DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Annual Report 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Consortium for Ocean Leadership (COL) is a community-based WHO WE ARE organization working to ensure sound science underpins ocean policy and decision-making at the federal level. As the voice of the ocean science and technology community, COL is the trusted resource for policymakers seeking credible information about ocean challenges and opportunities, societal impacts, and science-based solutions. Together, COL members give ocean research and funding priorities a voice at the federal level — and keep them national priorities. Our strong reputation enables us to magnify our members’ ability to shape the future of ocean science and technology. Beyond advocacy, COL believes that fully understanding our ocean — to ensure its health and our own, to sustainably manage its resources, to provide protection from its threats — is a tremendous endeavor that will benefit all Americans, requiring strong partnerships and leadership beyond the scope of what a single institution or sector can do alone. Both in the past, through such COL-managed initiatives as the Census of Marine Life, and today, our work focuses on convening the ocean science community across every sector around these critical science questions and initiatives, bringing diverse sectors and disciplines together to provide science and solutions for mutual benefit. OUR VISION Our vision is a global society that views its own well-being as intimately connected to the ocean. We are a consortium of the leading ocean science and technology institutions from academia, aquariums, and industry. Based in Washington, D.C., COL advances ocean research, innovation, education, and sound policy as it positions the ocean science community for success. OUR MISSION COL shapes the future of ocean science and technology through discovery, understanding, and action, by: Supporting DISCOVERY of the physical, biological, and chemical properties of the ocean critical to life on our planet Building UNDERSTANDING and educating society on the ocean’s influence on human life Taking ACTION to influence policymakers to advance ocean science, education, and marine policy 2 DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION (DEI) STRATEGIC MISSION STATEMENT The ocean sciences are severely lacking diversity, and action must be taken to make the field more diverse, equitable, and inclusive. As a community-based organization, COL has an opportunity to demonstrate leadership in this critical effort, given our unique work spanning the ocean science community from the ocean-STEM pipeline to public and private ocean shareholders. COL strives to accomplish our mission to shape the future of ocean science and technology through discovery, understanding, and action while fully embodying DEI values. If we are to achieve this mission, we must take action against discrimination and harassment; leverage our position to promote all aspects of DEI; amplify the voices of people and organizations that are tirelessly working in support of these efforts; and actively engage more diverse participation in our community. Our organization’s mission cannot be achieved without this, to the detriment of the ocean sciences and society as a whole. All ocean scientists, no matter their background, should support diversity; diverse perspectives lead to better science. COL is committed to transparency and accountability around our internal and external initiatives concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion, and to effecting positive change in our own internal policies and procedures, through our community influence, and in the design of our programs and initiatives. 3 A NOTE FROM OUR PRESIDENT AND CEO: BETWEEN PANDEMIC BLUES AND THE DEEP BLUE SEA At the beginning of 2020, the year looked bright. Fresh off an energizing regional partnership workshop we held in Monterey, the Monterey Ocean Science and Technology (MOST) Summit, in January and several successful town halls at the Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020 in February, our momentum was carrying us towards what would surely be our best Public Policy Forum yet as well as a special NOSB Finals in the Gulf that would coincide with the 10-year anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Then, the spread of COVID-19 across the United States and the rest of the world suddenly went from a distant worry to an imminent danger. Like so many people, we left our offices on a Thursday not knowing we wouldn’t be back in that building the following Monday, or any of the Mondays to follow. Jonathan W. White But now, having weathered the storm that was 2020 and with the benefit of RADM (Ret.), USN hindsight (since hindsight is, of course, 2020), I’m astonished at and proud of all the amazing things the ocean science community accomplished this year. Supporting the reauthorization of the National Oceanographic Partnership Program and other legislation that recognizes the importance of the ocean; successfully transitioning NOSB Finals to a virtual format with only a month’s notice; taking the first steps towards a truly national, multisector ocean exploration enterprise in the United States; advancing the