DOCSLIB.ORG

P19-0008 - Crowley Parcel Map Exhibit a - Location Map

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
P19-0008 - Crowley Parcel Map Exhibit a - Location Map P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP EXHIBIT A - LOCATION MAP DIVIDEND COMMODITY LARIAT RANCHO SHINGLE LIME MINE RD MINE LIME SHINGLE BARNETT LOOP ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERSHINGLE LIME MINE 109-330-034 WEEPING WILLOW WEEPING UNNAMED PYRACANTHA CHIBRA MILTON RANCH LIL BIT LIL BARNETT RANCH CHAR MAR BIG BRANCH 00.030.06 0.12 0.18 0.24 Miles Scale ¯ P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP EXHIBIT B - VICINITY MAP SHINGLE LIME MINE LIME SHINGLE BARNETT LOOP MILTON RANCH SHINGLE LIME MINE RD Project Site UNNAMED CHIBRA PYRACANTHA LIL BIT LIL 00.02250.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 Miles Scale ¯ P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP EXHIBIT C - SITE AERIAL PHOTO SHINGLE LIME MINE LIME SHINGLE BARNETT LOOP MILTON RANCH SHINGLE LIME MINE RD ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 109-330-034 UNNAMED CHIBRA PYRACANTHA LIL BIT LIL 00.02250.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 Miles Scale ¯ P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP EXHIBIT D - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL PAGE POR. SEC. 14, T.9N.,R.9E., M.D.M. 109:33 Bk 109 tlk 1U� 1-'g 2!:l Pg 30 J ' r----- ----- --=·-=·-� 753.70' 314.93' 428.16' 352.75" lU19 AUG 30 AH 9: 55 PM 38/132/A 1 ..t400' ® PM 40170/3 RECE VEO 5.099A PM 40170/1 � PM 40170/4 Pl ANNING ;,; "' ' Dr p tdnMENT .,, @ "'.., @ 5.0A <O @ ... ,, 5.0A :,; 5.0A � • [email protected] A 216.62' PM 40(10/2+ 325. PM 38/132/C 4' @ @ 15.950A 5.01A 328.25" PM 40r71/2 585.76' f @ 5.0A / PM 39172/2 PM 40171/3 @ @ Bk 109 Pg 46 5.0BA 5.0A 713.44" PM 39/72/3 ® PM 42/34/1 @ 5.017 A 515.51' 655.21' 0:: 0 <( ' I-­ Bk 109 Pg 34 iii ..J :J t· 26.8A® Bk 109 Pg 02 Bk 109 Pg 31 Acreages Are Estimates TiilSMAP IS NOT A SURVEY. ttis prepared by the El Dorado Co. Pl9-0008 Assessofs office for assessment purposasonly. Area calculaUons Adjacent Map Pages Shownin Grey Text Map Bk. 109, Pg. 33 and marnclerisUcsa1e not guaranteed. Users shouldverify items Assessor·s BlockNumbers Shawn in Elipses Assessor's such as dimensionsand aaeage. Assessor'sParcel Nvmbers Shownin Circles County of ElDorado, CA Re�Jan.5,2010 I P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP EXHIBIT E - GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP SHINGLE LIME MINE LIME SHINGLE I MDR LDR BARNETT LOOP MILTON RANCH SHINGLE LIME MINE RD ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 109-330-034 UNNAMED LDR CHIBRA PYRACANTHA LIL BIT LIL RR 00.02250.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 Miles Scale ¯ P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP EXHIBIT F - ZONING MAP RE-5 IL SHINGLE LIME MINE LIME SHINGLE TC R2A PA-10 BARNETT LOOP MILTON RANCH SHINGLE LIME MINE RD ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 109-330-034 UNNAMED RE-5 CHIBRA PYRACANTHA LIL BIT LIL RL-10 00.02250.045 0.09 0.135 0.18 Miles Scale ¯ Tentative Parcel Map P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP Crowley Parcel Split EXHIBIT G - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APN: 109-330-034, El Dorado County, CA August 2019 Milton Ranch Road 20'± 20'± 30' SETBACK 50' AG SETBACK 15'± 15'± 165.1' 14'± 11'± 14'± 81.6' 96.1' Vicinity Map Commodity Way LIMIT OF FIELD SURVEY LIMIT OF FIELD SURVEY Road Mine Lime Business Dr. LIMIT OF AERIAL SURVEY LIMIT OF AERIAL SURVEY Shingle Barnett Loop Rd S. Shingle Rd. 110'± Ranch Road 50' AG SETBACK Milton Ranch Road Dwy. Milton SITE Weeping Willow Ct Willow Weeping Dwy. Pyracantha Dr. Byrd Foote Dr Chibra Ct 30' SETBACK PARCEL 1 Milton Ranch Rd. (GROSS) = 9.056 ACRES (NET) = 8.841 ACRES Abbreviations CONC CONCRETE OHW OVERHEAD WIRES (E) EXISTING (P) PROPOSED 41.41' EDC EL DORADO COUNTY P/L PROPERTY LINE EL ELEVATION PM PARCEL MAP 118.72' EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 21'± 30' SETBACK 48.4' FD FOUND R/W RIGHT OF WAY 50' AG SETBACK 79.2' FF FINISHED FLOOR S SEWER FH FIRE HYDRANT SUB SUBDIVISION 111.2' FL FLOWLINE UP UTILITY POLE FUTURE SHOP FND FOUND W WATER (APPROXIMATE) LIMIT OF AERIAL SURVEY MOW MOW STRIP/LANDSCAPE BORDER WV WATER VALVE 461.94' 124'± Aerial Survey Notes 66'± 83.4' - BUILDING OUTLINES INDICATE DRIP LINE, BUT MAY ALSO INCLUDE ELEVATED STAIRS EXISTING BARN TO BE REMOVED AND MISC. ATTACHMENTS. CROWLEY, JON D TR & TERESA G TR - FEATURES IN SHADOWS AND VEGETATION MAY BE OBSCURED. 