DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Ncta Intx May 16Th & 17Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Center for Law, 2016 NCTA INTX Technology, and Entrepreneurship ACADEMIC WORKSHOP at the University Silicon of Colorado MAY 16TH & 17TH latirons WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS Workshop Locations Yochai Benkler, Professor of Law, Harvard University Babette E. Boliek, Associate Professor, Pepperdine University School of Law Monday, May 16, 2016 Adam Candeub, Professor, Michigan State University College of Law Samberg Conference Center - MIT David Clark, Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 6th Floor, Dining Room 5 & 6 Stacey Dogan, Professor, Boston University School of Law MIT Chang Building (E52) Carolyn Gideon, Assistant Professor of International Communication and Technology 50 Memorial Drive Policy and Director of Hitachi Center for Technology and International Affairs, The Cambridge, MA 02139 Fletcher School, Tufts University Ray Gifford, Senior Fellow, Silicon Flatirons, University of Colorado Shane Greenstein, Professor, Harvard Business School Tuesday, May 17, 2016 Christiaan Hogendorn, Associate Professor of Economics, Wesleyan University Boston Convention and John B. Horrigan, Senior Researcher, Pew Research Center Expo Center Gus Hurwitz, Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska College of Law 415 Summer Street Roslyn Layton, PhD Fellow, Aalborg University Boston, MA 02210 William Lehr, Research Scientist/CSAIL, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Directions & Parking Daniel Lyons, Associate Professor, Boston College Law School Information John Mayo, Professor of Economics, Business and Public Policy, Georgetown University Gabor Molnar, Senior Fellow, Silicon Flatirons, University of Colorado David Reed, Senior Fellow, Silicon Flatirons, University of Colorado Hotel Taylor Reynolds, Technology Policy Director, MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab William Rogerson, Charles E. and Emma H. Morrison Professor of Market Economics, Hyatt Regency Cambridge Northwestern University 575 Memorial Drive Marc Rysman, Professor of Economics, Boston University Cambridge, MA 02139 Andy Sellars, Director, BU/MIT Technology & Cyberlaw Clinic Phone: 617-492-1234 Olivier Sylvain, Associate Professor, Fordham Law School Nicol Turner-Lee, Vice President and Chief Research & Policy Officer, Multicultural Media, Telecom and Internet Council (MMTC) Scott Wallsten, Vice President for Research and Senior Fellow, Tech Policy Institute Helpful Contacts Phil Weiser, Executive Director, Silicon Flatirons; Dean,University of Colorado Law School Kevin Werbach, Associate Professor of Legal Studies and Business Ethics, Silicon Flatirons Contact The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Anna Noschese Christopher S. Yoo, John H. Chestnut Professor of Law, Communication, and [email protected] Computer & Information Science, University of Pennsylvania 303-735-5633 Ali Yurukoglu, Associate Professor, Stanford Graduate School of Business MIT CSAIL Contact INDUSTRY GUESTS Susan Perez James Assey, Executive Vice President, NCTA Rudy Brioché, VP, Global Public Policy & Policy Counsel, Comcast Cable [email protected] Elizabeth Chernow, Comcast Cable 617-253-6002 Rick Cimerman, VP External & State Affairs, NCTA Noopur Davis, SVP Security and Privacy, Comcast Technology and Product Marva Johnson, Corp. VP, Government & Industry Affairs, Bright House Networks Roy Lathrop, Senior Director of State Government Affairs, NCTA Jason Livingood, Vice President - Internet Services, Comcast Cable Diana Oo, Senior Director of Global Public Policy, Comcast Cable Galen Pospisil, NCTA Madura Wijewardena, Executive Director, Comcast Cable Monday, May 16, 2016 A Center for Law, Technology, and Samberg Conference Center - MIT Entrepreneurship at the University 6th Floor, Dining Room 5 & 6 Silicon of Colorado MIT Chang Building (E52) latirons 50 Memorial Drive Cambridge, MA 02139 Breakfast 8:30 - 9:00am Break 2:30 - 2:45pm Room 5 Room 6 Welcome 9:00 - 9:15am Competition Policy 2:45 - 3:45pm William Lehr and Phil Weiser Moderator: Ray Gifford Presenters: Emerging Issues 9:15 - 10:15am • John Mayo, The Evolution of ‘Competition’: Lessons Moderator: Gabor Molnar for 21st Century Telecommunications Policy Presenters: • Christopher S. Yoo, Empirical Analysis of the • Shane Greenstein, The Empirical Economics of Online Broadband Coverage in Europe: Infrastructure Attention Sharing vs. Facilities - Based Competition (Abstract) • Marc Rysman, Empirics of Business Data Services Discussant: Babette E. Boliek Discussant: Stacey Dogan The Evolving MVPD Universe 3:45 - 4:45pm Break 10:15 - 10:30am Moderator: William Lehr Room 6 Presenters: • David Reed, Trends in Cable Network Economics: Distributional Consequences Implications for Public Policy and Impacts of Broadband Policy 10:30 - 12:00pm • Ali Yurukoglu, Size Effects and Bargaining Power in Moderator: Scott Wallsten the Multichannel Television Industry Presenters: Discussant: William Rogerson • John B. Horrigan, Smartphones and Home Broadband Subscriptions: Substitutes, Complements, or Happy Hour Reception 5:00 - 6:00pm Something Else? Room 6 • Olivier Sylvain, Network Equality • Nicol Turner-Lee, Zero Ratings and the Public Dinner and Roundtable Discussion Interest (paper forthcoming) on Cybersecurity, Trust, and the • Daniel Lyons, Lifeline Needs Revolutionary, Not Evolving Internet 6:00 - 8:00pm Evolutionary, Change Room 5 Discussant: Yochai Benkler Moderator: Phil Weiser Presenters: Lunch 12:00 - 1:15pm • David Clark Room 6 • Noopur Davis • Jason Livingood