OceanObs’19 Living Action Plan to transform global ocean understanding; building new partnerships around the development and use of uncrewed systems in ocean science — this seems to be a pretty impressive list of ocean accomplishments in a year that was defined by a global pandemic. We did it, though, thanks to the resilience and perseverance of our members and our ocean science champions, and especially the heroic staff of COL. Amidst global turmoil and, at times, great personal grief, our consortium of ocean leaders turned a truly dismal year into one filled with shared progress and success. Looking to the future, I am hopeful that this momentum behind the cause of a healthy, well understood ocean carries into 2021 and beyond. On top of our accomplishments, 2020 also brought about a sea change in the ocean science community with regards to our commitment as institutions and individuals to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Many members of our community have worked tirelessly on advancing DEI goals for years, but the ocean science community as a whole is finally embracing and taking responsibility for the importance of centering DEI in every aspect of our work, from the research process to the climate of our workplaces. Even seemingly minor changes will have huge impacts: At a workshop we hosted this summer to generate recommendations for one of NOAA’s key science and technology focus areas, the entire focus area was renamed “Uncrewed Systems” from “Unmanned” to be more inclusive. While it may seem small, this will set the tone for this critical technology area going forward, and I hope to see more changes like this, since we still have a lot to do. Even with all the uncertainty around the post-pandemic future, I remain optimistic that science will chart the course to a much brighter future for us and our ocean. The success of any voyage, however, relies upon leadership and teamwork to sail successfully along the charted course. COL is an organization that is designed to enable this leadership and teamwork across the broad, multisector “oceanscape” of science and technology that our members represent, along with our colleagues throughout the ocean community. I know that COL is ready to embark on this voyage and sail ahead smartly with new leadership at the helm as I walk down the brow and help cast off the lines. 4 A RISING TIDE LIFTS ALL BOATS THE VALUE OF MEMBERSHIP The strength of our consortium lies in the strength of our members: what they each do on their own to advance ocean science and what we can do when we come together. Our membership is unique in that academia, industry, and the larger nonprofit sector (to include aquariums, associations, and philanthropy) all have a seat at the table. Together, we take action on our common priorities and, where opinions differ, find compromises on areas of critical importance to the ocean science community and the world at large. The support, engagement, and leadership of our members is crucial to the success of COL’s programmatic work and advocacy efforts. ADVOCACY IN ACTION With input and guidance from our member-led Public Policy Committee as well as our larger membership, COL’s advocacy efforts in 2020 focused on securing reauthorizations for key federal programs, growing ocean science funding, and helping Congress and our members navigate the impacts of COVID-19 on the science and technology “oceanscape.” Since 2017, COL has led the community in pushing for a congressional reauthorization of the National Oceanographic Partnership Program (NOPP) that would catalyze ocean innovation and transformative partnerships on a national scale. By facilitating interagency and public-private partnerships among federal agencies, academia, industry, and other members of the ocean science and technology community for over 20 years, NOPP has led to successes such as the Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS), the Argo program, the JASON Project, and of course the launch of the National Ocean Sciences Bowl. The broadly shared goal of a “new NOPP” moved a step closer to being realized when a revitalized version of the program was reauthorized in the fiscal year (FY) 2021National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). We also worked with Congress and our members on important federal initiatives combatting ocean plastics, covered under the Save Ours Seas 2.0 Act, as well as those strengthening the U.S. ocean observing enterprise, through bills including the Coordinated Ocean Observations and Research Act and Digital Coast Act; all of these were successfully signed into law by the end of the 116th Congress. 5 Each fiscal year, COL weighs in on the federal appropriations process to ensure that Congress understands the funding needs and priorities of the ocean science community. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic last year, in addition to our regular requests, it was critical for COL to share how ocean science — from graduate student funding to next generation blue technology and infrastructure — fits into the larger picture of COVID relief and recovery plans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Frisco Quadrangle, Summit County, Colorado
