Detrital Shocked Zircon Provides First Radiometric Age Constraint (<1472 Ma) for the Santa Fe Impact Structure, New Mexico, U

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Detrital Shocked Zircon Provides First Radiometric Age Constraint (<1472 Ma) for the Santa Fe Impact Structure, New Mexico, U Manuscript I 1 Detrital shocked zircon provides first radiometric age constraint 2 (<1472 Ma) for the Santa Fe impact structure, New Mexico, 3 USA 4 Pedro E. Montalvo1, Aaron J. Cavosie1,2, Christopher L. Kirkland2, Noreen J. Evans2, 5 Bradley J. McDonald2, Cristina Talavera3,Timmons M. Erickson4, Cristina Lugo-Centeno5 6 1Department of Geology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 9000, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 7 00681-9000, USA 8 2The Institute for Geoscience Research (TIGeR), John de Laeter Centre, School of Earth and 9 Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia 10 3School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, The King’s Building, James Hutton Road, EH9 11 3FE, Edinburgh, UK 12 4 Center for Lunar Science and Exploration, Lunar and Planetary Institute - USRA, Houston, TX, 13 77058, USA 14 5Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA 15 Date: April 23, 2018 16 ABSTRACT 17 The Santa Fe structure in northern New Mexico is one of the few confirmed impact craters in the 18 western USA. The history of the impact structure is obscure as it is tectonized and eroded to the 19 extent that an intact crater is not preserved, and what remains is located in a complex geological 1 20 setting. Shatter cones and shocked quartz were previously cited to confirm an impact origin, 21 however estimates for both impact age (350 – 1200 Ma) and crater diameter (6 – 13 km) remain 22 poorly constrained. To further evaluate the extent of shock deformation, we investigated ~6600 23 detrital zircon grains for shock features, using material collected from fifteen drainages and other 24 sites within a ~5 km radius of known shatter cone outcrops. Six detrital shocked zircon grains 25 were found at three locations, including two near shatter cones and one near brecciated granitoid. 26 Follow-up studies of bedrock at two sites proximal to detrital shocked zircon occurrences led to 27 the discovery of shocked zircon in situ in a shatter cone-bearing sample of biotite schist; shocked 28 grains were not found in brecciated granitoid at the second site. Electron backscatter diffraction 29 confirms the presence of {112} shock-twin lamellae in five shocked zircon grains, and secondary 30 ion mass spectrometry U-Pb data for three detrital shocked grains yielded 207Pb/206Pb 31 crystallization ages from 1715±22 to 1472±35 Ma. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma 32 mass spectrometry U-Pb ages for detrital zircon grains at five of the investigated sites provide 33 the first broad constraints on the local distribution of Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic bedrock in the 34 area. The presence of shock-twinned zircon indicates that some exposed rocks at the Santa Fe 35 structure record impact pressures up to ~20 GPa, which is higher than previous reports of ~10 36 GPa based on planar deformation features in shocked quartz. The 1472±35 Ma date from a 37 shock-twinned zircon yields the first direct radiometric maximum age constraint on the Santa Fe 38 impact event, and expands the possible time period for impact to the Mesoproterozoic. 39 Identification of shocked zircon in modern sediment led to the first discovery of shocked zircon 40 in bedrock at this site, which is notable, as shocked zircon is otherwise not abundant in the 41 studied rock samples. This study thus illustrates that detrital zircon surveys are an efficient way 2 42 to search for diagnostic evidence of shock deformation at putative impact structures where 43 shocked minerals may be present, but are not abundant in the exposed bedrock. 