DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesson 11 Frictional Flows

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesson 11 Frictional Flows Lesson 11 Frictional Flows Frictional Flows Large scale flow in the atmosphere and Ekman ocean is close to geostrophic and thermal – Layer wind balance, in boundary layers we – Solution observe departures from geostrophy – Spiral due to the frictional terms – Wind Driven Circulation Winds exert a stress on the ocean’s • Ekman Transport surface • Ekman Pumping – Some similarity between the pattern of surface currents and surface winds Frictional Flows: Qualitative Solution Boundary Layer Theory (Nansen, 1898 - sea ice observations) Ekman Layer: Wind accelerates top layers of the water Once in motion, the water (sea ice) moves to the right (NH) due to Coriolis The top layer of water will ‘drag’ the next layer along (due to?) – Momentum flux – Once it is accelerated it will also turn to the right Expect the magnitude to decrease with depth as less momentum is transferred 1 Frictional Flows: Ekman’s Frictional Flows Solution Full turbulent EOM, where: u ⇒ u Scaling balance: – Coriolis, PGF, vertical friction ∂u ∂u ∂u ∂u + u + v + w − fv = Situation ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ t x y z – Near boundary (H is small) ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ − 1 P + u + u + u – Steady state AH AH Az ρ ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂y ∂z ∂z – Advection small (R o< 1) • Scale?? – Horizontal friction small (Ek< 1) Scale as ocean surface boundary layer – Vertical friction large (Ek~ 1) Ekman’s Solution Ekman’s Solution Ekman (1902) solved for the details of Ekman Boundary Layer Equations the flow observed by Nansen – Can be solved to find the currents in the Further Assumptions ocean driven by a surface wind – No significant pressure gradients – Notice: • The pressure gradient term has been removed –Az= constant • No horizontal dependence – uE = uE(z), vE = vE(z) ∂ 2 Result: uE fv + A = 0 2 ∂ 2 E z ∂ 2 ∂ u v z + E = − fu + A E = 0 fv E Az 2 0 E z 2 ∂ 2v ∂z ∂z − fu + A E = 0 E z ∂z2 2 Solution to Ekman BL Equations Solution to Ekman BL Equations Method 1 Define BCs – Solve for uE and vE separately – Align the horizontal axes with the surface Method 2 current – Use complex notation: Q ≡ u + iv u (z = 0) = (u ,0) E E E E0 – And = = = d 2Q if uE vE const at z 0 − = Apply BCs 2 Q 0 – And dz Az f f z i z u → u and v → v as z → −∞ 2A 2A E g E g = z z Q(z) Q0 e e Solution to Ekman BL Equations Ekman Spiral Ekman Depth (D E) Result – The depth of frictional influence – e-π: magnitude decreases by ~ 0.04 – The depth over which these currents occur – e-iπ: direction is -180 ° from the surface • This is the Ekman Depth Define D E such that: Observed 2A = π z – The surface current is 45 ° to the right of DE f the surface wind – With depth the speed will decrease , the Q(−D ) = Q e−π e−iπ direction will continue to deviate from the E 0 wind - Ekman Spiral 3 Ekman Spiral Ekman Spiral Why is this not observed in nature? – It is over long time averages Not really at steady state Waves - cannot make accurate current measurements Az not constant and not accurately represented Horizontal boundaries lead to horizontal variations (neglected) Ekman Solution Ekman Solution We need to include another BC at the surface The solution does not tell us about the – The stress at the air-ocean boundary is continuous relationship between the surface current • The wind stress is equal to the stress in the water – If we calculate the stress in the water, we can get the and the surface wind wind stress and the direction of the wind Use eddy viscosity theory Let’s relate the Ekman solution to the – Result: an equation for the surface Ekman current vs wind... the wind 1( + i) π Q = Τ 0 ρ 0 i 0 fD E 4 Ekman Transport Ekman Transport • Mass Transports (M E) • Explain large scale ocean currents • Not dependant on Az • 90 degress to the right (NH) of the surface stress τ M = 0y Ex f τ M = − 0x Ey f Ekman Transport Ekman Transport 5 Ekman Pumping Lesson 11 Part 2 The vertical response to Ekman transport Sverdrup Circulation Rotates the wind from geostrophic flow – Understand towards low pressure • Theory • Application Physical tendency to push mass out, or • Results/Solutions pull it in, at the bottom of the Ekman layer Streamfunctions Background