This File Copyright © The Geological Association of Canada
PLEASE RESPECT COPYRIGHT Considerable investment goes into the production of any publication. Recovering that investment helps ensure the publishing program can continue to provide books at reasonable prices, and continue to create publishing opportunities to future authors.
This digital file is provided to the Lead Author on condition: * that the digital file remains in the possession of the Author(s), and is not distributed, shared or forwarded in any manner (except for individual study) without prior written approval from GAC®; * that the file is not manipulated in any way; * that it is understood the digital file may not be an exact representation of the original hardcopy text. As such, GAC® will be held blameless for any discrepancy between digital and printed versions; and * that printouts are distributed free of charge to colleagues and students for individual study, and do not appear in coursebooks or other compilation works (digital, printed or otherwise) for which direct or indirect payment is expected without prior arrangement with Access Copyright, the Canadian Copyright agency: Access Copyright The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency 1 Yonge Street, Suite 800 Toronto, Ontario M5E 1E5
www.accesscopyright.ca
Phone: 416-868-1620 Fax: 416-868-1621 Toll-Free: 1-800-893-5777 Email: [email protected] In the paper by Oboh-Ikuenobe et al., Table 1 (p. 206) is missing part B, as follows: Anatomy of epicontinental flooding: Late Albian-Early Cenomanian of the southern U.S. Western Interior Basin
8 Thick to very thick- Medium-scale planar cross bedded Plant fragment impression Tidal channel bedded fine-grained with subdominant current and common; burrows rare, sandstone oscillation ripple lamination; and mostly Arenicolites herringbone cross-bedding common; ripple-bounded planar foresets common; bound by shallow, wide channel scours; scours amalgamated 9 “Wavy bedded “ thin to Sandstone - mixed current and Plant fragment and log Subtidal bar/sheet medium tabular-to- oscillation ripples grading laterally impressions; rare bivalve slightly lenticular beds locally to small-scale planar cross molds; one ankylosaur of fine-grained bedding in thicker beds; ripple track site; bioturbation sandstone interbedded foresets are commonly clay-draped; minimal, but burrows and with thin to very thin load casts common trails are common and beds of silty shale Silty shale - blue to dark gray, include Teredolites, thickly laminated to rippled; siderite Skolithos, Planolites, concretions present locally Arenicolites, and rare 10a Blue-gray muddy Mudstone/siltstone - massive to VeryThalassinoides minor burrowing and Brackish to fresh siltstone with rare locally thickly laminated local (Arenicolites and water estuary Fill widely dispersed very Sandstone - current and oscillation Planolites) in sandstone; thin beds of very fine- rippled occurring in lenticular units root casts present, local grained sandstone floored by channel scours root fragments; spores Locally capped by rooted horizons common
10b Dark gray to dark blue- Thickly laminated, moderately Locally bioturbated Brackish to gray siltstone indurated, fine silty mudstone, burrowing consists of marine estuary Erratumoccurring in lenticular units floored Teredolites, Skolithos, fill by channel scours; interfingers Planolites, and laterally with lithofacies Arenicolites, logs noted assemblage 6 locally and commonly locally; spores and grades to assemblage 10a dinoflagellates common
11 Siltstone/mudstone Blue-gray to dark gray rippled to Rooted horizons and Prograding coarsening up to fine- thinly laminated thin-bedded dinosaur tracks on top shoreface grained medium siltstone and mudstone transitioning surfaces locally; bedded sandstone up into ripple, parallel, and locally commonly bioturbated; planar to hummocky cross-bedded burrows are common and medium bedded sandstone include: Skolithos, Arenicolites, Thalassinoides, Planolites, Ophiomorpha, and Rhizocorallium 12a Shale Thickly to thinly laminated dark Skolithos, Arenicolites, Restricted basinal gray very fissile shale, jarosite Planolites and marine found locally; tabular Thalassinoides, dinoflagellates common 12b Shale Thickly to thinly laminated dark Skolithos, Arenicolites, Open marine gray, very fissile shale; abundant Planolites and jarosite; tabular Thalassinoides, dinoflagellates common; abundant foraminifers
Oboh-Ikuenobe et al. — Page 206 Table 1b From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
ANATOMY OF EPICONTINENTAL FLOODING: LATE ALBIAN–EARLY CENOMANIAN OF THE SOUTHERN U.S. WESTERN INTERIOR BASIN
Francisca E. Oboh-Ikuenobe1, John M. Holbrook2 , Robert W. Scott3, Stavena L. Akins4, Michael J. Evetts5, Don G. Benson6 and Lisa M. Pratt7
1 Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology (formerly University of Missouri–Rolla), Rolla, Missouri 65409-0410 U.S.A.; [email protected] 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019-0049, U.S.A. 3Precision Stratigraphy Associates and Tulsa University, RR 3 Box 103-3, Cleveland, Oklahoma 74020, U.S.A. 4225 Garbarino Street, Festus, Missouri 63028, U.S.A. 51227 Venice Street, Longmont, Colorado 80501, U.S.A. 6Theirf Group, Inc., 1522 Ehlinger Road, Fayetteville, Texas 78940, U.S.A. 7Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-1405, U.S.A.