111'± - FEATURES NEAR TALL OBJECTS/STRUCTURES MAY BE OBSCURED DUE TO CAMERA ANGLE. APN: 109-330-034 - SMALL SHADOW AND VEGETATION AREAS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. PARCEL 2 - MAPPING OUTSIDE OF THE SURVEY CONTROL PERIMETER MAY NOT MEET MAP ACCURACY 123'± PM 40-70 50' AG SETBACK 30' SETBACK STANDARDS. - PLANIMETRIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES IN OBSCURED AREAS MAY NOT MEET MAP 15.916 ACRES (GROSS) ACCURACY STANDARDS. 15.701 ACRES (NET) - PLOTTED CONTROL POINT ELEVATIONS ARE AT GROUND LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE 160'± INDICATED. -ACCURACY STANDARDS: ASPRS CLASS 1 & NMA Parcel Data PARCEL# GROSS AREA NET AREA EXISTING 15.917 Ac. (693,311.12 SF) 15.701 Ac. (683,941.23 SF) POND ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK PER SYCAMORE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 07/30/2019 PARCEL 1 9.056 Ac. (394,466.53 SF) 8.841 Ac. (385,096.65 SF) PARCEL 2 6.861 Ac. (298,844.58 SF) 6.861 Ac. (298,844.58 SF) 30' SETBACK Project Data 25' 50' AG SETBACK 30' SETBACK JON D. JR. & TERESA G. CROWLEY REV. FAMILY TRUST 50' AG SETBACK AG 50' JON D. JR. & TERESA G. CROWLEY, TRUSTEES 5450 MILTON RANCH ROAD 120'± LINE PARCEL PROPOSED OWNER / APPLICANT:SHINGLE SPRINGS, CA 95682 PHONE: 530-677-1651 (P) 25' NON-BUILDING SETBACK EMAIL: [email protected] 71'± PREPARED BY: 30' SETBACK 50' AG SETBACK SCALE:1" = 40' PARCEL 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL:2 FEET FIELD TOPOGRAPHY BY A.R. DIVERS LAND SURVEYING. (GROSS) = 6.861 ACRES SOURCES OF TOPOGRAPHY:AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY BY VERTICAL MAPPING RESOURCES. (NET) = 6.861 ACRES SECTION, TOWNSHIP & RANGE:POR. SEC. 14, T.9N., R.9E., M.D.M. PARCEL ADDRESS:5450 MILTON RANCH RD, SHINGLE SPRINGS, CA 95682 LIMIT OF AERIAL SURVEY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:109-330-034 N00°08'44"W 50' AG SETBACK PRESENT LAND USE DESIGNATIONLDR PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATIONLDR 30' SETBACK PRESENT ZONING:RE-5 PROPOSED ZONING:RE-5 (E) 7.5' SETBACK FROM TOTAL AREA:15.92± ACRES EACH SIDE OF CHANNEL PER H/MAPS/96 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS:1 EXISTING, 2 PROPOSED 25'± MINUMUM PARCEL AREA:6.86 ACRES WATER SUPPLY:PROPOSED PARCEL 1 - EID, PROPOSED PARCEL 2 - WELL SEWAGE DISPOSAL:PRIVATE ON-SITE SEPTIC FIRE PROTECTION:EL DORADO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DATE OF PREPARATION:AUGUST 2019 151'± PROJECT #:19-128 Approvals ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: 50' AG SETBACK APPROVAL/DENIAL DATE: 88'± 30' SETBACK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: APPROVAL/DENIAL DATE: 40 20 0 40 80 NOTE: CHIBRA COURT 660'± TO ALL EXISTING ON-SITE STRUCTURES, FENCES, SCALE: 1" = 40' ROADS, DRIVES ETC. SHALL REMAIN EXCEPT ASCrowley Parcel Split NOTED. NO GRADING, CONSTRUCTION OR OAK TREE REMOVAL IS PROPOSED. Tentative Parcel Map TM LEBECK • YOUNG Slope Exhibit for P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP ENGINEERING, INC. 3430 ROBIN LANE, BLDG. #2 Crowley Parcel Split EXHIBIT H - SLOPE MAP CAMERON PARK, CA 95682 Ph. 53o-sn-408o Fax. 530-sn-4096 APN: 109-330-034, El Dorado County, CA August 2019 ---Milton Ranch Road I- a ........,.. N w l.: a 01- :c we: OOCl: > ;;,: -w 0 Wo ("") Uo c..!) ::::l w ~ <C et:: z .,,,.,, z <::::> <:: ~ ....J c... Slope Analysis & Legend Minimum Slope Maximum Slope Area (SF) % of Site Color 0% 10% 621,218 91% >10% 20% 41,791 6% >20% 30% 7,802 1% >30% 40% 7,614 1% >40% - 4,763 1% ~ I 150 75 0 150 300 SCALE: 1" = 150' P19-0008 1 I I I I \ Slope Exhibit \ \ \ \ Crowley