Privacy and Security 1:15 - 2:30pm Moderator: Kevin Werbach Presenters: • Adam Candeub, Common Carriage Privacy Redux • Gus Hurwitz, Cyberensuring Security • Carolyn Gideon and Christiaan Hogendorn, Broadband Industry Structure and Cybercrime: An Empirical Analysis Discussant: Taylor Reynolds NCTA INTX THE INTERNET & TELEVISION EXPO TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016 Boston Convention and Exhibition Center 415 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210 MIT Shuttle to NCTA INTX The Internet & Television Expo 8:00am Gather in hotel lobby, depart Hyatt Regency Cambridge to Boston Convention Center Local professors should plan to meet the group at luggage check. Please plan to arrive to the General Session Room no later than 9:00AM, we anticipate this TED Session to be packed. Disruption: A TED Session Presented by INTX 9:30 - 10:30am General Session Stage, Hall C Hosts: Bryn Freedman, Editorial Director & Curator, TED Institute Kelly Stoetzel, Content Director, TED Speakers: Negin Farsad, Social Justice Comedian & Filmmaker, TED Adam Foss, Juvenile Justice Reformer, TED Jesse Genet, Entrepreneur, TED David Sengeh, Biomechatronics Engineer, TED The Communicators: The FCC Commissioners on Competition, Convergence and Consumers 11:00 - 12:00pm Super Session Stage, General Session West Hosts: Lydia Beyoud, Telecommunications Reporter, Bloomberg BNA Peter Slen, Senior Executive Producer, C-SPAN Speakers: Mignon Clyburn, Commissioner, Federal Communications Commission Michael O’Rielly, Commissioner, Federal Communications Commission Ajit Pai, Commissioner, Federal Communications Commission Jessica Rosenworcel, Commissioner, Federal Communications Commission Lunch 12:15 - 1:00pm The GROVE - located lower left of the LAWN – there will be signage and staff directing INTX Marketplace Highlights/Tour 1:00 - 2:30pm Exhibit Floor Optional Free Time: 2:30 - 5:30pm To explore Exhibit Floor or attend Tuesday’s Educational Sessions Optional Event: NCTA Chairman’s Reception 6:00 - 7:30pm Ballroom, Level 3 - City Overlook Full Schedule for Tuesday’s Sessions The Empirical Economics of Online Attention Andre Boik, Shane Greenstein, and Jeffrey Prince April 2016 Preliminary. Not for quotation without Permission. Abstract We model and measure how households allocate online attention, and assess if and how online attention changed between 2008 and 2013, a time of large increases in online offerings, e.g., video and access points. We calculate our measures using click-stream data for thousands of U.S. households. We find that general measures of breadth and depth of online attention are remarkably stable over this period, while shares of domain categories markedly change – with video and social media expanding, and chat and news contracting. We illustrate how this finding is difficult to reconcile with standard models of optimal time allocation, and suggest alternatives that may be more suitable. The fact that increasingly valuable offerings change where households go online, but not their general (i.e., breadth/depth) online attention patterns, has important implications for competition and welfare. University of California, Davis, Department of Economics; Harvard Business School, Department of Technology and Operations Management; and Indiana University, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy, Kelley School of Business. We thank Kelley School of Business and the Harvard Business School for funding. We thank seminar audiences at Georgetown, Harvard and Northwestern, and conference participants at the American Economic Association Annual Meetings and the International Industrial Organization Conference for comments and suggestions. Philip Marx for excellent research assistance. We are responsible for all errors. 1 1. Introduction “…in an information-rich world, the wealth of information means a dearth of something else: a scarcity of whatever it is that information consumes. What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention and a need to allocate that attention efficiently
Recommended publications
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Unlicensed Use of the 6 GHz Band ) ET Docket No. 18-295 ) Expanding Flexible Use in Mid-Band ) GN Docket No. 17-183 Spectrum Between 3.7 and 24 GHz ) OPPOSITION OF NCTA – THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION TO PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION Rick Chessen Neal Goldberg Danielle J. Piñeres NCTA – The Internet & Television Association 25 Massachusetts Avenue, NW – Suite 100 Washington, DC 20001-1431 (202) 222-2445 July 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 2 I. THE COMMISSION BASED ITS DECISION TO PERMIT UNLICENSED USE IN THE 6 GHZ BAND ON THOROUGH CONSIDERATION OF THE RECORD AND SOUND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND ACCORDINGLY ADOPTED APPROPRIATE PROTECTION MEASURES ........................................ 4 A. The Commission Should Reject FWCC’s Claims that It Failed to Take Sufficient Action to Protect Incumbents Against Harmful Interference ..................... 5 B. FWCC Proposes Burdensome Measures to Address Its Harmful Interference Concerns that the Commission Already Considered and Properly Rejected and that Are neither Necessary nor in the Public Interest ................................................. 10 i. The Commission Correctly Decided Not to Codify an Unnecessary Activity Limit for LPI Devices ........................................................................... 11 ii. The Commission Considered and Declined to Mandate Testing Before
  • Assessing the Economic Potential of 10G NETWORKS

