DOCSLIB.ORG

Supreme Court of Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supreme Court of Canada File No. 34914 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN APPELLANT (Respondent) - and - ERIN LEE MACDONALD RESPONDENT (Appellant) - and – ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO INTERVENER ______________________________________________________________________________ FACTUM OF THE APPELLANT _____________________________________________________________________________________ PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE OF GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP NOVA SCOTIA Barristers and Solicitors Maritime Centre 160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600 1505 Barrington Street, Suite 1225 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1C3 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5 Telephone: (613) 233-1781 Telephone: (902) 424-6795 Facsimile: (613) 563-9869 Facsimile: (902) 424-0653 Email: henry.brown@gowlings.com Email: delanewd@gov.ns.ca Henry S. Brown, Q.C. William D. Delaney, Q.C. Ottawa Agents for the Counsel for the Jennifer A. MacLellan Appellant Counsel for the Appellant WOLCH DEWIT SILVERBERG & WATTS BURKE ROBERTSON LLP Barristers and Solicitors Barristers and Solicitors Suite 1500 200 – 441 MacLaren Street 633 - 6th Avenue S.W. Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2H3 Calgary, Alberta T2P 2Y5 Telephone: (613) 236-9665 Telephone: (403) 265-6500 Facsimile: (613) 235-4430 Facsimile: (403) 263-1111 Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com Email: hersh@wolch.com Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Hersh Wolch, Q.C. Ottawa Agents for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Respondent Respondent ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO BURKE ROBERTSON LLP 720 Bay Street, 10th Floor 200 – 441 MacLaren Street Toronto, ON M5G 2K1 Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2H3 Telephone: (416) 326-4600 Telephone: (613) 236-9665 Facsimile: (416) 326-4656 Facsimile: (613) 235-4430 Email: john.pearson@jus.gov.on.ca Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com John C. Pearson Counsel for the Intervener Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Attorney General of Ontario Ottawa Agents for the Counsel for the Intervener Attorney General of Ontario TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I OVERVIEW AND STATEMENT OF FACTS......................................... 1 Overview ............................................................................................... 1 Statement of Facts ................................................................................. 3 PART II QUESTIONS IN ISSUE .......................................................................... 10 PART III ARGUMENT .......................................................................................... 11 Issue One .......................................................................................................11 Issue Two ......................................................................................................11 Issue Three ....................................................................................................20 Issue Four ......................................................................................................21 Issue Five ......................................................................................................30 The Constitutionality of the Mandatory Minimum Sentence Prescribed by Section 95(2)(a)(i) of the Criminal Code 31 If Section 95(2) Violates Section 12 of the Charter, Is It A Reasonable Limit Under Section1 of the Charter? 35 PART IV SUBMISSION ON COSTS .................................................................... 37 PART V NATURE OF ORDER SOUGHT ............................................................ 38 PART VI TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................. 39 PART VII STATUTES AND REGULATIONS ....................................................... 