Using J. L. Austin's Performative Language Theory to Interpret Ritual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Using J. L. Austin's Performative Language Theory to Interpret Ritual ,..••.... Judith Marie Kubicki complexus of symbols which are not objects, but actions that ...•...• , 1 negotiate and/or disclose relationships.' Within the ritual we can ~ liturgy, music can be described as one of many symbols within that f. Using J. L. Austin's Performative Language Theory dynamic complexus of symbols. If symbols require that we ap­ to Interpret Ritual Music-Making proach them as dynamic rather than static realities, then it followS that the proper object for the study of music as ritual symbol is not Both scholars and practitioners of liturgy generally agree that one the music printed on the page of a hymnal nor captured on com­ of the foundational principles underlying the reforms promul­ pact disc, but the action of music-making. Such a focus would shift gated byVatican II's Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy' is the impor­ the primary concern from the music itself and place it instead on tance of the active participation of the faithful in the liturgy. the activity of human subjects as music-makers. Such a focus need However, what is not always so clear, thirty-five years later, is what not deny the importance of using quality music in ritual music­ the active participation of the faithful actually involves and what making. Rather, it could better contextualize that concern and re­ best promotes the possibility of it actually happening. quire an anthropological basis for setting up criteria of excellence. The singing of acclamations, hymns, and other forms of ritual Several recent documents on ritual music, notably Universa music has long been promoted as an effective means for providing Laus's "De la Musique dans les Liturgies Chretiennes," refer to a worshiping assembly with the opportunity to participate actively music as a "symbolic practice:" thereby highlighting an under­ in the liturgy. While experience may have validated this assump­ standing of ritual music as activity. Similarly, the Ten Year Report tion on some levels, questions continue to be raised regarding published by the Milwaukee Symposia for Church Composers music's role in ritual prayer. These include questions regarding describes Christian liturgy as a symbolic event and symbol itself as whether music contributes more than simply" a nobler aspect" to a dynamic rather than a static reality.' the rites or "a more graceful expression to prayer,'" and why and In my own research, I have adopted a musical hermeneutic pro­ how music can be described as integral or ministerial to worship.' posed by the philosopher Lawrence Kramer. Interpreting music, Other areas of concern focus on questions of excellence and ap­ explains Kramer, requires opening a musical work's available her­ propriateness. meneutic windows and treating it as a field of humanly significant The approach which I have taken to examining music's role in action.' His hermeneutic is based on the conviction that although the liturgy begins with a consideration of the liturgy as a dynamic 4 Nathan Mitchell, "Symbols Are Actions, Not Objects," Living Worship I) Judith Marie Kubicki c.S.S.F. is the academic dean at Christ the King Seminary (February 1977) 2. in East Aurora, New York. She regularly reviews liturgical music for Worship. sUniversa Laus, Musique et liturgie (Paris: Les Editions du Cerf 1988). Transla­ tion in Claude Duchesneau and MichelVeuthey, eds., Music and Liturgy: The Uni­ 1See articles 11, 14, and 113 as significant examples of the importance given to versa Laus Document and Commentary, trans. Paul Inwood (Washington, D.C.: The this principle. Pastoral Press 1992) 1.1. The French title, Musique et liturgie, is the title of the pub­ 2 Sacred Congregation of Rites, HMusicam Sacram," in Ada Apostolicae Sedis 60 lication which includes both document and commentary. The English publica­ (1967) 5. In this article the English translation is taken from Documents on the tion is called Music and Liturgy. The title of the actual document found in Musique Liturgy 1963-1979: Conciliar, Papal, and Curial Texts (Collegeville: The Liturgical et liturgie is "De la Musique dans les Liturgies Chretiennes." The English title of Press 1982). Hereafter MS and DOL. the document is "Music in Christian Celebration:' 31 address these questions more fully in my dissertation, #Jacques Berthier's 6 See articles 9 and 12 of The Milwaukee Symposia for Church Composers: A Ten­ Taize Music! A Case Study of Liturgical Music as Ritual Symbol." This study will Year Report (Washington, D.C.: The Pastoral Press and Chicago: Liturgy Training be published by Peeters Publishers and Booksellers in 1999 as Liturgical Music as Publications 1992). Ritual Symbol: A Case Study ofJacques Berthiers Taizi Music, as part of their Liturgia 7 Lawrence Kramer, Music as Cultural Practice, 1800-1900 (Berkeley: University conden4a series and distributed in the United States by Books International. of California Press 1990) 6. Judith Marie Kubicki Ritual Music-Making 