Understanding and Attributing Climate Change

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding and Attributing Climate Change 9 Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Coordinating Lead Authors: Gabriele C. Hegerl (USA, Germany), Francis W. Zwiers (Canada) Lead Authors: Pascale Braconnot (France), Nathan P. Gillett (UK), Yong Luo (China), Jose A. Marengo Orsini (Brazil, Peru), Neville Nicholls (Australia), Joyce E. Penner (USA), Peter A. Stott (UK) Contributing Authors: M. Allen (UK), C. Ammann (USA), N. Andronova (USA), R.A. Betts (UK), A. Clement (USA), W.D. Collins (USA), S. Crooks (UK), T.L. Delworth (USA), C. Forest (USA), P. Forster (UK), H. Goosse (Belgium), J.M. Gregory (UK), D. Harvey (Canada), G.S. Jones (UK), F. Joos (Switzerland), J. Kenyon (USA), J. Kettleborough (UK), V. Kharin (Canada), R. Knutti (Switzerland), F.H. Lambert (UK), M. Lavine (USA), T.C.K. Lee (Canada), D. Levinson (USA), V. Masson-Delmotte (France), T. Nozawa (Japan), B. Otto-Bliesner (USA), D. Pierce (USA), S. Power (Australia), D. Rind (USA), L. Rotstayn (Australia), B. D. Santer (USA), C. Senior (UK), D. Sexton (UK), S. Stark (UK), D.A. Stone (UK), S. Tett (UK), P. Thorne (UK), R. van Dorland (The Netherlands), M. Wang (USA), B. Wielicki (USA), T. Wong (USA), L. Xu (USA, China), X. Zhang (Canada), E. Zorita (Germany, Spain) Review Editors: David J. Karoly (USA, Australia), Laban Ogallo (Kenya), Serge Planton (France) This chapter should be cited as: Hegerl, G.C., F. W. Zwiers, P. Braconnot, N.P. Gillett, Y. Luo, J.A. Marengo Orsini, N. Nicholls, J.E. Penner and P.A. Stott, 2007: Under- standing and Attributing Climate Change. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Chapter 9 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................... 665 9.6 Observational Constraints on Climate Sensitivity ............................................. 718 9.1 Introduction ......................................................... 667 9.6.1 Methods to Estimate Climate Sensitivity ............. 718 9.1.1 What are Climate Change and 9.6.2 Estimates of Climate Sensitivity Based on Climate Variability? .............................................. 667 Instrumental Observations .................................. 719 9.1.2 What are Climate Change Detection 9.6.3 Estimates of Climate Sensitivity Based on and Attribution? ................................................... 667 Palaeoclimatic Data ............................................. 724 9.1.3 The Basis from which We Begin .......................... 669 9.6.4 Summary of Observational Constraints for Climate Sensitivity ............................................... 725 9.2 Radiative Forcing and Climate Response ............................................................... 670 9.7 Combining Evidence of Anthropogenic 9.2.1 Radiative Forcing Estimates Used to Climate Change ................................................... 727 Simulate Climate Change .................................... 671 Frequently Asked Questions 9.2.2 Spatial and Temporal Patterns of the Response to Different Forcings and their Uncertainties ....... 674 FAQ 9.1: Can Individual Extreme Events be Explained by Greenhouse Warming? ..................................... 696 9.2.3 Implications for Understanding 20th-Century Climate Change ................................................... 678 FAQ 9.2: Can the Warming of the 20th Century be Explained by Natural Variability? ......................... 702 9.2.4 Summary ............................................................. 678 References ........................................................................ 733 9.3 Understanding Pre-Industrial Climate Change ................................................... 679 Appendix 9.A: Methods Used to Detect 9.3.1 Why Consider Pre-Industrial Climate Externally Forced Signals .......................................... 744 Change? .............................................................. 679 9.3.2 What can be Learned from the Last Glacial Maximum and the Mid-Holocene? ...................... 679 Supplementary Material 9.3.3 What can be Learned from the Past 1,000 Years? ........................................................ 680 The following supplementary material is available on CD-ROM and in on-line versions of this report. 9.3.4 Summary ............................................................. 