40 1 PART I OVERVIEW AND STATEMENT OF FACTS OVERVIEW 1. The concierge of the apartment building in which the Respondent was residing approached the Respondent’s apartment with a noise complaint. He was greeted with obscenities by the Respondent, who slammed the door in his face. A young police officer who also attempted to persuade the Respondent to turn his music down was similarly greeted with obscenities and a slammed door. The police officer’s supervisor made a third attempt to persuade the Respondent to turn his music down. The Respondent’s response was to load and cock a 9-millimetre Beretta firearm and open his door with the firearm hidden by his right leg. The police officer saw something black and shiny in the Respondent’s hand and asked him what it was. The Respondent did not answer. The police officer moved the door a few inches to get a better look. He saw the firearm and pushed the Respondent into his suite in order to disarm him. 2. Judge Digby of the Nova Scotia Provincial Court found the Respondent guilty of firearms offences contrary to ss.86 (careless use of a firearm), 88 (possession of a weapon for a purpose dangerous to the public peace) and 95 (possession of a loaded, restricted firearm) of the Criminal Code. The Respondent was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment, the mandatory minimum punishment attached to s.95; three years’ concurrent for s.88 and two years’ concurrent on the s.86 conviction. 3. The Respondent appealed to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, which dismissed the Respondent’s Charter argument regarding an alleged s.8 breach (Beveridge J.A. would have allowed the appeal regarding the s.8 issue and would have overturned all convictions). The Respondent has filed a Notice of Appeal as of right with respect to issues arising under ss.8 and 24(2) of the Charter. 4. The majority Judgment of the Court of Appeal also dismissed the Respondent’s appeals against the ss.86 and 88 convictions. However, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal against 2 the s.95 conviction, substituting an acquittal. An appeal against sentence was also allowed, reducing the sentence of three years for the s.88 offence to eighteen days and the sentence of two years for the s.86 offence to fourteen days and two years’ probation. 5. The majority Judgment of the Court of Appeal held that knowledge of illegality is an essential element of the offence of unauthorized possession of a loaded restricted firearm contrary to s.95(1) of the Criminal Code. The position of the Appellant is that the essential elements of s.95(1) are: (a) that the accused person possessed the firearm; (b) that the firearm was restricted and loaded; (c) that the accused did not have an authorization under which he might possess the firearm in that place. 6. The majority Judgment of the Court of Appeal also found that the Respondent’s claimed mistaken belief that his authorization to transport the firearm extended to his Halifax apartment constituted a mistake of fact as opposed to a mistake of law, therefore providing a full defence. The position of the Appellant is that the Respondent’s purported belief that his action in possessing a restricted firearm in his Halifax apartment was not unlawful was not a mistake of fact and cannot operate as a defence to the charge by reason of s.19 of the Criminal Code which states that ignorance of the law by a person who commits an offence is not an excuse for committing that offence. Furthermore, it is the position of the Appellant that even if one were to accept that the Respondent honestly believed that the Alberta Authorization to Transport which had been issued for the Beretta firearm enabled him to legally possess the firearm in his Halifax apartment and if one were to accept that that erroneous belief was a mistake of fact rather than a mistake of law, it still could not provide the Respondent with a defence to the charge he was facing, in the context of the evidence at trial. The Respondent acknowledged on cross- examination that the Alberta Authorization to Transport upon which he relied as a basis for his mistaken belief that he was authorized to possess the handgun in Halifax prohibited him from loading the firearm in his residence or in any other location unless actively engaged in target practice or a target shooting competition. The very terms of the Authorization to Transport upon which the Respondent relied prohibited him from loading the firearm in his residence. 3 7. The majority Judgment of the Court of Appeal overturned the conviction with respect to the s.95(1) offence and substituted an acquittal as opposed to ordering a new trial, although the defence of mistake of fact was not squarely before the trial Judge. The position of the Appellant is that if mistake of fact could be seen as existing in the circumstances the issue of whether it could operate in these circumstances to negate mens rea should have been left to be decided upon at a new trial. 