FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 31 • NUMBER 25
Saturday, February 5, 1966 • Washington, D.C. Pages 2409-2463
Agencies in this issue— Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Civil Aeronautics Board Coast Guard Consumer and Marketing Service Customs Bureau Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Food and Drug Administration Interior Department Internal Revenue Service Interstate Commerce Commission Justice Department Labor Department Land Management Bureau Maritime Administration United States Information Agency Post Office Department Securities and Exchange Commission Detailed list o f Contents appears inside. How To Find U.S. Statutes and U.S. Code Citations
[Revised Edition— 1965]
This pamphlet contains typical legal cluded. Examples are furnished at references which require further cit pertinent points and a list of refer ing. The official published volumes ences, with descriptions, is carried in which the citations may be found at the end. are shown alongside each refer This revised edition contains il ence—with suggestions as to the lustrations of principal finding aids logical sequence to follow in using and reflects the changes made in them. Additional finding aids, the new master table of statutes set some especially useful in citing cur out in the 1964 edition of the United rent legislation, also have been in States Code.
Price: 10 cents
Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration
[Published by the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives]
Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D .G , 20402
r r i l F R / l I t f y P L R F f l l S l T F R Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or ■ 1*1^U l k J 1 JL1I on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National Area Code 202 \ i»* Phone 963-3261 Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Fed pm t . <*"n0 „ „ Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the istoat^e^fmmft+A JU?5U26*1 1935 <49 Stat- S00» as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Admin- the* Register’ aPProved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I ) . Distribution is made only by the Superintendent or Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. advance ^ fiurnisihed by to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15.00 per year, payable in order ^dividual copies (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit check or money P, ^able to the Superintendent-of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. suant ^ ^ P eai lng hereln keyed to the CoDE OT Federal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, phr- Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code of Federal R egulations is sold by the Superintendent of and pocket supplements are listed in the first Federal Register issue of each month, mere are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal R egister or the Code of Federal regulations. Contents
AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION Proposed Rule Making INTERIOR DEPARTMENT AND CONSERVATION SERVICE Federal airways; alterations <2 See also Land Management Bu documents)______2436, 2437, reau. Rules and Regulations Notices Notices Referenda on marketing quotas; Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.; Statements of changes in financial miscellaneous amendments----- 2413 hearing------2448 Tobacco, burley; community aver interests: age yields------— -----2414 Jones, Vivan B______\----- 2445 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Llewellyn, Max R ______S------2446 AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT COMMISSION Shepperd, Samuel R ______-___ 2446 See Agricultural Stabilization and Proposed Rule Making Conservation Service; Consumer Radio broadcast services; mini INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and Marketing Service. mum power authorized for Class Rules and Regulations IV stations; extension of time Income taxes; interest on certain CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD for comments______2438 deferred payments; correction— 2427 Rules and Regulations Notices Air carriers; passenger credit Hearings, etc.: INTERSTATE COMMERCE plans ______2424 Charlottesville Broadcasting Corp. (W IN A ) and W BXM COMMISSION COAST GUARD Broadcasting Co., Inc------2449 Notices D. H. Overmyer Communica Rules and Regulations tions Co. et al______:------2451 Fourth section applications for re lief_____ —— ______4_____ 2462 Boundary lines of inland waters; Granik, Theodore, et al—______2449 Motor carrier: Gulf Coast______------2427 Harriscope, Inc., et al______2450 Iowa State University of Science Temporary authority applica Notices and Technology (WOD— 2451 tions-______■!_____ 2459 Equipment, installations, or mate Monroeville Broadcasting Co. Transfer proceedings____ l_____ 2461 rials; approvals and termina and Miners Broadcasting Railroads; freight car distribution: tions of approval (2 docu Service, Inc. (W M B A )______2451 Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad ments) ______i______2439-2442 Tidewater Broadcasting Co., Co. and Union Pacific Rail Inc., and Edwin R. Fischer— 2451 road Co i_____ 2458 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Southern Railway Co. and St. See Maritime Administration. FEDERAL MARITIME Louis-San Francisco Railway COMMISSION Co______- ____ 2459 CONSUMER AND MARKETING Western Maryland Railway Co. et al______;_____ 2459 SERVICE Rules and Regulations Filing of tariffs by terminal op Rules and Regulations erators; postponement of date JUSTICE DEPARTMENT Fruit grown in California and of compliance- ______2429 Rules and Regulations Arizona: handling limita Notices tions: Organization; Civil Division; Lemons ____ 2420 Brokerage practices of Pacific functions------— _____ ••_____ 2427 Oranges, Navel______2420 Coast Australasian Tariff Bu Proposed Rule Making reau; show cause order______2451 LABOR DEPARTMENT Milk in Memphis, Term., market FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Proposed Rule Making ing area et al.; recommended Aliens seeking to enter U.S. for decision.______2430 Notices Hearings, etc.: purpose of performing labor___ 2436 CUSTOMS BUREAU Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp______2453 LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU Proposed Rule Making Union Oil Company of Califor Glass dutiable on weight basis; nia; correction______2453 Notices method Of determining weight_ 2430 Alaska; filing of plat of survey___ 2445 FOOD AND DRUG Chief, Branch of Lands, et al.; fed er a l a v ia t io n a g e n c y ADMINISTRATION redelegation of authority______2445 Rules and Regulations Oregon; proposed withdrawal and Rules and Regulations reservation of lands______2445 Airworthiness directives: Food additives; sulfaethoxypyrida- General Electric CJ805 Series zine______2425 engines___ MARITIME ADMINISTRATION 2422 Notices Lockheed Models 188A and 188C Notices Series airplanes______2422 Food additives; filing of petitions: ontrol zones, transition areas, Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc______2449 List of free world and Polish flag and control area extensions; al E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and vessels arriving in Cuba since terations, designations, and rev Co., Inc— ______!___ 2448 Jan. 1 ,1963--______2446 ocation-______2422 Merck Sharp & Dohme Research f * J f t airworthiness approval Laboratories _____ . —— 2448 Universal Foods Corp— ______2449 POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT p ocedures; miscellaneous Rules and Regulations amendments— 2421 HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND ^nsitionarea; alteration“ ” — 2423 Eight-ounce merchandise pack w £vc?°V rea and Pederal air- WELFARE DEPARTMENT ages to certain countries; dis tionS’ ^ era^ons and designa- See Food and Drug Administra continuance ______2428 2423 tion. (Continued on next page) ¡«fL r* ■1 * ■ 2411 2412 CONTENTS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE TREASURY DEPARTMENT COMMISSION See Coast Guard; Customs Bu reau; Internal Revenue Service. Notices Hearings, etc.: Continental Vending Machine Corp______:______2453 UNITER STATES INFORMATION Home Telephone Company of Ridgway______2453 AGENCY Jamestown Telephone Corp_____ 2455 Rules and Regulations Jamestown Telephone Corp. et al______2456 Certain measures to facilitate cir Louisiana Power & Light Co----- 2456 culation abroad of American- Marathon Securities Corp. and made visual and auditory educa Bear, Stearns & Co______2456 tional materials; miscellaneous Meadville Telephone Co______2457 amendments— —______- 2426
List of CFR Parts Affected
(Codification Guide)
The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1966, and specifies how they are affected.
7 CFR 19 CFR 29 CFR 717______— 2413 P roposed R u l e s : P roposed R u l e s : 724— ____— ______2414 13— ______2430 60— ____ 2436 907— _____— ______- ____ 2420 910— — _____£______2420 33 CFR 21 CFR ___ 2427 P roposed R u l e s : 82 121___ 2425 1097______— ______2430 39 CFR 1102______— 2430 — 2428 1108-_____ 2430 22 CFR 112 114 „ - 2428 502 2426 ______168. 2428 14 CFR 21—______——______2421 26 CFR 46 CFR 2429 39 (2 documents)______2422 l — ______2427 5.33. 71 (3 documents)______2422,2423 221______2424 47 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 28 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 71 (2 documents)______2436,2437 0. 2427 13-.— ______2438 2413
Rules and Regulations
(m) Referendum community. Refer office manager shall cause to be prepared, Title 7— AGRICULTURE endum communities (1) shall conform by referendum communities, a list of all With communities established under reg known eligible voters. The name and Chapter VII— Agricultural Stabiliza ulations governing ASC county and com address of each known eligible voter shall be entered on the register for the com tion and Conservation Service (Agri munity committees published in Part 7 of this title <7 CFR Part 7) or (2) if de munity in which the producer is eligible cultural Adjustment), Department of termined by the county committee with to vote. The right of any person,to vote Agriculture approval of a representative of the State may be challenged under § 717.7(d) even committee shall be a political township, though hi& name appears on this register. SUBCHAPTER B— FARM ACREAGE ALLOTMENTS or a local voting precinct for purposes AND MARKETING QUOTAS of general elections, or a combination of § 717.4 [Am ended] [Arndt. 7] townships or precincts. The county 6. Section 717.4 is amended by delet committee may, if it determines eligible ing the first sentence and entering the PART 717— HOLDING OF REFERENDA producers will be given a convenient place following in lieu thereof: “ The county ON MARKETING QUOTAS to vote, combine communities with less committee shall designate only one than 25 farms on which there are pro polling place for balloting in each ref Subpart— Regulations Governing the ducers eligible to vote, with other com erendum community.” Holding of Referenda on Marketing munities. In counties with less than 100 Quotas farms on which there are producers § 717.6 [Am ended] eligible to vote in the referendum, the 7. Paragraph (a) of § 717.6 is amended M iscellaneous A m e n d m e n t s county committee and State committee may determine that the county be treated by deleting the second sentence and en 1. Basis and purpose, a. The amendas one referendum community. tering the following sentence in lieu ments contained herein are issued pur thereof: “Such notice shall be on a form suant to the Agricultural Adjustment § 717.2 [Am ended] prescribed by the Deputy Administrator Act of 1938, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1281 3. Paragraph (b) of § 717.2, as amend and shall state the commodity or com et seq.) to amend the regulations govern modities and marketing year, or years, ing the holding of refenda on market ed, is amended by entering a period fol ing quotas (28 F.R. 13249, 29 F.R. 16184, lowing the word “ alternate” in the sec or crops for which the referendum is to 30 F.R. 2521, 2588, 6144, 14260, 14411). ond sentence and deleting the remaining be held, the location of the polling place The amendments provide (1) that only part of the second sentence which reads: in the community, the date of the ref one polling place shall be designated in "and may be increased if more than one erendum, and the hours when the polls a referendum community (2) changes in polling place is to be provided in the will be opened and closed.” the definition of a referendum commu referendum ^community to provide at nity, (3) clarification of the eligibility of least two regular members for each poll § 717.7 [Amended] a spouse to vote, (4) that eligibility to ing place.” 8. Paragraph (d) of § 717.7 is vote in referenda shall be limited to per 4. Paragraph (b) (2) of § 717.3 is amended by deleting the period at the sons 18 years of age or older, and (5) amended by deleting the last three sen tences and inserting in lieu thereof the end of the first sentence and inserting that a list of eligible voters shall be fur the following: "or (3) the person’s name nished referendum committees prior to following: “Whether a husband or wife is entitled to vote does not depend upon and address have not been entered on the date of the referendum. the register of eligible voters, prior b. Public notice of intention to issue whether the other spouse is eligible to to its delivery to the referendum these amendments was given (30 F.R. vote. Eligibility to vote applies to each 15222) in accordance with the provisions one individually. A wife is eligible to committee.” vote if she shares in the proceeds of the of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 required crop as an owner, cash tenant, § 717.11 [Am ended] U.S.C. 1003). No data, views, or recom landlord of a share tenant, share tenant mendations were received in response to 9. Paragraph (c) of § 717.11 is the notice. (including in the case of rice, furnishing amended by deleting the last sentence water for a share of the crop), or share c. since a referenda for Cigar Filler and entering in lieu thereof the following cropper. I f a husband and wife are sentence: “I f no notice to the contrary and Binder (Types 42, 43, 44, 53, 54, and tenants or sharecroppers on a farm, 55) and Cigar-Binder (Types 51 and 52) is received by the end of such time, and jointly responsible under the rental or after the ballots and other records have tobacco are scheduled to be held on Feb- sharecropping agreement, both are eli ^tary io, 1966, it is essential that this been examined by a representative of gible to vote. This is true whether the the State committee, the voted ballots amendment be made effective as soon as rental or sharecropping agreement is Possible. Accordingly, it is hereby de- and challenged ballots shall be destroyed, written, signed by both parties, or oral, rmined and found that compliance with but the registers and community and provided both husband and wife made e 30-day effective date provision of county summary sheets on forms MQ-4, the oral agreement. A minor is not dis section 4 of the Administrative Proce- 6, and 7, and the register of absentee qualified from voting solely because of ure Act (5 U.S.C. 1003) is impracticable ballots, shall be filed for a period of five his minority if otherwise eligible and he and contrary to the public interest and years in the office of the county is not less than 18 years of age. es® amendments shall be effective upon committee.” 5. Paragraph (c) of § 717.3 is amended e date of filing this document with the to read as follows: (Secs. 312, 317, 366, 343, 344a, 2354, 358, 375, ector, Office of the Federal Register. 377, 52 Stat. 46, as amended, 55, as amended, Jr: ParagraPh (m) of § 717.1 is amend § 717.3 Voting eligibility. 56, as amended, 61, as amended, 65, as amend ed to read as follows: ed, 55 Stat. 88, as amended, 70 Stat. 206, as ***** amended, 79 Stat. 66, 1197, secs. 106, 112, 70 § 717.1 Definitions. Stat. 191, 195, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1312, (c) Register of eligible voters. Prior to1314c, 1336, 1343, 1344b, 1354, 1358, 1375, * * * the date of the referendums, the county 1377, 1824, 1836)
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2414 RULES AND REGULATIONS