683 Appendix 9.B: Methods Used to Estimate Climate Sensitivity and Aerosol 9.4 Understanding of Air Temperature Forcing Change During the Industrial Era .............. 683 Appendix 9.C: Notes and technical details on Figures displayed in Chapter 9 9.4.1 Global-Scale Surface Temperature Change ........ 683 Appendix 9.D: Additional Figures and Tables 9.4.2 Continental and Sub-continental Surface References for Appendices 9.B to 9.D Temperature Change ........................................... 693 9.4.3 Surface Temperature Extremes ........................... 698 9.4.4 Free Atmosphere Temperature ............................ 699 9.4.5 Summary ............................................................. 704 9.5 Understanding of Change in Other Variables during the Industrial Era ............. 705 9.5.1 Ocean Climate Change ....................................... 705 9.5.2 Sea Level ............................................................. 707 9.5.3 Atmospheric Circulation Changes ....................... 709 9.5.4 Precipitation ......................................................... 712 9.5.5 Cryosphere Changes ........................................... 716 9.5.6 Summary ............................................................. 717 664 Chapter 9 Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Executive Summary century. Anthropogenic influence has been detected in every continent except Antarctica (which has insufficient observational coverage to make an assessment), and in some Evidence of the effect of external influences on the climate sub-continental land areas. The ability of coupled climate models system has continued to accumulate since the Third Assessment to simulate the temperature evolution on continental scales and Report (TAR). The evidence now available is substantially the detection of anthropogenic effects on each of six continents stronger and is based on analyses of widespread temperature provides stronger evidence of human influence on the global increases throughout the climate system and changes in other climate than was available at the time of the TAR. No climate climate variables. model that has used natural forcing only has reproduced the observed global mean warming trend or the continental mean Human-induced warming of the climate system is warming trends in all individual continents (except Antarctica) widespread. Anthropogenic warming of the climate system can over the second half of the 20th century. be detected in temperature observations taken at the surface, Difficulties remain in attributing temperature changes on in the troposphere and in the oceans. Multi-signal detection smaller than continental scales and over time scales of less than and attribution analyses, which quantify the contributions 50 years. Attribution at these scales, with limited exceptions, of different natural and anthropogenic forcings to observed has not yet been established. Averaging over smaller regions changes, show that greenhouse gas forcing alone during the reduces the natural variability less than does averaging over past half century would likely have resulted in greater than the large regions, making it more difficult to distinguish between observed warming if there had not been an offsetting cooling changes expected from different external forcings, or between effect from aerosol and other forcings. external forcing and variability. In addition, temperature changes It is extremely unlikely (<5%) that the global pattern of associated with some modes of variability are poorly simulated warming during the past half century can be explained without by models in some regions and seasons. Furthermore, the small- external forcing, and very unlikely that it is due to known scale details of external forcing, and the response simulated by natural external causes alone. The warming occurred in both the models are less credible than large-scale features. ocean and the atmosphere and took place at a time when natural external forcing factors would likely have produced cooling. Surface temperature extremes have likely been affected Greenhouse gas forcing has very likely caused most of the by anthropogenic forcing. Many indicators of climate extremes observed global warming over the last 50 years. This conclusion and variability, including the annual numbers of frost days, takes into account observational and forcing uncertainty, and warm and cold days, and warm and cold nights, show changes the possibility that the response to solar forcing could be that are consistent with warming. An anthropogenic influence underestimated by climate models. It is also robust to the use has been detected in some of these indices, and there is evidence of different climate models, different methods for estimating that anthropogenic forcing may have substantially increased the the responses to external forcing and variations in the analysis risk of extremely warm summer conditions regionally, such