8. The majority Judgment of the Court of Appeal reduced the sentence imposed by the trial Judge for the firearms conviction contrary to s.88 from three years’ incarceration to eighteen days and reduced the sentence for the conviction contrary to s.86 from two years’ incarceration to fourteen days and two years’ probation. The position of the Appellant is that this drastic reduction of the sentence imposed by the trial Judge represents an interventionist approach to appellate review of the fitness of sentence carried out without regard to the standard of deference required in the circumstances. STATEMENT OF FACTS 9. Stephen Sears was employed as the concierge at Bishop’s Landing on December 28, 2009. Bishop’s Landing is a complex consisting of three buildings located at 1475, 1477 and 1479 Lower Water Street in Halifax. The Respondent resided at 1479 Lower Water Street, suite 207. (MacDonald’s Record, pp.122-123) 10. Shortly after 10 p.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I'm Special I I'm Special
    !^W.'UJtf"-V^j! _j my I'm Special i I'm special. In all the world there's nobody like me. Since the beginning of time, there has never been another person like me. Nobody has my smile. Nobody has my eyes, my nose, my hair, my voice. I'm special. No one can be found who has my handwriting. Nobody anywhere has my tastes - for food or music or art. no one sees things just as I do. In all of time there's been no one who laughs like me, no one who cries like me. And what makes me laugh and cry will never provoke identical laughter and tears from anybody else, ever. No one reacts to any situation just as I would react. I'm special. I'm the only one in all of creation who has my set of abilities. Oh, there will always be somebody who is better at one of the things I'm good at, but no one in the universe can reach the quality of my com­ bination of talents, ideas, abilities and feelings. Like a room full of musical instruments, some may excel alone, but none can match the symphony of sound when all are played together. I'm a symphony. Through all of eternity no one will ever look, talk, walk, think or do like me. I'm special. I'm rare. And in rarity there is great value. Because of my great rare value, I need not attempt to imitate others. I willl accept - yes, celebrate - my differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Confessions and Statements
    Chapter Four: Confessions and Statements TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. ADMISSIONS, STATEMENTS, THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT AND OTHER CHARTER RIGHTS .... 2 A. GENERAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Protections at Trial .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Protections before Trial ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 B. INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES ................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. General .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. PEACE Interview Technique ............................................................................................................................................. 12 3. Interrogation Techniques, Mentally Disabled Suspects and False Confessions ......................................... 14 4. Discrimination
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Fonseca Case 26 Book Reviews Injustice Anywhere Ten Years 31 Is a Threat to Justice Final Remarks Everywhere
    spring 2008 • volume 9 ERIN WALSH He wins justice after 33 years, against overwhelming odds see page 3 photo: canadian press (andrew vaughn) photo: canadian 14 POLICE CAN BE SUED FOR 26 BILL MULLINS- negligence JOHNSON: Louis Sokolov Timothy the day he’ll never reports Fonseca: forget: Oct. 15, 2007 25 wrongly identified contents ◆ executive director’s report the aidwyc journal spring 2008 • volume 9 • issue 38 Development through Columns & News the strength of our people Evolution takes people 2 Erin Walsh exonerated 3 s you’ll read in the following pages, aidwyc is crucial, cases show 5 the length of time, commitment Student involvement in aidwyc 6 A and patience it takes to shepherd a Congrats to Jerome Kennedy 7 wrongful conviction case through the criminal AIDWYC agm 07: celebration! 8 justice system is enormous. Organizational Four condolences 10 change and development, albeit with much, Can you help AIDWYC? 12 much less heartache, also takes time, com- mitment and patience – especially on a shoe- Can AIDWYC help you? 13 string budget. photo: kristen watts Canadian Case Updates Organizational development provides ex- Tanya Gerber citing opportunity for new ideas to take flight Robert Baltovich 14 and tried-and-true methods to be installed. AIDWYC is committed to be- Bill Mullins-Johnson 14 coming a stronger, more efficient organization with one main goal in Romeo Phillion 15 mind: to help more people whose lives have been decimated by a wrong- Sherry Sherett 16 ful conviction. Steven Truscott 18 We’re evolving with the strength of our people, hiring new staff, ex- panding our Toronto office and establishing new protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • ERIN MACDONALD -And
