DOCSLIB.ORG

HIGHWAY-RAILROAD and HIGHWAY BRIDGE CAPITAL BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL ACT for 2002-2003 Act of Dec

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HIGHWAY-RAILROAD and HIGHWAY BRIDGE CAPITAL BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL ACT for 2002-2003 Act of Dec HIGHWAY-RAILROAD AND HIGHWAY BRIDGE CAPITAL BUDGET SUPPLEMENTAL ACT FOR 2002-2003 Act of Dec. 16, 2002, P.L. 1815, No. 223 Cl. 86 A SUPPLEMENT To the act of December 8, 1982 (P.L.848, No.235), entitled "An act providing for the adoption of capital projects related to the repair, rehabilitation or replacement of highway bridges to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt and capital projects related to highway and safety improvement projects to be financed from current revenue of the Motor License Fund," itemizing additional local and State bridge projects. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Highway-Railroad and Highway Bridge Capital Budget Supplemental Act for 2002-2003. Section 2. Definitions. The following words and phrases when used in this act shall have the meanings given to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: "Account." The Highway Bridge Improvement Restricted Account within the Motor License Fund. "Capital project." A capital project as defined in section 302 of the act of February 9, 1999 (P.L.1, No.1), known as the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act, and shall include a county or municipal bridge rehabilitation, replacement or improvement project as set forth in this act. "Department." The Department of Transportation of the Commonwealth. "Secretary." The Secretary of Transportation of the Commonwealth. Section 3. Total authorization for bridge projects. (a) Total projects.--The total authorization for the costs of the projects itemized pursuant to this act and to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt shall be $1,563,530,000. (b) State projects.--The authorization for capital projects in the category of highway bridge projects and forestry and State park bridge projects to be constructed by the Department of Transportation, its successors or assigns and to be financed by the incurring of debt or from the account, itemized in this act under the category of State bridges, shall be $1,168,735,000. (c) Non-State projects.--The authorization for non-State highway bridge projects to be constructed by municipalities and to be financed in part with grants not exceeding 80% of the non-Federal share of the costs made to the local government municipalities by the department from revenues deposited in the account, itemized in this act under the category of local bridges, shall be $394,795,000. Section 4. Itemization of bridge projects. The individual capital projects in the category of highway projects to be constructed by the Department of Transportation, its successors or assigns and to be financed from current revenue or by the incurring of debt are hereby itemized, together with their estimated financial costs, in the following sections. Section 5. Adams County. (a) Local Bridges (1) Hamilton Township, TR 471, Home Road Bridge over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 260,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $185,000) (Land Allocation - $15,000) (Design and Contingencies - $60,000) (2) Hamilton Township, TR 469, Protectory Road Bridge over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 265,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $180,000) (Land Allocation - $25,000) (Design and Contingencies - $60,000) (3) Hamilton Township, TR 473, St. Mary's Road Bridge over Beaver Creek, Bridge Replacement 295,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $200,000) (Land Allocation - $30,000) (Design and Contingencies - $65,000) (b) State Bridges (1) Various Bridges, Bridge Rehabilitation 1,000,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $900,000) (Design and Contingencies - $100,000) Section 6. Allegheny County. (a) Local Bridges (1) Emsworth Borough, Emsworth Bridge, Bridge Replacement 426,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $383,000) (Design and Contingencies - $43,000) (2) North Braddock Borough, Tassey Hollow Bridge, Bridge Replacement 1,100,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $990,000) (Design and Contingencies - $110,000) (3) City of Pittsburgh, Hot Metal Bridge, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge, Rehabilitation and Painting 6,938,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $6,038,000) (Design and Contingencies - $900,000) (4) City of Pittsburgh, West Ohio Street Bridge over Conrail, Bridge Rehabilitation 639,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $499,000) (Design and Contingencies - $140,000) (5) City of Pittsburgh, Davis Avenue Bridge, Bridge Replacement 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,320,000) (Design and Contingencies - $480,000) (6) City of Pittsburgh, Eliza Furnace Trail Bridge, Bridge Reconstruction 760,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $600,000) (Design and Contingencies - $160,000) (7) City of Pittsburgh, Larimer Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,000,000) (Design and Contingencies - $800,000) (8) City of Pittsburgh, Ridge Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,210,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $2,850,000) (Design and Contingencies - $360,000) (9) City of Pittsburgh, Davis Avenue Bridge over Woods Run Avenue, Bridge Reconstruction 2,000,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $1,700,000) (Design and Contingencies - $300,000) (10) City of Pittsburgh, Davis Avenue Bridge, Brighton Heights, Bridge Rehabilitation 2,500,000 (11) City of Pittsburgh, Wabash Bridge, New Bridge