Effective date. Date of filing this the provisions of section 317(a)(5) of Georgia— Continued document with the Director, Office of the the Act quoted above. Section 317 of the County Commu- County Commu- Federal Register. Act also provides that in counties where and nity and nity Signed at Washington, D.C., on Feb less than 500 acres of the kind of tobacco commu- average commu- average ruary 2,1966. for which the determination is being nity yield nity yield Chatooga : Putnam : H. D. G odfrey, made were allotted in the last year of the 5-year period the county may be consid 1 com- 1 com Administrator, Agricultural Sta munity __ 2 0 munity __ 2,743 bilization and Conservation ered as one community. Where this rule Fannin: Towns: Service. has been applied, only one community 1 Com-______1 com [F.R. Doc. 66-1302; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; for a county is shown in the determi munity _ 1, 590 munity __ 1, 745 8:47 a.m.] nation. Gilmer: Union: (d) The Act requires the holding of a 1 com- 1 com special referendum of burley tobacco munity __ 1,425 munity __ 1,576 PART 724— BU RLEY, FLUE-CURED, farmers within 45 days after the an Habersham : White : nouncement of the national marketing 1 com- 1 com FIRE-CURED, DARK AIR-CURED, munity __ 1, 686 munity _-_t 1,352 VIRGINIA SUN-CURED, CIGAR- quota on an acreage-poundage basis for Murray : Whitfield : the 1966-67 marketing year, the national 1 com-______1 com BINDER (TYPES 51 AND 52), CIGAR- acreage allotment, and the national aver munity _1, 541 munity —‘ l, 924 FILLER AND BINDER (TYPES 42, 43, age yield goal, to determine whether they 44, 53, 54, AND 55), AND MARY favor or oppose quotas on an acreage- I llinois LAND TOBACCO poundage basis for the 3 marketing years Hamilton : Union : beginning October 1, 1966, October 1, 1 commu-______1 commu Subpart— D eterm ination and An 1967 and October 1, 1968. Since burley nity _____ 2,193 n it y 1,323 nouncement of Community Average tobacco farm operators must, under sec Massac: tion 317 of the Act, be notified, insofar as 1 commu Yields for Burley Tobacco Deter nity _____2, 064 mined Under Section 317 of the practicable, of the marketing quotas for their farms at least 15 days prior to the I ndiana Agricultural Adjustment Act of special referendum and community aver 1938, as Amended Bartholomew: Franklin—Con. age yields are required in the determina 1 commu Spring C o m m u n it y A verage Y ields for B u r le y tion of farm yields and farm marketing nity _____1, 987 field ___ 2,289 T obacco quotas, it is hereby found that compli Brown: White- 1 commu water __ 1,982 § 724.35p Basis and purpose. ance with the 30-day effective date pro vision of the Administrative Procedure nity _r-_ - 1,708 Greene: (a) Section 724.35q is issued pursuant Clark: 1 com to and in accordance with the Agricul Act is impracticable and contrary to the Bethlehem _ 2, 257 munity - 1,966 tural Adjustment Act of 1938, as public interest. Therefore, the com-, C arr______1, 868 Harrison: amended, particularly by Public Law 89- munity average yields contained herein Charles Blue River- 2,110 shall become effective upon the date of town ____2,117 Boone____ 2,076 12 (79 Stat. 66), approved April 16, 1965 Jefferson Franklin -- 1,790 (7 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.), to determine and filing of this document with the Director, ville _____ 1, 290 Harrison — 1,929 announce community average yields for Office of the Federal Register. Monroe____1, 923 H e th ______2,060 burley tobacco under section 317 of such Oregon____2,185 Jackson__ 1,961 Act. § 724.35q Community average yields for Owen______2, 023 Morgan___ 2,063 (b) Notice that the Secretary was pre burley tobacco. Silver Creek. 2,104 Posey _____1,928 paring to establish such community The following table sets forth the com Union — 2,037 Scott______1,931 average yields was filed with the Direc munity average yields which are hereby U tica______1,910 Spencer__ 1,960 Washing Taylor____ 1.951 tor, Office of the Federal Register, on determined for burley tobacco. The ton ___ _ 2, 340 Washington- 1,983 October 15, 1965, and published in the community average yields are expressed W ood...... _ 2, 008 Webster — 1,854 F ederal R egister on October 16, 1965 in terms of pounds per acre. Crawford: Hendricks: (30 F.R. 13231) % The community aver Burley T obacco Co m m u n ity Average Y ields 1 com 1 commu age yields contained in § 724.35q were Determined Under Section 317 of Agricul munity _1,927 nity —— 2, 320 established after consideration of the tural Adjustment Act of 1938, as Amended Daviess: Henry: 1 com 1 commu data, views and recommendations re A labama munity __' 2 0 nity I -----3,158 ceived pursuant to such notice within County Commu- County Commu- Dearborn: Jackson: the limits permitted by the Act. and nity and nity 1 com 1 commu commu average commu- average munity _1, 938 nity ------2,140 (c) Section 317(a)(5) of the Act Decatur: provides: nity yield. nity yield Jefferson: Blount: Lauderdale: 1 com Graham — 2,180 The “community average yield” means for 1 com 1 com munity _2, 468 Hanover — 2,447 Flue-cured tobacco the average yield per acre munity J 2,024 munity _11, 661 Dubois: Lancaster — 2,136 in the community designated by the Secre Clay: Limestone: 1 com Madison — 2,154 tary as a local administrative area under the 1 com 1 com munity _1, 722 M ilto n -----1.947 provisions of section 8(b) of the Soil Con munity _11, 855 munity _ 627 Fayette: Monroe-----2,349 servation and Domestic Allotment Act, as Cullman: Madison: 1 com Republican- 2,353 amended, which is determined by averaging 1 com 1 com munity __ 2,023 S a lu d a----- 2,247 the yields per acre for the 3 highest years of munity _1, 697 munity __ 1,672 Floyd: Sh elby----- 2,189 the 5 years 1959 to 1963, inclusive, except Jackson: Marshall; 1 com that if the yield for any of the 3 highest years 1 com 1 com munity _2, 012 Fountain: Jennings : is less than 80 per centum of the average for munity __ 2, 600 munity _1,075 1 commu the 3 years then that year or years shall be 1 com Arkansas nity — 1,975 eliminated and the average of the remaining munity _1, 552 Boone: Newton: Franklin: Johnson: years shall be the community average yield. 1 commu Community average yields for other kinds of 1 com- 1 com Blooming 1,958 tobacco shall be determined in like manner, munity 1,641 munity 12, 820 G ro v e___2,173 nity — except that the 5 years I960 to 1964, in Carroll : Randolph : Brookville _ 2,153 Lawrence: 1 commu clusive, may be used instead of the period 1 com- 1 com Butler ____2,133 1,960 1959 to 1963, as determined by the Secretary. munity 1,378 munity __ 1980 Fairfield __ 2,326 nity — Highland — 2,062 Monroe: The community average yields set forth Georgia 1 commu Laurel ____2,253 2,342 in section 724.35q have been determined, Bartow: Catoosa: Metamora _ 2,387 nity — on the basis of the 5 years 1959 to 1963, 1 com-______1 com Posey _____2,165 Morgan: munity _13, 433 munity __ 1, 738 1 commu from the latest available statistics of the Ray ______- 2, 215 — 2,848 Federal Government in accordance with See footnotes at end of table. Salt Creek- 2,404 nity
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 I
RULES AND REGULATIONS 2415
I ndiana-—Continued K entucky— Continued K entucky- -Continued County Commu County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity commu average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield Ohio: Spencer: Breathitt— Con. Clay— Continued -- Gallatin: Harrison— Con. 1 com Carter_____ 1, 888 C ______1,621 D ______1,914 A ______1,984 J ______1, 793 munity __ 2,147 Clay______* 2, 044 D _____ 1,949 E ______2,162 B ______2,197 K______1,763 Orange: Grass______1,944 E ______1,671 P ______1,861 C ______1,880 L ______1,913 1 com Hammond _ 1, 740 P ______1,754 G ______2,009 Garrard: Hart: munity __ 2,333 H arrison _1,819 G ______1, 750 Clinton : A ______2,139 A __„______2,352 Owen: Huff _I_____ 2,138 Breckinridge: A ______2,043 B ______2,187 B ______2, 428 1 com Jackson 2,055 A ______2,098 B • :______2,077 C ______2,168 C _____ .__ 2,318 munity _2,095 L u c e ______1,931 B' ______1,812 C ______2,078 D ______2,263 D ______2,232 Ohio ______1,862 Parke: C ______1,886 D ______1,986 E _____ 2, 323 E ____2,275 Sullivan: loom- ~ : D ______1,984 E ______2,035 Grant: Henderson: munity_12, 811 1 com E ______2,055 Crittenden : A ______1,896 munity __ 2,015 A 1,568 Perry: F ______2,091 1 com- B ______1, 859 B ______1,635 1 com Switzerland: G ______1,966 munity __ 1,502 C _____ 2,265 C ____1, 598 munity _1,494 C otton____2,163 Bullitt: Cumberland D _____ 2,461 D ____ 1,550 Putnam: ' Craig______2, 004 A ______1,998 A ______1,963 E ______2,234 1 com Jefferson__2, 020 E _____-_• 1,664 B ______1,952 B ______1,995 P ______2,285 P— ______1,528 munity __ 2,839 Pleasant 2, 298 C ______2,040 C ______2,089 G ______1,928 Ripley: P o se y _____1, 827 G ______1,742 D ______1,900 D ______-__ 1,974 H ______2,414 Henry: 1 com York ______1,961 E ______1,737 E ______1,933 I ______2,210 munity _2,187 Union: A ______2, 465 Butler: P ______1,871 Graves: B ______2,467 Rush: 1 com 1 com G ______1,943 1 com A ______1,451 C ____ _ 2,243 munity __ 2,031: munity __1, 774 H ______1,918 munity _2, 028 Warrick: B ______1,555 D ______2,414 Caldwell: I ______1,884 C _____ 1,557 E _____ ,___ 2,399 Scott: 1 com A ______1,511 1 com munity _1,807 Daviess : D ______1,619 P ...... 2,481 B ______1,778 A ______1,940 E ______1,667 G _____ 2,061 munity _2,147 Washington: C ______1,655 Shelby: 1 com B ______•_ 1,787 F ______1,590 H ___ _ 2, 430 D ______1,525 C ______1,736 G ______1,691 I _____ 2,546 1 com munity _2,155 E ______1,569 munity _2, 222 D ______1,721 H ______1,639 Hickman : P ______1,750 E ______1,793 J ______1,583 1 commu K ansas G ______1,435 P ______2,117 Grayson: nity _____1, 605 Calloway: Atchison: Leavenworth: G ______1,919 A __.______2,118 Hopkins: 1 commu H ______1,766 B ______2,118 1 commu 1 com 1 com nity _____1, 531 J ______1,793 C ...... 1,994 nity _____ 1,514 munity __ 1, 744 munity __1, 408 Campbell: Doniphan: Linn: K ______1,961 D ______2,076 Jackson: 1 commu L _____ 1,906 E ______2,369 1 com 1 com nity _.__ 1, 858 A ______2, 046 Edmonson: P ______2,167 munity __ 1, 544 munity _ 1,311 Carlisle: B ______2, 097 A __- ___ Green: 1 commu __ 1,977 C ______2,136 B ______A _____ 2,217 nity _____ 1, 704 - 2,005 D 1______2, 131 C ______1,983 B ______2,155 Adair: Bath—Continued Carroll: E ______2,052 D ______C ____;_____2,066 A - , D ______2,095 A ______2,113 ._ 2,050 Jefferson: B ...... E ______12, 291 E ______2,345 D ______2,123 1 commu B ______2,062 E ______2,200 C ______Bell: C ------2,118 Elliott: nity ____1, 945 D _ 1 com A ______— 2,138 P ___ :___ 1,998 Jessamine: D ______2,117 G ______2,187 E ...... munity __2, 041 E ______2,154 B ______2,065 A ______1, 988 P —_ Boone: P ______2,322 C ______2,255 Greenup: B ______2,193 G _ A ------2,113 A ------1,989 G ______2,174 D ______2,204 C _____ :___ 2,104 Allen: B ...... 1,988 Carter: E ______2,238 B ...... 2,047 D ______2,077 A _ C ------____ 1,935 A ______2,014 Estill: C ______2,231 Johnson: D ----- _____ 2,123 B ___ D ------1,801 B ______2,074 A ______— 1,757 1 commu C ___ „ E ------2,147 C ______2,044 B ______1,749 E ___------2,131 nity _____ 1,966 D ...... P ______2,163 Bourbon: D ______2,113 C ______2,088 Kenton: E ___ G ...... 2,152 A ------2,281 E ______2,021 D ______— 1,894 A- ...... ____ 2,030 P __ H ------2,084 B ------2,274 Casey: E ______1,845 B ______2,010 G ___ I ------2, 067 C ------2,192 A ______2,090 Payette : C ...... 1,876 Anderson : D ______2,358 B______-2,175 A ______— 2,364 Hancock: D ...... 2, 229 A ___ CZ ------2,114 B _ ____ — 2,349 A ______1,885 B __ E ------2,434 E ______1,899 P ------___ 2,388 D ______2,037 C ______-_ 2,283 B ------1,826 C __ Knott: G ------2,409 E ______1,974 D ______2, 196 C ______1,664 1 com D __ P ______2,056 E ______— 2,327 Hardin: E __ Boyd : munity _2, 270 1 commu G ______2,165 Fleming: A ------2,061 Knox: P __ Christian: A —1 2, 137 B ------2,375 G ___ nity _____2,109 A ___^_____ 2,113 Boyle: A ...... 1,674 B ______2,078 C ...... 2,131 B ______2, 053 Ballard : B ------1,729 C ______._ 2, 191 D ______2,024 A __ A ______1,996 C _____;____1,880 B ------2,026 C ...... 1,994 D ______._ 2, 144 E ______1,888 D ...... 1,999 B _ D ___...... 1,717 E ______._* 2, 472 P ------1,879 C _ C ------2,035 E ______2,001 E ------1,757 P ______— 2,092 G ...... 2,051 D _ D ------2,212 Larue: P ...... 2,061 G ______._ 2,000 H ------1,968 E __ E ------2,013 A ______2,083 G ______1,965 Floyd: J ------1,999 Barren : P ------2,136 B ______1,836 G ------2, 004 H ______2,015 1 commu- K ------1,895 C ______2,088 A __ L ------1,864 Bracken: J ...... 1,954 n ity -----..1,998 D ...... 2,257 B _ Harlan: A ------2,330 Clark: Franklin: E __;______._ 2, 145 B ------2,113 A ...... 2,118 A ______._ 1,798 1 commu Laurel: nity ______1,989 E __ C ------1,933 B ------2,323 B ______._ 1,943 A Li;______2,189 D ------1,745 C ------1,872 C ______._ 2,009 Harrison: B _____ 2, 213 D G E ______2, 139 D ______2,030 ._ 2,185 A ___------2,450 C ______2,315 E ______1,862 E Bath: P ------2,149 ._ 1,986 B ______2,276 D ______;___ 2,076 < fp < P ______2,098 P ______._ 2,295
1 I C ------2,335 I 1
1 1 E ------2,214
f 1 G ------2,061 1 1 1 1 1 1 G ------2,188 G ______1 2, 087 D ------2,168 P ______2,187 c Breathitt:
A ------1,702 Clay: H ___...... _ 1,828 E ______2,022 G ------2,327 B ------1,087 A ...... 1, 990 Fulton : P ...... - 1,891 Lawrence : B ------2,110 ^ footnotes at 1 com- G ______2,252 1 com of table. C ______1, 976 munity .._ 2, 445 H 2,046 munity _2, 139
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2416 RULES AND REGULATIONS
K entucky— Continued. K entucky— Continued K entucky— Continued County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield Lee: Marion— Continued Muhlenberg— Con. Robertson : Trimble: Wayne— Continued 1 com- E ______2,236 D ------1,650 A ______. _ 1,888 A ______.__ 2,452 E ______munity — 1,887 P __ 2,112 E ___ ------1,765 B ______1,764 B .._ 2,536 P _ — 2,161 Leslie: G ______2,227 Nelson: C ______— 1,753 C ______.__ 2,494 G — 2,151 1 com- H ______2,194 A ____ ------1,889 Rockcastle : Union: H ______— 2,140 munity — 1,737 J ______— 2,282 B ------2,068 A - .... 2, 188 1 commu- J ______— 2,114 Letcher: K ______2,212 C ______1,929 B __ 2,358 nity 1,559 K ______1 com- L ______— 2,249 E> ------2, 124 C ______2,182 Warren: L — 2,026 munity __ 1,724 Marshall: E ____ ------2,129 D ______2,016 A ______.— 1,989 Webster: Lewis: 1 com- P ------1,970 E ...... 2,032 B _____ .__ 1,893 1 com- A ______* 2,278 munity __ 1,444 G ____ ------2,244 Rowan: C ______.__ 1,900 munity — 1,729 B ______.__ 2,044 Martin : H ____ ------2,176 A . . _ 2,121 D ______2,114 Whitley: C ______.__ 2,067 1 commu- J _____ ------2,055 B ______2,122 E ______— 2,061 1 com- D ______.__ 2,109 nity ___ — 2,224 Nicholas: C ______.__ 2,098 P 2,084 munity — 1,958 E __ 2,093 Mason: A _ _------2,020 D ______2,033 G ______.__ 2,021 Wolfe: P ______2, 338 A ______12, 300 B ____ ------1,965 E ______2,070 H ______— 1,998 A ______... 1,878 2,191 B ______G ______2,007 C ____ ------2,107 Russell: J ______— 1,859 B — 1,893 Lincoln: C — 2,066 D _____1,997 A ______— 1,958 Washington O — 1,971 A ______— 2,176 D ______2,274 E ___ 12, 402 B .__ 1,971 A __ _ 2,034 D 2,002 B ______E ...... __ 2,027 __ 2,205 Ohio: C ______2, 007 B — 1,948 E ______— 2,128 C ______2,054 P ______-J12,223 A ____ ------1,723 D 2,011 C — 2,044 Woodford: D __:_____,__ 2,102 G '______1,957 B ____ ------1,623 E ____*___.__ 2,087 D .__ 2,136 A ______— 2,549 E ______,__ 2,027 H ______2,061 C ______1,782 P ______1,994 E ______.__ 2,185 B __ 2,238 P ______,__ 2,134 J ______2,102 D _ ------1,785 G ______2,080 Wayne: C ______— 2,412 G ______2,132 Meade : E ... ------1,782 Scott: A ______— 2,029 D -_ 2,341 Livingston: A ______._ 2,001 P ____ . — 1,700 A _ .__ 2,329 B ______2,128 E __ 2,329 1 com B ._ 1,859 G _ ------1,839 B .__ 2,236 C ______— 2,242 F ______2,135 munity __11 , 650 C ______— 1,926 Oldham : C ______2,080 D ______-_ 2,130 Logan: D ._ 1,856 A _____2,282 D — 1,898 A ...... 1,866 E ______1,902 B ___ .------2,161 E ______1,896 Missouri B ______2,005 Menifee: C _ ------2,098 P .__ 2,076 C ______2,023 A ______._ 1,914 D ______2,199 G ______,__ 2,110 Andrew: De Kalb : D ______1,846 B ______._ 1,983 E ______2,179 Shelby: 1 com- 1 commu- E ______2,104 C ______._ 2,125 Owen: A _____ — 2,265 munity __ 1, 623 nity _____ 1,641 P ______1,783 D ______2,146 A ____ :____2,392 B __ 1,976 Atchison: Howard: G ______1,853 E ______._ 2, 157 B .... - 2,404 C ______— 2,369 1 com- 1 commu- H ______1,862 Mercer: C ______2,162 D __ 2,193 munity — 1,857 nity _____ 1,856 J ______1,918 A ._ 1,802 D ______1,963 E — 2,094 Bates: Howell : Lyon: B — ___ ._ 1,891 E ____ . ___ 2,077 Simpson: 1 com- 1 commu- 1 commu C ...... 2,067 Owsley: A ______— 2, 149 munity__11,805 nity'_____1,800 D ______nity ------1, 566 ._ 2,185 A ------1,897 B 2,215 Bollinger: ? Knox: McCracken: E ______2, 220 B _____ ;___ 2,030 C __ 2,055 1 com 1 commu A ______1,638 Metcalfe : C ______2,066 Spencer: munity __11,998 nity _____1,730 B ______1,812 A _ 2,063 A ______D ______1,920 ___ 1,916 Boone: Lafayette: 0 ___ 1,776 B ______- 2,023 E ------1,925 B ______—_ 2,136 1 com D ______1,894 C ______._ 2,144 1 commu Pendleton: C —_ 2,156 munity __ 1, 757 nity ______1,459 E _...... _ 1,966 D _ 2,250 A ______2,079 D ______2,017 Bucbanan: McCreary: E 2, 049 E ______1 com- Lincoln: B ------1,896 ___ 2,031 1 commu 1 commu Monroe : P ______2,120 • m unity__1, 786 C ------2, 037 nity ______1,750 nity ______1,874 A ______- 1,899 D ----- ;------1,901 G ______— 2,055 Caldwell: McLean: B ______1,979 E ______1, 944 Taylor: 1 com Moniteau: A ------1,839 C ______- 2,177 P ______2, 022 A ______2,230 munity __11, 480 1 commu B ______1,899 D _ 2,085 G ------1,939 B ______.__ 2,227 Callaway: nity _____1,723 C ______1,932 E ______1,998 Perry: C ______2,294 1 com Platte: D ______1,587 P ______._ 2,175 1 commu D -__ 2, 183 munity __1, 757 Carroll».— 1,812 E ------1,985 G ______._ 2,203 nity _____ 1,660 E ______2, 170 Carroll: P a ir______1,955 P ______1,791 H ______- 2,177 Pike: P ______2,064 1 com G reen_____1,923 J ______G ------1,865 ._ 2,086 1 commu G ______.__ 2,164 munity __2,022 Lee _____ - 1,962 Madison: Montgomery nity ______1,763 Todd: Chariton: A _____ Marshall__ 2,039 A ------„__ 2,095 ._ 2,242 Powell: A ______1,762 1 com B ______1,989 B _ ____ ._ 2, 108 Pettis___— 1,670 A ------1,753 B ______2, 174 munity __1, 865 C ______2,097 C ______._ 2,010 Christian: Preston__ 1,570 B ______.___ 12,033 C ______-__ 1,873 D ______2, 281 D ______._ 2,267 D ______1 com Waldron__ 1,918 C ------1,849 ___ 1,706 E ______2, 159 E ______._ 2,133 E ______1,847 munity __ 974 Weston____1,948 P ______2,347 Morgan: D ------11, 962 P ______2,014 Clay: Randolph: G _____ „___ 2,074 A ______E ------11, 819 ._ 1,887 G ______2,057 1 commu 1 commu Magoffin: B - 2,035* Pulaski: H ______2,090 nity _____ 1,621 nity ____- 1.685 A ______1,846 C ______._ 1,883 A ------2,113 J ______—_ 1,746 Clinton: Ray: B ______1,940 D ._ 2,014 B ------2,086 C ______1,839 K ______-__ 1,694 1 commu 1 commu E ______._ 2,225 C ______2,099 L ______2, 231 nity _____ 1, 65T nity - _— 1> 592 D ------1,896 P ______E ------1,959 ._ 1,915 D ------2,4)80 Trigg: Cole: Ripley: Marion: G ______._ 2,118 E ------2,144 A ______1,703 1 commu 1 commu A ______2,071 Muhlenberg: P ______2,275 B ______— 1,778 nity _____ 1,508 nity - _____1,035 B ------2,362 A ______._ 1,387 G ______2,220 C ______1,917 Cooper: St. Clair: B C ______2,143 _ 1,845 H ------2,448 D — 1,565 1 commu 1 commu D ______2,101 C - ...... - 1,748 J ------2,194 E — 1,938 nity _____ 1,872 nity ------2,027 See footnotes at end of table.
