Appendix 2 – Table of All Written Consultation Responses Received

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 2 – Table of All Written Consultation Responses Received Appendix 2 – Table of all written consultation responses received Questionnaire comments regarding the draft Strategic Transport Plan vision Questionnaire comments regarding the draft Strategic Transport Plan vision Rather motherhood and apple pie in style and content A bus station for Darlington, it really is time DBC were made to do something, they have continuously sold off land that would have been suitable, Darlington town centre is a nightmare to visit with so many buses arriving at the same time to unload and collect passengers.... There doesn't appear to be any major / specific plans or projects relating to Hartlepool. This has to happen before 2029. As usual the north east is always left behind - the rail links between Stockton, Middlesbrough, and Newcastle are shocking - more services needed. It’s motherhood and apple pie! I’d like to see private car use reduced, public transport users rewarded (say by a council tax rebate for non-car households), etc. If it is easy and economical, people will use it. Bus services need improvement to places like Teesside Park. The services that start are never advertised enough and don't run at times when staff from the stores are finishing and starting shifts. Getting 2 buses to and from work now costs the same as a taxi and is less convenient. I appreciate the need to accommodate freight, especially for our industry however the word has negative connotations and i would associate these with heavy industry. Should we try to promote a more people centric vision? Public transport that is well connected and useful at the right times of day making it efficient for as many as the population of the Tees Valley The plan is predictably car focused with a series of specific road improvements. By contrast the cycling and walking plan is a woolly aspiration to improve things, no identified gaps and no funding. I'd include connections to major hubs, e.g. London, Manchester and mention the aim for the services to run on time. It’s not all about Middlesbrough. We need to see more development of rail services to make them affordable to all not the few. Provide good affordable parking at the existing railway station such as Thornaby and Billingham and make it easier for people around Norton to access rail by providing a station on the line through Norton Roseworth, as a large housing area currently dependent on cars for transportation I think it’s a good vision encompassing the important features of travel. I’d like to see disabled access to Billingham station. I would use the train a lot more if I didn’t have to go Thornaby or Hartlepool To go place further afield. Improve traffic flow from Teesport A1053 past Greystone roundabout onto A174, vital if SSI is to be redeveloped effectively. Our area has all the key features required to be a freight hub for the north of England and Scotland - deep port, airport, rail links and road links. This could offer a great chance to develop and diversify the economy of our area. Needs to include our river .... This for commuting possibly freight and definitely tourism Seems clear enough The pollution/noise caused by traffic on Whinfield Road is unbearable, the volume of traffic is increasing by the day causing homes to shake. Unfair that residents are now living on a motorway, please push for The Darlington Bypass !!! It is well overdue !!!!!!! THE AIRPORT MUST LOOK TO MORE FLIGHTS DIRECT TO THE USA/CANADA AND DEVELOP THE HOTEL TO ENABLE VISITORS TO FLY IN AND USE IT WITH BETTER RAIL CONNECTIONS AS PART OF A PACKAGE. THE AIRPORT ITSELF SHOULD BECOME AN ECONOMIC ZONE WITH FLIGHTS INTO THE LONDON CITY AIRPORT. The cost of rail travel to cities outside the region needs to be more consistent e.g. it is often cheaper to travel to Edinburgh than to York Access for the those with Mobility Issues needs to be improved drastically if this plan is to meet t this vision. The expensive Northern link road is not needed to free up a short section of A167 & A1150 which are no worse than any other roads in Darlington during rush hours I have lived in North Darlington all my life and live on a development just off A1150 & have no problem morning & night getting off the estate to travel out of town to work most of the traffic is local school runs during term time out of term time the A167 & A1150 are extremely quiet spending hundreds of millions of tax payers hard earned money to replace some HGV traffic with 10,000 more car journeys from Skerningham Garden Community, Burtree Garden village & Burtree lane proposed developments would