Construction 2,000,000 (12) City of Pittsburgh, Light Rail Transit, New Bridge Construction 2,000,000 (13) City of Pittsburgh, Bridge over 6th, 7th and 9th Streets, Bridge Rehabilitation 2,000,000 (14) Osborne Borough, Bridge over Railroad, New Bridge Construction 1,000,000 (15) Emsworth Borough, Bridge over Herron Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation 1,500,000 (16) Emsworth Borough, Gibson Street Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 1,500,000 (17) Edgebrook Avenue Bridge, Bridge Replacement 2,500,000 (18) Coraopolis Borough, Clifton Mine/Coraopolis Heights Bridge, Bridge Replacement 2,000,000 (19) Crafton Borough, Blacks Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 2,000,000 (20) City of Pittsburgh, Ridge Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,210,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $2,850,000) (Design and Contingencies - $360,000) (21) City of Pittsburgh, Larimer Avenue Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,000,000) (Design and Contingencies - $800,000) (22) City of Pittsburgh, Eliza Furnace Trail Bridge, Bridge Reconstruction 760,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $600,000) (Design and Contingencies - $160,000) (23) City of Pittsburgh, Davis Avenue Bridge, Bridge Replacement 3,800,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $3,320,000) (Design and Contingencies - $480,000) (24) City of Pittsburgh, Hot Metal Bridge, Bridge Replacement 700,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $490,000) (Land Allocation - $70,000) (Design and Contingencies - $140,000) (25) Whitaker Borough, Steel Valley Rail Trail Bridge, Bridge Replacement 600,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $420,000) (Land Allocation - $60,000) (Design and Contingencies - $120,000) (b) State Bridges (1) SR 2081, Bridge over Business US 22 in Monroeville, Monroeville Borough, Bridge Replacement 340,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $176,000) (Land Allocation - $56,000) (Design and Contingencies - $108,000) (2) I-79, Neville Island Bridge No.2 over the Ohio River, Neville Township, Bridge Rehabilitation 1,220,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $1,060,000) (Land Allocation - $10,000) (Design and Contingencies - $150,000) (3) SR 1010, Bridge over Branch of Hart's Run, Hampton Township, Bridge Replacement 146,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $106,000) (Land Allocation - $20,000) (Design and Contingencies - $20,000) (4) SR 2033, McClinton Road Bridge No.2 over a Small Stream, White Oak Borough, Bridge Rehabilitation 184,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $164,000) (Design and Contingencies - $20,000) (5) SR 0028, Bridge over Scout Reservation Road, Sharpsburg Borough, Bridge Rehabilitation 302,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $260,000) (Land Allocation - $2,000) (Design and Contingencies - $40,000) (6) SR 0028, PA 28, North Main Street Northbound over Kittanning Pike, Sharpsburg Borough, Bridge Rehabilitation 524,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $480,000) (Land Allocation - $4,000) (Design and Contingencies - $40,000) (7) Various Bridges, Bridge Rehabilitation 1,000,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $900,000) (Design and Contingencies - $100,000) (8) Saddle Pack Road Bridge over Pucketa Creek, Washington Township, Bridge Replacement 105,000 (Base Project Allocation - $70,000) (Land Allocation - $2,000) (Design and Contingencies - $33,000) (9) W. D. Mansfield Bridge (BMA 14) connecting Dravosburg and McKeesport over Monongahela River, Bridge Rehabilitation 25,000,000 (10) Library Road Bridge, Bridge Replacement 2,500,000 (11) Birmingham Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 2,500,000 (12) Flaugherty Run Bridge, Bridge Rehabilitation 1,000,000 (13) Forest Grove Bridge, Kennedy Township, Bridge Replacement 2,000,000 (14) McKees Rocks Bridge, McKees Rocks Borough, Bridge Rehabilitation 1,500,000 Section 7. Armstrong County. (a) Local Bridges (1) Rayburn Township, T-507, Bridge over Cowanshannock Creek, Bridge Replacement 159,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $123,000) (Land Allocation - $20,000) (Design and Contingencies - $16,000) (2) Cowanshannock Township, Bridge No.206 on T-722, Bridge Replacement 670,000 (Base Construction Allocation - $490,000) (Design and Contingencies - $180,000) (3) Cowanshannock Township, Bridge No.207 on T-746, Bridge Replacement 750,000 (Base Construction Allocation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean
    HIGH ALLEGHENY PLATEAU ECOREGIONAL PLAN: FIRST ITERATION Conservation Science Support—Northeast and Caribbean The High Allegheny Plan is a first iteration, a scientific assessment of the ecoregion. As part of the planning process, other aspects of the plan will be developed in future iterations, along with updates to the ecological assessment itself. These include fuller evaluations of threats to the ecoregion, constraints on conservation activities, and implementation strategies. CSS is now developing a standard template for ecoregional plans, which we have applied to the HAL first iteration draft report, distributed in 2002. Some of the HAL results have been edited or updated for this version. Click on the navigation pane to browse the report sections. What is the purpose of the report template? The purpose of creating a standard template for ecoregional plans in the Northeast is twofold: — to compile concise descriptions of methodologies developed and used for ecoregional assessment in the Northeast. These descriptions are meant to meet the needs of planning team members who need authoritative text to include in future plan documents, of science staff who need to respond to questions of methodology, and of program and state directors looking for material for general audience publications. — to create a modular resource whose pieces can be selected, incorporated in various formats, linked to in other documents, and updated easily. How does the template work? Methods are separated from results in this format, and the bulk of our work has gone into the standard methods sections. We have tried to make each methods section stand alone. Every section includes its own citation on the first page.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Catchable-Trout Stocking Program Changes by Tom Greene