Parcel Split \ \ SL-1 \ \ PLOT DATE: Aug 19, 2019 - 11:31am P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL MAP EXHIBIT I - MAP LABELED WITH BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BA RNETT LOOP RD MILTON RANCH RD Biological Community / Resource Acreage Irrigated pasture (including Seep/wetland (0.40 ac) 8.12 Interior Live Oak Woodland 3.69 Mixed Oak Residential Housing/Infrastructure 3.60 Woodland Pond and Fringe Wetland 0.40 Residential Intermittent Channel 0.10 Housing/ Ephemeral Channel 0.01 Infrastructure Total 15.92 Ephemeral Channel Culvert Culvert Culvert ! Residential Seep/Wetland Housing/ (0.40 ac) Infrastructure Proposed ! Parcel 1 Culvert ! Pond and T C Fringe Wetland A Proposed Irrigated R Parcel 2 B I Pasture H C Proposed Intermittent Irrigated Parcel Channel Pasture ! Boundary ! Windmill ! Irrigated Pasture 150 75 0 150 Feet Scale: 1 inch = 150 feet ³ CrowleyTentative Parcel Map Project Biolog icStud al Area(15.92 y ac) DD ExistingFence El DoradoEl County, CA Proposed ParcelBoundary 8 June82020 !!! Pond and FringeWetland SYCAMORE !!! IntermittentChannel Environmental Consultants, Inc. EphemeralChannel Basemap:Tentative Parcel Map of !!! S eep/Wetlandac) (0.40 CrowleyParcel Split byLebeck • !!! YoungEngineering, Inc CADCrowleyFile: TM 2020-05-22.dwg Developed (Recv'd:22May 2020) AerialPhoto: 26August 2018 Fig ure4. Irrig ated Pasture GE01Vivid Maxar Imagery Biolog icResources al Map !!!! ArcGIS World Imagery Basemap layer !!!! InteriorLiveOakWood land !!!! 19059CrowleyTPM_Fig 4BioresMap.mxd 8/14/2020 Edcgov.us Mail - Project for Review & Comment - P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL SPLIT Bianca Dinkler <[email protected]> Project for Review & Comment - P19-0008 - CROWLEY PARCEL SPLIT Dave Spiegelberg <[email protected]> Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:45 PM To: Bianca Dinkler <[email protected]> Cc: Bobbie <[email protected]>, Bobbie Lebeck <[email protected]>, Eric Alliguie <[email protected]> Bianca - DOT takes no exceptions to this parcel split, and offers no further comments or conditions. Dave W. Spiegelberg, P.E.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North
    Biological Resources Evaluation Report for Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Prepared by: Sycamore Environmental Consultants, Inc. 6355 Riverside Blvd., Suite C Sacramento, CA 95831-1143 Phone: 916/ 427-0703 Fax: 916/ 427-2175 Contact: R. John Little, Ph.D. Prepared for: Thomas Martin & Associates 120 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 4 Folsom, CA 95630 Phone: 916/ 985-6380 Contact: Mr. Thomas Martin 8 September 2006 Biological Resources Evaluation Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Biological Resources Evaluation Report For Pine Acres North Amador County, CA Table of Contents I. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS..................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. Purpose of Report ......................................................................................................................1 B. Project Location.........................................................................................................................1 C. Project Applicant .......................................................................................................................1 D. Project Description ....................................................................................................................1 III. STUDY METHODS.......................................................................................................................5 A. Studies Conducted .....................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tejon Ranch Botanical Survey Report