44 INTRODUCTION 45 The Meteorite Impact Record of Earth 46 Meteorite impacts are a major geologic process in the solar system, however only 190 47 terrestrial impact structures have been confirmed (Earth Impact Database, 2018). On Earth, 48 impact structures are susceptible to erosion, burial, and tectonic deformation, which provides 49 motivation to develop new methods for reconstructing the terrestrial impact record, particularly 50 for events that occurred during the Precambrian. The oldest evidence of terrestrial impact 51 processes are spherule deposits up to 3470 Ma in South Africa and Australia (Simonson et al. 52 2000; Byerly et al., 2002; Lowe et al., 2003; Koeberl, 2006; Glikson et al., 2016), some of which 53 contain shocked quartz (Rasmussen and Koeberl, 2004). The largest (~250 – 300 km) and oldest 54 impact structures on Earth are the 2020 Ma Vredefort Dome (e.g., Kamo et al., 1996) and the 55 1850 Ma Sudbury Basin (e.g., Krogh et al., 1984). Of the 190 confirmed impact structures, only 56 20 – 25 potentially formed in the Precambrian, although many have poorly constrained ages 57 (Jourdan et al., 2009; Earth Impact Database, 2018). In this study we present the results of a 58 detrital zircon survey designed to search for new evidence of shock deformation at the Santa Fe 59 impact structure in New Mexico, one of two potential Precambrian impact structures in the USA. 60 Evidence of Impact – Shocked Minerals 61 Meteorite impacts produce shock waves that cause instantaneously high pressures (10s – 62 100s GPa) and temperatures in target rocks and cause shock metamorphism (Melosh, 1989). The 63 brief yet extreme conditions form microstructures diagnostic of shock in some minerals (French, 3 64 1998). Impact-generated microstructures can be manifest in minerals such as zircon, quartz, 65 feldspars, and others (e.g., Ferrière and Osinski, 2013). Shocked minerals thus provide diagnostic 66 evidence of hypervelocity-driven deformation and can be used to confirm an impact event 67 (French and Koeberl, 2010). 68 Shock Deformation of Zircon 69 Planar microstructures, including planar fractures and planar deformation features, are the 70 most common impact-related microstructures described in zircon (e.g., Krogh et al., 1984; Bohor 71 et al., 1993; Erickson et al., 2013a), and form by 20 GPa in shock experiments (Leroux et al., 72 1999). We use the term planar fracture (PF) to describe planar microstructures when imaged on 73 external grain surfaces using backscattered electron (BSE) imaging (e.g., Bohor et al., 1993), and 74 employ additional genetic terminology to describe features quantified by electron backscatter 75 diffraction (EBSD) on polished surfaces (e.g., Erickson et al., 2013a). 76 Zircon {112} twin lamellae are considered diagnostic evidence of shock deformation, as 77 they have only been reported in grains from impact environments, and have been produced in 78 static experiments at 20 GPa (Morozova et al., 2018). Control of twin formation along {112} has 79 been attributed to elastic anisotropy of zircon, as the lowest values of shear modulus (G) and 80 Poisons ratio (ν) occur in the shear direction of twinning (η1, <111>) (Timms et al., 2018). 81 Shock-twinned zircon has been identified at several impact structures using EBSD, including 82 Vredefort (Moser et al., 2011; Erickson et al., 2013a,b; Cavosie et al., 2015a; Erickson et al., 83 2016; Erickson et al., 2017a; Montalvo et al., 2017; Cavosie et al., 2018a; Timms et al., 2018), 84 Sudbury (Thomson et al., 2014), Ries (Erickson et al., 2017b), Rock Elm (Cavosie et al., 2015b), 85 and in impact breccia from the Moon (Timms et al., 2012). The {112} twins occur as closely- 86 spaced (~5 µm) sub-micrometer-wide lamellae misoriented 65° about <110> relative to the host 4 87 zircon (Moser et al., 2011), and occur in up to four orientations in individual grains (Erickson et 88 al., 2013a; Cavosie et al., 2015a; Cavosie et al., 2018a; Timms et al., 2018). Studies have shown 89 that shock-twinned zircon generally does not record impact-age resetting (Erickson et al., 2013b; 90 Cavosie et al., 2015a; Montalvo et al., 2017; Cavosie et al., 2018a), although grains affected 91 post-impact by a thermal or fluid pulse can experience partial loss of radiogenic Pb (Moser et al., 92 2011). 93 The high-pressure ZrSiO4 polymorph reidite is also diagnostic of shock deformation, as it 94 forms at pressures above 30 GPa in shock experiments (Kusaba et al., 1985; Leroux et al., 1999) 95 and has been documented in several impact environments (e.g., Wittmann et al., 2006; Reddy et 96 al., 2015; Cavosie et al., 2015b; Erickson et al., 2017b). Shocked zircon that subsequently 97 experiences high temperature conditions can form a polycrystalline, or granular, texture. 