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2417
Missouri—Continued North Carolina—Continued Ohio— Continued County Commu- County Commu County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- ante nity and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield St. Francois: Stone: McDowell: Watauga: Brown : Highland: 1 commu-______1 commu 1 com- A Beaver Byrd _____ 12,357 Brush- nity ____12, 209 n ity ____11, 364 m unity_ 1, 870 D am ____ 2,322 Clark ______1,962 creek— . _1,978 Saline: Taney: Macon: B Brushy Eagle — 2,107 C lay______1, 818 1 commu-______1 commu 1 com- Fork____ 2, 360 F ran k lin __1,987 Concord__ 1, 973 nity _____2,141 nity--12,305 m unity_ 2, 008 C Cove Green 1__ __ 1, 728 Dodson __ * 2, 324 Shelby: Texas: Madison: C re e k __ 2,454 Huntington. 1, 908 Fairfield___1,963 1 commu-______1 commu A—1 ______2,181 D Laurel Jackson___ 2,062 Hamer _____ 1,914 nity _____f; 901 n it y _____1, 479 B -2 ______2,386 Creek ___ 2,396 Jefferson _12,377 Jackson___2, 038 North Carolina C -3 ______2, 354 E Meat Lewis ... 2,116 Liberty____2, 013 D—4 ______2,245 C a m p ... 2,398 Perry ______1, 870 M adison__ 1, 869 Alleghany: Buncombe— Con. E -5 ______2, 238 F New P ik e______1,778 Marshall — 2,031 1 commu- N Sandy F - 6 ______2,229 River . . . 2,345 Pleasant__2, 299 New nity—.__ 2, 247 M u s h ___ 2,353 G—7 ______2, 074 G North Scott _____1,915 Market___1, 983 Ashe: P Swan- H -8 ______2,123 Fork____ 2, 430 Sterling . . . 1,787 Paint _____ 2, 014 A Chestnut n an oa___ 2,100 J-9 ______2,239 H Shawnee- U n io n _____ 2,113 P e n n ______2, 012 H ill____ 2,146 R Weaver- K—10 ______2, 199 h a w ____ 2, 449 Washing Salem _____ 1, 779 B Clifton— 2,304 v i l l e ____ 2, 069 L - l l ______2, 227 J Stony ton ______1, 993 U n io n ___ ._ 1,845 C Creston _ 2,335 S West Bun- M—12 _____ 2,164 Fork_____ 2, 442 Butler : Washing D E lk _____ 2,452 combe — 2,072 N—13______2,054 K Watauga. 2, 368 1 commu- . ton______2, 028 E Grassy Burke: 0 -1 4 ______2,389 Wilkes: n i t y ____2, 044 White- Creek _ 2, 306 1 commu- P—15_____ 2, 229 1 com- Clermont: oak______2, 056 F Helton — 2, 278 n ity _____ 1, 644 Q -16______2,187 m unity__ 2, 180 B a ta v ia ___1, 861 Jackson: G Horse Caldwell : Mitchell: Yancey: F ra n k lin __2, 020 1 com Creek _ 2,318 1 corrunu- A Bakers- A East munity __ 2, 023 H Hurricane- 2,153 n ity _____ 1, 909 Jackson___1,782 v ille ____ 2,290 Burnsville. 2, 526 Miami _____ 1,737 Lawrence: J Jefferson . 2,217 Catawba: B Brad- B West M o n ro e___1, 893 1 com K Laurel_ 2, 247 1 commu- shaw----- 2,331 Burnsville. 2,475 O h io ______1,986 munity_1,833 L North n i t y ___ 11,138 C Cane C Cane Licking: Fork __ 2,276 Cherokee: Creek___ 2, 260 R iv e r____2,413 Pierce_____ 1, 749 Stonelick . 1 , 646 1 com M O b id s_ 2,405 1 commu- D Fork D Upper Tate______1, 942 munity _ 2 0 N Old n ity _____ 2,077 Mountain. 2, 446 Egypt___ 2, 446 Meigs: Fields _ 2,495 Clay : U n io n _____ 1, 756 E Grassy E Lower 1 commu 0 Peak- . 1 commu- Creek___ 2,244 Egypt ___2, 420 Wash ington _1,940 nity _____1, 803 Creek _ 2,251 n ity _____ 1,908 F Herrell A . 2, 350 F Ramsey- Montgomery: P Piney Cleveland: G Herrell B_ 2,481 t o w n ____2, 229 W a y n e ____1, 949 1 commu Creek _ 2,198 l commu- H Little G Green Williams nity _____ 1, 500 Rock----- 2, 610 Mountain. 2,338 burg _____ 2,083 Q Pine n ity _____ 1, 276 Monroe: Swamp- 2,422 Davidson: J Poplar__ 2, 270 H Brush Clinton : R Pond 1 commu- K Red Hill. 2, 327 Creek____2, 304 1 commu 1 commu Moun- nity _____ l, 822 L Snow J Upper nity _____ 1,915 nity _____1, 782 tain ___ 2,501 Gaston: Creek . . . 2,474 Jacks Delaware : Morgan: S Walnut 1 commu- Polk: Creek___ 2,417 1 commu 1 commu Hill — 2,197 n ity _____ 2 0 1 com- K Lower nity — 20 nity _____ 2,363 T West Graham: m unity_ 2, 080 Jacks Fayette: Noble: T West Jeff- l commu- Rutherford: Creek___ 2,317 1 commu 1 commu son----- 2, 270 n ity __2,115 1 com- L East nity — 1,751 nity ...... 1,817 Pickaway: Av,ery; Granville: m unity__ 1, 378 Crabtree. 2,254 Gallia: 1 commu- i commu- Stokes: M West A ddison___ 1,835 1 commu nity------2,472 n i t y _____1 2, 971 1 com- Crabtree. 2,405 nity _____ 1, 692 Cheshire __ 1,929 Pike: Brunswick: Haywood: m unity_ 2,032 N Upper Clay 2, 015 1 commu l commu- Beaverdam- 2,130 Surry: South Toe. 1, 998 Gallipolis__ 1,857 nity — _ 1,875 nity------*o Clyde ------2,059 1 com- O Lower Greén . 1,896 Preble: a C.OI?be: Crabtree___ 2,088 m unity_ 2, 884 South Toe. 2, 309 1,802 Greenfield _ 1 commu A Asheville. 2,019 East Fork— 2, 234 Swain: P Pensa- Guyan 1,949 nity _____ 1, 673 - B Avery’s Fines Creek. 2,086 1 00m- c o la ____ 2,517 H arriso n __ 1,814 Ross: Creek — 1,914 Panther munity __ 1, 972 q Prices Huntington. 2,012 1 commu L Black Creek ___ 2,208Transylvania: Creek . . . 2,394 Morgan____ 1,866 Mountain. 2, 089 Ironduff — 1,996 1 com nity ____ 1,741 O h io ______1,801 Scioto: u Broad Ivy Hill—__ 2,149 Perry______1, 919 m unity_1,916 1 commu p ^ er, — 2*134 Jonathan _ 1,999 Raccoon___ 1,874 E Fairview. 2, 018 Pigeon____ 2, 226 nity_____ 1,984 Ohio Springfield- 1,806 Union: _*a , Waynesville. 2, 074 Walnut ____ 1,937 1 com Creek — 2,090 White Oak. 1, 900 Adams: Adams— Continued Greene : munity __ 2 0 G French Henderson: . Bratton . . . 2,014 O liver_____ 1,973 1 commu Vinton: Broad — 2,:i27 1 com- Brush Scott _____ 2,184 nity — 1, 922 1 com H Hominy _ 2,079 munity _. 1, 994 C re e k ___1, 886 Sprigg _____ 1,926 Hamilton : ¿Ivy ------2,191 Iredell: F ran k lin __1,872 munity _ 2,135 Tiffin ______1,987 1 commu Warren: K Leicester. 2 , 189 ! com. G re e n _____ 1, 861 W a y n e ____2, 099 nity — 1, 854 1 com Jefferson__1,976 stmìr o ^ munity „ 2,276 Winchester. 2, 050 munity __ 1,794 ttn e----- 2,001 Jackson: Liberty____2,072 Athens : 1 com- Manchester- 2, 068 P ennsylvania ek — 2,096 m unity__2,010 1 commu Meigs _____1,904 nity _____ 2, 048 Lancaster : See footnotes at end of table. M o n ro e ___1, 844 1 community. 2, 344
No. 25------FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2418 RULES AND REGULATIONS
South Carolina T ennessee— Continued Tennessee—Continued County Cotnmu- County Commu County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average nity yield nity yield nity yield nity . yield nity yield nity yield Cherokee: York: Dyer: Hamblen—Con. Jefferson—-Con. McMinn—Continued 1 com 1 com 1 commu- E ______1,945 H ______1,890 L ______— 1,692 munity __1,645 munity _ *0 n ity -----._ 1,255 P ___*___.__ 2,036 J ______2,069 M ______1,590 Spartanburg: Fentress: G ______.__ 2,141 Johnson: N ______— 1,348 1 com 1 commu- H ______2,193 A ______2,446 O ______— 1,649 munity __12,013 nity — ._ 2,046 J ______2,086 B ______2,284 P ______1,581 Franklin: Hamilton: C ______2,211 Q ------__ 1,659 T ennessee 1 commu- 1 commu- D ______2,424 R ______1,699 Anderson: Claiborne— Con. n ity ___ ._ 1,636 nity __. 1,391 E ______2,455 S ______— 1,571 Giles: Hancock: P ______2,436 T ______— 1,781 1 commu- C _____ ^ 2,286 A ______.__ 2,257 G ______2,287 Macon: n ity ------1,838 D ______2,154 A ______._ 1,444 B ______.__ 2,125 H ______2,453 A ______1,906 Bedford: E ______2,248 B ______968 C ______2,015 J _____ 2, 552 B ______1,891 1 commu- P ______2, 482 C _ ____ ._ 1,621 D ______._ 1,991 D ______.__ 2,036 K ______2,418 C ...... __ 1,568 n ity ------1,563 G ______2, 228 1,814 E ______2,085 Knox: D ______1, 654 Benton: h _ T ennessee— Continued T ennessee—Continued V ir g in ia — Continued County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu- County Commu County Commu- and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity and nity commu- average commu- average commu- average commu- average commu average commu average nity yield nity yield _ nity yield nity yield nity yield nity yield Montgomery— Con. Sevier— Continued Unicoi— Continued White— Continued Franklin: Russell: R ______1,454 L ' ______ï, 862 B ______2,227 J ______1,934 1 commu L e b a n o n __2, 435 S ...... 1,436 M ...... - 1,748 C ______2,140 K _ ____ 2,030 nity ____2,570 Elk Gar T ______1,525 N ______1,816 D ______2,093 L ______1,657 Giles: den _____ 2, 332 Moore: O ______1,519 E ______2,135 M ______1,945 1 commu New Gar 1 commu P N'______1,556 P ______2,202 N _____ 1,994 nity ____2,291 den _____ 2,416 nity _____1,644 Q ______1,680 G ______2,267 Williamson: Grayson: Cleveland _ 2,319 Morgan: R ______1,956 Union : A ______1,663 1 commu M occasin__2, 633 1 commu Smith: j A ______2,165 B ______1,618 nity ____2, 224 Castle- nity ------1, 734 A ______1, 90 8 B ______2,093 C ______1,565 Halifax: wood 2,241 Overton: B ______1,798 C _— ______1,847 D ______1,587 1 commu Copper 1 commu C ...... 1,736 D ______2,187 E ______1,593 nity ____1, 924 Creek __ : 2,579 nity _____1,971 D ______1,847 E ______1,972 P ...... 1,470 Lee: Scott: Pickett: E ______1,762 P ______2,214 G ______1,375 South Jones- < Dekalb ____ 2,136 1 commu P ...... 1,588 G ___;______2,023 H ______1,619 ville ____2, 064 Estillville __ 1,984 nity _____1, 957 G ______1,673 H ______2,039 J ______1,693 Yokum Sta Floyd _____ 2,125 Polk: H ______1, 560 J ...... 2, 149 K ______1,646 tion ____ 2,202 Fulkerson _ 2,110 1 commu J ______- 1,748 K ______2,331 L ______1,569 West Rose Johnson___2,342 nity _- — 1, 559 K ______1,791 L ______2,094 M ______1,482 H i l l ______2,159 Powell ____2,029 Putnam: L ______1, 661 Van Buren: N ______1,449 Rocky Sta Taylor ____ 2,107 A ______1,845 M ______1, 742 1 commu O ______1,596 tion ____ 2,231 Smyth: B ...... - 1,937 N ______1, 702 nity _____ 1, 759 P __;______1,570 White Rich Val C ______1,864 0 ______1, 677 Warren: Q ...... 1,328 S h o a ls __ 2,219 ley ______2,214 D ______1,924 P ______1,635 1 commu R ______1,390 Jonesville _ 2, 341 M a rio n ___2,233 E ______1,814 Stewart : nity _____ 1, 757 S ______1, 703 Rose Hill __ 2,247 St. Clair ___ 2, 361 F ...... 1,841 1 commu Washington: T ______1,381 Madison: Tazewell: G ______2,032 nity _____ 1, 517 A ______2, 111 U ______1,622 1 commu 1 commu H ...... — 1,898 Sullivan: B ______2,144 V ...... 1,612 nity ____2,120 nity _____ 2, 172 J ...... 1, 899 A ______1,974 C ...... 2,258 W ______1, 571 Mecklenburg: Washington: K ______1,767 B ______1,957 D ------2,101 X ______1,545 1 commu Abingdon _ 2, 263 L ______1, 704 C ______2,094 E ______2,197 Wilson: _ nity ____1, 921 Glade M ______1, 674 D _____ 2, 150 P ______2,138 A ______1,529 Montgomery: S p r in g _2, 322 N ______1,635 E ______2,111 G ______2,058 B ______1,662 1 commu North Good- Rhea: P ______2,143 H ______2, 079 C ______1,616 nity ____1,908 son _____2, 363 0 ...... 1,676 G ______2,114 J ------2,176 D ______1,654 Nelson: South Good- P ______1,782 H ______1,999 K ______2,095 E ______1,613 1 commu son _____2, 088 1 commu J ______2, 054 L ______2,104 P _____ 1,651 nity ____ 2,304 H o lsto n ___2, 340 nity ...... 1, 721 K ______1,948 M ______1, 988 G ______1,530 Nottoway: Kinder- Roane: N ______1,971 N ______2,147 H ______1,555 1 commi l- hook ____ 2,250 A ...... 1,415 O ______1, 945 0 ___ 2,232 J ______1,706 nity — _ 1,641 North B ______1,470 P ...... 1,871 P ------2,183 K _.______1,572 Pittsylvania: P o r k ____ 2, 269 C ______1,542 Q ______2,074 Q ______2,149 L ______1,725 1 commu Saltville ___ 2, 239 D ______1,626 S ______2,022 R ______2,300 M ______1,538 nity — 2, 182 Wise: E ...... 1,693 T ______2,088 S ...... 2,174 N ______1,728 Powhatan: 1 commu- P ______1,610 U ______1,932 Weakley: O ______1, 720 1 commu- nity 2, 108 G ------ï, 596 • V ______2, 020 1 commu P ______1,581 _ 1,881 Wythe: Robertson: Sumner: nity ------1,291 Q ______1,734 ■d: 1 commu- A — _____ 1 2,308 A ______1,749 White: R ______1,426 1 commu nity ____ 2, 281 B ...... 2,160 B ______1,878 A ...... 1,903 S ______1,552 nity _ 1,858 C ...... 2,127 C ______1,635 B ------2,094 T — ^ _____ 1,512 Pulaski : D ------2,012 D ______1,808 C ------1,830 U ...... 1,572 1 commu E ...... 1,965 E ______1,668 D ----- _ ~ r_ 1,834 V . 1,456 nity __. _ 1,718 P ...... 1,706 P ______1,533 E ______1,933 W ___...... 1, 622 G ...... 1,858 G ______1,580 P ------1,805 X ______1,402 W est V ir g in ia H ------1,841 H ______1,798 G ------1,691 V ...... 1,523 Boone : Logan: J ------__ 1, 955 J ...... 1,858 H ______1,988 Z ______1,843 K ...... 1,961 1 commu 1 commu- K ______1,723 nity — ._ 1,799 n ity ------1, 735 L ------1,830 L ______1,531 V ir g in ia M — ...... 1,831 Cabell: McDowell: M ______1,425 Albemarle: Campbell: Barbours- 1 commu- N ...... 1,980 N ______1,758 1 commu 0 ....i,9H 1 commu- v i l l e __ ._ 1,714 nity------51, 601 O ______1,879 nity — 1, 850 nity _____2,183 Grant ___ ._ 1,812 P ...... 1,850 Mason: P ______1,971 Amelia: Carroll: McComas _ Q —------1,950 ._ 1,716 A rb u c le ___ 1, 786 Q ...... 2,227 1 commu 1 commu- U n io n ____._ 1,851 Clendenln _ 1,781 R ...... 1,898 R ______2,013 nity ---- 1,798 nity ______1,002 S ------2,131 Greenbrier: C ooper____ 1,837 S ______1,963 Appomattox: Charlotte: 1 commu C ologne___ 1, 853 Rutherford: T ...... 1,973 1 commu 1 commu- 1 commu- nity — _12, 400 Graham- U ______1,756 nity — 1, 796 nity ______1,878 Jackson: Waggen- „ nity------. 1,485 V ______1,932 Scott: Bedford: Cumberland: 1 commu e r ______1,327 W _____:____2, 251 1 commu- 1 commu 1 commu- nity — ._ 1,900 Hannan ___ 1,866 X ...... 2, 159 nity — 1,754 nity ------1,623 Kanawha: Lewis- _ nity — . . 2,051 V ______1,799 Bland: Dickenson: 1 commu Robinson. 1, 864 Sevier: Z ______1,803 1 commu 1 commu- nity — - 1,712 Union __•___ 1, 742 £ —...... 1,744 Trousdale : Lincoln: Mercer: ® ...... — 1, 672 nity — 2, 237 nity ____ 2, 073 A ------1,786 C arro ll__ ._ 1,783 1 commu- S ...... - 1,949 Brunswick: Dinwiddle: B ______1,836 Duval- n ity ------2, 205 1,885 C ...... 1,728 1 commu 1 commu- Washing- Monroe: 1, 797 D ______1,798 nity — 2,167 nity ____ 1,944 ton ___ 1, 760 1 commu- 1, 895 E ------1,775 Buchanan: Floyd: Harts- n ity ------2, 278 1,845 F —...... 1,695 1 commu 1 commu- Laurel 2,071 Putnam: G ______1, 819 nity ____ 2.049 nity ____ 1,854 H i l l ___ ._ 1,725 1,780 Northside _ 1,916 Unicoi: Buckingham: Fluvanna: Jefferson .._ 1,980 1,804 A _____ 2,215 Southside _ 1,743 1 commu 1 commu- Sheridan _ 1,695 See footnotes at end of table. nity ___ - 1,908 nity 1,507 U n io n ____ 1,887 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2420 RULES AND REGULATIONS W est V irginia—Continued cumstances, for preparation for such tee, established under the said amended County Comma- County Comma- effective time; and good cause exists for marketing agreement and order, and and nity and nity making the provisions hereof effective comma- average comma- average upon other available information, it is nity yield nity yield as hereinafter set forth. The committee hereby found that the limitation of han Raleigh: Wayne : held an open meeting during the current dling of such lemons, as hereinafter pro 1 comma 1 comma week, after giving due notice thereof, to vided, will tend to effectuate the de nity — 1,853 n ity __ — 1,904 consider supply and market conditions clared policy of the act. Ritchie: Wirt: for navel oranges and the need for regu (2) It is hereby further found that it 1 cornimi 1 comma lation; interested persons were afforded is impracticable and contrary to the nity 1,629 nity ___ 2,082 an opportunity to submit information public interest to give preliminary Roane: Wood: and views at this meeting; the recom 1 cornimi 1 comma notice, engage in public rule-making n i t y _ __ 2,180 nity _ 1,869 mendation and supporting information procedure, and postpone the effective Summers: for regulation during the period specified date of this section until 30 days after 1 comma herein were promptly submitted to the publication hereof in the F ederal R egis nity ___ 2,835 Department after such meeting was held; ter (5 U.S.C. 1001-1011) because the the provisions of this section, including time intervening between the date when 1 Adjusted in accordance with the Act. its effective time, are identical with the information upon which this section is 2 No hurley production during the period aforesaid recommendation of the com based became available and the time 1959—63. mittee, and information concerning such when this section must become effective (Secs. 317, 375, 79 Stat. 66, 52 Stat. 66, as provisions and effective time has been in order to effectuate the declared policy amended; 7 U.S.C. 1314c, 1375) disseminated among handlers of such of the act is insufficient, and a reasonable Effective date. Date of filing this doc navel oranges; it is necessary, in order time is permitted, under the circum ument with the Director, Office of the to effectuate the declared policy of the stances, for preparation for such effec Federal Register. act, to make this section effective during tive time; and good cause exists for mak Signed at Washington, D.C., on Jan the period herein specified; and com ing the provisions hereof effective as uary 27, 1966. pliance with this section will not require hereinafter set forth. The committee held an open meeting during the current O rville L. F reeman, any special preparation on the part of Secretary. persons subject hereto which cannot be week, after giving due notice thereof, to completed on or before the effective date consider supply and market conditions [F.R. Doc. 66-1090; Filed, Jan. 28, 1966; hereof. Such committee meeting was 9:38 a.m.] for lemons and the need for regula held on February 3,1966. tion; interested persons were afforded an (b) Order. (1) The respective quanopportunity to submit information and Chapter IX— Consumer and Market tities of Navel oranges grown in Arizona views at this ineeting; the'recommenda ing Service (Marketing Agreements and designated part of California which tion and supporting information for and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, may be handled during the period be regulation during the period specified Nuts), Department of Agriculture ginning at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., February 6, herein were promptly submitted to the 1966, and ending at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., Department after such meeting was [Navel Orange Reg. 99] February 13, 1966, are hereby fixed as held; the provisions of this section, in PART 907— NAVEL ORANGES follows: cluding its effective time, are identical GROWN IN ARIZONA AND DES (1) District 1: 950,000 cartons; with the aforesaid recommendation of IGNATED PART OF CALIFORNIA (ii) District 2: 425,000 cartons; the committee, and information con (iii) District 3: Unlimited movement; cerning such provisions and effective Limitation of Handling (iv) District 4: Unlimited movement. time has been disseminated among han dlers of such lemons; it is necessary, in § 907.399 Navel Orange Regulation 99. (2) As used in this section, “handled," “District 1,” “District 2,” “District 3," order to effectuate the declared policy (a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the“District 4,” and “ carton" have the same of the act, to make this section effective marketing agreement, as amended, and meaning as when used in said amended during the period herein specified; and Order No. 907, as amended (7 CFR Part marketing agreement and order. compliance with this section will not re 907), regulating the handling of Navel quire any special preparation on the oranges grown in Arizona and designated (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674) part of persons subject hereto which part of California, effective under the cannot be completed on or before the applicable provisions of the Agricultural Dated: February 4, 1966. effective date hereof. Such committee Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as P aul A. N ic h o lso n , meeting was held on February 1, 1966. amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and upon Acting Director, Fruit and Vege FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2421 Part 121. This oversight has created in accordance with a continuous air Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND considerable confusion and the pro worthiness maintenance program under visions of § 21.337 require clarification. Part 121 or 127 of the Federal Aviation SPACE For this reason, the requirements of Regulations or a progressive inspection § 21.337 have been amended consistent program under Part 91 of the Federal Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency with the foregoing to include air carriers, Aviation Regulations. [Docket No. 7136; Amdt. No. 21-8] commercial operators and the holders of Since these amendments remove un- inspection