2017 9 Drexel Citywide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guide to Infection Control in the Healthcare Setting
GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HEALTHCARE SETTING Pneumococcus Author Roman Pallares, MD Imma Grau, MD Chapter Editor Ziad A. Memish, MD, FRCPC, FACP Topic Outline Key Issues Known Facts Controversial Issues Suggested Practice Suggested Practice in Under-Resourced Settings Summary References Chapter last updated: April 2018 KEY ISSUE • Streptococcus pneumoniae (Pneumococcus) remains a major pathogen worldwide, mainly in young children (<5 years), adults with immunosuppressive or chronic diseases as well as smokers and alcohol abusers, and older adults (≥65 years). Pneumococcal disease is more common in developing countries and occurs more often during winter. In recent years, important changes in the epidemiology of pneumococcal infections have been observed: 1. The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant pneumococci which make invasive pneumococcal infections (e.g., meningitis) difficult to treat. 2. The increased prevalence of pneumococcal disease in the elderly and in patients with chronic and serious underlying conditions (e.g., HIV, malignancies). 3. The increasing recognition of pneumococcal infections in patients admitted to healthcare institutions and nursing homes, childcare centers, and other closed institutions (e.g., jails, military camps). Several of these infections appeared as outbreaks due to antibiotic- resistant pneumococci. 4. In the years 2000s, there was a reduction in the incidence of pneumococcal infections after the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (7-valent “PCV7”, 10-valent “PCV10”, and 13- valent “PCV13”) in children. • Most pneumococcal infections are considered community-acquired infections, and little attention has been paid to nosocomial and healthcare-associated pneumococcal infections. In addition, infection control measures for preventing pneumococcal infections in hospital and healthcare settings and nursing home facilities have not been widely considered in the literature. -
Thoracic Actinomycosis P
Thorax (1973), 28, 73. Thoracic actinomycosis P. R. SLADE, B. V. SLESSER, and J. SOUTHGATE Groby Road Hospital, Leicester Six cases of pulmonary infection with Actinomyces Israeli and one case of infection with Nocardia asteroides are described. The incidence of thoracic actinomycosis has declined recently and the classical presentation with chronic discharging sinuses is now uncommon. The cases described illustrate some of the forms which the disease may take. Actinomycotic infection has been noted, not infrequently, to co-exist with bronchial carcinoma and a case illustrating this association is described. Sputum cytology as practised for the diagnosis of bronchial carcinoma has helped to identify the fungi in the sputum. Treatment is discussed, particularly the possible use of oral antibiotics rather than penicillin by injection. Actinomycosis is not common in this country. showed only submucosal fibrosis. Cytological exam- The Table shows the number of cases reported to ination of the sputum showed the presence of fungus Health Laboratory Service from public (Figs 2 and 3) and cultures gave a growth of the Public Actinomyces Israeli. The patient was hypersensitive to health and hospital laboratories in the United penicillin and was treated with oral tetracycline, 2 g Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in recent years. daily for six months. There was marked reduction It is usually considered that the chest may be in the shadowing on the chest film after only six involved in about 15% of cases (Cecil and Loeb, weeks of treatment (Fig. 4) and subsequently com- 1963). But, of the 36 cases reported in 1970, the plete disappearance. The patient has remained well chest was involved in only one case. -
Quantitative Sputum Culture As a Means of Excluding False Positive Reports in the Routine Microbiology Laboratory