be a complete waste of tax payers money & a climate change & environment crime & then to try to call it economic growth for the region? To resurrect the Tees Valley metro project and increase the number of stations in the Tees Valley and introduce new rolling stock and increase services to reduce congestion on the road network It must be s practical, joined up plan. It's no good putting in cycleways from nowhere to nowhere, or 20 meters long, just to satisfy a statistic. Buses must be regular and if necessary variable routes. I suspect a new Eastern crossing may be the better long term option, and that this probably should be prioritised as a better use of the funds being made available for the Tees Flyover relief crossing. Although the Tees Flyover is heavily congested and needs relief, a new eastern crossing would divert a great deal of local and regional traffic away from the Tees Flyover crossing. Possibly sufficient to delay the immediate need to relieve the Tees Flyover. A new eastern crossing would also have the additional benefit of opening up the large areas of vacant land in the east of the Tees corridor between Redcar and Hartlepool for development, relieving some of the demand for land in the west of Tees corridor. A new Eastern crossing would also relieve some pressure from east-west traffic on the A66 that currently has to use the Tees Flyover. There would also be some general relief from traffic on the A172, Ormesby Road and Cargo Fleet Lane corridors linking to the A66 and travelling to/from the Tees Flyover. I honestly think that a new Eastern Crossing achieves so much more, and in both the medium and long term, it dilutes the pressure from traffic using the road transport system around the Tees Flyover area, rather than further concentration of traffic in the Tees Flyover area, which will lead to new traffic congestion problems within the surrounding transport infrastructure. I hope it will succeed in establishing good links between the different forms of transport. There is nothing in that phrase about climate change and transport's effects on it. The underlying assumption is that we need better mobility when in fact we need access. Not sure about 'quick' - that depends on your journey length. Reliability is more important Why wait....get it started now! New railway & bus hub at Guisborough. Have trains from Saltburn to this rail hub. Consider opening up the freight only line to Skinningrove to passenger services. I do not agree with plans for the Darlington Northern Link Road. These plans cause unnecessary destruction of a fantastic portion of greenfield land, rich in biodiversity. Expand and development of the River Tees for freight and explore the possibility of ferry to the continent ie Germany and Scandinavia Yes agreed, but it is a very generic statement used over and over again by every other area creating a strategic transport plan. Be more bold and think outside of the box. Action (and funding) will speak louder than words... Very little seems to be actually moving towards the vision You need to bypass Yarm and link roads better to main routes When can we expect teams and a passenger shipping terminal on the river tees? I think regular needs adding in. It’s not any of those things at present Completely agree with this - but this just feels like more talk and no action. We have schemes proposed in the past that never came to anything or were much reduced. The plan is also very centred on places like Middlesbrough/Darlington - note the heavy use of photos from these areas and very few if any from the Redcar/East Cleveland end. The transport vision doesn't lay out enough detail but feels like the Redcar and East Cleveland end is being neglected once again. Fix all the pot holes first. I think there should be an inclusion of the concept of connectivity which is at the heart of transport. It will probably be underfunded as most of these schemes are. It is imperative that initial estimates are highly accurate with penalties for exceeding budgets and timescales. Important that all the elements connect. Example into the airport road improvements over cycle lanes which don't seem to be used much at all The vision needs to be amplified to stress that the aims for both commercial and community movement will be afforded equal balance How could anyone Disagree? Cycle routes are a joke - especially the barriers they stop so many disabled people using them. Stockton High Street what a sham - ever tried crossing the Road entering Via Yarm Lane direction - who thought that up?? Sounds like a good vision The plans needs to be integrated and not only focus on major towns but East Cleveland as well Roads need to be repaired to a higher standard.
