Software Engineering

Session 2 – Main Theme Software Development Lifecycles (SDLCs) Dr. Jean-Claude Franchitti

New York University Computer Science Department Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Presentation material partially based on textbook slides Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (7/e) by Roger S. Pressman Slides copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005, 2009, 2014

1 Agenda – Session Overview

1 Session Overview

2 Software Engineering LifeCycles (SDLCs)

3 Summary and Conclusion

2 What is the class about?

. Course description and syllabus: » http://www.nyu.edu/classes/jcf/g22.2440-001/ » http://www.cs.nyu.edu/courses/spring16/G22.2440-001/

. Textbooks: » Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach Roger S. Pressman McGraw-Hill Higher International ISBN-10: 0078022126, ISBN-13: 978-0078022128, 8th Edition (01/23/14) » Recommended: » Code Complete: A Practical Handbook of Software Construction, 2nd Edition » The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, 2nd Edition

3 Agenda

. Software Engineering Detailed . Process Models . Agile Development . Software Engineering Knowledge . Roles and Types of Standards . ISO 12207: Life Cycle Standard . IEEE Standards for Software Engineering Processes and Specifications . Summary and Conclusion . Readings . Assignment #1 . Course Project

4 Icons / Metaphors

Information

Common Realization

Knowledge/Competency Pattern

Governance

Alignment

Solution Approach

55 Agenda

1 Session Overview

2 Software Engineering LifeCycles (SDLCs)

3 Summary and Conclusion

6 Agenda – Software Engineering LifeCycles (SDLCs)

2 Software Engineering LifeCycles SDLCs

Software Engineering Detailed

Process Models

Agile Development

Software Engineering Knowledge

Roles and Types of Standards

7 What is a SDLC

System Development Life Cycle: . It is about developing a software-driven solution to a business problem . It concerns a process which takes from two months to two years . This is called a System Development Life Cycle but it should really be called a (Business) Solution Development Life Cycle

8 Software Engineering (1/2)

. Some realities . A concerted effort should be made to understand the problem before a software solution is developed . Design becomes a pivotal activity . Software should exhibit high quality . Software should be maintainable . The seminal definition . Software engineering is the establishment and use of sound engineering principles in order to obtain economically software that is reliable and works efficiently on real machines

9 Software Engineering (2/2)

. The IEEE definition . Software Engineering: . (1) The application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the development, operation, and maintenance of software; that is, the application of engineering to software . (2) The study of approaches as in (1)

10 A Layered Technology

tools

methods

process model

a “quality” focus

Software Engineering

11 A Process Framework

Process framework Framework activities work tasks work products milestones & deliverables QA checkpoints Umbrella Activities

12 Framework Activities

. Communication . Planning . Modeling . Analysis of requirements . Design . Construction . Code generation . Testing . Deployment

13 Umbrella Activities

. Software project management . Formal technical reviews . Software quality assurance . Software configuration management . Work product preparation and production . Reusability management . Measurement . Risk management

14 Adapting a Process Model

. The overall flow of activities, actions, and tasks and the interdependencies among them . The degree to which actions and tasks are defined within each framework activity . The degree to which work products are identified and required . The manner which quality assurance activities are applied . The manner in which project tracking and control activities are applied . The overall degree of detail and rigor with which the process is described . The degree to which the customer and other stakeholders are involved with the project . The level of autonomy given to the software team . The degree to which team organization and roles are prescribed

15 The Essence of Practice

. Polya* suggests: 1. Understand the problem (communication and analysis) 2. Plan a solution (modeling and software design) 3. Carry out the plan (code generation) 4. Examine the result for accuracy (testing and quality assurance) * http://www.stevemcconnell.com/rl-top10.htm

16 Understand the Problem

. Who has a stake in the solution to the problem? That is, who are the stakeholders? . What are the unknowns? What data, functions, and features are required to properly solve the problem? . Can the problem be compartmentalized? Is it possible to represent smaller problems that may be easier to understand? . Can the problem be represented graphically? Can an analysis model be created?

