Battleship Dreadnought Free

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Battleship Dreadnought Free FREE BATTLESHIP DREADNOUGHT PDF John Roberts | 256 pages | 03 Sep 2013 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9781844862061 | English | London, United Kingdom List of dreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy - Wikipedia A battleship is a large armored warship with a main battery consisting of large caliber guns. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries the battleship was the most powerful type of warship, and a fleet centered around the battleship was part of the command of the sea doctrine for several decades. By the time of World War IIhowever, the battleship was made obsolete as other ships, primarily the smaller and faster destroyersBattleship Dreadnought secretive submarinesand the more versatile aircraft carriers came to be Battleship Dreadnought more useful in naval warfare. While a few battleships Battleship Dreadnought repurposed as fire support ships and as platforms for guided Battleship Dreadnoughtfew countries maintained battleships after Battleship Dreadnought War II, with the last battleships being decommissioned at the end of the Cold War. The term battleship came into formal use in the late s to describe a type of ironclad warship[1] now referred to by historians as pre-dreadnought battleships. Subsequent battleship designs, influenced by HMS Dreadnoughtwere referred to as " dreadnoughts ", though the term eventually became obsolete as they became the only type of battleship in common use. Battleships were a symbol of naval dominance and national might, and for decades the battleship was a major factor in both diplomacy and military strategy. Three major fleet actions between steel battleships took place: the long range gunnery duel at the Battle of the Yellow Sea [10] inthe decisive Battle of Tsushima in both during the Russo-Japanese War and the inconclusive Battle of Jutland induring the First World War. Jutland was the largest naval battle and the only full-scale clash of dreadnoughts of the war, and it was the last major battle in naval history fought primarily by battleships. The Naval Treaties of the s and s limited the number of battleships, though technical innovation in battleship design continued. Both the Allied and Axis powers built battleships during World War II, though the increasing importance of the aircraft carrier meant that the battleship played a less important role than had been expected. The value of the battleship has been questioned, even during their heyday. Even in spite of their huge firepower and protection, Battleship Dreadnought were increasingly vulnerable to much smaller and relatively inexpensive weapons: initially the torpedo and the naval mineand later aircraft and the guided missile. Four battleships were retained by the United States Navy until the end of the Cold War for fire support purposes and were last used in combat during the Gulf War in The last battleships were struck from the U. Naval Vessel Register in the s. Many World War II-era battleships remain in use today as museum ships. A ship of the line was the dominant warship of its age. It was a large, unarmored wooden sailing ship which mounted a battery of up to smoothbore guns and carronades. The ship of the line developed gradually over centuries and, Battleship Dreadnought from growing in size, it changed little between Battleship Dreadnought adoption of line of battle tactics in the early 17th century and the end of the sailing battleship's heyday in the s. Fromthe alternative term 'line of battle ship' was contracted informally at first to 'battle ship' or 'battleship'. The sheer number of guns fired broadside meant a ship of the line could wreck any Battleship Dreadnought enemy, holing her hullknocking down mastswrecking her riggingand killing her crew. However, the effective range of the guns was as little as a few hundred yards, so the battle tactics of sailing ships depended in part on Battleship Dreadnought wind. The first major change to the ship of the line concept was the introduction of steam power as Battleship Dreadnought auxiliary propulsion system. Steam power was gradually introduced to the navy in the first half of the 19th century, initially for small Battleship Dreadnought and later for frigates. This was a potentially decisive advantage in a naval engagement. The introduction of steam accelerated the growth in size of battleships. France Battleship Dreadnought the United Kingdom were the only countries to develop fleets of wooden steam screw battleships although several other navies operated small numbers of screw battleships, including Russia 9the Ottoman Empire 3Sweden 2Naples 1Denmark 1 and Austria 1. The adoption of steam power was only one of a number of technological advances which revolutionized warship design in the 19th century. The