DOCSLIB.ORG

Malpai Borderlands Group Habitat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Malpai Borderlands Group Habitat United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer to: AESO/SE 22410-2006-F-0408 August 12, 2008 Memorandum To: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico (ARD-ES) (Attn: Susan Jacobsen) State Conservationist, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona State Conservationist, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological and Conference Opinion on the Malpai Borderlands Habitat Conservation Plan, Arizona and New Mexico This biological and conference opinion (BCO) responds to the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) requirement for intra-Service consultation on the proposed issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit (TE-15587-0) to the Malpai Borderlands Group (MBG), pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act), authorizing the incidental take of 19 covered species. Along with the permit application, MBG submitted a draft of the Malpai Borderlands Habitat Conservation Plan (MBHCP). On August 30, 2007, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) requested programmatic consultation for their funding and implementation of NRCS conservation practices: fire management – Prescribed fire (code 338), erosion control – Grade Stabilization (code 410), mechanical brush control-Brush Management (code 314), and construction and maintenance of linear facilities – Access Road (code 560), Fence (382), and Pipeline (code 516) that are covered activities in the MBHCP and would be implemented within the covered area of the MBHCP . This BCO covers those portions of the NRCS conservation practices that are consistent with the MBHCP covered activities. NRCS will implement all minimization measures that are associated with covered activities in the MBHCP to minimize incidental take of listed species and covered species, as applicable. The MBHCP permit 2 area covers non-Federal lands in the southeastern corner of Cochise County, Arizona and the southwestern corner of Hidalgo County, New Mexico (See Figure 1). This BCO analyzes the potential effects that issuance of this permit may have on the threatened Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates [=Rana] chiricahuensis), threatened beautiful shiner (Cyprinella formosa) with critical habitat, threatened Yaqui catfish (Ictalurus pricei) with critical habitat, endangered Yaqui chub (Gila purpurea) with critical habitat, endangered Yaqui topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis sonoriensis), endangered Huachuca water umbel (Lilaeopsis schaffneriana var. recurva) with critical habitat, threatened Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) with critical habitat, and threatened New Mexico ridge-nosed rattlesnake (Crotalus willardi obscurus) with critical habitat. We analyze the potential effects that issuance of this permit may have on the nonessential experimental population of northern aplomado falcon (Falco femoralis), candidate western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus), and the unlisted Yaqui sucker (Catostomus bernardini), Mexican longfin dace (Agosia chrysogaster), Mexican stoneroller (Campostoma ornatum), lowland leopard frog (Lithobates yavapaiensis), northern Mexican gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops), black-tailed prairie dog (Cynomys ludovicianus), western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea), white-sided jackrabbit (Lepus callotis), and western red bat (Lasiurus blosseveillii). Consistent with our policies concerning intra-service consultations, for the purposes of this opinion, we will treat these species herein as if they were proposed for listing as threatened or endangered. We determined that this action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the threatened Cochise pincushion cactus (Coryphantha robbinsorum), endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax trailli extimus) with critical habitat, endangered lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris curasoae yerbabuenae), endangered Mexican long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris nivalis), and endangered jaguar (Panthera onca). Concurrences with the determinations on these species are in Appendix A. We further determined that this action will have no effect on the endangered Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupis baileyi) because they are not known or reasonably certain to occur within the action area during the term of the permit. This BCO is based on information provided in the draft MBHCP dated June 27, 2007; the draft Environmental Assessment (EA) dated June 27, 2007; telephone conversations; field investigations; FWS files; and other sources of information. Literature cited in this BCO is not a complete bibliography of all literature available on the species of concern, the activities covered in the Agreement and their effects, or on other subjects considered in this opinion. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file in the Arizona Ecological Services Office (AESO). We appreciate the assistance of the NRCS Office in Douglas, Arizona, the San Bernardino/Leslie Canyon National Wildlife Refuge in Douglas, Arizona, and the New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office in Albuquerque, New Mexico for assistance in preparing this document. If there are any question concerning this BCO, please contact Marty Tuegel (520) 670-6150 x232, Sherry Barrett x223, or me. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSULTATION HISTORY ....................................................................................................... 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION .......................................................................... 6 STATUS OF THE SPECIES .......................................................................................................... 9 AQUATIC SPECIES .................................................................................................................. 9 Chiricahua leopard frog ........................................................................................................... 9 Huachuca water umbel ........................................................................................................... 11 Lowland leopard frog ............................................................................................................. 12 Northern Mexican gartersnake ............................................................................................... 15 Yaqui Fish - listed .................................................................................................................. 16 Yaqui Fish - unlisted .............................................................................................................. 21 GRASSLAND SPECIES .......................................................................................................... 24 Northern aplomado falcon ..................................................................................................... 24 Black-tailed prairie dog .......................................................................................................... 28 Western burrowing owl.......................................................................................................... 30 White-sided jackrabbit ........................................................................................................... 31 MONTANE SPECIES .............................................................................................................. 33 Mexican spotted owl .............................................................................................................. 33 New Mexico ridge-nosed rattlesnake ..................................................................................... 37 RIPARIAN SPECIES ............................................................................................................... 38 Western red bat ...................................................................................................................... 38 Western yellow-billed cuckoo ............................................................................................... 40 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE............................................................................................ 41 ACTION AREA........................................................................................................................ 41 AQUATIC SPECIES ................................................................................................................ 42 Chiricahua leopard frog ......................................................................................................... 42 Huachuca water umbel ........................................................................................................... 45 Lowland leopard frog ............................................................................................................. 45 Northern Mexican gartersnake ............................................................................................... 47 Yaqui Fish - listed .................................................................................................................. 47 Yaqui Fish – unlisted ............................................................................................................. 49 GRASSLAND SPECIES .......................................................................................................... 50 Northern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana Chiricahuensis)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Final Recovery Plan April 2007 CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Rana chiricahuensis) RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director, or Director, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM. 149 pp. + Appendices A-M. Additional copies may be obtained from: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Southwest Region 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 500 Gold Avenue, S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • I GEOSPATIAL SYNTHESIS of GRASSLANDS CONSERVATION
    GEOSPATIAL SYNTHESIS OF GRASSLANDS CONSERVATION INFORMATION Final Report – Sept 30, 2016 Prepared for: Desert Landscape Conservation Cooperative c/o Matthew Grabau Science Coordinator Prepared by: Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Maureen D. Correll Allison Shaw Adrián Quero Arvind Panjabi Greg Levandoski Primary Contact: Maureen Correll 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, Colorado 80603 [email protected] Suggested citation: Correll, M.D., Shaw, A., Quero, A., Panjabi, A.O., and Levandoski, G. 2016. Geospatial synthesis of grasslands conservation information. Final report. Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, Brighton, Colorado, USA. i BIRD CONSERVANCY OF THE ROCKIES Mission: conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Goals 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education
