Teaching Robotics at the Primary School: an Innovative Approach David Scaradozzia, Laura Sorbia*, Anna Pedalea,B, Mariantonietta Valzanoc, Cinzia Verginec

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Teaching Robotics at the Primary School: an Innovative Approach David Scaradozzia, Laura Sorbia*, Anna Pedalea,B, Mariantonietta Valzanoc, Cinzia Verginec Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 ( 2015 ) 3838 – 3846 INTE 2014 Teaching robotics at the primary school: an innovative approach David Scaradozzia, Laura Sorbia*, Anna Pedalea,b, Mariantonietta Valzanoc, Cinzia c Vergine aDipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131, Ancona, Italy bNational Instruments Italy, Centro Direzionale Milanofiori Nord, Palazzo U4, Via del Bosco Rinnovato, 8, 20090, Assago (MI), Italy cIstituto Comprensivo Largo Cocconi, Laro Girolamo Cocconi, 10, Roma, Italy Abstract Many researchers and teachers agree that the inclusion of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math in early education provides a strong motivation and a great improvement in learning speed. Most curricula in primary schools include a number of concepts that cover science and math, but less effort is applied in teaching problem solving, computer science, technology and robotics. The use of robotic systems and the introduction of Robotics as a curricula subject can bring the possibility of transmit to children the basics of technology and to give them other kind of human and organizational values. This work present a new program introduced in an Italian primary school thanks to the collaboration with National Instrument and Università Politecnica delle Marche. The subject of Robotics becomes part of the Primary school curricula for all the five years of formation. The program has allowed the teachers training and a complete way through which children have demonstrated great learning abilities, not only in mere technology but also in collaboration and teamwork. © 20152014 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by by Elsevier Elsevier Ltd. Ltd This. is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Peerhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-review under responsibility of the Sakarya). University. Peer-review under responsibility of the Sakarya University Keywords: Robotics, primary schools, innovative program. 1. Introduction Many researchers have been investigating the use of robots to support education. Studies have shown that robots can help students develop problem-solving abilities and learn computer programming, mathematics, and science. The educational approach based mainly on developing logic and creativity in new generations since the first stage of * Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 338-5995438 E-mail address: [email protected] 1877-0428 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the Sakarya University doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1122 David Scaradozzi et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 ( 2015 ) 3838 – 3846 3839 education is very promising. To these aims, the use of robotic systems is becoming fundamental if applied since the earlier stage of education. In primary schools, robot programming is fun and therefore represent an excellent tool for both introducing to ICT and helping the development of children’s logical and linguistic abilities of children. Robotic teaching experiences have been carried out in Italian schools since 2000-2001, when the first project was proposed. It was called “Building a robot” and its description can be found in [Merlo, 2010]. Moreover, learning robots programming also becomes an opportunity for primary school pupils for developing their linguistic and logical skills, always focusing on pedagogical rather than technological issues. This paper presents an innovative program developed in order to teach robotic basics at the primary school as a curricula subject. The same instruments are used as a multidisciplinary validation and motivation for other subjects (Italian, Mathematics, Science, etc…). Education in Italy is compulsory from 6 to 16 years of age and is divided into five stages: kindergarten (scuola dell'infanzia), primary school (scuola primaria), lower secondary school (scuola secondaria di primo grado or scuola media), upper secondary school (scuola secondaria di secondo grado or scuola superiore) and university (università). The Scuola primaria (primary school), also known as “scuola elementare”, is commonly preceded by three years of non-compulsory nursery school (or kindergarten, "asilo"). Scuola elementare lasts five years. Until middle school, the educational curriculum is the same for all pupils: although one can attend a private or state-funded school, the studied subjects are the same. The principal subject are Italian, English, Mathematics, Natural Sciences, History, Geography, Social Studies, Physical Education and Visual and Musical arts. Until 2004, pupils had to pass an exam to access Scuola secondaria di primo grado (Middle school), during which they had to demonstrate their abilities in composing a short Italian essay, passing a Math test and an oral test regarding all the other subjects. The exam has been abolished, only private primary schools legally recognized maintains this kind of test. In order to introduce Robotics as subject during the Prinary school five years, a special program has been introduced. The global five-years schedule is divided into two main blocks: during the first two years pupils are introduced to logics and mechanical feel with remotely controlled independent machine (using Lego WeDo system); in the last three years childrens are asked to design, build and program their own independent robots, using Lego NXT system. The LEGO Education WeDo is an easy-to-use robotics platform that introduces young students to hands-on learning through LEGO bricks and the easiest form of graphical programming software that National Instruments has to offer. It is a fun and simple way to get younger students exposed to basic engineering concepts at an early age. The use of LEGO Education WeDo provides a hands-on learning experience