    Geologic Map of the Frisco Quadrangle, Summit County, Colorado By Karl S. Kellogg, Paul J. Bartos, and Cindy L. Williams Pamphlet to accompany MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MAP MF-2340 2002 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Map of the Frisco Quadrangle, Summit County, Colorado By Karl S. Kellogg, Paul J. Bartos, and Cindy L. Williams DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS af Artificial fill (recent)—Compacted and uncompacted rock fragments and finer material underlying roadbed and embankments along and adjacent to Interstate 70. Also includes material comprising Dillon Dam dt Dredge tailings (recent)—Unconsolidated, clast-supported deposits containing mostly well- rounded to subrounded, cobble- to boulder-size clasts derived from dredging of alluvium for gold along the Blue and Swan Rivers; similar dredge tailings along Gold Run Gulch are too small to show on map. Dredge tailings were mapped from 1974 air photos; most tailings have now been redistributed and leveled for commercial development Qal Alluvium (Holocene)—Unconsolidated clast-supported deposits containing silt- to boulder-size, moderately sorted to well-sorted clasts in modern floodplains; includes overbank deposits. Clasts are as long as 1 m in Blue River channel; clasts are larger in some side-stream channels. Larger clasts are moderately rounded to well rounded. Includes some wetland deposits in and adjacent to beaver ponds along Ryan Gulch. Maximum thickness unknown, but greater than 10 m in Blue River channel Qw Wetland deposits (Holocene)—Dark-brown to black, organic-rich sediment underlying wetland areas, commonly containing standing water and dense willow stands. Maximum thickness estimated to be about 15 m Qav Avalanche deposits (Holocene)—Unsorted, unstratified hummocky deposits at the distal ends of avalanche-prone hillside in Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Deccan Duricrusts of India and Their Significance for the 'Laterite
    The High Deccan duricrusts of India and their significance for the ‘laterite’ issue Cliff D Ollier1 and Hetu C Sheth2,∗ 1School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, W.A. 6009, Australia. 2Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India. ∗e-mail: [email protected] In the Deccan region of western India ferricrete duricrusts, usually described as laterites, cap some basalt summits east of the Western Ghats escarpment, basalts of the low-lying Konkan Plain to its west, as well as some sizeable isolated basalt plateaus rising from the Plain. The duricrusts are iron-cemented saprolite with vermiform hollows, but apart from that have little in common with the common descriptions of laterite. The classical laterite profile is not present. In particular there are no pisolitic concretions, no or minimal development of con- cretionary crust, and the pallid zone, commonly assumed to be typical of laterites, is absent. A relatively thin, non-indurated saprolite usually lies between the duricrust and fresh basalt. The duricrust resembles the classical laterite of Angadippuram in Kerala (southwestern India), but is much harder. The High Deccan duricrusts capping the basalt summits in the Western Ghats have been interpreted as residuals from a continuous (but now largely destroyed) laterite blan- ket that represents in situ transformation of the uppermost lavas, and thereby as marking the original top of the lava pile. But the unusual pattern of the duricrusts on the map and other evidence suggest instead that the duricrusts formed along a palaeoriver system, and are now in inverted relief.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Glaciology of Edgegya and Barentsgya, Svalbard
    On the glaciology of Edgegya and Barentsgya, Svalbard JULIAN A. DOWDESWELL and JONATHAN L. BAMBER Dowdeswell J. A. & Bamber. J. L. 1995: On the glaciology of Edgeoya and Barentsoya, Svalbard. Polar Research 14(2). 105-122. The ice masses on Edgeoya and Barentsdya are the least well known in Svalbard. The islands are 42-47% ice covered with the largest ice cap, Edge0yjokulen. 1365 km2 in area. The tidewater ice cliffs of eastern Edgedya are over 80 km long and produce small tabular icebergs. Several of the ice-cap outlet glaciers on Edgeoya and Barentsoya are known to surge, and different drainage basins within the ice caps behave as dynamically separate units. Terminus advances during surging have punctuated more general retreat from Little Ice Age moraines, probably linked to Twentieth Century climate warming and mass balance change. Airborne radio-echo sounding at 60 MHz along 340 km of flight track over the ice masses of Edgeoya and Barentsldya has provided ice thickness and elevation data. Ice is grounded below sea level to about 20 km inland from the tidewater terminus of Stonebreen. Ice thickens from <lo0 rn close to the margins, to about 250 m in the interior of Edgeeiyj~kulen.The maximum ice thickness measured on Barentsjokulen was 270111. Landsat MSS images of the two islands, calibrated to in-band reflectance values, allow synoptic examination of snowline position in late July/early August. Snow and bare glacier ice were identified. and images were digitally stretched and enhanced. The snowline was at about 300111 on the east side of Edgeoyjbkulen, and 50-100 m higher to the west.