ABSTRACT RESUME
The mid-Cretaceous (Late Albian–Early Cenomanian) La succession sédimentaire du Crétacé moyen (Albien sedimentary succession between Wyoming and Texas, Supérieur–Cénomanien Inférieur) entre le Wyoming et which is generally attributed to transgression during the le Texas, qu’on attribue généralement à la transgression early part of the third-order Greenhorn cycle, reveals pendant la première partie du cycle de Greenhorn de troisième ordre, révèle trois séquences minces d’une très three thin sequences of unusually large, regional extent, grande étendue régionale, qui se sont mises en place pendant deposited during three higher order marine cycles. These trois cycles marins de plus haut ordre. Ces trois séquences three sequences are preserved in outcrop sections and wells sont conservées dans des sections d’affleurement et dans in central and southeastern Colorado, northeastern New des puits au centre et au sud-est du Colorado, au nord-est Mexico and northwestern Oklahoma. We conducted an du Nouveau-Mexique et au nord-ouest de l’Oklahoma. integrated study utilizing sedimentology, micropaleontology, Nous avons mené une étude intégrée, dans laquelle nous palynology and organic geochemistry in order to understand avons utilisé la sédimentologie, la micropaléontologie, la the environmental details of the marine–terrestrial transitions palynologie et la géochimie organique pour comprendre les during a continental flooding event and how they fit into détails environnementaux des transitions terrestres marines the larger picture of the first-order Zuni Sequence. Each of durant un événement d’inondation continentale, et comment the three sequences (referred to as sequences 3.1, 3.2 and ceux-ci prennent place dans le plus grand cadre de la Séquence Zuni du premier ordre. Chacune des trois séquences 4) records biofacies shifts of over 200 km within vertical (appelées séquences 3.1, 3.2 et 4) enregistre des mouvements sections of less than 20 m that mark ephemeral Tethyan de biofaciès de plus de 200 km dans des sections verticales flooding into southeastern Colorado. In each sequence, basal de moins de 20 km, qui marquent une inondation téthysienne fluvial–paralic sandstone with non-marine fossil assemblages éphémère au sud-est du Colorado. Dans chaque séquence, du and isotopic and palynofacies signals passes vertically into grès basal fluvial–paralique avec des assemblages de fossiles marine-influenced shale and sandstone. Marine fossils, non-marins et des signaux isotopiques et de palynofaciès, mainly as moderately diverse agglutinate foraminiferal biotas, passe verticalement dans du schiste d’influence marine et nearshore dinoflagellate cysts and acritarchs, and Skolithos du grès. Des fossiles marins, pour la plupart dans la forme ichnofauna, become progressively poorer up-dip until only de biotes foraminifères agglutinés assez diverses, de cystes brackish-tolerant ichnofauna, sparse agglutinate foraminifers dinoflagellates et d’acritarches littoraux, et de l’ichnofaune and non-marine palynomorphs remain. Two of the three thin Skolithos, deviennent de plus en plus pauvres jusqu’à ce sequences record previously unrecognized transgressions qu’il n’y reste que de l’ichnofaune tolérante d’eau saumâtre, quelques forminafères agglutinés épars et des palynomorphes that appear to have lasted no more than a million years each, non-marins. Deux des trois séquences minces enregistrent accompanied by high amount of freshwater input. Therefore, des transgressions qu’on n’a pas jusqu’ici reconnues, et dont the regional scale of this database covering as it does a chacune ne semble pas avoir duré plus d’un million d’années, considerable portion of the southern Western Interior Basin, accompagnées d’un grand flux d’eau douce. Par conséquent, provides an instructive example of the sedimentary and puisque cette base de données couvre une si grande partie du biotic response to transgressions across low-relief margins Bassin Intérieur de l’Ouest, elle fournit un exemple instructif of epeiric seas. de la réponse sédimentaire et biotique à des transgressions à travers des marges bas-relief de mers épicontinentales. From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
202 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
