Simulating Scratchpad Memories for General Purpose Processors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Simulating Scratchpad Memories for General Purpose Processors Simulating Scratchpad Memories for General Purpose Processors Francis B. Moreira, Marco A. Z. Alves, Philippe O. A. Navaux UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Informatics Institute - Parallel and Distributed Processing Group Av. Bento Gonc¸alves, 9500 - Campus do Vale - Bloco IV, Bairro Agronomia , Porto Alegre , Brazil {fbmoreira, mazalves, navaux}@inf.ufrgs.br Abstract ficient execution. Optionally, it can be controlled by the compiler[2], the OS or the hardware. Scratchpad memories are simple arrays of bytes con- This paper aims to present and validate a method to sim- trolled to optimize access to data structures. As a regularly ulate a scratchpad on Simics[3], in order to allow simu- used memory within single-purpose processors due to lower lation of scratchpad usage in multiple simulated architec- energy requirements, such as mobile phones and other em- tures. The future objective is to analyze how a scratchpad bedded processors, a scratchpad memory can be an inter- can help multi-core systems. In section 2, a description of esting choice for general purpose systems if it can compete Simics is made and what is changed in the module to sim- with caches with ”least-recently-used” eviction policy. ulate a scratchpad. In section 3, a description about what This paper discusses implementing and simulating a sim- conditions are used to test this change is made. In section ple scratchpad memory, presenting results that show the va- 4, the output of the chosen evaluation method and observa- lidity of the scratchpad simulation method and the potential tions about such output. In 5, discussion over scratchpad ef- gain that could be achieved by using scratchpads. ficiency and plans for the future. 2. Simulation 1. Introduction Simics was chosen due to the cycle-accurate, full-system simulation potential. Simics possesses a module named g- Over the past few decades, processors evolved from cache, which implements simple caches that can easily re- mono-cycle architectures to pipeline architectures, which ceive attributions to properly describe them. This module brought with them the need for faster memories. With the can also be copied and manipulated in the workspace di- aggressive improvement of performance with out-of-order rectory, which will allow the user to rewrite it in order to execution and super scalar architectures, the only memory change the g-cache. Creation of new modules is also al- solution that was able to keep up to some extent was cache, lowed, being thoroughly explained [4]. and the more processors evolve, the larger is the amount Writing an entire device in Simics would be unnecessar- of cache that we need in order to provide data to keep up ily complex, so a smarter way was used to simply simulate processors throughput. Unfortunately, though, memory ef- just the scratchpad presence in the system. Each memory ficiency did stay behind, and became a bottleneck of our device in Simics has a timing model field, which serves to systems. Thus comes the research for better memory sys- identify another object (possibly and probably also a mem- tems, and in this paper, the scratchpad memory. ory) who is listening to this device’s transactions. With such A scratchpad memory is a simple array of bytes, small design, when using a g-cache, you first describe it, then and fast. A thorough description can be found in [1]. It connect it to a id splitter, which will be connected as the is vastly used in single-purpose systems, such as em- physical memory’s timing model; it will then listen to the bedded processors (Motorola MPC500,IBM’s PowerPC memory operations that are passed to the main memory, 405/440,IBM’s new Cell Architecture), since there is no pass them to the L1 caches (executions if L1 instruction need for a cache to switch in available data for multiple pro- cache,reads or writes if L1 data cache), and, if penalties for cesses being alternated in the processor. It gives the pro- hits and misses are defined, the g-caches shall return the grammer the responsibility of deciding what should be put stall time (in cycles) as a result of the function of process- in the fast access memory, in order to obtain the most ef- ing the memory operation. The system, who called the func- This scratchpad is defined in literature as a simple mem- ory storage, an array of bytes, controlled purely by the ap- plication. It has no real politic, but to keep whatever it’s or- dered to store, returning an address indicating in which ad- dress of the scratchpad the