17 Plan the Solution

. Have you seen similar problems before? Are there patterns that are recognizable in a potential solution? Is there existing software that implements the data, functions, and features that are required? . Has a similar problem been solved? If so, are elements of the solution reusable? . Can subproblems be defined? If so, are solutions readily apparent for the subproblems? . Can you represent a solution in a manner that leads to effective implementation? Can a design model be created?

18 Carry Out the Plan

. Does the solution conform to the plan? Is source code traceable to the design model? . Is each component part of the solution provably correct? Has the design and code been reviewed, or better, have correctness proofs been applied to algorithm?

19 Examine the Result

. Is it possible to test each component part of the solution? Has a reasonable testing strategy been implemented? . Does the solution produce results that conform to the data, functions, and features that are required? Has the software been validated against all stakeholder requirements?

20 David Hooker’s General Principles*

. 1: The Reason It All Exists . 2: KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid!) . 3: Maintain the Vision . 4: What You Produce, Others Will Consume . 5: Be Open to the Future . 6: Plan Ahead for Reuse . 7: Think!

* http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SevenPrinciplesOfSoftwareDevelopment

21 Software Myths

. Affect managers, customers (and other non- technical stakeholders) and practitioners . Are believable because they often have elements of truth, but … . Invariably lead to bad decisions, therefore … . Insist on reality as you navigate your way through software engineering

22 How It all Starts

. Every software project is precipitated by some business need . The need to correct a defect in an existing application; . The need to the need to adapt a ‘legacy system’ to a changing business environment; . The need to extend the functions and features of an existing application, or . The need to create a new product, service, or system.

23 SDLC Characteristics

. Whatever form it takes, it is always followed by a maintenance cycle: . Maintenance is the most expensive part . If all the steps are done carefully maintenance is reduced . For maintenance to be effective , documentation must exist

24 Business Solution Characteristics

. A software-driven solution consists of two parts: . Model . Prototypes . Diagrams and supporting Documents . System . Hardware . Software

25 Some Definitions (1/3)

. Prototype . An initial software-driven solution usually done with a rapid development tool . Usually has limited functionality . Users can see results very quickly . Planning . The process of gathering what is needed to solve a business problem . Includes a feasibility study . Includes project steps

26 Some Definitions (2/3)

. Analysis . The process of determining detail requirements in the form of a model . Design . The process of drawing blueprints for a new system at a high-level first then at a detailed level . Construction . The actual coding of the model into a software package . Uses one or more programming languages . Java . C# . C++ . etc.

27 Some Definitions (3/3)

. Implementation . Doing whatever is necessary to startup a system . Includes: . Database . Networks . Hardware configuration . Maintenance . Doing whatever is necessary to keep a system running . Includes: . Repairs to correct errors . Enhancements to accommodate changes in requirements

28 Deliverables

. Deliverables consist mainly of diagrams and their supporting documentation . For example: . Models that emphasize dynamics . Models that emphasize structure . Models can be used for specifying the outcome of analysis . Models can be used for specifying the outcome of design

29 Sample Deliverables – Planning (1/3)

. Planning: . System Functions . A simple list of each requirement a system must do . For example: . record video rental . calculate fine . System Attributes . A simple property describing each requirement of a system . For example: . record video rental under 15 seconds . calculate fine and return response in 5 seconds

30 Sample Deliverables – Planning (2/3)

. Planning:

Environmental Diagram

Rent Video Video Store Information System Pay Employees Clerk

31 Sample Deliverables – Planning (3/3)

. Planning: . Prototype . Recall it is a first system usually done with a rapid development tool . Since users can see results very quickly they will pay attention . Final product is seldom created in same tool as the prototype

32 Sample Deliverables - Analysis

. Analysis: . Use case . Shows the dynamics between the users (actors) of the system and the system itself . This is a narrative representation . Conceptual Diagram . Shows the structure of the objects and their relationships . This is a graphical representation . System Sequence Diagram . Shows the dynamics between the users (actors) of the system and the system itself . This is a graphical representation . Contracts . Shows the state of each object before each action . This is a narrative representation

33 Sample High-Level Architecture Design Conceptual Blueprint

e-Business Back-Office e-Business Services Users— Connectivity Portal Systems

Client

Web Client Administrator

Sales TradiDesk XML/Web Enabling Component Legacy Manager Systems VPN User Facilities Interfaces Marketing