INTRODUCTION of the Late Albian (approximately 103–99 Ma) (Williams and Stelck, 1975; Kauffman, 1977, 1984; Kauffman and The northward encroachment of the Tethys from the Gulf Caldwell, 1993; Scott et al., 1998). These provinces became of Mexico during the middle part of the Cretaceous has separated during the latest Albian and earliest Cenomanian long been recognized as the first stage of the larger Zuni but the fully connected seaway that spanned Late Cretaceous flooding event that submerged most of the North American time was reestablished about 95.8 Ma (date 25—Obradovich, Western Interior during Late Cretaceous time (Sloss, 1963). 1993) in the Middle Cenomanian (Greenhorn cycle), when Traditional sequence models of mid-Cretaceous Western the Thatcher Limestone Member of the Graneros Formation Interior Basin suggest that the Zuni flooding occurred in was deposited. two advances and retreats. The first north–south connection However, depositional events are poorly known during between the Boreal and Tethyan biotic provinces (the this important time of separation between continent-wide Kiowa–Skull Creek cycle) was made during the early part flooding episodes because of the absence of marine marker 107º 105º Localities 103º 40º BD Amoco Bounds Well N I-70 I-70 Denver Roadcut NW Nordman Well W E Nebraska FC Fountain Creek VR Vertical Redwing S Denver CC Cucharus Canyon I-70 HB Higbee NW PCB Bibber Ranch ES Earrington Springs JM John Martin Reservoir 38º BD FC CA Cahill Pueblo JM MC Mule Creek HC Horse Creek CC HB ES MC Colorado VR HC PH Plug Hat PCB PH EL Etling Lake CA Kansas PR/SR Perky/Shields Ranch BM EL K Kenton TG CL BM Black Mesa Ranch K PR/SR Oklahoma CL Cross L Ranch TG Tollgate Pass Los Alamos Texas 36º New Mexico RM RM Romeroville Gap LM Liberty Mesa LR Fife-Lindsey Ranch LM Tucumcari Albuquerque LR
0 Kilometres 100
Map Area
Figure 1. Map showing the locations of the stratigraphic sections studied in the southern Western Interior Basin. Inset paleogeographic map is modified from Williams and Stelck (1975). From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 203
beds and post-Cretaceous erosion in the southern Western 0.61 Ma just below the Thatcher Limestone Member of the Interior Basin. Several key questions about the flooding Graneros Shale (Obradovich, 1993). of the basin have not been fully addressed: (1) When In the south-central part of the basin at Etling Lake, Black and where did the southern Tethyan Sea connect with the Mesa State Park in Oklahoma, the Mesa Rica Sandstone is northern Boreal Sea?; (2) Were there significant short-term differentiated into three members, the Lower, Middle and transgressions associated with Zuni flooding of the basin?; (3) Upper members (Fig. 4A). The Lower Member is thick- What were the conditions of the marine basin in the incipient bedded sandstone bounded by SB 3.1 at the base and above southern Western Interior Cretaceous seas, and how did the by TS 3.1, a sharp transgressive contact. The overlying flooding interact with the terrestrial environment? and; (4) Middle Member of the Mesa Rica is composed of two What is the regional expression of terrestrial versus marine coarsening-upward siltstone–sandstone cycles representing environments during transgressions across the low-gradient floodplain and deltaic deposition. In comparison with the continental interior? In order to fill critical gaps that help amalgamated channel-belt sandstone Lower Member, the answer the above questions, we undertook a multi-proxy Middle Mesa Rica member has a higher ratio of fine-grained investigation of Upper Albian to Lower Cenomanian strata flood-basin strata to sandy channel-belt strata. This is typical utilizing sedimentology, micropaleontology, palynology and of the fluvial response to base-level rise during marine organic geochemistry. Our study area encompassed central transgression in areas landward of the shoreline (Wright and and southeastern Colorado northwestern New Mexico and Marriott, 1994; Shanley and McCabe, 1994; Holbrook et al., northwestern Oklahoma (Fig. 1). It appears that during the 2006). The top of the Middle Mesa Rica is marked by incised lowstand following the Kiowa–Skull Creek cycle, two short- surface SB 3.2. We note that the minor transgression of the term partial floodings invaded the southern and northern Middle Mesa Rica and surface SB 3.2 have not yet been ends of the Western Interior prior to full connection of the correlated into the Boreal realm, although there are cycles Greenhorn cycle. By integrating our data with existing in the equivalent Muddy (Weimer, 1984, 1990; Sonnenburg, information on the south-central Western Interior Basin, new 1987; Scott et al., 1998) and Viking sandstones (e.g., Walker details have emerged about the Greenhorn flooding event and Wiseman, 1995) that may be correlative. The overlying that may serve as a model of marine-terrestrial transitions Upper