RP2 Phenotype and Pathogenetic Correlations in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OPHTHALMIC MOLECULAR GENETICS SECTION EDITOR: JANEY L. WIGGS, MD, PhD RP2 Phenotype and Pathogenetic Correlations in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Thiran Jayasundera, MD; Kari E. H. Branham, MS; Mohammad Othman, PhD; William R. Rhoades, BS; Athanasios J. Karoukis, BS; Hemant Khanna, PhD; Anand Swaroop, PhD; John R. Heckenlively, MD Objectives: To assess the phenotype of patients with function. All 3 female carriers had macular atrophy in 1 X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) with RP2 muta- or both eyes and were myopic (mean, −6.23 D). All 9 non- tions and to correlate the findings with their genotype. sense and frameshift and 5 of 7 missense mutations (71%) resulted in severe clinical presentations. Methods: Six hundred eleven patients with RP were screened for RP2 mutations. From this screen, 18 pa- Conclusions: Screening of the RP2 gene should be pri- tients with RP2 mutations were evaluated clinically with oritized in patients younger than 16 years characterized standardized electroretinography, Goldmann visual fields, by X-linked inheritance, decreased best-corrected vi- and ocular examinations. In addition, 7 well-docu- sual acuity (eg, Ͼ20/40), high myopia, and early-onset mented cases from the literature were used to augment macular atrophy. Patients exhibiting a choroideremia- genotype-phenotype correlations. like fundus without choroideremia gene mutations should also be screened for RP2 mutations. Results: Of 11 boys younger than 12 years, 10 (91%) had macular involvement and 9 (82%) had best- Clinical Relevance: An identifiable phenotype for corrected visual acuity worse than 20/50. Two boys from RP2-XLRP aids in clinical diagnosis and targeted genetic different families (aged 8 and 12 years) displayed a cho- roideremia-like fundus, and 9 boys (82%) were myopic screening. (mean error, −7.97 diopters [D]). Of 10 patients with elec- troretinography data, 9 demonstrated severe rod-cone dys- Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(7):915-923 ETINITIS PIGMENTOSA (RP) IS tor and is involved in cellular transport regu- a clinically and genetically lation mechanisms.18 Although the 30 heterogeneous group of amino-terminal residues of RP2 are criti- retinal disorders that causes cal for binding to Arl3, human disease- progressive loss of visual causing mutations Arg118His and Rfunction due to rod and cone photorecep- Glu138Gly also reduce the affinity of RP2 tor degeneration. The X-linked forms of to Arl3, indicating a clinically relevant as- RP (XLRP) account for 10% to 20% of all sociation elsewhere in the protein. Post- RP cases.1-3 Two genes have been cloned translational acyl modifications at the N- for XLRP: retinitis pigmentosa GTPase terminus of RP2 act to target the protein to regulator, RPGR (OMIM 312610),4 and the plasma membrane, and disruption of 5,6 Author Affiliations: RP2 (OMIM 312600), which together ac- this acylation site ultimately leads to the RP 7-10 19,20 Department of Ophthalmology count for more than 80% of XLRP. phenotype. Most pathogenic sequence and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Mutations in RP2 are reported to cause alterations found in RP2 represent truncat- Eye Center (Drs Jayasundera, 7% to 10% of XLRP.6,11-15 The RP2 gene is ing mutations.11 However, missense mu- Othman, Khanna, Swaroop, and composed of 5 exons and encodes a widely tations have been located in the cofactor Heckenlively; Ms Branham; and expressed protein of 350 amino acids.6,16 The C–like domain of RP2.17 Messrs Rhoades and Karoukis), RP2 protein consists of an amino-terminal Given the considerable phenotypic and and Department of Human domain with homology to cofactor C and genetic heterogeneity associated with Genetics (Dr Swaroop), a carboxyl-terminal domain with homol- XLRP14 and the scarcity of patients with RP2 University of Michigan, 17 Ann Arbor; and Neurobiology, ogy to nucleoside diphosphate kinase. The diagnoses, there has been insufficient in- Neurodegeneration, and Repair amino-terminal domain of RP2 binds to a formation to date to predict the clinical Laboratory, National Institutes small guanosine triphosphate–binding pro- phenotype of a patient based on the RP2 mu- of Health, Bethesda, Maryland tein, Arl3, which shows homology with tation. Although there have been stud- (Dr Swaroop). adenosine diphosphate–ribosylation fac- ies9,12,14,21 containing correlations of RP2 phe- (REPRINTED) ARCH OPHTHALMOL / VOL 128 (NO. 7), JULY 2010 WWW.ARCHOPHTHALMOL.COM 915 ©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/26/2021 Table 1. Mutations for Families Included in This Study Family Type of Protein Severity of Associated Predicted Effect of Mutation No. Location Mutation Nucleotide Change Changea Phenotype on Protein16,17,19,20 Mutations From the University of Michigan Cohort 1090 Exon 1 Missense c.8GϾC p.Cys3Serb Less severe Mislocalization of protein 148 Exon 1 Insertion/frameshift c.77insCA p.Gln26fs11 Severe Loss of function 1015 Intron 1 Splice