98 Granular zircon consists of aggregates of recrystallized neoblasts ranging from ~1 to ~100 µm in 99 diameter (e.g., Bohor et al., 1993), and has been used to date impact events (e.g., Kamo et al., 100 1996; Moser et al., 2011; Cavosie et al., 2015a). The formation conditions of a granular texture 101 in zircon have not been constrained experimentally, however, orientation analysis indicates 102 formation at high temperature after shock decompression, with many granular zircon grains from 103 impact melt rocks preserving evidence for the former presence of reidite (Cavosie et al., 2016a; 104 Timms et al., 2017; Cavosie et al., 2018b). At temperatures >1673 °C zircon dissociates into 105 constituent oxides (El Goresy, 1965; Timms et al., 2017). In the absence of diagnostic shock 106 deformation or misorientation relations that record characteristic impact-related phase 107 transformations (e.g., Timms et al., 2017), granular zircon alone is not considered diagnostic of 108 impact. Metamorphic and/or tectonically deformed zircon may also show a granular texture (e.g., 5 109 Piazolo et al., 2012; Cavosie et al., 2015a) similar in appearance to that generated in impact 110 environments. 111 THE SANTA FE IMPACT STRUCTURE 112 Regional Geologic Setting 113 The Santa Fe structure is one of only five confirmed impact structures in the western 114 USA (Earth Impact Database, 2018). It is located in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains of northern 115 New Mexico, which host a geological archive of the major tectonic events that influenced crustal 116 growth and modification in the region over the last two billion years (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Shatter Cone and Its Surface Mesh-Structure Formed by Impact
    SHATTER CONE AND ITS SURFACE MESHED- STRUCTURE FORMED BY IMPACT MELT-GASIFICATION IN XISHAN TAIHU LAKE CHINA H.N. Wang1, Y. Chen1, X.F. Shen1 L.Y. Zhou1 and Y.W. Wang2 11Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China 210093 ([email protected]) 2 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign Introduction: Meshed--structure shatter cone: Discuss ion: Shatter cones are represented by a range of curved to The height of these cones is generally 50 to 70 cm. The 1. Meshed-structure are related to the melt- curvilinear fractures decorated with divergent striations. striation radiates from the original point at the top of cone, gasification of carbonates target rock: Striations radiate from an apex of a conical feature or from a similar to the longitude meridian. Meanwhile, cone surface Carbonates are brittle, fusible and volatile. Under the narrow apical area. Shatter cones are the only distinct meso shock wave, it is easy to be granulated. Its melting point presents hoopline around the cone. (Fig.D) The grid on is as low as 500-600°C. When the shock wave pass to macroscopic recognition criterion for impact structures. cone surface is generally in centimeter scale (2-4cm x Despite being known for 110 yrs, the formation mechanism through, it melts instantly and forms the atherosclerotic 2-3cm), latitude and longitude lines form a grid meshed- fluid, leaving a meshed structure and imprints after of shatter cone remains unclear. Different hypotheses for structure. This is an important and unique phenomenon cooling.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Structures and Events – a Nordic Perspective
    107 by Henning Dypvik1, Jüri Plado2, Claus Heinberg3, Eckart Håkansson4, Lauri J. Pesonen5, Birger Schmitz6, and Selen Raiskila5 Impact structures and events – a Nordic perspective 1 Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, NO 0316 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. 3 Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University, P.O. Box 260, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. 4 Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark. 5 Division of Geophysics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland. 6 Department of Geology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 12, SE-22362 Lund, Sweden. Impact cratering is one of the fundamental processes in are the main reason that the Nordic countries are generally well- the formation of the Earth and our planetary system, as mapped. reflected, for example in the surfaces of Mars and the Impact craters came into the focus about 20 years ago and the interest among the Nordic communities has increased during recent Moon. The Earth has been covered by a comparable years. The small Kaalijärv structure of Estonia was the first impact number of impact scars, but due to active geological structure to be confirmed in northern Europe (Table 1; Figures 1 and processes, weathering, sea floor spreading etc, the num- 7). First described in 1794 (Rauch), the meteorite origin of the crater ber of preserved and recognized impact craters on the field (presently 9 craters) was proposed much later in 1919 (Kalju- Earth are limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    The Ohio Journal of Volume 116 No. 1 