Facilitator

Phone

Visitor

Support PDA User XML-Based Application Data Legacy Data Databases Facilitator Administrator

Data Repositories

34 Sample High-Level Architecture Design Logical Blueprint

Business Users Connectivity e-Business e-Business Services Legacy Systems Functions Portal

Facilitators Facilitator Interfaces University Intranet LAN

PBX-Based Service PBX-Based Services Call Forwarding, Teleconferencing, etc. Presentation Enabling: Router Authoring NT & Portal Mgmt. Component Manager Posting Unix Front Office Apps XML/Web Enabling Facilities Back-Office Systems Interface Application Server Q&A Enabling: University Authoring Front Office Apps Client Request Handler Internet or Chat Platform University Systems Posting Intranet LANs Educational Applications Firewall Application Logic Firewall Professor (Custom Java Applications) Chatroom Component Win Ft Off. & Web Apps Client Request Handler 2000 (via VPN) Maintenance Apps Subnet (within DMZ) Client Administration Data Mining ChatUser Component Login, Authentification, Software / Global Content Web Server Non-Repudiation Monitoring / Backup Client & System Administration Component Telephony Svcs Proxy Server Registration Systems Presentation Enabling: Faxback Web-Enabled Entitlement & Security Authoring IVR Component Accounting Systems Applications Servlet Engine JSP Engine Q&A Enabling: NT & Facilitator Application, Unix Integration Front Office Apps Channel, and Client/ Sales/Marketing Systems System Admin Interfaces System Support: Servlets/JSPs: University Business Intelligence session hdlr Client Support Systtems Monitoring (Customer Analysis, Course Planning) Support Services System Admin. Interne or SMIL presentation hdlr (carreer management, alumni Q&A hdlr relations, library support, etc.) Help Desk Intranet LANs Customer Care Services XML Core Services Teaching (Call Center Support: Educational & Systems) XML MOM/POP hdlr (Doc Hdlr, Version Manager) etc. Assistant Win Collaborative Applications 2000 Ft Off. & Web Apps (2D Avatars, Classroom Navigation, Chat, Events) Session/State Mgmt. Internal Administration (via VPN) "Lights Out" Svcs System Administration Servlets Process Automation & Course Development Systems XML Dynamic Content Mgmt. Email Fax XML, Email, Fax "Lights Out" Services Interfaces Facilitator/Client Admin. Servlets Course Production Systems Site Development Svc.

Client Interfaces Client Request Handler API DataWarehouse-Driven Human Resources Systems Processing Clients Telephony-Based Payroll Systtems Services XML-based presentation

University Internet LAN Internet University Component Manager Connectors oriented publishing Customer Calls Handling Firewall Course Production Systems) Support Systtems (ACD, Flex-Routing, Call Center Mgmt.) templates Telephony Svcs CSR Assisted Services (Product Support, Issue Resolution, Proactive IVR Account Mgmt.) Integrated Data Architecture Layer Presentation Enabling: Querying Web-Enabled Locating Win Applications Database Management Systems (DBMS) Viewing 2000 Web Applications Client Interface (Presentation querying, locating, and viewing - Q&A Enabling: Questions capture and Q&A viewring) Capture Internet-Based Services (XML interfaces, Email, Browser) Viewing Customer Profiles XML SMIL Data Local Account Data Personalization Interface Time Critical Students University MOM & POP XLF Data Entitlement/Security Data Information Internet LAN Channels Interface Templates Operational Data etc. (Browsers, PDAs, WAPs) Real Time Services In Memory Database Content-Mgmt Repository Global Application Data Replicas Legacy Operational Data (Web Channels, Chat, TV Events, etc.) Self Care Services (tutorials, online help)

Remote Training Interface University Intranet WANIntranet University Legend: Collaborative Applications Educational Research PDA/WAP Applications Desktop Operational Data Store (2D Avatars, Classroom Navigation, Chat, Events) Educational News In scope Filesystems Client Knowledge Engine etc. Voice/Data Integration Metadata Repository Teleweb / Web Integration Services Out of scope WAP Server (Consolidated Messaging, Telephone-Based Web Services, Video Conf., etc.) Business Information Warehouse Third Party Data