that actively engages children’s creative thinking, teamwork, and problem-solving skills. LEGO Education WeDo is a hands-on platform that primary school students can use to build simple robotics applications driven by a personal computer with a simplified version of LabVIEW. By combining the intuitive and interactive interface of LEGO Education WeDo software with the physical experience of building models out of LEGO bricks, students can bridge the physical and virtual worlds to provide the ultimate hands-on, minds-on learning experience ([LabVIEW Graphical System Design]). The system has being applied in other countries, proposing their use in primary schools and studying the possible benefits for children education. In [Mayerovà, 2012], for example, the author analyzes the first-contact situation in which 3rd grade pupils in primary school encounter LEGO WeDo for the first time. In [Romero, 2012], a pilot study of robotics in primary schools is described, together with motivation of choosing The LEGO WeDo for children activities: the low learning curve of the programming language (visual programming rather than code writing), and the educational content provided with it. Recent years have seen the development of cooperation between National Instruments, Università Politecnica delle Marche and primary schools to improve the use of new technologies since the first grade of the school. One of them is Primary School Istituto Comprensivo Largo Cocconi. Both the scientific and educational communities recognize the role of ICT company investment in improving science and engineering education, engaging students with technology, and equipping educators with resources to help them teach fundamental engineering concepts in a fun, hands-on way. Specifically, the National Instruments and Lego provide interactive, real world learning experiences; low-cost and free training opportunities; a strong global mentorship program; technology and funding. 3840 David Scaradozzi et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 ( 2015 ) 3838 – 3846 Initiatives such as K12Lab.com for primary and secondary school teachers and the NI courseware portal for university professors feature effective content that educators can use directly or adapt to their learning environments [http://k12lab.com]. The K12Lab is a website where teachers can browse and share lesson plans, find inspiration from what others are accomplishing with technology, and get tools and support to help their students connect theory to reality faster. K12Lab users gained access and contributed to a growing library of 86 lesson plans for subject areas such as physics, robotics, and computer science.. The Austin Children’s Museum (ACM) creates innovative learning experiences for children that equip and inspire them to be the next generation of creative problem solvers. The ACM program, TechReach, provides students from low-income families with opportunities to gain hands-on science, technology, engineering, and math skills. Working with LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT kits, participants learn the basics of designing, building, and programming robots. The TechReach program addresses a three-fold problem for economically disadvantaged children in Austin: shortage of access to technology, the need to build 21st century skills, and the lack of interest and awareness in a science-related future [9, 10]. Another interesting experience could be found in the Lana Stone, a technology instructor, with the Govalle Primary school team partecipation on the FIRST LEGO League. National Instruments
Recommended publications
  • Using Robotics to Equip K-12 Teachers: Silicon Prairie Initiative for Robotics in Information Technology (Spirit)
    AC 2009-2198: USING ROBOTICS TO EQUIP K-12 TEACHERS: SILICON PRAIRIE INITIATIVE FOR ROBOTICS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SPIRIT) Alisa Gilmore, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Alisa N. Gilmore, P.E. is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Computer and Electronics Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She serves as senior technical staff for two NSF grants in the ITEST and Discovery K-12 programs associated with using robotics in the K-12 arena to motivate student achievement in STEM activities. She has been involved as a community outreach speaker, presenter, and collaborator with local schools, students, and teachers for over ten years, working to expose pre-college students to engineering. Ms. Gilmore has extensive industrial experience in the telecommunications and manufacturing areas, and since 2003 has used her industry background to foster industrial partnerships at the university and to develop and teach courses in circuits, telecommunications, and robotics. Bing Chen, UNL Dr. Bing Chen is chairman of the Department of Computer and Electronics Engineering on the Omaha campus of the College of Engineering, University of Nebraska - Lincoln at the Peter Kiewit Institute. He is the Principal Investigator on three NSF grants involving levels K-16 in educational robotics. His primary interest involves providing a continuous exposure to students with educational robotics both within a classroom environment and in after school settings year round to stimulate student creativity and possible pursuit of STEM careers in order to meet national long term needs and global challenges posed by competitive engineering programs overseas. His other long term research interest has been in the area of renewable energy.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the NASA Robotics Alliance Cadets Program