    File Number: 34914 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: ERIN MACDONALD APPELLANT/RESPONDENT (Appellant) -and- HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (NOV A SCOTIA) RESPONDENT/APPELLANT (Respondent) -and- DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO INTERVENERS FACTUM OF THE INTERVENER THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (Pursuant to Rules 37 and 42 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada) Public Prosecution Service of Canada Brian Saunders Atlantic Regional Office Director of Public Prosecutions Suite 1400 Duke Tower East Memorial Building, 2nd Floor 5251 Duke Street 284 Wellington Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1P3 Ottawa, Ontario (per: James C. Martin and KIA OH8 Ann Marie Simmons) (per: Fran<;ois Lacasse) Tel.: (902) 426-2484 Tel.: (613) 957-4770 Fax: (902) 426-1351 Fax: (613) 941-7865 Email: james.martin@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca Email: flacasse@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca Counsel for the Intervener Ottawa Agent for the Intervener William D. Delaney, Q. C and Henry S. Brown, Q.C. Jennifer A. MacLellan Public Prosecution Service of Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Nova Scotia Barristers and Solicitors 1505 Barrington Street, Suite 1225 2600 - 160 Elgin Street Halifax, NS B3J 3K5 Ottawa, ON KIP 1C3 Tel. (902) 424-6795 Tel. (613) 232-1781 Fax (902) 424-0653 Fax (613) 563-9869 E-mail: delanewd@gov.ns.ca E-mail: henry.brown@gowlings.com Counsel for the Appellant Ottawa Agent for the Appellant Hersh Wolch, Q.C. Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Wolch Dewit Silverberg & Watts Burke-Robertson Barristers and Solicitors 70 Gloucester Street 633-6th Avenue S.W., Suite 1500 Ottawa, ON K2P OA2 Calgary, AB T2P 2Y5 Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the University of Windsor Faculty Of
    A History of the University of Windsor Faculty of Law prepared on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the Faculty of Law 1968‐ 2008 prepared by Annette Demers, BA, LLB, MLIS Reference Librarian and graduate of the Faculty of Law 1998 "Access to Justice is one of the great and critical endeavours of our contemporary society. It is crucial for the maintenance of the rule of law, and ultimately, for the vibrancy of our democracy, that all members of society ‐ including the least fortunate and the most vulnerable ‐ know that they have equal access to our legal institutions and to the benefits and protections afforded by our laws." Dean Bruce Elman1 2 Table of Contents THE DEANS AND ASSOCIATE DEANS 5 THE BIRTH OF A LAW SCHOOL 11 ADMISSIONS POLICY 20 TUITION 25 COURSE OF STUDY 26 THE CLINICS 34 STUDENT DEFENDER PROGRAMME/ THE STUDENT LEGAL AID SOCIETY/ COMMUNITY LEGAL AID 36 LEGAL ASSISTANCE OF WINDSOR 43 THE COMMUNITY LAW PROGRAM 53 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND THE MEDIATION CLINIC 60 OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT INTERNSHIP IN LAW PROGRAM/ INTERNSHIPS IN CONFLICT RESOLUTION 65 SPECIAL PROGRAMS OF STUDY 67 PROGRAM IN SOCIAL AWARENESS/ PROGRAM FOR STUDIES IN SOCIAL ACTION/ CENTRE FOR STUDIES IN SOCIAL JUSTICE/ ACCESS TO JUSTICE 68 J.D./LL.B. PROGRAM 69 LL.B./M.B.A. PROGRAM 70 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AT WINDSOR 72 CLERKSHIP PROGRAM TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 75 THE LONDON LAW PROGRAM 75 THE COMMON LAW/CIVIL LAW EXCHANGE PROGRAM 75 STUDENT EXCHANGE WITH UNIVERSITÉ DE QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL 76 JOHNSON - CIT SEMINAR ON STRUCTURED FINANCE/ ADVANCED BUSINESS LAW SEMINAR 76 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY PROGRAM / ACADEMIC SUCCESS PROGRAM 77 HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNET INTERNSHIPS 78 SOCIAL JUSTICE FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM 78 M.S.W./LL.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Fitness to Stand Trial, Assessments and Appeals