authorizations. necsessary restrictions, are clarifying in PART 21-— CERTIFICATION PROCE^ In addition to the foregoing, the pro nature and impose no additional burden DURES FOR PRODUCTS AND PARTS visions of § 21.329 have been amended by on any person, notice and public proce deleting the requirement that used en dure hereon are unnecessary and they Export Airworthiness Approval gines, propellers and appliances being may be made effective on less than 30 Procedures ëkported as part of an aircraft must days’ notice. The purpose of this amendment to have been overhauled within the last 500 In consideration of the foregoing, Part Part 21 of the Federal Aviation Regula hours’ time in service prior to being ex 21 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, tions is to clarify the existing regulations ported. The Agency now considers that (14 CFR Part 21) is amended effective concerning those persons authorized to this requirement is unnecessary for the January 28,1966 as follows: purpose of establishing the airworthiness perform the inspections required for cer 1. Section 21.329 is amended by strik tain classes of export approval and to of such, products in the light of the exist ing out present paragraph (e) and by delete the overhaul requirement pres ing requirement that used aircraft being redesignating paragraphs (f) and (g) as exported must have undergone a periodic ently applicable to used engines, pro paragraphs (e) and ( f ), and by amend inspection and be approved for return pellers, and appliances, exported as a ing paragraph (c) to read as follows: part of an aircraft* to service. Under a periodic inspection, Under the current requirements of the condition of the engines, propellers § 21.329 Issue o f Export Certificates of § 21.329, used aircraft must have under and appliances installed on an aircraft Airworthiness for Class I Products. gone a periodic inspection and be ap must be investigated and if it is found * * * * * proved for return to service in that an overhaul of such engines, propel (c) Used aircraft must have under accordance with the applicable provi lers or appliances is necessary in order gone a periodic type inspection and be sions of Part 43 of the Federal Aviation to make them airworthy, the aircraft approved for return to service in ac Regulations. In addition, used engines cannot be approved for return to service cordance with Part 43 of this Chapter. and propellers which are not being ex until such overhaul has been performed. The inspection must have been per ported as part of a certificated aircarft As amended herein, only the necessary formed and properly documented within must have been newly overhauled. In overhauls of used engines, propellers and 30 days before the date the application accordance with the provisions of Part appliances need be performed and ex is made for an export certificate of air 43, mechanics holding inspection au porters would be relieved of the substan worthiness. In complying with this thorizations are authorized to perform tial economic burden of overhauling paragraph, consideration may be given periodic inspections and overhauls to the engines, propellers, and appliances re to the inspections performed on an air extent provided in Part 65 of the Federal gardless of the actual condition of such craft maintained in accordance with a Aviation Regulations and air carriers products as required under the current continuous airworthiness maintenance and commercial operators are authorized rules. program under Parts 121 or 127 of this to perform similar functions as provided Finally, as noted above, § 21.329(c) re Chapter or a progressive inspection pro in Parts 121 or 127 of the Federal Avia quires that used aircraft must have gram under Part 91 of this Chapter, tion Regulations. Under Parts 121 and undergone a periodic inspection and be within the 30 days prior to the date the 127, air carriers are limited to the per approved for return to service in accord application is made for an export formance of maintenance on their own ance with the applicable provisions of certificate of airworthiness. or other air carrier aircraft in accord Part 43 of the Federal Aviation Regula * * * * * ance with applicable continuous air tions. In addition, it requires that this worthiness maintenance programs and inspection must have been performed 2. Section 21.337 is amended by add commercial operators are limited to per within 30 days before the date the appli ing new paragraphs (d ), (e ), and ( f ) to forming maintenance on their own air cation is made for an export certificate read as follows: craft in accordance with such programs, of airworthiness. The requirement for a § 21.337 Performance o f inspection and and the Agency has applied such limita periodic inspection was intended only to overhauls. tions to their performance of the neces identify the scope of the inspection * * * * * sary inspections and overhauls for ex which the Agency considers necessary port approvals. However, notwithstand for export approval of used aircraft and (d) The holder of an inspection au ing the foregoing, the present provisions the rule has been' amended to make this thorization as provided in Part 65 of this of § 21.337 do not list air carriers, com clear. Moreover, it has been brought to Chapter. mercial operators or persons holding in the attention of the Agency that the re (e) An air carrier, when the product spection authorizations as being au quirement for a periodic type of inspec is one that the carrier has maintained thorized, under any condition, to per tion does not take into proper account under its own or another air carrier’s form the inspections and overhauls re the scope of the other forms of inspec continuous airworthiness maintenance quired for export airworthiness approval. tions used on civil aircraft. In this con program and maintenance manuals as The notice of proposed rule making that nection, the present requirement requires provided in Parts 121 or 127 of this preceded the adoption of present § 21.337 a complete periodic type inspection Chapter. hsted air carriers as persons authorized notwithstanding that some of the (f) A commercial operator, when the to perform the required inspections and inspections required under a periodic product is one that the operator has overhauls for export approval. How- inspection may have already been maintained under its continuous air ver, as the preamble of the final amend accomplished under an established con worthiness maintenance program and ment clearly indicates, air carriers were tinuous airworthiness maintenance pro maintenance manual as provided in Part not included in the provisions of § 21.337 gram or progressive inspection program 121 of this Chapter. ?. pr,?pose(* in order to remove the im- within the 30 days prior to the date that (Secs. 313(a), 601 and 603, Federal Aviation p ication that the air carriers could per- the application for export approval was Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1354, 1421 and 1423) rm the required inspections and over- made. Therefore, to prevent the unnec Wlth0ut limitations and not to pre- essary duplication of inspections, the Issued in Washington, D.C„ on Janu fnn/L» cajfriers from performing such provisions of § 21.329(c) have been ary 28,1966. hv d i ns within limitations imposed amended to permit consideration of in W il l ia m F. M cK ee, Z 121 and 127. This would also spections performed within 30 days prior Administrator. tore P?llcJable now t° commercial opera to the date an application is made for [F.R. Doc. 66-1254; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; conducting their operations under export approval on aircraft maintained 8:45 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2422 RULES AND REGULATIONS {Docket No. 1447; Amdt. 39-190] [Docket No. 7138; Amdt. 89-191] . [Airspace Docket No. 65-WE-64] PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVES AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS Lockheed Models 188A and 188C General Electric CJ805 Series Engines Series Airplanes Alteration and Designation of Control There has been a complete failure of a Amendment 514 (27 P.R. 11991), AD Zones, Alteration and Designation second stage turbine disc in a General of Transition Areas and Revocation 62-26-4, as amended by Amendment 736 Electric CJ805-3 turbojet engine. Since (29 F.R. 6849) requires inspection, and this condition is likely to exist or develop of Control Area Extensions replacement where necessary, of the ele in other engines of the same type design, On August 25, 1965, a notice of pro vator balance weight arms on Lockheed an airworthiness directive is being issued posed rule making was published in the Models 188A and 188C Series airplanes. to require removal from service of second F ederal R egister (30 F.R^ 10996) stating Subsequent to the issuance of Amend stage turbine discs after 7,000 cycles. that the Federal Aviation Agency pro ment 736 the Agency has determined that As a situation exists which demands posed to alter the controlled airspace in the modification in accordance with immediate adoption of this regulation, it the Port Angeles and Whidbey Island, Revision B of the manufacturer’s service is found that notice and public proce Wash., terminal areas. bulletin specified in paragraph (f) of dure hereon are impracticable and good Interested persons were afforded an the AD could result in interference at the cause exists for making this amendment opportunity to participate in the rule trailing edge of the horizontal stabilizer. effective in less than 30 days. making through submission of com The manufacturer has issued a later re In consideration of the foregoing, and ments. All comments received were vision to the service bulletin that pro pursuant to the authority delegated to favorable except the Aircraft Owners vides a revised modification that will me by the Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), and Pilots Association objected to the eliminate this interference. It is there § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Avia dimensions of the proposed 700-foot fore necessary to amend the AD to re tion Regulations is amended by adding transition area. quire an inspection for interference and the following new airworthiness direc A subsequent review of the airspace compliance with the latest revision of the tive: requirements in the Whidbey Island area manufacturer’s service bulletin if inter disclosed that air traffic control proce ference is found. General Electric. Applies to Models CJ805- dures would not be derogated by raising As a situation exists which demands 3, -3A, -33, -23, -23B, and -23C turbojet the floor of a portion of the proposed immediate adoption of this regulation, engines. 700-foot transition area to 1,200 feet it is found that notice and public pro above- the surface. In addition two cedure are impracticable and good cause Compliance required as Indicated. To prevent the failure of second stage tur TACAN instrument approach procedures exists for making this amendment effec bine discs, accomplish the following: were cancelled and eliminated the re tive in less than 30 days. (a) Remove from service second stage tur quirement for the control zone extensions In consideration of the foregoing, and bine discs with less than 7,000 cycles on the SW of Whidbey Island, Wash. (Ault pursuant to the authority delegated to effective date of this AD before the accumu Field NAS and Oak Harbor NAS). me by the Administrator (25 P.R. 6489), lation of 7,200 cycles. These modifications are reflected in the § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Aviation (b) Remove from service second stage tur final rule. Regulations, Amendment 514 (27 P.R. bine discs with 7,000 or more cycles on the In consideration of the foregoing, Part 11991), AD 62-26-4, as amended by effective date of this AD within the next 200 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Amendment 786 (29 P.R. 6849) is further cycles. is amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., March amended by amending paragraph (f) to (c) For the purpose of this AD, the num 31, 1966 as hereinafter set forth: read as follows: ber of cycles equals the number of flights 1. In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 17581) the fol that involve an engine operating sequence (f) The periodic inspections of (a), (b), lowing control zone is added: and (e) may be discontinued after compU- consisting of engine starting, takeoff opera ance with either of the following— tion, landing, and engine shutdown. The P ort A ngeles, Wash. (1) Modify elevator assembly in accord number of cycles may be determined by Within a 5-mile radius of CGAS Port An ance with sections 2.A through 2.W of Lock actual count or, subject to acceptance by the geles (latitude 48°08'30" N., longitude heed Service Bulletin 88/SB-567C or later assigned FAA maintenance inspector, may be 123°24'45" W .), within 2 miles each side of FAA-approved revision; or calculated by dividing each second stage the Port Angeles VOR 093° radial, extending (2) If elevator assembly has been modified turbine disc’s hours’ time in service by the from the 5-mile radius zone to 8 miles E of before February 3, 1966, in accordance with the VOR, and within 2 miles each side of the operator’s fleet average time per flight (in sections 2.A through 2.S of Lockheed Service 089° bearing from the Ediz Hook, Wash., Bulletin 88/SB—567B, inspect the horizontal volving an engine operating sequency con RBN, extending from the 5-mile radius zone stabilizer throughout the elevator travel for sisting of engine starting, takeoff operation, to 8 miles E of the RBN. This control zone interference. landing, and engine shutdown) for airplanes is effective 0400 to 2200 hours, local time, (i) If interference exists, modify the ele equipped with General Electric CJ805 daily. vator assembly in accordance with sections engines. 2.A through 2.W of Lockheed Service Bulle (General Electric telegram to CJ805 oper 2. In § 71.171 (29 F.R. 17640) the tin 88/SB—567C or later PAA-approved ators dated December 1,1965, pertains to this Whidbey Island, Wash., control zone is revision. subject.) amended as follows: (ii) If no interference exists, no further action is necessary. This amendment becomes effective W hidbey I sland, Wash. This amendment becomes effective February 3,1966. Within a 5-mile radius of Ault Field, February 3,1966. Whidbey Island, Wash, (latitude 48°21'10 (Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation N„ longitude 122°39'20" W .); within » (Secs. 313(a), 601, and 603, Federal Aviation Act Of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1854(a), 1421, 1423) 5-mile radius of the INT of the N/S an Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and Issued in Washington, D.C., on Janu E/W sealane landing areas (latitude 1423) 48°15'55" N„ longitude 122°35'15" W.) 0»K ary 28,1966. Issued in Washington, D.C., on Jan Harbor Seaplane Base, Whidbey 181311 ’ C. W . W alker, Wash.; within a 1-mile radius of OLF Ooupe- uary 27,1966. Director, G. S. M oore, ville Airport, Coupeville, Wash. Director, Flight Standards Service. Flight Standards Service. 48° 11'20" N., longitude 122°37'50' within 2 miles each side of the Whidy [F.R. Doo. 66-1255; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; [F.R. Doc. 66-1293; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] 8:46 am.] Island TAOAN 851° radia!, extending n FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25-— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2423 the 6-mile radius zone to 7.6 miles N of the B e l l in g h a m , W a s h . F ederal R egister (30 F.R. 15599) stating TACAN. That airspace extending upward from 700 that the Federal Aviation Agency pro 3. In § 71.181 <29 FJt. 17691) the Port feet above the surface bounded on the B by posed to alter the Burbank Transition Angeles, Wash., transition area is longitude 122*15'00" W , on the S by lati area, realign VOR Federal Airways Nos. amended as follows: tude 48°52*00" N., and on the W and N by V-186 and V-518 and designate a new the United States/Canadian border. airway FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 196« 2424 RULES AND REGULATIONS Chapter II— Civil Aeronautics Board lie* Other than the provision of the no real difficulties in ascertaining what UATP with respect to the payment of are the basic features of UATP as dis SUBCHAPTER A— ECONOMIC REGULATIONS interest on customers’ deposits,4 the tinguished from the minor details since [Reg. ER-451] Board is not aware that any such tariffs the carriers, as well as the Board, have presently on file are not adequate with been distinguishing between basic fea PART 221— CONSTRUCTION, PUBLI respect to the credit plan rules contained tures and minor details in UATP filings CATION, FILING AND POSTING OF therein. for a number of years. Moreover, we TARIFFS OF AIR CARRIERS AND 1. Eastern objected to the proposed have made it clear in the rule that the FOREIGN AIR CARRIERS rule on the ground, inter alia, that it basic features of passenger credit plans would require air carriers like Eastern include (1) à definite time within which Passenger Credit Plans with both domestic and international a passenger is required to pay thé car Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board routes and with two sets of fares tariffs rier for the transportation and other at its Office in Washington, D.C., on the and two sets of governing rules tariffs to services purchased on credit; (2) the 2d day of February I960. republish the identical credit plan data amount of money, if any, which a pas In a notice of proposed rule making in two governing rules tariffs. It main senger will be required to keep on con published in the F ederal R egister on tained that such procedure is wasteful; tinuous deposit with the carrier, and the August 21, 1965 (30 F.R. 10907) and cir and that the Board should modify the rate of interest which the carrier will pay culated to the industry as EDR-88, Dock rule so as to permit publication of a the passenger on such deposit; and (3) et 16416, the Board proposed to amend carrier’s passenger credit plan data in any charges which the passenger will be Part 221 of its Economic Regulations a single, separate, governing rules tariff. required to pay the carrier in connection (14 CFR Part 221) to conform its regula This suggestion has merit and has been with the extension of credit, including tions to Board opinions requiring air car adopted.® (See § 221.107a, infra.) but not limited to charges for credit in riers and foreign air carriers to file with 2. Eastern also asserted, as did United, vestigations, interest or other charges for the Board passenger credit plans as that there are insurmountable difficulties the extension of credit, or penalties for tariffs. In the notice, the Board invited in distinguishing between the “principal late payments. For the above reasons, interested persons to submit pertinent features” of a particular credit plan there is no substance to the carriers’ ob information and data with respect to the which must be published in a tariff and jections based upon alleged difficulties in proposed rule. the “minor details” thereof which may distinguishing between basic features and Pursuant to the above notice, three be set forth in a manual filed with the minor details of UATP. comments were received, two from U.S. Board but not filed as a tariff document. 