    David Magney Environmental Consulting FLORA OF THE TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY ACQUISITION AREAS, TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY July 2010 DMEC Mission Statement: To provide quality environmental consulting services, with integrity, that protect and enhance the human and natural environment. David Magney Environmental Consulting Flora of the Tejon Ranch Conservancy Acquisition Areas, Tejon Ranch, California Prepared for: Tejon Ranch Conservancy P.O. Box 216 Frazier Park, California 93225 Contact: Michael White Phone: 661/-248-2400 ext 2 Prepared by: David Magney Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 1346 Ojai, California 93024-1346 Phone: 805/646-6045 23 July 2010 DMEC Mission Statement: To provide quality environmental consulting services, with integrity, that protect and enhance the human and natural environment. This document should be cited as: David Magney Environmental Consulting. 2010. Flora of the Tejon Ranch Conservancy Acquisition Areas, Tejon Ranch, California. 23 July2010. (PN 09-0001.) Ojai, California. Prepared for Tejon Ranch Conservancy, Frazier Park, California. Tejon Ranch Conservancy – Flora of Tejon Ranch Acquisition Areas Project No. 09-0001 DMEC July 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................. 1 SECTION 2. METHODS ........................................................................................ 3 Field Survey Methods ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey for Special-Status Vascular Plant Species
    SURVEY FOR SPECIAL-STATUS VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES For the proposed Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Project Tehama and Shasta Counties, California Prepared for: Tehama Environmental Solutions 910 Main Street, Suite D Red Bluff, California 96080 Prepared by: Dittes & Guardino Consulting P.O. Box 6 Los Molinos, California 96055 (530) 384-1774 [email protected] Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Improvement Project - Botany Report Sept. 12, 2018 Prepared by: Dittes & Guardino Consulting 1 SURVEY FOR SPECIAL-STATUS VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Project Shasta & Tehama Counties, California T30N, R1W, SE 1/4 Sec. 25, SE1/4 Sec. 24, NE ¼ Sec. 36 of the Shingletown 7.5’ USGS Topographic Quadrangle TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 4 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 III. Project Description ............................................................................................................................................... 4 IV. Location .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 V. Methods ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Other Botanical Resource Assessment
    USDA Forest Service Tahoe National Forest District Yuba River Ranger District OTHER BOTANICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT Yuba Project 08/01/2017 Prepared by: Date: Courtney Rowe, District Botanist TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 TNF Watch List Botanical Species ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Summary of Analysis Procedure .................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Project Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 Special Status Plant Communities ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Project Compliance ..................................................................................................................... 5 3 Special Management Designations ..................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Project Compliance ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Botany Biological Evaluation
    APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the California Flora