IVS1ϩ1GϾA Spliceb Severe Loss of function 528 Intron 1 Splice IVS1ϩ3AϾG Splice14 Severe Loss of function 951 Exon 2 Missense c.260CϾT p.Thr87Ileb Less severe Protein alteration 933 Exon 2 Missense c.352CϾT p.Arg118Cys21 Severe Protein alteration 944 Exon 2 Missense c.353GϾA p.Arg118His6 Severe Protein alteration 948 Exon 2 Missense c.353GϾA p.Arg118His6 Severe Protein alteration 652 Exon 2 Deletion c.409-411delATT p.Ile137del12 Severe Protein instability 1029 Exon 2 Nonsense c.450GϾA p.Trp150Stop27 Severe (carrier) Loss of function 971 Exon 2 Insertion/frameshift c.515_516insG p.Ser172fsTer17314 Severe Loss of function 548 Exon 2 Insertion/frameshift c.673-674insC p.R225fsTer23414 Severe Loss of function 1167 Exon 2 Missense c.758TϾC p.Leu253Prob Severe Protein instability Mutations From Published Cases in the Literature Case 122 Exon 1 Deletion c.12_18 del p.Ser6del6 Less severe Mislocalization of protein Case 222 Exon 1 Nonsense c.76CϾT p.Gln26Stop6 Severe Loss of function Case 323 Exon 2 Nonsense c.358CϾT p.Arg120Stop13 Severe Loss of function Case 424 Exon 2 Nonsense c.358CϾT p.Arg120Stop13 Severe Loss of function Case 525 Exon 2 Nonsense c.358CϾT p.Arg120Stop13 Severe Loss of function Case 626 Exon 2 Missense c.758TϾG p.Leu253Arg26 Severe Protein instability Case 717 Exon 2 Deletion/frameshift c.798delGACA p.Gln266fs21 Severe Loss of function a References cited in this column denote the first mention of the change in the literature. b Novel change. notypes with visual function data, no large study exists, to individual identification number (ie, family number-indi- our knowledge, in which clear clinical distinctions have been vidual number). identified to help make it a recognizable entity to ophthal- A comprehensive literature search was performed to iden- mologists. A recognizable phenotype would help narrow tify publications containing unambiguous and adequate de- the differential diagnosis for candidate gene mutational scriptions of clinical features (age at symptom onset, visual func- tion, electroretinography data, and retinal appearance) of screening for RP2. We undertook the present study to care- individual patients with RP2 mutations. Data on the 7 identi- fully analyze the phenotype in a cohort of patients with RP2 fied cases were collected from the literature for inclusion and and carriers found at our institution and in previously pub- comparison to supplement the cohort from our institution to lished articles (Table 1). We correlated the severity of dis- delineate the phenotype of RP2 and make genotype to pheno- ease with the predicted effect of the mutation on the pu- type correlations (Table 1). tative function of RP2. DNA EXTRACTION METHODS DNA was extracted from the whole blood of patients. Primers for amplifying RP2 exons 2-5 were used as previously PATIENTS reported.6 The sequences for the RP2 exon 1 forward and reverse primers were 5Ј CTTTGATTGGCTCAACAGGC and Mutational analysis was performed on 611 DNA samples as part 5Ј GTTCAAGAGAGTGCGGCAG, respectively. These prim- of a larger screening study from the XLRP Repository of the ers amplified 447–base pair polymerase chain reaction (PCR) University of Michigan’s Center for Retinal and Macular De- fragments. generation (outside samples not reported). Samples from pa- tients affected with a probable or possible diagnosis of XLRP PCR CONDITIONS AND SEQUENCING or X-linked cone-rod dystrophy (as described by Breuer et al14) were screened for variations and mutations in the RP2 gene. DNA was used at approximately 100 ng per PCR. All the ex- Mutational analysis was performed as described by Mears et ons except exon 2 were amplified with Ex Taq Polymerase al11 (n=51), by Breuer et al14 (n=234), or herein (n=326). (TaKaRa Bio Inc, Shiga, Japan). Exon 2 was amplified with Ac- Included in this genotype-phenotype correlation study are cuPrime high-fidelity polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Cali- the 18 patients with previously identified RP2 mutations who fornia). The annealing temperature for exons 1 and 2 was 59°C; were clinically evaluated in the Retinal Dystrophy Clinic at the for exons 3, 4, and 5, it was 64°C. All PCR volumes were made University of Michigan’s Kellogg Eye Center or at the Univer- to 25 µL, and PCR products were run on 2% agarose gels to sity of California, Los Angeles’ Jules Stein Eye Institute. All the verify the sizes and quality of amplification. Before submitting patients gave informed consent, and the research was ap- the samples for sequencing, the DNA concentration was mea- proved by the institutional review board at the University of sured using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 1000; Thermo Sci- Michigan. Patients with only a clinical diagnosis of XLRP with- entific, Wilmington, Delaware). The PCR amplicons were then out documented RP2 mutations were excluded. Patients are iden- diluted (1-3 ng/µL in distilled water) as required by the se- tified throughout with a family identification number and an quencing core at the University of Michigan Medical School. (REPRINTED) ARCH OPHTHALMOL / VOL 128 (NO.