Background What drives the ocean currents? – Our first choice may be the wind… Sverdrup (1947) helps answer this – He showed that the circulation in the upper kilometer (or so) of the ocean is directly related to the curl of the wind stress – He extended the concept of vertically integrated solutions to total flow (i.e., Ekman and Geostrophic components) 6 Background Ekman vs Sverdrup Assumptions Ekman – Steady state – Ignored the pressure gradient terms –R << 1 o Not applicable near western – Assumed homogeneity and level isobars –EH << 1 boundary currents • Non-geostrophic –E ~ 1 Z Sverdrup – Lateral friction and molecular viscosity are small – Ignores horizontal friction terms – Baroclinic flow – Surface turbulence described by eddy viscosity – Adds wind stress away from a coastal boundary – Level of no motion – the level at which the wind – Retains the pressure gradient terms driven circulation vanishes – Isn’t concerned with the velocity as a function of – Mean flow of deep ocean must be weak depth • Very small frictional stress due to bottom Sverdrup wants to solve for depth integrated • Very small vertical motion mass transport by the wind Sverdrup Circulation Sverdrup Circulation ∂ ∂τ 1 P 1 x ∂ ∂ Equations: − fv = − + M x My ρ ∂ ρ ∂ + = 0 0 x 0 z ∂x ∂y 1 ∂P 1 ∂τ fu = − + y – Cross differentiate EOM ρ ∂ ρ ∂ 0 y 0 z ∂u ∂v ∂w + + = 0 Result is Sverdrup Relation (Equation) ∂x ∂y ∂z β = ⋅∇×τ – No closure model required M y zˆ 0 Process Important and fundamental result! – Integrate the equations vertically – The northward mass transport of wind driven – Assume no motion at z = -H (H>>D E) currents is equal to the curl of the wind stress 7 Sverdrup Relation Sverdrup Relation Magnitude of Mass Transport Solve for Mx: (x<0 due to BCs) φ ∂ = − x tan ⋅∇×τ + ⋅∇×τ M x (x, y) zˆ 0 (zˆ 0 ) τ β R ∂y x 0 0 1 ≈ )( ≡ − )( dx M y x ∫ β ∆ x y = Average )( between x and 0 ∂ 2τ x x ≈ 0 curvature – Recall: M x (x, y) 2 β ∂y ∂f 2Ωcos φ β ≡ = ∂τ 1 x ∂y R M (x, y) = − 0 curl y β ∂y Sverdrup Relation Streamfunction ( ψ) Streamline – Lines that are everywhere parallel to the instantaneous wind velocity (steady flow) Streamfunction – Defines 2D flow – Satisfies the 2D continuity equation u = ∇ ×ψ where ψ = ,0,0( ψ ) if u = (u, v )0, ∂ψ ∂ψ or u = , v = − ∂y ∂x 8 Streamfunction ( ψ) Sverdrup Results ∂ψ M = x ∂y ∂ψ M = − y ∂x Can now say Sverdrup equation is: ∂ψ − β = zˆ ⋅∇×τ ∂x 0 Streamlines of mass transport in the eastern Pacific calculated from Sverdrup’s theory using mean annual wind stress. From Reid (1948). Sverdrup Results Comments on Sverdrup Mass transport in the Recall the assumptions: EPAC calculated from Sverdrup’s theory using – Geostrophic internal flow mean wind stress (solid lines) and pressure calculated from – Uniform level of no motion hydrographic data from ships (dots). – Ekman’s transport is correct Transport is in tons per second through a section one meter wide extending Solutions are limited to the east side of basins from the sea surface to a depth of one kilometer. – This stems from neglecting friction Note the difference in scale between My and Mx . No information on the vertical distribution of the From Reid (1948). current Only one BC can be satisfied – no flow through the eastern boundary – Need more complete equations for more complete description of the flow 9 Lesson 11 Part 3 Review Ekman Stommel – Shallow layer (Ekman layer) – Understand his solution – Flow was to the right of the wind – Western intensification – Divergence (±) and Pumping Monk Sverdrup – Understand his solution – Deep layer (not to bottom, only to z= -H) – Western intensification and – General circulation - counter currents countercurrents – Fails to represent western boundary currents (WBC) Stommel’s Solution Stommel’s Solution Stommel (1948) adds a simple bottom ∂ψ stress , which is proportional to velocity β = zˆ ⋅ ∇ × τ − k∇ 2ψ – Incorporate frictional terms - so we get the ∂x 0 WBC – The result - basic Sverdup with ad hoc friction ‘Interior’ balance Basic Sverdrup ∂ψ Boundary current β = zˆ ⋅ ∇ × τ − k∇2ψ Balance ∂x 0 10 Stommel’s Solution Stommel: Summary It’s second order – i.e. can solve two BC • No normal flow on east and west boundaries Uses ad hoc friction β causes western intensification – Since β does not change sign in the southern β=0 β=constant hemisphere we get western intensification there too Streamlines for simplified