Free PDF Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Free PDF Download ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org Archaeolo~ Southwest volume 1+, Number 2 Center tor Desert Archaeolo~ 5 ring2000 Rethinking the Peopling ot the Americas This Issue Jonathan 13. Mabr.!J) Desert ArchaeoloS!;J) Inc. For more than sixty years, the prevailing scenario of " CLOVIS" IS THE: NAME: GIVE:N TO THE: OLDE:ST and most widespread the peopling of the Americas culture conspicuous in the archaeological record of the western hemisphere, radio­ envisioned Clovis mammoth carbon-dated between about 11,600 and 10,900 years ago. However, long-held theories about hunters walking across a the origins of this culture and its role in the peopling of the Americas are changing in the temporary land bridge con­ wake of new research, dates, and discoveries. necting Siberia and Alaska In the first meeting of its kind since 1941, experts gathered in October 1999 for the at the waning of the last Ice "Clovis and Beyond" conference in Santa Fe, advertised as a "free-wheeling, no-holds-barred Age. Now, new data from conversation" about these new developments. Sponsors of the conference included the the Southwest and Smithsonian Institution, the Center for the Study of the First Americans, and the Museum elsewhere are challenging of New Mexico Laboratory of Anthropology. this model. This issue of Among the issues discussed were new views of Clovis and pre-Clovis cultures, the con­ Archaeology Southwest reex­ troversial implications of the 8,400-year-old "Kennewick Man" skeleton (see page 8), whether amines the greatest mystery biological connections between early and contemporary Native American groups can be in American archaeology, assumed without DNA analyses, and if the scientific value of very ancient skeletons should starting with broad perspec­ outweigh the rights of tribes to rebury their claimed ancestors. tives and then focusing on With the growing acceptance of the age and implications of the 12,500-year-old Monte the evidence from South­ Verde II site in Chile, the bottom has dropped out of New World prehistory for many of the western sites. The articles attending archaeologists. The "Clovis First" and "Ice-free Corridor" models that have domi­ explore new information nated American archaeology since the 1940s are now competing with models of earlier migra­ and ideas about the peopling tions and other routes of colonization. of the Americas; the remark­ Because the ice-free corridor between Alaska and the northern Plains did not open until able tool technologies of the 13,000 years ago, an alternative model of an earlier, coastal route of migration from Asia has Clovis culture; the dramatic been revived. The model is given new plausibility by the discoveries of Monte Verde II and a climatic changes that affect- ed big-game hunters and In 1926, Byron Cummings and his students from the University ofArizona excavated a mammoth their prey; newly discovered skull at Whitewater Draw in southeastern Arizona. They believed that the grinding stones they Pleistocene rock art; and found below the skull were the first proof of an Ice Age human presence in the New World (see recent archaeological field­ pages 4 and 5). Photograph courtesy of the Arizona State Museum, negative number 71. work that may ultimately change our understanding of the first peoples of the Southwest. For expanded coverage, visit our website at < www.cdarc.org > . - Jonathan B. Mab1Y, Issue Editor ~rchaeo log'i Southwest IS a Quarteri.y' Publication ot the Center for Desert Archaeolo&J 12,000-year-old settlement on the Four proposed migration routes. Accum­ coast of Peru, and two 11 ,OOO-year-old ulating evidence points to more than one human skeletons from sites on the migration, by more than one route, from Pacific Coast of North America. more than one region of the Old World; But acceptance of these sites has early America may have been a melting come slowly. The lead excavator of pot of different peoples. Illustration by Monte Verde, Tom Dillehay of the Rob Ciaccio. University of Kentucky, has had to address numerous critiques. He sug­ argued that "multiple working gested that a "Clovis Mafia," com­ hypotheses" are the best approach. prised of influential American archae­ Throughout western North America, ologists, has ignored convincing pre­ Mike Waters of Texas A&M University Clovis evidence from South America sees no examples of pre-Clovis sites because it is not on their own turf and that meet all the necessary criteria: the artifacts are unfamiliar. "There is identifiable artifacts or human a North American prejudice; evidence remains, a definable geological context, of Paleoindians is not limited to pro­ and well-associated dating information jectile points," Dillehay asserted. (see pages 4-5). Others questioned why Ruth Gruhn of the University of such a large and diverse region would Alberta argued for the acceptance of be by-passed by earlier groups. still older sites, warning, "The Monte Verde I and Pedra Other topics included the distinctive characteristics of Furada sites in South America, both radiocarbon-dated to early American skeletons, and