11 310 3 r music does not make propositions, it does have referential power. articulations other than assertions Or truth claims. For if, as Kramer In order to discover the possible meanings to which a particular asserts, meaning begins with-that is, forms around or clings to - piece of music may be referring, we need to approach it with the a truth claim - whether that claim be implicit or explicit, real or assumption that it resists fully disclosing itself. While the music fictive - then music has no meaning in the ordinary sense.12 If, does not give itself immediately to understanding, it can be made however, meaning can be found, not only in a grid of assertions, to yield to understanding if we are able to open hermeneutic but embedded in "a field of humanly significant actions,"" then windows through which our understanding can pass.' there is the possibility of using performative language theory to Kramer identifies three types of hermeneutic windows available locate meaning in ritual music-making. for interpreting music. They number textual inclusions, citational inclusions, and structural tropes. Textual inclusions refer to texts APPROACHING MUSIC AS A TYPE OF LANGUAGE set to music, titles, epigrams, program notes, and sometimes Before using performative language theory to interpret music, it is expression marking. Citational inclusions refer to various literary, important to justify the possibility of approaching music as a type visual, musical, and historical allusions.' It was the third herme­ of language. Jean-Jacques Nattiez has observed that "since music neutic window, however, what Kramer calls strnctural tropes, that is not, after all, language in the literal sense, the use of linguistic highlights the activity of music-making. By strnctural trope Kramer theory in musicology is always metaphorical, so that its value is means"a structural procedure, capable of various practical reali­ heuristic. ."14 zations, that also functions as a typical expressive ad [emphasis Justin London has used speech act analysis to interpret musical added] within a certain cultural/historical framework."lO According structures as compositional utterances made by composers. He to Kramer, structural tropes are the most powerful type of argues that, "as a result of our enculturated belief that music is a hermeneutic window. He understands them as units of doing kind of language, we can and often do treat music as a linguistic rather than of saying [emphasis added] that can evolve from any phenomenon. That is, we acquire our mechanisms for dealing with aspect of communicative exchange: style, rhetoric, representations, intentional communicative behavior through our acquisition of a etc. By describing the performance of music as an expressive act, linguistic framework."" In other words, London believes that it is we are focusing on the doing of something rather than the saying possible to use speech act analysis to interpret music because lan­ of something. guage is the prototypical framework we have adopted in order to Since ritual is a combination of both"articulate speech and pur­ deal with other kinds of meaningful communicative behavior." poseful action,"" an approach which views ritual language as ac­ London explains that it is possible to describe musical structures tion can provide a framework for interpreting music-making as an in terms of language and linguistic behavior because a MUSIC IS example of ritual speech acts. J. L. Austin's performative language LANGUAGE metaphor structures the actions a listener performs theory provides an important perspective on ritua/language be­ in apprehending music. As long as this metaphor is operative, it is cause it is built on the premise that, in certain instances, language as action takes precedence over language as assertion. This insight 12 Kramer, 5. is important for investigating ritual music's power to generate 13 Ibid., 6. meaning because it prOvides the possibility of locating meaning in 14Jean-Jacques Nattiez, Fondements d'une semiologie de la musique (Paris: Union Generale d'Editions 1975) 400. Cited in Francis Sparshott, "Aesthetics of Music," SIbid. in What Is Music? An Introduction to the Philosophy of Music, ed. Philip Alperson 9 Ibid., 9-10. (University Paik, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press 1987) 79· 10 Ibid. 15Justin London, #Musical and Linguistic Speech Acts," The Journal of Aesthetics 11 Wade T. Wheelock, #The Problem of Ritual Language: From Information to and Art Criticism 54 (Wmler 1996) 49. Situation," The Journal of the American Academy a/Religion 50 (1982) 50. 16 Ibid Judith Marie Kubicki Ritual Music-Making 12 3 313 r f possible to treat a composer and his or her works in the same way 1 speaker intends the utterance to produce in the hearer; and the in which we would treat a speaker and his or her utterances.17 This third is the actual effect the sentence has on the hearer. Later in his metaphor, London explains, is acquired in musical childhood and career, Austin came to see that all utterances have a performative becomes so established in the way a person learns to listen to music aspect.