wind-driven circulation Stommel’s Quote Monk’s Solution Extension of Stommel and similar in logic “The artificial nature of this theoretical to Sverdrup model should be emphasized, Allows for lateral friction particularly the form of the dissipative Assumes term (the ad hoc friction). The writer –Ro << 1 thinks this work as suggestive, certainly –EH ~ 1 not conclusive. The many features of –EZ ~ 1 actual ocean structure omitted in this – Closure (for lateral friction) model should be evident.” – No motion at z = -H 11 Monk’s Solution Monk: Summary Result: 4th order - can satisfy 4 BCs – No normal flow east and west ∂ψ −β = ⋅ ∇×τ − ∇4ψ – No slip east and west zˆ 0 AH ∂x Good qualitative agreement Friction Gulf Stream transport too small Basic Sverdrup 12.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Global Ocean Wind Stress Climatology Based on Ecmwf Analyses
    NCAR/TN-338+STR NCAR TECHNICAL NOTE - August 1989 A GLOBAL OCEAN WIND STRESS CLIMATOLOGY BASED ON ECMWF ANALYSES KEVIN E. TRENBERTH JERRY G. OLSON WILLIAM G. LARGE T (ANNUAL) 90N 60N 30N 0 30S 60S 90S- 0 30E 60E 90E 120E 150E 180 150 120N 90 6W 30W 0 CLIMATE AND GLOBAL DYNAMICS DIVISION I NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH BOULDER. COLORADO I Table of Contents Preface . v Acknowledgments . .. v 1. Introduction . 1 2. D ata . .. 6 3. The drag coefficient . .... 8 4. Mean annual cycle . 13 4.1 Monthly mean wind stress . .13 4.2 Monthly mean wind stress curl . 18 4.3 Sverdrup transports . 23 4.4 Results in tropics . 30 5. Comparisons with Hellerman and Rosenstein . 34 5.1 Differences in wind stress . 34 5.2 Changes in the atmospheric circulation . 47 6. Interannual variations . 55 7. Conclusions ....................... 68 References . 70 Appendix I ECMWF surface winds .... 75 Appendix II Curl of the wind stress . 81 Appendix III Stability fields . 83 iii Preface Computations of the surface wind stress over the global oceans have been made using surface winds from the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for seven years. The drag coefficient is a function of wind speed and atmospheric stability, and the density is computed for each observation. Seven year climatologies of wind stress, wind stress curl and Sverdrup transport are computed and compared with those of other studies. The interannual variability of these quantities over the seven years is presented. Results for the long term and individual monthly means are archived and available at NCAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Fronts in the World Ocean's Large Marine Ecosystems. ICES CM 2007
    - 1 - This paper can be freely cited without prior reference to the authors International Council ICES CM 2007/D:21 for the Exploration Theme Session D: Comparative Marine Ecosystem of the Sea (ICES) Structure and Function: Descriptors and Characteristics Fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems Igor M. Belkin and Peter C. Cornillon Abstract. Oceanic fronts shape marine ecosystems; therefore front mapping and characterization is one of the most important aspects of physical oceanography. Here we report on the first effort to map and describe all major fronts in the World Ocean’s Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Apart from a geographical review, these fronts are classified according to their origin and physical mechanisms that maintain them. This first-ever zero-order pattern of the LME fronts is based on a unique global frontal data base assembled at the University of Rhode Island. Thermal fronts were automatically derived from 12 years (1985-1996) of twice-daily satellite 9-km resolution global AVHRR SST fields with the Cayula-Cornillon front detection algorithm. These frontal maps serve as guidance in using hydrographic data to explore subsurface thermohaline fronts, whose surface thermal signatures have been mapped from space. Our most recent study of chlorophyll fronts in the Northwest Atlantic from high-resolution 1-km data (Belkin and O’Reilly, 2007) revealed a close spatial association between chlorophyll fronts and SST fronts, suggesting causative links between these two types of fronts. Keywords: Fronts; Large Marine Ecosystems; World Ocean; sea surface temperature. Igor M. Belkin: Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA [tel.: +1 401 874 6533, fax: +1 874 6728, email: ibelkin@gso.uri.edu].