35 Sample High-Level Architecture Design Physical Blueprint

University Systems & Network Management Environment

University Mgmt. Firewall Tape Silo Veritas Network Backup (shared service)

Component Manager Chat Platform

WebLogic 2.6 SunE420/Solaris Connects to Firewall / IIOP Proxy Server Application Logic all devices below Sun E220/Solaris 2.6 ChatUser Component Checkpoint Firewall-1

Stonebeat ChatRoom Component Remote-1 NFR Flight Recorder Flight NFR IONA Wonderwall Proxy Server

XML/Web Enabling Facilities Application Support Services

50GB Disk Array Disk 50GB enCommerceGetAccess 2.6 SunE420/Solaris

Server XML Core Services

TomCatjsp engine engine TomCatservlet sever HTTP Apache SSL accelerator nCipher 2.6 SunE220/Solaris Intrusion Session/State/EOD Mgmt Detection Load Balancers Dynamic Content Mgmt Alteon AC3 Web Server Router Servlets & JSP Security &

Engines

Stonebeat Firewall-1 Checkpoint Sun E220/Solaris 2.6 SunE220/Solaris Entitlements Srv SMIL Data

XLF Data

Sybase 11.9.2 Sybase Array Disk 50GB Firewall 2.6 SunE4500/Solaris Operational Data Client Request Handler Internet HSRP Global Application Data Servlets/JSPs: - session handler - SMIL presentation handler - Q&A handler XML POP - Cocoon 2 XML POP handler Database Server Templates

Content Mgmt. Repository Firewall Back-Office Systems

Router Sun E420/Solaris 2.6

Remote-1 Recorder Flight NFR University Intranet LAN (dual) LAN Intranet University 200GB raid5 Disk Array Client Administration iPlanet Enterprise Svr Webtrends

University Internet LAN (dual) LAN Internet University Internal Administration Admin/Reporting Students, Professor, and TA Interfaces Intrusion Server Intrusion Detection Web-Enabled Detection Applications

Clients/Facilitators Facilitators, and Production Interfaces Application/Admin Client Interfaces Workstation XML, Email, Fax (e.g.,SOJA Applet) Web-Enabled University Applications Collaborative Applications Intranet LAN Professor/TA Facilitator (e.g., Chat Applet) Application and Client/System Channels Interface Administration Professor/TA Interfaces Workstation Firewall Sun E220/Solaris 2.6 Program Checkpoint Firewall-1 Administrator Stonebeat Intrusion Detection NFR Flight Recorder Remote-1

36 Sample Deliverables - Design

. Design: . Interaction Diagram . Shows the interaction between objects . This is a graphic representation . It is a dynamic blueprint . Class Diagram . Shows the structure between objects . Shows the structure inside objects . This is a graphic representation . It is a static blueprint

37 Agenda – Software Engineering Lifecycles (SDLCs)

2 Software Engineering LifeCycles SDLCs

Software Engineering Detailed

Process Models

Agile Development

Software Engineering Knowledge

Roles and Types of Standards

38 A Generic Process Model

39 Process Flow

40 Identifying a Task Set

. A task set defines the actual work to be done to accomplish the objectives of a software engineering action . A list of the tasks to be accomplished . A list of the work products to be produced . A list of the quality assurance filters to be applied

41 Process Patterns

. A process pattern . describes a process-related problem that is encountered during software engineering work, . identifies the environment in which the problem has been encountered, and . suggests one or more proven solutions to the problem . Stated in more general terms, a process pattern provides you with a template [Amb98] - a consistent method for describing problem solutions within the context of the software process

42 Process Pattern Types

. Stage patterns - defines a problem associated with a framework activity for the process . Task patterns - defines a problem associated with a software engineering action or work task and relevant to successful software engineering practice . Phase patterns - define the sequence of framework activities that occur with the process, even when the overall flow of activities is iterative in nature

43 Prescriptive Models

. Prescriptive process models advocate an orderly approach to software engineering That leads to a few questions … . If prescriptive process models strive for structure and order, are they inappropriate for a software world that thrives on change? . Yet, if we reject traditional process models (and the order they imply) and replace them with something less structured, do we make it impossible to achieve coordination and coherence in software work?

