DOCSLIB.ORG

A Landowner's Guide to Common North American Predators Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Landowner's Guide to Common North American Predators Of Jack H. Berryman Institute A Landowner’s Guide to Department of Fisheries and Wildlife College of Natural Resources Common North American Predators Utah State University Logan UT 84322-5210 of Upland-nesting Birds For further information please contact the agency listed below. Jack H. Berryman Institute for Wildlife Damage Management, International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and The Berryman Institute National Fish and Wildlife Foundation The Berryman Institute A Landowner’s Guide to Common North American Predators of Upland-nesting Birds Terry A. Messmer, Michael R. Conover, Raymond D. Dueser, Paul W. Klimack, and Charles E. Dixon 1997 JACK H. BERRYMAN INSTITUTE DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE COLLEGE OF NATURAL RESOURCES UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY LOGAN, UTAH 84322-5210 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION The Prey . 4 The Predators . 6 Predator/Prey Dynamics . 6 Impacts of Predation on Upland-nesting Birds . 7 Breeding Bird Biology, Habitat Use, and Predation . 8 BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF MAMMALIAN PREDATORS Canids Coyote . 9 Red Fox . 10 Domestic and Feral Dogs . 11 Felids Domestic and Feral Cats . 12 Mustelids Badger . 13 Mink . 14 Striped Skunk . 15 Weasels . 16 Procyonids Raccoon . 17 Sciurids Ground Squirrels . 18 THE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF REPTILIAN PREDATORS Reptilids Lizards . 19 Snakes . 19 Turtles . 20 BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF AVIAN PREDATORS Aves Great-Horned Owl . 20 Red-Tailed Hawk . 21 American Crow . 22 Common Raven . 22 Magpies . 23 SUMMARY . 24 2 This publication provides information designed to increase the reader’s basic understanding of predator/prey interactions and the biology and ecology of com- mon North American predators of upland-nesting birds, their nests, and young. We also discuss the potential impacts of these predators on upland-nesting bird populations. By understanding the biology and ecology of predators, the reader will be better prepared to make informed management decisions about how to enhance local upland-nesting bird populations. Information regarding specific techniques that can be used to manage common predators of upland-nesting birds, can be found in an accompanying publication entitled, “A Landowner’s Guide to Manag- ing Common Predators of North American Upland-nesting Birds.” Most illustrations used in this publication are from “Wildlife Drawings” Copy- right 1980 by the Conservation Commission of the State of Missouri. Used with permission. The badger and long-tailed weasel are line drawings reproductions by Carmen Luna, Jamestown, ND of furbear stamp artwork used in the North Dakota Game and Fish Department’s Furbearer Stamp and Print Program. The original artists are Michael D. Dunn and Van Norby, respectively. The front cover photo was provided courtesy of Alan B. Sargeant, Jamestown, N.D. Funding for this publication was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, the Jack H. Berryman Institute, and a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Aid, Wildlife Restoration Grant. This publication can be cited as: Messmer, T. A., M. R. Conover, R. D. Dueser, P. W. Klimack, and C. E. Dixon. 1997. A landowner’s guide to common North American predators of upland- nesting birds. Berryman Institute Publication No.13, Utah State Univ. Logan. 24 pp. 3 INTRODUCTION The Prey Upland-nesting birds are those bird species that typically nest on the ground (Figure 1). Although most upland-nesting birds nest directly on dry ground, some will nest on floating or standing vegetation located over water. Some upland-nesting birds, such as snow geese (Chen caerulescens), and gulls (Larus spp.) prefer to nest in large colonies on open shore- lines or islands, forsaking concealment for safety in numbers. By nesting in colonies, an individual bird increases the odds that a predator entering the colony will prey on young other than its own. Smaller upland-nesting birds, such as the common nighthawk (Chordeiles minor), prefer to nest on bare ground. The size and coloration of the female, her eggs, and nest afford nesting nighthawks excellent conceal- ment. Other upland- Figure 1 4 Figure 2 nesting birds such as the mallard (Anas platyrhyncos), select nest sites concealed by tall, dense vegetation (Figure 2). Nest site selection is governed primarily by the need to avoid predation. Upland-nesting birds employ other adaptations to increase their chances of raising young. These adapta- tions include anti-predator behavior (e.g., feigning injury), cryptic or camouflage