the genetic diversity among more than 30,000 years ago, are a time bomb waiting living Native Americans. From these data, some physical beneath any models for peopling of the Americas no earlier anthropologists argued that the Americas were colonized than 15,000 years ago." Others called for reconsideration of more than once and by different peoples, including some a sea route from the South Pacific islands to South America, "failed migrations"-biological populations that did not a possibility made famous by Thor Heyerdahl's experimen­ survive after arrival (see page 8). tal journey on the reed boat "Kon-Tiki" in 1947. The conference was not without political undertones. Interest also returned to the striking similarities­ Noticeable was frequent use of the terms "First Americans" widely discussed during the 1930s-between Clovis lithic or "Paleoamericans" instead of "Paleoindians," reflecting technology and that of the Upper Paleolithic "Solutrean archaeologists' new awareness of the uncertain and possibly culture" that flourished in western Europe 20,000 to 16,000 mixed cultural affiliations of very old human remains in the years ago. Dennis Stanford of the Smithsonian Institution New World. Keith Kintigh, president of the Society for and Bruce Bradley, an archaeological consultant from American Archaeology, said "Today, there are assumptions Colorado, see strong similarities between Clovis and of cultural affiliation before a shovel hits the ground. First Solutrean artifacts. They think that eastern North America Americans are Native Americans, but they should be classi­ was colonized by Solutrean groups using skin-covered fied as culturally unidentified." boats to skirt the margin of the Atlantic sea ice. Stanford Many archaeologists also complained about current observed that the colonization of Australia demonstrates interpretations of the 1990 Native American Graves that, by Clovis time, humans had at least 40,000 years of Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) that can result experience in maritime travel. in reburial of these remains without scientific study. The Also discussed was possible evidence of pre-Clovis opponents in this issue share a deep cynicism about the fed­ occupations at the Meadowcroft, Topper, and Cactus Hill eral government's role, thinks Jo Ann Harris, a law profes­ sites in the eastern United States, and Pendejo Cave in New sor at Pace University. "Scientists and Native Americans Mexico. James Adovasio of Mercyhurst Archaeological both think that government policy favors the other, and ... Institute, the excavator of Meadowcroft, described frag­ that politics are implemented rather than laws," said ments of basketry, matting, and cordage from pre-Clovis Harris. age contexts (including an apparent basket piece
Recommended publications
  • The History and Classification of American Indian Languages: What Are the Implications for the Peopling of the Americas?
    The History and Classification of American Indian Languages: What are the Implications for the Peopling of the Americas? IVES GODDARD Dept. of Anthropology Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 LYLE CAMPBELL ;T Dept. of Anthropology q Louisiana State University Baton i, ! JLr , Though the synthesis of linguistic and nonlinguistic data in hypothesized reconstructions of the peopling of the _ ; Americas is a complex task, it is one that can be useful to undertake, provided that the proper techniques are .! (! employed. The most important methodological prerequisite is the use of the well-established techniques of i;! historical linguistics to establish and evaluate the linguistic data. Extreme caution should be exercised in using I linguistic classifications, and conclusions derived from them, that are based on the comparison of superficially I similar words and grammatical elements, such as the method of multilateral comparison employed by J.H. I Greenberg and M. Ruhlen. The linguistic picture as presently known is compatible with a wide range of ! [ possible scenarios for the earliest peopling of the Americas. In exploring the best fit between linguistic and ! [ nonlinguistic hypotheses of New World prehistory, only explicitly historical hypotheses will prove to be of i , value. DO100811 .'i 189 ' 190 Method and Theory for Investigating the Peopling of tire Americas I Goddard and L. Cam;_bell INTRODUCTION viduals cannot acquire new genes or teeth. Languages can become extinct in populations which survive geneti- The history of the world's languages is obviously part of cally. As a consequence, attempts to correlate language the history of the human race, in the Americas as else- groupings with human phylogeny or movements at deep where.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio History Lesson 1
    http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio
    VISUALIZING PALEOINDIAN AND ARCHAIC MOBILITY IN THE OHIO REGION OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amanda N. Colucci May 2017 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Amanda N. Colucci B.A., Western State Colorado University, 2007 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mark Seeman, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Eric Shook, Ph.D., Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James Tyner, Ph.D. Dr. Richard Meindl, Ph.D. Dr. Alison Smith, Ph.D. Accepted by Dr. Scott Sheridan, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geography Dr. James Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………..……...……. III LIST OF FIGURES ….………………………………………......………………………………..…….…..………iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….……………..……………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………………………….……………………………..…………….………..………xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA AND TIMEFRAME ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Paleoindian Period ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Geology of the Tule Springs Area, Clark County, Nevada
    Quaternary geology of the Tule Springs area, Clark County, Nevada Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Haynes, C. Vance (Caleb Vance), 1928- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/03/2021 04:29:29 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565093 QUATERNARY GEOLOGY OF THE TULE SPRINGS AREA, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA by \«V Ct Vance Haynes, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 5 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Caleb Vance Haynes, Jr.______________________ entitled Quater n a r y Geology of the Tule Springs Area, Clark County, Nevada___________________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of _____ Doctor of Philosophy_________________________ Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* c *This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
    [Show full text]
  • An Amerind Etymological Dictionary
    An Amerind Etymological Dictionary c 2007 by Merritt Ruhlen ! Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Greenberg, Joseph H. Ruhlen, Merritt An Amerind Etymological Dictionary Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Amerind Languages—Etymology—Classification. I. Title. P000.G0 2007 000!.012 00-00000 ISBN 0-0000-0000-0 (alk. paper) This book is dedicated to the Amerind people, the first Americans Preface The present volume is a revison, extension, and refinement of the ev- idence for the Amerind linguistic family that was initially offered in Greenberg (1987). This revision entails (1) the correction of a num- ber of forms, and the elimination of others, on the basis of criticism by specialists in various Amerind languages; (2) the consolidation of certain Amerind subgroup etymologies (given in Greenberg 1987) into Amerind etymologies; (3) the addition of many reconstructions from different levels of Amerind, based on a comprehensive database of all known reconstructions for Amerind subfamilies; and, finally, (4) the addition of a number of new Amerind etymologies presented here for the first time. I believe the present work represents an advance over the original, but it is at the same time simply one step forward on a project that will never be finished. M. R. September 2007 Contents Introduction 1 Dictionary 11 Maps 272 Classification of Amerind Languages 274 References 283 Semantic Index 296 Introduction This volume presents the lexical and grammatical evidence that defines the Amerind linguistic family. The evidence is presented in terms of 913 etymolo- gies, arranged alphabetically according to the English gloss.
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Anthropologist Author Index
    Author Index AUTHOR INDEX Aaberg, Stephen A. (see Shelley, Phillip H. and George A. Agogino) 1983 Plant Gathering as a Settlement Determinant at the Pilgrim Stone Circle Site. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. (see Smith, Calvin, John Runyon, and George A. Agogino) 102, pp. 279-303. (see Smith, Shirley and George A. Agogino) Abbott, James T. Agogino, George A. and Al Parrish 1988 A Re-Evaluation of Boulderflow as a Relative Dating 1971 The Fowler-Parrish Site: A Folsom Campsite in Eastern Technique for Surficial Boulder Features. Vol. 33, No. Colorado. Vol. 16, No. 52, pp. 111-114. 119, pp. 113-118. Agogino, George A. and Eugene Galloway Abbott, Jane P. 1963 Osteology of the Four Bear Burials. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. (see Martin, James E., Robert A. Alex, Lynn M. Alex, Jane P. 57-60. Abbott, Rachel C. Benton, and Louise F. Miller) 1965 The Sister’s Hill Site: A Hell Gap Site in North-Central Adams, Gary Wyoming. Vol. 10, No. 29, pp. 190-195. 1983 Tipi Rings at York Factory: An Archaeological- Ethnographic Interface. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. Agogino, George A. and Sally K. Sachs 102, pp. 7-15. 1960 Criticism of the Museum Orientation of Existing Antiquity Laws. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 31-35. Adovasio, James M. (see Frison, George C., James M. Adovasio, and Ronald C. Agogino, George A. and William Sweetland Carlisle) 1985 The Stolle Mammoth: A Possible Clovis Kill-Site. Vol. 30, No. 107, pp. 73-76. Adovasio, James M., R. L. Andrews, and C. S. Fowler 1982 Some Observations on the Putative Fremont Agogino, George A., David K.