    [Show full text]
  • Intro to Tidal Theory
    Introduction to Tidal Theory Ruth Farre (BSc. Cert. Nat. Sci.) South African Navy Hydrographic Office, Private Bag X1, Tokai, 7966 1. INTRODUCTION Tides: The periodic vertical movement of water on the Earth’s Surface (Admiralty Manual of Navigation) Tides are very often neglected or taken for granted, “they are just the sea advancing and retreating once or twice a day.” The Ancient Greeks and Romans weren’t particularly concerned with the tides at all, since in the Mediterranean they are almost imperceptible. It was this ignorance of tides that led to the loss of Caesar’s war galleys on the English shores, he failed to pull them up high enough to avoid the returning tide. In the beginning tides were explained by all sorts of legends. One ascribed the tides to the breathing cycle of a giant whale. In the late 10 th century, the Arabs had already begun to relate the timing of the tides to the cycles of the moon. However a scientific explanation for the tidal phenomenon had to wait for Sir Isaac Newton and his universal theory of gravitation which was published in 1687. He described in his “ Principia Mathematica ” how the tides arose from the gravitational attraction of the moon and the sun on the earth. He also showed why there are two tides for each lunar transit, the reason why spring and neap tides occurred, why diurnal tides are largest when the moon was furthest from the plane of the equator and why the equinoxial tides are larger in general than those at the solstices.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean and Climate
    Ocean currents II Wind-water interaction and drag forces Ekman transport, circular and geostrophic flow General ocean flow pattern Wind-Water surface interaction Water motion at the surface of the ocean (mixed layer) is driven by wind effects. Friction causes drag effects on the water, transferring momentum from the atmospheric winds to the ocean surface water. The drag force Wind generates vertical and horizontal motion in the water, triggering convective motion, causing turbulent mixing down to about 100m depth, which defines the isothermal mixed layer. The drag force FD on the water depends on wind velocity v: 2 FD CD Aa v CD drag coefficient dimensionless factor for wind water interaction CD 0.002, A cross sectional area depending on surface roughness, and particularly the emergence of waves! Katsushika Hokusai: The Great Wave off Kanagawa The Beaufort Scale is an empirical measure describing wind speed based on the observed sea conditions (1 knot = 0.514 m/s = 1.85 km/h)! For land and city people Bft 6 Bft 7 Bft 8 Bft 9 Bft 10 Bft 11 Bft 12 m Conversion from scale to wind velocity: v 0.836 B3/ 2 s A strong breeze of B=6 corresponds to wind speed of v=39 to 49 km/h at which long waves begin to form and white foam crests become frequent. The drag force can be calculated to: kg km m F C A v2 1200 v 45 12.5 C 0.001 D D a a m3 h s D 2 kg 2 m 2 FD 0.0011200 Am 12.5 187.5 A N or FD A 187.5 N m m3 s For a strong gale (B=12), v=35 m/s, the drag stress on the water will be: 2 kg m 2 FD / A 0.00251200 35 3675 N m m3 s kg m 1200 v 35 C 0.0025 a m3 s D Ekman transport The frictional drag force of wind with velocity v or wind stress x generating a water velocity u, is balanced by the Coriolis force, but drag decreases with depth z.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Frictional Boundary Layers
    Chapter 5 Frictional boundary layers 5.1 The Ekman layer problem over a solid surface In this chapter we will take up the important question of the role of friction, especially in the case when the friction is relatively small (and we will have to find an objective measure of what we mean by small). As we noted in the last chapter, the no-slip boundary condition has to be satisfied no matter how small friction is but ignoring friction lowers the spatial order of the Navier Stokes equations and makes the satisfaction of the boundary condition impossible. What is the resolution of this fundamental perplexity? At the same time, the examination of this basic fluid mechanical question allows us to investigate a physical phenomenon of great importance to both meteorology and oceanography, the frictional boundary layer in a rotating fluid, called the Ekman Layer. The historical background of this development is very interesting, partly because of the fascinating people involved. Ekman (1874-1954) was a student of the great Norwegian meteorologist, Vilhelm Bjerknes, (himself the father of Jacques Bjerknes who did so much to understand the nature of the Southern Oscillation). Vilhelm Bjerknes, who was the first to seriously attempt to formulate meteorology as a problem in fluid mechanics, was a student of his own father Christian Bjerknes, the physicist who in turn worked with Hertz who was the first to demonstrate the correctness of Maxwell’s formulation of electrodynamics. So, we are part of a joined sequence of scientists going back to the great days of classical physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1809.01376V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 5 Sep 2018