Recommended publications
  • Tees Valley Contents
    RELOCATING TO THE TEES VALLEY CONTENTS 3. Introduction to the Tees Valley 4. Darlington 8. Yarm & Eaglescliffe 10. Marton & Nunthorpe 12. Guisborough 14. Saltburn 16. Wynyard & Hartlepool THE TEES VALLEY Countryside and coast on the doorstep; a vibrant community of creative and independent businesses; growing industry and innovative emerging sectors; a friendly, upbeat Northern nature and the perfect location from which to explore the neighbouring beauty of the North East and Yorkshire are just a few reasons why it’s great to call the Tees Valley home. Labelled the “most exciting, beautiful and friendly region in The Tees Valley provides easy access to the rest of the England” by Lonely Planet, the Tees Valley offers a fantastic country and international hubs such as London Heathrow and quality of life to balance with a successful career. Some of the Amsterdam Schiphol, with weekends away, short breaks and UK’s most scenic coastline and countryside are just a short summer holidays also within easy reach from our local Teesside commute out of the bustling town centres – providing the International Airport. perfect escape after a hard day at the office. Country and coastal retreats are close-by in Durham, Barnard Nestled between County Durham and North Yorkshire, the Tees Castle, Richmond, Redcar, Seaton Carew, Saltburn, Staithes and Valley is made up of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Whitby and city stopovers in London, Edinburgh and Manchester Redcar & Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees. are a relaxing two-and-a-half-hour train journey away. Newcastle, York, Leeds and the Lake District are also all within an hour’s The region has a thriving independent scene, with bars, pubs drive.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Regeneration and Transport Scrutiny Panel
    ECONOMIC REGENERATION AND TRANSPORT SCRUTINY PANEL FEBRUARY 2007 FINAL REPORT – PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN MIDDLESBROUGH PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1. To present the findings of the Economic Regeneration and Transport Panel’s review of Public Transport. AIM OF THE SCRUTINY INVESTIGATION 2. The overall aim of the Scrutiny investigation was to undertake a review of the current issues facing public transport in Middlesbrough by considering public expectations and to consider areas for improvement. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE SCRUTINY INVESTIGATION 3. The terms of reference for the Scrutiny investigation were as outlined below: (a) To gain an understanding of the current public transport issues in Middlesbrough. (b) Find out what people’s perceptions of public transport are. (c) Establish what people want in terms of public transport and then consider if it can be provided? (d) Consider what can be done to improve the experience for current users and how to encourage non-users to switch to public transport. METHODS OF INVESTIGATION 4. Members of the Panel met formally between 6 September and 7 February to discuss/receive evidence relating to this investigation and a detailed record of the topics discussed at those meetings are available from the Committee Management System (COMMIS), accessible via the Council’s website. 5. A brief summary of the methods of investigation are outlined below: (a) Detailed officer presentations supplemented by verbal evidence. - 1 - D:\ModernGov\Migration\IntranetAttachments\OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY BOARD\200803111630\Agenda\$4y1bn1pm.doc (b) Visits to Middlesbrough bus and train stations (c) Discussions with the public (d) Discussions with the local bus operators (e) Information form the Neighbourhood Survey (f) Information from Sheffield City Council 6.
    [Show full text]
  • London North Eastern Region Commentary 04
    Timetable Planning Rules London North Eastern 2020 TIMETABLE Version 2.0 Issued by Amy Forte Timetable Production Manager The Quadrant MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes MK9 1EN Tel: 07801 334042 Final Proposal for Principal Change Timetable 2020 8th February 2019 NETWORK RAIL Timetable Planning Rules Version: 2.0 London North Eastern Final Proposal for Principal Change Date: 8 February 2019 Timetable 2020 Page: 2 of 322 Contents Section Page no. Section Page no. 5.1 Sectional Running Times .........................................74 1 Introduction and General Notes .................... 3 5.1.1 Source of Current SRTs ...................................74 1.1 Index of Routes ............................................................. 4 5.1.2 Method of Calculation .......................................74 1.2 Sectional Appendices and Rule Book .................. 7 5.1.3 New and Revised Sectional Running Times75 1.2.1 Sectional Appendix .............................................. 7 5.1.4 Timing of Trains Consisting of Passenger 1.2.2 Rule Book ................................................................ 7 Vehicles on Goods Lines ............................................75 1.3 Definitions ....................................................................... 9 5.2 Headways ......................................................................75 1.3.1 Train Classification .............................................. 9 5.2.1 Headway Values .................................................75 1.3.2 Days of Operation ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Darlington Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment
    Darlington Updated Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (5), Autumn 2013 DARLINGTON UPDATED STRATEGIC HOUSING LAND AVAILABILITY ASSESSMENT: Autumn 2013 Fifth Update Darlington Borough Council Prepared and Issued by: Planning Policy, Darlington Borough Council January 2014 1 Darlington Updated Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (5), Autumn 2013 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 5 What is this document ? 5 What is the purpose of this document ? 5 Who has been involved in its preparation ? 5 When was the assessment carried out ? 7 2. CONTEXT FOR THE ASSESSMENT 7 Guidance on Carrying Out Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments 8 3. METHODOLOGY 8 Defining the Scope of the Assessment 8 Sources of Supply 9 Agreeing an approach to estimating the Housing Potential of Each Site 10 Approach to Suitability, Availability and Deliverability 10 4. FINDINGS: ASSESSMENT OF NEW SITES & UPDATE TO ASSESSMENT 10 OF EXISTING SITES 5. FINDINGS: POTENTIAL HOUSING SITES 18 SHLAA Sites which are also Commitments 19 Sites Identified as Suitable 20 Sites Identified as Available 20 Achievable Sites 20 Sites Identified as Deliverable 20 Sites Identified as Developable in 6-10 years time 21 Sites Identified as Developable in 10-15 years time 21 Forecast Completions Arising from Potential Housing Sites 22 Overcoming Constraints 22 Summarising the SHLAA findings for Potential Housing Sites 23 Conclusions 24 6. FINDINGS: SITES ALREADY IN THE PLANNING SYSTEM 24 Sites in the Planning ‘Pipeline’ 24 Sites with Planning and Development Briefs in Place 25 Planning Application Refusals 26 Conclusions 26 7. FINDINGS: PLANNING APPLICATION ACTIVITY SINCE 01 OCTOBER 2012 26 8. BRINGING THE FINDINGS TOGETHER 28 Analysis 30 Conclusions 31 2 Darlington Updated Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (5), Autumn 2013 LIST OF TABLES Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTY DURHAM INDEX As at 8Th August 2020 ------COPYRIGHT This Index Has Been Compiled by Janet Brown to Whom the Copyright Belongs
    02/03/2020 NNOORRTTHH EEAASSTT WWAARR MMEEMMOORRIIAALLSS PPRROOJJEECCTT REGISTERED CHARITY NO: 1113088 COUNTY DURHAM INDEX as at 8th August 2020 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COPYRIGHT This Index has been compiled by Janet Brown to whom the copyright belongs. It may not be copied, altered in any way or reproduced without permission. Janet Brown, Bilsdale, Ulgham, Morpeth, Northumberland, NE61 3AR. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also the Parish Page for each place for other relevant information. See “Every Name A Story” for war graves, family headstones and other sources of individual information. We realise that things are changing all the time. Old memorials are being removed, or restored. New memorials are being created. We rely heavily on the public for all information. Items in green bold show that information is needed. Any help would be gratefully received and acknowledged. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NORTH EAST REGIONAL NOTES Glider Pilots 1939-45 War Memorials (Local Authorities’ Powers Act) 1923 An Hour in the Battle of Britain Design of Commonwealth War Grave headstone How to preserve tanks. Makers of memorials Victoria Cross winners. St. George’s Magazine extracts re Northumberland
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Second Local Transport Plan Delivery Report 2008 CONTENTS
    Darlington: A Town on the Move Second Local Transport Plan Delivery Report 2008 CONTENTS Page Executive summary 3 Section 1 - Performance April 2006-March 2008 7 1) Transport’s contribution to wider objectives 7 2) Tackling Congestion 13 3) Improving accessibility 21 4) Travel safety 31 5) Asset management 38 6) Use of resources 42 7) National Demonstration Town projects 47 Section 2 - Review of Strategy and Objectives 61 1) Strategy 61 2) Local context 62 3) Is the strategy right? 64 4) Are the objectives relevant? 