    [Show full text]
  • Page/Ladson (8Je591) : Excavation of an Early Holocene Occupation Site
    PAGE/LADSON (8JE591): EXCAVATION OF AN EARLY HOLOCENE OCCUPATION SITE IN THE AUCILLA RIVER, FLORIDA By BRINNEN S. CARTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 ' r Copyright 2003 by Brinnen S. Carter This document is dedicated to my dead father, Brinly Stewart Carter. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many people who deserve the largest measure of thanks for their patience and support. On the intellectual side, S. David Webb and James (Jim) Dunbar are first and foremost. The Florida Department of State Special Category grants, National Geographic grants, and numerous private donations of money, time, and equipment, to the Aucilla River Prehistory Project, lead by Drs. Webb and Milanich paid for the fieldwork. Grants and salary from the Aucilla River Prehistory Project and discussions with Jim Dunbar have been important in directing the work that follows. Discussions with David Anderson (modeling Paleoindian/Early Archaic American Indian bands and macrobands), Albert Goodyear (tool technology and chronology), Jerald Milanich (hypothesis generation and testing), Louis Tesar (overall Florida Paleoindian site distribution and nature) have also contributed to the quality of work. One could hardly ask for a better archaeology faculty than the University of Florida's for understanding the breadth of New World Archaeology. The archaeology faculty of Florida State University—and especially Rochelle Marrinan—helped me keep my dignity while completing the dissertation. Teaching at FSU added notches to my resume and gave me a better understanding of the pressures under which university-based researchers work.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
    OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf Author TRC Environmental Corporation Prepared under BOEM Contract M08PD00024 by TRC Environmental Corporation 4155 Shackleford Road Suite 225 Norcross, Georgia 30093 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region May 2012 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and TRC Environmental Corporation. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endoresements or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report is available only in compact disc format from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, at a charge of $15.00, by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2012-008. The report may be downloaded from the BOEM website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future. Here are the addresses. You may also inspect copies at selected Federal Depository Libraries. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology of Sandia Cave
    ^/ MA Geochronology of Sandia Cave 4? jp^^gj^^F* 'W SMlTHSQNIAN bONTRltffi^ONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY • ^UAmJ/ 0 Mp ,v * •. •'-•• SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge* was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution. Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proto-Sapiens Prohibitive/Negative Particle *Ma
    THE PROTO-SAPIENS PROHIBITIVE/NEGATIVE PARTICLE *MA PIERRE J. BANCEL, ALAIN MATTHEY DE L’ETANG ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE IN PREHISTORY (CAMBRIDGE, MA); ASSOCIATION D’ETUDES LINGUISTIQUES ET ANTHROPOLOGIQUES PREHISTORIQUES (PARIS, FRANCE); AND JOHN D. BENGTSON ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE IN PREHISTORY (CAMBRIDGE, MA); EVOLUTION OF HUMAN LANGUAGE PROJECT (SANTA FE INSTITUTE, NM) We report here on a lexical root, very widespread in diverse languages worldwide, includ- ing more than 50 ancient languages, long-isolated languages, and proto-languages. Most of these rely on uncontroversial reconstructions, while others, from Proto-Nilo-Saharan to Proto-Trans-New Guinea through Proto-Austric and Proto-Amerind, go back to far more than 10,000 years ago and cover all continents. We argue that this lexical root may only have been part of the ancestral language common to all modern humans. 1. INTRODUCTION We will document here an ancestral word root, which is found in such a huge number of language families across all continents that it can only be a common inheritance from the original lexicon of our remote Sapiens ancestors. Following the common linguistic custom of naming the ancestral language of a family by the name of this family with the prefix Proto- (Proto-Germanic, Proto- Algonquian, Proto-Bantu, etc.), we call the ancestral language of our species Proto-Sapiens. Proto-Sapiens is not a newcomer in historical linguistics: building upon the pioneering work of Trombetti (1905), about three dozen Proto-Sapiens words have recently been identified (Bengtson & Ruhlen 1994), making use of the massive linguistic materials and comparative works that have accumulated during the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • A North American Perspective on the Volg (PDF)