    CHAPTER 1 THE CALIFORNIA FLORA The Californian Floristic Province California is a large state with a complex topography and a great diversity of climates and habitats,resulting in a very large assemblage of plant species that vary in size and include both the world’s largest trees and some of the smallest and most unique plant species. In order to create manageable units for plant investigations, botanists have divided the continental landform into geographic units called floristic provinces. These units reflect the wide variations in natural landscapes and assist botanists in predicting where a given plant might be found. Within the borders of California, there are three floristic provinces, each extending beyond the state’s political boundaries. The California Floristic Province includes the geographi- cal area that contains assemblages of plant species that are more or less characteristic of California and that are best de- veloped in the state.This province includes southwestern Ore- gon and northern Baja California but excludes certain areas of the southeastern California desert regions, as well as the area of the state that is east of the Sierra Nevada–Cascade Range axis (map 1).The flora of the desert areas and those east of the Sierra Nevada crest are best developed outside the state, and therefore, parts of the state of California are not in the Cali- fornia Floristic Province. The Great Basin Floristic Province includes some of the area east of the Sierra Nevada and some regions in the northeastern part of the state, although some botanists consider the latter area to belong to another distinct floristic province, the Columbia Plateau Floristic Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Special-Status Plants and Invasive/Noxious Weeds Technical Report
    SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT UPPER AMERICAN RIVER PROJECT (FERC NO. 2101) SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS AND INVASIVE/NOXIOUS WEEDS TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared by: Devine Tarbell & Associates, Inc. Sacramento, California Prepared for: Sacramento Municipal Utility District Sacramento, California JULY 2004 Sacramento Municipal Utility District Upper American River Project FERC Project No. 2101 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section & Description Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Special-Status Plants Study Plan ............................................................................ 2 2.2 Invasive/Noxious Weeds Study Plan...................................................................... 3 2.3 Water Year Types................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Agency Requested Information .............................................................................. 5 3.0 METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Special-Status Plants............................................................................................... 5 3.2 Noxious Weeds ....................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH TABLE MOUNTAIN ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Land Management Plan
    NORTH TABLE MOUNTAIN ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Land Management Plan Prepared for: December 2006 State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game NORTH TABLE MOUNTAIN ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Land Management Plan Prepared for: December 2006 State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game 8950 Cal Center Drive Building 3, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95826 916.564.4500 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Oakland Orlando Petaluma Portland San Francisco Seattle Tampa 204427 ESA J MORTH TABLE MOUNTAIN ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Land Management Plan Approved by: Acting RegionalTftartager / Date _nhltn Acting Deputy Direaor for Regional Operations 'Date TABLE OF CONTENTS North Table Mountain Ecological Reserve Land Management Plan Page 1 Summary 1-1 2 Introduction 2-1 Purpose of Acquisition 2-1 Acquisition History 2-1 Purpose of This Management Plan 2-1 3 Property Description 3-1 Geographical Setting 3-1 Property Boundaries and Adjacent Lands 3-1 Geology, Soils, Climate, and Hydrology 3-1 Cultural Features 3-11 4 Vegetation Types, Habitat, and Species Descriptions 4-1 Vegetation Types and Habitats 4-1 Special-Status Species 4-5 5 Management Goals and Environmental Impacts 5-1 Definition of Terms Used in This Plan 5-1 Biological Elements: Goals, Objectives, and Environmental Impacts 5-1 Public Use Elements: Goals and Environmental Impacts 5-5 Facility Maintenance Elements: Goals and Environmental Impacts 5-6 6 Operations and Maintenance Summary 6-1 Operations and Maintenance Tasks to Implement Plan 6-1 Existing Staff and Additional Personnel