    2002 Catchable-Trout Stocking Program Changes by Tom Greene photo-Art Michaels Beginning this season, the Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Com- As with past practice, changes for the 2002 season will mission will produce approximately 3.8 million adult trout include the addition of new water areas, some expansions to for distribution in the waters of the Commonwealth. In currently stocked waters, and the removal of several waters comparison with past practice, this figure represents a reduc- from the stocking program. tion of about 1.4 million trout from the 5.2 million or so stocked in 2001. New waters Pennsylvania’s state fish culture stations are currently For the 2002 season, new-water additions consist of three faced with challenges related to both water quantity and water previously stocked waters that return to the stocking program quality. To take prompt action to address these issues, it was as a result of completed dam maintenance repair and a necessary at least temporarily to reduce the number of adult landowner agreement to provide public angling. trout produced in our state hatcheries and stocked in state Cloe Lake, Jefferson County. Following a two-year waters open to free public fishing. period of drawdown for dam maintenance and repairs, this As part of this change, Commis- 25.5-acre lake is expected to be avail- sion fisheries managers have worked able for trout angling for the 2002 closely with law enforcement and season. If the water levels are re- other staff to develop a plan to real- stored according to schedule, the locate the stocking of hatchery trout lake will receive a preseason and an for the 2002 season and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • September 14, 2013 (Pages 5439-5578)
    Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 43 (2013) Repository 9-14-2013 September 14, 2013 (Pages 5439-5578) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2013 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "September 14, 2013 (Pages 5439-5578)" (2013). Volume 43 (2013). 37. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2013/37 This September is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 43 (2013) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 43 Number 37 Saturday, September 14, 2013 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 5439—5578 Agencies in this issue The Courts Department of Banking and Securities Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Department of Education Department of Environmental Protection Department of Health Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of State Environmental Hearing Board Environmental Quality Board Fish and Boat Commission Insurance Department Pennsylvania Alzheimer’s Disease Planning Committee Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology Detailed list of contents appears inside. Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporters (Master Transmittal Sheets): No. 466, September 2013 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- BULLETIN reau, 641 Main Capitol Building, Harrisburg, Pa. 17120, (ISSN 0162-2137) under the policy supervision and direction of the Joint Committee on Documents pursuant to Part II of Title 45 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (relating to publi- cation and effectiveness of Commonwealth Documents).
    [Show full text]
  • Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania
    Mine Water Resources of the Anthracite Coal Fields of Eastern Pennsylvania In partnership with the following major contributors and Technical Committee Organizations represented: The United States Geological Survey, PA Water Science Center Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., LLC (posthumously) Susquehanna River Basin Commission Dauphin County Conservation District Ian C. Palmer-Researcher PA Department of Environmental Protection-- Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation, Bureau of Deep Mine Safety, & Pottsville District Mining Office MINE WATER RESOURCES OF THE ANTHRACITE REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA Foreword: Dedication to Roger J. Hornberger, P.G. (Robert E. Hughes) PART 1. Mine Water of the Anthracite Region Chapter 1. Introduction to the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, and Roger J. Hornberger, P.G.) Chapter 2. Geology of the Anthracite Coal Region (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., Caroline M. Loop, Keith B.C. Brady, P.G., Nathan A. Houtz, P.G.) Chapter 3. Colliery Development in the Anthracite Coal Fields (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., David L. Williams, Daniel J. Koury and Keith A. Laslow, P.G.) Chapter 4. A Geospatial Approach to Mapping the Anthracite Coal Fields (Michael A. Hewitt, Robert E. Hughes & Maynard L. (Mike) Dunn, Jr., P.G.) Chapter 5. The Development and Demise of Major Mining in the Northern Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Roger J. Hornberger, P.G., and Michael A. Hewitt) Chapter 6. The Development of Mining and Mine Drainage Tunnels of the Eastern Middle Anthracite Coal Field (Robert E. Hughes, Michael A. Hewitt, Jerrald Hollowell. P.G., Keith A. Laslow, P.G., and Roger J.