Mesa Rica Member is a fluvial channel-fill sandstone, during flooding of low-gradient epicontinental seaways. the top of which is another sharp transgressive contact TS 3.2 that is overlain by multiple coarsening-upward mudstone- SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHIC sandstone cycles. Roots and dinosaur footprints occur in FRAMEWORK the lower parasequences, while trace fossils of the Skolithos assemblage are preserved in the upper cycles, which grade The Kiowa-Skull Creek cycle in our study area is composed into the Graneros Shale. The Romeroville Sandstone is not of, in ascending order, the Lytle Sandstone, the Plainview developed in this area. However, a few kilometres west at Formation, the Skull Creek Shale and equivalent Glencairn the Perky/Shields Ranch section a 3 m thick fluvial sandstone Formation in southeastern Colorado, the Tucumcari Shale in occurs in the position of the Romeroville. New Mexico, and the Kiowa Formation in Kansas (Fig. 2). About 70 km north at the Higbee, Colorado section (Fig. 4B) This megacycle is bounded at its base and top by regional the three members of the fluvial Mesa Rica Sandstone overlie unconformities SB1 and SB3.1, and within the megacycle the marine Skull Creek/Glencairn at SB 3.1. This is as far SB2 separates the Lytle from the overlying Plainview or up-dip as the Mesa Rica members can be recognized before equivalent shale (Holbrook and Wright Dunbar, 1992; merging into one unit, and the Dry Creek Canyon Formation Holbrook, 1996, 2001; Scott et al., 2004a; Holbrook et overlies them. The contact is transgressive surface TS 3.2 al., 2006). The age of the Kiowa, Glencairn, Tucumcari and above is blue-gray siltstone and rippled sandstone with a and Skull Creek is narrowly constrained to the lower part diverse trace fossil assemblage. The overlying thick-bedded of the Upper Albian by ammonites, dinoflagellates, and fluvial sandstone is identified as the Romeroville Sandstone. foraminifers (Hancock et al., 1993; Scott et al., 2004a). The base is a sharp erosional contact SB 4 but the top is The succeeding Greenhorn megacycle in the southern part eroded and the Graneros Shale has been removed here as of the Western Interior consists of the Muddy Sandstone, is typical in the region. In the Cucharus/Huerfano Canyon which includes the Dry Creek Canyon Formation (Waage, area, the fluvial Mesa Rica and the Romeroville sandstones 1953) and the Mowry Shale in Colorado, and the Mesa Rica form prominent cliffs and are separated by the Dry Creek Sandstone, the Pajarito Formation, and the Romeroville Canyon Formation (Fig. 4C). The Arenicolites trace fossil Sandstone in New Mexico (Figs. 2, 3). A regional sequence assemblage with dinosaur footprints indicates local marine boundary SB 3.1 occurs at the base of the Mesa Rica influence in the Dry Creek Canyon Formation. The top Sandstone (Scott et al., 2004a). The age of the lower part of the Romeroville is eroded here, but locally throughout of the Greenhorn cycle is constrained by a new radiometric the canyon paralic facies less than 1 m thick separate the date of 98.7 ± 0.31 Ma and by a radiometric date of 95.78 ± Romeroville from the Graneros Shale. From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
204 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
A key section at Fountain Creek (Fig. 4D) north of controls for reconstructing depositional paleoenvironments. Pueblo is located near the type area where Waage (1953) Samples spanned the Kiowa-Skull Creek transgression/ defined the Dry Creek Canyon Formation as a member of regression (T5–R5) and uppermost Dakota-Greenhorn the Dakota Sandstone. The Mesa Rica Sandstone (Lower transgression (T6) cycles (Kauffman, 1984), which have Sandstone unit of Waage, 1953) is in contact with the marine previously been subdivided into two sequences separated Glencairn Formation at SB 3.1. This sandstone interval and by regional unconformities (Weimer, 1984, 1990; Mateer, a thin interval of dark gray shale of the Dry Creek Canyon 1987; Lucas and Kisucky, 1988; Lucas, 1990; Lucas et are repeated by faulting. The top of the Mesa Rica is a al., 1998; Holbrook and Wright Dunbar, 1992; Scott et sharp contact represented by TS 3.1, which is overlain by al., 2004a). Sampling was designed to test for additional, siltstone and shale with marine dinoflagellates (Apteodinium intervening north to south flooding events in the study area. sp. cf. A. deflandrei Clarke and Verdier, Chlamydophorella We augmented facies information from outcrop sections with nyei Cookson and Eisenack, Oligosphaeridium complex