DOCSLIB.ORG

NI 43-101 Technical Report of the Rovina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NI 43-101 Technical Report of the Rovina NI 43 -101 Technical Report of the Rovina Exploration Property South Apuseni Mountains, West-Central Romania 23 April 2010 Prepared By: In Collaboration With: CARPATHIAN GOLD INC. PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT - NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT ROVINA VALLEY PROJECT, SOUTH APUSENI MOUNTAINS, WEST-CENTRAL ROMANIA Contents 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 1‐3 1.2 Resource Statement ............................................................................................................ 1‐5 1.3 Geotechnical ....................................................................................................................... 1‐6 1.4 Mining ................................................................................................................................. 1‐7 1.4.1 Open Pit Mining .................................................................................................. 1‐8 1.4.2 Underground Mining .......................................................................................... 1‐9 1.5 Metallurgy and Processing ................................................................................................ 1‐10 1.5.1 Metallurgy ......................................................................................................... 1‐10 1.5.2 Processing ......................................................................................................... 1‐11 1.6 Transportation and Logistics ............................................................................................. 1‐12 1.7 Infrastructure and Site Layout .......................................................................................... 1‐12 1.8 Capital and Operating Costs .............................................................................................. 1‐12 1.9 Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................. 1‐14 1.10 Markets and Smelter ......................................................................................................... 1‐17 1.11 Environmental and Socioeconomics ................................................................................. 1‐17 2 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ................................................................ 2‐1 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ..................................................................................... 3‐1 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ..................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 Location ............................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.2 Property and Title in Romania ............................................................................................ 4‐1 4.3 Land Tenure ........................................................................................................................ 4‐4 4.3.1 General................................................................................................................ 4‐4 4.3.2 Agreements ......................................................................................................... 4‐4 4.3.3 Surface Rights ..................................................................................................... 4‐5 4.3.4 Permits ................................................................................................................ 4‐5 5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................ 5‐1 5.1 Accessibility ......................................................................................................................... 5‐1 5.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 5‐1 5.3 Local Resources and Infrastructure..................................................................................... 5‐2 5.4 Physiography, Flora, and Fauna .......................................................................................... 5‐2 6 HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 6‐1 7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING .................................................................................................. 7‐1 7.1 Regional Geologic and Metallogenic Settings ..................................................................... 7‐1 7.2 Rovina Property Geology .................................................................................................... 7‐2 TOC | i 21/05/2010 CARPATHIAN GOLD INC. PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT - NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT ROVINA VALLEY PROJECT, SOUTH APUSENI MOUNTAINS, WEST-CENTRAL ROMANIA 7.2.1 Colnic–Rovina‐Ciresata Area ............................................................................... 7‐2 7.2.2 Rovina Deposit Geology ...................................................................................... 