    CHAPTER 5: FITNESS TO STAND TRIAL, ASSESSMENTS AND APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 II. JUDICIAL INTERIM RELEASE .................................................................................................. 7 A. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................... 7 B. RELEASE BY THE OFFICER IN CHARGE .............................................................................................. 7 C. APPEARANCE BEFORE A JUSTICE .................................................................................................... 9 D. BAIL AND MENTALLY DISABLED ACCUSED ..................................................................................... 13 III. REMANDS FOR PSYCHIATRIC OBSERVATION ..................................................................... 14 A. ASSESSMENT ORDERS ................................................................................................................ 14 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 14 2. Presumption against Custody ........................................................................................... 28 B. PROTECTED STATEMENTS ........................................................................................................... 29 IV. FITNESS TO STAND TRIAL .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aidwychistory
    AIDWYC HISTORY ______________________________________________ AIDWYC is a Canadian based volunteer organization dedicated to preventing and rectifying wrongful convictions. AIDWYC has two broad objectives: first, eradicating the conditions that give rise to miscarriages of justice; and second, participating in the review and, where warranted, correction of wrongful convictions. AIDWYC is a voluntary, non-profit association dedicated to assisting factually innocent persons who have been wrongfully convicted of a serious crime. AIDWYC was founded in 1993. It is the direct successor to the Justice for Guy Paul Morin Committee, a grass-roots organization that came into existence in support of Guy Paul Morin immediately following his wrongful conviction in the summer of 1992. When Guy Paul Morin was released on bail in February 1993, pending his appeal, this Committee reconstituted itself as AIDWYC having consciously decided to broaden its mandate and to act in defence of all persons who had been wrongly convicted. Until his death in May 2010, AIDWYC’s Honourary President was the Honourable Gregory T. Evans, the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Province of Ontario and one of the three Commissioners who presided over the "Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution". For some ten years ending in September 2004 AIDWYC’s Executive Director was Rubin Hurricane Carter who himself spent 20 years in prison for crimes he did not commit. The directors of AIDWYC include lawyers, academics and other interested members of the public. AIDWYC CONFERENCES AIDWYC has sponsored or co-sponsored a number of international conferences including the 1994 conference, "Innocents Behind Bars"… the 1995 conference "Justice on Trial: The Wrongful Conviction of Guy Paul Morin", the 1996 conference "Coffin’s Legacy: Keeping the Death Penalty at Bay”, the 1998 conference in Chicago, Illinois "The National Conference on Wrongful Convictions and the Death Penalty" (of which AIDWYC was a co-sponsor).
    [Show full text]
  • Architypes Vol. 24 Issue 1, 2015
    LEGAL ARCHIVES SOCIETY OF ALBERTA Architypes To understand the evolution of law and society in Alberta is to understand our past... Annual Newsletter Volume 24, Issue 1 Summer 2015 Celebrate LASA’s 25 LASA’s New Website In Memoriam Stanley Livingstone World War I Tough Crimes Anniversary Introducing LASA’s LASA remembers Jones Excerpt from People Review of the latest A look back at the new website with Edward Pipella, Q.C. Remember Alberta Principle and Progress book from Chris Evans establishment of the several new and and the Hon. R.A.F. lawyers who fought detailing the Court of and Lorene Shyba Legal Archives Society improved features Montgomery, Q.C. during World War I Appeal and the First detailing notorious of Alberta Page 2 Page 3 Page 5 World War criminal cases. Pages 1 & 4 Pages 6-7 Page 8 Legal Archives Society of Alberta Turns 25 Celebrating 25 years preserving and promoting Alberta’s legal heritage Take a look back at the establishment of LASA 2015 marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Legal Archives Society of Though Mr. Goodfellow was in favour of the Legal Archives program Alberta working to preserve and promote Alberta’s legal heritage. The continuing, he expressed some concerns about it falling under the direction history of LASA is closely connected to that of the Law Society of Alberta. of the Joint Library Committee. Well before the establishment of LASA, many lawyers in the legal community saw a need to preserve Alberta’s legal history before it was lost. He did not believe that the governing agreement between the Law Society and the Attorney General was broad enough to include the Legal Archives According to records, in the summer of 1987 two historians were contracted program.