Recommended publications
  • Understanding and Attributing Climate Change
    9 Understanding and Attributing Climate Change Coordinating Lead Authors: Gabriele C. Hegerl (USA, Germany), Francis W. Zwiers (Canada) Lead Authors: Pascale Braconnot (France), Nathan P. Gillett (UK), Yong Luo (China), Jose A. Marengo Orsini (Brazil, Peru), Neville Nicholls (Australia), Joyce E. Penner (USA), Peter A. Stott (UK) Contributing Authors: M. Allen (UK), C. Ammann (USA), N. Andronova (USA), R.A. Betts (UK), A. Clement (USA), W.D. Collins (USA), S. Crooks (UK), T.L. Delworth (USA), C. Forest (USA), P. Forster (UK), H. Goosse (Belgium), J.M. Gregory (UK), D. Harvey (Canada), G.S. Jones (UK), F. Joos (Switzerland), J. Kenyon (USA), J. Kettleborough (UK), V. Kharin (Canada), R. Knutti (Switzerland), F.H. Lambert (UK), M. Lavine (USA), T.C.K. Lee (Canada), D. Levinson (USA), V. Masson-Delmotte (France), T. Nozawa (Japan), B. Otto-Bliesner (USA), D. Pierce (USA), S. Power (Australia), D. Rind (USA), L. Rotstayn (Australia), B. D. Santer (USA), C. Senior (UK), D. Sexton (UK), S. Stark (UK), D.A. Stone (UK), S. Tett (UK), P. Thorne (UK), R. van Dorland (The Netherlands), M. Wang (USA), B. Wielicki (USA), T. Wong (USA), L. Xu (USA, China), X. Zhang (Canada), E. Zorita (Germany, Spain) Review Editors: David J. Karoly (USA, Australia), Laban Ogallo (Kenya), Serge Planton (France) This chapter should be cited as: Hegerl, G.C., F. W. Zwiers, P. Braconnot, N.P. Gillett, Y. Luo, J.A. Marengo Orsini, N. Nicholls, J.E. Penner and P.A. Stott, 2007: Under- standing and Attributing Climate Change. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D.
    [Show full text]
  • Shortwave Forcing and Feedbacks in Last Glacial
    Downloaded from http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on October 12, 2015 Shortwave forcing and feedbacks in Last Glacial rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Maximum and Mid-Holocene PMIP3 simulations Research Pascale Braconnot and Masa Kageyama Cite this article: Braconnot P,Kageyama M. Laboratoire des Siences du climat et de l’Environnement, 2015 Shortwave forcing and feedbacks in Last Orme des Merisiers, bât. 712, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex 91191, France Glacial Maximum and Mid-Holocene PMIP3 simulations. Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A373: Simulations of the climates of the Last Glacial 20140424. Maximum (LGM), 21 000 years ago, and of the http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0424 Mid-Holocene (MH), 6000 years ago, allow an analysis of climate feedbacks in climate states that Accepted: 29 June 2015 are radically different from today. The analyses of cloud and surface albedo feedbacks show that the shortwave cloud feedback is a major driver of One contribution of 12 to a discussion meeting differences between model results. Similar behaviours issue ‘Feedbacks on climate in the Earth appear when comparing the LGM and MH simulated system’. changes, highlighting the fingerprint of model physics. Even though the different feedbacks show Subject Areas: similarities between the different climate periods, climatology the fact that their relative strength differs from one climate to the other prevents a direct comparison of past and future climate sensitivity. The land- Keywords: surface feedback also shows large disparities among Last Glacial Maximum and Mid-Holocene models even though they all produce positive climates, ice-sheet and insolation forcing, sea-ice and snow feedbacks. Models have very cloud and surface albedo feedbacks different sensitivities when considering the vegetation feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 9: Evaluation of Climate Models