    Assessing the Economic Potential of 10G NETWORKS

    TELECOM ADVISORY SERVICES Assessing the Economic Potential of 10G NETWORKS OCTOBER 2020 AUTHORS RAUL KATZ (Ph.D., Management Science and Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) is currently Director of Business Strategy Research at the Columbia Institute for Tele-Information, and President of Telecom Advisory Services, LLC (URL: www.teleadvs.com). Before founding Telecom Advisory Services, he worked for twenty years at Booz Allen Hamilton, where he was the Head of the Telecommunications Practice in North and Latin America and member of its Leadership Team. MR. FERNANDO CALLORDA (BA, MA, Economics, Universidad de San Andres-Argentina) is a Project Manager at Telecom Advisory Services, LLC and Research Fellow in the National Network of Public Universities in Argentina. He is also a professor of Political Economy at UNLAM and has taught courses of finance in regulated industries. Telecom Advisory Services LLC (TAS) is an international consulting firm specialized in the development of business strategies and public policies for digital and telecommunications companies, governments, and international organizations. Its clients include leading companies in the digital and telecommunications sectors, as well as international organizations such as the International Telecommunications Union, the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the World Economic Forum, the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, the GSMA Association, the CTIA, the NCTA, GigaEurope, the Wi-Fi Alliance, and the FTTH Council (Europe).
  • Declaratory Ruling

