Jim Bridger Coal Mine Complex Mining Plan Modification for Federal Coal Lease WYW-02727

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jim Bridger Coal Mine Complex Mining Plan Modification for Federal Coal Lease WYW-02727 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT For Jim Bridger Coal Mine Complex Mining Plan Modification for Federal Coal Lease WYW-02727 August 2017 Environmental Assessment For Jim Bridger Coal Mine Complex Mining Plan Modification for Federal Coal Lease WYW-02727 United States Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement August 2017 Jim Bridger Coal Mine Complex Mining Plan Modification for Federal Coal Lease WYW-02727 Environmental Assessment CONTENTS Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................... v 1. Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Background .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1. Statutory and Regulatory Background ................................................................................... 4 1.3. Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.4. Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, and Other Agency Plans .................................................... 5 1.4.1. Statutes and Regulations ........................................................................................................ 5 1.4.2. Other Agency Plans................................................................................................................ 6 1.5. Authorizing Actions ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.6. Scoping, Outreach, and Issues Identification ................................................................................. 7 2. Proposed Action and Alternatives ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1. Existing Operations at Bridger Mine Complex ...................................................................... 8 2.2. Description of Alternatives .......................................................................................................... 17 2.2.1. Proposed Action ................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.2. No Action Alternative .......................................................................................................... 24 2.2.3. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ........................................ 25 3. Affected Environment ...................................................................................................................... 27 3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 27 3.2. General Setting ............................................................................................................................. 29 3.3. Air Quality and Climate Change .................................................................................................. 29 3.3.1. Local Climate and Meteorology ........................................................................................... 29 3.3.2. Air Quality ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.3. Climate Change .................................................................................................................... 40 3.4. Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 41 3.4.1. Cultural Context ................................................................................................................... 41 3.4.2. Known Cultural Resources .................................................................................................. 42 3.4.3. Native American Religious Concerns .................................................................................. 44 3.5. Fish and Wildlife .......................................................................................................................... 44 3.5.1. Common Wildlife ................................................................................................................ 44 3.5.2. Big Game ............................................................................................................................. 45 3.5.3. Migratory Birds, including Raptors ..................................................................................... 49 3.5.4. Fish ....................................................................................................................................... 51 3.6. Geology and Minerals .................................................................................................................. 51 3.6.1. Geology ................................................................................................................................ 51 3.6.2. Minerals ............................................................................................................................... 54 3.7. Socioeconomics ............................................................................................................................ 54 3.7.1. Population ............................................................................................................................ 55 3.7.2. Employment and Income ..................................................................................................... 55 3.7.3. Housing ................................................................................................................................ 55 3.7.4. Economy .............................................................................................................................. 56 3.8. Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 57 3.8.1. Soil Mapping Observations .................................................................................................. 57 3.8.2. Baseline Soil Assessment ..................................................................................................... 