    Zero Order Draft Chapter 9 IPCC WGI Fifth Assessment Report 1 2 Chapter 9: Evaluation of Climate Models 3 4 Coordinating Lead Authors: Gregory Flato (Canada), Jochem Marotzke (Germany) 5 6 Lead Authors: Babatunde Abiodun (South Africa), Pascale Braconnot (France), Sin Chan Chou (Brazil), 7 William Collins (USA), Peter Cox (UK), Fatima Driouech (Morocco), Seita Emori (Japan), Veronika Eyring 8 (Germany), Chris Forest (USA), Peter Gleckler (USA), Eric Guilyardi (France), Christian Jakob (Australia), 9 Vladimir Kattsov (Russia), Chris Reason (South Africa), Markku Rummukainen (Sweden) 10 11 Contributing Authors: Johanna Baehr, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Bode Gbobaniyi, Stephen Griffies, 12 Elizabeth Hunke, Tatiana Ilyina, Stephen A. Klein, Reto Knutti, Felix Landerer, Florian Rauser, Mark 13 Rodwell, Adam A. Scaife, John Scinocca, Hideo Shiogama, Ken Sperber, Bjorn Stevens, Keith Williams, 14 Tim Woollings 15 16 Review Editors: Isaac Held (USA), Andy Pitman (Australia), Serge Planton (France), Zong-Ci Zhao 17 (China) 18 19 Date of Draft: 15 April 2011 20 21 Notes: TSU Compiled Version 22 23 24 Table of Contents 25 26 Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................3 27 9.1 Climate Models and their Characteristics..............................................................................................4 28 9.1.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 IPCC WGI Fifth Assessment Report
    First Order Draft Chapter 9 IPCC WGI Fifth Assessment Report 1 2 Chapter 9: Evaluation of Climate Models 3 4 Coordinating Lead Authors: Gregory Flato (Canada), Jochem Marotzke (Germany) 5 6 Lead Authors: Babatunde Abiodun (South Africa), Pascale Braconnot (France), Sin Chan Chou (Brazil), 7 William Collins (USA), Peter Cox (UK), Fatima Driouech (Morocco), Seita Emori (Japan), Veronika Eyring 8 (Germany), Chris Forest (USA), Peter Gleckler (USA), Eric Guilyardi (France), Christian Jakob (Australia), 9 Vladimir Kattsov (Russia), Chris Reason (South Africa), Markku Rummukainen (Sweden) 10 11 Contributing Authors: Alessandro Anav, Timothy Andrews, Johanna Baehr, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, 12 Ping Chang, Aiguo Dai, Clara Deser, Bode Gbobaniyi, Fidel Gonzales-Rouco, Stephen Griffies, Alex Hall, 13 Elizabeth Hunke, Tatiana Ilyina, Viatcheslav Kharin, Stephen A. Klein, Jeff Knight, Reto Knutti, Felix 14 Landerer, Tatiana Pavlova, Florian Rauser, Mark Rodwell, Adam A. Scaife, John Scinocca, Hideo 15 Shiogama, Jana Sillmann, Ken Sperber, David Stephenson, Bjorn Stevens, Mark Webb, Keith Williams, Tim 16 Woollings, Shang-Ping Xie 17 18 Review Editors: Isaac Held (USA), Andy Pitman (Australia), Serge Planton (France), Zong-Ci Zhao 19 (China) 20 21 Date of Draft: 16 December 2011 22 23 Notes: TSU Compiled Version 24 25 26 Table of Contents 27 28 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 29 9.1 Climate Models and their Characteristics ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Lunt, D. J., Abe- Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P
    Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Lunt, D. J., Abe- Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Capron, E., Carlson, A. E., Dutton, A., Fischer, H., Goelzer, H., Govin, A., Haywood, A., Joos, F., Legrande, A. N., Lipscomb, W. H., Lohmann, G., Mahowald, N., ... Zhang, Q. (2017). The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(11), 3979-4003. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Copernicus at https://www.geosci-model-dev.net/10/3979/2017/ . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3979–4003, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations Bette L.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Interglacials, Scientific Objective And
    The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations Bette Otto-Bliesner, Pascale Braconnot, Sandy Harrison, Daniel Lunt, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, Samuel Albani, Patrick Bartlein, Emilie Capron, Anders Carlson, Andrea Dutton, et al. To cite this version: Bette Otto-Bliesner, Pascale Braconnot, Sandy Harrison, Daniel Lunt, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, et al.. The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations. Geoscientific Model Development, European Geosciences Union, 2017, 10 (11), pp.3979-4003. 10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017. hal-02181006 HAL Id: hal-02181006 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02181006 Submitted on 11 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3979–4003, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 © Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and Last Interglacial simulations Bette L. Otto-Bliesner1, Pascale Braconnot2, Sandy P.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex I Glossary Editor: A.P.M