coloration of the females, and the ability to renest if their first nests are destroyed (Figure 3) Figure 3 5 The Predators Evolution has adapted predators to seek prey which provide them with highest returns (in terms of calories and nutrients) for the least expenditure of time and energy. Some preda- tor species employ unique hunting strategies, designed to capture specific prey. Others are opportunistic, taking any prey encountered during the course of daily activities. This publication discusses the ecology of some common North American mammalian and avian predators that can impact avian populations. Other predators not discussed in this publica- tion also will prey on upland-nesting birds, their eggs, and young. Predator/Prey Dynamics When people think of predation, they often visualize a cougar, wolf, or other large carni- vore, killing a deer or elk (Figure 4). In reality, literally thousands of acts of predation (such as a bird eating an insect) occur for each instance of a cougar killing a deer. (Figure 5) Even the large predators kill and eat many more small prey for each large animal taken. The popular belief that predators only kill young, old, sick, and injured animals, thus keeping prey in balance with their habitat, is not entirely true. In natural systems, predator and prey numbers may tend to cycle together. However, few truly natural systems remain. Human activities that alter original habitats have tended to favor some animals at the expense of others. If these activities favor a predator by providing it with alternate food sources or cover during some critical period, predator numbers will increase, and this may result in a greater impact on their prey species. Predators are less abundant than the prey species they pursue. For example, in a given area, the predator community may include one coyote, two great- Figure 4 6 horned owls, and two red-tailed hawks. In this same area, the potential prey base may consist of 100 rabbits, 2,000 birds, and as many as 25,000 mice. In a “balanced” system, when prey num- bers decrease, predator numbers would also be expected to decline. However, problems may arise if predators in- crease in response to abundant alternate food sources. In this situation, preferred populations of prey spcies may be held at unusually low densities by predators. If prey populations are not be able to respond to improved habitat conditions because of predators, the situation is referred to as a “predator pit.” Weather and climate can also affect the physical condition and vulnerability of the prey, thus impact population density, reproduc- tive potentials, and susceptibility to disease. Probably the most important statistic used to Figure 5 determine the impact a predator has on a prey species is the percent of the prey population taken by a specific predator. By knowing this information, managers can implement appropriate strategies to maintain predator and prey species populations in balance with the local habitat conditions. Impacts of Predation on Upland-Nesting Birds Predators can impact upland-nesting bird population in several ways. Adult males and nesting females are preyed upon by a variety of avian (eagles, hawks, owls)(Figure 6), mammalian (coyotes, skunks, raccoons, squirrels), and reptilian (snakes) preda- tors. Predators also eat the young and eggs. However, the actual impact of predation on upland-nesting birds ultimately depends on the composition and density of the predator community, habitat conditions, and the availability of alternate food sources. Figure 6 7 Breeding Bird Biology, Habitat Use, and Predation Upland-nesting bird populations increase under favorable habitat conditions and decrease when conditions deteriorate. Generally upland-nesting birds that select nest sites in narrow strips of cover, such as those found around wetlands in plowed fields and along roads, are less successful due to higher predation rates than those situated in large blocks of continu- ous cover. Upland-nesting bird populations are highest at the end of the reproductive season (late spring or early summer), then decline to yearly lows, which occur just prior to the next reproductive season (Figure 7). Predation may help to moderate population peaks and lows. However, if predator populations are high, upland-nesting bird populations may decline and remain depressed. Current research suggests that in altered habitats, predators can maintain upland-nesting birds at population levels which are lower than what would otherwise occur. For mallards, over-winter female survival of greater than 30% and nest success of greater than 15% may be necessary to maintain local upland-nesting bird breed- ing populations. In areas where female survival and nest success are low, mammalian predators, such as the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), which