    Declaratory Ruling

    Federal Communications Commission DA 21-78 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by ) WC Docket No. 17-84 Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment ) DECLARATORY RULING Adopted: January 19, 2020 Released: January 19, 2021 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau I. INTRODUCTION 1. Closing the digital divide and delivering the benefits of broadband to all Americans remains the Commission’s top priority. The COVID-19 pandemic has served to highlight the essential nature of a robust communications infrastructure in promoting access to healthcare, employment, education opportunities, and social connectivity, including civic and religious institutions, as well as family and friends. As part of its efforts to close the digital divide and further broadband deployment, the Commission has undertaken a series of reforms of its pole attachment rules with the aim of making access to this critical infrastructure faster, easier, safer, more predictable, and more affordable.1 Most notably, in August 2018, the Commission adopted the 2018 Wireline Infrastructure Order, which eliminated barriers to broadband deployment by streamlining the process for attaching new communications facilities to utility poles and reducing associated costs.2 2. In July 2020, NCTA — The Internet & Television Association filed a Petition for Expedited Declaratory Ruling (NCTA Petition) seeking clarification of certain issues related to pole replacements.3 In particular, NCTA requested that the Commission clarify that in unserved areas, it is unjust and unreasonable for pole owners to shift all pole replacement costs to new attachers.4 We decline to act on NCTA’s Petition at this time.
  • Visions of Electric Media Electric of Visions

    Visions of Electric Media Electric of Visions

    TELEVISUAL CULTURE Roberts Visions of Electric Media Ivy Roberts Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Visions of Electric Media Televisual Culture Televisual culture encompasses and crosses all aspects of television – past, current and future – from its experiential dimensions to its aesthetic strategies, from its technological developments to its crossmedial extensions. The ‘televisual’ names a condition of transformation that is altering the coordinates through which we understand, theorize, intervene, and challenge contemporary media culture. Shifts in production practices, consumption circuits, technologies of distribution and access, and the aesthetic qualities of televisual texts foreground the dynamic place of television in the contemporary media landscape. They demand that we revisit concepts such as liveness, media event, audiences and broadcasting, but also that we theorize new concepts to meet the rapidly changing conditions of the televisual. The series aims at seriously analyzing both the contemporary specificity of the televisual and the challenges uncovered by new developments in technology and theory in an age in which digitization and convergence are redrawing the boundaries of media. Series editors Sudeep Dasgupta, Joke Hermes, Misha Kavka, Jaap Kooijman, Markus Stauff Visions of Electric Media Television in the Victorian and Machine Ages Ivy Roberts Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: ‘Professor Goaheadison’s Latest,’ Fun, 3 July 1889, 6. Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden
  • INTERNET ACCESS VIA CABLE TV: HIGH SPEED ACCESS to the INFORMATION HIGHWAY Lynn Jones Digital Equipment Corporation

    INTERNET ACCESS VIA CABLE TV: HIGH SPEED ACCESS to the INFORMATION HIGHWAY Lynn Jones Digital Equipment Corporation

    INTERNET ACCESS VIA CABLE TV: HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO THE INFORMATION HIGHWAY Lynn Jones Digital Equipment Corporation Abstract countries around the world. In early 1994, it was estimated that on the average, a new Internet access has become a feeding frenzy. computer was added to the Internet every 30 Dial-up access to the World Wide Web just seconds.ii The growth of the Internet contin­ isn't fast enough. Your subscribers know ues to be exponential. that cable TV can give them access to hyper­ text at the speed of a bullet train, and they The cable TV industry has the capability want it. Now what do you do? to provide subscribers with Internet access at speeds unmatched in price/performance by How do you separate the hype from the hy­ any other medium. Using the ubiquitous, ex­ pertext? For that matter, what is hypertext? isting Hybrid Fiber Coax (HFC) infrastructure This paper will answer these questions and in place in the US, Canada, and many coun­ more, providing a framework within which tries around the world today, the cable indus­ to plan and implement Internet access on try can give customers high speed access at a your system. It will give you a crash course much lower cost - a key criteria for Internet on the Internet and show how the informa­ users. tion highway is being created today with the Internet and cable TV. Rapid access to and provision of pic­ tures, sound, video, audio, and integrated text and graphics are all made possible by access­ INTRODUCTION ing Internet sites on the World Wide Web, using a Web browser program from a personal "Internet over cable TV will receive more computer connected to the Internet via cable general press (Information Superhighway) television.
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of Use of the 5.850-5.925 Ghz Band ET Docket

