Annual Report 2020 2 Our Freight Offering DFDS Annual Report 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2020 2 Our Freight Offering DFDS Annual Report 2020 Photo: In 2020, DFDS moved extraordinary freight volumes as Brexit and Covid-19 congested ports DFDS A/S · Sundkrogsgade 11, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø · T +45 3342 3342 · F +45 3342 3311 · dfds.com · CVR 14 19 47 11 Annual Report 2020 2 Our freight offering DFDS Annual Report 2020 Our freight DFDS’ key freight offering market offerings We keep Europe moving Ferry transport of freight Select industry solutions: through a wide range of units, accompanied and Automotive, Forest & Metal, freight services from unaccompanied Cold Chain and others ferry transport to complex logistics solutions Port rail services Port terminal services 70 27 ferries and other routes Contract logistics Industry solutions, vessels solutions asset-backed and 4PL 8 50 Door-door forwarding, port logistics full & part loads terminals locations and containers 3 Our passenger offering DFDS Annual Report 2020 Our passenger offering DFDS’ key passenger offerings We move people and their cars on ferry routes to enjoy a maritime experience and connect Short sea ferry Overnight ferry with others 17 9 Mini cruise Groups & events ferries ferry routes Packaged Conferences 23,000 breaks at sea sailings 4 Our Win23 strategy DFDS Annual Report 2020 Our Win23 strategy Develop and Grow solutions Digitise services Create more expand the ferry to select to accelerate value for A B C and logistics D industries growth passengers networks 5 Our purpose DFDS Annual Report 2020 Our purpose By moving freight and passengers reliably and efficiently, we provide vital services for trade and travel in and around Europe. We care – about the safety of our We seek to partner and innovate passengers and employees and about our with customers to grow their business environmental footprint. and the economy. 6 Our climate action plan DFDS Annual Report 2020 Our climate action plan Short-term plan 2030 target Long-term plan 2050 target Reduce CO² emissions from Reduction of relative CO² emis- Planning of zero emission Climate neutral existing fleet responsible for sions from fleet by 45% from newbuilds to start in 2025 +90% of our total emissions 2008 baseline Ensure green fuel availability through partnerships Getting our house in order Reduction of the 10% of emissions that are non-fleet: trucks, travel, company cars, buildings, and more 7 Content DFDS Annual Report 2020 Management review Consolidated financials Parent company financials 8 Key results 61 Income statement 118 Income statement 9 Letter from the Chair 62 Statement of comprehensive income 119 Statement of comprehensive income 10 CEO looks ahead 63 Balance sheet 120 Balance sheet 11 Key figures 64 Statement of changes in equity 121 Statement of changes in equity 12 Management review 65 Statement of cash flows 123 Statement of cash flows 27 Ferry Division 67 Notes 124 Notes 33 Logistics Division 38 Sustainability summary Reports Other information 44 Risk factors 114 Management statement 141 Fleet list 48 The DFDS share and shareholders 115 Independent Auditors report 143 Glossary 51 Financial review 144 Definitions 55 Corporate governance summary 145 DFDS’ history 58 Board of Directors and Executive Board 59 Executive Management Team 8 Management review DFDS Annual Report 2020 Key results 2020 Revenue down 16% to EBITDA¹ down 25% to Return on invested capital¹ The results for 2020 include DKK 14bn DKK 2.7bn after tax of 4% a significant negative impact from the Covid-19 ¹ ¹ Revenue per division EBITDA per division Return on invested capital (ROIC) pandemic on the Group’s DKK bn DKK bn % passenger activities that generated 16% of revenue 16 3.5 16 in 2019. Due to the imposed travel restrictions, the 14 3.0 14 EBITDA from passenger activities was reduced by 12 12 2.5 DKK 1bn compared to 2019. 10 2.0 10 Logistics Division 8 1.5 8 Ferry Division 6 1.0 6 Non-allocated items DFDS Group 4 0.5 4 2 0.0 2 1 Before special items 2 2018 restated to IFRS 16 on 0 -0.5 0 a proforma and unaudited basis 2018 2019 2020 2018² 2019 2020 2018² 2019 2020 9 Letter from the Chair DFDS Annual Report 2020 Rough seas in 2020 – may 2021 bring calmer waters and new opportunities I look back on 2020 with mixed emotions. On the one Financial position and dividend tainty, particularly about the effects of Brexit on UK trade hand, Covid-19 severely disrupted our lives and parts of In last year’s annual report, it was announced that dividend volumes as well as when and to what extent passengers our business. On the other hand, our ability to adapt to the payments would resume. Following the outbreak of Covid-19, will return in larger numbers to our ferry routes. changed circumstances proved the strength of the DFDS the proposed dividend was cancelled to safeguard our