracking change in Canadian English utterance-initial discourse markers 4:30 Sali A. Tagliamonte (University of Toronto), Tim Gadanidis (University of Toronto), Jean-François Juneau (University of Toronto), Kinza Mahoon (University of Toronto), Andrei Munteanu (University of Toronto), Lisa Schlegl (University of Toronto), Fiona Wilson (University of Toronto): Sounding like a “Sounder”: dialect accommodation in Ontario, Canada 5:00 Bridget L. Jankowski (University of Toronto), Sali A. Tagliamonte (University of Toronto): “He come out and give me a beer, but he never seen the bear”: old preterites in Ontario dialects 5:30 Derek Denis (University of Toronto Mississauga), Vidhya Elango (University of Toronto Mississauga), Nur Sakinah Nor Kamal (University of Toronto Mississauga), Srishti Prashar (University of Toronto Mississauga), Maria Velasco (University of Toronto Mississauga): Exploring the sounds of Multicultural Toronto English Words of the Year Nominations Room: Sugar Hill Chair: Ben Zimmer (Chair of ADS New Words Committee) Time: 6:15 – 7:15 PM Open meeting of the New Words Committee; ADS members and friends welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering DARE Language Variation
    Discovering DARE: Linguistic Lessons from the Dictionary of American Regional English Language Variation Teacher’s Manual By Kelly D. Abrams University of Wisconsin-Madison and Trini Stickle Western Kentucky University The Dictionary of American Regional English The University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF READINGS…….…………………………..…………………………………….….iv LIST OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENTS……………….……………………………………….....v LIST OF GENERAL RESOURCES……………….……………………………………….…... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...………………………….……………………………………..….vii INTRODUCTION………………………………………….…………..………………………... 1 DAY 1: LANGUAGE AND DIALECT…………………………...…………………………….. 4 1.A Pre-Instruction Survey.……..………………………………...……………………..10 1.B Grammaticality Judgments.…………………………………...………………….… 13 1.C Levels of Dialect……………………………………………...…………………..... 17 1.D Prescriptive and Descriptive Approaches .………………………………...…...….. 19 1.E How Prescriptive Are You…………………………………………………………. 21 DAY 2: DICTIONARIES.……..…………………………………………………………..…… 23 2.A Anatomy of a Dictionary Entry…………………………………...………………... 28 2.B Comparing Dictionaries.……………………………..…………...………………... 32 2.C Comparing More Dictionaries……………………………………………………… 42 2.D Digging Into DARE…...………………..………………………...………………... 44 DAY 3: REGIONAL DIALECTS....………………………………………………………..….. 46 3.A Arthur Demographics………………………………...…………..…......…………. 48 3.B Arthur Personality Characteristics.……………………...………..…......…………. 50 3.C People and their Speech: Discussion questions…………………………………….. 52 3.D Character Sketch…………………………………………………………………… 55
    [Show full text]
  • Dialects and Developments in American English with a Practical Analysis and Glossary Lenka Škopková
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at University of West Bohemia Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce Dialects and Developments in American English with a practical analysis and glossary Lenka Škopková Plzeň 2014 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Studijní program Filologie Studijní obor Cizí jazyky pro komerční praxi Kombinace angličtina – francouzština Bakalářská práce Dialects and Developments in American English with a practical analysis and glossary Lenka Škopková Vedoucí práce: Bc. Skyland Václav Kobylak Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Plzeň 2014 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci zpracovala samostatně a použila jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. Plzeň, duben 2014 ……………………… I would like to express my thanks to Bc. Skyland Kobylak for his time, patience and valuable comments and suggestions. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1 2 DEVELOPMENT OF AMERICAN ENGLISH ............................. 4 2.1 Historical background ........................................................ 4 2.2 Influence of other languages ............................................. 6 2.2.1 Spanish .......................................................................... 6 2.2.2 French............................................................................ 8 2.2.3 Dutch ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Varieties of English
    5 Regional Varieties of English The regional varieties of American English have been a major focus since at least the early part of the twentieth century, when dialectologists began conducting large-scale surveys of regional dialect forms, particularly the Linguistic Atlas of the United States and Canada launched in 1931. Although the traditional focus on regional variation took a back seat to concerns for social and ethnic dialect diversity for several decades, there has been resurgent interest in the regional dimension of American dialects. The revitalization was buoyed by completion of the six volumes of the Dictionary of American Regional English (Cassidy 1985; Cassidy and Hall 1991, 1996; Hall 2002, 2012, 2014), and by the publication of The Atlas of North American English (Labov, Ash, and Boberg 2006). There are also a number of useful online surveys of regional dialect differences, for example the Cambridge Online Survey of World Englishes which offers immediate visualization of many lexical differences (http://www.tekstlab.uio.no/cambridge), the Yale University Grammatical Diversity Project, which offers views of grammatical dialect differences across North America (http://microsyntax.sites.yale.edu/), and two sources on dialect pronunciations in both US and world Englishes: the International Dialects of English Archive (IDEA), and the George Mason University Speech Accent Archive (http://accent.gmu.edu/). Activity on a number of the traditional Linguistic Atlas projects continues in digital format at the University of Georgia (http://us.english.uga.edu). Linguists have long debated the precise place of regional dialect studies in the overall investigation of language variation, given the fact that traditional studies have concentrated on the geographical distribution of individual words as opposed to overall patterns of language organization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlas of North American English
    The Atlas of North American English ≥ The Atlas of North American English Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change A Multimedia Reference Tool by William Labov Sharon Ash Charles Boberg Mouton de Gruyter Berlin · New York Mouton de Gruyter (formerly Mouton, The Hague) is a Division of Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Țȍ Printed on acid-free paper which falls within the guidelines of the ANSI to ensure permanence and durability. Labov, William. The atlas of North American English : phonetics, pho- nology, and sound change : a multimedia reference tool / by William Labov, Sharon Ash, Charles Boberg. p. cm. ” Copyright 2006 Includes bibliographical references and index. by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin. ISBN-13: 978-3-11-016746-7 (acid-free paper) ISBN-10: 3-11-016746-8 (acid-free paper) All rights reserved, including those of translation into foreign languages. No 1. English language Ϫ North America. 2. English part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any language Ϫ Dialects Ϫ North America. 3. English lan- means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any infor- guage Ϫ Variations Ϫ North America. 4. American- mation storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the isms. 5. Canadianisms. I. Ash, Sharon. II. Boberg, publisher. Charles. III. Title. PE2808.L26 2006 4271.97Ϫdc22 Typesetting; layout of maps, figures and tables 2005027981 Lars Mecklenburg, designato!de, Berlin. Cover design ϩmalsy, martin zech. Photographs by Charles Boberg, Montreal. Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek Printing Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; Tutte Druckerei GmbH, Salzweg.
    [Show full text]
  • Language, Ideology and Identity in Rural Eastern Kentucky
    LANGUAGE, IDEOLOGY AND IDENTITY IN RURAL EASTERN KENTUCKY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Rebecca Dayle Greene August 2010 © 2010 by Rebecca Dayle Greene. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/fh361zh5489 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Penelope Eckert, Co-Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. John Rickford, Co-Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Miyako Inoue I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Meghan Sumner Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format.
    [Show full text]