44 The Waterfall Model Revisited

Communicat ion project init iat ion Planning requirement gat hering estimating Modeling scheduling analysis tracking Const ruct ion design code Deployment t est delivery support f eedback

45 The V-Model

46 The Incremental Model

increment # n

C o m m u n i c a t i o n P l a n n i n g

M o d e l i n g analy s is C o n s t r u c t i o n des ign c ode D e p l o y m e n t t es t d e l i v e r y f e e d b a c k

delivery of increment # 2 nt h increment

C o m m u n i c a t i o n P l a n n i n g

M o d e l i n g analy s is C o n s t r u c t i o n des ign c ode D e p l o y m e n t t es t d e l i v e r y delivery of f e e d b a c k increment # 1 2nd increment

C o m m u n i c a t i o n P l a n n i n g M o d e l i n g

analy s is C o n s t r u c t i o n des ign c ode D e p l o y m e n t t es t d e l i v e r y delivery of f e e d b a c k 1st increment

project calendar time

47 Evolutionary Models: Prototyping

Qu icQuickk p la n plan Communicat ion communication

MoModelingd e lin g Quick Qu i cdesignk d e s ig n

DepDeploymentloyment Ddeliverye live r y& Construction of prototypeCon st ruct ion &feedback Fe e db ack Construction ofof prototype prot ot ype

48 Evolutionary Models: The Spiral Model Revisited

planning estimation scheduling risk analysis

communication

modeling analysis design start

deployment construction delivery code feedback test

49 Evolutionary Models: Concurrent

none

Modeling act ivit y

represents the state Under of a software engineering activity or task development

Await ing changes

Under review

Under revision

Baselined

Done

50 Still Other Process Models

. Component based development—the process to apply when reuse is a development objective . Formal methods—emphasizes the mathematical specification of requirements . AOSD—provides a process and methodological approach for defining, specifying, designing, and constructing aspects . Unified Process—a “use-case driven, architecture-centric, iterative and incremental” software process closely aligned with the Unified Modeling Language (UML)

51 The Unified Process (UP)

Eelaborationlaborat io n

inceptionIncept ion

const ruct ion Release t ransit ion soft ware increment

product ion

52 UP Phases

UP Phases

Inception Elaboration Construction Transition Production Workflows

Requirements

Analysis

Design

Implementation

Test

Support

Iterations #1 #2 #n-1 #n

53 UP Work Products

Inception phase

Elaboration phase Vision document Init ial use-case model Construction phase Init ial project glossary Use-case model Init ial business case Supplement ary requirement s Transition phase Init ial risk assessment . including non-funct ional Design model Project plan, Analysis model Soft ware component s phases and it erat ions. Soft ware archit ect ure Int egrat ed soft ware Delivered soft ware increment Business model, Descript ion. increment Bet a t est report s if necessary. Execut able archit ect ural Test plan and procedure General user feedback One or more prot ot ypes prot ot ype. I n c e p t i o Test cases n Preliminary design model Support document at ion Revised risk list user manuals Project plan including inst allat ion manuals it erat ion plan descript ion of current adapt ed workflows increment milest ones t echnical work product s Preliminary user manual

54 Personal Software Process (PSP)

. Planning. This activity isolates requirements and develops both size and resource estimates. In addition, a defect estimate (the number of defects projected for the work) is made. All metrics are recorded on worksheets or templates. Finally, development tasks are identified and a project schedule is created. . High-level design. External specifications for each component to be constructed are developed and a component design is created. Prototypes are built when uncertainty exists. All issues are recorded and tracked. . High-level design review. Formal verification methods (Chapter 21 of the course textbook) are applied to uncover errors in the design. Metrics are maintained for all important tasks and work results. . Development. The component level design is refined and reviewed. Code is generated, reviewed, compiled, and tested. Metrics are maintained for all important tasks and work results. . Postmortem. Using the measures and metrics collected (this is a substantial amount of data that should be analyzed statistically), the effectiveness of the process is determined. Measures and metrics should provide guidance for modifying the process to improve its effectiveness.

