The Nescopeck Path Many of the Early Settlers of the Berwick And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania
Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania In partnership with the following major contributors and Technical Committee Organizations represented: The United States Geological Survey, PA Water Science Center Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., LLC (posthumously) Susquehanna River Basin Commission Dauphin County Conservation District Ian C. Palmer-Researcher PA Department of Environmental Protection-- Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, Bureau of Deep Mine Safety, & Pottsville District Mining Office MINE WATER RESOURCES OF THE ANTHRACITE REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA Foreword: Dedication to Roger J. Hornberger, P.G. (Robert E. Hughes) PART 1. Mine Water of the Anthracite Region Chapter 1. Introduction to the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, and Roger J. Hornberger, P.G.) Chapter 2. Geology of the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., Caroline M. Loop, Keith B.C. Brady, P.G., Nathan A. Houtz, P.G.) Chapter 3. Colliery Development in the Anthracite Coal Fields (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., David L. Williams, Daniel J. Koury and Keith A. Laslow, P.G.) Chapter 4. A Geospatial Approach to Mapping the Anthracite Coal Fields (Michael A. Hewitt, Robert E. Hughes & Maynard L. (Mike) Dunn, Jr., P.G.) Chapter 5. The Development and Demise of Major Mining in the Northern Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., and Michael A. Hewitt) Chapter 6. The Development of Mining and Mine Drainage Tunnels of the Eastern Middle Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, Jerrald Hollowell. P.G., Keith A. Laslow, P.G., and Roger J. -
Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study of Economics and Performance of a Hydroelectric Installation at the Jeddo Mine Drainage Tunnel A Study Prepared in Partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites Joseph Owen Roberts and Gail Mosey Produced under direction of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) under Interagency Agreement IAG-09-1719 and Task No WFD3.1000. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-7A30-51321 February 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Feasibility Study of Economics and Performance of a Hydroelectric Installation at the Jeddo Mine Drainage Tunnel A Study Prepared in Partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites Joseph Owen Roberts and Gail Mosey Prepared under Task No. WFD3.1000 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-7A30-51321 Golden, CO 80401 February 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This manuscript has been authored by employees of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (“Alliance”) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”). -
Little-Nescopeck-Water-Quality.Pdf
ASSESSMENT OF CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING ACID MINE DRAINAGE TO THE LITTLE NESCOPECK CREEK WATERSHED, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, AND AN ABATEMENT PLAN TO MITIGATE IMPAIRED WATER QUALITY IN THE WATERSHED Publication No. 204 July 1999 Paula B. Ballaron, P.G. Hydrogeologist, Susquehanna River Basin Commission Christopher M. Kocher, Director Rivers Program, Wildlands Conservancy Jerrald R. Hollowell, P.G. Consultant Prepared in cooperation with Thomas J. Kerr, Executive Director This report was prepared for Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Watershed Conservation, under Grant ME96114. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION Paul O. Swartz, Executive Director John T. Hicks, N.Y. Commissioner Scott J. Foti., N.Y. Alternate James M. Seif, Pa. Commissioner Irene B. Brooks, Pa. Alternate Jane T. Nishida, Md. Commissioner J.L. Hearn, Md. Alternate Major General Jerry L. Sinn, U.S. Commissioner Colonel Bruce A. Berwick, U.S. Alternate The Susquehanna River Basin Commission was created as an independent agency by a federal-interstate compact* among the states of Maryland, New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the federal government. In creating the Commission, the Congress and state legislatures formally recognized the water resources of the Susquehanna River Basin as a regional asset vested with local, state, and national interests for which all the parties share responsibility. As the single federal-interstate water resources agency with basinwide authority, the Commission's goal is to coordinate the planning, conservation, management, utilization, development and control of basin water resources among the public and private sectors. *Statutory Citations: Federal - Pub. L. 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 (December 1970); Maryland - Natural Resources Sec. 8-301 (Michie 1974); New York - ECL Sec. -
HIGHWAY-RAILROAD and HIGHWAY BRIDGE CAPITAL BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL ACT for 2002-2003 Act of Dec
HIGHWAY-RAILROAD AND HIGHWAY BRIDGE CAPITAL BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL ACT FOR 2002-2003 Act of Dec. 16, 2002, P.L. 1815, No. 223 Cl. 86 A SUPPLEMENT To the act of December 8, 1982 (P.L.848, No.235), entitled "An act providing for the adoption of capital projects related to the repair, rehabilitation or replacement of highway bridges to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt and capital projects related to highway and safety improvement projects to be financed from current revenue of the Motor License Fund," itemizing additional local and State bridge projects. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Highway-Railroad and Highway Bridge Capital Budget Supplemental Act for 2002-2003. Section 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases when used in this act shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: "Account." The Highway Bridge Improvement Restricted Account within the Motor License Fund. "Capital project." A capital project as defined in section 302 of the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L.1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, and shall include a county or municipal bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement project as set forth in this act. "Department." The Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth. "Secretary." The Secretary of Transportation of the Commonwealth. Section 3. Total authorization for bridge projects. (a) Total projects.--The total authorization for the costs of the projects itemized pursuant to this act and to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt shall be $1,563,530,000. -