Recommended publications
  • Performative Speech Act Verbs in Present Day English
    PERFORMATIVE SPEECH ACT VERBS IN PRESENT DAY ENGLISH ELENA LÓPEZ ÁLVAREZ Universidad Complutense de Madrid RESUMEN. En esta contribución se estudian los actos performativos y su influencia en el inglés de hoy en día. A partir de las teorías de J. L. Austin, entre otros autores, se desarrolla un panorama de esta orientación de la filosofía del lenguaje de Austin. PALABRAS CLAVE. Actos performativos, enunciado performativo, inglés. ABSTRACT. This paper focuses on performative speech act verbs in present day English. Reading the theories of J. L. Austin, among others,. With the basis of authors as J. L. Austin, this paper develops a brief landscape about this orientation of Austin’s linguistic philosophy. KEY WORDS. Performative speech act verbs, performative utterance, English. 1. INTRODUCCIÓN 1.1. HISTORICAL THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 1.1.1. The beginnings: J.L. Austin The origin of performative speech acts as we know them today dates back to the William James Lectures, the linguistic-philosophical theories devised and delivered by J.L. Austin at Harvard University in 1955, and collected into a series of lectures entitled How to do things with words, posthumously published in 1962. Austin was one of the most influential philosophers of his time. In these lectures, he provided a thorough exploration of performative speech acts, which was an extremely innovative area of study in those days. In the following pages, Austin’s main ideas (together with some comments by other authors) will be presented. 1.1.1.1. Constative – performative distinction In these lectures, Austin begins by making a clear distinction between constative and performative utterances.
    [Show full text]
  • Performativity SunCana Laketa, Institute of Geography, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
    Performativity Suncana Laketa, Institute of Geography, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This article is a revision of the previous edition article by D. P. McCormack, volume 8, pp 133–136, © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. Glossary Agency Is an ability of the subject to act. In other words, it is a capacity of both human and nonhuman subjects to produce a specific effect. Discourse Refers to implicit, taken-for-granted, and often unspoken sets of ideas and ways of knowing that are imbued with power. As a set of ideas and ways of knowing, discourse gives meaning to written and spoken language. Identity Is an articulation of one’s social affiliation, both individually and as a group. Materiality Refers to the objects and substances that constitute matterdhuman and nonhuman bodies, nature, elements, and things. Representation Is a process of giving meaning to objects and things through linguistic signs and symbols. Sociospatial practices Refer to activities such as walking, talking, driving, playing, and numerous other everyday practices that produce and reproduce both society and space. Space In human geography is not a fixed and bounded physical location, but a set of complex and intertwined social relations that take place in, and shape, the physical dimensions of space. Some authors differentiate between space and place; they define place as a process of ascribing meaning to undifferentiated space. Others, however, use both terms interchangeably. Spatiality Signifies an attribute or a feature that is related to space. In human geography, the term refers to the way space is implicated in social life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pragmatics of Powerlessness in Police Interrogation Author(S): Janet E
    The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. In a Different Register: The Pragmatics of Powerlessness in Police Interrogation Author(s): Janet E. Ainsworth Reviewed work(s): Source: The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 103, No. 2 (Nov., 1993), pp. 259-322 Published by: The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/797097 . Accessed: 16/08/2012 14:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Yale Law Journal. http://www.jstor.org Articles In a Different Register: The Pragmatics of Powerlessness in Police Interrogation Janet E. Ainswortht CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION....................................... 260 II. How WE Do THINGS WITH WORDS .............................. 264 A. Performative Speech Acts . ................................. 264 B. Indirect Speech Acts as Performatives ......... ................ 267 C. Conversational Implicature Modifying Literal Meaning ..... ........ 268 III. GENDER AND LANGUAGEUSAGE: A DIFFERENTREGISTER .271 A. Characteristics of the Female Register . .275 1. Hedges .276 2. Tag Questions .277 t Associate Professorof Law, Universityof Puget Sound School of Law. B.A. BrandeisUniversity, M.A. Yale University, J.D. HarvardLaw School. My appreciativethanks go to HarrietCapron and Blain Johnson for their able research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Performative Sentences and the Morphosyntax-Semantics Interface in Archaic Vedic