April Program ANSCIENCE INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL Abstracts The Ohio Journal of SCIENCE Listing Services ISSN 0030-0950 The Ohio Journal of Sciencearticles are listed or abstracted in several sources including: EDITORIAL POLICY AcadSci Abstracts Bibliography of Agriculture General Biological Abstracts The Ohio Journal of Scienceconsiders original contributions from members and non-members of the Academy in all fields of science, Chemical Abstracts technology, engineering, mathematics and education. Submission Current Advances in Ecological Sciences of a manuscript is understood to mean that the work is original and Current Contents (Agriculture, Biology & unpublished, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere. Environmental Sciences) All manuscripts considered for publication will be peer-reviewed. Deep Sea Research and Oceanography Abstracts Any opinions expressed by reviewers are their own, and do not Environment Abstracts represent the views of The Ohio Academy of Science or The Ohio Journal of Science. Environmental Information Center Forest Products Abstracts Forestry Abstracts Page Charges Geo Abstracts Publication in The Ohio Journal of Science requires authors to assist GEOBASE in meeting publication expenses. These costs will be assessed at $50 per page for nonmembers. Members of the Academy do not Geology Abstracts pay page charges to publish in The Ohio Journal of Science. In GeoRef multi-authored papers, the first author must be a member of the Google Scholar Academy at the time of publication to be eligible for the reduced Helminthological Abstracts member rate. Papers that exceed 12 printed pages may be charged Horticulture Abstracts full production costs. Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University Libraries) Nuclear Science Abstracts Submission Review of Plant Pathology Electronic submission only.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Methods in Impact Crater Hunting – Case Summanen
    Geophysical methods in impact crater hunting – Case Summanen L.J. Pesonen1, S. Hietala2*, J. Plado3, T. Kreitsmann3, J. Lerssi2, and J. Nenonen2 1 Solid Earth Geophysics Laboratory, Physics Department, University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Geological Survey of Finland, Kuopio, Finland 3 Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Estonia, *correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Impact cratering is a ubiquitous process in our solar system affecting all planetary surfaces throughout geologic time. On Earth, there are currently 190 confirmed impact structures, which are distributed unevenly. The Fennoscandian Shield houses 17 % of them. The large amount of impact structures makes Fennoscandia one of the most densely cratered terrains on Earth. A dozen (12) impact structures have been discovered in Finland. The latest discovery, Lake Summanen is located in Central Finland, about 9 km southeast of city Saarijärvi. An impact generated structure was first hinted by airborne geophysical mapping by the Geological Survey of Finland in the early 2000`s (Lerssi et al., 2007) that revealed a circular ~2.6 km wide striking aeroelectromagnetic resistivity anomaly. Recent studies in 2017-2018 confirmed its impact origin based on the findings of shatter cone-bearing rocks and the identification of planar deformation features in quartz. 1. INTRODUCTION Summanen impact crater (62°39’00’’N, 25°22’30’’E) is located within the Paleoproterozoic Central Finland Granite Belt and is covered with the Lake Summanen. The lake is somewhat elliptical (8 km x 9 km x 4 km) in shape, whereby the longest axis extends in NW–SE direction due to the erosional influence of the latest (Weichselian) glaciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Shatter Cones of the Haughton Impact Structure, Canada
    SHATTER CONES OF THE HAUGHTON IMPACT STRUCTURE, CANADA Gordon R. Osinski(1) and John G. Spray(2) (1)Canadian Space Agency, 6767 Route de l'Aeroport, St-Hubert, QC J3Y 8Y9 Canada, Email: [email protected]: (2)2Planetary and Space Science Centre, Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, 2 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT workers suggested that shatter cones are tensile fractures that form due to interference between the Despite being one of the most distinctive products of incident shock wave and reflected stress waves [5]. hypervelocity impact events, shatter cones remain Two new models have also been proposed. The first enigmatic. Several contrasting models for their model by Baratoux and Melosh [6] builds upon formation have been presented, none of which appear earlier suggestions [4] invoking heterogeneities in to account for all of the observations. In this rocks as initiation points for shatter cone formation. preliminary study, we present an overview of the These authors suggest that the interference of a distribution and characteristics of shatter cones at the scattered elastic wave by heterogeneities results in Haughton impact structure, one of the best preserved tensional stresses, which produces conical fractures. and best exposed terrestrial impact sites. Shatter In contrast, Sagy et al. [7, 8], favour a model in cones are abundant and well developed at Haughton, which shatter cones are fractures produced by due in part to the abundance of fine-grained nonlinear waves that propagate along a fracture front. carbonates in the target sequence. They occur in three main settings: within the central uplift, within 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic and Early Palaeozoic Microfossils in the Karikkoselkä Impact Crater, Central Finland
    PROTEROZOIC AND EARLY PALAEOZOIC MICROFOSSILS IN THE KARIKKOSELKÄ IMPACT CRATER, CENTRAL FINLAND ANNELI UUTELA UUTELA, ANNELI 2001. Proterozoic and early Palaeozoic microfossils in the Karikkoselkä impact crater, central Finland. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland 73, Parts 1–2, 75–85. The Karikkoselkä impact crater is located at Petäjävesi (Lat. 62°13.3' N, Long. 25°14.7' E), in central Finland. The crater is filled with impact-generated brec- cias and redeposited sedimentary rock yielding microfossils. The assemblage consists of Proterozoic, Cambrian and Ordovician acritarchs, cyanobacteria and green algae thoroughly mixed in the deposit. The late Ordovician acritarch Diex- allophasis striatum indicates the maximum age of the impact event in the Keila Regional Stage, middle Caradocian in British Series, 458–449 Ma or later. A till sample overlying the sediments that infill the crater yields only Quaternary pollen and spores, indicating that the impact event occurred prior to the Fenno- scandian Ice Age. The most likely palaeomagnetic age of 260–230 Ma (late Per- mian to early Triassic) is neither excluded nor supported by the microfossil re- sults. However, other palaeomagnetic ages are excluded leaving this the most likely age. This article presents new evidence of Proterozoic and early Palaeo- zoic deposits that covered central Finland. Key words: impact craters, sedimentary rocks, microfossils, acritarchs, cyano- bacteria, Chlorophyta, Paleozoic, Proterozoic, Karikkoselkä, Finland Anneli Uutela: Finnish Museum of Natural History, Geological Museum, P.O. Box 4, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 12496Bulletin73 75 29.1.2002, 15:31 76 Anneli Uutela INTRODUCTION ated at 110.9 metres above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Shatter Cone and Microscopic Shock-Alteration Evidence for a Post-Paleoproterozoic Terrestrial Impact Structure Near Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 270 (2008) 290–299 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Shatter cone and microscopic shock-alteration evidence for a post-Paleoproterozoic terrestrial impact structure near Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA Siobhan P. Fackelman a, Jared R. Morrow b,⁎, Christian Koeberl c, Thornton H. McElvain d a Earth Sciences Department, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639, USA b Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA c Department of Lithospheric Studies, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria d 111 Lovato Lane, Santa Fe, NM 87505, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Field mapping, morphologic description, and petrographic analysis of recently discovered shatter cones Received 7 January 2008 within Paleoproterozoic crystalline rocks exposed over an area N5km2, located ∼8 km northeast of Santa Fe, Received in revised form 19 March 2008 New Mexico, USA, give robust evidence of a previously unrecognized terrestrial impact structure. Herein, we Accepted 20 March 2008 provisionally name this the “Santa Fe impact structure”. The shatter cones are composed of nested sub- Available online 7 April 2008 conical, curviplanar, and flat joint surfaces bearing abundant curved and bifurcating striations that strongly Editor: R.W. Carlson resemble the multiply striated joint surfaces (MSJS) documented from shatter cones at Vredefort dome. The cones occur as a penetrative feature in intrusive igneous and supracrustal metamorphic rocks, are unusually Keywords: large (up to 2 m long and 0.5 m wide at the base), display upward-pointing apices, and have subvertical, shatter cones northeastward-plunging axes that crosscut regional host-rock fabrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Keurusselkä - Distribution of Shatter Cones