ship of the line was overtaken by the ironclad : powered by steam, protected by metal armor, and armed with guns firing Battleship Dreadnought shells. Guns that fired explosive or incendiary Battleship Dreadnought were a Battleship Dreadnought threat to wooden ships, and these weapons quickly became widespread after the introduction of 8-inch shell Battleship Dreadnought as part of the standard armament of French and American line- of-battle ships in Despite losing her bowsprit and her foremast, and being set on fire, she was ready for action again the very next day. The development of high-explosive shells made the use of iron armor plate on warships necessary. In France launched Gloirethe first ocean-going ironclad warship. She had the profile of a ship Battleship Dreadnought the line, cut to one deck due to weight considerations. Although made of wood and reliant on sail for most journeys, Gloire was fitted with a propeller, and her wooden hull was protected by a layer of thick iron armor. The superior armored frigate Warrior followed Gloire by only 14 months, and both nations embarked on a program of building new ironclads and converting existing screw ships of the line to armored frigates. Navies experimented with the positioning of guns, in turrets like the USS Monitorcentral-batteries or barbettesBattleship Dreadnought with Battleship Dreadnought ram as the principal weapon. As steam technology developed, masts were gradually removed from battleship designs. By the mids steel was used as a construction material alongside iron and wood. The French Navy's Redoutablelaid down in and launched in Battleship Dreadnought, was a central battery and barbette warship Battleship Dreadnought became the first Battleship Dreadnought in the world Battleship Dreadnought use steel as the principal building material. The term "battleship" was officially adopted by Battleship Dreadnought Royal Navy in the re-classification of By the s, there was an increasing similarity between battleship Battleship Dreadnought, and the type that later became known as the 'pre-dreadnought battleship' emerged. These were heavily armored ships, mounting a mixed battery Battleship Dreadnought guns in turrets, and without sails. The intermediate and secondary batteries had two roles. Against major ships, it Battleship Dreadnought thought a 'hail of fire' from quick-firing secondary weapons could distract enemy gun crews by inflicting damage to the superstructure, and they would be more effective against smaller ships such as cruisers. Smaller guns pounders and smaller were reserved for protecting the battleship against the threat of torpedo attack from destroyers and torpedo boats. The Battleship Dreadnought of the pre-dreadnought era coincided with Britain reasserting her naval dominance. Battleship Dreadnought many years previously, Britain had taken naval supremacy for granted. Expensive naval projects were criticised by political leaders of all Battleship Dreadnought. The principle that Britain's navy should be more powerful than the two next most powerful fleets combined was established. This policy was designed to deter France and Russia from building more battleships, but Battleship Dreadnought nations nevertheless expanded their fleets with more and better pre-dreadnoughts in Battleship Dreadnought s. In the last years of the 19th century and the first years of the 20th, the escalation in the building of battleships became an arms race between Britain and Germany. The German naval laws of and authorised a fleet of 38 battleships, a vital threat to the Battleship Dreadnought of naval power. Inthe United Kingdom had 38 battleships, twice as many as Battleship Dreadnought and almost as many as the rest of the world put together. InBritain's lead was far smaller due to competition from France, Germany, and Russia, as well as the development of pre-dreadnought fleets in Italy, the United States and Japan. Pre-dreadnoughts continued the technical innovations of the ironclad. Turrets, armor plate, and steam engines were all improved over the years, and torpedo tubes were also introduced. A small number of designs, including the Battleship Dreadnought Kearsarge and Virginia classesexperimented with all or part of the Battleship Dreadnought intermediate battery superimposed over the inch primary. Results were poor: recoil factors and blast Battleship Dreadnought resulted in the 8-inch battery being completely unusable, and the inability to train the primary and intermediate armaments on different targets led to significant tactical limitations. Even though such innovative designs saved weight a key reason for their inceptionthey proved too cumbersome in practice. While the Japanese had laid down an all-big-gun battleship, Satsumain [34] and the concept of an all-big-gun ship had
Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to loe removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 WASHINGTON IRVING CHAMBERS: INNOVATION, PROFESSIONALIZATION, AND THE NEW NAVY, 1872-1919 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorof Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Stephen Kenneth Stein, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 MARCHISIO, GIULIO How to cite: MARCHISIO, GIULIO (2012) Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7323/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 Giulio Marchisio This thesis analyses the rise of private armaments firms in Great Britain and in Italy from mid-19th century to the outbreak of the First World War, with a focus on naval armaments and military shipbuilding. During this period, the armaments industry underwent a radical transformation, moving from being based on public-owned arsenals and yards to being based on private firms – the system of military procurement prevalent today.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain John Denison, D.S.O., R.N. Oct
    No. Service: Rank: Names & Service Information: Supporting Information: 27. 1st 6th Captain John Denison, D.S.O., R.N. Oct. Oct. B. 25 May 1853, Rusholine, Toronto, 7th child; 5th Son of George Taylor Denison (B. 1904 1906. Ontario, Canada. – D. 9 Mar 1939, 17 Jul 1816, Toronto, Ontario, Canada -D. 30 Mason Toronto, York, Ontario, Canada. B. May 1873, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) [Lawyer, 1 Oct 1904 North York, York County, Ontario, Colonel, General, later minister of Church) and Canada. (aged 85 years). Mary Anne Dewson (B. 24 May 1817, Enniscorthy, Ireland -D. 1900, Toronto, 1861 Census for Saint Patrick's Ontario, Canada). Married 11 Dec 1838 at St Ward, Canada West, Toronto, shows James Church. Toronto, Canada John Denison living with Denison family aged 9. Canada Issue: West>Toronto. In all they had 11 children; 8 males (sons) and 3 It is surmised that John Denison females (daughters). actually joined the Royal Navy in 18 Jul 1878 – John Denison married Florence Canada. Ledgard, B. 12 May 1857, Chapel town, 14 May 1867-18 Dec 1868 John Yorkshire, -D. 1936, Hampshire, England. Denison, aged 14 years, attached to daughter of William Ledgard (1813-1876) H.M.S. “Britannia” as a Naval Cadet. [merchant] and Catherina Brooke (1816-1886) “Britannia” was a wooden screw st at Roundhay, St John, Yorkshire, England. Three decker 1 rate ship, converted to screw whilst still on her stocks. Issue: (5 children, 3 males and 2 females). Constructed and launched from 1. John Everard Denison (B. 20 Apr 1879, Portsmouth Dockyard on 25 Jan Toronto, Ontario, Canada - D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-German Naval Arms Race, 1906-1916
    Middle States Geographer, 2012, 45: 84-89 FROM INNOVATION TO IMPASSE: THE ANGLO-GERMAN NAVAL ARMS RACE, 1906-1916 Darrell A. Norris Department of Geography S.U.N.Y. College at Geneseo Geneseo, NY 14454 ABSTRACT: Weapons systems’ common compromise of offensive power, defensive protection, and mobility was expressed as a sensational innovation in naval architecture with the completion of HMS Dreadnought in 1906, when Great Power rivalry guaranteed an ensuing arms race. The latter entailed steady improvements of power, protection, and propulsion, all requiring a larger and more costly platform to incorporate even slight advantages. The large dreadnought fleets built by Britain and Germany incorporated few improvements in tactics, command and control. Lengthening big gun ranges exceeded their limits of effectiveness, and hit rates at long range fell to 3 percent or less, yielding probable stalemate other than the destruction of obsolete vessel types and vulnerable hybrids. Advances in destructive power, protection, and speed led inexorably to the increased size and cost of capital ships, climaxed by their inconclusive clash at Jutland in 1916. As a weapon system, the battleship was necessarily modified to cope with air and undersea attack, with imperfect success. Such new vulnerabilities for the battleship echoed the denouement of French armored and mounted knights by English archers and men-at-arms at Agincourt. Perfect weapon symmetry and its related spatial deployment are apt to be transitory phenomena in the practice of modern warfare. Keywords: naval history, arms race In Ancient Greece, the Olympic wrestler already represented a long-outdated and intentionally ritualized form of combat, one with no added protection, strength, or range of movement independent of human anatomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Introductions to Heritage Assets: Ships and Boats: 1840 to 1950