    [Show full text]
  • From Decades to Epochs: Spanning the Gap Between Geodesy and Structural Geology of Active Mountain Belts
    Journal of Structural Geology 31 (2009) 1409–1422 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Structural Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsg From decades to epochs: Spanning the gap between geodesy and structural geology of active mountain belts Richard W. Allmendinger a,*, John P. Loveless b, Matthew E. Pritchard a, Brendan Meade b a Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1504, United States b Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States article info abstract Article history: Geodetic data from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and from satellite interferometric Received 25 March 2009 radar (InSAR) are revolutionizing how we look at instantaneous tectonic deformation, but the signifi- Received in revised form cance for long-term finite strain in orogenic belts is less clear. We review two different ways of analyzing 31 July 2009 geodetic data: velocity gradient fields from which one can extract strain, dilatation, and rotation rate, and Accepted 9 August 2009 elastic block modeling, which assumes that deformation is not continuous but occurs primarily on Available online 14 August 2009 networks of interconnected faults separating quasi-rigid blocks. These methods are complementary: velocity gradients are purely kinematic and yield information about regional deformation; the calcula- Keywords: Geodesy tion does not take into account either faults or rigid blocks but, where GNSS data are dense enough, GPS active fault zones and stable blocks emerge naturally in the solution. Block modeling integrates known Active tectonics structural geometry with idealized earthquake cycle models to predict slip rates on active faults. Future technological advances should overcome many of today’s uncertainties and provide rich new data to mine by providing denser, more uniform, and temporally continuous observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 1: Mount Everest Lesson Plan
    Lesson 1: Mount Everest Lesson Plan Use the Mount Everest PowerPoint presentation in conjunction with this lesson. The PowerPoint presentation contains photographs and images and follows the sequence of the lesson. If required, this lesson can be taught in two stages; the first covering the geography of Mount Everest and the second covering the successful 1953 ascent of Everest by Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay. Key questions Where is Mount Everest located? How high is Mount Everest? What is the landscape like? How do the features of the landscape change at higher altitude? What is the weather like? How does this change? What are conditions like for people climbing the mountain? Who were Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay? How did they reach the summit of Mount Everest? What did they experience during their ascent? What did they do when they reached the summit? Subject content areas Locational knowledge: Pupils develop contextual knowledge of the location of globally significant places. Place knowledge: Communicate geographical information in a variety of ways, including writing at length. Interpret a range of geographical information. Physical geography: Describe and understand key aspects of physical geography, including mountains. Human geography: Describe and understand key aspects of human geography, including land use. Geographical skills and fieldwork: Use atlases, globes and digital/computer mapping to locate countries and describe features studied. Downloads Everest (PPT) Mount Everest factsheet for teachers
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology Specialist Report
    Motorized Travel Plan Hydrology Specialist Report Hydrology Specialist Report Motorized Travel Plan Dixie National Forest Reeds Valley, Cedar City Ranger District Prepared by Bill Goodman, East Zone Hydrologist and Chris Butler, West Zone Hydrologist May 2008 Updated March 2009 1 March 2009 Motorized Travel Plan Hydrology Specialist Report Table of Contents 3.0 Affected Environment.............................................................................................................2 3.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................2 4.0 Environmental Consequences ...............................................................................................9 4.1 Direct and Indirect Effects..................................................................................................9 4.2 Cumulative Effects ...........................................................................................................17 5.0 Project Design Criteria Common to All Action Alternatives..................................................22 6.0 Compliance with Other Laws and Regulations ....................................................................23 6.1 Clean Water Act...............................................................................................................23 6.2 Executive Order 11988 (Protection of Floodplains) of May 24, 1977...............................23 6.3 Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) of May 24, 1977..................................23
    [Show full text]