58 3.9. Topography and Physiography ..................................................................................................... 59 i Jim Bridger Coal Mine Complex Mining Plan Modification for Federal Coal Lease WYW-02727 Environmental Assessment 3.10. Vegetation .................................................................................................................................... 59 3.10.1. Land Cover Mapping Observations ..................................................................................... 59 3.10.2. Baseline Vegetation Assessment .......................................................................................... 61 3.10.3. Invasive Species and Noxious Weeds .................................................................................. 63 3.11. Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 65 3.11.1. Surface Water Resources ..................................................................................................... 65 3.11.2. Groundwater Resources ....................................................................................................... 70 3.12. Wetlands and Riparian Zones ....................................................................................................... 73 3.12.1. Wetlands ............................................................................................................................... 73 3.12.2. Riparian Zones ..................................................................................................................... 74 4. Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................................... 74 4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 74 4.2. Air Quality and Climate Change .................................................................................................. 75 4.2.1. Proposed Action ................................................................................................................... 75 4.2.2. No Action Alternative .......................................................................................................... 80 4.3. Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 80 4.3.1. Proposed Action ................................................................................................................... 80 4.3.2. No Action Alternative .........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • El Género Muhlenbergia
    www.unal.edu.co/icn/publicaciones/caldasia.htm CaldasiaGiraldo-Cañas 31(2):269-302. & Peterson 2009 EL GÉNERO MUHLENBERGIA (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: CYNODONTEAE: MUHLENBERGIINAE) EN COLOMBIA1 The genus Muhlenbergia (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae: Muhlenbergiinae) in Colombia DIEGO GIRALDO-CAÑAS Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Apartado 7495, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. [email protected] PAUL M. PETERSON Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. [email protected] RESUMEN Se presenta un estudio taxonómico de las especies colombianas del género Muhlenbergia. Se analizan diversos aspectos relativos a la clasificación, la nomenclatura y la variación morfológica de los caracteres. El género Muhlenbergia está representado en Colombia por 14 especies. Las especies Aegopogon bryophilus Döll, Aegopogon cenchroides Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd., Lycurus phalaroides Kunth y Pereilema crinitum J. Presl se transfi eren al género Muhlenbergia. El binomio Muhlenbergia cleefi i Lægaard se reduce a la sinonimia de Muhlenbergia fastigiata (J. Presl) Henrard. Las especies Muhlenbergia beyrichiana Kunth, Muhlenbergia ciliata (Kunth) Trin. y Muhlenbergia nigra Hitchc. se excluyen de la fl ora de Colombia. Se presentan las claves para reconocer las especies presentes en Colombia, así como también las descripciones de éstas, sus sinónimos, la distribución geográfi ca, se comentan algunas observaciones morfológicas y ecológicas, los usos y los números cromosómicos. Del tratamiento taxonómico se excluyen las especies Muhlenbergia erectifolia SwallenSwallen [[== Ortachne erectifolia (Swallen)(Swallen) CClayton]layton] y Muhlenbergia wallisii Mez [= Agrostopoa wallisii (Mez) P. M. Peterson, Soreng & Davidse]. Palabras clave. Aegopogon, Lycurus, Muhlenbergia, Pereilema, Chloridoideae, Poaceae, Gramíneas neotropicales, Flora de Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This Is a Consolidated List Of
    RWKiger 26 Jul 18 Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 24 and 25. In citations of articles, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix "a"; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with "b". Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes. Aares, E., M. Nurminiemi, and C. Brochmann. 2000. Incongruent phylogeographies in spite of similar morphology, ecology, and distribution: Phippsia algida and P. concinna (Poaceae) in the North Atlantic region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 220: 241–261. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges. = Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft. Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. = Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica. Acta Horti Bot. Prag. = Acta Horti Botanici Pragensis. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. = Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. [Shokubutsu Bunrui Chiri.] Acta Phytotax.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Invasions in Rhode Island Riparian Zones ✴Paleostratigraphy in B Y S U Z a N N E M