    Ships and Boats: 1840-1950 Introductions to Heritage Assets Summary Historic England’s Introductions to Heritage Assets (IHAs) are accessible, authoritative, illustrated summaries of what we know about specific types of archaeological site, building, landscape or marine asset. Typically they deal with subjects which lack such a summary. This can either be where the literature is dauntingly voluminous, or alternatively where little has been written. Most often it is the latter, and many IHAs bring understanding of site or building types which are neglected or little understood. Many of these are what might be thought of as ‘new heritage’, that is they date from after the Second World War. This overview looks at ships and boats built after 1840. Principally drawing on archaeological, technological and historical sources, it describes vessels used on English inland and coastal waters and in the open sea. The evidence of wrecks and abandoned vessels is drawn on, as well as extant vessels. Also included is the early development of submarines. This guidance note has been written by Mark Dunkley and edited by Paul Stamper. It is one is of several guidance documents that can be accessed at HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/listing-selection/ihas-buildings/ First published by English Heritage September 2012. This edition published by Historic England July 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. HistoricEngland.org.uk/advice/ Front cover I K Brunel’s SS Great Britain. © David Noton, used with permission of the
    [Show full text]
  • Official Catalogue of the Royal United Service Museum, Whitehall
    m "* * V V V A Ex Ubris \ : C. K. OGDENiDEN 1 j THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES OFFICIAL CATALOGUE OF THE Royal United Service Museum, WHITEHALL, S.W. COMPILED BY Lieut.-Colonel Sir ARTHUR LEETHAM, F.S.A. (Curator). FOURTH EDITION. Printed for the Council of THE ROYAL UNITED SERVICE INSTITUTION by J. J. KELIHER & Co., LIMITED, Craven House, Kingsway, and Marshalsea Works, Southwark. 1914 PRICE ONE SHILLING. to Ufa PREFACE.131* In the Compilation of this Catalogue I have endeavoured to provide, in as concise a form as possible, a book which will be of general historical interest to the many thousands of Visitors who annually come to see the Museum. Having regard to the nature of the Museum (especially the vast field of Naval and Military History which it covers), the limited space, and the consequent necessity of having at times to' remove certain objects in order to exhibit others, it was found quite impos- sible to classify the numerous exhibits under groups or collections : but the index, which has been added, is of an exhaustive nature and will assist the Visitor in readily finding the objects of special interest. I would point out that the value of a work of this kind lies in its accuracy, and should any mistakes have crept into its pages in the course of compilation and printing, I hope they will be pointed out to me, that they may be rectified in future editions. In the first edition of this Catalogue I was greatly indebted to the assistance which I received from Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Dreadnought (1906) – a Naval Revolution Misinterpreted Or Mishandled? Angus Ross
    HMS Dreadnought (1906) – A Naval Revolution Misinterpreted or Mishandled? Angus Ross Loin du cuirassé révolutionnaire le plus souvent dépeint dans les comptes historiques, HMS Dreadnought était plutôt un « démonstrateur de technologie, » conçu pour présenter des qualités prévues pour mettre les cuirassés hors de jeu et non pour redonner souffle à la ligne de bataille. Son créateur, l'amiral Fisher, faisant face à des impératifs difficiles sur un plan fiscal, tactique et stratégique, a trouvé son salut dans une nouvelle stratégie navale révolutionnaire basée autour des technologies jumelles du sous-marin et du « croiseur cuirassé. » Cependant, grâce a une combinaison de caution, un curieux maltraitement des programmes de construction, et la résistance institutionnelle de la marine royale dans son ensemble, c'était tristement le Dreadnought qui a finalement prospéré, et non son cousin futuriste, le croiseur cuirassé. “Neither do I give the Controller my detailed views on a modern cruiser, because they would simply all have a fit! And they would make it a ‘misfit,’ but I hope to get Sir Andrew Noble to build one on speculation at Elswick, and all the world will bid for it!” Sir John Fisher, 5 January 19041 Few warships in history have attracted as much controversy as the first of the all- big gun battleships, HMS Dreadnought. Until recently, the conventional view was that its creators, fuelled by a “Mahanian” desire to simply build bigger and better battleships to contain, and if necessary, to destroy rival European navies, were fortunate that the technology all fell in place together at just the right time to make this ship possible.2 In 1 Written while Fisher was commander-in-chief at Portsmouth, although he had already been promised the job of first sea lord: Arthur J.
    [Show full text]
  • Dawn of the Battleship! Evolution of the Battleship 1889-1910!