  • E-Book on Dynamic Geology of the Northern Cordillera (Alaska and Western Canada) and Adjacent Marine Areas: Tectonics, Hazards, and Resources
    Dynamic Geology of the Northern Cordillera (Alaska and Western Canada) and Adjacent Marine Areas: Tectonics, Hazards, and Resources Item Type Book Authors Bundtzen, Thomas K.; Nokleberg, Warren J.; Price, Raymond A.; Scholl, David W.; Stone, David B. Download date 03/10/2021 23:23:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7994 University of Alaska, U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Rim Geological Consulting, Queens University REGIONAL EARTH SCIENCE FOR THE LAYPERSON THROUGH PROFESSIONAL LEVELS E-Book on Dynamic Geology of the Northern Cordillera (Alaska and Western Canada) and Adjacent Marine Areas: Tectonics, Hazards, and Resources The E-Book describes, explains, and illustrates the have been subducted and have disappeared under the nature, origin, and geological evolution of the amazing Northern Cordillera. mountain system that extends through the Northern In alphabetical order, the marine areas adjacent to the Cordillera (Alaska and Western Canada), and the Northern Cordillera are the Arctic Ocean, Beaufort Sea, intriguing geology of adjacent marine areas. Other Bering Sea, Chukchi Sea, Gulf of Alaska, and the Pacific objectives are to describe geological hazards (i.e., Ocean. volcanic and seismic hazards) and geological resources (i.e., mineral and fossil fuel resources), and to describe the scientific, economic, and social significance of the earth for this region. As an example, the figure on the last page illustrates earthquakes belts for this dangerous part of the globe. What is the Northern Cordillera? The Northern Cordillera is comprised of Alaska and Western Canada. Alaska contains a series of parallel mountain ranges, and intervening topographic basins and plateaus. From north to south, the major mountain ranges are the Brooks Range, Kuskokwim Mountains, Aleutian Range, Alaska Range, Wrangell Mountains, and the Chugach Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Phosphorus Transport in the Blue River Watershed, Summit County, Colorado
    Modeling Phosphorus Transport in the Blue River Watershed, Summit County, Colorado Paula Jo Lemonds and John E. McCray Abstract Introduction Lake Dillon in Summit County, Colorado, is a primary Numerical models are useful tools because they allow a drinking-water reservoir for Denver. Eutrophication of quantitative assessment of the environmental impacts Lake Dillon is a concern, primarily due to phosphorus of wastewater pollutants and improve understanding of (P) loading. There is little agriculture in the watershed. watershed-scale pollutant transport. Projecting future Thus, many local officials attribute the P loading to water quantity and quality is especially important in onsite wastewater systems (OWS). A watershed developing communities that rely on shallow modeling effort using the SWAT model is underway to groundwater as a source of drinking water while understand the potential influence of various point and disposing of wastewater in the shallow subsurface. nonpoint sources of P in the Blue River watershed (the Some models capable of simulating watershed-scale most developed of three watersheds that supply Lake pollutant transport include Soil and Water Assessment Dillon). The watershed model was calibrated to Tool (SWAT) (Arnold 1998), MIKESHE (Danish measured flow rates and P concentrations. The Hydraulic Institute 1999), Watershed Analysis Risk hydrologic model results are most sensitive to the Management Framework (WARMF) (Chen et al. 1999) physical parameters of snowmelt, and orographic and Hydrologic Simulation Program – Fortran (HSPF) effects on precipitation and evapotranspiration. (Bicknell et al. 1996). SWAT was used for this effort However, uncertainties in chemical-hydrologic because it is a public-domain model that can parameters preclude a rigorous assignment of relative incorporate large amounts of data and simulate many contributions of various P sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Topography
    GEOGRAPHER'S SPACE by Richard Campanella TOP OF THE HILL Louisiana is the third lowest, third flattest state –and, topographically, among the most fascinating nless you live in the piney hills of northern Louisiana or the bowl is the Eastover neighborhood in eastern New Orleans, of which loess bluffs of West Feliciana Parish, the word “rugged” probably roughly half is 10 to 14 feet below sea level. Parts of Lakeview and Uarises rarely in your Louisiana lexicon. Likewise, it’s safe to say Gentilly are not much higher, at -6 to -8 feet, while certain canal beds that whoever coined the slogan “Sportsman’s Paradise” — in circulation throughout the metropolis are (when dry) 18 to 20 feet below sea since the 1860s and stenciled on state license plates since the late 1950s level. — was not referring to hiking or mountain climbing. Two hundred miles to the northwest, in rural Bienville Parish, lay Yet despite its subtlety, topographic elevation has been extraordinarily the quartz sands of the Cockfield Formation, a series of pine-covered consequential in Louisiana’s human geography because of its effects on hills peaking at Louisiana’s summit, 535-foot-high Mount Driskill. That soil fertility and habitability. More simply put, anything weak in supply high point measures one-tenth of a vertical mile above the state’s but strong in demand has great value. Our state is, after all, largely lowest point in eastern New Orleans. In contrast, elevational range of alluvial and deltaic in its physical geography, a product of sediment- California, whose apex (14,505-foot-high Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining the Science Impact of Summit Station, Greenland a White Paper Produced from the Summit Station Science Summit