    Session F An Introduction to the NASA Robotics Alliance Cadets Program David R. Schneider, Clare van den Blink NASA, DAVANNE, & Cornell University / Cornell University CIT [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The 2006 report National Defense Education and Innovation Initiative highlighted this nation’s growing need to revitalize undergraduate STEM education. In response, NASA has partnered with the DAVANNE Corporation to create the NASA Robotics Alliance Cadets Program to develop innovative, highly integrated and interactive curriculum to redesign the first two years of Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. This paper introduces the NASA Cadets Program and provides insight into the skill areas targeted by the program as well as the assessment methodology for determining the program’s effectiveness. The paper also offers a brief discussion on the capabilities of the program’s robotic platform and a justification for its design into the program. As an example of the integration of the robotic platform with the program’s methodologies, this paper concludes by outlining one of the first educational experiments of NASA Cadets Program at Cornell University to be implemented in the Spring 2007 semester. I. Introduction To be an engineer is to be a designer, a creator of new technology, and the everyday hero that solves society’s problems through innovative methods and products by making ideas become a reality. However, the opportunity to truly explore these key concepts of being an engineer are often withheld from most incoming engineering students until at least their junior year causing many new students to lose motivation and potentially leave the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanoid Robots (Figures 41, 42)
    A Roboethics Framework for the Development and Introduction of Social Assistive Robots in Elderly Care Antonio M. M. C. Espingardeiro Salford Business School University of Salford, Manchester, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 - Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 - Literature review ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1. Ethics in the digital world ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2. Exploratory work in roboethics ..................................................................................................................... 14 2.2. Roboethics rules and guidance ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.3. “In-situ” practical workshops with SARs ........................................................................................................ 23 2.4. Summary ........................................................................................................................................................ 24 Chapter 3 - Human robotics interactions and ethical principles .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using Fluid Power Workshops to Increase Stem Interest in K-12 Students
    Paper ID #10577 Using fluid power workshops to increase STEM interest in K-12 students Dr. Jose M Garcia, Purdue University (Statewide Technology) Assistant Professor Engineering Technology Mr. Yury Alexandrovich Kuleshov, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. John H. Lumkes Dr. John Lumkes is an associate professor in agricultural and biological engineering at Purdue University. He earned a BS in engineering from Calvin College, an MS in engineering from the University of Michi- gan, and a PhD in mechanical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research focus is in the area of machine systems and fluid power. He is the advisor of a Global Design Team operating in Bangang, Cameroon, concentrating on affordable, sustainable utility transportation for rural villages in Africa. Page 24.1330.1 Page c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 USING FLUID POWER WORKSHOPS TO INCREASE STEM INTEREST IN K-12 STUDENTS 1. Abstract This study addresses the issue of using robotics in K-12 STEM education. The authors applied intrinsic motivation theory to measure participant perceptions during a series of robotic workshops for K-12 students at Purdue University. A robotic excavator arm using fluid power components was developed and tested as a tool to generate interest in STEM careers. Eighteen workshops were held with a total number of 451 participants. Immediately after the workshop, participants were provided with a questionnaire that included both quantitative and qualitative questions. Fourteen of the questions are quantitative, where a participant would characterize their after-workshop experience using a 1 to 7- Likert scale. According to the intrinsic motivation theory it was hypothesized that participant perceptions should differ depending on their gender, race, and age.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Robotics Into First-Year Experience Courses Tyson S
    Southern Adventist University KnowledgeExchange@Southern Faculty Works School of Computing 4-2011 Integrating Robotics into First-Year Experience Courses Tyson S. Hall Southern Adventist University, [email protected] P. Willard Munger Southern Adventist University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/facworks_comp Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, and the Robotics Commons Recommended Citation T. S. Hall and P. W. Munger, “Integrating robotics into first-year experience courses,” in Proc. 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Southeastern Section Annual Meeting, Charleston, GA, April 2011. This Conference Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Computing at KnowledgeExchange@Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of KnowledgeExchange@Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Integrating Robotics into First-Year Experience Courses Tyson S. Hall1 and P. Willard Munger2 Abstract – Robotics are a popular component of many introductory engineering and computer science courses. At Southern Adventist University, the School of Computing faculty decided to integrate robotics into a discipline- specific section of the University’s first-year experience course. The integration of robotics into a first-year experience course has created a hands-on introduction to college life within the Computing discipline while introducing students to the problem-solving process. This paper will introduce a very low-cost robotic platform kit ($50-75) that has been developed for the first-year experience course. Student assessment data from the first offering of this course with the SouthernBot 2.0 kit shows that overall, students were engaged in the open-ended design projects completed during the building of the robot platform.