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Ceanothus Crassifolius Torrey NRCS CODE: Family: Rhamnaceae (CECR) Order: Rhamnales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida
    I. SPECIES Ceanothus crassifolius Torrey NRCS CODE: Family: Rhamnaceae (CECR) Order: Rhamnales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Lower right: Ripening fruits, two already dehisced. Lower center: Longitudinal channeling in stems of old specimen, typical of obligate seeding Ceanothus (>25 yr since last fire). Note dark hypanthium in center of white flowers. Photos by A. Montalvo. A. Subspecific taxa 1. C. crassifolius Torr. var. crassifolius 2. C. crassifolius Torr. var. planus Abrams (there is no NRCS code for this taxon) B. Synonyms 1. C. verrucosus Nuttal var. crassifolius K. Brandegee (Munz & Keck 1968; Burge et al. 2013) 2. C. crassifolius (in part, USDA PLANTS 2019) C. Common name 1. hoaryleaf ceanothus, sometimes called thickleaf ceanothus or thickleaf wild lilac (Painter 2016) 2. same as above; flat-leaf hoary ceanothus and flat-leaf snowball ceanothus are applied to other taxa (Painter 2016) D. Taxonomic relationships Ceanothus is a diverse genus with over 50 taxa that cluster in to two subgenera. C. crassifolius has long been recognized as part of the Cerastes group of Ceanothus based on morphology, life-history, and crossing studies (McMinn 1939a, Nobs 1963). In phylogenetic analyses based on RNA and chloroplast DNA, Hardig et al. (2000) found C. crassifolius clustered into the Cerastes group and in each analysis shared a clade with C. ophiochilus. In molecular and morphological analyses, Burge et al. (2011) also found C. crassifolius clustered into Cerastes. Cerastes included over 20 taxa and numerous subtaxa in both studies. Eight Cerastes taxa occur in southern California (see I. E. Related taxa in region). E. Related taxa in region In southern California, the related Cerastes taxa include: C.
    [Show full text]
  • Terr–3 Special-Status Plant Populations
    TERR–3 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT POPULATIONS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2001 and 2002, the review of existing information, agency consultation, vegetation community mapping, and focused special-status plant surveys were completed. Based on California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2001a), CDFG’s Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFG 2003), USDA-FS Regional Forester’s List of Sensitive Plant and Animal Species for Region 5 (USDA-FS 1998), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species List (USFWS 2003), and Sierra National Forest (SNF) Sensitive Plant List (Clines 2002), there were 100 special-status plant species initially identified as potentially occurring within the Study Area. Known occurrences of these species were mapped. Vegetation communities were evaluated to locate areas that could potentially support special-status plant species. Each community was determined to have the potential to support at least one special-status plant species. During the spring and summer of 2002, special-status plant surveys were conducted. For each special-status plant species or population identified, a CNDDB form was completed, and photographs were taken. The locations were mapped and incorporated into a confidential GIS database. Vascular plant species observed during surveys were recorded. No state or federally listed special-status plant species were identified during special- status plant surveys. Seven special-status plant species, totaling 60 populations, were identified during surveys. There were 22 populations of Mono Hot Springs evening-primrose (Camissonia sierrae ssp. alticola) identified. Two populations are located near Mammoth Pool, one at Bear Forebay, and the rest are in the Florence Lake area.
    [Show full text]