prey directly on nesting females, can have the greatest impact on bird populations. Figure 7 8 BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF MAMMALIAN PREDATOR CANIDS Coyote ((Canis latrans) Coyotes resemble small “collie” dogs in body form and size (Figure 8). The color of the fur of the upper body is generally gray or reddish-gray with the underparts being a lighter yellowish. A coyote’s coloration may vary by geographic location. Adult coyotes may exceed 50 inches in length and weigh over 50 pounds. Males are larger than females. The body and muzzle are slender, the ears small, pointed, and erect, and the tail is bushy. When running, coyotes carry their tails low. This characteristic helps distinguish them at a distance from domestic dogs and wolves.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cougar-Squak Corridor Park Eastside Audubon Society Bird Survey
    Cougar-Squak Corridor Park Eastside Audubon Society Bird Survey Date Range Oct 1, 2015 - Sep 30, 2016 Total Number of Species 57 Total Number of Locations Cougar-Sqauk Corridor Park, Issaquah, WA Checklists 15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Number of Species 11 11 -- 14 11 25 30 35 36 35 22 16 Number of Individuals 43 48 -- 200 72 221 210 189 372 241 113 63 Number of Checklists 1 1 -- 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Species Name High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count High Count Canada Goose -- -- -- 2 -- 2 1 -- -- -- -- -- Trumpeter/Tundra Swan -- -- -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- -- -- Mallard -- -- -- -- -- 4 -- 2 -- -- -- -- Great Blue Heron -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- -- 1 -- Osprey -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- -- Bald Eagle -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- 1 -- -- -- Red-tailed Hawk -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 -- 1 -- -- -- Rock Pigeon -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- Band-tailed Pigeon -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 3 6 -- Northern Pygmy-Owl -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 -- -- -- -- -- Barred Owl -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- 1 1 -- 1 -- Vaux's Swift -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 -- Anna's Hummingbird -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 1 -- Rufous Hummingbird -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 -- -- -- -- Belted Kingfisher -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 -- -- Red-breasted Sapsucker -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 1 1 -- -- -- Downy Woodpecker -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 2 1 -- 6 Hairy Woodpecker 1 2 -- -- --
    [Show full text]
  • Crows and Ravens Wildlife Notes
    12. Crows & Ravens Crows and ravens belong to the large family Corvidae, along with more than 200 other species including jays, nutcrackers and magpies. These less-than-melodious birds, you may be surprised to learn, are classified as songbirds. raven American Crow insects, grain, fruit, the eggs and young of other birds, Crows are some of the most conspicuous and best known organic garbage and just about anything that they can find of all birds. They are intelligent, wary and adapt well to or overpower. Crows also feed on the carcasses of winter – human activity. As with most other wildlife species, crows and road-killed animals. are considered to have “good” points and “bad” ones— value judgements made strictly by humans. They are found Crows have extremely keen senses of sight and hearing. in all 50 states and parts of Canada and Mexico. They are wary and usually post sentries while they feed. Sentry birds watch for danger, ready to alert the feeding birds with a sharp alarm caw. Once aloft, crows fly at 25 Biology to 30 mph. If a strong tail wind is present, they can hit 60 Also known as the common crow, an adult American mph. These skillful fliers have a large repertoire of moves crow weighs about 20 ounces. Its body length is 15 to 18 designed to throw off airborne predators. inches and its wings span up to three feet. Both males Crows are relatively gregarious. Throughout most of the and females are black from their beaks to the tips of their year, they flock in groups ranging from family units to tails.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Dewey Trail Checklist