finan- In the meantime, I am confident and have faith in DFDS’ organisation and the resilience of our business model. cial position. We consolidated our financial position post the ability to adapt to market changes as well as a firm belief Adapting to such a severe event as Covid-19 did, however, outbreak and today our position is solid. Leverage remains, in our Win23 strategic roadmap and ambitions. The acqui- entail significant actions and costs, not least for the people however, well above our targeted range and the Board there- sition of HSF Logistics Group is a testament to this belief we had to let go due to the sudden drop in demand across fore proposes not to pay a dividend in 2021. and management’s commitment to deliver on the strategy. markets, especially in the passenger segment. In addition, the efficiency and improvement measures Claus V. Hemmingsen Management’s resolute adaptation of activities Breakthrough year for climate carried out in 2020 has positioned us well to both manage Chair of DFDS’ mitigated the impact on EBITDA, however, still with 2020 was a breakthrough year for the climate agenda in challenges and pursue opportunities in 2021. Board of Directors a 25% decrease to DKK 2.7bn. As the year evolved, the world of business. It’s now all about how and when we freight demand rose to levels above 2019 helped by become climate-neutral, not if. We launched our own climate Finally, thank you! stock building in the UK ahead of Brexit while passenger action plan that includes numerous projects to reduce our DFDS has emerged in good shape from 2020 due to volumes remained almost at a standstill. The decrease footprint over the next ten years as well as an ambition to an extraordinary and impressive effort from the entire in earnings was in the end caused by the drop in replace fossil fuel with sustainable fuels to achieve climate organisation. The cost has regrettably been significant passenger volumes. neutrality by 2050. For several years, a lot of effort has in both human and financial terms. I am grateful for the At the start of 2020, five of six members of the Execu- gone into developing our approach to sustainability and the great cooperation with our stakeholders, not least our tive Management Team were new in their roles or had just climate action plan is the preliminary culmination of this customers as well as our business and financial partners. joined. It was thus a new and untried team that faced the work. I am optimistic and encouraged by our green agenda. I extend my deepfelt gratitude to management and Covid-19 crisis. I am impressed with their ability to quickly staff for your support and efforts in overcoming the many rise to the challenge, how fast they got together and the Strategic roadmap in place challenges of 2020. Hopefully 2021 will bring calmer way they managed DFDS skilfully through a difficult period. Going into 2021, we face an elevated level of uncer- waters and new opportunities to all. 10 CEO letter DFDS Annual Report 2020 Managing through challenges and opportunities Our focus in 2020 was to serve our stakeholders as well relevant and ambitious roadmap. Our commitment Looking ahead and thank you! as possible through a period of great uncertainty. To keep to deliver on the Win23 growth ambitions was Our freight business proved to be strong and resilient our colleagues safe. To maintain service and reliability to underlined by the recent agreement to acquire HSF during 2020. In addition, Brexit is now behind us and customers. To collaborate with partners. To maintain a Logistics Group. we can focus on our long term growth opportunities strong financial position that keeps DFDS safe. Our financial ambitions are refocused on ROIC as in the UK. Uncertainty remains, however, elevated Looking back on 2020, Covid-19’s disruption of our the pandemic and other events have lowered the return going into 2021. How quickly will trade normalise passenger services stands out. A sad consequence of the to a level that is not satisfactory. Our ROIC minimum between the EU and the UK? When and to what extent Torben Carlsen pandemic was laying off around 700 competent and loyal target is 8% while the ambition of Win23 is to reach a will passengers return to our ferry routes? We cannot President & CEO employees as we adapted to the new market conditions. ROIC of 10% in 2023 compared to 4% in 2020. predict the outcomes of these key questions but Disruptions nevertheless also bring opportunities. We we are prepared to respond to any challenges and forged a commercially stronger and more focused freight Climate action plan launched opportunities that will arise during the year. More information on sales organisation in the adaptation process, and have A highlight of 2020 was the launch of our ambition I would like to send a warm, huge thank you to our approach to already achieved important customer wins.