    [Show full text]
  • Program January 30, 2015 11:30 A.M
    Law Society of Alberta LawSocietyofAlberta r Associa dian Ba tion - Al Cana berta 2015 DISTINGUISHED SERVICE Celebrating Excellence Program January 30, 2015 11:30 a.m. - 1:30 p.m. Fairmont Hotel Macdonald Edmonton, Alberta Program Lunch 11:30 a.m. Opening Remarks 12:30 p.m. Wayne Barkauskas Vice President, Canadian Bar Association - Alberta Branch Distinguished Service Awards Presentations 12:40 p.m. Presented by: Kevin Feth, QC, President, Law Society Alberta Steven Mandziuk, QC, President, Canadian Bar Association - Alberta Branch Recipients Bruce Churchill-Smith has dedicated much of his three-decade career to providing access to justice to all Albertans, especially its most vulnerable – children. His leadership, vision and experience have helped establish and advance pro bono law within his firm and across the province. Bruce was called to the Alberta Bar on August 20, 1982 and received his Queen’s Counsel designation in 2003. Bruce is a founding member of Pro Bono Law Alberta (PBLA) and has contributed extensively to the creation, establishment and growth of PBLA. Gillian Marriott, QC, Executive Director of PBLA, writes “I believe that PBLA would not be the same organization it is today without BRUCE CHURCHILL-SMITH, QC Mr. Churchill-Smith’s ongoing dedication and support. This allows PBLA to achieve its goals of developing and enhancing organized provincial pro bono legal service delivery and promoting Pro Bono Legal Service and providing unique volunteer opportunities for hundreds of Alberta lawyers to give back to Recipients their communities.” At his firm, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (BLG), Bruce is the chair of the National Pro Bono Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mullins-Johnson Case: the Murder That Wasn’T Credits
    THE MULLINS-JOHNSON CASE: THE MURDER THAT WASN’T CREDITS BY DAVID BAYLISS ACTING EDITOR: Win Wahrer On September 21, 2005, a 35-year-old Ojibway first FOUNDING EDITOR: Harold Levy nation man stepped doubtfully from the University Ave- PAST EDITOR: Vicki Preston nue Superior Court House in Toronto, Ontario, into a for- est of microphones. William Mullins-Johnson, known as LAYOUT: Tamara Knezic Bill to his friends and family, looked up to the brilliant blue sky and cried. It had been twelve years, two months and 25 days since he had last seen the sky as a free man. In June, 1993, four-year-old Valin Johnson lived in Sault WHAT’S INSIDE Ste. Marie with her parents, Kim and Paul, and her sib- PG. 1 lings John and Jean, three and six-years- old respectively. The Mullins-Johnson Case Bill Mullins-Johnson, Paul’s brother, had been staying at PG. 1 the family home for several months, frequently babysit- Kyle Unger: Granted Bail ting the children when the parents were out. By all Photography Credit Toronto Star accounts, including those of Kim, Paul and the family PG. 5 semen, no saliva, and no biological material of any sort – doctor, all three children were healthy, active kids; and President’s Report connecting Bill to Valin’s body or to the bed where she they loved their uncle Bill. PG. 6-10 was found. Valin was found in a sleeping position, clad in Taking it to the Rock On that fateful morning, June 27, 1993, at about 7 AM, her underwear and a fully zipped up one-piece pajama Paul found Valin’s lifeless body in her bed; Bill was asleep suit.