    [Show full text]
  • Cowboywesterncatalog 2018.Pdf
    Table of Contents Themes............................................................................................................1-72 Cowboys and the Wild West........................................................................................................... 1-72 New for 2018.......................................................................................................................................................... 1-8 Backlist Titles........................................................................................................................................................9-51 Music and DVD's................................................................................................................................................ 52-61 Posters, Prints, Greeting Cards......................................................................................................................... 62-69 Games and Puzzles.............................................................................................................................................70-71 Edibles.....................................................................................................................................................................72 Price & Product Availability Subject to Change Without Notice Themes Cowboys and the Wild West, New for 2018 101 Things to Do A Night on the Back Page: The with a Dutch Oven Range Best Of Baxter Dutch oven cooking has The cowboy life isn't easy. Black From Western long been popular
    [Show full text]
  • The Malpai Borderlands Group
    Collaboration in the Borderlands: The Malpai Borderlands Group Item Type text; Article Authors Allen, Larry S. Citation Allen, L. S. (2006). Collaboration in the borderlands: the Malpai borderlands group. Rangelands, 28(3), 17-21. DOI 10.2111/1551-501X(2006)28[17:CITBTM]2.0.CO;2 Publisher Society for Range Management Journal Rangelands Rights Copyright © Society for Range Management. Download date 29/09/2021 16:36:54 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/639616 Collaboration in the Borderlands: The Malpai Borderlands Group After 10 years of efforts to preserve the open spaces and way of life of the Borderlands Region, the Malpai Borderlands Group is now internationally recognized as an outstanding example of collaborative planning and management of large landscapes. By Larry S. Allen Roots of Change community in New Mexico to join in the discussions, and several points of agreement were discovered. Strongest agreement was in the areas of preservation of open space and As our society is now increasingly polarized on the issues the need to restore fire as a functioning ecological process. It of natural resource use and protection of the environment, was agreed that livestock grazing requires open space and we endeavor to be at the Radical Center. —Bill McDonald that preservation of the ranching industry is important to prevent habitat fragmentation. The Malpai Planning Area includes 2 valleys at an eleva- arly in the 1990s, several neighbors along the tion of about 4,000 feet, which support semidesert grassland Mexican border in Southeastern Arizona and and Chihuahuan desert scrub; 1 higher grassland valley Southwestern New Mexico began to meet period- (about 5,000 feet) with plains grassland; and 2 mountain ically at Warner and Wendy Glenn’s Malpai ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasslands Ecosystems, Endangered Agriculture Species, and Sustainable Ranching Forest Service in the Mexico-U.S
    United States Department of Grasslands Ecosystems, Endangered Agriculture Species, and Sustainable Ranching Forest Service in the Mexico-U.S. Borderlands: Rocky Mountain Research Station Conference Proceedings Proceedings RMRS-P-40 Ecosistemas de Pastizales, Especies en June 2006 Peligro y Ganadería Sostenible en Tierras Fronterizas de México- Estados Unidos: Conferencia Transcripciõnes Basurto, Xavier; Hadley, Diana, eds. 2006. Grasslands ecosystems, endangered species, and sustainable ranching in the Mexico-U.S. borderlands: Conference proceedings. RMRS-P-40. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 126 p. Abstract The semi-arid grasslands in the Mexico-United States border region are relatively intact and provide one of the best opportunities in North America to preserve and nurture an extensive series of grassland ecosystems. The conference was organized to increase appreciation for the importance of the remaining semi-arid grasslands and to create a platform for expanding the integration of natural and social sciences among individuals and organizations. The conference was attended by ranchers, environmentalists, academics, and agency personnel from both nations. Main topics include grassland ecology and biodiversity, management and conservation, and sustainable borderland ranching. Endangered species management, especially of black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus), was an important topic. Oral presentations were in English or Spanish, with simultaneous translations, and the papers have been printed in both languages. The conference revealed the ties between ecological processes and environmental conditions in the Borderland grasslands and the cultural and economic priorities of the human communities who depend on them. This recognition should enable interested people and groups to work together to achieve satisfactory solutions to the challenges of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands
    Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands David Gori, Gitanjali S. Bodner, Karla Sartor, Peter Warren and Steven Bassett September 2012 Animas Valley, New Mexico Photo: TNC Preferred Citation: Gori, D., G. S. Bodner, K. Sartor, P. Warren, and S. Bassett. 2012. Sky Island Grassland Assessment: Identifying and Evaluating Priority Grassland Landscapes for Conservation and Restoration in the Borderlands. Report prepared by The Nature Conservancy in New Mexico and Arizona. 85 p. i Executive Summary Sky Island grasslands of central and southern Arizona, southern New Mexico and northern Mexico form the “grassland seas” that surround small forested mountain ranges in the borderlands. Their unique biogeographical setting and the ecological gradients associated with “Sky Island mountains” add tremendous floral and faunal diversity to these grasslands and the region as a whole. Sky Island grasslands have undergone dramatic vegetation changes over the last 130 years including encroachment by shrubs, loss of perennial grass cover and spread of non-native species. Changes in grassland composition and structure have not occurred uniformly across the region and they are dynamic and ongoing. In 2009, The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) launched its Sky Island Grassland Initiative, a 10-year plan to protect and restore grasslands and embedded wetland and riparian habitats in the Sky Island region. The objective of this assessment is to identify a network of priority grassland landscapes where investment by the Foundation and others will yield the greatest returns in terms of restoring grassland health and recovering target wildlife species across the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest NM Publication List
    Southwest New Mexico Publication Inventory Draft Source of Document/Search Purchase Topic Category Keywords County Title Author Date Publication/Journal/Publisher Type of Document Method Price Geology 1 Geology geology, seismic Southwestern NM Six regionally extensive upper-crustal Ackermann, H.D., L.W. 1994 U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 94- Electronic file USGS publication search refraction profiles, seismic refraction profiles in Southwest New Pankratz, D.P. Klein 695 (DJVU) http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/ southwestern New Mexico ofr/ofr94695 Mexico, 2 Geology Geology, Southwestern NM Magmatism and metamorphism at 1.46 Ga in Amato, J.M., A.O. 2008 In New Mexico Geological Society Fall Field Paper in Book http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/g $45.00 magmatism, the Burro Mountains, southwestern New Boullion, and A.E. Conference Guidebook - 59, Geology of the Gila uidebooks/59/ metamorphism, Mexico Sanders Wilderness-Silver City area, 107-116. Burro Mountains, southwestern New Mexico 3 Geology Geology, mineral Catron County Geology and mineral resources of York Anderson, O.J. 1986 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Electronic file (PDF) NMBGMR search $10.00 for resources, York Ranch SE quadrangle, Cibola and Catron Resources Open File Report 220A, 22 pages. <http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publicatio CD Ranch, Fence Counties, New Mexico ns/openfile/details.cfml?Volume=2 Lake, Catron, 20A> Cibola 4 Geology Geology, Zuni Salt Catron County Geology of the Zuni Salt Lake 7 1/2 Minute Anderson, O.J. 1994 New Mexico Bureau of Mines and
    [Show full text]
  • State of Idaho
    STATE OF IDAHO CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES OF CANDIDATES FOR STATEWIDE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL OFFICE and POLITICAL COMMITTEES January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2006 and LOBBYIST EXPENDITURES 2005 - 2006 COMPILED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BEN YSURSA SECRETARY OF STATE STATE OF IDAHO OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE BEN YSURSA Dear Citizens of Idaho: This report is the fourteenth compilation of the campaign disclosure and lobbyist expenditure reports filed pursuant to the "Sunshine Law." The purpose of this report is to disseminate the information in our files to the public in an easily accessible form. We would hope that this compilation will play an integral part in achieving the ultimate goal of the Sunshine Law - - Public Disclosure. In that regard I invite you to visit our elections website at www.sos.idaho.gov to access further campaign information. We invite and appreciate your suggestions for improving this report. Sincerely, BEN YSURSA Secretary of State P.O. Box 83720, Boise, Idaho 83720-0080 Elections Telephone: (208) 334-2852, FAX: (208) 334-2282 Located at 304 North 8th, Ste. 149 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction...................................................................iii Definitions.....................................................................iv SECTION I: Total Amount of Contributions and Expenditures Unopposed Candidates in 2006 ................................... 1 Statewide Candidates................................................... 2 District Judge Candidates............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Green Chaney] 1 TALES: Legends [Outlaws?]