55 Team Software Process (TSP)

. Build self-directed teams that plan and track their work, establish goals, and own their processes and plans. These can be pure software teams or integrated product teams (IPT) of three to about 20 engineers. . Show managers how to coach and motivate their teams and how to help them sustain peak performance. . Accelerate software process improvement by making CMM Level 5 behavior normal and expected. . The Capability Maturity Model (CMM), a measure of the effectiveness of a software process, is discussed in Chapter 30 of the course textbook. . Provide improvement guidance to high-maturity organizations. . Facilitate university teaching of industrial-grade team skills.

56 CMM & PSP/TSP (http://www.sei.cmu.edu)

. The Capability Maturity Model for Software (SW- CMM) is used by organizations to guide their software process improvement efforts . Personal Software Process . http://www.sei.cmu.edu/tsp/psp.html . The Team Software Process (TSP) was designed to implement effective, high-maturity processes for project teams . If all projects in an organization are using the TSP, does the organization exhibit the characteristics of high process maturity, as described in the SW- CMM? . http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/02.reports/pdf/02tr008.pdf

57 SEI’s IDEALModel

. IDEAL is an organizational improvement model

58 Team Exercise #1 – Groups will present in class

. Research and put together a comparative write-up or traditional Process Models: . Waterfall . V . Phased . Evolutionary . Spiral . CBSE . RUP . PSP/TSP

59 Agenda – Software Engineering Lifecycles (SDLCs)

2 Software Engineering LifeCycles SDLCs

Software Engineering Detailed

Process Models

Agile Development

Software Engineering Knowledge

Roles and Types of Standards

60 The Manifesto for Agile Software Development

“We are uncovering better ways of developing software by doing it and helping others do it. Through this work we have come to value:

•Individuals and interactions over processes and tools •Working software over comprehensive documentation •Customer collaboration over contract negotiation •Responding to change over following a plan

That is, while there is value in the itemsKent on Beck the etright, al we value the items on the left more.”

61 What is “Agility”?

. Effective (rapid and adaptive) response to change . Effective communication among all stakeholders . Drawing the customer onto the team . Organizing a team so that it is in control of the work performed Yielding … . Rapid, incremental delivery of software

62 Agility and the Cost of Change

63 An Agile Process

. Is driven by customer descriptions of what is required (scenarios) . Recognizes that plans are short-lived . Develops software iteratively with a heavy emphasis on construction activities . Delivers multiple ‘software increments’ . Adapts as changes occur

64 Agility Principles (1/2)

1. Our highest priority is to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software. 2. Welcome changing requirements, even late in development. Agile processes harness change for the customer's competitive advantage. 3. Deliver working software frequently, from a couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a preference to the shorter timescale. 4. Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project. 5. Build projects around motivated individuals. Give them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done. 6. The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face–to–face conversation. 65 Agility Principles (2/2)

7. Working software is the primary measure of progress. 8. Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely. 9. Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility. 10. Simplicity – the art of maximizing the amount of work not done – is essential. 11. The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self–organizing teams. 12. At regular intervals, the team reflects on how to become more effective, then tunes and adjusts its behavior accordingly.

66 Human Factors Revisited

. the process molds to the needs of the people and team, not the other way around . key traits must exist among the people on an agile team and the team itself: » Competence. » Common focus. » Collaboration. » Decision-making ability. » Fuzzy problem-solving ability. » Mutual trust and respect. » Self-organization.

67 eXtreme Programming (XP) - http://www.extremeprogramming.org/

. A lightweight software methodology . Few rules and practices or ones which are easy to follow . Emphasizes customer involvement and promotes team work . See XP’s rules and practices at http://www.extremeprogramming.org/rules.html

68 Extreme Programming (XP) (1/3)

. The most widely used agile process, originally proposed by Kent Beck . XP Planning . Begins with the creation of “user stories” . Agile team assesses each story and assigns a cost . Stories are grouped to for a deliverable increment . A commitment is made on delivery date . After the first increment “project velocity” is used to help define subsequent delivery dates for other increments