Recommended publications
  • WP3 1 Cor1 Rosyth Zeebrugge Ferry Service Business Impact Study November 2011
    Rosyth – Zeebrugge Ferry Service: Business Impacts – Data Refresh Final Report November 2011 The Spyria Partnership Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF WORK 3 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT 4 2 ROSYTH – ZEEBRUGGE FERRY SERVICE 5 2.1 INTRODUCTION 5 2.2 IMPACT OF A NEW CONNECTION BETWEEN SCOTLAND AND EUROPE 5 2.3 CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE ROSYTH – ZEEBRUGGE FERRY SERVICE 6 2.4 CURRENT SERVICE PROVISION 7 2.5 VOLUMES AND KEY CUSTOMERS 8 2.6 FUNDING SUPPORT 10 3 HAULAGE INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES 12 3.1 INTRODUCTION 12 3.2 WORKSHOP WITH RHA MEMBERS 12 3.3 SURVEY OF MAJOR SCOTTISH HAULIERS 12 3.4 VOLUMES, ROUTES AND JOURNEY TIMES 13 3.5 DECISION-MAKING AND CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENTS 15 3.6 BENEFITS OF THE FERRY SERVICE 15 3.7 FACTORS INFLUENCING ROUTE DECISION-MAKING 16 3.8 FUNDING AND SUPPORT 19 3.9 KEY FACTORS INHIBITING USAGE OF THE FERRY SERVICE 19 3.10 WHAT ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO GROW VOLUMES 19 4 BUSINESS SECTOR PERSPECTIVES 20 4.1 INTRODUCTION 20 4.2 OVERVIEW OF SCOTTISH MANUFACTURING SECTORS 20 4.3 BUSINESS SECTOR DECISION-MAKING AND IMPACTS 26 4.4 CONCLUSIONS 27 5 CONCLUSIONS 28 5.1 INTRODUCTION 28 5.2 KEY AREAS FOR CONSIDERATION 28 5.3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 30 APPENDIX A – QUESTIONNAIRE 31 2 | R o s y t h – Zeebrugge Ferry S e r v i c e – Business Impact Refresh The Spyria Partnership 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction SEStran is a key partner in the Food Port Project, which is an Interreg IVB North Sea Region project, funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
    [Show full text]
  • The Retrofit Project
    The Retrofit Project Retrofitting to reduce CO2 emission – a case study of three different vessels www. greenship.org The Retrofit Project This report is a product of a Green Ship of the Future It is intended to inspire for a financial sustainable collaboration, supported by The Danish Maritime way to invest in green solutions that minimize the Fund. The objective of this project is to explore the energy need and thereby our impact on the earth. potential of today's available and proven technolo- Furthermore, it is meant as an inspiration for ship- gies to reduce emissions and energy consumption. owners on where and how to look for fuel reduction potential, both on existing vessels and when plan- ning future fleets. Project partners Read more about the participating partners at the end of the report. Retrofit Series 2020 2 HAFNIA LISE VICTORIA SEAWAYS MAERSK TIANJIN Executive Summary The arguably most pressing environmental impact emitted per year. This is due to a different operation- from shipping, is the emission of greenhouse gas al pattern. While, there are differences between the (GHG) – especially the emission of CO2. It is evident individual vessels and participating providers ana- that implementation of a GHG neutral fuel is neces- lyzing the cases, and it is therefore not possible to sary, from both an environmental, climate and com- directly compare them, there were several general pliance perspective, but it is also evident that it will learnings that can be drawn. These are elaborated be years before we can rely purely on sustainable in the conclusion. It is vital to mention that there are sources of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Media Guide to European Ferry Travel 2013