    Volume 12 • Number 2 • November 2005 What’s Inside… Plant Invasions in Rhode Island Riparian Zones ✴Paleostratigraphy in B Y S U Z A N N E M . L U S S I E R A N D S A R A N . D A S I L V A the Campus Freezer ✴Wandering Hooded Riparian zones opportunistic, they are often the first Methods Seals are the corridors plants to colonize disturbed patches of Selecting the Study Sites ✴Bringing Watershed of land adjacent soil and forest edges. Several research- Health and Land to streams, riv- ers have found that riparian zones sup- By using hydrographical and land Use History into the use/land cover data from the Rhode Classroom ers, and other port a greater abundance and diversity Island Geographic Information System ✴ surface waters, of invasive plants than other habitats The Paleozoology (RIGIS, http://www.edc.uri.edu/rigis/), Collection of the which serve as (Brown and Peet 2003, Burke and Museum of Natural transitional areas Grime 1996, Gregory et al. 1991). we characterized eight subwatersheds History, Roger Wil- between terres- by their percentage of residential land liams Park trial and aquatic Streams within urban and suburban use (4–59%). Stream corridors were de- ✴“The Invasives Beat” systems. Their watersheds characteristically carry lineated using orthophotos and verified ✴Bioblitz 2005 vegetation pro- higher nutrient loads following storm with on-site latitude/longitude readings ✴and lots more... vides valuable events as the first flush of overland run- from a Geographic Positioning System wildlife habitat off transports nonpoint-source (nutri- (GPS). We also calculated the edge- while enhancing ent) pollution into the stream corridors to-area ratio for each riparian zone to instream habitat (Burke and Grime 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference
    Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants : UnitedUnited States States DepartmentDepartment ofof Agriculture Agriculture ForestForest Service Service Proceedings of the Fourth RockyRocky Mountain Mountain ResearchResearch Station Station Conference ProceedingsProceedings RMRS-P-48CD RMRS-P-48CD JulyJuly 2007 2007 March 22-26, 2004 Las Cruces, New Mexico Barlow-Irick, P., J.J. AndersonAnderson andand C.C. McDonald,McDonald, techtech eds.eds. 2007.2006. SouthwesternSouthwestern rarerare andand endangered plants: Proceedings of the fourth conference; March 22-26, 2004; Las Cruces, New Mexico. Proceedings RMRS-P-XX.RMRS-P-48CD. Fort Fort Collins, Collins, CO: CO: U.S. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchResearch Station.Station. 135 pp.p. Abstract These contributed papers review the current status of plant conservation in the southwestern U.S. Key Words: plant conservation, conservation partnerships, endangered plants, plant taxonomy, genetics, demography, reproductive biology, biogeography, plant surveys, plant monitoring These manuscripts received technical and statistical review. Views expressed in each paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the sponsoring organizations or the USDA Forest Service. Cover illustration: Have Plant Press, Will Travel by Patricia Barlow-Irick You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media. Please specify the publication title and series number. Fort Collins Service Center Telephone (970) 498-1392 FAX (970) 498-1122 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/rmrs Mailing address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, CO 80526 USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-XXRMRS-P-48CD Southwestern Rare and Endangered Plants: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference March 22-26, 2004 Las Cruces, New Mexico Technical Coordinators: Patricia Barlow-Irick Largo Canyon School Counselor, NM John Anderson U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadow of a Megalopolis, a New Flexamia from a Threatened Grass Species in the New Jersey Pine Barrens (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae, Paralimnini)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 511: 69–79In the (2015) shadow of a megalopolis, a new Flexamia from a threatened grass species... 69 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.511.9572 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research In the shadow of a megalopolis, a new Flexamia from a threatened grass species in the New Jersey Pine Barrens (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae, Paralimnini) Andrew Hicks1 1 University of Colorado, Museum of Natural History, Entomology Section, Boulder, CO USA Corresponding author: Andrew Hicks ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Sanborn | Received 12 March 2015 | Accepted 3 June 2015 | Published 2 July 2015 http://zoobank.org/90D386CE-9F7C-4E3C-8864-EEA264FD7717 Citation: Hicks A (2015) In the shadow of a megalopolis, a new Flexamia from a threatened grass species in the New Jersey Pine Barrens (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae, Paralimnini). ZooKeys 511: 69–79. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.511.9572 Abstract A previously unknown species of the North American leafhopper genus Flexamia, F. whitcombi sp. n., is described from pinebarren smokegrass (Muhlenbergia torreyana (Schult.) Hitchc.), a state-listed threat- ened grass in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. The serrata species group, to which it belongs, is redefined and a key to the species of the group is provided. This is the first reported insect association with M. torreyana. Keywords Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae, leafhopper, Flexamia, new species, Muhlenbergia torreyana, New Jersey Pine Barrens Introduction Flexamia is a charismatic North American leafhopper genus of specialist grass feeders with the species typically feeding upon a single, widespread host species. The hosts they spend their lives on include some of the iconic grasses of the American prairie, range- lands, and deserts, and Flexamia are often described as prairie or grassland leafhoppers.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Geography of Southwestern Sand Dunes