    Dawn of the Battleship! Evolution of the Battleship 1889-1910! Robert Eldridge & Chris Carlson Historicon 2015 ! Admiralty Trilogy Seminar Introduction u “Battleship” a heavy warship with extensive armor and large caliber guns u The word “battleship” – Derived from the phrase “line of battle ship” – Came into common usage around 1887 – Adopted officially by the Royal Navy between 1889 - 1892 u Baseline naval technology in 1889 – Guns: Breech loading, short barrels, low muzzle velocity, slow firing – Armor: Compound — High carbon steel front plate backed by elastic low-carbon iron – Engines: Vertical triple expansion, Cylindrical boilers Battleship Development Timeline IJN Satsuma May 15 1905 HMS Lord Nelson May 18 1905 HMS Dreadnought HMS Royal Sovereign Oct 2 1905 Sep 30 1889 French ba4leship Danton French ba4leship Charles Martel USS Conneccut Feb 1 1906 Apr 1 1891 Mar 10 1903 USS South Carolina USS Virginia Dec 18 1906 USS Indiana May 21 1902 May 7 1891 HMS Majesc HMS King Edward VII USS Delaware Feb 5 1894 Mar 8 1902 Nov 11 1907 1889 1891 1893 1895 1897 1899 1901 1903 1905 1907 1909 1911 Dates are for official keel laying 1894 - 1904 1906 - 1911 Royal Navy Builds 29 “Standard” Ba4leships 9 “First GeneraNon” BriNsh Dreadnoughts Built 1891 - 1898 Charles Martel and her near-sisters under construcNon In The Beginning u HMS Royal Sovereign – Type: Pre-Dreadnought – Laid Down: Sep 20, 1889 – Displacement: 14, 150 tons – Main guns fore and aft in open barbettes – Strong secondary armament – Armament: 4 x 13.5 inch/30 Mark III, 10 x 6 inch QF
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Designed by Kurt Tank NEW in the Late 1930S and Widely Used During World War II
    EARLY SUMMER 2018 BRINGING HISTORY TO LIFE CHECK OUT OUR SPECIAL DEALS - SEE PAGES GOOD WHILE SUPPLIES LAST! 60-61. Check Out Our Sci-Fi P. 47 Bring Your Model To Life With Vallejo Paint NEW P. 56 Set Sail With Ships FOCKE-WULF FW190A-8, P.3 P. 42 GREAT PRICES — LIMITED QUANTITIES! P.60 EAGLEQUEST 2018 P.35 See back cover for full details. Order Today at WWW.SQUADRON.COM or call 1-877-414-0434 Dear Friends, I hope you all had a wonderful Father’s Day. Here at Squadron we are regrouping from EagleQuest 27. Another successful event under our belt and a reassurance that our hobby is still going strong. Check out Squadron.com to see the incredible models entered this year. With all the accessories and weathering sets that are on the market today, modeling has reached a new height, where it is not only about the enjoyment of putting a plastic kit together but rather the achievement of being able to finish a competitive model. This flyer is full of great new products you won’t want to miss. One highlight is the new Squadron Signal book SS10206, the F-14 Tomcat by David Doyle on the back cover. This American, two seat, variable-sweep wing Fighter was mainly developed for the US Navy. During its 35-year life span, it underwent many configurations and served as the US. Navy primary maritime interceptor. The F-14 was made extremely popular in 1986 with the release of the movie “Top Gun”. In our TD Premium update sets, we have 6 new items available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Nuclear Propulsion in the Royal Navy, 1946-1975
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2019 The Development of Nuclear Propulsion in the Royal Navy, 1946-1975 Jones, Gareth Michael http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15110 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. THE DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR PROPULSION IN THE ROYAL NAVY: 1946-1975 by GARETH MICHAEL JONES A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities and Performing Arts September 2019 Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. Acknowledgements To write a nuclear history is a difficult undertaking due to the secrecy surrounding the subject matter. It would have been more difficult without the introduction to many people involved in the nascent days of the Royal Navy’s Naval Nuclear Propulsion Programme who gave generously of their time and, on occasions, hospitality. First and foremost, I offer my sincere gratitude to Rear Admiral Steve Lloyd CBE, who listened to my initial thoughts and supported my research from the start.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Dreadnought? the PLA Navy's Type 055 Cruiser and Its Implications for the Future Maritime Security Environment
    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons CMSI China Maritime Reports China Maritime Studies Institute 2-2020 China Maritime Report No. 5: China's Dreadnought? The PLA Navy's Type 055 Cruiser and Its Implications for the Future Maritime Security Environment Daniel Caldwell Joseph Freda Lyle J. Goldstein Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-maritime-reports Recommended Citation Caldwell, Daniel; Freda, Joseph; and Goldstein, Lyle J., "China Maritime Report No. 5: China's Dreadnought? The PLA Navy's Type 055 Cruiser and Its Implications for the Future Maritime Security Environment" (2020). CMSI China Maritime Reports. 5. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-maritime-reports/5 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the China Maritime Studies Institute at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in CMSI China Maritime Reports by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. qtChina Maritime00#i$li)f Studies �p)rInstitute Summary China’s naval modernization, a process that has been underway in earnest for three decades, is now hitting its stride. The advent of the Type 055 cruiser firmly places the PLAN among the world’s very top naval services. This study, which draws upon a unique set of Chinese-language writings, offers the first comprehensive look at this new, large surface combatant. It reveals a ship that has a stealthy design, along with a potent and seemingly well-integrated sensor suite.
    [Show full text]