    Draft version March 9, 2021 Typeset using LATEX preprint2 style in AASTeX61 IDEALIZED WIND-DRIVEN OCEAN CIRCULATIONS ON EXOPLANETS Weiwen Ji,1 Ru Chen,2 and Jun Yang1 1Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China 2University of California, 92521, Los Angeles, USA ABSTRACT Motivated by the important role of the ocean in the Earth climate system, here we investigate possible scenarios of ocean circulations on exoplanets using a one-layer shallow water ocean model. Specifically, we investigate how planetary rotation rate, wind stress, fluid eddy viscosity and land structure (a closed basin vs. a reentrant channel) influence the pattern and strength of wind-driven ocean circulations. The meridional variation of the Coriolis force, arising from planetary rotation and the spheric shape of the planets, induces the western intensification of ocean circulations. Our simulations confirm that in a closed basin, changes of other factors contribute to only enhancing or weakening the ocean circulations (e.g., as wind stress decreases or fluid eddy viscosity increases, the ocean circulations weaken, and vice versa). In a reentrant channel, just as the Southern Ocean region on the Earth, the ocean pattern is characterized by zonal flows. In the quasi-linear case, the sensitivity of ocean circulations characteristics to these parameters is also interpreted using simple analytical models. This study is the preliminary step for exploring the possible ocean circulations on exoplanets, future work with multi-layer ocean models and fully coupled ocean-atmosphere models are required for studying exoplanetary climates. Keywords: astrobiology | planets and satellites: oceans | planets and satellites: terrestrial planets arXiv:1809.01376v1 [astro-ph.EP] 5 Sep 2018 Corresponding author: Jun Yang junyang@pku.edu.cn 2 Ji, Chen and Yang 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Shelf Transport of Pink Shrimp Larvae: Interactions of Tidal Currents, Larval Vertical Migrations and Internal Tides
    Vol. 345: 167–184, 2007 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published September 13 doi: 10.3354/meps06916 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Cross-shelf transport of pink shrimp larvae: interactions of tidal currents, larval vertical migrations and internal tides Maria M. Criales1,*, Joan A. Browder2, Christopher N. K. Mooers1, Michael B. Robblee3, Hernando Cardenas1, Thomas L. Jackson2 1Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida 33149, USA 2NOAA Fisheries, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, Florida 33149, USA 3US Geological Survey, Center for Water and Restoration Studies, 3110 SW 9th Avenue, Ft Lauderdale, Florida 33315, USA ABSTRACT: Transport and behavior of pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum larvae were investi- gated on the southwestern Florida (SWF) shelf of the Gulf of Mexico between the Dry Tortugas spawning grounds and Florida Bay nursery grounds. Stratified plankton samples and hydrographic data were collected at 2 h intervals at 3 stations located on a cross-shelf transect. At the Marquesas station, midway between Dry Tortugas and Florida Bay, internal tides were recognized by anom- alously cool water, a shallow thermocline with strong density gradients, strong current shear, and a high concentration of pink shrimp larvae at the shallow thermocline. Low Richardson numbers occurred at the pycnocline depth, indicating vertical shear instability and possible turbulent transport from the lower to the upper layer where myses and postlarvae were concentrated. Analysis of verti- cally stratified plankton suggested that larvae perform vertical migrations and the specific behavior changes ontogenetically; protozoeae were found deeper than myses, and myses deeper than postlar- vae.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Wind-Driven Coastal Dynamics II. Estuarine Processes