    The Media Guide to European Ferry Travel 2013 www.aferry.co.uk/offers Inside: • The latest routes & prices • Free ferry apps • Customer ferry reviews • Free wine offers 12:26 PM Back Resultsttss Dover to Calais some extra text too begin my Carrier testing to see the font size and whatat it should 27 Aug 2012 27 Aug 2012 £ 12:34 PM PMPM The World’s Leading Ferry Website 13:55 13:25 Dover Calais £75.00£75.0075 00 16:25 13:55 From: Calais Dover Dover 1h 30m 1h 30m To: 14:20 14:50 Calais App now available Dover Calais £80.00800.0000 17:25 15:55 Calais Dover Depart: 1h 30m 1h 30m 15 Jun 2012 at 15:00 15:30 Return: 0930 for iPhone & Android mobiles Dover Calais £85.000 14 Feb 2012 at 1800 18:25 17:55 Calais Dover 1h 30m 1h 30m Passengers: ONN 16:55 16:25 x 2 Dover Dunkerque £90.00 V x 1 16:25 13:55 ehicle: Dunkerque Dover 1h 30m 1h 30m SEARCH Finding The Best Ferry Deal Has Never Been Easier Ferry Useful Information Online 24/7 Use our one stop shop - To search, compare and book. Search AFerry for: With AFerry, you have access to the largest selection of ferries in Europe and beyond. Up to the minute ferry news. For all ferry routes and more: Fantastic prices and offers all year round. www.aferry.co.uk/ferry-routes.htm Compare the prices of ferries to Choose from all the famous ferry Our top tips to get the cheapest ferries.
    [Show full text]
  • Third-Country Tourists on the Ferries Linking Germany with Lithuania
    Third-Country Tourists on the Ferries Linking Germany with Lithuania Eleri Jones, Ramunas Povilanskas, Ausrine Armaitiene’ Gediminas Valtas & Egidijus Jurkus Recreation and Tourism Department, Klaipeda University, Lithuania, and Cardiff School of Management, Cardiff Metropolitan University, UK Abstract This paper examines third-country passengers’ travel itineraries on the DFDS Seaways ferry route linking Kiel, Germany with Klaipeda, Lithuania using a mixed-methods approach comprising qualitative and quantitative methods, including geographical information system spatial-cluster analysis. Survey results reveal the predominant third- country passenger groups (i.e. passengers from countries other than Germany and Lithuania) on ferries sailing from Kiel to Klaipeda and back were Latvian (28%), Dutch (20%), British (14%) and Danish (12%) nationals; 86% of Latvian passengers used the ferry to travel between home in Latvia and work in Western Europe. Western European passengers comprised a diverse segment of motorized tourists using the ferry in summer to reach the Baltic States faster than by land. The paper highlights the role of the Kiel– Klaipeda ferry route within the Baltic Sea motorized tourism circuit linking the Baltic and Nordic countries with Western Europe. Key Words: Baltic Sea, ferry lines, motorized tourism circuit, third-country tourists, tourismscape, triangulation Introduction Ferry tourism (Duval, 2007; Gibbons, 1996) is a relatively obscure phenomenon with limited literature available in comparison with other industry sectors, such as leisure, tourism and transportation (e.g. motorized and cruise tourism, shipping). While analysing power relationships between hosts and guests aboard an English Channel ferry, Gibbons (1996, p. 7) noted that ferry tourism: “despite its prominent place within the tourism industry, has been much neglected in the literature ..