    Plant Geography of Southwestern Sand Dunes Item Type Article Authors Bowers, Janice E. Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 28/09/2021 05:23:00 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552222 Bowers Southwestern Sand Dunes 31 Abstract Plant Geography Patterns of plant distribution among eight dune fields in the southwestern USA and northwestern Mexico are analyzed and discussed. Each dune flora is characterized by three to five geogra- of Southwestern phic components; the regional flora in which each dune field occurs is the dominant component. Endemic species, that is, Sand Dunes species restricted to sand dunes, comprise ten percent or more of five of the eight floras. All possible combinations of the eight dune floras taken two at a time (28 pairs) were analyzed using Sorensen's similarity index. Only seven have a similarity value of 0.200 or Janice E. Bowers greater. The lack of similarity among dune floras is due in part to their distribution among four floristically distinct biogeographic 3949 E. Paseo Dorado provinces and in part to localized recruitment of species from Tucson, AZ 85711 adjacent, non -dune plant communities. Geographic, edaphic and temporal barriers to dispersal and establishment also promote high dissimilarity among the eight floras. Eighty -three of the 533 species composing the eight dune floras are either endemic to sand dunes or occur at three or more of the dune fields studied. These 83 species fall into two subgroups: a group of 36 species characteristic of southwestern sand dunes east of 113° Longitude, and a group of 57 species characteristic of sand dunes west of 113° Longitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora-Lab-Manual.Pdf
    LabLab MManualanual ttoo tthehe Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros Flora of New Mexico Lab Manual to the Flora of New Mexico Jane Mygatt Juliana Medeiros University of New Mexico Herbarium Museum of Southwestern Biology MSC03 2020 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA 87131-0001 October 2009 Contents page Introduction VI Acknowledgments VI Seed Plant Phylogeny 1 Timeline for the Evolution of Seed Plants 2 Non-fl owering Seed Plants 3 Order Gnetales Ephedraceae 4 Order (ungrouped) The Conifers Cupressaceae 5 Pinaceae 8 Field Trips 13 Sandia Crest 14 Las Huertas Canyon 20 Sevilleta 24 West Mesa 30 Rio Grande Bosque 34 Flowering Seed Plants- The Monocots 40 Order Alistmatales Lemnaceae 41 Order Asparagales Iridaceae 42 Orchidaceae 43 Order Commelinales Commelinaceae 45 Order Liliales Liliaceae 46 Order Poales Cyperaceae 47 Juncaceae 49 Poaceae 50 Typhaceae 53 Flowering Seed Plants- The Eudicots 54 Order (ungrouped) Nymphaeaceae 55 Order Proteales Platanaceae 56 Order Ranunculales Berberidaceae 57 Papaveraceae 58 Ranunculaceae 59 III page Core Eudicots 61 Saxifragales Crassulaceae 62 Saxifragaceae 63 Rosids Order Zygophyllales Zygophyllaceae 64 Rosid I Order Cucurbitales Cucurbitaceae 65 Order Fabales Fabaceae 66 Order Fagales Betulaceae 69 Fagaceae 70 Juglandaceae 71 Order Malpighiales Euphorbiaceae 72 Linaceae 73 Salicaceae 74 Violaceae 75 Order Rosales Elaeagnaceae 76 Rosaceae 77 Ulmaceae 81 Rosid II Order Brassicales Brassicaceae 82 Capparaceae 84 Order Geraniales Geraniaceae 85 Order Malvales Malvaceae 86 Order Myrtales Onagraceae
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecological Systems and Natural Communities of Nebraska
    Terrestrial Ecological Systems and Natural Communities of Nebraska (Version IV – March 9, 2010) By Steven B. Rolfsmeier Kansas State University Herbarium Manhattan, KS 66506 and Gerry Steinauer Nebraska Game and Parks Commission Aurora, NE 68818 A publication of the NEBRASKA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION LINCOLN, NEBRASKA 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction..................................................................................… 1 Terrestrial Ecological System Classification…...................................................... 1 Ecological System Descriptions…………............................................................. 2 Terrestrial Natural Community Classification……………………………….….. 3 Vegetation Hierarchy………………………….………………………………… 4 Natural Community Nomenclature............................................................…........ 5 Natural Community Ranking..;……………….……….....................................…. 6 Natural Community Descriptions………….......................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Ecological Systems of Nebraska.………………………………… 10 Upland Forest, Woodland, and Shrubland Systems…………………………….. 10 Eastern Upland Oak Bluff Forest……….……………………………….. 10 Eastern Dry-Mesic Bur Oak Forest and Woodland……………………… 12 Great Plains Dry Upland Bur Oak Woodland…………………………… 15 Great Plains Wooded Draw, Ravine and Canyon……………………….. 17 Northwestern Great Plains Pine Woodland……………………………… 20 Upland Herbaceous Systems…………………………………………………….. 23 Central Tall-grass Prairie………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Natural Heritage Resources
    A Biological Inventory and Conservation Recommendations for the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Ft. Collins, Colorado 80523 March 1999 i A Biological Inventory and Conservation Recommendations for the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes, Colorado MARCH 1999 PREPARED BY: PHYLLIS M. PINEDA RENÉE J. RONDEAU AND ANNE OCHS PREPARED FOR: THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, SAN LUIS VALLEY PROGRAM† SAGUACHE, COLORADO †P.O. Box 674, Saguache, Colorado 81149 ii Biological Inventory of the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes. Pineda et al. 1999 __________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS USERS GUIDE/BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................. IV GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................ IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ESA Report Template for the Plant Element