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Journal of South Asian Linguistics JSAL volume 1, issue 1 October 2008 Performative Sentences and the Morphosyntax-Semantics Interface in Archaic Vedic Eystein Dahl, University of Oslo Received November 1, 2007; Revised October 15, 2008 Abstract Performative sentences represent a particularly intriguing type of self-referring assertive clauses, as they constitute an area of linguistics where the relationship between the semantic-grammatical and the pragmatic-contextual dimension of language is especially transparent. This paper examines how the notion of performativity interacts with different tense, aspect and mood categories in Vedic. The claim is that one may distinguish three slightly different constraints on performative sentences, a modal constraint demanding that the proposition is represented as being in full accordance with the Common Ground, an aspectual constraint demanding that there is a coextension relation between event time and reference time and a temporal constraint demanding that the reference time is coextensive with speech time. It is shown that the Archaic Vedic present indicative, aorist indicative and aorist injunctive are quite compatible with these constraints, that the basic modal specifications of present and aorist subjunctive and optative violate the modal constraint on performative sentences, but give rise to speaker-oriented readings which in turn are compatible with that constraint. However, the imperfect, the present injunctive, the perfect indicative and the various modal categories of the perfect stem are argued to be incompatible with the constraints on performative sentences. 1 Introduction Performative sentences represent a particularly intriguing type of self-referring assertive clauses, as they constitute an area of linguistics where the relationship between the semantic-grammatical and the pragmatic-contextual dimension of language is especially transparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance, Not Performativity: an Embodied Critique of Post-Structural IR Theory
    Performance, Not Performativity: An Embodied Critique of Post-Structural IR Theory Ringmar, Erik 2014 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Ringmar, E. (2014). Performance, Not Performativity: An Embodied Critique of Post-Structural IR Theory. Paper presented at Performativity and Agency in International Politics, Goethe Universitet, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 Performance, Not Performativity: An Embodied Critique of Post-structural IR Theory Erik Ringmar, Lund University, Sweden Much of what takes place in world politics is best described not as events but as performances. Things are not just happening by themselves, but they are staged and made to happen, and to appear, in a certain fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do We Mean by Performativity in Organization and Management Studies? the Uses and Abuses of Performativity1
    What do we mean by performativity in organization and management studies? The uses and abuses of performativity1 Jean-Pascal Gond Cass Business School, City University London [email protected] Laure Cabantous Cass Business School, City University London [email protected] Nancy Harding Bradford University School of Management Emm Lane [email protected] Mark Learmonth Durham University Business School, Ushaw College, [email protected] Abstract John Austin introduced the formulation “performative utterance” in his 1962 book How to do things with words. This term and the related concept of performativity have subsequently been interpreted in numerous ways by social scientists and philosophers such as Lyotard, Butler, Callon, or Barad, leading to the co-existence of several foundational perspectives on performativity. In this paper we review and evaluate critically how organization and management theory (OMT) scholars have used these perspectives, and how the power of performativity has, or has not, stimulated new theory-building. In performing a historical and critical review of performativity in OMT, our analysis reveals the uses, abuses and under- uses of the concept by OMT scholars. It also reveals the lack of both organizational conceptualizations of performativity and analysis of how performativity is organized. Ultimately our aim is to provoke a ‘performative turn’ in OMT by unleashing the power of the performativity concept to generate new and stronger organizational theories. Key-words: Austin, Organization theory, Performativity, Translation, Theory-building !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1!A version of this paper is currently under review at the International Journal of Management Reviews.! ! 1! What do we mean by performativity in organization and management studies? The uses and abuses of performativity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Judith Butler's Notion of Gender Performativity