    [Show full text]
  • The Robotic Autonomy Mobile Robotics Course: Robot Design, Curriculum Design and Educational Assessment
    The Robotic Autonomy Mobile Robotics Course: Robot Design, Curriculum Design and Educational Assessment Illah R. Nourbakhsha, Kevin Crowleyb, Ajinkya Bhavea, Emily Hamnera, Thomas Hsiuc, Andres Perez-Bergquista, Steve Richardsd, Katie Wilkinsonb a The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 b Learning Research and Development Ctr, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 c Gogoco, LLC. Sunnyvale, CA 94086 d Acroname, Inc. Boulder, CO 80303 Abstract Robotic Autonomy is a seven-week, hands-on introduction to robotics designed for high school students. The course presents a broad survey of robotics, beginning with mechanism and electronics and ending with robot behavior, navigation and remote teleoperation. During the summer of 2002, Robotic Autonomy was taught to twenty eight students at Carnegie Mellon West in cooperation with NASA/Ames (Moffett Field, CA). The educational robot and course curriculum were the result of a ground-up design effort chartered to develop an effective and low-cost robot for secondary level education and home use. Cooperation between Carnegie Mellon’s Robotics Institute, Gogoco, LLC. and Acroname Inc. yielded notable innovations including a fast-build robot construction kit, indoor/outdoor terrainability, CMOS vision-centered sensing, back-EMF motor speed control and a Java-based robot programming interface. In conjunction with robot and curriculum design, the authors at the Robotics Institute and the University of Pittsburgh’s Learning Research and Development Center planned a methodology for evaluating the educational efficacy of Robotic Autonomy, implementing both formative and summative evaluations of progress as well as an in- depth, one week ethnography to identify micro-genetic mechanisms of learning that would inform the broader evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Astra Robotics - Rvce
    ASTRA ROBOTICS - RVCE Who are we? “Astra robotics” is the robotics chapter of RV College of Engineering. We actively participate in the various robotics events held across the globe. We focus on robotics and technology to boost innovation for a better tomorrow. We aim to create a platform for research and development in the field of robotics and automation to solve conundrums in the most economical and elementary ways. We consider ourselves a socially responsible club. We believe in sharing our knowledge and sharing the benefits of technology with the world. Mission & Vision We provide a platform for Interdisciplinary research and innovation in the field of robotics, with a focus on development of sustainable technology. We work towards developing next generation robots and incorporating the principles of Opportunistic and Experiential learning. Perspective We have been a platform for providing insight into the world of Robotics and encouraging students to pursue their interests in it. We being a socially responsible club have conducted various Robotics workshops in and outside Bangalore to develop interests among students in the field of Robotics. The students were taught basics of electronics, arduino and how to make a line follower. Teams were given kits to develop the bots that comprised of motors, chassis, arduino, cable, breadboard and others. The amount raised from conducting workshop is used for funding the student club. We have also conducted many classes during summer for the students of our college about basics of Raspberry Pi and Internet of Things. We have also done many minor projects during summer which are very innovative.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Mobile Robotic Platforms for Teaching Computer Science at African Universities
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Lincoln Institutional Repository Affordable Mobile Robotic Platforms for Teaching Computer Science at African Universities Ernest B.B. Gyebi, Marc Hanheide and Grzegorz Cielniak School of Computer Science University of Lincoln, UK Email: fegyebi,mhanheide,[email protected] Abstract—Educational robotics can play a key role in ad- importance of existing knowledge, conceptions and varied dressing some of the challenges faced by higher education in learning styles. In robotics, learners are invited to work on Africa. One of the major obstacles preventing a wider adoption experiments or problem solving with selective use of available of initiatives involving educational robotics in this part of the world is lack of robots that would be affordable by African resources, according to their own interests, search and learning