    [Show full text]
  • Ferry Routes & Logistics
    Change the color of the angle, choose between the four colors FERRY ROUTES & LOGISTICS DFDS Group Overview in the top menu Enter the date in the field September 2018 WHAT WE DO . 2 We move freight and passengers on 23 ferry routes in Europe and Turkey 3 It’s all about the routes – and their location 4 Routes are part of Europe’s and Turkey’s infrastructure And part of business supply chains 5 We mainly move fast moving freight for delivery same day, next day or day after (A,B,C) 85% of carried volumes are trailers 6 Our key freight customers are forwarders and hauliers Manufacturers of heavy goods are also important customers 7 On 9 routes we move freight and passengers together 8 People travelling by car are our key customers as is cruise passengers Both for holiday and transport purposes 9 We also provide transport and logistics solutions to a wide range of businesses 10 Freight, logistics & pax – northern Europe & Mediterranean Freight routes Logistics solutions Passenger routes ▪ Trailers, unaccompanied ▪ Door-door full & ▪ Overnight Key & accompanied part loads services ▪ Day ▪ Industry solutions ▪ Contract logistics ▪ Transport/holiday ▪ Port terminals ▪ Cruise ferry Freight Share of Group 45% 20% revenue 80% freight 20% pax 11 Roll on, roll off • Ro-ro/ro-pax shipping: roll on, roll off of freight units and passenger cars • Routes carry both unaccompanied and accompanied trailers • Other types of cargo, e.g. heavy industrial goods and containers, are placed on carrying equipment (mafis) and tugged on to the ship 12 Change the color of the angle, choose between the four colors FERRY TYPES Day ferry (ro-pax), Channel in the top menu Enter the date in the field Freight ferry (ro-ro) Cruise ferry Combined freight and passenger ferry (ro-pax) STRUCTURE & PERFORMANCE .
    [Show full text]
  • BLÜCHER Marine References
    BLÜCHER Marine References Country Project Shipyard Owner Vessel Type Hull no. Year Argentina Frigate Naval Shipyard Frigate Frigate Refitting 2005 Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 361 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 362 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 363 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 364 2013 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 365 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 366 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 367 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Customs and Austal Ships Australian Customs and Border Cape Class Patrol Boat 368 2014 Border Protection Service Protection Service Australia Australian Defence Civmec/ASC Australian Defence OPV OPV1 2019 Australia Australian Defence - ASC Shipyard Australian Defence Air Warfare Destroyer 2012 AWD Australia Australian Defence - LHD BAE Systems Australian Defence Landing Helicpoter 2012 Dock Australia Dick Smith Tenix Dick Smith Ocean Research Ulysses Blue 2005 Vessel Australia Esso West Tuna Esso Platform 1996 Australia HMAS Arunta BAE Systems Australian Defence ANZAC Frigate ANZAC 2019 Australia Jean de la Valette - Virtu Austal Ships Virtu Ferries High Speed Ferry 248 2010 Ferries Australia RNZN Tenix RNZN Ocean Research 42826 2006 Vessel Australia Taylor Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Leading Danish Companies Join Forces On
    Supported by 26 May 2020 Press release Leading Danish companies join forces on an ambitious sustainable fuel project Copenhagen Airports, A.P. Moller - Maersk, DSV Panalpina, DFDS, SAS and Ørsted have formed the first partnership of its kind to develop an industrial-scale production facility to produce sustainable fuels for road, maritime and air transport in the Copenhagen area. The partnership brings together the demand and supply side of sustainable fuels with a vision to realise what could become one of the world’s largest electrolyser and sustainable fuel production facilities. The project can spearhead the maturation of sustainable fuels while creating jobs and new value chains to reinforce Denmark’s role as a green energy leader. Copenhagen Airports, A.P. Moller - Maersk, DSV Panalpina, DFDS, SAS and Ørsted have brought together the demand and supply side of sustainable fuels in a unique partnership with the concrete vision to develop a new ground-breaking hydrogen and e-fuel production facility as soon as 2023. When fully scaled-up by 2030, the project could deliver more than 250,000 tonnes of sustainable fuel for busses, trucks, maritime vessels, and airplanes every year. Production would potentially be based on a total electrolyser capacity of 1.3 gigawatts, which would likely make it one of the world’s largest facilities of its kind. The production from the fully scaled facility can reduce annual carbon emissions by 850,000 tonnes. COWI and BCG act as knowledge partners for the project, and the project is supported by the Municipality of Copenhagen in line with Copenhagen’s ambitious policies for decarbonisation.