J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.25.8.697 on 1 August 1972. Downloaded from J. clin. Path., 1972, 25, 697-700 Quantitative sputum culture as a means of excluding false positive reports in the routine microbiology laboratory M. J. B. WILSON AND D. E. MARTIN From the Department of Microbiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia SYNOPSIS A relatively simple technique for sputum homogenization and dilution is described. Results show that this technique is reliable for isolation and quantitative culture of organisms from cases of chest infection. The technique has resulted in significant reduction in false positive reports, particularly when a system of interpretative reporting is utilized based on 107 organisms per millilitre of sputum being accepted as evidence of significant infection. The bacteriology of human excretions, particularly A critical analysis of sputum culture results from sputum and urine, has given rise to considerable our laboratory showed that there was frequently a difficulties in interpretation. Kass (1957) contributed good growth of a potential pathogen when clinical much to the better understanding of the significance evidence for infection was equivocal and there was a of non-catheter urine culture when he introduced the tendency for the laboratory to make an excessive copyright. concept of colony counts, in an effort to distinguish number of false positive reports using standard between infected urine and urine from normal culture methods. These false positive reports are persons contaminated by urethral flora. Lower misleading and make it difficult to manage cases respiratory tract infections may likewise show a effectively, and they may lead to unwarranted and heavy growth of commensal organisms, because of undesirable antibiotic usage. -
Reactive Arthritis This Sheet Has Been Written for People Affected by Reactive Arthritis
ARTHRIINFORMATIONTI SHEETS ARTHRIINFORMATIONTI SHEETS Reactive arthritis This sheet has been written for people affected by reactive arthritis. It provides general information to help you understand how you may be affected. This sheet also covers how reactive arthritis usually resolves over time. What is reactive arthritis? It is not known why some people who get these Reactive arthritis is a condition that causes infections develop reactive arthritis and some do not. inflammation, pain and swelling of the joints. It usually A certain gene called HLA-B27 is associated with develops after an infection, often in the bowel or genital reactive arthritis, especially inflammation of the spine. areas. The infection causes activity in the immune However this is a perfectly normal gene and there are system. The normal role of your body’s immune system many more people who have this gene and do not get is to fight off infections to keep you healthy. In some reactive arthritis. people this activity of the immune system causes joints to become inflamed, however the joints themselves How is it diagnosed? are not actually infected. About one in 10 people with Your doctor will diagnose reactive arthritis from your specific types of infections will get reactive arthritis. symptoms and a physical examination. Your doctor may also order blood tests for inflammation, such as the What are the symptoms? erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive Reactive arthritis usually begins a few weeks after an protein (CRP) tests. Blood tests may also help to rule infection. Symptoms can affect many parts of the body out other types of arthritis. -
Confidential
CONFIDENTIAL CHILD’S MEDICAL INFORMATION The following is important information about my child’s medical condition and how the condition may affect their ability to fully participate in a regular school setting. The goal is to try to normalize every day school routines/activities while also meeting my child’s unique needs in the least disruptive manner. This document is not intended to replace any existing Individual Educational Plan (IEP) or the 504 Plan, but rather to serve as a supplement or addendum to enhance my child’s education. Medical information will be updated at the beginning of each new school year and throughout the school year as deemed necessary. “We may not look sick, but turn our bodies inside out and they will tell different stories.” Wade Sutherland CHILD’S NAME: ____________________________________________________________________________ ACADEMIC YEAR: _____________________GRADE: __________DOB: __________________AGE: _________ HOME ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________________________ PARENT/LEGAL GUARDIAN: ________________________________________________________________ PARENT/LEGAL GUARDIAN CONTACT NUMBER: ______________________________________________ SCHOOL: ________________________________________________________________________________ EMERGENCY CONTACT (2 PEOPLE) NAME: __________________________________________________________________________________ RELATIONSHIP: ____________________________ PHONE NUMBER: ________________________________ NAME: __________________________________________________________________________________ -