institutions. In this paper, we present a survey and analysis of strategies [7]. currently available affordable mobile robots and their suitability for teaching computer science at African universities. To this In this paper, we are looking at one of the key challenges end, we propose a set of assessment criteria and review a for adopting robot programming in the curricula of African number of platforms costing an order of magnitude less than universities: identifying robotic platforms which are suitable the existing popular educational robots. Our analysis identifies for education purposes in computer science and at the same suitable candidates offering contrasting features and benefits. We time are affordable. Affordability has to be seen differently also discuss potential issues and promising directions which can be considered by both educators in Africa but also designers and than normally looked at in developed countries: for example, manufacturers of future robot platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Microrobotics by Metin Sitti
    MOBILE MICROROBOTICS Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents Edited by Ronald C. Arkin A complete list of the books in the Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents series appears at the back of this book. MOBILE MICROROBOTICS Metin Sitti The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England c 2017 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Times Roman by the author. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: Names: Sitti, Metin, author. Title: Mobile microrobotics / Metin Sitti. Description: Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, [2017] | Series: Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016047358 | ISBN 9780262036436 (hardcover : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Microrobots. | Mobile robots. Classification: LCC TJ211.36 .S57 2017 | DDC 629.8/932 – dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016047358 10987654321 To the beautiful memories of my beloved sister, brain surgeon, Ilkay˙ Sitti whom we lost so young and so unexpectedly Acknowledgments This book could never be possible without the love and support of my beloved wife Seyhan and daughters, Ada and Doga.˘ They have made my life always more beautiful and meaningful. In addition to them, I have been so lucky and happy that my parents and two sisters have loved and supported me uncondi- tionally all the time. My father has been a role model for me as a person and an intellectual with many ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • Programming Human-Robot Interactions in Middle School: the Role of Mobile Input Modalities in Embodied Learning
    Programming Human-Robot Interactions in Middle School: The Role of Mobile Input Modalities in Embodied Learning Alexandros Merkouris Department of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece [email protected] Konstantinos CHorianopoulos Department of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece [email protected] Abstract—Embodiment witHin robotics can serve as an innovative approacH to attracting students to computer programming. NevertHeless, tHere is a limited number of empirical studies in autHentic classroom environments to support tHis assumption. In tHis study, we explored tHe synergy between embodied learning and educational robotics tHrougH a series of programming activities. THirty-six middle scHool students were asked to create applications for controlling a robot using diverse interaction modalities, such as touch, speecH, hand and full body gestures. We measured students’ preferences, views, and intentions. Further- more, we evaluated students’ interaction modalities selections during a semi- open problem-solving task. The results revealed that students felt more confident about tHeir programming skills after tHe activities. Moreover, participants cHose interfaces that were attractive to them and congruent to tHe programming tasks. Keywords—embodied learning, educational robotics, experiment, cHildren, Hu- man-robot interaction 1 Introduction Robotic computing Has been proposed as an inspiring framework for getting students involved witH STEM disciplines as well as witH programming [4]. In most studies con- ducted on the use of educational robotics in scHools, cHildren are asked to enliven tHe robots by creating the appropriate computer programs [5]. THe programmer Has to tHink mainly about the goal of the robot and How the robot will interact witH tHe environment. However, there is anotHer crucial aspect that should also be considered, and tHis is if and How tHe user will interact with tHe robot.
    [Show full text]