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVIII (2007) 1762.pdf KEURUSSELKÄ - DISTRIBUTION OF SHATTER CONES. S. Hietala 1 and J. Moilanen 2, 1Kiveläntie 2 B 13, FI-42700 Keuruu, Finland, [email protected], 2Vuolijoentie 2086, FI-91760 Säräisniemi, Finland, [email protected]. Introduction: Keurusselkä impact structure was from the impact point increases. We have come to con- discovered by authors in 2003 [1], [2]. Well-formed clusion that most distant shatter cone like features we shatter cones in situ and boulders confirmed impact have found so far are still related to the impact struc- origin. A breccia with multiple sets of planar deforma- ture but this must be studied more carefully in future. tion features (PDFs) in quartz grains support this con- We have also measured directions of shatter cones. clusion. Structure is located in Central Finland (cen- This is not a simple task since only measurements that tered at 62°08´N, 24°37´E). seem to make any sense are made along the topside Exposed bedrocks of the region are Paleoprotero- striation of a shatter cone. What is the true topside of zoic granites and mica schists with volcanic inliers of the cone is not always so obvious. Central Finland Granitoid Complex. The age of the A breccia dike: In Autumn 2006 we discovered an granite basement is 1880 Ma. in situ breccia dike almost at the center of the structure. Precise age of the structure is unknown. It probably This is the first in situ breccia we have found and it is between 1880 - 600 Ma. 1880 Ma is the youngest may be impact related.
    [Show full text]
  • Shatter Cones in Hypervelocity Impact Experiments: Structure, Formation and Comparison to Natural Impact Craters
    Shatter cones in hypervelocity impact experiments: Structure, formation and comparison to natural impact craters DISSERTATION Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades “doctor rerum naturalium“ (Dr. rer. nat.) Der Fakultät für Umwelt und natürliche Ressourcen Der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Brsg. vorgelegt von Jakob Wilk Geb. in Berlin, Pankow Freiburg im Breisgau 2017 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Tim Freytag Erstbetreuer/Referent: Prof. Dr. Thomas Kenkmann Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Alex Deutsch Zweitbetreuer: Prof. Dr. Stefan Hergarten Tag der Disputation: ABSTRACT Impact processes have dominated the formation and development of planetary bodies in our solar system. The study of impact crater formation provides deeper knowledge of early Earth’s history and enables us to understand a surface process profoundly shaping the surface of most rocky planetary bodies. The highly dynamic process of impact cratering causes a series of characteristic effects in the targeted rocks, which are referred to as shock metamorphic effects. These shock effects provide a valuable tool to analyze impact craters and their formation. Shatter cones are diagnostic for shock metamorphism. They are the only macroscopic effect caused by shock, thus, being unambiguously identifiable in the field, provide a valuable tool to find and verify impact structures. Over the last decades, hypervelocity impact experiments and shock recovery experiments fundamentally enhanced our understanding of impact cratering, by controlled laboratory conditions. With this technique, e.g., microscopic effects were calibrated to corresponding shock pressures, or the effect of target properties on the cratering process was extensively studied. However, in only few experiments shatter cones were found and analyzed. Thus, the conditions of shatter cone formation remained unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • The IP Stuttgart Impact Rock Collection