    Wrangell - Mount Dewey Trail Species Checklist For more information, see https://ak.audubon.org/. Seasons: Spring: March–May Summer: June and July Fall: August–November Winter: December–February Frequency Classification: C = Common: Occurs in essentially all suitable habitats during appropriate seasons, with certain species at times abundant; species should be easy to find. F = Fairly common: Occurs in some or most suitable habitats during appropriate seasons, but less abundant and at times few in number; species often found. U = Uncommon: Occurs in relatively small numbers; species not observed regularly even in proper habitats. R = Rare: Either found in restricted habitat, or occurs most years in small numbers; species difficult to find. V = Very Rare: A species beyond its normal range that may occur intermittently and in very small numbers. + = Accidental: Only one or two historical records to date. Guild Species Sp Su Fa Wi Swans, Geese, Ducks ☐ Canada Goose* C F C F Grouse, Ptarmigan ☐ Sooty Grouse* C C C C Grouse, Ptarmigan ☐ Spruce Grouse* R R R R Herons, Bitterns ☐ Great Blue Heron* F F F U Hawks, Eagles, etc. ☐ Bald Eagle* C C C C Hawks, Eagles, etc. ☐ Northern Goshawk* U U U U Hawks, Eagles, etc. ☐ Osprey* R R R – Hawks, Eagles, etc. ☐ Red-tailed Hawk* U U U V Hawks, Eagles, etc. ☐ Sharp-shinned Hawk* F U F R Hawks, Eagles, etc. ☐ Steller's Sea-Eagle + + + + Falcons ☐ American Kestrel* U V U V Falcons ☐ Merlin* U R U R Alcids ☐ Marbled Murrelet* C C C C Alcids ☐ Rhinoceros Auklet* F F F V Pigeons, Doves ☐ Band-tailed Pigeon*
    [Show full text]
  • Species Almanac • Nature Activities At
    The deeriNature Almanac What is the i in deeriNature? Is it information, internet? How about identification. When you go out on the Deer Isle preserves, what species are you almost certain to encounter? Which ones might you wish to identify? Then how do you organize your experience so that learning about the nearly overwhelming richness of nature becomes wonderfully satisfying? A century ago every farmer, medicine woman, and indeed any educated man or woman felt that they should have a solid knowledge of the plants around them. The Fairbanks Museum in St. Johnsbury, Vermont has maintained a Flower Table with labeled specimens since 1905. The Deer Isle-Stonington Historical Society has an antique herbarium collection made by Ada Southworth, a Dunham’s point rusticator. Today there are lovely field guides galore but the equivalent of a local list can come to you now by digital download. Here is an almanac, a list of likely plant and animal species (and something about rocks too) for our Deer Isle preserves, arranged according to season and habitat. Enjoy this free e-Book on your desktop, tablet or smartphone. Take this e-book with you on the trails and consult the Point of Interest signs. If you have a smartphone and adequate coverage, at some preserves a QR code will tell you more at the Points of Interest. After each category on the lists you will find suggestions for books to consult or acquire. You will have to read the on line reviews for apps as that field is developing too rapidly for any other approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaded Lizard
    Beaded lizard PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: NATIVE HABITAT: • Their base color is black and marked with • Beaded lizards are found in a variety of varying amounts of yellow spots or bands, with habitats in Mexico and Guatemala. the exception of “H. alvarezi” which are all • They are most often found in tropical black in color! deciduous forest, but are also found in thorn • The beaded lizards have short tails which are forests, tropical scrubland and pine-oak forest. used to store fat so they can survive during months of estivation (hibernation that occurs DIET: in summer). • They feed primarily on reptile and bird eggs! • They have forked, pink tongues which they use to smell, with the help of a Jacobson’s organ. • They are semi-arboreal, and will climb trees to get into the nests of other animals. • The “beads” all over their body are called osteoderms, and can be seen on their skeleton! • They occasionally prey upon small birds, mammals, frogs, lizards, and insects. • SIZE AND LIFESPAN: • Adult beaded lizards range from 22inch to REPRODUCTION: 36inch in length. • The beaded lizard becomes sexually mature • Their average weight is around 4lbs! at six to eight years and mates between September and October. • Although males are slightly larger than females, the beaded lizards are not sexually • The female lays her clutch of two to 30 eggs dimorphic. between October and December, the clutch hatching the following June or July. • They have a long life span, living 30 years typically but can possibly live to 50 plus years!! • Young lizards are seldom seen. They are believed to spend much of their early lives underground, emerging at two to three years of age after gaining considerable size!! FUN FACTS: • The venom glands of the beaded lizard are modified salivary glands located in the reptile’s lower jaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Monster of the Desert by Guy Belleranti