    [Show full text]
  • COURT of APPEAL for ONTARIO APPELLANT's FACTUM VOLUME 1 PARTS I To
    C42726 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent - and- STEVEN TRUSCOTT Appellant APPELLANT'S FACTUM VOLUME 1 PARTS I to III JAMES LOCKYER PHILIP CAMPBELL Lockyer Campbell Posner Lockyer Campbell Posner 1515-180 Dundas Street West 1515-180 Dundas Street West Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8 Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8 Tel: (416) 847-2560 Tel: (416) 847-2560 Fax: (416) 847-2564 Fax: (416) 847-2564 MARLYS EDWARDH HERSH WOLCH Ruby & Edwardh Wolch, Ogle, Wilson, Hursh, & deWitt 11 Prince Arthur Ave. 1500-633 6 Ave. S.W Toronto, ON M5R1B2 Calgary, AB T2P 2Y5 Tel: (416)964-9664 Tel: (403) 265-6500 Fax: (416)964-8305 Fax:(403)263-1111 JENNY FRIEDLAND 1515-180 Dundas Street West Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8 Tel: (416) 847-2560 Counsel for the Appellant Fax: (416) 847-2564 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN RESPONDENT - and- STEVEN TRUSCOTT APPELLANT APPELLANT'S FACTUM VOLUME 1 PARTS I to III INDEX Page PARTI STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 1. STEVEN TRUSCOTT'S LIFE (1945-2001) (a) 1945-1959: His Childhood until His Arrest for Lynne's Murder 4 (b) 1959-1969: His Years of Imprisonment 4 (c) 1969-2006: The Appellant's Life since His Release 5 2. THE EVENTS LEADING UP TO THIS APPEAL 7 PART II AN OVERVIEW 11 1. A SYNOPSIS OF THE CROWN'S CASE AND DEFENCE CASE AT THE APPELLANT'S TRIAL AND ON THE REFERENCE IN 1966-1967 11 (a) The Case for the Crown at Trial, and on the 1966 Reference 13 J (i) The County Road Evidence 14 (ii) Physical and scientific evidence 17 (Hi) Evidence called by the Crown on the Reference 18 (b) The Case for the Defence at Trial and on the Reference (i) The County Road evidence 19 (ii) The response to the physical and scientific evidence 20 (Hi) Evidence called by the Defence on the Reference 21 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hersh Wolch Qc
    HERSH WOLCH Q.C. Symposium on Jury Advocacy October 26 -27, 2018 Calgary, Alberta Email: hershjury2018@gmail.com to register Hosted by the Criminal Defence Lawyers Association (Calgary), Canadian Bar Association Alberta Branch and the University of Calgary Faculty of Law Friday October 26, 2018 (1:30 PM - 3:00 PM) Symposium Opening Address at the University of Calgary, remarks by the Honourable Chief Justice Catherine A. Fraser (Court of Appeal of Alberta) and the Honourable Justice Sheilah L. Martin (Supreme Court of Canada). All conference attendees are welcome. Friday October 26, 2018 (5:00 PM - 7:00 PM) Welcome Reception at the Fairmont Palliser Hotel. Generously sponsored by the Canadian Bar Association Alberta Branch and open to all conference attendees and speakers. Friday Events free for all conference attendees. Saturday October 27, 2018 (9:00AM - 3:30 PM) Symposium, hosted by the University of Calgary Faculty of Law, featuring guest panelists from Calgary and across the country including Justice David Watt (ONCA), Justice Michelle Fuerst (ONSC), Michael Segu (Crown Prosecutor, Saskatoon, SK), Eric Gottardi (Defence Counsel, Vancouver, BC), John Rosen (Defence Counsel, Toronto, ON), Mona Duckett Q.C. and Deborah Hatch (Defence Counsel, Edmonton, AB). Seminar Topics Include: “What is a Jury of One’s Peers?”, “Ethical Considerations” and “Advocacy Pitfalls and How to Avoid a Mistrial”. Saturday Conference Cost: CBA and CDLA members $100.00 (Non-members $150.00) Lunch will be provided. Saturday October 27, 2018 (6:00PM - 10:00PM) Dinner at the Fairmont Palliser, hosted by the CDLA. Featuring a tribute to Hersh Wolch Q.C.
    [Show full text]