    Judith Butler’s Notion of Gender Performativity To What Extent Does Gender Performativity Exclude a Stable Gender Identity? J.T. Ton MSc 3702286 Faculty Humanities Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies Research Group Philosophy Date: 25-06-2018 Supervisor: Dr. J.E. de Jong Second reviewer: Dr. H.L.W. Hendriks Content ABSTRACT 2 INTRODUCTION 3 CONTEXT 3 RESEARCH QUESTION 3 METHOD 3 OUTLINE 4 1. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GENDER AND SEX? 6 1.1 THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN GENDER AND SEX 6 1.2 BUTLER’S CRITIQUE OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN GENDER AND SEX 7 2. BUTLER’S NOTION OF GENDER PERFORMATIVITY 8 2.1 GENDER AS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT 8 2.2 WHAT IT MEANS TO BE PERFORMATIVE 9 3. GENDER IDENTITY IS UNSTABLE 11 3.1 GENDER IDENTITY BEING UNSTABLE IS PROBLEMATIC 11 3.2 BUTLER’S EXAMPLE OF TRANSGENDER PEOPLE IS PROBLEMATIC 12 3.3 BUTLER’S EXAMPLE OF DRAG IS PROBLEMATIC 13 CONCLUSION 14 RESEARCH QUESTION 14 IMPLICATIONS IN A BROADER CONTEXT 15 METHOD 15 FURTHER RESEARCH 16 REFERENCES 17 APPENDIX 1 – FORM COGNIZANCE PLAGIARISM 18 1 Abstract The idea that gender is socially constructed has been accepted as common knowledge for a long time. This raises the question how does the construction of gender work. Judith Butler proposed that gender is performative. What does Butler (1999, 2004, 2011) mean when she uses the term gender performativity and to what extent does her view of gender being performative leave room for gender as a stable identity? In this thesis I argue that Butler’s notion of gender performativity implies that that gender identity is unstable.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Performativity Will Be Essential to Butler‘S Idea of Gender Performativity
    Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte How to do Things with Butler An Inquiry on the Origin, Citation and Application of Judith Butler’s Theory of Performativity Sarah Claeys Scriptie Ingediend tot het Behalen van de Graad van Licentiaat in de Taal- en Letterkunde: Germaanse Talen Academiejaar: 2006-2007 Promotor: Dr. Katrien De Moor Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 1. On LANGUAGE the Linguistic Performative ....................................................................... 5 1.1. AUSTIN: THE FIRST FORMULATION OF THE PERFORMATIVE ............................................... 6 CONSTATIVE AND PERFORMATIVE UTTERANCES .................................................................. 6 UNHAPPY PERFORMATIVE UTTERANCES .............................................................................. 7 IMPLICIT PERFORMATIVES ................................................................................................... 8 A GENERAL DOCTRINE OF SPEECH ACTS ............................................................................... 9 (UN)INTENTIONAL EFFECTS ............................................................................................... 10 A SPECIAL DOCTRINE OF THE ILLOCUTIONARY ACT ............................................................ 11 THE WEAKNESS OF THE PERFORMATIVE ............................................................................. 12 1.2. DERRIDA: DECONSTRUCTING AUSTIN ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LISS340 Performativity As/Of Method
    London Interdisciplinary Social Science Doctoral Training Partnership Advanced Research Methods in Social Sciences Course Code & Title LISS340 Performativity as/of Method Convenor(s) Professor Engin Isin, International Politics, Queen Mary University of London Institution QMUL Department LISS DTP Academic Year 2020-2021 Term Spring Number of Length of 1 3 hours Sessions Session(s) Date Time Location 09:00 - 12:00 Tuesday, 16th March 2021 Online (GMT) Enrolment Click here to enrol on this online course – you may be prompted to log in to SkillsForge Link: Course Description: This workshop is a critical exploration of how methods function in social and political inquiry. It will be organized as a 3-hour seminar. The first half of the seminar will focus on theories of performativity and speech acts since J.L. Austin. We will also discuss their influence on social science ontology, epistemology, and methodology. The second part will focus on examples of how scholars used performativity in various fields of social science. We will especially examine studies on citizenship, state, development, data, and security that exemplify performativity as/of methods. Pre course preparation: It is essential that you read the following eight articles for preparation. The articles for the first part for understanding performativity as a concept. The articles in the second part understanding examples of its usage in interdisciplinary social science fields. There are also eights recommended books. If you make yourself familiar with them especially with Austin (1962) you will get more out of the course. 1. For part 1: Please read (Beaney, 2012) on ordinary language philosophy or linguistic phenomenology, (Davis, 2008) on performance studies and performativity, (Allen, 1998) on Judith Butler and critical theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantics Versus Pragmatics