3. Trans-Texas favors a rule which trunkline carriers1 and the third from a In this connection, Eastern refers to the would require a general description of local service carrier.2 difference of opinion relating to the pro passenger credit plans such as UATP, Interested persons have been afforded visions governing the payment of inter on-line credit cards, American Express an opportunity to participate in the mak est on UATP deposits, the carrier ap credit cards, and states that anything ing of this rule, and due consideration parently considering such provisions as beyond this, such as requiring the filing has been given to all relevant matter minor details whereas the notice states of a complete tariff reflecting rules, regu presented. The rule as proposed would that these will henceforth be treated as lations and practices relative to the (1) require air carriers and foreign air basic features, necessitating their inclu extension of credit, would be unduly carriers to file with the Board as a tariff sion in tariff filings. burdensome to the air carriers concerned. filing the basic features of passenger Although the proposed rule would have It further avers that many details of credit plans and amendments thereto given carriers the option of filing all fea credit arrangements are constantly un that involve air transportation within the tures of passenger credit plans as tariff dergoing change and that it is some meaning of the Act; and (2) permit such documents or setting forth the basic times impossible to determine in advance carriers, in lieu of setting forth the minor features of such plans in a tariff and the exact details of the crédit arrange details of the plans as tariff documents, referring therein to a manual filed with ments for certain types of transactions. to refer in the tariff to a manual for such the Board for the minor details, we have Eastern objects also to the provision in details as is currently done with the Uni modified it by precluding the filing of the proposed rule that when references versal Air Travel Plan (U A T P ), the plan manuals except in the case of UATP. to a manual are set forth in a tariff, the predominantly used for passenger credit. Thus, the final rule has eliminated the referenced portion of a manual shall be For the reasons set forth herein, we shall necessity for carriers making a distinc posted in accordance with the provisions tion between basic features and minor modify the rule as proposed in two re of Subpart N of Part 221 (14 CFR Part details except with respect to UATP. spects: (1) We shall authorize publica 221). According to Eastern, such a post As to this type of credit plan, the car tion of credit plan data in a governing ing requirement would be unduly burden riers can avoid making this distinction by credit plan tariff in order to eliminate some to the carriers concerned. not filing a manual and by placing all Turning first to Trans-Texas’ objec the need for duplicate publication of terms relating thereto in a tariff docu credit plan rules when a carrier has more tion, we find that carrier’s contentions ment. In addition, we believe there are than one governing rules tariff to which unpersuasive. A general description of the same credit plan appertains (see credit plans without providing details 8 Inherent in each carrier’s tariff (whether thereof would be ineffective as a means § 221.107a, infra); and (2) except with or not expressly set forth therein) is the gen respect to UATP, we shall eliminate any eral rule that charges for transportation shall of informing the public of the particu reference to a manual in the tariff rule. he prepaid unless credit is extended to the lars of passenger credit plans and prac Other than these changes and minor purchaser of transportation services pursu tices and would therefore frustrate the clarifying and editorial modifications, ant to rules expressly set forth in the tariff. primary purpose of the instant rule. 4 The notice stated that one of the basic the final rule is the one initially proposed. Eastern’s objection to the posting re features of the UATP credit plan which must quirement is likewise without merit. In Discussion. At the outset it should be be set forth in a tariff filing is the rule gov the first place, since we are eliminating observed that the tariffs of a number of erning the payment of interest on UATP any reference in the rule to manuals carriers currently on file with the Board deposits. The final rule promulgated herein except with respect to UATP, Eastern’s do set forth various types of passenger affirms this requirement (see § 221.38(i) (1), infra). objection is applicable only to a UATP credit plans offered to the general pub- 6 Under the rule, a carrier may publish manual. In this context, the carrier has one governing credit plan tariff which can presented no facts to support its objec 1 Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (Eastern), and be made applicable to either property tariffs United Air Lines (United) . or passenger tariffs, but the same credit plan tion and the Board believes that the post 2 Trans-Texas Airways, Inc. (Trans-Texas). tariff cannot govern both types of tariffs. ing of those portions of the UATP manual FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2425 referred to In a tariff is necessary* to the transportation of persons, including fares, or charges to be collected by such apprise the public of all credit rules passengers’ baggage, their charges, rules, carrier and which are applicable to adopted by a particular carrier and to regulations, and practices relating to the through transportation performed by facilitate enforcement of the Board’s extension of credit for payment of such carrier in conjunction with con tariff regulation.7 charges applicable to such transporta necting carriers regardless of whether In view of the fact that EDR-88 pro tion services (including services inciden such transportation is subject to a posed to authorize the filing of manuals tal thereto). Such tariff provisions for through joint fare or rate or a combina (but not as tariff documents) in .which extension of credit shall include but are tion of separately established fares or carriers could set forth the minor details not limited to (i) a definite time within rates of the respective carriers. . of passenger credit plans, whereas the which a passenger is required to pay the * * * * * fna.1 rule restricts the filing of manuals carrier for the transportation and other 2. By amending the table of contents services purchased on credit; (ii) the to UATP,8 we shall permit interested per of Part 221 by adding a new § 221.107a to sons to petition for reconsideration of amount of money, if any, which a pas read as follows: • the partial elimination of this provision senger will , be required to keep on con from the final rule. Ten (10) copies tinuous deposit with the carrier, and the 221.107a Credit plan tariff. of such petitions should be filed with rate of interest which the carrier will pay 3. By adding a new § 221.107a to au the Docket Section, Civil Aeronautics the passenger on such deposit; and (iii) thorize a carrier to publish its credit plan Board, Washington, D.C., 20428, on or any charges which the passenger will be information in a separate governing before February 23, 1966. Copies of any required to pay the carrier in connection credit plan tariff, as follows: petition filed will be available for exam with the extension of credit, including ination by interested persons in the but not limited to charges for credit in § 221.107a Credit plan tariff. Docket Section o f the Board, Room 710, vestigations, interest or other charges I f desired, credit plan data required Universal Building, Washington, D.C. for the extension of credit, or penalties by § 221.38 (i) may be published in a sep The filing of petitions for reconsidera for late payments. Nothing in this rule arate governing credit plan tariff con tion will not operate to stay the effective is intended to preclude the filing of a forming to §§ 221.100 and 221.101 in lieu date of the rule. manual embodying the minor details of of including such rules or regulations in In addition to the amendments pre the Universal Air Travel Han (UATP) .* the fares tariffs or rates tariffs which viously discussed, the final rule contains However, the rules governing the pay they govern, or in the governing rules certain editorial and clarifying modifies ment of interest on UATP deposits made tariffs authorized by § 221.102. tions. (See § 221.38(i) No. 25----- 8 FEDERAI REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2426 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2.90) , Part 121 is amended by adding to (a) The additive is the chemical N'- cord duty free entry and other privileges Subpart C the following new section: (6-ethoxy-3-pyridazinyl) sulfanilamide to materials covered by them. As of (CiaHuHiOsS). It has a melting-point § 121.280 Sulfaethoxypyridazine. January 1, 1965, the Agency had issued range of 180° C.-1860 C. 22,182 certificates covering an estimated The food additive sulfaethoxypyrida (b) The additive is used or intended 150,000 items of visual and auditory ma zine may be safely used in accordance for use as sole medication as prescribed terial. A number of the certificates with the following prescribed conditions: in the following table: cover materials arranged in series form. T able 1—Sulfaethoxypyridazine fob Swine ***** Paragraph (c) of § 502.4 is amended to Principal Amount Combined Amount Limitations Indications for use read as follows: ingredient with— § 502.4 Interpretation o f criteria. G ra m * ***** p er to n 1. Sulfaethoxy- 1000 In feed: Administer not less Treatment of bacterial (c) The Agency does not certify ma pyridazine. (0.11%) than 4 days nor more than 10 scours (necro, salmonel terials which by special pleading attempt days; withdraw 10 days before losis), pneumonia- to influence opinion, conviction or policy slaughter; do not use sulfaeth- enteritis, bronchitis, oxypyridazine-medicated septicemia accompanying (religious, economic, or political propa feed and medicated water Salmonella chdlerasuis ganda) , to inculcate any dogma, to con simultaneously. infection. G ra m » p e r stitute a ritual or denominational serv g a llo n ice. Visual and auditory materials in 2. Sulfaethoxy- 1. 9-3.8 In drinking water: Administer Do. pyridazine. (0.05%- 3.8 grams per gallon for first tended for use in denominational pro 0.1%) day followed by 1.9 grams per grams of moral and religious'education gallon for not less than 3 days and which otherwise meet the criteria nor more than 9 days; with draw 10 days before slaughter; set forth under § 502.3 may be deter do not use sulfaethoxypyrida- mined eligible for certification. zine-medicated feed and medicated water simultane The introductory text of § 502.8 is ously. amended as follows: ♦ * * * * (c) To assure safe use, the label andtions are supported by grounds legally labeling of the additive, any feed additive § 502.8 Method of requesting certifica sufficient to justify the relief sought. tion. supplement, feed additive concentrate, Objections may be accompanied by a feed additive premix, or complete feed or memorandum or brief in support thereof. Application for certification of the in other dosage form prepared therefrom, ternational educational character of shall bear, in addition to the other infor Effective date. This order shall be visual and auditory material must be mation required by the act, the follow effective on the date of its publication in made to the Agency by the American ing: the F ederal R egister. owner of the right to reproduce it. Ap (1) The name of the additive. (Sec. 409(c) (I), (4), 72 Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.O. plication is made on Forms IAP 1, IAP 2, (2) A statement of the quantity of the 348(c) (1), (4)) IA P 3, IAP 4, and IA P 8. A form should additive contained therein.^ Dated: January27,1966. be executed for each subject or series it (3) Adequate directions and warnings is desired to have considered for certifi for use. J. K. K ir k , cation. As a part of the application, the 2. Based upon an evaluation of the Assistant Commissioner following should also be submitted. data before him, and proceeding under for Operations. * * * * * the authority of the Federal Food, Drug, [F.R. Doc. 66-1297; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; Section 502.10 is revised as follows: / and Cosmetic Act (sec. 409(c)(4), 72 8:47 a.m.] Stat. 1786; 21 U.S.C. 3 4 8 (c)(4 )), the § 502.10 Certain governments recogniz Commissioner has concluded that where ing certificates or finding them help swine have been treated with sulfaethox fu l in establishing the educational ypyridazine in accordance with § 121.280, Title 22— FOREIGN RELATIONS character o f imported materials. a tolerance limitation is required to as (a) The following are among the gov sure that the edible products of swine Chapter V— United States Information . ernments reported as recognizing the are safe for human consumption. Ac Agency certificates outright or finding them cordingly, Part 121 is amended by adding PART 502— CERTAIN MEASURES TO helpful in making local determination of to Subpart D the following new section : the educational character of materials FACILITATE THE CIRCULATION § 121.1144 Sulfaethoxypyridazine. covered: ABROAD OF AMERICAN-MADE Bermuda, Canada, Ceylon, Costa A tolerance of zero is established for VISUAL AND AUDITORY EDUCA Denmark, Dominican Republic, Dutch Gu - residues of sulfaethoxypyridazine in the TIONAL MATERIALS ana, El Salvador, Ecuador, Gibraltar, Greece, edible tissues of Swine. Guatemala, Haiti, India, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Miscellaneous Amendments Liberia, Malta, New Zealand, Nic“ ®fu. ’ Any person who will be adversely af Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Rhodesia fected by the foregoing order may at any Revised paragraphs of Part 502 (which and Nyasaland (Fed. of), Spain, Sw ’ time within 30 days from the date of its formerly appeared in 18 F.R. 8696, Dec. Taiwan (Rep. of China), Trinidad, Turkey, publication in the F ederal R egister file 24, 1953) are set forth below: Uruguay. with the Hearing Clerk, Department of Paragraph (b) of § 502.1 is amended (b) Certain countries also have sifted Health, Education, and Welfare, Room to read as follows: and ratified the Agreement for Facilitat 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., ing the International Circulation o Washington, D.C., 20201, written objec § 502.1 Background and function o f the Visual and Auditory Materials of an a* tions thereto, preferably in quintuplicate. Attestation program. cational, Scientific and Cultural Cha Objections shall show wherein the person * * * '# * ter which provides for the recognitio filing will be adversely affected by the (b) This program facilitates the circertified visual and auditory Jj order and specify with particularity the culation abroad of eligible American (1) This agreement has been ratmea provisions of the order deemed objection visual and auditory materials by certi by the following countries: able and the grounds for the objections. fication of their international education Brazil, Cambodia, Canada, Denmark, If a hearing is requested, the objections al character. Certificates issued in con Salvador, Ghana, Greece, Haiti, Iran, Iraq, must state the issues for the hearing. sequence of this program are recognized Malagasy Republic, Norway, Pakistan, ru A hearing will be granted if the objec- by certain other governments, which ac ippines, Syria, Yugoslavia. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2427 (2) In addition the following coun Dated: January 26,1966. tries have signed but have not yet Title 26— INTERNAL REVENUE N icholas deB. K atzenbach, ratified: Chapter I— Infernal Revenue Service, Attorney General. Afghanistan, Dominican Republic, Ecua Department of the Treasury [F.R. Doc. 66-1264; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; dor, Lebanon, Netherlands, United States of 8:45 a.m.] America, Uruguay. The United States has SUBCHAPTER A— INCOME TAX signed the Agreement; in 1960 the Senate gave its consent to ratification. The Con [TD . 6873] gress has draft enabling legislation under PART 1— IN CO M E TAX; TAXABLE consideration. Title 33— NAVIGATION AND YEARS BEGINNING AFTER DECEM The introductory text of § 502.12 is re BER 31, 1953 NAVIGABLE WATERS vised as follows: Interest on Certain Deferred Chapter I— Coast Guard, Department § 502.12 Motion picture and filmstrip of the Treasury catalogue« Payments Correction, SUBCHAPTER D— NAVIGATION REQUIREMENTS For circulation abroad, the Agency FOR CERTAIN INLAND WATERS compiles and publishes a catalogue en In F.R. Doc. 66-656 appearing at page [CGFR 66—1] titled “United States Educational, Scien 941 in the issue for Tuesday, January tific and Cultural Motion Pictures and 25, 1966, the following corrections are PART 82— BOUNDARY LINES OF Filmstrips Selected and Available for Use made. INLAND WATERS Abroad.” It is the purpose of this cata 1. The computation in § 1.483-1 (f) logue to facilitate the circulation abroad (5), Example (2 ), item FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2428 RULES AND REGULATIONS channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 1; thence sisting of (1) a sealed envelope contain to Canada, 10 cents for 5 ounces or less, to Ship Shoal Day beacon; thence to Cal ing a written or printed communication; 12 cents for 6 ounces, 14 cents for 7 casieu Channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 1; and (2) an unsealed container, with ounces, and 16 cents for 8 ounces. thence to Sabine Pass Lighted Whistle samples of merchandise or printed mat * * * * * Buoy I. ter enclosed. N ote: The corresponding Postal Manual 2. Section 82.106 is amended to read as (b) Rates. Each part of a combination section is 224.16a. follows: package must be fully prepaid at the appropriate rate of postage. III. In Part 168, Directory of Interna § 82.106 Sabine Pass, Tex., to Galveston, (c) Countries for which accepted. tional Mail, make the following changes: Tex. The following countries accept com § 168.1 [Am ended] A line drawn from Sabine Pass Lighted bination packages as ordinary (unreg istered) mail only, except as noted: A. In § 168.1 Postal Union mail, the Whistle Buoy 1 to Galveston Bay En following material is deleted from the trance Channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 1. Australia. Republic of Hondu chart under paragraph (a) Classifica 3. Section 82.111 is amended to read as Austria. ras (registered tions, surface rates and weight limits. follows: Bolivia. only). Brazil. Iceland. § 82.111 Galveston, Tex., to Brazos British Guiana. Weight Jamaica. Classification Surface Rates limits River, Tex. British Honduras. Mexico. (surface and air) (surface Bulgaria. Nicaragua. and air) A line drawn from Galveston Bay En Canada. Norway. trance Channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 1 Colombia. Panama. to Freeport Entrance Lighted Bell Denmark. Philippines. Ounces Buoy 1. Dominican Republic Poland. 8 ounce merchandise 8 (ordinary or regis Rumania. packages (see § 112.8 (Sec. 2, 28 Stat. 672, as amended; 33 U.S.C. tered) . El Salvador. of this chapter). 151. Treasury Department Order 120, July 4 cents first 2 Faroe Islands. Sweden. ounces, 2 cents 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 6521) Greenland. Turks Islands. - each additional Haiti. ounce; mini Dated: January 28,1966. mum charge 10 cents. [ seal] W. D. S h ield s, §112.9 Articles grouped together. To Chile, Cuba, 25 cents each Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Guatemala, (flat rate). Acting Commandant. (a) Grouping permitted. A single en Haiti, Paraguay, velope or package may contain commer and Pem. [F.R. Doc. 66-1288; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; cial papers, samples of merchandise, 8:46 a.m.] and/or printed matter subject to the § 168.5 [Am ended] following conditions: B. In § 168.5 Individual country regu (1) Each article taken singly must not lations, make the following changes: Title 39— POSTAL SERVICE exceed the limits of weight applicable to 1. In “Canada (including Newfound it. Chapter I— Post Office Department land and Labrador) ” make the following (2) The total weight must not exceed changes: PART 112— RATES AND CONDITIONS 4 pounds 6 ounces per package if it con a. Under Postal Union Mail, the ma FOR SPECIFIC CLASSES sists solely of commercial papers and terial under the item Surface rates, samples. classifications, weight limits, and dimen PART 114— TREATMENT OF INCOM (3) The weight limit is raised to 6 sions is revised to read: ING POSTAL UNION MAIL pounds 9 ounces if the package also con tains prints, but in such case the total Postal Union Mail PART 168— DIRECTORY OF weight of the commercial papers and Surface rates, classifications, weight INTERNATIONAL MAIL samples must not exceed 4 pounds 6 limits and dimensions. See § 168.1. For Discontinuance of 8-OuncexMerchan- ounces. packages of merchandise weighing up to dise Packages to Certain Countries (4) The dimensions of the package 8 ounces the surface rates are 10 cents must not exceed those of letters. for 5 ounces or less, 12 cents for 6 ounces, A notice of proposed revision in Parts FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 2429 2. In “ Cuba (including Isle of Pines* West Indies)” make the following Title 46— SHIPPING changes under Postal Union Mail: Chapter IV— Federal Maritime a. The material immediately preced Commission ing the item Surface rates, classifica tion, weight limits, and dimensions is SUBCHAPTER B— REGULATIONS AFFECTING revised to read: MARITIME CARRIERS AND RELATED ACTIVITIES (Letter packages are'limited to those [General Order 15; Docket No. 875] containing medicines.) b. The item Eight-ounce merchandise PART 533— FILING OF TARIFFS BY packages and its accompanying material TERMINAL OPERATORS is deleted. Notice of Postponement of Date for c. A new item Observations is added preceding the item Prohibitions to read: Compliance Observations. Senders must affix a Good cause appearing, the date for green customs label (Form 2976), show compliance with the provisions of this ing the contents and value, to all letter part is hereby postponed indefinitely packages. pending disposition of the petition to re 3. In the countries “ Chile,” “Guate view the Commission’s General Order 15 mala,” “Haiti,” “Paraguay,” and “Peru,” filed by the Alabama Great Southern under Postal Union Mail, the item Eight- Railroad Co. et al. in the United States ounce merchandise packages and its ac Court of Appeals, District of Columbia companying material is deleted. Circuit, in the Court’s Docket No. 19,798. (R.S. 161, as amended; 5 U.S.C. 22, 39 U.S.C. By the Commission. 