    Quaternary International xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint A North American perspective on the Volgu Biface Cache from Upper Paleolithic France and its relationship to the “Solutrean Hypothesis” for Clovis origins J. David Kilby Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The “Solutrean hypothesis” for the origins of the North American Clovis Culture posits that early North American Volgu colonizers were direct descendants of European populations that migrated across the North Atlantic during the Clovis European Upper Paleolithic. The evidential basis for this model rests largely on proposed technological and Solutrean behavioral similarities shared by the North American Clovis archaeological culture and the French and Iberian Cache Solutrean archaeological culture. The caching of stone tools by both cultures is one of the specific behavioral correlates put forth by proponents in support of the hypothesis. While more than two dozen Clovis caches have been identified, Volgu is the only Solutrean cache identified at this time. Volgu consists of at least 15 exquisitely manufactured bifacial stone tools interpreted as an artifact cache or ritual deposit, and the artifacts themselves have long been considered exemplary of the most refined Solutrean bifacial technology. This paper reports the results of applying methods developed for the comparative analysis of the relatively more abundant caches of Clovis materials in North America to this apparently singular Solutrean cache. In addition to providing a window into Solutrean technology and perhaps into Upper Paleolithic ritual behavior, this comparison of Clovis and Solutrean assemblages serves to test one of the tangible archaeological implications of the “Solutrean hypoth- esis” by evaluating the technological and behavioral equivalence of Solutrean and Clovis artifact caching.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material Not for Distribution
    Contents List of Figures ix List of Tables xvii 1 Stones, Bones, and Profiles: Archaeology and Geoarchaeology of C. V. Haynes Jr. and George C. Frison Marcel Kornfeld and Bruce B. Huckell 3 Part I. Peopling of North America and Paleoindians 2 Confessions of a Clovis Mafioso Stuart J. Fiedel 29 3 Why the Ice-Free Corridor Is Still Relevant to the Peopling of the New World COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Andrea Freeman NOT 51 FOR DISTRIBUTION 4 Tracking the First People of Mexico: A Review of the Archaeological Record Guadalupe Sanchez and John Carpenter 75 5 Use-Wear Analysis of Clovis Bifaces from the Gault Site, Texas Ashley M. Smallwood and Thomas A. Jennings 103 6 Younger Dryas Archaeology and Human Experience at the Paisley Caves in the Northern Great Basin Dennis L. Jenkins, Loren G. Davis, Thomas W. Stafford Jr., Thomas J. Connolly, George T. Jones, Michael Rondeau, Linda Scott Cummings, Bryan Hockett, Katelyn McDonough, Patrick W. O’Grady, Karl J. Reinhard, Mark E. Swisher, Frances White, Robert M. Yohe II, Chad Yost, and Eske Willerslev 127 Part II. Geoarchaeology 7 Soils and Stratigraphy of the Lindenmeier Site Vance T. Holliday 209 8 Mammoth Potential: Reinvestigating the Union Pacific Mammoth Site, Wyoming Mary M. Prasciunas, C. Vance Haynes Jr., Fred L. Nials, Lance McNees, William E. Scoggin, and Allen Denoyer 235 9 Late Holocene Geoarchaeology in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming Judson Byrd Finley 259 COPYRIGHTEDPart III. Bison BoneMATERIAL Bed Stud ies NOT10 Folsom FOR Biso DISTRIBUTIONn Hunting on the Southern Plains of North America Leland Bement and Brian Carter 291 11 Bison by the Numbers: Late Quaternary Geochronology and Bison Evolution on the Southern Plains Eileen Johnson and Patrick J.
    [Show full text]