BLACK CREEK, LITTLE NESCOPECK CREEK and UNT LITTLE NESCOPECK CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Luzerne County
Final BLACK CREEK, LITTLE NESCOPECK CREEK and UNT LITTLE NESCOPECK CREEK WATERSHED TMDL Luzerne County For Acid Mine Drainage Affected Segments Prepared by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection May 2, 2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES Introduction................................................................................................................................. 4 Directions to the Black Creek/Little Nescopeck Creek Watershed............................................ 4 Segments addressed in this TMDL............................................................................................. 5 Clean Water Act Requirements .................................................................................................. 5 Section 303(d) Listing Process ................................................................................................... 6 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL........................................................................................ 7 Watershed History ...................................................................................................................... 7 AMD Methodology..................................................................................................................... 9 TMDL Endpoints...................................................................................................................... 11 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS) ........................................................................................ 12 Allocation Summary................................................................................................................ -
Nescopeck Creek Watershed
Appendix A Abandoned Mine Land Problem Areas and Features (East to West), USGS Identified Mine Drainage Points, 303(d) Listed Streams and Recent Mining Info Eas t Jeddo [2108] P age 3 G reen Mountain [3219] P age 5 Je ddo South [2110] P age 9 D rifton South [3217] P age 13 F reeland South [1381] P age 15 S outhwest Freeland [2118] P age 19 N orth Drifton [2109] P age 21 H ells Kitchen [3223] P age 23 O akdale North [3221] P age 27 P ardeesville [3218] P age 31 Eb ervale [0265] P age 35 Latti mer [3212] P age 37 M ount Laurel [1383] P age 41 H azleton S.C. West [1365] P age 43 H azleton Airport [3211] P age 47 C ranberry Ridge [3213] P age 51 K is-Lyn West [4120] P age 57 H ollars Hill South [0493] P age 59 G rape Run Reservoir [3724] P age 63 H ollars Hill [3725] P age 65 H arwood [2112] P age 69 H umboldt East [2057] P age 71 S outheast Humboldt [3719] P age 75 S tony Creek [3726] P age 77 Bl ack Ridge [1613] P age 79 H umboldt North [0263] P age 81 H umboldt Southwest [1372] P age 85 H umboldt Far SW [1374] P age 89 Tomh icken East [1169] P age 91 Tomh icken [3716] P age 93 Bu ck Mountain – Sugarloaf [3253] P age 95 F ern Glen [3044] P age 97 G owen [3043] P age 101 1 of 104 2 of 104 East Jeddo [2108] Summary: Municipality: Foster Township Problem Area Size: 228.49 acres Sub-Watershed: Black Creek Reclamation Status: 5 of 8 = 62.5 % Mine Pool Basin: Big Black Creek Basin Map Scale: 1:10,000 Infiltration Points Identified by the SRBC: This problem area contains Black Creek #2, #6 & #7 (SRBC Pub. -
Nescopeck-Watershed
EPCAMR Watershed Restoration Assessment and Strategy for the Nescopeck Watershed Luzerne County, Pennsylvania: Based on Current Available GIS Information Michael A. Hewitt, Robert E. Hughes 11/17/2006 Publication of the Eastern Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation (EPCAMR), 485 Smith’s Pond Road, Shavertown, PA 18708 Watershed Restoration Assessment and Strategy for the Nescopeck Watershed Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Glossary: EPCAMR Eastern Pennsylvania Coalition for Abandoned Mine Reclamation SMCRA Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 PA DEP Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection BAMR PA DEP Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation BMR PA DEP Bureau of Mineral Resources OSM U. S. Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining USGS U. S. Geological Survey MRAB Mining and Reclamation Advisory Board SRBC Susquehanna River Basin Commission AMLF Abandoned Mine Land Feature The mining types S Surface U Underground Priority 1 and 2 (health & safety problems): VO Vertical Opening P Dangerous Portal or Mine Opening SB Surface Burning (Refuse Pile Burning) UMF Underground Mine Fire GUB Gasses: Underground Burning (Venting from Mine Fire) GHE Gasses: Hazardous / Explosive (Venting from Mine) DPE Dangerous Pile or Embankment DI Dangerous Impoundment (Water or Slurry) DH Dangerous Highwall (>40’ High) HWB Hazardous Water Body S Subsidence Area CS Clogged Stream CLS Clogged Stream Lands HEF Hazardous Equipment and/or Facilities DIRW Dangerous Industrial or Residential Waste PWHC Polluted Water for Human