memory block inserted begins, and remove whatever it’s ordered to remove. Observe that the scratchpad uses a namespace disjoint from the back- ing store when returning said indexes for different mem- ory blocks. Under the assumption that a scratchpad will re- turn a defined, constant access time (2 cycles for a L1 sized scratchpad, 6 cycles for a L2 sized scratchpad), and the ap- plication is profiled in order to choose which virtual ad- dresses constitute the memory block that will go into the scratchpad, the code in the file ”gc-specialize.c”, which con- tains the operate(memory operation) function (common to every memory device in Simics), can be changed. The oper- ate function either calls handle write or handle read. As an example, the altered handle write function(due to the large size of the actual function, it’s functionalities are specified as comments): Pay special attention to the penalty variable. It counts up the penalty and is usually returned as the stall time, but the only test made checks if the memory address is in the de- scribed block, and in case it is, penalty is returned with the Figure 1. Memory Hierarchy as viewed by selected value. Simics, with Simics abstractions shown in el- This way, we shall simulate, accordingly to the name lipses passed to the cache (in this case, named dc for L1 data cache, short for data cache) the presence of a L1 scratch- pad if the object was instantiated as dc, or a L2 scratchpad tion, will then stall the processor for the value returned by otherwise. the function. Observe that in this code, 2 fields were created: mem base and offset. These fields are not originally within In the case of a two level cache design, if the L1 cache g-cache, as their creation merely serves the purpose of sim- detects a miss, it will actually call the L2 cache function ulating the scratchpad. In the code above, only one com- (who is listening to both L1 caches), and add the return parison is made, when, actually, blocks of memories value of the L2 cache function to it’s own, returning the need to be stored. So, what is needed is a list of base ad- accumulated value of all levels accessed to Simics as the dresses and their respective offsets, and check that the amount of cycles to stall the processor. In the usual Sim- sum of the offsets is not larger than the amount of scratch- ics model, L2 cache has a staller as it’s timing model. Such pad size available, as shown in figure 2, where the basic staller will simply return 78 cycles to the L2 cache func- idea of a scratchpad filled with some blocks of mem- tion, as it is defined to stall 78 cycles, thus simulating an ac- ory is shown. cess to the main memory in terms of stalled cycles. The ba- Two fields were created within Simics g-cache: sic idea of the hierarchy is shown in figure 1, where the id textslspm read and spm write (as shown in the code). splitter divides addresses listened from the main memory These will help us keep track of how many writes and reads in instructions and data, the L1 instruction cache listens to are assigned to the scratchpad. the instruction interface of the id splitter, the L1 data cache listens to the data interface of the id splitter, L2 cache lis- tens to both L1 cache, and a staller returns 78 cycles to L2 3. Evaluation Methodology cache in case a miss occurs in L2 cache. In this paper’s pro- posed model, there is also the abstraction of a controller The target program to test the validity of the scratchpad working as the Simics code in the data cache, as said con- simulation is a float point vector-matrix multiplication. We troller was changed to simulate a scratchpad, which is situ- shall store the entry vector in order to occupy exactly N ated at the right side of the cache to illustrate it in the simu- * 4(float) bytes, where N is the vector size. With the pro- lation. gram implemented, insertion of magic breakpoints is made, static cycles t handle write(generic cache t ∗gc , generic transaction t ∗mem op , conf object t ∗ space , m a p list t ∗map) { int penalty = 0 / ∗ updates statistics ∗ / Figure 2. The scratchpad ... / ∗ looks for a matching line ∗ / / ∗ checks if we got a hit ∗ / which are instructions that will trigger callback functions in / ∗ if positive: ∗ / Simics when they are executed, but will not influence the to- / ∗ we broadcast a hit depending tal execution time. With these, the user can use Simics vari- on cache status and MESI coherence ables to get the current number of cycles before and after model ∗ / the main loops execution, thus being able to determine how ... many cycles the execution took, and how much gain or loss penalty += mesi send(gc ,mem op) is achieved with different implementations.
Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Benefits of Scratchpad Memories for Scientific Matrix
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Computer Science and Engineering ANALYZING THE BENEFITS OF SCRATCHPAD MEMORIES FOR SCIENTIFIC MATRIX COMPUTATIONS A Thesis in Computer Science and Engineering by Bryan Alan Cover c 2008 Bryan Alan Cover Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science May 2008 The thesis of Bryan Alan Cover was reviewed and approved* by the following: Mary Jane Irwin Evan Pugh Professor of Computer Science and Engineering Thesis Co-Advisor Padma Raghavan Professor of Computer Science and Engineering Thesis Co-Advisor Raj Acharya Professor of Computer Science and Engineering Head of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii Abstract Scratchpad memories (SPMs) have been shown to be more energy efficient, have faster access times, and take up less area than traditional hardware-managed caches. This, coupled with the predictability of data presence and reduced thermal properties, makes SPMs an attractive alternative to cache for many scientific applications. In this work, SPM based systems are considered for a variety of different functions. The first study performed is to analyze SPMs for their thermal and area properties on a conven- tional RISC processor. Six performance optimized variants of architecture are explored that evaluate the impact of having an SPM in the on-chip memory hierarchy. Increasing the performance and energy efficiency of both dense and sparse matrix-vector multipli- cation on a chip multi-processor are also looked at. The efficient utilization of the SPM is ensured by profiling the application for the data structures which do not perform well in traditional cache.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Architectures 13 Preeti Ranjan Panda
    Memory Architectures 13 Preeti Ranjan Panda Abstract In this chapter we discuss the topic of memory organization in embedded systems and Systems-on-Chips (SoCs). We start with the simplest hardware- based systems needing registers for storage and proceed to hardware/software codesigned systems with several standard structures such as Static Random- Access Memory (SRAM) and Dynamic Random-Access Memory (DRAM). In the process, we touch upon concepts such as caches and Scratchpad Memories (SPMs). In general, the emphasis is on concepts that are more generally found in SoCs and less on general-purpose computing systems, although this distinction is not very clearly defined with respect to the memory subsystem. We touch upon implementations of these ideas in modern research and commercial scenarios. In this chapter, we also point out issues arising in the context of the memory architectures that become exported as problems to be addressed by the compiler and system designer. Acronyms ALU Arithmetic-Logic Unit ARM Advanced Risc Machines CGRA Coarse Grained Reconfigurable Architecture CPU Central Processing Unit DMA Direct Memory Access DRAM Dynamic Random-Access Memory GPGPU General-Purpose computing on Graphics Processing Units GPU Graphics Processing Unit HDL Hardware Description Language PCM Phase Change Memory P.R. Panda () Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India e-mail: [email protected] © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 411 S. Ha, J. Teich (eds.), Handbook of Hardware/Software Codesign, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-7267-9_14 412 P.R. Panda SoC System-on-Chip SPM Scratchpad Memory SRAM Static Random-Access Memory STT-RAM Spin-Transfer Torque Random-Access Memory SWC Software Cache Contents 13.1 Motivating the Significance of Memory....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gpgpus: Overview Pedagogically Precursor Concepts UNIVERSITY of ILLINOIS at URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
    GPGPUs: Overview Pedagogically precursor concepts UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN © 2018 L. V. Kale at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Precursor Concepts: Pedagogical • Architectural elements that, at least pedagogically, are precursors to understanding GPGPUs • SIMD and vector units. • We have already seen those • Large scale “Hyperthreading” for latency tolerance • Scratchpad memories • High BandWidth memory L.V.Kale 2 Tera MTA, Sun UltraSPARC T1 (Niagara) • Tera computers, With Burton Smith as a co-founder (1987) • Precursor: HEP processor (Denelcor Inc.), 1982 • First machine Was MTA • MTA-1, MTA-2, MTA-3 • Basic idea: • Support a huge number of hardWare threads (128) • Each With its oWn registers • No Cache! • Switch among threads on every cycle, thus tolerating DRAM latency • These threads could be running different processes • Such processors are called “barrel processors” in literature • But they sWitched to the “next thread” alWays.. So your turn is 127 clocks aWay, always • Was especially good for highly irregular accesses L.V.Kale 3 Scratchpad memory • Caches are complex and can cause unpredictable impact on performance • Scratchpad memories are made from SRAM on chip • Separate part of the address space • As fast or faster than caches, because no tag-matching or associative search • Need explicit instructions to bring data into scratchpad from memory • Load/store instructions exist betWeen registers and scratchpad • Example: IBM/Toshiba/Sony cell processor used in PS/3 • 1 PPE, and 8 SPE cores • Each SPE core has 256 KiB scratchpad • DMA is mechanism for moving data betWeen scratchpad and external DRAM L.V.Kale 4 High BandWidth Memory • As you increase compute capacity of processor chips, the bandWidth to DRAM comes under pressure • Many past improvements (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardware and Software Optimizations for GPU Resource Management