    I. Wind-driven Coastal Dynamics Emily Shroyer, Oregon State University II. Estuarine Processes Andrew Lucas, Scripps Institution of Oceanography Variability in the Ocean Sea Surface Temperature from NASA’s Aqua Satellite (AMSR-E) 10000 km 100 km 1000 km 100 km www.visibleearth.nasa.Gov Variability in the Ocean Sea Surface Temperature (MODIS) <10 km 50 km 500 km Variability in the Ocean Sea Surface Temperature (Field Infrared Imagery) 150 m 150 m ~30 m Relevant spatial scales range many orders of magnitude from ~10000 km to submeter and smaller Plant DischarGe, Ocean ImaginG LanGmuir and Internal Waves, NRL > 1000 yrs ©Dudley Chelton < 1 sec < 1 mm > 10000 km What does a physical oceanographer want to know in order to understand ocean processes? From Merriam-Webster Fluid (noun) : a substance (as a liquid or gas) tending to flow or conform to the outline of its container need to describe both the mass and volume when dealing with fluids Enterà density (ρ) = mass per unit volume = M/V Salinity, Temperature, & Pressure Surface Salinity: Precipitation & Evaporation JPL/NASA Where precipitation exceeds evaporation and river input is low, salinity is increased and vice versa. Note: coastal variations are not evident on this coarse scale map. Surface Temperature- Net warming at low latitudes and cooling at high latitudes. à Need Transport Sea Surface Temperature from NASA’s Aqua Satellite (AMSR-E) www.visibleearth.nasa.Gov Perpetual Ocean hWp://svs.Gsfc.nasa.Gov/cGi-bin/details.cGi?aid=3827 Es_manG the Circulaon and Climate of the Ocean- Dimitris Menemenlis What happens when the wind blows on Coastal Circulaon the surface of the ocean??? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved 10.1029/2018JC014187 Upwelling Indices for the U.S
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans RESEARCH ARTICLE Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved 10.1029/2018JC014187 Upwelling Indices for the U.S. West Coast Key Points: Michael G. Jacox1,2 , Christopher A. Edwards3 , Elliott L. Hazen1 , and Steven J. Bograd1 • New upwelling indices are presented – for the U.S. West Coast (31 47°N) to 1NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Monterey, CA, USA, 2NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, address shortcomings in historical 3 indices USA, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA • The Coastal Upwelling Transport Index (CUTI) estimates vertical volume transport (i.e., Abstract Coastal upwelling is responsible for thriving marine ecosystems and fisheries that are upwelling/downwelling) disproportionately productive relative to their surface area, particularly in the world’s major eastern • The Biologically Effective Upwelling ’ Transport Index (BEUTI) estimates boundary upwelling systems. Along oceanic eastern boundaries, equatorward wind stress and the Earth s vertical nitrate flux rotation combine to drive a near-surface layer of water offshore, a process called Ekman transport. Similarly, positive wind stress curl drives divergence in the surface Ekman layer and consequently upwelling from Supporting Information: below, a process known as Ekman suction. In both cases, displaced water is replaced by upwelling of relatively • Supporting Information S1 nutrient-rich water from below, which stimulates the growth of microscopic phytoplankton that form the base of the marine food web. Ekman theory is foundational and underlies the calculation of upwelling indices Correspondence to: such as the “Bakun Index” that are ubiquitous in eastern boundary upwelling system studies. While generally M. G. Jacox, fi michael.jacox@noaa.gov valuable rst-order descriptions, these indices and their underlying theory provide an incomplete picture of coastal upwelling.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ekman Ocean Heat Transport in the Northern Hemisphere Response to ENSO
    The Role of Ekman Ocean Heat Transport in the Northern Hemisphere Response to ENSO Michael A. Alexander NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA James D. Scott CIRES, University of Colorado, and NOAA/ Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado. Submitted to the Journal of Climate December 2007 Corresponding Author Michael Alexander NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Science Division R/PSD1 325 Broadway Boulder, Colorado 80305 Michael.Alexander@noaa.gov 1 Abstract The role of oceanic Ekman heat transport (Qek) on air-sea variability associated with ENSO teleconnections is examined via a pair of atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) experiments. In the “MLM” experiment, observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) for the years 1950-1999 are specified over the tropical Pacific, while a mixed layer model is coupled to the AGCM elsewhere over the global oceans. The same