7‐5 7.2.3 Colnic Deposit Geology ....................................................................................... 7‐7 7.2.4 Ciresata Deposit Geology .................................................................................... 7‐9 8 DEPOSIT TYPES ............................................................................................................. 8‐1 9 MINERALIZATION ......................................................................................................... 9‐1 9.1 Rovina Deposit Mineralization ............................................................................................ 9‐1 9.2 Colnic Deposit Mineralization ............................................................................................. 9‐2 9.3 Ciresata Deposit Mineralization .......................................................................................... 9‐2 10 EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................ 10‐1 10.1 Coordinates and Datum .................................................................................................... 10‐1 10.2 Topography ....................................................................................................................... 10‐1 10.3 Geological Mapping and Related Studies ......................................................................... 10‐1 10.4 Remote Sensing and Satellite Imagery .............................................................................. 10‐2 10.5 Geophysics ........................................................................................................................ 10‐2 10.6 Geochemistry .................................................................................................................... 10‐3 10.6.1 Stream Sediment Sampling ............................................................................... 10‐3 10.6.2 Soil Geochemical Sampling ............................................................................... 10‐3 10.6.3 Rock Chip Sampling ........................................................................................... 10‐3 10.6.4 Mineralogical and Petrographic Studies ........................................................... 10‐4 11 DRILLING .................................................................................................................... 11‐1 11.1 Historical Minexfor Drilling ............................................................................................... 11‐2 11.1.1 Rovina Deposit .................................................................................................. 11‐2 11.1.2 Colnic Deposit ................................................................................................... 11‐2 11.1.3 Ciresata Prospect .............................................................................................. 11‐2 11.2 Carpathian Drilling ............................................................................................................ 11‐2 11.3 Carpathian Downhole Surveys .......................................................................................... 11‐3 11.4 Carpathian Dry Bulk Density Measurements .................................................................... 11‐3 12 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH ........................................................................ 12‐1 12.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 12‐1 12.2 Soil Sampling Procedures .................................................................................................. 12‐1 12.3 Channel Chip Sampling Procedures .................................................................................. 12‐1 12.3.1 Core Sampling Procedures ................................................................................ 12‐2 13 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY .................................................... 13‐1 13.1 Sample Preparation for Soil Samples ................................................................................ 13‐1 13.2 Sample Preparation of Rock Chip and Drill Core
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Euro Sun Announces Robust Definitive Feasibility Study for the Rovina Valley Gold- Copper Project in Romania
    Euro Sun Announces Robust Definitive Feasibility Study for the Rovina Valley Gold- Copper Project in Romania March 1, 2021 (Source) — Average annual gold equivalent production of 146,000 ounces over first 10 years at an average AISC of $790/gold equivalent ounce Total initial capex of $399 million Pre-tax Net Present Value of $447 million; IRR of 21.3% at $1,550/oz gold and $3.30/lb copper Euro Sun Mining Inc. (TSX: ESM) (“Euro Sun” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the positive results of the Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) on the Colnic and Rovina open pits – the initial phase of development of its Rovina Valley Gold and Copper Project (the “Rovina Valley Project”) in Romania. Along with the DFS, the Company is also providing an updated mineral