    Hardware and Software Optimizations for GPU Resource Management A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Vishwesh Jatala to the DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR, INDIA December, 2018 ii Scanned by CamScanner Abstract Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) are widely adopted across various domains due to their massive thread level parallelism (TLP). The TLP that is present in the GPUs is limited by the number of resident threads, which in turn depends on the available resources in the GPUs { such as registers and scratchpad memory. Recent GPUs aim to improve the TLP, and consequently the throughput, by increasing the number of resources. Further, the improvements in semiconductor fabrication enable smaller feature sizes. However, for smaller feature sizes, the leakage power is a significant part of the total power consumption. In this thesis, we provide hardware and software solutions that aim towards the two problems of GPU design: improving throughput and reducing leakage energy. In the first work of the thesis, we focus on improving the performance of GPUs by effective resource management. In GPUs, resources (registers and scratchpad memory) are allocated at thread block level granularity, as a result, some of the resources may not be used up completely and hence will be wasted. We propose an approach that shares the resources of SM to utilize the wasted resources by launching more thread blocks in each SM. We show the effectiveness of our approach for two resources: registers and scratchpad memory (shared memory). On evaluating our approach experimentally with 19 kernels from several benchmark suites, we observed that kernels that underutilize register resource show an average improvement of 11% with register sharing.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Memory Subsystem Performance Using Viva: Virtual Vector Architecture
    Improving Memory Subsystem Performance using ViVA: Virtual Vector Architecture Joseph Gebis12,Leonid Oliker12, John Shalf1, Samuel Williams12,Katherine Yelick12 1 CRD/NERSC, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720 2 CS Division, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 fJGebis, LOliker, JShalf, SWWilliams, [email protected] Abstract. The disparity between microprocessor clock frequencies and memory latency is a primary reason why many demanding applications run well below peak achievable performance. Software controlled scratchpad memories, such as the Cell local store, attempt to ameliorate this discrepancy by enabling precise control over memory movement; however, scratchpad technology confronts the programmer and compiler with an unfamiliar and difficult programming model. In this work, we present the Virtual Vector Architecture (ViVA), which combines the memory semantics of vector computers with a software-controlled scratchpad memory in order to provide a more effective and practical approach to latency hiding. ViVA requires minimal changes to the core design and could thus be eas- ily integrated with conventional processor cores. To validate our approach, we implemented ViVA on the Mambo cycle-accurate full system simulator, which was carefully calibrated to match the performance on our underlying PowerPC Apple G5 architecture. Results show that ViVA is able to deliver significant per- formance benefits over scalar techniques for a variety of memory access pat- terns as well as two important memory-bound compact kernels, corner turn and sparse matrix-vector multiplication — achieving 2x–13x improvement compared the scalar version. Overall, our preliminary ViVA exploration points to a promis- ing approach for improving application performance on leading microprocessors with minimal design and complexity costs, in a power efficient manner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dynamic Scratchpad Memory Unit for Predictable Real-Time Embedded Systems
    A Dynamic Scratchpad Memory Unit for Predictable Real-Time Embedded Systems by Saud Wasly A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Applied Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 c Saud Wasly 2012 I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Scratch-pad memory is a popular alternative to caches in real-time embedded systems due to its advantages in terms of timing predictability and power consumption. However, dynamic management of scratch-pad content is challenging in multitasking environments. To address this issue, this thesis proposes the design of a novel Real-Time Scratchpad Memory Unit (RSMU). The RSMU can be integrated into existing systems with minimal architectural modifications. Furthermore, scratchpad management is performed at the OS level, requiring no application changes. In conjunction with a two-level scheduling scheme, the RSMU provides strong timing guarantees to critical tasks. Demonstration and evaluation of the system design is provided on an embedded FPGA platform. iii Acknowledgements My great gratitude is to Allah the only god, the Almighty who guided me in every step of this work with his infinite graciousness and bounties. I would like to thank all the kind people around me who made this possible, to only some of whom it is possible to give particular mention here.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Exploration of Heterogeneous Memory Systems Marcos Horro, Gabriel Rodr´Iguez, Juan Tourino,˜ Mahmut T