69 Extreme Programming (XP) (2/3)

. XP Design . Follows the KISS principle . Encourage the use of CRC cards (see textbook ch 8) . For difficult design problems, suggests the creation of “spike solutions”—a design prototype . Encourages “refactoring”—an iterative refinement of the internal program design . XP Coding . Recommends the construction of a unit test for a store before coding commences . Encourages “pair programming” . XP Testing . All unit tests are executed daily . “Acceptance tests” are defined by the customer and excuted to assess customer visible functionality 70 Extreme Programming (XP) (3/3)

spike solut ions simple design prot ot ypes CRC cards user st ories values accept ance t est crit eria it erat ion plan

refact oring

pair programming

Release software increment unit t est project velocity computed cont inuous int egrat ion

accept ance t est ing 71 XP Project Lifecycle

72 eXtreme Programming (XP) Map

73 XP Iteration Planning

74 XP Unit Testing

75 Agile Modeling & XP Summarized

. Practices-based software process whose scope is to describe how to model and document in an effective and “agile” manner . One goal is to address the issue of how to apply modeling techniques on software projects taking an agile approach such as: . eXtreme Programming (XP) . Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) . SCRUM . etc. . Using modeling throughout the XP lifecycle . http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/agileModelingXPLifecycle.htm . Additional information . http://www.agilemodeling.com/ . http://www.agilemodeling.com/resources.htm

76 Adaptive Software Development (1/2)

. Originally proposed by Jim Highsmith . ASD — distinguishing features . Mission-driven planning . Component-based focus . Uses “time-boxing” (See textbook Chapter 24) . Explicit consideration of risks . Emphasizes collaboration for requirements gathering . Emphasizes “learning” throughout the process

77 Adaptive Software Development (2/2)

adapt ive cycle planning Requirement s gat hering uses mission st at ement JAD project const raint s mini-specs basic requirement s t ime-boxed release plan

Release software increment adjustments for subsequent cycles component s implement ed/ t est ed focus groups for feedback formal t echnical reviews post mort ems

78 Dynamic Systems Development Method (1/2)

. Promoted by the DSDM Consortium (www.dsdm.org) . DSDM—distinguishing features . Similar in most respects to XP and/or ASD . Nine guiding principles . Active user involvement is imperative. . DSDM teams must be empowered to make decisions. . The focus is on frequent delivery of products. . Fitness for business purpose is the essential criterion for acceptance of deliverables. . Iterative and incremental development is necessary to converge on an accurate business solution. . All changes during development are reversible. . Requirements are baselined at a high level . Testing is integrated throughout the life-cycle.

79 Dynamic Systems Development Method (2/2)

DSDM Life Cycle (with permission of the DSDM consortium) 80 Scrum

. Originally proposed by Schwaber and Beedle . Scrum—distinguishing features . Development work is partitioned into “packets” . Testing and documentation are on-going as the product is constructed . Work occurs in “sprints” and is derived from a “backlog” of existing requirements . Meetings are very short and sometimes conducted without chairs . “demos” are delivered to the customer with the time-box allocated

81 Scrum Process Overview

82 Scrum Timeline Breakdown

Project Start Project End . Agile based projects are broken down into Releases

. At the end of each Release, a

2-3 months working version of the product is

Release 1 Release 2 Release 3 delivered to the Business Users . Each Release is made up of a number of sprints

2-4 weeks . At the end of each Sprint, a Sprint 1 Sprint 2 Sprint n working version of the product is deployed with incremental functionalities added over the Daily previous sprint

Scrum 1 Scrum 2 Scrum 3 Scrum 4 Scrum N . During each Sprint, daily scrum calls are held where status update is provided by the team

83 Crystal

. Proposed by Cockburn and Highsmith . Crystal—distinguishing features . Actually a family of process models that allow “maneuverability” based on problem characteristics . Face-to-face communication is emphasized . Suggests the use of “reflection workshops” to review the work habits of the team

84 Feature Driven Development (1/2)

. Originally proposed by Peter Coad et al . FDD—distinguishing features . Emphasis is on defining “features” . a feature “is a client-valued function that can be implemented in two weeks or less.” . Uses a feature template . the a(n)