    Library of Congress [Thomas Green Chaney] 1 TALES: Legends [Outlaws?] Range-lore Ruby Mosley San Angelo, Texas. Interview Page one RANGE-LORE Thomas Green Chaney was born in Hunt County in 1864. His family drifted from one section to another farming a year here and there until they settled in Comanche County. Here he met Miss [Donyanna?] Poynor and later married her. She was the daughter of W.J. (Bill) Poynor, an old Indian fighter. In later years he moved to the Concho County and has lived here since. C12 - 2/11/41 - Texas “I went up the trail three different years, 2 says Thomas Green Chaney. “Each time we took cattle to Yellow House Canyon, out on the plains, near New Mexico to the X.I.T. outfit. This trail work was done for H. R. Martin and G. A. Beeman Company, Comanche County. “One year, old Burley Taylor was boss of the trail outfit and Charlie Bryson, Jim [Doston?], John Bryson and I went with him. We had about 3,500 steers in the herd. We got everything ready and the chuck wagon started on ahead. About three days after we left Comanche County we got everything bedded down for the night. Two of the boys kept guard while we slept. I always liked to sleep under the wagon and got ny bunk roll and tucked in before someone beat me to it. [Thomas Green Chaney] http://www.loc.gov/resource/wpalh3.36071806 Library of Congress “I had just stretched out when good an old cow gave a snort, [loap?] and bawl.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Timing of the Largescale Stoneroller, Campostoma Oligolepis, in the Flint River, Alabama
    REPRODUCTIVE TIMING OF THE LARGESCALE STONEROLLER, CAMPOSTOMA OLIGOLEPIS, IN THE FLINT RIVER, ALABAMA by DANA M. TIMMS A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Biological Sciences to The School of Graduate Studies of The University of Alabama in Huntsville HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Bruce Stallsmith for all his guidance on this project and greater dedication to raising awareness to Alabama’s river ecosystems. I am grateful to my other committee members, Dr. Gordon MacGregor and Dr. Debra Moriarity also from UAH. Thanks to everyone who braved the weather and elements on collecting trips: Tiffany Bell, Austin Riley, Chelsie Smith, and Joshua Mann. I would like to thank Megan McEown, Corinne Peacher, and Bonnie Ferguson for dedicating long hours in the lab. Special thanks to Matthew Moore who assisted in collections, lab work, and data processing. Most of all, I would like to thank my husband, Patrick, for his love and encouragement in all my endeavors. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page • List of Figures viii • List of Tables x • CHAPTER ONE: Introduction 1 o Context 1 o Campostoma oligolepis Taxonomy 3 o History of Campostoma oligolepis 4 ▪ Campostoma oligolepis in the South 6 ▪ Campostoma Hybridization 8 ▪ Campostoma Ranges and Species Differentiation 9 ▪ Life History 12 ▪ Reproduction 12 o Purpose and Hypothesis 15 • CHAPTER TWO: Methodology 17 o Laboratory Analysis 19 o Reproductive Data 21 o Ovary and Oocyte Staging 22 o Statistical Analysis 22 • CHAPTER THREE: Results 27 o Reproductive Data 29 ▪ Ovary and Oocyte Development 32 ▪ Testicular Development 39 vi • CHAPTER FOUR: Discussion 40 o Study Limitations 40 o Lateral Line Scale Count 41 o Reproductive Cues and Environmental Influences 42 o Multiple-spawners 42 o Asymmetry of Ovaries 42 o Bourgeois Males 43 o Campostoma variability 44 o Conclusion 45 • WORKS CITED 46 vii LIST OF FIGURES Page • 1.1 Campostoma oligolepis, Largescale Stoneroller, specimens from the Flint River, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Black Bears in Mexico, an Update of Literature Review
    Therya E-ISSN: 2007-3364 [email protected] Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología México Juárez-Casillas, Luis Antonio; Varas, Cora Black bears in Mexico, an update of literature review Therya, vol. 4, núm. 3, diciembre, 2013, pp. 447-465 Asociación Mexicana de Mastozoología Baja California Sur, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=402336275004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Black bears in Mexico, an update of THERYA, diciembre, 2013 literature review Vol.4(3):447-465 DOI: 10.12933/therya-13-114 Revisión bibliográfica actualizada del oso negro en México Luis Antonio Juárez-Casillas1* y Cora Varas2 Abstract Black bears are widely distributed in North America; historically their range included most of northern Mexico. By the middle of the twentieth-century their distribution was reduced to about 20% and by 1994, black bears were classified as endangered. In recent years, however, there has been an increase in the number of black bears sightings in some of their historic distribution, suggesting that black bears in Mexico may be dispersing and recovering historical habitats. In spite of the fact that the black bear is one of the important mammals that inhabits Mexican territory, there is little knowledge concerning its life history. We present information about black bear presence in the Sierra Madre Occidental and Sierra Madre Oriental. Also, we present a review of available research results on habitat, diet and population density.
    [Show full text]