    Linguistics 103: Language Structure and Verbal Art Pragmatics and Speech Act Theory Semantics versus Pragmatics semantics: branch of linguistics concerned with the meanings of propositions pragmatics: branch of linguistics concerned with • the use and function of language; • the relation between the structural properties of an utterance and its deployment and reception by language users Traditionally, meaning has been studied by examining those sentences which express propositions which have a truth-value. (1) Snow is white. The cat is on the mat. Semantics is concerned with the conditions under which the proposition expressed by a sentence is true. These are said to be its truth-conditions. (2) ‘Snow is white’ is True if and only if snow is white. ‘The cat is on the mat’ is True iff the cat is on the mat. object language: language in which sentences subject to study are expressed metalanguage: language in which the truth-conditions of the proposition expressed by the sentence are expressed (3) ‘Schnee ist weiss’ is True if and only if snow is white. ‘La neige est blanche’ is True if and only if snow is white. The study of the truth-conditions of propositions has a long history in linguistics and logic. One way to talk about truth-conditions is to imagine an inifinite number of ‘possible worlds’ where different states-of-affairs hold true. A (true-false) proposition picks out the set of worlds in which the proposition is true. This way of conceptualizing meaning then permits certain logical relations to be defined mathematically in terms of set theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cyber-Performative in Second Life
    The Cyber-Performative in Second Life by Meindert Nicholas van Orden B.A., University of Victoria, 2007 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English, with a specialization in Cultural, Social, and Political Thought © Meindert Nicholas van Orden, 2010 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii The Cyber-Performative in Second Life by Meindert Nicholas van Orden B.A., University of Victoria, 2007 Supervisory Committee Dr. Evelyn Cobley, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Ray Siemens, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Arthur Kroker, Outside Member (Department of Political Science) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Evelyn Cobley, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Ray Siemens, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Arthur Kroker, Outside Member (Department of Political Science) Abstract I argue that current descriptions of the ways that language and computer code effect change (are “performative”) oversimplify the effects that utterances made in and through virtual spaces have on the real world. Building on J.L. Austin’s speech-act theory and Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction of Austin’s notion of performative language, I develop the theory of cyber-performativity. Though Katherine Hayles argues that “code” is more strongly performative than the utterances Austin focused on, Hayles’ analysis is founded on her problematic distinction between the logical computational worldview and the slippery natural-languages worldview. Cyber-performative theory builds on Hayles’ argument by showing that computational processes are as uncertain as natural languages: like human languages, “code” might always signify more and other than is intended.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 29 Performativity and Performance Moya Lloyd Loughborough University Abstract This Article Explores the Concepts of P
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository Chapter 29 Performativity and performance Moya Lloyd Loughborough University Abstract This article explores the concepts of performativity and performance in feminist theory. It begins by examining the idea of gender performativity in the work of Judith Butler, tracing its development from her earliest writings through to Gender Trouble and Bodies that Matter, and showing how Butler’s initial argument draws from phenomenology, and from performance studies (where acts are understood in theatrical terms). This is followed by a discussion of gender understood ethnomethodologically as a type of routine performance or form of “doing”. The second half of the article focuses on linguistic theories of performativity, derived from J. L. Austin and Jacques Derrida, and how they have been used by feminists such as Catharine MacKinnon, Rae Langton, and Judith Butler to illustrate pornography and hate-speech. After a discussion of the performativity of pornography, the focus turns to citationality, resignification, and “talking-back”. Keywords: gender performativity, linguistic performativity, gender as “doing”, gender performance, ethnomethodology, theatrical acts, pornography, hate-speech, “talking-back”. In 1990 a book was published that changed feminist theory profoundly. The book was Gender Trouble and its author was Judith Butler. The transformations it wrought on feminist understandings of the relationship between sex and gender centered on the effect of one of its central concepts. The concept in question was performativity, or, more accurately, gender performativity, for performativity has a history that predates and exceeds the work of Butler. 1 It originates initially in speech act theory; specifically, in the work of English philosopher, J.
    [Show full text]