    The IP Stuttgart impact rock collection Structure Country Sample Rock type, locality ( = thin section(s) available; = SEM samples available) Confirmed terrestrial impact structures Amguid, Algeria AMG-01 Yellow chalcedony from crater Aouelloul, Mauritania AOU-01 Black to brown Aouelloul crater glass AOU-02 Shocked target rock sandstone with breccia veins AOU-03 Ferriferous sandstone pellets and iron concretions Araguainha, Brazil ARA-01 Spinifex-textured granitic impact melt rock, central uplift region ARA-02 Shocked sandstone with shatter cones, central uplift ARA-03 Hematite ‘melt bomb’, N part of impact structure Barringer (Meteor) Crater Arizona, USA BAR-01 Shocked Coconino Sandstone BAR-02 Canyon Diablo meteorite (IA iron octahedrite) Boltysh, Ukraine BOL-01 Impact melt rock Bosumtwi, Ghana BOS-01 Suevite, 2.5 km N Nkowi Brent Ontario, Canada BRE-01 Granitic lithic impact breccia BRE-02 Brown-black impact melt rock (Bi-59-1503) BRE-03 Black impact melt rock; (B-11475-690) BRE-04 Grey-black impact melt rock (B-11475-600) BRE-05 Black impact melt rock (B-50-720) BRE-06 Black impact melt rock (B-5-695) BRE-07 Brown impact melt rock (Bi-4-27733) Carancas, Peru CAR-01 Carancas meteorite (H-chondrite) Charlevoix Québec, Canada CHA-01 Spinifex-textured massive impact melt rock, Ste-Marie-de-Charlevoix CHA-02 Clast-rich vesicular impact melt rock, Ste-Irénée CHA-03 Polymictic lithic impact breccia, Ste-Marie-de-Charlevoix Charlevoix Québec, Canada CHA-04 Shocked and brecciated anorthosite, summit of Mont des Éboulements CHA-05
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 207 (1995) Volume 104 (3-4) P
    1 Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 207 (1995) Volume 104 (3-4) p. 207-21 BEDROCK PALEOTEMPERATURE STUDY OF THE KENTLAND IMPACT SITE KENTLAND, INDIANA Mose N. Nasser III and Robert C. Howe Department of Geography, Geology, and Anthropology Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana 47809 ABSTRACT: Conodont samples were collected from exposed strata in the Kentland Quarry to determine the thermal effects of an impacting body. A meteorite impact, such as proposed by Deitz ( 1 947), should cause alteration of the conodont elements, especially those near the point of impact. Most of the Ordovician through Silurian elements recovered thus far are pale yellow and match the conodont alteration index (CAI) of 1 .0 (Epstein, Epstein, and Harris, 1977). However, some elements recovered from the basal Silurian (Sexton Creek Limestone) have a CAI of 3.0. These results are similar to those of Votaw (1980) and suggest that only minor, if any, thermal alteration of the conodonts occurred as a result of the formation of the Kentland structure. KEYWORDS: Conodonts, meteorite impact, paleotemperature. INTRODUCTION Located about 100 miles south of Chicago, the Kentland structure is exposed in the Newton Stone Company Quarry 2.5 miles east of Kentland, Indiana (Figure 1). The debate on the origin of the Kentland structure has lasted for more than a century (Gorby, 1886; Deitz, 1947; Tudor, 1971; Laney and Van Schmus, 1978). The structure has been called a Silurian reef (Gorby, 1 886). Tudor ( 1 97 1 ) claimed an endogenetic origin. However, no igneous rocks are present in the open quarry, and none has been found by coring operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Shatter Cone Exposures Indicate a New Bolide Impact Structure Near Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVIII (2007) 1207.pdf SHATTER CONE EXPOSURES INDICATE A NEW BOLIDE IMPACT STRUCTURE NEAR SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO. S. P. Fackelman1, T. H. McElvain2, J. R. Morrow3, and C. Koeberl4, 1Earth Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 ([email protected]), 2111 Lovato Lane, Santa Fe, NM 87505, 3Department of Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, 4Department of Geological Sciences, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Summary: The discovery of bona fide shatter site towards the northeast of the shatter cone outcrops, cones in an area at least 3 km2 in extent near Santa Fe, although the exact position remains unverified. New Mexico, USA, indicates the presence of a so-far Petrographic evidence: Thin sections were pre- unknown, deeply eroded impact structure that is be- pared both parallel and perpendicular to shatter cone tween ~320 Ma and ~1 Ga in age. surfaces. Perpendicularly cut thin sections contain Introduction: The shatter cones are observed ~12 possible evidence indicative of low levels of shock km northeast of Santa Fe, along Hyde Memorial Park metamorphism. Several quartz grains have been iden- Road [1]. These exposures extend laterally ~2 km tified containing poorly developed planar microstruc- along the road and ~1 km north of the road. Outcrops tures. Even though no evidence of planar deformation were found in road cuts, allowing easy access, as well features in quartz has yet been found, shatter cones are as in natural exposures, indicating these features are formed at such low levels of shock (i.e., <10 GPa) that not the result of rock blasting during road construction.
    [Show full text]