    Name: __________________________________ Monster of the Desert by Guy Belleranti Imagine a monster with a big head, a powerful bite, strong digging claws, and a forked tongue. The monster is black with yellow or pink scales all over it's body. If you've been to the deserts of southwestern U.S. and northwestern Mexico, you may have seen such an animal, known as the Gila (HEE-la) monster. Growing up to two feet long, it is the largest of all lizards native to the United States. The Gila monster is one of only two venomous lizards living in North America. The other is the similar looking Mexican beaded lizard. Named after Arizona’s Gila River, the colorful Gila monster makes its home in hot, dry, rocky desert landscapes. Despite its scary name the Gila monster is actually a shy animal. It doesn’t bravely leap out at people, spitting venom. Instead, the solitary Gila monster spends most of its time in underground burrows or hiding under rocks. A Gila monster can go for months without eating. How can it do this? Well, it lives on the fat it has stored in its tail and abdomen. The most likely time to see this animal is in the spring when it comes out to hunt for food. While it is nocturnal (coming out at night) for most of the year, the Gila monster does occasionally venture out in the sunshine during the spring months to sun itself on desert rocks. The Gila monster doesn’t consider people food. We’re way too big.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulpes Vulpes) Evolved Throughout History?
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses Environmental Studies Program 2020 TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY? Abigail Misfeldt University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Disclaimer: The following thesis was produced in the Environmental Studies Program as a student senior capstone project. Misfeldt, Abigail, "TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY?" (2020). Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses. 283. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses/283 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY? By Abigail Misfeldt A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The University of Nebraska-Lincoln In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Science Major: Environmental Studies Under the Supervision of Dr. David Gosselin Lincoln, Nebraska November 2020 Abstract Red foxes are one of the few creatures able to adapt to living alongside humans as we have evolved. All humans and wildlife have some id of relationship, be it a friendly one or one of mutual hatred, or simply a neutral one. Through a systematic research review of legends, books, and journal articles, I mapped how humans and foxes have evolved together.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Consumption of Sockeye Salmon by Brown Bears: Patterns of Partial Consumption, Scavenging, and Implications for Fisheries Management
    Selective consumption of sockeye salmon by brown bears: patterns of partial consumption, scavenging, and implications for fisheries management Alexandra E. Lincoln A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Washington 2019 Committee: Thomas P. Quinn Aaron J. Wirsing Ray Hilborn Trevor A. Branch Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington ©Copyright 2019 Alexandra E. Lincoln University of Washington Abstract Selective consumption of sockeye salmon by brown bears: patterns of partial consumption, scavenging, and implications for fisheries management Alexandra E. Lincoln Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Thomas P. Quinn School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences Animal foraging requires a series of complex decisions that ultimately end with consumption of resources. The extent of consumption varies among consumers, including predator-prey systems; some predators always completely consume their prey but others may partially consume prey that are too large to be completely consumed, or consume only parts of smaller prey and discard the remains. Partial consumption of prey may allow predators to maximize energy intake through selectively feeding on energy-rich tissue, as is observed in bears (Ursus spp.) selectively feeding on Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). Here, we examined selective and partial consumption of sockeye salmon (O. nerka) by brown bears (U. arctos) in western Alaska. First, we tested a series of hypotheses to determine what factors best explain why some salmon are killed and abandoned without tissue consumption, and what tissues are consumed from the salmon that are fed upon. We found that a foraging strategy consistent with energy maximization best explained patterns of selective prey discard and partial consumption, as traits of the fish itself (size, sex, and condition) and the broader foraging opportunities (availability of salmon as prey) were important.