    [Show full text]
  • Triad Expansion Project
    20160615-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 06/15/2016 Office of Energy Energy ProjectsTennessee June 2016 Federal RegulatoryCommission Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. Docket No. CP15-520-000 Triad Expansion Project Environmental Assessment Washington, DC 20426 20160615-4002 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 06/15/2016 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 OFFICE OF ENERGY PROJECTS In Reply Refer To: OEP/DG2E/Gas 2 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. Docket No. CP15-520-000 TO THE PARTY ADDRESSED: The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared this environmental assessment (EA) for the Triad Expansion Project (Project) proposed by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Tennessee) in the above-referenced docket. Tennessee requests authorization to construct pipeline facilities in Pennsylvania to provide up to 180,000 dekatherms per day of new natural gas delivery capacity. The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of the Project in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. The FERC staff concludes that approval of the proposed Project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Tennessee’s proposed Project involves construction of approximately 7.0 miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline; a new pig1 launcher, crossover, and connecting facilities at the beginning of the proposed pipeline; a new pig receiver; and a new odorant facility and ancillary piping at Tennessee’s existing Compressor Station 321. FERC staff mailed copies of the EA to federal, state, and local government representatives and agencies; elected officials; public interest groups; Native American tribes; potentially affected landowners and other interested individuals and groups; newspapers and libraries in the project area; and parties to this proceeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - November 2018
    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - November 2018 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 7.91 Armstrong Birch Run Allegheny River Headwaters dnst to mouth 41.033300 -79.619414 1.10 Armstrong Bullock Run North Fork Pine Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.879723 -79.441391 1.81 Armstrong Cornplanter Run Buffalo Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.754444 -79.671944 1.76 Armstrong Cove Run Sugar Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.987652 -79.634421 2.59 Armstrong Crooked Creek Allegheny River Headwaters to conf Pine Rn 40.722221 -79.102501 8.18 Armstrong Foundry Run Mahoning Creek Lake Headwaters
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study
    Feasibility Study of Economics and Performance of a Hydroelectric Installation at the Jeddo Mine Drainage Tunnel A Study Prepared in Partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites Joseph Owen Roberts and Gail Mosey Produced under direction of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) under Interagency Agreement IAG-09-1719 and Task No WFD3.1000. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-7A30-51321 February 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Feasibility Study of Economics and Performance of a Hydroelectric Installation at the Jeddo Mine Drainage Tunnel A Study Prepared in Partnership with the Environmental Protection Agency for the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: Siting Renewable Energy on Potentially Contaminated Land and Mine Sites Joseph Owen Roberts and Gail Mosey Prepared under Task No. WFD3.1000 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-7A30-51321 Golden, CO 80401 February 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This manuscript has been authored by employees of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC (“Alliance”) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 with the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) – Jan 2015
    Appendix D: Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) – Jan 2015 Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - Jan 2015 Lower Lower Length County Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Limit Lat Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Marsh Creek Not Recorded Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 7.91 Armstrong Bullock Run North Fork Pine Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.879723 -79.441391 1.81 Armstrong Cornplanter Run Buffalo Creek Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.754444 -79.671944 1.76 Armstrong Crooked Creek Allegheny River Headwaters to conf Pine Rn 40.722221 -79.102501 8.18 Armstrong Foundry Run Mahoning Creek Lake Headwaters dnst to mouth 40.910416 -79.221046 2.43 Armstrong Glade Run Allegheny River Headwaters dnst to second trib upst from mouth 40.767223 -79.566940 10.51 Armstrong Glade Run Mahoning Creek Lake Headwaters
    [Show full text]
  • Twelve Year Program State Transportation August 2018 Commission
    2019 Twelve Year Program State Transportation August 2018 Commission Tom Wolf Governor Leslie S. Richards Secretary, PA Department of Transportation Chairperson, State Transportation Commission For More Information: Phone: (717) 783-2262 James D. Ritzman, P.E. Website: www.TalkPATransportation.com Deputy Secretary for Planning StateState Transportation Transportation Commission Commission 20192019 Twelve Twelve Year Year Program Program ABOUT THE PENNSYLVANIA State Transportation Commission The Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission (STC) is comprised of 15 members and is chaired by the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). As the board of directors to PennDOT, the STC is charged with the high-level evaluation of Pennsylvania’s transportation system and provides policy-driven direction with respect to the development of the Twelve Year Transportation Program. Capitol Building in Harrisburg, Dauphin County i TABLE of Contents About the Pennsylvania State Transportation Commission.................................................................i Message from the Chair, State Transportation Commission................................................................1 Transportation Planning in PA.....................................................................................................................2 The Twelve Year Program Process............................................................................................................3 Planning and Prioritizing Projects........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]