    1 Architectural exploration of heterogeneous memory systems Marcos Horro, Gabriel Rodr´ıguez, Juan Tourino,˜ Mahmut T. Kandemir Abstract—Heterogeneous systems appear as a viable design whether an access presents reuse that is easily exploitable alternative for the dark silicon era. In this paradigm, a processor by a regular cache, or whether the LRU algorithm and cache chip includes several different technological alternatives for im- conflicts make it advisable to manually allocate the variable plementing a certain logical block (e.g., core, on-chip memories) which cannot be used at the same time due to power constraints. to a scratchpad to better take advantage of the available The programmer and compiler are then responsible for select- locality. Taking into account the hardware characteristics of ing which of the alternatives should be used for maximizing the different available memory modules, access and transfer performance and/or energy efficiency for a given application. costs for each possible allocation are calculated, and a final This paper presents an initial approach for the exploration of allocation is decided considering also memory sizes and power different technological alternatives for the implementation of on-chip memories. It hinges on a linear programming-based budgets. model for theoretically comparing the performance offered by the This paper is organized as follows. Section II introduces available alternatives, namely SRAM and STT-RAM scratchpads scratchpad memories. Section III analyzes the gem5 frame- or caches. Experimental results using a cycle-accurate simulation work and discusses the simulation of scratchpad memories tool confirm that this is a viable model for implementation into in the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Scratchpad Memory Architecture with Emerging STT-RAM Memory Technologies
    Designing Scratchpad Memory Architecture with Emerging STT-RAM Memory Technologies Peng Wang,1 Guangyu Sun,1 Tao Wang,1 Yuan Xie,2 Jason Cong1,3,4 1Center for Energy-Efficient Computing and Applications, School of EECS, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China 2Computer Science and Engineering Department, Pennsylvania State University, PA 16802, USA 3Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 4UCLA/PKU Joint Research Institute in Science and Engineering {wang_peng, gsun, wangtao}@pku.edu.cn, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Scratchpad memories (SPMs) have been widely used major drawback we need to overcome. Unlike SRAM, in in embedded systems to achieve comparable performance with which read and write operations consume the same time and better energy efficiency when compared to caches. Spin-transfer energy, a write operation of STT-RAM needs much longer torque RAM (STT-RAM) is an emerging nonvolatile memory latency and higher energy than a read operation. Moreover, technology that has low-power and high-density advantages over the latency and energy of write operations in conventional SRAM. In this study we explore and evaluate a series of STT-RAM are several times larger than those of SRAM. scratchpad memory architectures consisting of STT-RAM. The Since on-chip memory is nearest to CPU in the memory experimental results reveal that with optimized design, STT- hierarchy, reducing the access latency of on-chip memory is RAM is an effective alternative to SRAM for scratchpad critical to performance. memory in low-power embedded systems. New STT-RAM device cell designs have been developed I.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Embedded Systems Dilemma of Chip Memory Diversity By
    International Journal of Engineering, Pure and Applied Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2016 Embedded Systems Dilemma of Chip Memory Diversity by Scratchpad Memory for Cache On-chip Memory Ravi Kumar Sharma Research Scholar, Department of Computer Application, Surya World University, Rajpura , India Email: [email protected] Abstract: -The aim of this paper is the problem of chip memory selection for computationally intensive applications by proposing scratch pad memory as an alternative to cache. Area and energy for different scratch pad and cache size are computed using CACTI tools while performance was evaluated using the trace results. In this paper, an algorithm integrated into a compiler is presented which analyses the application and selects program and data parts which are placed into the scratchpad. Comparisons against a cache solution show remarkable advantages between 12% and 43% in energy consumption for designs of the same memory size. Key Words-Scratchpad Memory, Cache Memory, CACTI, Compiler, Memory. 1. INTRODUCTION The salient feature of portable devices is light Experimental environment requires the use of a weight and low power consumption. Applications in packing algorithm (which is a compiler support) multimedia, video processing, speech to map the elements onto the scratchpad memory. processing[1], DSP applications and wireless Finally, we report the performance and energy communication require efficient memory design consumption for different cache and scratchpad since on chip memory occupies more than 50% of sizes, for the various applications. We include the the total chip area [2]. This will typically reduce main memory energy consumption to study the the energy consumption of the memory unit, complete system energy requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Application-Specific Memory Management in Embedded Systems Using Software-Controlled Caches