resource estimate for the Rovina Valley Project incorporating current metal prices and operating parameters. All amounts are in US dollars unless otherwise indicated. Euro Sun is utilizing a phased development approach for the Rovina Valley Project. The Rovina Valley Project consists of two open pit gold-copper deposits, Colnic and Rovina, and the underground Ciresata gold-copper deposit. The DFS is focused on the exploitation of the two open pit operations. The Ciresata underground deposit is expected to be phased in following the completion of the Colnic and Rovina pits. HIGHLIGHTS Average annual gold equivalent production of 146,000 ounces in year 1-10, consisting of 106,000 ounces of gold and 19 million pounds of copper per annum Average AISC of $790/gold equivalent ounces in years
    [Show full text]
  • Equity Research EURO SUN MINING INC
    November 29, 2017 Initiating Coverage EURO SUN MINING INC. Rovina Valley Ready to Advance, Time to Buy INVESTMENT THESIS Recommendation: BUY Rovina Valley is Europe’s largest copper resource Symbol/Exchange: ESM/TSX and second largest gold resource. Located in the Sector: Metals & Mining “Golden Quadrilateral” in West-Central Romania, All dollar values in US$ unless otherwise noted. recently the country’s National Agency for Mineral Current price: C$1.08 Resources (“NAMR”) officially endorsed the One-year target: C$2.10 project and initiated the ratification process related Return to Target: 94.4% to the mining license. The Rovina Valley mining Cash on hand: C$13.3 MM license requires signatures from various Ministers (discussed in detail later in this report) and we Financial summary believe this process will likely be concluded in the Shares O/S (M) 57.6 52-week range C$0.62 - C$2.02 next 30-60 days. This would be the single largest Market cap (C$M) C$98 Avg. weekly vol. (MM) 0.10 positive de-risking event in the history of the Market float (C$M) C$94 Fiscal year-end 31-Dec company and the project. As such, we believe Euro Sun is a stock to own now. We are initiating Rovina Valley MMt g/T Au % Cu MMoz Au BBlb Cu coverage with a Buy rating and C$2.10/share target. P&P - - - - - M&I (incl. P&P) 406 0.55 0.16% 7.18 1.42 VALUATION Inferred 27 0.38 0.16% 0.33 0.10 ESM trades at 0.51x our very conservative NAVPS, Total Resource 433 0.54 0.16% 7.51 1.52 and as such, our target has a significant bias to the upside.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Romania in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook ROMANIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior October 2019 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Romania By John R. Matzko Romania’s mineral production was not significant on a world and equipment efficiency. The plan included an increase in the scale in 2016; however, the country had significant mineral aluminum scrap processing capacity of the company’s Eco Cast resources for hydrocarbons, ferrous and nonferrous metals, House facility to 90,000 metric tons per year (t/yr) from the precious metals, and salt. In 2016, Romania produced alumina, current 32,000 t/yr. The scrap facility provided an alternative aluminum, cement, coal, copper ore, gypsum, iron ore, lead, source of liquid aluminum to replace some of the energy– natural gas, petroleum, salt, steel, and zinc (table 1; National intensive electrolytic aluminum production. At yearend 2016, Agency for Mineral Resources, 2017). Vimetco employed 3,975 people at its operations in Romania (table 1; Vimetco N.V., 2017, p. 18–20). Minerals in the National Economy Copper and Zinc.—In September, Vast Resources plc of the United Kingdom commissioned a zinc concentrate flotation In 2016, Romania’s real gross domestic product (GDP) line at its Manaila Mine and, by the end of the year, had growth rate was 4.8%; the nominal GDP was $187 billion. The produced 200 t of zinc concentrate at a grade of about 35% industrial sector contributed 23.1% to the total GDP, and the Zn. The company also commissioned a third flotation line with construction sector contributed 6.0%.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueberry Project / August 2018 Disclaimer
    BLUEBERRY PROJECT / AUGUST 2018 DISCLAIMER These materials do not constitute or form any part of any offer or invitation to sell or issue or purchase or subscribe for any shares in Vast Resources plc. (the “Company”) nor shall they or any part of them, or the fact of their distribution, form the basis of, or be relied on in connection with, any contract with the Company relating to any securities. These materials have been prepared as a summary only and do not contain all information about the Company’s assets and liabilities, financial position and performance, profits and losses, prospects and rights and liabilities. No reliance may be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the information contained in these materials or on their completeness. Any reliance thereon could potentially expose you to a significant risk of losing all of the property invested by you or the incurring by you of additional liability. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by the Company, its directors or employees, or their professional advisers as to the accuracy, fairness, sufficiency or completeness of the information, opinions or beliefs contained in these materials. Save in the case of fraud, no liability is accepted for any loss, cost or damage suffered or incurred as a result of the reliance on such information, opinions or beliefs. Certain statements and graphs throughout these materials are “forward‐looking statements” and represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning, among other things, future operating results and various components thereof, including financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives and estimates(including resource estimates), and the Company’s future economic performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Metallogeny of the Gold Quadrilateral: Style and Characteristics of Epithermal – Subvolcanic Mineralized Structures, South Apuseni Mts., Romania*
    STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI, GEOLOGIA, XLIX, 1, 2004, 15-31 METALLOGENY OF THE GOLD QUADRILATERAL: STYLE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF EPITHERMAL – SUBVOLCANIC MINERALIZED STRUCTURES, SOUTH APUSENI MTS., ROMANIA* ŞERBAN – NICOLAE VLAD1‡ & EUGEN ORLANDEA2 ABSTRACT. The Romanian territory contains numerous ore deposits mined since pre-Roman times. An assessment of historical gold production of the Gold Quadri- lateral (GQ) yielded a total estimate of 55.7 Moz of gold throughout an area of 2400 km2. Interpreted in terms of mineralization density this is 23,208 oz of gold/ km2. The geological setting of the GQ is represented mainly by Tertiary (14.7 My to 7.4 My) calc-alkaline volcano-plutonic complexes of intermediate character in sedimentary basins of molasse type. These basins are tectonically controlled by NW-SE lineation across early Alpine magmatic products, i.e. subduction related Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous igneous association (island arc ophiolites and granitoids) and Upper Cretaceous igneous association (banatites). The Tertiary magmatism is associated with extensional tectonics caused by NE escape of the Pannonian region during Upper Oligocene-Lower Miocene times. As a result of tectono-magmatic and mineralization-alteration characteristics, two metallogenetical types were separated in the GQ, i.e. calc-alkaline andesitic (CAM) and sub-alkaline rhyodacitic (SRM). Both develop almost entirely low-sulfidation type of Au epithermal mineralization. However, two subtypes, -rich in sulfide (2-7%) and -poor in sulfide (7-20%) were delineated and correlated with CAM type and SRM type respectively. Furthermore, CAM is connected at deeper levels with Cu-Au+/-Mo porphyry systems in contrast with SRM, which is a non-porphyry environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Tools for Sustainable Gold Mining in Europe – Final Report of SUSMIN
    Tools for Sustainable Gold Mining in Europe – Final report of SUSMIN -project ERA-MIN – SUSMIN -Project Final Report December 2018 Editors: T. Lahtinen (Geological Survey of Finland), A. Pasanen (Geological Survey of Finland), K. Turunen (Geological Survey of Finland), A. Lima (University of Porto), A. Fiúza (University of Porto), M. Szlachta (Wrocław University of Technology), P. Wójtowicz (Wrocław University of Technology), R. Maftei (Geological Institute of Romania), C. Baciu (Babeș-Bolyai University) & S. Nieminen (Kainuu Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment) Reviewed by: The SUSMIN -project (Tools for sustainable gold mining in EU) was implemented under the ERA-MIN Programme (Network on the Industrial Handling of Raw Materials for European Industries) in the first ERA-MIN Joint Call on Sustainable and Responsible Supply of Primary Resources (2013). Tools for Sustainable Gold Mining in Europe – Final report of SUSMIN –project Keywords: Gold, Mining, Environment, Exploration, Mineral processing, Mine waste, Environmental monitoring, Social license to operate In bibliography, this report should be cited as follows: Lahtinen, T., Pasanen, A., Turunen, K., Lima, A., Fiúza, A., Szlachta, M., Wójtowicz, P., Maftei, R., Baciu, C. & Nieminen, S. (eds.). 2018. Tools for Sustainable Gold Mining in Europe – Final report of SUSMIN -project. Report /ERA-MIN –SUSMIN Final Report, 245 pages. © Geological Survey of Finland 2018. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior permission of Geological Survey
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Hope Romania Has the Potential to Become the Largest Gold Producer in Europe If the Deposits in Transylvania Get Approval for Exploitation