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of Use of the 5.850-5.925 Ghz Band ET Docket

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ET Docket No. 19-138 Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band COMMENTS OF NCTA – THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION Rick Chessen Paul Margie Neal Goldberg Jason Neal Danielle Piñeres HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP NCTA – THE INTERNET & 1919 M Street NW TELEVISION ASSOCIATION 8th Floor 25 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 Suite 100 (202) 730-1300 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 222-2445 Counsel for NCTA June 2, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 II. THE COMMISSION CORRECTLY DETERMINED THAT OPENING THE 5.9 GHZ BAND TO UNLICENSED TECHNOLOGIES WILL IMPROVE CONSUMER BROADBAND. ............................ 2 A. The First Report and Order Found that 5.9 GHz Unlicensed Spectrum Will Facilitate Access to a 160-Megahertz Channel for Next-Generation Wi-Fi, Including Through Upgrades to Existing Equipment. ............................................ 2 B. Consumer Demand for Additional Wi-Fi Spectrum Continues to Grow as the Nation Responds to the Public Health Crisis. ......................................................... 4 III. THE COMMISSION SHOULD ADOPT RULES THAT PERMIT ROBUST OUTDOOR INVESTMENT AND DEPLOYMENT. ........................................................................................ 5 A. The Commission Should Adopt NTIA’s Proposed Exclusion Zones for 36 dBm EIRP Outdoor Unlicensed Operations. ....................................................
  • The Future of Cable Television Audio Is Accessible

    The Future of Cable Television Audio Is Accessible

    The Future of Cable Television Audio is Accessible A Technical Paper prepared for SCTE•ISBE by Mark Francisco Fellow Comcast Cable 1800 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215)286-8959 [email protected] © 2020 SCTE•ISBE and NCTA. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Title Page Number 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. What we must do – Regulations for MVPDs and Broadcasters ......................................................... 3 3. Conventions in Cable Television Audio .............................................................................................. 4 3.1. Retransmission....................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Conventions in Streaming Media Provider Audio .................................................................. 5 3.3. Conventions in Cable Television Broadcast Programming .................................................... 5 4. Where Do We Go From Here .............................................................................................................. 7 4.1. The United Nations Already Solved This Problem ................................................................. 7 4.2. Accessibility is About More Than Just Content Signaling ...................................................... 7 4.3. The Future of Over-the-Air Broadcasting ..............................................................................
  • The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet

    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet

    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced.
  • General Information 1

    General Information 1

    General Information 1 The college also operates a 562 acre farm which serves as a field GENERAL INFORMATION laboratory. The farm includes grain storage facilities, cattle growing and finishing facilities, and a completely diversified dry land and irrigated This is a Course Catalog for the Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture farming operation. (NCTA). This catalog will serve as a reference during your time at NCTA. We hope the information contained will provide answers to your questions about Accreditation NCTA. The Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture has been granted accreditation with the Higher Learning Commission. The American Vision Veterinary Medical Association accredits the Veterinary Technology The Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture will foster a student- program. In addition, the College is approved to offer courses and majors centered learning environment with a national reputation for producing for veterans benefits and training under the War Orphans Act. graduates who are in high demand by agriculture and related industries. The Higher Learning Commission Mission 30 North LaSalle St., Suite 2400 Chicago, IL 60602-2504 The Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture is devoted to a statewide 800-621-7440 mission of preparing students for successful careers in agriculture, veterinary technology and related industries. The college provides open access to innovative technical education resulting in associate degrees, Location certificates and other credentials. The Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture is located in the community of Curtis with a population of approximately 800 people on Key Characteristics the gentle rolling plains of southwest Nebraska, in the northwest part of Frontier County. Curtis is located 8 miles east of Highway 83 between • Nationally recognized education at the associate degree level the cities of North Platte and McCook.
  • Searchable PDF Index