    Sustaining the Science Impact of Summit Station, Greenland A white paper produced from the Summit Station Science Summit. Summit Station Science Summit conveners and lead authors: Lora Koenig, National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado Bruce Vaughn, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Acknowledgement of Funding: The lead authors would like to thank the National Science Foundation Arctic Science Section for funding this workshop and report through NSF award #PLR 1738123. Authors and Contact Information: Author Name Institution Address Email Lora Koenig NSIDC/University of Colorado National Snow and Ice Data [email protected] Center du University of Colorado UCB 449, 1540 30th Street Boulder CO 80303 Bruce Vaughn INSTAAR/University of Institute of Arctic and Alpine bruce.vaughn@colorad Colorado Research, University of o.edu Colorado UCB 450, 4001 Discovery Drive Boulder, CO 80303 John F. Burkhart University of Oslo Department of Geosciences, [email protected]. Sem Saelands vei 1, Oslo, no Norway 0371 Zoe Courville Thayer School of Engineering, Thayer School of [email protected] Dartmouth College and Cold Engineering, Dartmouth rmy.mil Regions Research and 14 Engineering Drive Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) Hanover, NH 03755 Jack Dibb Institute for the Study of Institute for the Study of [email protected] Earth, Oceans, and Space, Earth, Oceans, and Space University of New Hampshire Morse Hall University of New Hampshire 8 College Road Durham, NH 03824-3525 Robert Hawley Dartmouth College, Department Department of Earth robert.hawley@dartmo of Earth Sciences, Sciences, Dartmouth uth.edu College, 6105 Fairchild Hall Hanover, NH 03755 Richard B.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Loss of Mt. Kenya's Glaciers
    geosciences Article Mapping the Loss of Mt. Kenya’s Glaciers: An Example of the Challenges of Satellite Monitoring of Very Small Glaciers Rainer Prinz 1,* ID , Armin Heller 2, Martin Ladner 2,3 ID , Lindsey I. Nicholson 4 and Georg Kaser 4 1 Department of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, Heinrichstrasse 36, 8010 Graz, Austria 2 Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (M.L.) 3 Austrian Alpine Club, Olympiastrasse 37, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria 4 Institute of Atmospheric and Cryospheric Sciences, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria; [email protected] (L.I.N.); [email protected] (G.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +43-316-380-8296 Received: 31 March 2018; Accepted: 5 May 2018; Published: 11 May 2018 Abstract: Since the last complete glacier mapping of Mt. Kenya in 2004, strong glacier retreat and glacier disintegration have been reported. Here, we compile and present a new glacier inventory of Mt. Kenya to document recent glacier change. Glacier area and mass changes were derived from an orthophoto and digital elevation model extracted from Pléiades tri-stereo satellite images. We additionally explore the feasibility of using freely available imagery (Sentinel-2) and an alternative elevation model (TanDEM-X-DEM) for monitoring very small glaciers in complex terrain, but both proved to be inappropriate; Sentinel-2 because of its too coarse horizontal resolution compared to the very small glaciers, and TanDEM-X-DEM because of errors in the steep summit area of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Planet, Our Health, Our Future
    DISCUSSION PAPER Our Planet, Our Health, Our Future Human health and the Rio Conventions: biological diversity, climate change and desertification Our Planet, Our Health, Our Future Our Planet, Our Health, Our Future Human health and the Rio Conventions: biological diversity, climate change and desertification Coordinating lead authors: Jonathan Patz1, Carlos Corvalan2, Pierre Horwitz3, Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum4 Lead authors: Nick Watts5, Marina Maiero4, Sarah Olson1,6, Jennifer Hales7, Clark Miller8, Kathryn Campbell9, Cristina Romanelli9, David Cooper9 Reviewers: Daniele Violetti10, Fernando Castellanos Silveira10, Dan Bondi Ogolla10, Grant Kirkman10, Tiffany Hodgson10, Sergio Zelaya-Bonilla11, Elena Villalobos-Prats4 1 University of Wisconsin, USA; 2 Pan-American Health Organization and World Health Organization; 3 Edith Cowan University, Australia; 4 World Health Organization; 5 The University of Western Australia, Australia; 6 Wildlife Conservation Society; 7 Independent Consultant, Reston, VA, USA; 8 Arizona State University, USA; 9 Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 10 Secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 11 Secretariat of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. © World Health Organization 2012 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html).
    [Show full text]