501, 505) H arvey H. H a n na h , [ seal] T hom as L is i, Acting General Counsel. Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 66-1273; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; [F.R. Doc. 66-1277; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; 8:46 a.m.] 8:46 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 C ast, R olled, O rdinary, C olored, or .F ederal R egister, No hearing will be DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY S pecial G lass held. Bureau of Customs § 13.20 Ascertainment o f weight; cast, £ seal 3 L ester D. Jo hnso n, rolled, ordinary, colored, or special Commissioner of Customs. glass. [ 19 CFR Part 13 1 Approved: January 26, 1966. (a) The net weight of one case of CAST, ROLLED, ORDINARY, COLORED, each size and thickness in every invoice James P om eroy H endrick, OR SPECIAL GLASS DUTIABLE ON designated for examination shall be de Acting Assistant Secretary of WEIGHT BASIS termined by one of the appropriate meth the Treasury. ods described in the instructions below: [F.R. Doc. 66-1291; FUed, Feb. 4, 1966; Proposed Methods of Determining (1) To obtain the net weight of glass 8:46 a.m.] Weight in cases weighing not over 500 pounds each, weigh thè entire amount of glass Notice is hereby given that under the in the case, or obtain the gross weight authority of General Headnote 12, Tariff- of the case, remove and weigh all cover DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Schedules of the United States, it is pro ings and subtract the weight of the cov Consumer and Marketing Service posed to prescribe methods to be used erings from the gross weight. in determining the weight of cast, rolled, (2) To obtain the net weight of glass [ 7 CFR Parts 1097, 1102, 11081 ordinary, colored, or special glass de in cases weighing over 500 pounds, re [Docket Nos. AO-219-A16, AO-237-All, AO- fined in schedule 5, part 3B, headnote 2, move and weigh 20 or more sheets, ag 243—A13] Tariff Schedules of the United States, gregating not less than 100 square feet, which is dutiable on a weight basis un divide the weight so found by the total MILK IN MEMPHIS, TENN.; FORT der part 3B of schedule 5. area of the sheets weighed to obtain the SMITH, ARK.; AND CENTRAL AR Invoice net weights for shipments of weight in pounds per square foot, and KANSAS MARKETING AREAS such glass are generally based on aver multiply this by the total area of the ages as to thickness and weight per case sheets contained in the case. I f this is Notice of Recommended Decision and or box. Where such weights are within not practicable, caliper the edges of at Opportunity To File Written Excep the framework of acceptable tolerances least 5 sheets chosen from the case at tions on Proposed Amendments to of the weights as ascertained in accord random, using a micrometer caliper, if Tentative Marketing Agreements ance with the method specified in Treas available; multiply the average thickness ury Decision 49891, the invoice weight in inches by 13 to obtain the weight in and to Orders may be accepted in liquidation pounds per square foot; and multiply Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri It has come to the attention of the this by the total area of the sheets con cultural Marketing Agreement Act of Bureau, however, that the method speci tained in the case. (The calipering 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), fied in Treasury Decision 49891 is inade method, when used for glass weighing 28 and the applicable rules of practice and quate for glass weighing not over 28 ounces or less per square foot, is subject procedure governing the formulaton of ounces per square foot and packed in to significant inaccuracies, and its use marketing agreements and marketing cases over 500 pounds, because the thick with such glass should be avoided.) orders (7 CFR Part 900), notice is hereby ness of the glass may vary substantially (b) Where the test net weight as as given of the filing with the Hearing Clerk within each sheet and from sheet to certained in accordance with paragraph of this recommended decision with re sheet, in order to provide a more ac (a) of this section does not vary from the spect to proposed amendments to the curate basis and uniform procedure for invoice weight by more than 5 percent tentative marketing agreements and or determining the weight of glass defined the invoice weights of the glass of such ders regulating the handling of milk in in schedule 5, part 3B, headnote 2, size and thickness shall be accepted for the Memphis, Tenn.; Fort Smith, Ark.; Tariff Schedules of the United States, the purpose of computing duties. The and Central Arkansas marketing areas. it is proposed to incorporate in the regu test weight shall be used as a basis to Interested parties may file written excep lations prescribed methods for ascertain compute duties of the glass of such size tions to this decision with the Hearing ing the dutiable weight of such glass. and thickness, if it varies by more than Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, The proposed procedure would retail the 5 percent from the invoice weights. Washington, D.C., 20250, not later than method presently prescribed in Treasury (c) The method selected for determin 7 days after publication in the F ederal Decision 49891 for ascertaining the ing the test net weight, when needed, will R egister. The exceptions should be filed weight of glass imported in cases weigh be governed to a degree by the avail in quadruplicate.' All written submis ing not more than 500 pounds per case. ability of customs weighing facilities, sions made pursuant to this notice will A revised procedure is proposed for as weighing facilities provided by importers, be made available for public inspection certaining the weight of glass imported availability of personnel, and other con at the office of the Hearing Clerk, dunng in cases weighing over 500 pounds per siderations bearing directly upon the regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). case. Under the revised procedure the suitability of the method. However, ' Preliminary statement. The hearing actual weight in pounds per square foot when unusual conditions require a de on the record of which the propose of a representative sample of such glass parture from the above instructions, the amendments, as hereinafter set fort , is obtained and the total weight of the net weight shall be determined by the to the tentative marketing agreemen shipment determined by applying the method most appropriate to the cir and to the orders as amended, were for square-foot weight to the total area of cumstances. mulated, was conducted at MempW > Prior to the issuance of the proposed the shipment. Where it is not practi Tenn., on May 20-21, and in Little buck. amendment, consideration will be given cable to use this procedure, an altér Ark., on May 24-25, 1965, PurJslf.ntv , to any relevant data, views, or arguments notice thereof which was issued May » nate method is prescribed. which are submitted in writing to the The proposed regulations are set forth 1965 (30 F.R. 6534). , nf Commissioner o f Customs, Bureau of The material issues on the record o in tentative form below: Customs, Washington, D.C., 20226, and the hearing relate to: Part 13 is amended by adding a new received not later than 20 days from the A. Issues relating to Memphis, 7-e " centerhead and section as follows: date of publication of this notice in the and Central Arkansas orders: FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 2431 1. Class I prices under Memphis and 3. Definitions. A cooperative associaconflict, or that the change in one order Central Arkansas orders. tion may be a handler under the present would not interfere with the efficient B. Issues relating to only Memphis, order provisions with respect to milk movement of milk among the markets. Tenn., order: which it receives from member-producers Without coordinated changes in the 2. Qualifications for regulated plants. and delivers to the fluid milk plant of three orders there would be some possi 3. Definition of “handler”, “producer” , another handler in a bulk tank truck. bility of situations where a dairy farmer “approved plant” , “route disposition” , The cooperative is required to notify would not be able to maintain continu “fluid milk product” , and “ other source the market administrator and the han ous status as a producer under one order milk”. dler to whom the milk is delivered if it or another. 4. Plants subject to other Federal wishes to be the handler for such milk. The definition of fluid milk product orders. The order provision should be modified should be modified to exclude sterilized 5. Handler location differentials. to allow the cooperative association to cream packaged in hermetically sealed 6. Method of pooling. continue in the capacity of the handler containers not labeled as Grade A. This 7. Base rules and computation of uni for such milk from month-to-month exclusion of sterilized cream from the form base and excess prices. without notification each month to the definition of a fluid milk product will re C. Miscellaneous and conforminghandler and the market administrator. sult in classification as Class n milk changes, all three orders. A cooperative association wishing to be rather than Class I. Decisions have been issued dealing the handler on such basis should indi At least one handler regulated by the with Issue No. A 1 relating to Class I cate in its notification that it wishes to Memphis, Tenn., order distributes a prices under the Memphis and Central continue as a handler on such milk until product known as sterilized cream in a Arkansas orders. The amended Class further notification. A proposal was hermetically sealed container. The I price provisions were effective Decem made to require the market administra product is received and disposed of in the ber 15,1965 (30 F.R. 15463) in the Mem tor to approve a cooperative for handler same container. phis order and December 17, 1965 (30 status but it was not clear on what basis The sterilized cream received by the F.R. 15998) in the Central Arkansas or such approval should be made. Accord local handlers is manufactured in a proc der. This decision is concerned with the ingly, such proposal is denied. essing plant located in Gustine, Calif., remaining issues. The definition of “approved plant” approximately 2,050 miles from Mem Findings and conclusions. The fol should be deleted. This definition be phis,1 and thus incurs considerable trans lowing findings and conclusions on the comes unnecessary with minor changes portation cost. material issues are based on evidence in the definition of “handler” and re Official notice is taken of the decision presented at the hearing and the record porting provisions adopted herein. issued March 23, 1965, with respect to thereof: A partially regulated distributing plant proposed amendments to the St. Joseph, B. Issues relating only to Memphis,is defined among the types of nonfluid Mo., and Greater Kansas City marketing Tenn., order: milk plants. The operator of such plant orders (30 F.R. 3965) in which consid 2. Qualifications for regulated plants.should be included in the handler defi eration was given to sterilized cream in The definition of fluid milk plants and nition. This does not represent a change hermetically sealed containers manu nonfluid milk plants should be revised. in the scope of the order since the oper factured at the plant in Gustine, Calif. The Memphis order provides for regu ator of such a plant is presently a han It was found that the product was man lation of two types of plants: (1)A plant dler as the operator of an “ approved ufactured from cream of 40 percent but- distributing on routes in the marketing plant” . The handler definition shall terfat content purchased at about 80 area and (2) a plant shipping milk or also include the operator of a supply- cents per pound of butterfat and skim cream to the first type of plant. The lat type plant whether or not it qualifies as milk used to standardize to 30 percent ter, which may be termed a supply plant, a fluid milk plant. The market admin butterfat. The cost of cream at 80 cents qualifies for regulation on the basis of istrator should be authorized to require per pound of butterfat approximates the shipment of Grade A milk, skim milk reports from such plants to determine cost of its equivalent in cream of 30 or milk equivalent in the form of cream their status under the order. percent butterfat content computed at in excess of 70,000 pounds to a distribut No change is made in the definition of the average Class I price under the Mem ing plant if any of such shipments are “producer” . It was proposed that a dairy phis order during 1964. The manufac assigned to Class I. farmer should qualify as a producer un turer would incur besides this cost, the The definition of a supply plant should der the Memphis order only if he de cost of the purchase of skim milk. The be modified to specify that qualifying livered milk for eight or more days to a cost of the product at Memphis would in shipments of fluid milk products may be regulated plant under the Memphis clude also the transportation for the in either bulk or packaged form. The order. On the basis of every-other-day 2,050 miles. This product, therefore, term “fluid milk product” , as defined in delivery, as is common in this market, would have little if any competitive ad the order includes milk, skim milk and this requirement would ordinarily mean vantage compared to cream derived cream and other milk products which are that the majority of the producer’s milk from producer milk. Part of the normal supply for fluid dis was delivered to a Memphis order plant. Fluid milk products are intended to in tribution. Packaged fluid milk prod Some dairy farmers frequently have clude milk and milk products eligible for ucts may become an important source of producer status under the Memphis order disposition in a form for which Grade A supply for some plants now regulated and one of the other two orders on differ sources of milk are required. It is con by the order. At least one handler has ent days of the same month. It was not cluded that sterilized cream in hermet made arrangements under which he claimed, however, that such shifting re ically sealed containers and not labeled could receive either packaged or bulk sulted in burdening the Memphis market as Grade A should be excluded from the uuIk from another plant. Since the or- with reserve milk of other markets, or definition of fluid milk products. uer presently does not specify packaged that it impeded the marketing of milk The fluid milk product definition shipments to another plant as qualify of other Memphis producers. A coop should continue to exclude frozen cream. ing a source of supply, it might be pre erative association which supplies milk In this way, cream when stored as frozen sumed that only bulk shipments serve to handlers under the three orders ob cream will be a Class II use and will not *? Qualify the shipping plant. The order jected to such change. It was pointed again be subject to classification unless should properly provide for regulation out that some producer-members of this it is re-used in another product. In i such source of supply whether the association are shifted among the three this case, it would be reported as a re mpments are in bulk or are packaged markets and may be producers under all ceipt of other source milk. This proce three orders during any one month. The Hi f *??ln . FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25^-SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2432 PROPOSED RULE MAKING The definition of “other source milk” phis order handler operating a fluid milk ample, a plant with sales on routes in one should be modified herein for clarifica plant at Covington, Tenn., who has an marketing area sufficient only to qualify tion purposes by specifying that it is a affiliated plant at Fulton, Ky., which is a for regulation under the applicable order receipt at a fluid milk plant. pool plant under the Paducah Federal may have substantially more disposition A definition of “ route disposition” order, opposed the proposed change. He in transfers (bulk or packaged) to plants should be included in the Memphis order. argued that the 6-month provision under another order where such trans Although the order now uses the term should be retained under the Memphis fers are used in the fluid disposition, in “ route” in a number of provisions, there order. At the time of the hearing, this such a case the amount of the fluid milk is no definition of routes or route dispo handler was moving bulk milk from the products transferred to the plants under sition in the order. To make the order plant at Fulton to his fluid milk plant the other order should be* counted the language more specific it should include at Covington. Also, at times this han same as would be route disposition by a definition of “ route disposition” as dler has moved packaged fluid milk prod the transfer or plant in the second mar any delivery of a fluid milk product from ucts from the Covington plant to the Ful keting area. a plant to wholesale or retail outlets ton plant. He further indicated that 5. Handler location differentials, No (including any delivery by vendor, from packaged fluid milk products could be change should be made in the location a plant store, or through a vending ma moved from the Fulton plant to the Cov allowances to handlers. chine) other than a delivery to a milk ington plant to meet changing competi The only proposal to modify the loca plant. A delivery through a distribution tive conditions in his sales areas. This tion differential system for handlers was point should be attributed to the plant handler’s sales in the Paducah market by a handler whose plant is located ap from which the Class I milk is moved are of such nature that under the coop proximately 40 miles from the City Hall through the distribution point to whole erative’s proposal a small increase in in Memphis in the vicinity of Covington, sale or retail outlets, without intermedi sales to the Covington plant could result Tenn. Estimated mileage indicated that ate movement to another milk plant. in regulation of the Fulton plant under the distance might be somewhat less Such disposition through distribution the Memphis order. It was his conten than 40 miles. The handler proposed points is common in this market. An tion that a determination as to which that a location differential allowance of explicit definition of route disposition is order should regulate his plant based on not less than 7.5 cents per hundredweight particularly important in determination relative volumes of disposition in each apply at his plant. It was