experimental design was used in the “EKM” experiment with the addition of Qek in the mixed layer ocean temperature equation. The ENSO signal was evaluated using differences between composites of El Niño and La Niña events averaged over the 16 ensemble members in each experiment. In both experiments the Aleutian Low deepened and the resulting surface heat fluxes cooled the central North Pacific and warmed the northeast Pacific during boreal winter in El Niño relative to La Niña events. Including Qek increased the magnitude of the ENSO- related SST anomalies by ~1/3 in the central and northeast North Pacific, bringing them close to the observed ENSO signal. Differences between the ENSO-induced atmospheric circulation anomalies in the EKM and MLM experiments were not significant over the North Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf Stream (Western Boundary Current)
    Classic CZCS Scenes Chapter 6: The Gulf Stream (Western Boundary Current) The Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico are the source of what is likely the most well- known current in the oceans—the Gulf Stream. The warm waters of the Gulf Stream can be observed using several different types of remote sensors, including sensors of ocean color (CZCS), sea surface temperature, and altimetry. Images of the Gulf Stream taken by the CZCS, one of which is shown here, are both striking and familiar. CZCS image of the Gulf Stream and northeastern coast of the United States. Several large Gulf Stream warm core rings are visible in this image, as are higher productivity areas near the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays. To the northeast, part of the Grand Banks region near Nova Scotia is visible. Despite the high productivity of this region, overfishing caused the total collapse of the Grand Banks cod fishery in the early 1990s. The Gulf Stream is a western boundary current, indicating that if flows along the west side of a major ocean basin (in this case the North Atlantic Ocean). The corresponding current in the Pacific Ocean is called the Kuroshio, which flows north to about the center of the Japanese archipelago and then turns eastward into the central Pacific basin. In the Southern Hemisphere, the most noteworthy western boundary current is the Agulhas Current in the Indian Ocean. Note that the Agulhas flows southward instead of northward like the Gulf Stream and the Kuroshio. Western boundary currents result from the interaction of ocean basin topography, the general direction of the prevailing winds, and the general motion of oceanic waters induced by Earth's rotation.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Surface Currents in the Northern North Atlantic Ocean Sirpa
    I, Source of Acquisition / NASA Goddard Space mght Center Shifting surface currents in the northern North Atlantic Ocean Sirpa Hakkinen (1) and Peter B. Rhines (2) (1) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 614.2, Greenbelt, RID 20771 (2) University of Washington, Seattle, PO Box 357940, WA 98195 Analysis of surface drifter tracks in the North Atlantic Ocean from the time period 1990 to 2006 provides the first evidence that the Gulf Stream waters can have direct pathways to the Nordic Seas. Prior to 2000, the drifters entering the channels leading to the Nordic Seas originated in the western and central subpolar region. Since 2001 several paths fiom the western subtropics have been present in the drifter tracks leading to the Rockall Trough through wfuch the most saline North Atlantic Waters pass to the Nordic Seas. Eddy kinetic energy fiom altimetry shows also the increased energy along the same paths as the drifters, These near surface changes have taken effect while the altimetry shows a continual weakening of the subpolar gyre. These findings highlight the changes in the vertical structure of the northern North Atlantic Ocean, its dynamics and exchanges with the higher latitudes, and show how pathways of the thermohaline circulation can open up and maintain or increase its intensity even as the basin-wide circulation spins down. Shifting surface currents in the northern North Atlantic Ocean Sirpa Hakkinen (1) and Peter B. Rhines (2) (1) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 614.2, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (2) University of Washington, Seattle, PO Box 357940, WA 98195 Inflows to the Nordic seas from the main North Atlantic pass through three routes: through the Rockall Trough to the Faroe-Shetland Channel, through the Iceland basin over the Iceland-Faroe Ridge and via the Irminger Current passing west of Iceland.
    [Show full text]