    [Show full text]
  • Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, Nighthawks and Whip-Poor-Wills Present Atlas Surveyors with Several Challenges
    Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, nighthawks and Whip-poor-wills present atlas surveyors with several challenges. Although many Minnesota species, including thrushes and marsh birds, may vocalize at sunset, pre-dawn, or even at night, most can be detected during early morning and daytime surveys. The surveyor’s chances of detecting most owls, however, as well as the common nighthawk and whip-poor-will, will be considerably enhanced by adding nocturnal surveys. Owls Minnesota’s 11 owl species are a mix of permanent, non-migratory residents (Eastern Screech Owl, Great Horned Owl and Barred Owl); summer residents (Long-eared Owl, Short-eared Owl, and Saw-whet Owl) and three species whose summer populations probably include both permanent residents and migratory invaders (Boreal Owl, Northern Hawk Owl and Great Gray Owl). The Burrowing Owl is an extremely rare summer resident in the western grassland region and the Barn Owl has been an erratic species whose status as a permanent resident or migratory invader is unknown. Three of these species tend to be more diurnal and the chances of seeing them during the day are relatively good. They include two open habitat species, the Short-eared Owl and Burrowing Owl, and one forest species, the Northern Hawk Owl. Like marsh hawks, Short- eared Owls can often be seen flying low over wet grasslands and marshes hunting for prey during the morning and early evening hours. The Burrowing Owl, a very rare nesting species in the state, is prominent as it stands as a sentinel atop its nesting burrow, just inches above the surrounding grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Nighthawk Chordeiles Minor
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2018 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2018. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 50 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2007. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 25 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Andrew Gregg Horn for writing the status report on Common Nighthawk, Chordeiles minor, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Richard Elliot, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Birds Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur L’engoulevent d’Amérique (Chordeiles minor) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Common Nighthawk, copyright by Ronnie d'Entremont. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2018. Catalogue No. CW69-14/515-2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-27850-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2018 Common name Common Nighthawk Scientific name Chordeiles minor Status Special Concern Reason for designation This aerial insectivore is a widespread breeding bird across southern and boreal Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico
    Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico. 2006 Annual Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Farmington and Taos Field Offices New Mexico Prepared by: Hawks Aloft, Inc. P.O. Box 10028 Albuquerque, NM 87184 (505) 828-9455 E-mail: [email protected] Golden Eagle and Raptor Surveys, Farmington and Taos Field Offices, 2005 20 December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Distribution and reproductive success for Golden Eagles on BLM Administered Land in San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba, and Sandoval Counties, New Mexico. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................2 Study areas .......................................................................................................................................3 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................3 Results ..............................................................................................................................................5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................7 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Lakes Steward
    Highland Lakes Steward HIGHLAND LAKES CHAPTER July 2015 Volume 6, Issue 7 MISSION by Cris Faught The Texas Master PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Naturalist program is come and go many times instead of stay- a natural resource- Can you identify this animal? ing for an extended time. My feeder is based volunteer train- 1. Omnivore. ing and development within easy sight and sound of the front 2. Lives in close proximity to you. program sponsored porch, and they never seemed to mind 3. Range up to 4500 acres in rural statewide by Texas us looking at or talking about them. A&M AgriLife Exten- areas. These are wild though, so they know sion and the Texas 4. Has a reputation for being very Parks and Wildlife what boundaries are and closely smart. Department. watched us to monitor any infractions of 5. Has an average of six siblings and The mission of the their safety lines. They can make over program is to develop lives up to 12 years. 40 sounds including yips, howls and a corps of well- 6. Can't fly but can climb. informed volunteers growls. The one I heard sounded who provide educa- Ok, no big surprise, but the fox is an enough like a scream or a raven call that tion, outreach, and amazing animal to have around, as you I knew I was being warned to come no service dedicated to know, if you have ever had the oppor- the beneficial manage- closer. I didn't. tunity to watch them. I had the pleasure ment of natural re- The next time you see their boundary of watching a pair of red foxes feed at my sources and natural marker or their playful antics, I hope you areas within their sunflower seed feeder on several occa- will stay long enough to observe them in communities for the sions and they are amazing! state of Texas action.
    [Show full text]