    FOCUS ROMANIA Workers check levels in coal bunkers Photo: Photo: Bloomberg News Golden hope Romania has the potential to become the largest gold producer in Europe if the deposits in Transylvania get approval for exploitation BY CECILIA SZENTESY Prior to 1989, Romanian government policy was GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY designed to promote the domestic mining industry Romania’s current gold production is in the region of to reduce the country’s dependence on imported 12,000oz/y, but a number of foreign companies are FAST FACTS metals and minerals. The result was an over investing in exploration projects, which, if developed, Capital: Bucharest development of the mining sector, compared with the could make it Europe’s largest gold producer. Population: 22.1 million available mineral resources, absorbing over 350,000 Gabriel Resources’ Rosia Montana project could Currency: Romanian lei people as direct labour and another 700,000 as indirect become Romania’s largest gold operation, producing Government: Republic labour. an average 500,000oz/y over the life of the mine GDP real growth rate: -7.2% (2009 est) Political changes after this have required the state to and 626,000oz/y in the first five years of production. support the mining sector through a huge budgetary Development of the project has been stalled since OMANIA’S ability to develop its mineral efforts, and between 1990 and 2002 the state 2007, however, when the Environmental Impact resources will be a key measure of its expenditure to sustain the mining sector was of Assessment was suspended as a result of a decision taken economic strength in the coming US$5.2 billion, including subsidies, capital allocations by the former Minister of Environment and Forestry.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multicriteria Decision-Making Analysis of the Roșia Montană Gold Mining Project
    2015 A Multicriteria Decision-Making Analysis of the Roșia Montană Gold Mining Project Adriana Mihai Adina Marincea Love Ekenberg A Multicriteria Decision-Making Analysis of the Roșia Montană Gold Mining Project Research undertaken by MRC – Median Research Centre, Bucharest, Romania eGovlab, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University Adriana Mihai, Median Research Centre* Adina Marincea, Median Research Centre Love Ekenberg, Universitatea din Stockholm și IIASA * Authors contributed equally and are therefore listed in reverse alphabetical order. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 SHORT HISTORY OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS 8 MAIN STAKEHOLDERS 15 Roşia Montana Gold Corporation S.A. 15 The Romanian state 19 The local community 21 Public opinion and civil society 23 A DECISION ANALYSIS MODEL FOR THE ROŞIA MONTANĂ CASE STUDY 25 Decision analysis and DecideIT 25 Prior studies with DecideIT 26 The methodology of the Roşia Montană case study 28 Background research, establishing the criteria and subcriteria 28 Defining the alternatives of development for Roşia Montană 31 Assigning values and weighs to the multi-criteria tree 34 EVALUATION AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 37 Scenario 1: indiscriminative assessment of issues importance 37 Scenario 2: coverage of issue in the consulted data 40 Scenario 3: potential of improving the credibility 43 Scenario 4: stakeholder interest – the Romanian state 44 Scenario 5: stakeholder interest – civil society and local opponents 47 Scenario 6: local, national and transboundary interests 48 Scenario
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Romania in 2015
    2015 Minerals Yearbook ROMANIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior August 2019 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Romania By John R. Matzko Romania’s mineral production was not significant on a world Romania’s total exports amounted to EUR54.6 billion scale in 2015; however, the country had potentially significant ($60.6 billion)1 in 2015, which was an increase of 4.1% mineral resources for ferrous and nonferrous metals, precious compared with that of 2014. Exported mineral products metals, and salt. After joining the European Union (EU) in were valued at EUR2.6 billion ($2.9 billion) or 4.7% of total 2007, much of the country’s metallic ore mining activities for exports by value, of which petroleum products were valued copper, gold, ferroalloys, and zinc stopped or declined because at EUR1.8 billion ($2 billion). Exported base metals and the country’s mining and mineral processing facilities did not articles thereof were valued at EUR4.7 billion ($5.2 billion), meet EU standards. Romania’s reserves of crude petroleum or 8.6% of total exports. Romania’s total imports amounted to and natural gas were the fourth and fifth largest, respectively, EUR63 billion ($70 billion), which was an increase of 7.6% in Europe. The country had 10 crude petroleum refineries, compared with that of 2014. Imported mineral products were which provided it with one of the largest refining capacities in valued at $4.9 billion (a decrease of 24% compared with the Eastern Europe. As of October, however, only four refineries value in 2014), or 7.0% of total imports by value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Romania in 2017-2018