    Searchable PDF Index

    TELEPHONE COLLECTORS INTERNATIONAL Telephone Collectors International is an organization of telephone collectors, hobbyists and historians who are helping to preserve the history of the telecommunications industry through the collection of telephones and telephone related material. Our collections represent all aspects of the industry; from the very first wooden prototypes that started the industry to the technological marvels that made the automatic telephone exchange possible. If any of this interests you, we invite you to join our organization. Look around and see what we have to offer. Thanks for stopping by! Telephone Collectors International website including become a member: http://www.telephonecollectors.org/ Questions or comments about TCI? Send e-mail to [email protected] ********************************************************************************* Books Recommended by the editors: Available now ... Old-Time Telephones! Design, History, and Restoration by Ralph O. Meyer ... 264pp Soft Cover 2nd Edition, Expanded and Revised ... A Schiffer Book with Price Guide for Collectors Available at Phoneco.com or Schiffer Publishing, Ltd., 4880 Lower Valley Rd, Atglen, PA 19310 e-mail: [email protected] ********************************************************************************** Coming Soon: TELEPHONE Dials and Pushbuttons Their History, Development and Usage by Stanley Swihart ... 2 volumes, 300 pp ea. Box 2818, Dublin, CA., 94568-0818. Phone 1 (925)-829-2728, e-mail [email protected] *********************************************************************************
  • Cable Companies and Municipalities NATURAL SMART COMMUNITY PARTNERS TABLE of CONTENTS

    Cable Companies and Municipalities NATURAL SMART COMMUNITY PARTNERS TABLE of CONTENTS

    2020 Cable Companies and Municipalities NATURAL SMART COMMUNITY PARTNERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Executive Summary 4 Key Takeaways 5 Introduction 7 SECTION ONE “Smart Community” Overview 11 SECTION TWO What Cable Providers Bring to Smart Community Partnerships & Projects 14 SECTION THREE The Expanding Ecosystem of the Smart Community Sector 21 Conclusion & Recommendations Cover Photo by Alina Grubnyak on Unsplash Laptop Photo by Nathan Dumlao on Unsplash CABLE COMPANIES AND MUNICIPALITIES: NATURAL SMART COMMUNITY PARTNERS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In recent years, a growing ecosystem of organizations are acting as the catalysts for Smart Community projects. The Smart Community market has expanded beyond local governments to include: Hospitals Universities Utilities Real Estate Developers Like municipalities, these new actors in the Smart Community marketplace require solutions that can meet their evolving needs and value partners that can work collaboratively to deploy, leverage and support networks of connected devices. Research conducted by Connected Communities LLC supports a conclusion that cable companies are uniquely well-positioned to help a growing ecosystem of Smart Community partners advance their objectives. Cable companies possess both dense network infrastructure across large service areas and valuable experience deploying and managing wired and wireless networks designed to solve complex connectivity challenges. Smart Community projects involving cable companies, municipalities and other Smart Community partners are on-going in urban, suburban and rural areas across the county. From the lessons learned drawn from these projects, the following recommendations emerge for cable companies and the growing ecosystem of Smart Community partners: Recommendations for Organizations Pursuing Smart Community Projects: ― Do not lose sight of the fact that effective Smart Community projects require robust, reliable and secure connectivity.
  • The Myth of the Sole Inventor

    The Myth of the Sole Inventor

    Michigan Law Review Volume 110 Issue 5 2012 The Myth of the Sole Inventor Mark A. Lemley Stanford Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Mark A. Lemley, The Myth of the Sole Inventor, 110 MICH. L. REV. 709 (2012). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol110/iss5/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MYTH OF THE SOLE INVENTORt Mark A. Lemley* The theory of patent law is based on the idea that a lone genius can solve problems that stump the experts, and that the lone genius will do so only if properly incented. But the canonical story of the lone genius inventor is largely a myth. Surveys of hundreds of significant new technologies show that almost all of them are invented simultaneously or nearly simultaneous- ly by two or more teams working independently of each other. Invention appears in significant part to be a social, not an individual, phenomenon. The result is a real problem for classic theories of patent law. Our domi- nant theory of patent law doesn't seem to explain the way we actually implement that law. Maybe the problem is not with our current patent law, but with our current patent theory.