    Annex I Glossary Editor: A.P.M. Baede (Netherlands) Notes: This glossary defines some specific terms as the lead authors intend them to be interpreted in the context of this report. Red, italicised words indicate that the term is defined in the Glossary. 8.2ka event Following the last post-glacial warming, a rapid Albedo The fraction of solar radiation reflected by a surface or climate oscillation with a cooling lasting about 400 years occurred object, often expressed as a percentage. Snow-covered surfaces have about 8.2 ka. This event is also referred to as the 8.2kyr event. a high albedo, the surface albedo of soils ranges from high to low, and vegetation-covered surfaces and oceans have a low albedo. The Abrupt climate change The nonlinearity of the climate system Earth’s planetary albedo varies mainly through varying cloudiness, may lead to abrupt climate change, sometimes called rapid climate snow, ice, leaf area and land cover changes. change, abrupt events or even surprises. The term abrupt often refers to time scales faster than the typical time scale of the responsible Albedo feedback A climate feedback involving changes in the forcing. However, not all abrupt climate changes need be externally Earth’s albedo. It usually refers to changes in the cryosphere, which forced. Some possible abrupt events that have been proposed has an albedo much larger (~0.8) than the average planetary albedo include a dramatic reorganisation of the thermohaline circulation, (~0.3). In a warming climate, it is anticipated that the cryosphere rapid deglaciation and massive melting of permafrost or increases in would shrink, the Earth’s overall albedo would decrease and more soil respiration leading to fast changes in the carbon cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Comment Response 5-1 5 0 0 0 0 the Coverage of the Chapter Seems a Bit Too Limited and Selective Although I Understand the Number of Pages Taken Into Account
    Expert Review Comments on the IPCC WGI AR5 First Order Draft -- Chapter 5 Comment Chapter From From To To No Page Line Page Line Comment Response 5-1 5 0 0 0 0 The coverage of the chapter seems a bit too limited and selective although I understand the number of pages Taken into account. Covered in new section 5.5 are limited. For example, why abrupt climate change in the Holocene is not covered only those in the glacial? (Holocene regional changes) within space limitations. Some of the topics probably are dealt in earlier reports, but because of its importance for future implications coverage of the Holocene climate change should be increased. [Takuro Kobashi, Japan] 5-2 5 0 Too many references in the text will distract the attention of the readers [Muhammad Amjad, Pakistan] Noted 5-3 5 0 This chapter is generally difficult to read for non specialists. The style has to be corrected as well as the Taken into account. Sections reorganised and logics numerous typos and spelling mistakes. The content needs to be "simplified" and better organised. To my better explained. opinion, there is still some work to do on this chapter. [CATHERINE BELTRAN, France] 5-4 5 0 In general it is difficult to get the main message. It would be easier if the main results were highlighted and if Noted "what's left to do" was clearly assigned. [CATHERINE BELTRAN, France] 5-5 5 0 general comment. I found the material included in this chapter quite convincing. The overall organisation of the Noted; Revised introduction should give better chapter is fine, except that the exact place of some pieces of information should be reconsidered.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex I FINAL.Indd