    2017–2018 Minerals Yearbook ROMANIA [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior April 2021 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Romania By Lindsey Abdale and Ji Won Moon Note: In this chapter, information for 2017 is followed by information for 2018. Romania had identified mineral resources of ferrous and Europe (87% of total imports received), followed by countries nonferrous metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels, in Asia (10%) and the Americas (including North America, including coal, natural gas, and crude petroleum. In 2017, Central America and the Caribbean, and South America) (2.4%). Romania produced alumina, aluminum, cement, coal, copper, Romania’s main import trading partners were Germany (which iron and steel, refined lead, natural gas, nitrogen, petroleum, and supplied 20% of Romania’s total imports), Italy (10%), Hungary salt. Although Romania was not a significant mineral producer (7.5%), Poland (5.4%), and France (5.3%) (National Institute of on a global scale, it was one of the leading vertically integrated Statistics, 2018, p. 74, 75, 78). aluminum producers in Europe that use imported bauxite (table 1; Alro S.A., 2019). Production Minerals in the National Economy In 2017, the production of manganese (ore, Mn content) increased by 200%; primary and secondary zinc, by 167%; In 2017, Romania’s real gross domestic product (GDP) feldspar, by 67%; secondary lead, by 38%; nitrogen (N content increased by 6.9% from that of 2016, and the nominal GDP of ammonia), by 18%; copper (Cu content of concentrates), by in 2017 was $212 billion. The GDP in current prices for the 16%; salt (other), by 15%; and bentonite, lignite coal, and steel industrial sector was $53.2 billion, which was an increase of pipes and tubes, by 12% each.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report for the Certej Project, Romania Effective Date: February 2014
    Technical Report for the Certej Project, Romania Effective Date: February 2014 Prepared By: Richard Alexander, P.Eng Stephen Juras, PhD, P.Geo Richard Miller, P.Eng Robin Kalanchey, P.Eng TECHNICAL REPORT CERTEJ PROJECT, ROMANIA Effective Date: February 21, 2014 Prepared by: Rick Alexander, P.Eng. Stephen Juras, P. Geo. Richard Miller, P. Eng. Robin Kalanchey, P. Eng. C E R T E J P ROJECT , R O MANIA T E C H N I C A L R EPORT Contents Table of Contents SECTION • 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Terms of Reference ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Description ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Drilling, Sampling and Analyses ................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Mineral Processing & Gold Recovery ........................................................... 1-3 1.5 Mineral Resource Estimates ........................................................................ 1-4 1.6 Mineral Reserve Estimates .......................................................................... 1-5 1.7 Project Economics ........................................................................................ 1-6 1.8 Conclusion and Recommendations .............................................................. 1-8 SECTION • 2 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resilience of the Apuseni Mountains Regional System
    “BABE Ş-BOLYAI” UNIVERSITY, CLUJ - NAPOCA FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY RESILIENCE OF THE APUSENI MOUNTAINS REGIONAL SYSTEM PhD Thesis abstract PhD candidate: Scientific coordinator: DR ĂGAN MAGDALENA Prof. Dr. COCEAN POMPEI 2011 CLUJ-NAPOCA Introduction Change is omnipresent in both natural and complex systems (that include natural and human components). It can happen following an external perturbation, or can be the result of slow internal evolution. Further, it can occur suddenly, or as a slow and long term variation. The way a complex system faces change depends on its internal capacities, on the magnitude of the perturbation, and on its relations with the environment. As ecological systems possess a natural capacity to adaptation, developed by natural evolution as a response to an ever changing environment; complex systems that includes the human factor also, gain a new mechanism – the voluntary and conscious capacity to manage the system. This management together with the natural recovering processes are the object of the present PhD thesis on the regional system of the Apuseni Mountains. By means of objective reality analysis and observation of the elements of future transformations, we try to bring an optimistic view to the discussions on the disadvantaged and functionally peripheral region of the Apuseni Mountains. The thesis has eight chapters; the first presents the theoretical and methodological aspects, while the others are analysing the regional system by components. Each of them follows a general schema: the presentation of the state of the system through a succinct characterization of the component and the changes inside, the presentation of the elements that support the resilience of the system (natural mechanisms and/or human management), and a final concluding section dedicated to the resilience assessment of the sub-systems analyzed.
    [Show full text]