66 5) Approach 68 6) Programme and targets 70 7) Conclusion 71 Section 3 - Risk Assessment April 2008 – March 2011 73 SWOT analysis 75 1) Transport’s contribution to wider objectives 76 2) Tackling Congestion 77 3) Improving accessibility 85 4) Travel safety 90 5) Asset management 93 6) Use of resources 94 7) National Demonstration Town projects 95 Annex 1 - Progress with delivering the ROWIP 99 Annex 2 - Network Management Duty – progress to date 103 Annex 3 - Summary of Performance 107 Annex 4 - National and regional policy context 117 2 Executive Summary Darlington’s Second Local Transport Plan sets out the vision of how transport investment and other actions will contribute to improving local people’s quality of life and support the long-term vision for Darlington. The transport objectives were set within the local, sub-regional, regional and national context and the delivery programme and targets were agreed within the indicative budgets set by the Department for Transport. In line with guidance issued by the Department for Transport, this Delivery Report provides: • an update on progress to date, including performance against targets; • a brief review of the strategy, objectives and approach in the current context of local, regional and national context, to ensure that the direction of travel is still right for Darlington; and • a risk assessment of the programme and targets over the remaining 3 years of the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Development Topic Paper
    This document was classified as: OFFICIAL Darlington Proposed Submission Local Plan (2016 – 36) Spatial Distribution of Development Topic Paper February 2021 DARLINGTON Ii wi BOROUGH COUNCIL 1 This document was classified as: OFFICIAL 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The purpose of this topic paper is to describe and justify the spatial distribution of development within the Proposed Submission Local Plan. A brief summary is provided to explain how the development requirements for new housing and employment development have been derived. Background information and detail are provided, outlining how the approach to distributing the identified development needs has been established. Key factors and related issues that have underpinned the locational strategy include the settlement hierarchy, economic factors, transport and infrastructure, physical and environmental constraints, site selection process and development limits methodology, all of which will be discussed in turn. 2. CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICY 2.1 The current planning approach to distributing housing and employment growth across the borough is set out within the existing development plan for Darlington, largely the Core Strategy DPD (adopted April 2011). The policies contained in this document were required to be in conformity with the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the North East, which at that time also formed part of the development plan. The RSS established the scale of housing and employment growth to be planned for in each local authority area and set guidelines for the way in which growth was to be distributed at the local level. 2.2 The spatial strategy for delivering the levels of growth identified in the RSS was to focus new development and regeneration activity within the main urban area.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the Borough of Stockton-On-Tees O
    O S X ck Cemetery Def U B R e R B ID B m G u I r T E t s O A u V L N E R FAIRFIELD OXBRIDGE O A D WARD NE E LA OXB RIDG RIDGE LA Ian Ramsey School OXB NE School H GRANGEFIELD WARD A G R R T E B E U N R U ' N S P A L S A V Holy Trinity A N E L G E N L re School e U n G ' s B E R eck MAP REFERRED TO IN THE BOROUGH OF STOCKTON-ON-TEES O V E AUC KLA ND WAY (ELECTORAL CHANGES) ORDER 2003 SHEET 3 OF 4 Und D Ropner Park Y is A m R a M n B t le A Primary d C K R School a L i A lw N a E y The Grange NUE DUNEDIN AVE HARTBURN Created by the Ordnance Survey Boundaries Section, Southampton, SO16 4GU. HARTBURN WARD HAR TBU RN L Tel: 023 8030 5092 Fax: 023 8079 2035 ANE Community © Crown Copyright 2003 Centre OAD N R GTO LIN DAR Def SHEET 3 Ward Boundary UA Boundary ELTON CP A 66 Und 1 eck rn B 2 rtbu Ha ck Hartburn Be A 66 Elton D A O R M R A PARKFIELDY AND D U R H OXBRIDGE WARD 4 A 3 M L A N E Preston Farm Industrial Estate D A O R M R A Y C O A T H k A ec 66 M B Def RDE WAY A L CONCO A am N th E oa C 5 3 1 Moorhouse A Estate Def Def Longnewton WESTERN PARISHES WARD D Coatham Stob U R H Coatham Stob A M Brick Works L A P N R E E S T O N LA N E Def PRESTON-ON-TEES CP k c e B Def m Chapel Hill a th a LONGNEWTON CP o C D A O Great Holme R M R A Preston Park Y Def Allotment Gardens Barwick Quarry E N A L M A H L R Durham Lane Industrial Park O U N D G N E W TO N LA N E The Rings Teeside Depot High School Riv er Def Te es Works Barwick Golf Course Eaglescliffe Urlay Nook Primary Def School Police Tactical Playing Field Training Centre D A O R A 6 M 7 R
    [Show full text]
  • Hsuk National Network Development