Specimen Collection: Sputum (Home Health Care) - CE
Specimen Collection: Sputum (Home Health Care) - CE ALERT Don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) based on the patient’s signs and symptoms and indications for isolation precautions. Bronchospasm or laryngospasm, as a result of suctioning, can be severe and prolonged, and, in some cases, can be life-threatening without intervention. OVERVIEW Sputum is produced by cells that line the respiratory tract. Although production is minimal in the healthy patient, disease processes can increase the amount or change the character of sputum. Examination of sputum aids in the diagnosis and treatment of many conditions such as bronchitis, bronchiectasis, tuberculosis (TB), pneumonia, and pulmonary abscess, or lung cancer.3 In many cases, suctioning is indicated to collect sputum from a patient who cannot spontaneously produce a sample for laboratory analysis. Suctioning may provoke violent coughing, induce vomiting, and result in aspiration of stomach contents. Suctioning may also induce constriction of the pharyngeal, laryngeal, and bronchial muscles. In addition, suctioning may cause hypoxemia or vagal overload, causing cardiopulmonary compromise and an increase in intracranial pressure. Sputum for cytology, culture and sensitivity, and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) are three major types of sputum specimens.3 Cytologic or cellular examination of sputum may identify aberrant cells or cancer. Sputum collected for culture and sensitivity testing can be used to identify specific microorganisms and determine which antibiotics are the most sensitive. The AFB smear is used to support a diagnosis of TB. A definitive diagnosis of TB also requires a sputum culture and sensitivity.3 Regardless of the test ordered, a sputum specimen should be collected first thing in the morning due to a greater accumulation of bronchial secretions overnight. -
11736 Lab Req Red-Blue
3550 W. Peterson Ave., Ste. 100 ACCOUNT: Chicago, Illinois 60659 Tel: 773-478-6333 Fax: 773-478-6335 LABORATORY REQUISITION PATIENT NAME - LAST FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL PATIENT IDENTIFICATION SOCIAL SECURITY NO. DATE OF BIRTH SEX N O I NAME OF INSURED SS# OF INSURED RELATIONSHIP TO PATIENT T A M R O PATIENT/INSURED ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER MEDICARE NO. (INCLUDING ALPHA CHARACTERS) F Please attach an ABN form. N I G N CITY STATE ZIP CODE I L L I MEDICAID NO. B BILL I PHYSICIAN I PATIENT I MEDICARE I MEDICAID I INSURANCE (attach copy of both sides of card) TO ACCOUNT DIAGNOSIS (CD-9 CODE(S)) (REQUIRED FOR 3RD PARTY BILLING) PLEASE WRITE PATIENT’S NAME ON ALL SPECIMENS DATE COLLECTED COLLECTED BY AM DR. NAME / NPI # DR. OR RN SIGNATURE PM 001 GENERAL HEALTH PROFILE ( Male ) - CBC, CMP, LIPID, TSH, FT4, TT3, FERRITIN, PSA, H-PYLORI, MAG, ESR, UA, IRON/TIBC SST, L, U 002 GENERAL HEALTH PROFILE ( Female ) - CBC, CMP, LIPID, TSH, FT4, TT3, FERRITIN, H-PYLORI, MAG, ESR, UA, IRON/TIBC SST, L, U 003 AMENOR/MENSTR. DISORDER - CMP, LIPID, CBC, TSH, FT4, TT3, ESR, IRON/TIBC, FERRITIN, MAG, UA, HCG, FSH, LH, PROLACTIN, RET COUNT SST, L, U 004 ANEMIA - CMP, LIPID, IRON/TIBC, CBC, FERRITIN, TSH, FT4, TT3, H-PYLORI, UA, G6PD, RET COUNT SST, L, U 005 ARTHRITIS - CMP, LIPID, CBC, URIC ACID, ESR, ASO, CRP, ANA, RH, SLE SST, L, U 006 DIABETES - CMP, LIPID, CBC, HBA1C, CORTISOL, TSH, FT4, TT3, UA, RET COUNT SST, L, U 007 HEPATITIS - HAAB IGM, HBCAB IGM, HBSAB, HBSAG, HCAB, SGOT, SGPT SST 008 HYPERTENSION/CARDIAC - CMP, LIPID, CBC, TSH, FT4, TT3, IRON/TIBC, CPK, CORTISOL, -
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery
SURGICAL INFECTIONS Volume 14, Number 1, 2013 Surgical Infection Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.9999 Society Guidelines Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery Dale W. Bratzler,1 E. Patchen Dellinger,2 Keith M. Olsen,3 Trish M. Perl,4 Paul G. Auwaerter,5 Maureen K. Bolon,6 Douglas N. Fish,7 Lena M. Napolitano,8 Robert G. Sawyer,9 Douglas Slain,10 James P. Steinberg,11 and Robert A. Weinstein12 hese guidelines were developed jointly by the Ameri- the project. Panel members and contractors were required to Tcan Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), the disclose any possible conflicts of interest before their ap- Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Surgical pointment and throughout the guideline development pro- Infection Society (SIS), and the Society for Healthcare Epide- cess. Drafted documents for each surgical procedural section miology of America (SHEA). This work represents an update were reviewed by the expert panel and, once revised, were to the previously published ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on available for public comment on the ASHP website. After Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery [1], as well as guide- additional revisions were made to address reviewer com- lines from IDSA and SIS [2,3]. The guidelines are intended to ments, the final document was approved by the expert panel provide practitioners with a standardized approach to the and the boards of directors of the above-named organizations. rational, safe, and effective use of antimicrobial agents for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) based on currently Strength of evidence and grading of recommendations available clinical evidence and emerging issues. -
Anaphylaxis During the Perioperative Period
REVIEW ARTICLE Anaphylaxis During the Perioperative Period David L. Hepner, MD*, and Mariana C. Castells, MD, PhD† *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and †Allergy and Clinical Immunology Training Program, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts Anesthesiologists use a myriad of drugs during the provi- perioperative period. Symptoms may include all organ sion of an anesthetic. Many of these drugs have side ef- systems and present with bronchospasm and cardiovas- fects that are dose related, and some lead to severe cular collapse in the most severe cases. Management of immune-mediated adverse reactions. Anaphylaxis is the anaphylaxis includes discontinuation of the presumptive most severe immune-mediated reaction; it generally oc- drug (or latex) and anesthetic, aggressive pulmonary and curs on reexposure to a specific antigen and requires the cardiovascular support, and epinephrine. Although a se- release of proinflammatory mediators. Anaphylactoid re- rum tryptase confirms the diagnosis of an anaphylactic actions occur through a direct non-immunoglobulin reaction, the offending drug can be identified by skin- E-mediated release of mediators from mast cells or from prick, intradermal testing, or serologic testing. Prevention complement activation. Muscle relaxants and latex of recurrences is critical to avoid mortality and morbidity. account for most cases of anaphylaxis during the (Anesth Analg 2003;97:1381–95) he term “anaphylaxis” was coined by Nobel reactions in which immune-complex formation and dep- prize recipients Portier and Richet (1) in 1902, osition leads to tissue damage (3). Anaphylactoid reac- T when they described a dog that had tolerated a tions occur through a direct nonimmune-mediated re- previous injection of actinotoxin, a jellyfish toxin, but lease of mediators from mast cells and/or basophils or reacted with bronchial spasm, cardiorespiratory ar- result from direct complement activation, but they rest, and death to a smaller dose 14 days later. -
Reactive Arthritis
PATIENT FACT SHEET Reactive Arthritis Reactive arthritis is an inflammatory disease that Most often, these bacterial infections are in the genitals occurs in reaction to infections by certain bacteria. or bowels, including the sexually transmitted infection Arthritis may show up a month after the infection. Once Chlamydia trachomatis, and bowel infections like called Reiter’s syndrome, it is a “spondyloarthropathy.” Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia. Reactive arthritis often affects men between 20 and CONDITION 50. It’s usually short in duration, but can be chronic in some people. DESCRIPTION Reactive arthritis symptoms include pain and swelling discharge from the genitals, but a urine or genital swab in knees, ankles or heels; severe swelling of toes or test can show signs of this infection. Bowel infections fingers; and persistent lower back pain that tends to may cause diarrhea. be more severe at night or in the morning. It may cause Most people with these very common infections irritated, red eyes, burning during urination, or a rash on don’t get reactive arthritis. People who test positive for the palms or soles of the feet. the HLA-B27 gene may be at higher risk for severe or To diagnose reactive arthritis, a rheumatologist may chronic arthritis, but those who test negative may get SIGNS/ look for these symptoms as well as signs of the original reactive arthritis too. People with weakened immune SYMPTOMS infection. Chlamydia may cause watery or pus-like systems from HIV or AIDS may develop reactive arthritis. Effective treatments are available for reactive arthritis. Later-stage, or chronic reactive arthritis, may be It is treated according to how far the disease has treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs progressed. -
Antimicrobial Treatment Guidelines for Common Infections
Antimicrobial Treatment Guidelines for Common Infections March 2019 Published by: The NB Provincial Health Authorities Anti-infective Stewardship Committee under the direction of the Drugs and Therapeutics Committee Introduction: These clinical guidelines have been developed or endorsed by the NB Provincial Health Authorities Anti-infective Stewardship Committee and its Working Group, a sub- committee of the New Brunswick Drugs and Therapeutics Committee. Local antibiotic resistance patterns and input from local infectious disease specialists, medical microbiologists, pharmacists and other physician specialists were considered in their development. These guidelines provide general recommendations for appropriate antibiotic use in specific infectious diseases and are not a substitute for clinical judgment. Website Links For Horizon Physicians and Staff: http://skyline/patientcare/antimicrobial For Vitalité Physicians and Staff: http://boulevard/FR/patientcare/antimicrobial To contact us: [email protected] When prescribing antimicrobials: Carefully consider if an antimicrobial is truly warranted in the given clinical situation Consult local antibiograms when selecting empiric therapy Include a documented indication, appropriate dose, route and the planned duration of therapy in all antimicrobial drug orders Obtain microbiological cultures before the administration of antibiotics (when possible) Reassess therapy after 24-72 hours to determine if antibiotic therapy is still warranted or effective for the given organism -
S. Pneumoniae + Legionella Detection Kit
S. pneumoniae + Legionella detection kit Pathogen and product description Gram positive bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae antimicrobial therapy is institutedted earlearly.y. KKnownnown is one of the most important pathogen that risk factors include immunosuppression,pressiiitton, ccigaretteigarette affects mainly children and elderly and can smoking, alcohol consumption andditt concomitant cause life-threatening diseases. Streptococcus pulmonary disease. Legionella pneumophila is pneumoniae infection leads to many clinical responsible for 80-90% of reported cases of manifestations including meningitis, septicaemia, Legionella infection with serogroup 1 accounting bacteraemia, pneumonia, acute otitis media and for greater than 70% of all legionellosis. sinusitis. Pneumococcal infection annually has CerTest Streptococcus pneumoniae + Legionella caused approximately 14.5 million cases of invasive one step card test offers a simple and highly pneumococcal disease (IPD) and 0.7-1 million sensitive assay to make a presumptive diagnosis deaths in children under five years old, mostly in of pneumoniae and/or Legionella caused by developing and underdeveloped countries. Streptococcus pneumoniae and/or Legionella Legionnaires’ Disease is caused by Legionella pneumophila in infected humans from urine samples. pneumophila and is characterized as an acute febrile respiratory illness ranging in severity from mild illness to fatal pneumonia. The resulting mortality rate, ranging from 25 to 40% can be lowered if the disease is diagnosed rapidly and appropriate S. pneumoniae + Legionella detection kit Test procedure step 1 Using a separate testing tube or vial for each sample, step 2 Add 2 drops of Reagent step 3 Use a separate pipette and device for each sample or add 6 drops of urine sample. into the testing tube or vial control.