    CSAIL Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Application-Specific Memory Management in Embedded Systems Using Software-Controlled Caches Derek Chiou, Prabhat Jain, Larry Rudolph, Srinivas Devadas In the proceedings of the 37th Design Automation Conference Architecture, 2000, June Computation Structures Group Memo 448 The Stata Center, 32 Vassar Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 ApplicationSp ecic Memory Management for Emb edded Systems Using SoftwareControlled Caches Derek Chiou, Prabhat Jain, Larry Rudolph, and Srinivas Devadas Department of EECS Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 he and scratchpad memory onchip since each addresses ABSTRACT cac We prop ose a way to improve the p erformance of embed a dierent need Caches are transparent to software since ded pro cessors running dataintensive applications byallow they are accessed through the same address space as the ing software to allo cate onchip memory on an application larger backing storage They often improveoverall software sp ecic basis Onchip memory in the form of cache can p erformance but are unpredictable Although the cache re be made to act like scratchpad memory via a novel hard placement hardware is known predicting its p erformance ware mechanism which we call column caching Column dep ends on accurately predicting past and future reference caching enables dynamic cache partitioning in software by patterns Scratchpad memory is addressed via an indep en mapping data regions to a sp ecied
    [Show full text]
  • FPGA Implementation of a Configurable Cache/Scratchpad
    FPGA Implementation of a Configurable Cache/Scratchpad Memory with Virtualized User-Level RDMA Capability George Kalokerinos, Vassilis Papaefstathiou, George Nikiforos, Stamatis Kavadias, Manolis Katevenis, Dionisios Pnevmatikatos and Xiaojun Yang Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, Heraklion, Crete, Greece – member of HiPEAC {george,papaef,nikiforg,kavadias,kateveni,pnevmati,yxj}@ics.forth.gr Abstract—We report on the hardware implementation of a advances in parallel programming and runtime systems [4][5] local memory system for individual processors inside future allow the use of explicit communication with minimal burden chip multiprocessors (CMP). It intends to support both implicit to the programmers, who merely have to identify the input communication, via caches, and explicit communication, via di- rectly accessible local (”scratchpad”) memories and remote DMA and output data sets of their tasks. (RDMA). We provide run-time configurability of the SRAM Our goal is to provide unified hardware support for both im- blocks near each processor, so that part of them operates as 2nd plicit and explicit communication. To achieve low latency, we level (local) cache, while the rest operates as scratchpad. We also integrate our mechanisms close to the processor, in the upper strive to merge the communication subsystems required by the cache levels, unlike traditional RDMA which is implemented cache and scratchpad into one integrated Network Interface (NI) and Cache Controller (CC), in order to economize on circuits. at the level of the I/O bus. We provide configurability of the The processor communicates with the NI in user-level, through local SRAM blocks that are next to each core, so that they virtualized command areas in scratchpad; through a similar operate either as cache or scratchpad, or as a dynamic mix mechanism, the NI also provides efficient support for synchro- of the two.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiler-Directed Scratchpad Memory Management Via Graph Coloring
    Compiler-Directed Scratchpad Memory Management via Graph Coloring Lian Li, Hui Feng and Jingling Xue University of New South Wales Scratchpad memory (SPM), a fast on-chip SRAM managed by software, is widely used in embed- ded systems. This paper introduces a general-purpose compiler approach, called memory coloring, to assign static data aggregates such as arrays and structs in a program to an SPM. The novelty of this approach lies in partitioning the SPM into a pseudo register file (with interchangeable and aliased registers), splitting the live ranges of data aggregates to create potential data transfer statements between SPM and off-chip memory, and finally, adapting an existing graph coloring algorithm for register allocation to assign the data aggregates to the pseudo register file. Our experimental results using a set of 10 C benchmarks from MediaBench and MiBench show that our methodology is capable of managing SPMs efficiently and effectively for large embedded appli- cations. In addition, our SPM allocator can obtain close to optimal solutions when evaluated and compared against an existing heuristics-based SPM allocator and an ILP-based SPM allocator. Categories and Subject Descriptors: D.3.4 [Programming Languages]: Processors—compilers; optimization; B.3.2 [Memory Structures]: Design Styles—Primary memory; C.3 [Special- Purpose And Application-Based Systems]: Real Time and Embedded Systems General Terms: Algorithms, Languages, Experimentation, Performance Additional Key Words and Phrases: Scratchpad memory, software-managed cache, memory allo- cation, graph coloring, memory coloring, live range splitting, register coalescing 1. INTRODUCTION Scratchpad memory (SPM) is a fast on-chip SRAM managed by software (the application and/or compiler).
    [Show full text]