    [Show full text]
  • DFDS SEAWAYS LOCATION Grimsby, Lincolnshire, UK BUSINESS SECTOR Freight Shipping SIZE DFDS Group: 6,600 Staff VEHICLES the Humber Viking’S 1.4MW Mitsubishi Generator
    DFDS SEAWAYS LOCATION Grimsby, Lincolnshire, UK BUSINESS SECTOR Freight shipping SIZE DFDS Group: 6,600 staff VEHICLES The Humber Viking’s 1.4MW Mitsubishi generator CHALLENGES FACED 1. The oil in the Humber Viking’s generator was being badly “The filter diluted by fuel. This necessitated oil changes every 250 hours, system represents leading to excessive oil use and maintenance costs exceeding the most £15,000 per annum. cost effective 2. The oil dilution increased engine wear and threatened way to generator reliability. remove fuel dilution from the oil in the Humber Viking’s SOLUTIONS DELIVERED generator. 1. The oil drain interval was safely extended to 1,000 hours by fitting an Extended Oil Life System (EOLS). This unit removed Plug it in, problem solved. the fuel dilution through a combined process of evaporation ” DFDS Chief Engineer and filtration. 2. Engine additive levels and viscosities were kept at optimum levels to maintain lubrication and ensure the reliable operation of the main generator. TECHNICAL GOOD SENSE REMOVING FUEL DILUTION After installing the EOLS the level of fuel dilution dropped steadily from 3.5% to a perfectly safe 0.5%. The EOLS’ protein-rich 1µm cotton element removes the fuel’s heavier hydro-carbons while the evaporation chamber removes and vents lighter hydro-carbons. 4.0 % 3.5 % 3.0 % 2.5 % 2.0 % Fuel Dilution 1.5 % 1.0 % 0.5 % 0.0 % 1 hour 250 hours 500 hours 750 hours 1,000 hours MAINTAINING FLUID PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Over the same extended service period the oil’s Total Base Number (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Imdo Netherlands 2009 Layout 1
    Netherlands December 2009 SHIPPING REVIEW INTRODUCTION with rising fuel costs and a reduced demand due in deteriorating The Netherlands is among Ireland’s top 10 trading partners and global markets. In 2007 Xpress Containerline ceased a service serves as the gateway to Europe and the rest of the world for from Shannon Foynes to Rotterdam due to the long distance Irish manufactured goods. Netherlands has a very open between both ports compounded by the adverse affects of economy which relies heavily on foreign trade. The economy is weather and delays. Europe Lines also ceased its service between noted for stable industrial relations, moderate unemployment Drogheda and Rotterdam. and inflation, a sizable current account surplus and an important role as the European transportation hub. Industrial At the end of 2008 capacity on routes to the Netherlands were activity is predominantly in food processing, chemicals, reduced significantly as a result of the decline in demand brought petroleum refining, and electrical machinery. The pace of job on by the economic downturn. BG freightline restructured most growth reached a 10-year high in 2007, but economic growth of their shipping routes between Ireland and The Netherlands. fell sharply in 2008 as fallout from the world financial crisis Southampton was removed from the 400 TEU Belfast- Greenock constricted demand and raised the specter of a recession in - Rotterdam route, and capacity was reduced on the Dublin - 2009. As a gateway to Europe and the rest of the world for Irish Rotterdam -Felixstowe route from 750 TEU to 300 TEU. An goods, there are many Shortsea shipping services between additional vessel was added to the Dublin - Rotterdam route, Ireland and the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 HELCOM Overview on Port Reception Facilities (PRF)
    Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Cooperation Platform on Special Area According to MARPOL CP PRF 7-2017 Annex IV (CP PRF) Hamburg, Germany, 13 September 2017 Document 2 2017 HELCOM Overview on Port Reception Facilities (PRF) Background This document contains a draft update of the PRF Overview with new data for the year 2016. Information received from the Contracting Parties has been included in this update. Information on the following 25 ports has been updated: Copenhagen, Tallinn, Helsinki, Stockholm, Rostock, Kiel, Gothenburg, Klaipeda, Riga, Gdynia, Gdansk, Visby, Lübeck, Malmö, Wismar, Saaremaa, Helsingborg, Szczecin, Ventspils, Stralsund, Trelleborg, Liepaja, Turku, Nynäshamn and Kapellskär. Action requested The Meeting is invited to: take note of the status of updating the port specific information in the HELCOM PRF Overview provide further corrections and updates as needed. Page 1 of 1 Contents of 2017 PRF overview Saint Petersburg (Russia) ............................................................................................................................... 3 Copenhagen (Denmark) [updated in 2017] .............................................................................................. 5 Tallinn (Estonia) [updated in 2017] ............................................................................................................. 8 Helsinki (Finland) [updated in 2017] ........................................................................................................ 11 Stockholm (Sweden) [updated
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/M.2838 - P & O STENA LINE (HOLDING) LIMITED
    EN Case No COMP/M.2838 - P & O STENA LINE (HOLDING) LIMITED Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/08/2002 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 302M2838 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 07/08/2002 SG (2002) D/231113 PUBLIC VERSION In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article MERGER PROCEDURE 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information To the notifying parties omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.2838 - P&O/P&O Stena Line Notification of 05.07.2002 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 4064/891 1. On 5 July 2002 the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/89, whereby The Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Company (P&O) would acquire full control over P&O Stena Line (Holdings) Limited (“P&OSL), in which P&O already has 60% of the share capital, and Stena Line (UK) Limited (“Stena Line UK”) has 40%. I. THE PARTIES 2. P&O is a UK listed parent company of a diversified group with interests including international container terminal operations, ferry services for freight and passengers, logistics and cargo shipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Copenhagen - Frederikshavn - Oslo
    COPENHAGEN - FREDERIKSHAVN - OSLO Schedule December 2020 / January 2021 OSL-FDH/CPH v.v. Sailing schedule December 2020 From From Date Day From Oslo Copenhagen Frederikshavn 1st December Tuesday 14:15 23:45 2nd December Wednesday 14:15 3rd December Thursday 14:15 23:45 4th December Friday 14:15 5th December Saturday 14:15 23:45 6th December Sunday 14:15 7th December Monday 14:15 23:45 8th December Tuesday 14:15 9th December Wednesday 14:15 23:45 10th December Thursday 14:15 11th December Friday 14:15 23:45 12th December Saturday 14:15 13th December Sunday 14:15 23:45 14th December Monday 14:15 15th December Tuesday 14:15 23:45 16th December Wednesday 14:15 17th December Thursday 14:15 23:45 18th December Friday 14:15 19th December Saturday 14:15 23:45 20th December Sunday 14:15 21st December Monday 14:15 23:45 22nd December Tuesday 14:15 23rd December Wednesday 14:15 23:45 24th December Thursday 14:00* 25th December Friday 26th December Saturday 14:15 23:45 27th December Sunday 14:15 28th December Monday 14:15 23:45 29th December Tuesday 14:15 30th December Wednesday 14:15 23:45 31st December Thursday 16:30** * 24/12 Please note that this voyage is Oslo-Copenhagen only. No sailing Oslo-Frederikshavn. Departure from Oslo at 14:00. Arrival to Copenhagen at 09:45 the next day. ** 31/12 Please note that this voyage is Oslo-Copenhagen only. No sailing Oslo-Frederikshavn. Departure from Oslo at 16:30 and arrival to Copenhagen at 11:00 the next day.
    [Show full text]