his position as to which plant shall be regulated marketing area creates a hardship on a that such allowance was necessary to under the order. handler with small plant operations such compensate for the cost of his moving 4. Plants subject to other orders. Theas his. finished products from his plant to the order provisions relating to a plant which In order that a plant selling milk in city of Memphis or points in Shelby qualifies as a “fluid milk plant” under two marketing areas shall not have undue County. The handler currently has the Memphis order and also as a fully competitive advantage, it is necessary sales in the northern part of Shelby regulated plant under another order that it be regulated under the order in County but has no disposition in the city should be revised. The Memphis order which it has the greatest proportion of of Memphis. Besides Tipton County should continue to regulate a plant until its Class I sales. When the larger pro where his plant is located his disposi the third consecutive month in which portion of a handler’s Class I sales shifts tion extends northward and eastward as its Class I disposition is greater under from one market to another the change far as Dyer, Gibson, Chester, and another order. in regulation should therefore be as soon McNairy Counties of Tennessee. The Mid-South Milk Producers Asso as possible. However, so as to give the Most of the handlers under the order ciation proposed that a plant qualifying handler reasonable notice of prospective are located in the city of Memphis. as a fully regulated plant under this and change in regulation and to allow him to Their distribution routes extend out over another order should be regulated under rearrange his business as he so desires, a wide area, however, and encompass the order applicable in the marketing he may be permitted to remain for a brief areas north and east of the city of Cov area where the plant disposed of the period under the regulation where he has ington including parts of Chester, Dyer, greater volume of Class I milk in bulk or the lesser part of his sales. The 6- Gibson, Madison, and McNairy Counties, packaged form to retail or wholesale month period now contained in the order Tennessee. It is clear that all of the outlets, including milk plants. is too long a period for a handler to be marketing area is adequately served by Under the present order provisions the allowed to operate under another order handlers under the present location dif determination as to whether this or an although his greater disposition is in ferential system. other order would regulate a plant de this market. Location differentials are intended to pends upon the relative volume of Class The provision adopted here is intended reflect the value of milk according to I milk disposed of from such plant dur to work in a manner complementary to location in relation to the primary mar ing the immediately preceding 6-month similar provisions in other orders. It ket. The value of the milk in the out period to retail or wholesale outlets (ex would provide that the Memphis order lying parts of the supply area is affected cept milk plants in the Memphis market would continue to regulate a plant until by the cost of transporting milk into the ing area) than in the other marketing the third consecutive month in which its primary consuming center. The wide area. The association proposal would Class I disposition was greater under distribution area of, handlers located make the determination on the basis of another order. In the third month the within Memphis as well as that of pro relative disposition in the two market Memphis order would relinquish regula ponent handler indicates that the market ing areas during only the current month. tion if the plant qualified as a fully regu itself is spread over a large part of tee Originally the 6-month basis for deter lated plant under the other order. supply area. Supply areas close to the mining which order should regulate a To avoid conflict between the Memphis center of the market accordingly lose plant was intended to stabilize the regu and any other order involved, however, it distinction as locations from which milk lation of one plant which had about equal should be provided that if in any event moves into a consuming center. Within sales in the Memphis and Central Ar the other order does not exempt the such area the basic reason for location kansas marketing areas. This situation plant because of its regulation under differentials diminishes. , no longer exists and there is no current this order, then the Memphis order will For plants located in such areas w problem with respect to a plant which yield the regulation to the other order. both supply and fluid disposition, the might shift between the two orders be This would apply in particular to a value of milk produced tends cause of temporary changes in disposi plant which continues under regulation or approach the value of milk deliver tion in one market or the other. under another order for 2 months under by farmers to plants in the most con The corresponding provision of the a similar provision while having its centrated areas of milk consumpto • Central Arkansas milk order was not greater disposition in the Memphis area. As population spreads throughout opened for consideration at this hear The determination as to which market supply area, plants formerly considerea ing. No objection, however, was made by a plant has the greater association may handlers or producer associations in the depend on shipment of milk (bulk or to be in outlying areas gain advantage Central Arkansas market to the change packaged) to plants or routes distribu in cost of moving milk for dispositio proposed in the Memphis order. A Mem- tion by the plant in question. For ex the fringe of the distribution FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 2433 Thus, the geographical area in which no producer would reflect the combined and producer milk. Such proration is location differentials would apply would milk deliveries and period in which such also used in the months when base and tend to enlarge rather than diminish; milk was delivered by the two producers. excess prices are computed. As a result, The question of whether this concentra This would be accomplished by comput the only Class I and Class H utilization tion should lead to any reduction of loca ing a new base as if all the milk had in the handler’s plant which is applied to tion differentials was not sufficiently ex been delivered by one producer. It was base and excess milk is that assigned to plored on this record to modify any of complained that under the present order base and excess milk delivered directly the existing location differentials. provisions a producer may gain advan from producers’ farms without the coop 6. Method of pooling. The method oftage, for base forming purposes, by a erative as an intermediary. Inasmuch as payment to producers in the Memphis change in the name in which the milk virtually all producer milk in the Mem market should not be changed from indi is delivered during the base forming phis market is delivered to fluid milk vidual-handler pools. months of September through January. plants by cooperative associations as Certain handlers requested a change This allows the earning of two bases the handlers, such assignment is of little or to marketwide pooling. This, it was sum of which is greater than if only one no effect. Monies prorated to the coop contended, would provide a more favor base were earned by delivery of the same erative association pursuant to § 1097.- able basis for handlers to procure milk quantity of milk by a single producer in 71(c) become part of the total returns for Class I and reserve milk supply and the same total period. Similarly, two which the cooperative association as a overcome alleged efforts by cooperative bases could be earned on the same farm handler may assign to the base and associations intended to maintain a short due to change in ownership, the total of excess milk of its members for payment supply. which would be greater than a single purposes. , Producer representatives, on the other base computed from all deliveries from Under this treatment, it is possible hand, opposed the change to a market the same farm. that if milk were delivered by producers pool on the basis that such change could The effect of such earning of dual without base, or such milk were delivered not produce any benefits for producers. bases is contrary to the intent of the by a cooperative association as a handler, Procurement of additional milk sup base-excess plan. The purpose of the it would be assigned the same average plies for this market would be consistent base plan is to prorate returns to pro value per hundredweight as is accorded with the objective of an adequate milk ducers during the base paying period in to base milk delivered by a cooperative supply, since this market has been de a manner which reflects their individual association. pendent in recent years partially on out deliveries during the base forming A modification in the method of pay side sources. It was not shown, however, period, and thus provide incentive to ment in the manner proposed by the that there are additional supplies avail achieve even production throughout the cooperative would tend to more fully able within the present production area year. However, the earning of multiple implement the purpose of the base plan. such that could change the market sub bases in the manner described tends to It would provide payment to the cooper stantially from its present situation of result in bases for some producers which ative association commensurate with the short supply. In answer to handlers’ are greater in proportion to the average base milk delivered so that it could com contention that there are supplies which daily deliveries from which such bases pensate its members accordingly. the principal cooperative association are computed than in the case of other There are few plants at which there holds off the market, the association producers. To achieve the intent of the is received milk of producers other than stated that only about two percent of base plan, it is necessary to provide a that delivered by a single cooperative as member milk was not reported in 1964. uniform method of computing base for sociation as a bulk tank handler. For This milk was disposed of to manufac each producer. this reason, the necessary reporting by turing plants because it was not needed A new base should be computed in any the cooperative association of the by fluid milk plants. The supposition instance where a base is transferred to amount of base milk and excess milk that there is a surplus of production in a producer who already has a base. of each member delivered to a particular the present supply area which could be This should be done by adding together plant should be at the discretion of the attached to the market was not sup milk deliveries from which both bases market administrator. The order pro ported. On the contrary, handlers ex were computed and dividing this total visions for computation of payments for pect difficulty in procuring milk in the quantity by the number of days of de base and excess milk are revised to make supply area except at blend prices as high livery from the day of first delivery by payments to the cooperative association as those paid by other handlers or the either producer to the last day of such on the basis of the base and excess milk cooperative association. base forming period, but not less than of its members delivered to fluid milk There is ordinarily only a small quan 120 days. plants. tity of reserve milk on the market and A portion of a jointly held base should The Food and Agricultural Act of 1965 such reserve is handled by the coopera be transferable in the same manner as provides that any base plan shall not be tive association. Thus, there is no show an entire base. However, transfers of come effective in any marketing order ing of existence of a burdensome surplus partial bases should be limited to those unless separately approved by producers or prospect of surplus, or that reserve occasions where the entire base is dis in a referendum in which each individual supplies are inequitably distributed posed of by all joint holders. This will producer has one vote. This Act further among groups of producers. Cooperative inhibit temporary shifts of partial bases provides that disapproval of such order associations in the market did not com which would interfere with the uniform provisions shall not be considered disap plain of inequitable sharing of reserve application of the base plan. In the proval of the order or other terms of the or request a market pool. case of a producer who already has a order. Accordingly, the base and excess In view of the foregoing considéra base and acquires, in addition, a portion provisions of this order are herein listed n t * ’ ^ *s concluded that marketwide of a jointly held base, a new base would separately and will be subject to the ma k t Sk°u^ no^ ^ adopted in this be computed which would reflect a pro separate voting procedure in a referen portionate share of the milk deliveries, dum as provided in such Act. ha!’ B2se an^ excess payments. A n ew and all of the days of delivery, from C. Miscellaneous, all three orders: No. 25- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2434 PROPOSED RULE MAKING requirements have not resulted in serious in the record does not support the pro or from a distribution point and distri problems to the extent that the final date posed changes. bution by a vendor or vending machine) for delivery would need to be advanced General findings. The findings and of any fluid milk products to a retail or one day as proposed. determinations hereinafter set forth are wholesale outlet other than a delivery H ie reporting provisions should be supplementary and in addition to the to a milk plant. A delivery through a modified to conform to the deletion of findings and determinations previously distribution point shall be attributed to the approved plant definition and the made in connection with the issuance the plant from which the Class I milk is corresponding changes in the definition of the aforesaid order and of the pre moved through a distribution point to of handlers. The reporting requirements viously issued amendments thereto and wholesale or retail outlets, without inter for a partially regulated distributing all of said previous findings and deter mediate movement to another milk plant. plant currently appearing in §§ 1097.30 minations are hereby ratified and 3. In § 1097.9 the introductoiy para FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 2435 § 1097.16 Fluid milk product. quirements for fully regulated plants un § 1097.22 Duties. “Fluid milk product” means the fluid der another Federal order and from * ■r * * it * which the market administrator deter form of milk, skim milk, buttermilk, (1) * * ♦ plain or flavored milk drinks, sweet and mines a greater volume of fluid milk (2) * * * or 1097.72, as applicable sour cream (except aerated cream, frozen products is disposed of during the month ♦ * * as Class I route disposition in the Mem cream, and sterilized cream packaged in * * ♦ phis, Tenn., marketing area and as fluid * ♦ hermetically sealed containers not la § 1097.31 Other reports. beled as Grade A ) ; and any mixture in milk products transferred as Class I milk if * * ♦ * fluid form of milk, skim milk, and cream to other fluid milk plants than as Class except mixes for frozen dairy products. I route disposition in the other market (b) * * if Eggnog and sour cream mixtures to ing area and fluid milk products trans (3) * * *, and the base milk and ex- which cheese or any food substance other ferred as Class I milk to plants fully cess milk of each producer-mpmber re than a milk product has been added shall regulated by such other order, and such ceived by a cooperative association in be considered as fluid milk products only other order which fully regulates the its capacity as a handler pursuant to if disposed of under a Grade A label. plant does not contain provision to J 1097.10(c); exempt the plant from regulation under 7. In § 1097.42, paragraph (b) (1) isthe particular circumstances described * i t * * i * revise to read as follows: herein of having greater Class I disposi § 1097.72 Computation of the uniform § 1097.42 Shrinkage. tion under the Memphis, Tenn., order. prices for base and excess milk for * * * * * 9. In § 1097.70, paragraph (e) is re handlers. (b) For each handler prorate the revised to read as follows: For each of the months of March sulting respective amounts between: § 1097.70 Net obligations of handlers. through July the market administrator shall compute for each handler with re (1) The pounds of skim milk and but- * * * * * terfat in other source milk received in spect to his producer milk a uniform the form of bulk fluid milk products ex (e) Add the amount obtained fromprice for base milk and for excess milk clusive of that specified in § 1097.41(b) multiplying the difference between the as follows: (5); and Class I I price for the preceding month (a) Following the computations and and the Class I price for the current adjustments provided for in § 1097.71 (a ), month by the lesser of: (b ), and ( d ) ; 8. Section 1097.61 is revised to read as (1) The pounds of skim milk and but follows: (b) Compute the value of excess milk terfat subtracted from Class I pursuant received by such handler as producer § 1097.61 Plants subject to other Fed to § 1097.46(a) (5) and the corresponding milk and bulk milk from a cooperative eral orders. step of (b ); or association in its capacity as a handler In the case of a handler in his capacity (2) The pounds of skim milk and but pursuant to § 1097.10(c), by multiplying as operator of a plant specified in para terfat remaining in Class I I (exclusive the quantity of such milk not in excess graph (a) or (b) of this section, the pro of shrinkage) after computations pur of the total quantity of Class n milk for visions of this part shall not apply except suant to § 1097.46(a) (7) (i) and the cor such handler pursuant to § 1097.70(a) by that such handler shall with respect to responding step of (b) for the preceding the Class I I price; multiply the remaining his total receipts and disposition of skim month. excess milk by the Class I price, and add milk and butterfat, make reports to the * * * * * together the resulting amounts; market administrator at such time and 10. In § 1097.71, the introductory text (c) Divide the total value of excess in such manner as the market adminis is revised to read as follows: milk obtained in paragraph (b) of this trator may prescribe and allow verifica section by the total hundredweight of tion of such reports by the market ad § 1097.71 C o m p u t a tio n o f uniform such excess milk and adjust to the near ministrator: prices for handlers. est cent. The resulting figure shall be (a) A plant qualified pursuant to In any month when the base and excess the uniform price for such handler for all § 1097.7 (a) or (b) which would be fully prices do not apply, the market adminis excess milk of 3.5 percent butterfat regulated pursuant to the provisions of trator shall compute for each handler a content; another order issued pursuarit to the Act uniform price with respect to his pro (d) Subtract, for each handler, the and from which the market administra ducer milk as follows: value of such handler’s excess milk ob tor determines that a greater volume of * * * * * tained in paragraph (b) of this section fluid milk products was disposed of dur- from the value of all milk obtained for mg the month from such plant as Class Base-excess plan. 11. The provisions such handler pursuant to paragraph (a) I route disposition in the marketing area relating to the base-excess plan are set of this section; and regulated by the other order and as fluid forth below. Only the language appli (e) Divide the amount obtained in milk products transferred as Class I milk cable to the base-excess plan contained paragraph (d) of this section by the total to plants fully regulated by such other in §§ 1097.22(i)(2), 1097.91(b), and hundredweight of base milk received by order than as Class I route disposition 1097.94(b) is