    Annex I Glossary Editor: A.P.M. Baede (Netherlands) Notes: This glossary defi nes some specifi c terms as the lead authors intend them to be interpreted in the context of this report. Red, italicised words indicate that the term is defi ned in the Glossary. 8.2ka event Following the last post-glacial warming, a rapid Albedo The fraction of solar radiation refl ected by a surface or climate oscillation with a cooling lasting about 400 years occurred object, often expressed as a percentage. Snow-covered surfaces have about 8.2 ka. This event is also referred to as the 8.2kyr event. a high albedo, the surface albedo of soils ranges from high to low, and vegetation-covered surfaces and oceans have a low albedo. The Abrupt climate change The nonlinearity of the climate system Earth’s planetary albedo varies mainly through varying cloudiness, may lead to abrupt climate change, sometimes called rapid climate snow, ice, leaf area and land cover changes. change, abrupt events or even surprises. The term abrupt often refers to time scales faster than the typical time scale of the responsible Albedo feedback A climate feedback involving changes in the forcing. However, not all abrupt climate changes need be externally Earth’s albedo. It usually refers to changes in the cryosphere, which forced. Some possible abrupt events that have been proposed has an albedo much larger (~0.8) than the average planetary albedo include a dramatic reorganisation of the thermohaline circulation, (~0.3). In a warming climate, it is anticipated that the cryosphere rapid deglaciation and massive melting of permafrost or increases in would shrink, the Earth’s overall albedo would decrease and more soil respiration leading to fast changes in the carbon cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Reliability of Climate Models, CMIP5
    Assessing the Reliability of Climate Models, CMIP5 Bart van den Hurk , Pascale Braconnot , Veronika Eyring , Pierre Friedlingstein , Peter Gleckler , Reto Knutti , and Joao Teixeira Abstract In spite of the yet incomplete subsample of the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) model ensemble to date, evaluation of these models is underway. Novel diagnostics and analysis methods are being utilized in order to explore the skill of particular processes, the degree to which models have improved since CMIP3, and particular features of the hindcasts, decadal and centennial projections. These assessments strongly benefi t from the increasing availability of state-of-the-art data sets and model output processing techniques. Also paleo-climate analysis proves to be useful for demonstrating the ability of models to simulate climate conditions that are different from present day. The existence of an increasingly wide ensemble of model simulations re-emphasizes the need to carefully consider the implications of model spread. Disparity between projected results does imply that model uncertainty exists, but not necessarily refl ects a true estimate of this uncertainty. B. van den Hurk (*) Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) , AE De Bilt , Post Box 201 NL-3730 , The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] P. Braconnot Insitut Pierre Simon Laplace/Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement , unité mixte de recherches CEA-CNRS-UVSQ , Bât.712, Orme des Merisiers CE-Saclay , Gif sur Yvette Cedex F-91191 , France e-mail: [email protected] V. Eyring Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) , Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre (IPA) , Oberpfaffenhofen, Wessling 82234 , Germany e-mail: [email protected] P.
    [Show full text]
  • The PMIP4 Contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: Two Interglacials, Scientific Objective and Experimental Design for Holocene and Last Interglacial Simulations
    The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and last interglacial simulations Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY) Open Access ( Final Version ) Otto-Bleisner, B. L., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Lunt, D. J., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Capron, E., Carlson, A. E., Dutton, A., Fischer, H., Goelzer, H., Govin, A., Haywood, A., Joos, F., Legrande, A. N., Lipscomb, W. H., Lohmann, G., Mahowald, N., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Pausata, F. S.-R., Peterschmidt, J.-Y., Phipps, S. and Renssen, H. (2017) The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 2: two interglacials, scientific objective and experimental design for Holocene and last interglacial simulations. Geoscientific Model Development, 10 (11). pp. 3979-4003. ISSN 1991-9603 doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/68688/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 Publisher: European Geosciences Union All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3979–4003, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 © Author(s) 2017.
    [Show full text]