    Status of Penstemon haydenii (Blowout Penstemon) in Wyoming 2012 Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management Rawlins and Rock Springs Field Offices, and Wyoming State Office By Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming Dept. 3381, 1000 E. University Avenue Laramie, WY 82071 May 2012 Agreement L10AC20123 Abstract Penstemon haydenii (Blowout Penstemon) is federally designated as an Endangered plant species. It was first recognized as part of the Wyoming flora in 1999. Systematic surveys were started in 2000 and completed in the Ferris and Killpecker dune fields in 2011, filling gaps among all prior surveys. A monitoring study was conducted in 2004-2006 with supplementary monitoring in more recent years. Publications on pollination biology and an initial report on seed ecology on P. haydenii in Wyoming have since been completed. Conservation measures are underway. This report represents a compilation, expanded treatment, and updated assessment of P. haydenii status that incorporates all previous work in Wyoming. Report citation: Heidel, B. 2012. Status of Penstemon haydenii (Blowout Penstemon) in Wyoming, 2012. Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management - Rawlins and Rock Springs Field Offices and Wyoming State Office. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY. Cover photo: Penstemon haydenii and its habitat in Wyoming. By B. Heidel. ii Acknowledgements This report is dedicated to all who have worked with Penstemon haydenii. Emma Stewart, Chicago Botanic Garden intern at Wyoming Natural Diversity Database (WYNDD) contributed many of the preparations needed for 2011 field surveys of P. haydenii using Geographic Information System software and layers for photointerpretation. Fieldwork assistance in 2011 was provided by Emma Stewart, Susan Chamberlain, Chicago Botanic Garden intern, and Hans Hallman (WYNDD).
    [Show full text]
  • STB117 Common Names of a Selected List of Plants
    Technical Bulletin 117 Revised August 1969 [ Common Names of a Selected List of Plants By Kling l. Anderson and Clanton E. Owensby I [ AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STAnON Kansas State University of Agriculture and Applied Science Manhattan Floyd W. Smith, Director Common Names of a Selected List of Plants' Kling L. Anderson an'd Clanton E. Owensby' Common names of plants often vary widely from place to place, even within rather limited areas. Frequently-occurring and widely-known species may have local names, or the same name may be used for several species. Common names, there­ fore, often fail to identify plants accurately. That makes it difficult to communicate about plants; the confusion may even discontinue attempts to convey ideas about the subject. Con­ versations may shift to a subject with an adequate common nomenclature. CONTENTS Scientific names are essential in formal writing. When com­ mon names are to be used, as in less formal publications, scien­ Page tific names must also be given either at the place where the Index to common names ............................................................................ 4 common ones first appear in the paper, in a footnote, or in an appended list. Only scientific names identify the species for all Grasses ........................................................................................................ 18 readers. In completely informal writing for a broad area, scientific names may be omitted. Sedges, rushes, and related genera .......................................................... 27 Since common names are so widely used, they should be used as uniformly as possible. The following common names Ferns and related genera .....................: .................................................... 28 are considered "standardized" for all writing in the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station and may also be used as a Other monocots .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture
    Vascular Plant Species of the Comanche National Grassland in United States Department Southeastern Colorado of Agriculture Forest Service Donald L. Hazlett Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-130 June 2004 Hazlett, Donald L. 2004. Vascular plant species of the Comanche National Grassland in southeast- ern Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-130. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 36 p. Abstract This checklist has 785 species and 801 taxa (for taxa, the varieties and subspecies are included in the count) in 90 plant families. The most common plant families are the grasses (Poaceae) and the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Of this total, 513 taxa are definitely known to occur on the Comanche National Grassland. The remaining 288 taxa occur in nearby areas of southeastern Colorado and may be discovered on the Comanche National Grassland. The Author Dr. Donald L. Hazlett has worked as an ecologist, botanist, ethnobotanist, and teacher in Latin America and in Colorado. He has specialized in the flora of the eastern plains since 1985. His many years in Latin America prompted him to include Spanish common names in this report, names that are seldom reported in floristic pub- lications. He is also compiling plant folklore stories for Great Plains plants. Since Don is a native of Otero county, this project was of special interest. All Photos by the Author Cover: Purgatoire Canyon, Comanche National Grassland You may order additional copies of this publication by sending your mailing information in label form through one of the following media.
    [Show full text]