included in the following such handler. The result, less any frac m the Memphis, Tenn., marketing area provisions. The base-excess plan pro tion of a cent per hundredweight, shall and as fluid milk products transferred as visions which are being modified by this be the uniform price for such handler for uass I milk to other fluid milk plants: decision are §§ 1097.31(b) (3), 1097.72, base milk of 3.5 percent butterfat con rowded, That a plant which was a fluid and 1097.82. tent subject to adjustments pursuant to im!r Pl ^ t pursuant to § 1097.7 (a) or (b) § 1097.17 Base milk. § 1097.93. this order in the immediately pre- “ Base milk” means milk received by a D etermination op B ase J r j? month shall continue to be sub- handler from a producer during any of . a^ of the provisions of this part § 1097.80 Computation of daily average the months of March through July, base for each producer. wVu,t h i r d consecutive month in which is not in excess of such producer’s ? greater Proportion of fluid milk base computed pursuant to § 1097.81. The daily average base for each pro products is disposed of as Class I milk ducer shall be determined by the market nr U i s *n such other marketing area § 1097.18 Excess milk. administrator as folows: Divide the total nrrw p ,ts fully subject to such other “Excess milk” means milk received by pounds of milk received from such pro rf_ i> the other order requires a handler from a producer during any of ducer by handlers fully regulated under to . ati°n of the plant without regard the months of March through July, the terms of the respective orders regu for ro„T?aHfy in g 8 5 a flu ld milk plant which is in excess of the base milk of lating the handling of milk in the Mem totting •10n under this order subject such producer for such month, and shall phis, Tenn.; Fort Smith, Ark.; and Cen (hi P.rovif° °t this paragraph; and include all milk from a producer for tral Arkansas marketing areas (this Part § 1007 7 ( *rant Qualified pursuant to whom no base can be computed pursuant 1097 and Parts 1102 and 1108, respective • (a) or (b) which meets the re to § 1097.81 ly, of this chapter) during the immedi- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2436 PROPOSED RULE MAKING ately preceding period of September eries during the period of September throifgh January, by the total number of through January of all persons in whose FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY days in such period beginning with names such bases were earned and divid the first day on which milk is received ing the total by the total number of days I 14 CFR Part 71 1 from such producer by a handler reg in such period beginning with the first [Airspace Docket No. 65-CE-139] ulated under any one of the aforesaid day on which milk was received during orders, but not less than 120. In the case the months of September through Jan FEDERAL AIRWAYS of producers delivering milk to a han uary from any of such persons but not Proposed Alteration dler’s plant which first became a fluid less than 120 days. milk plant during or after the end of the The Federal Aviation. Agency is con base-forming period, the daily average § 1097.83 Announcement o f established bases. sidering amendments to Part 71 of the base for each producer shall be that Federal Aviation Regulations that would which would have been calculated for On or before February 25 of each year, designate floors on segments of Federal such producer for the entire base-form the market administrator shall notify airways in the Indianapolis Air Route ing period if the handler’s plant had been each producer of the daily average base Traffic Control Center area. a fluid milk plant during such period. established by such producer. Interested persons may participate in the proposed rule making by submitting § 1097.81 Determination o f monthly § 1097.91 Payments to producers. such written data, views, or arguments base of each producer. ♦ * * ' * * as they may desire. Communications Subject to the rules set forth in (b) * * * or 1097.72, as applicashould identify the airspace docket num § 1097.82, the market administrator shall ble * * * ber and be submitted in triplicate to the calculate a monthly base for each pro * * * * * Director, Central Region, Attention: ducer for each of the months of March § 1097.94 Statement to producers. Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avia through July, as follows: * * * * * tion Agency, 4825 Troost Avenue, Kan (a) I f milk is received by a handler sas City, Mo., 64110. All communica as producer milk during the month, mul (b) * * *, including for the months tions received within 45 days after pub of March through July, such producer’s tiply such producer’s daily average base lication of this notifce in the Federal deliveries of base and excess milk; computed pursuant to § 1097.80 by the R egister will be considered before action number of days in such month; ♦ ♦ * * * is taken on the proposed amendments. (b) I f milk is received as producer Signed at Washington, D.C., on Feb The proposal contained in this notice milk from the same farm by more than ruary 1, 1966. may be changed in the light of comments one handler and/or by handlers fully received. regulated under the terms of the Central C larence H. G irard, Deputy Administrator, An official docket will be available for Arkansas (Part 1108 of this chapter) or examination by interested persons at the Regulatory Programs. Fort Smith, Ark. (Part 1102 of this Federal Aviation Agency, Office of the chapter), orders during the month, mul [F.R. Doc. 66-1253; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; General Counsel, Attention: Rules Dock tiply such producer’s daily average base 8:45 a.m.] et, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Wash computed pursuant to §1097.80 by the ington, D.C., 20553. An informal docket number of days in such month and mul also will be available for examination at tiply the result by the percentages of the the office of the Regional Air Traffic Divi total pounds of milk received from such DEPARTMENT OF LABOR sion Chief. producer by handlers fully regulated Office of the Secretary The Federal Aviation Agency proposes under the terms of the three orders spec to designate floors on the pertinent air ified in § 1097.80 which were received [ 29 CFR Part 60 1 way segments as hereinafter set forth: by each handler to determine the amount ALIENS SEEKING TO ENTER UNITED 1. V-4 From Evansville, Ind., 1,200 feet of base milk received from such producer AGL via INT Evansville 080° and Louisville, by each handler. STATES FOR PURPOSE OF PER Ky., 269“ True radials; Including a 1,200 feet FORMING LABOR AGL N alternate. § 1097.82 Base rules. 2. V—6 From South Bend, Ind., 1,200 feet ^ The following rules shall apply in con Notice of Proposed Rule Making AGL via INT South Bend 092 “ and Waterville, Ohio, 288“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL nection with the establishment of bases Pursuant to section 212(a) (14) of the for each producer computed pursuant to Waterville. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 3. V-7 From Central City, Ky., 1,200 feet § 1097.80: as amended by Public Law 89-236,1 here AGL Evansville, Ind. (a) An entire base or share of a jointby propose to amend 29 CFR Part 60 (30 4. V—8 From Goshen, Ind., 1,200 feet AGL holder shall be transferred from a person FJt. 14494, 14979) by adding the follow Findlay, Ohio. holding such base to another person as ing material to Schedule A thereof: 5. V -ll From Paducah, Ky., 1200 feet of the end of the month during which AGL via INT Paducah 039“ and EvansviUe, an application for the transfer of such Group IV: Persons coming to the United Ind., 227“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL States solely to perform duties related to base is received by the market adminis Evansville. nonprofit organizations exclusively within a 6. V—12 From Shelbyville, Ind., 1,200 feet trator, such application to be on forms religious denomination of which they are AGL via Richmond, Ind.; 1,200 feet AGL Day- approved by the market administrator members pursuant to an assignment by that ton, Ohio. .. and signed by the base holder(s) or by denomination having a bona fide organiza 7. V—30 From Litchfield, Mich., 1,200 feet the heirs and by the person to whom such tion in the United States. AGL Watèrville, Ohio. . 8. V—38 From Fort Wayne, Ind., 1,200 ieei base is to be transferred subject to the Any person interested in this proposal following conditions: AGL Findlay, Ohio. . may file a written statement of data, 9. v —44 From Samsville, HI., 1,200 fee* (1) I f a base is held jointly and such views, or argument regarding it with the joint holding is terminated, the entire AGL via Nabb, Ind.; 1,200 feet AGL Fal Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of mouth, Ky. „ A base may be transferred to one of the Labor, Washington, D.C., 20210, within 10. V—47 From Evansville, Ind., 1,200 ieei joint holders; 10 days after this notice is published in AGL via INT Evansville 065“ and Nabb, ino, (2) The share of a joint base holder 252“ True radials; 1,200- feet AGL Nabb; 12 the F ederal R egister. may be transferred to a person other feet AGL Cincinnati, Ohio; 1,200 feet A than a joint holder of the base only if (79 stat. 911) Rosewood, Ohio, including a 1260 W alternate from Cincinnati to INT D y* all shares of the entire base are at the Signed at Washington, D.C., tills 2d same time transferred to the same or Ohio, Municipal Airport ILS localizer day of February 1966. course and Rosewood 202“ True r^ r/*+on other persons; and INT Cincinnati 006“ True radial aadDayx (3) If one or more bases are trans W . W illard W irtz, Municipal Airport ILS localizer SW c • ferred to a producer already holding a Secretary of Labor. 11. V—49 From Bowling Green, Kf., base, a new base shall be computed by [F.R. Doc. 66-1276; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; feet AGL via Mystic, Ky.; 1200 feet A adding together the total eligible deliv 8:46 am.] Nabb, Ind. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 2437 12 V-51 From Louisville, Ky., 1,200 feet Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avi 10. V-38 From Parkersburg, W. Va., 1,200 AGL via Nabb, Ind.; 1,200 feet AGL Shelby- ation Agency, Federal Building, John F. feet AGL Elkins, W. Va. ville, Ind. 11. V-39 From South Boston, Va., 1,200 Kennedy International Airport, Jamaica, feet AGL via Gordonsville, Va.; 1,200 feet 13. V-53 From Louisville, Ky., 1,200 feet N.Y., 11430. All communications re AGL via INT Louisville 333° and Indianapolis, AGL INT Gordonsville 019“ and Casanova, Ind., 170° True .radials; 1,200 feet AGL ceived within 45 days after publication of Va., 201“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Casa Indianapolis. this notice in the F ederal R egister will nova; 1,200 feet AGL Herndon, Va., includ 14. V-90 From Litchfield, Mich., 1,200 feet be considered before action is taken on ing a 1,200 feet AGL E alternate from Gor AGL via INT Litchfield 081° and Windsor, the proposed amendment. The proposal donsville to Herndon via INT Herndon 202“ Ont., Canada, 265° True radials; 1,200 feet contained in this notice may be changed and Brooke, Va., 300° True radials; 1,200 feet AGL to the international border. in the light of comments received. AGL Westminster, Md.; 1,200 feet AGL Lan 15. V-92 From Goshen, Ind., 1,200 feet An official docket will be available for caster, Pa. AGL to Waterville, Ohio. 12. V—44 From Morgantown, W. Va., 1,200 16. V-96 From Fort Wayne, Ind., 1,200 examination by interested persons at the feet AGL via Martinsburg, W. Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Waterville, Ohio. Federal Aviation Agency, Office of the feet AGL Baltimore, Md.; 1,200 feet AGL INT 17. V-97 From Cincinnati, Ohio, 1,200 feet General Counsel, Attention: Rules Baltimore 094“ and Kenton, Del., 262° Triie AGL Shelbyville, Ind. Docket, 800 Independence Avenue SW., radials; 1,200 feet AGL Kenton. 18. V-126 From Goshen, Ind., 1,200 feet Washington, D.C., 20553. An informal 13. V—92 From Grantsville, Md., 1,200 feet AGL Waterville, Ohio. docket also will be available for exam AGL Front Royal, Va. 19. V-128 From Indianapolis, Ind., 1,200 ination at the Office of the Regional Air 14. V-93 From Patuxent River, Md., 1,200 feet AGL via INT Indianapolis 137* and feet AGL via INT Patuxent River 013“ and Cincinnati, Ohio, 290° True radials; 1,200 feet Traffic Division Chief. Baltimore, Md., 122“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Cincinnati. The Federal Aviation Agency proposes AGL Baltimore; 1,200 feet AGL Lancaster, 20. V-144 From Fort Wayne, Ind., 1,200 to redesignate floors on the pertinent air Pa. feet AGL Findlay, Ohio. way segments as hereinafter set forth: 15. V-103 From Greensboro,' N.C., 1,200 21. V-171 From Louisville, Ky., 1,200 feet feet AGL via Roanoke, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL AGL Scotland, Ind. 1. V -l From Cofleld, N.C., 1,200 feet AGL Elkins, W. Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Clarksburg, 22. V-214 From Richmond, Ind., 1,200 feet via Norfolk, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Cape Charles, W. Va. AGL INT Richmond 090° and Rosewood, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL INT Cape Charles 015° 16. V—123 From Washington, D.C., 1,200 Ohio, 202“ True radials. and. Salisbury, Md., .206“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL via INT Baltimore, Md., 223° and 23. V-243 From Bowling Green, Ky., 1,200 feet AGL Salisbury. Kenton; Del., 262“ True radials; 1,200 feet feet AGL Scotland, Ind. 2. V—3 From Raleigh, N.C., 1,200 feet AGL AGL INT Kenton 262° and Woodstown, N.J., 24. V-275 From Cincinnati, Ohio, 1,200 via INT Raleigh 016“ and Flat Rock, Va., 214“ 230° True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Woodstown. feet AGL via INT Cincinnati 006° and Day- True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Flat Rock; 1,200 17. V—136 From Pulaski, Va., 1,200 feet ton, Ohio, 207* True radials; 1,200 feet AGL feet AGL Brooke, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL,_ 6 mi. AGL via INT Pulaski 094“ and South Boston, Dayton, including a 1,200 feet AGL W alter wide INT Brooke 014“ and Westminster, Md., Va., 295“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL South nate from Cincinnati to Dayton via INT, 195° True radials; 1,200 feet AGL West Boston. Cincinnati 336“ and Richmond, Ind., 190“ minster; 1,200 feet AGL INT Westminster 18. V-139 From Cape Charles, Va., 1,200 True radials and Richmond. 065“ and West Chester, Pa., 250“ True ra feet AGL Snow Hill, Md. 25. V-422 From Wolflake, Ind., 1,200 feet dials; 1,200 feet AGL West Chester. 19. V—140 From Bluefield, W. Va., 1,200 AGL via INT Wolflake 096“ and Findlay, 3. V-4 From Charleston, W. Va., 1,200 feet AGL via Clifdale, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Ohio, 289“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL feet AGL via Elkins, W. Va., including a Montebello, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Casanova, Findlay. 1.200 feet AGL S alternate via INT Charles Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Herndon, Va.; 1,200 feet ton 083° and Elkins 228° True radials; 1,200 AGL INT Herndon 061“ and West Chester, Floors of 1,200 feet AGL are proposed feet AGL Kessel, W. Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Pa., 234“ TYue radials; 1,200 feet AGL West for the airway segments considered here Front Royal, Va.; 1,200 feet'AGL Herndon, Chester. in as the greater portion thereof are Va. 20. V—143 From Greensboro, N.C., 1,200 within transition areas with 1,200 feet 4. V-8 From Indian Head, Pa., 1,200 feet feet AGL via Lynchburg, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL AGLfloors. AGL via Martinsburg, W. Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Montebello, Va. INT Herndon, Va., 048“ and Washington, 21. V—144 From Morgantown, W. Va., These amendments are proposed under D.C., 324“ True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Wash the authority of section 307(a) of the 1.200 feet AGL Kessel, W. Va.; 1,200 feet ington, including a 1,200 feet AGL N alter AGL Linden, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL INT Linden Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. nate from INT Martinsburg 297“ and Grants- 1348). 104“ and Herndon, Va., 185“ True radials. ville, Md., 086° True radials via Hagerstown, 22. V -l56 From Lawrenceville, Va., 1,200 Issued in Washington, D.C., on Jan Md., to INT Washington 324“ and Herndon feet AGL via INT Lawrenceville 034“ and uary 27,1966. 048“ True radials. Flat Rock, Va., 171“ True radials; 1,200 feet 5. V—16 From Pulaski, Va., 1,200 feet AGL Flat Rock; 1,200 feet AGL Gordonsville, James L. L am pl, AGL via Roanoke, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL INT Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Linden, Va.; 1,200 feet Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations Montebello, Va., 180“ and Gordonsville, Va., AGL Front Royal, Va. The airspace within and Procedures Division. 247* True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Gordons R-6602 is excluded. [F.R. Doo. 66-1257; Filed, Feb. 4, 1966; ville, including a 1,200 feet AGL N alternate 23. V-156 From Elkins, W. Va., 1,200 feet from Roanoke to Gordonsville via INT Ro 8:45 a.m.] AGL via Gordonsville, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL anoke 0355- and Montbello 250° True radials, Richmond, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Harcum, Va.; and Montebello; 1,200 feet AGL Nottingham, 1.200 feet AGL Cape Charles, Va. Md.; 1,200 feet AGL, 6 miles wide Kenton, I 14 CFR Part 71 ] 24. V—157 From Lawrenceville, Va., 1,200 Del. fee* AGL via Richmond, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL I Airspace Docket No. 65-EA-96] 6. V-20 From South Boston, Va., 1,200 Washington, D.C. (6 miles wide from INT feet AGL via Richmond, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL Brooke, Va.,'132“ and Washington 189* True FEDERAL AIRWAYS INT Richmond 039° and Brooke, Va., 131“ radials to Washington); 1,200 feet AGL Bal True radials. Proposed Alteration timore, Md.; 1,200 feet AGL INT Baltimore 7. V-31 From INT Patuxent River, Md., 038“ and New Castle, Del., 261“ True radials; . ?'k.e Federal Aviation Agency is con- 036“ and Nottingham, Md., 128“ True ra 1.200 feet AGL New Castle. dials; 1,200 feet AGL Nottingham. From sioenng amendments to Part 71 of the 25. V—162 From INT Clarksburg, W. Va., Baltimore, Md., 1,200 feet AGL Harrisburg, 135“ and Elkins, W. Va., 092“ True radials; rn FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 25— SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1966 2438 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 28. V-189 Prom Rocky Mount, N.C., 1,200 AGL Baltimore, Md.; 1,200 feet AGL INT feet AGL via Franklin, Va., 1,200 feet AGL Baltimore 094° and Kenton, Del., 262° True Hopewell, Va. radials; 1,200 feet AGL Kenton. The portion FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 29. V—194 From Cofleld, N.C., 1,200 feet within R-4001 is excluded. AGL via Norfolk, Va., including a 1,200 feet 39. V-286 From Linden, Va., 1,200 feet COMMISSION AGL S alternate via INT Cofleld 084° and AGL via Casanova, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL INT Norfolk 209° True radiale; 1,200 feet AGL Herndon, Va., 202° and Brooke, Va., 300° [ 47 CFR Part 73 1 INT Norfolk 001° and Cape Charles, Va., 313° True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Brooke; 1,200 [Docket No. 16370] True radials. feet AGL Cape Charles, Va. 30. V—213 From Rocky Mount, N.C., 1,200 40. V-290 From Rainelle, W. Va., 1,200 MINIMUM POWER AUTHORIZED FOR feet AGL via Hopewell, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL feet AGL via Montebello, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL INT Hopewell 019° and Brooke, Va., 131° Flat Rock, Va. From Franklin, Va., 1,200 CLASS IV RADIO STATIONS True radials; 1,200 feet AGL Patuxent River, feet AGL Elizabeth City, N.C. Md. 41. V-308 From INT Linden, Va., 273° Order Extending Time for Filing , 31. V—222 From Hickory, N.C., 1,200 feet and Casanova, Va., 284° True radials; 1,200 Reply Comments AGL Via Lynchburg, Va.; 1,200 feet AGL feet AGL via Casanova; 1,200 feet AGL INT Gordonsville, Va. Casanova 076° and Nottingham, Md., 271° 1. In a notice of propo