    HSUK NATIONAL NETWORK DEVELOPMENT These diagrams set out the vision of an enhanced national railway network, based around the High Speed UK core network of dedicated high speed lines. NND1 : EXISTING UK RAIL NETWORK This identifies the incomplete connectivity offered by the existing intercity rail network. Main lines radiate from London (East Coast, Midland, West Coast, Great Western) with CrossCountry and TransPennine providing interregional connections. These interregional routes comprise multiple city pairs, greatly increasing their viability, whereas the London-centric system comprises single city pairs. Connectivity is assessed against the benchmark requirement of direct services operating at minimum hourly frequency. Many of these services between regional centres comprise short and often ageing multiple units offering cramped passenger accommodation, not of ‘intercity’ quality. NND2 : HS2 PROPOSALS SUPERIMPOSED ONTO EXISTING UK RAIL NETWORK The HS2 proposals are illustrated in ‘extended Y’ format, extending either side of the Pennines beyond the currently projected terminating points of Leeds and Manchester to all primary regional centres. The resulting system is of limited connectivity, focussed upon London with few viable interregional links; it is also segregated from the existing intercity railway, with high speed stations disconnected from regional ‘hubs’, and intermediate centres left bypassed. This restricted connectivity will compromise economic (and environmental) performance, with most benefits accruing in London where connectivity is concentrated. It will also create a 2-tier system, compromising the basic integrity of the national rail network, and preventing efficient development of rail links within the Northern Powerhouse. NND3/4/5 : HIGH SPEED UK SUPERIMPOSED ONTO EXISTING UK RAIL NETWORK High Speed UK’s blend of new build and upgraded routes, and its radically different ‘spine and spur’ configuration gives comprehensive connectivity between all primary regional centres of the Midlands, the North and Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Regional Industrial Strategy for Tees Valley: a Report for the TUC by the Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, Newcastle University
    O'Brien P, Coombes M, Dawley S, Evans L, Pike A. How to Create Great Jobs: Towards a Regional Industrial Strategy for Tees Valley: A Report for the TUC by the Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, Newcastle University. Trades Union Congress, London: Newcastle University, 2017. Copyright: This is the authors’ accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Trades Union Congress, 2017 Link to article: https://www.tuc.org.uk/research-analysis/reports/how-create-great-jobs-towards-regional-industrial- strategy-tees-valley Date deposited: 08/12/2017 Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk ‘How to Create Great Jobs: Towards a Regional Industrial Strategy for Tees Valley: A Report for the Trades Union Congress by the Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, Newcastle University’ Peter O’Brien, Mike Coombes, Stuart Dawley, Lewis Evans and Andy Pike September 2017 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 2. Putting Industrial Strategy in Context ............................................................................ 6 UK Industrial Strategy ................................................................................................................. 6 TUC and Industrial Strategy .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Borough of Darlington Listed Buildings
    EXTRACTS FROM THE LISTS OF BUILDINGS OF SPECIAL ARCHITECTURAL OR HISTORIC INTEREST FOR THE BOROUGH OF DARLINGTON Updated 01/11/2016 Economic Initiative Division Darlington Borough Council INTRODUCTION WHAT THIS DOCUMENT REPRESENTS This document consists of an export from a Listed Buildings database maintained by Darlington Borough Council. The data has been captured from various statutory lists that have been compiled over the years by the Secretary of State for different parts of the Borough. Some of the information has been amended for clarity where a building has been demolished/de- listed, or an address has changed. Each entry represent a single ‘listing’ and these are arranged by parish or town. The vast majority of entries are in one-to-a-page format, although some of the more recent listings are more detailed and lengthy descriptions, spilling over to 2 or 3 pages. BACKGROUND The first listings, in what is now the Borough of Darlington, were made in 1952. The urban area was the subject of a comprehensive re-survey in 1977, and the rural area in 1986 (western parishes) and 1988 (eastern parishes). A number of formal changes to the lists have been made since, as individual buildings have been ‘spot-listed’, de-listed, had grades changed, descriptions altered and mistakes corrected. Further information on conservation in the Borough of Darlington can be found on our website. See www.planning.gov.uk/conservation. NAVIGATING THIS DOCUMENT Unfortunately there is no index to this document in its current format. Please use the text search facility provided in your PDF Viewer to find the entry that you require.
    [Show full text]