photomosaics of adjacent rock exposures to catalogue facies White, Subtilisphaerea deformans Davey and Verdier), the architecture and interrelationship of discontinuity surfaces in acritarchs Fromea amphora Cookson and Eisenack and F. order to put key sections into lateral context. In total, 138 fragilis Cookson and Eisenack, spores, pollen and leaves. samples (mostly siltstone and shale) were processed and The Dry Creek Canyon Formation is a lithologically analyzed for foraminifers, palynomorphs (spores, pollen, complex interval about 16.5 m thick (Fig. 3). It is overlain dinoflagellates, acritarchs) and kerogen or dispersed organic at a sharp contact (SB 4) by a 5-m thick sandstone, which matter; macrofossils were collected and identified. Samples corresponds to the basal bed of Waage’s Upper Sandstone were processed and microfossils identified using standard unit. We interpret this unit as the Romeroville Sandstone, techniques for each fossil group (Traverse 1988; Lipps which was named for strata near its terminus in northernmost 1994). A subset of 102 samples from 17 outcrops were used New Mexico (Lucas and Kues, 1985; Kues and Lucas, to measure total organic carbon (TOC) and total sulfur using ® 1987). Here the Romeroville passes into coastal deposits, a LECO C/S 244 induction furnace at the Biogeochemical including sandstone with marine trace fossils (Bejanar and Laboratory at Indiana University. A Finnigan MAT 252 mass Lessard, 1972; Kues and Lucas, 1987; Lucas, 1990) that are spectrometer was used for isotopic analysis. locally incised by fluvial units interpretable as either valley Kerogen slides were processed from 130 of the 138 paleontological samples collected and used for palynofacies fills above sequence boundary SB 4 or distributary channels interpretation. We identified the following eight types of above surfaces equivalent to SB 4. Farther north, the palynomorph groups and dispersed organic matter: (1) spores Romeroville becomes more clearly terrestrial, occurring as and pollen; (2) fungal remains; (3) marine palynomorphs prominent, cliff-forming fluvial sandstone 0 -16 m thick and (dinoflagellates, acritarchs, foraminiferal linings); (4) incised into older terrestrial and paralic Dry Creek Canyon freshwater algae (Botryococcus, Pediastrum); (5) structured strata. Like the Mesa Rica, Holbrook et al. (2006) extended phytoclasts (wood, cuticles, parenchyma); (6) unstructured the Romeroville into southeastern Colorado to replace the and comminuted phytoclasts (including resins and highly informal, upper sandstone member of the Dakota Sandstone degraded wood); (7) black debris; and (8) amorphous (cf. Long, 1966), thereby raising the Dakota to group status organic matter (AOM). Three hundred particles per slide there, as it is in New Mexico (Kues and Lucas, 1987). were point-counted, and interpreted with minimum variance The lower part of the Dry Canyon correlates with the Euclidean cluster analysis on transformed percentage data Middle Shale Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone to the (Appendices 1–3). The octave scale used is a weighting southeast. Near the middle of the Dry Creek Canyon is a function that converts percentage counts into ten relative prominent sandstone bed about 3 m thick that we correlate abundance classes based on modified log2 scale (Beck and with the Upper Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone to the Strother, 2004). Kovach (2002) wrote the program used for southeast. The underlying shale and siltstone interval is cluster analysis, and the theory behind its use can be found correlated with the Middle Member of the Mesa Rica, and in Gauch (1982) and Kent and Coker (1992). In this study, the overlying siltstone and shale are correlated with the palynofacies assemblages were defined by cluster analyses Pajarito Formation in eastern New Mexico. of the kerogen properties (Figs. 5–7; Table 2). The data were subdivided into four groups to aid interpretation of MATERIAL AND METHODS facies variations across the study area. Just six samples were processed from Sequence 2, i.e. the Glencairn and Tucumcari We measured and sampled twenty-one outcrop sections formations, and they were not subjected to cluster analysis. and one cored well in central and southeastern Colorado, All groups of organic components were considered, but it northeastern New Mexico, and northwestern Oklahoma (Fig. appears that fungal remains and freshwater algae had the 1). The stratigraphic sections in the Front Range in central least effect on the sample clusters (labelled A, B, etc.) used to Colorado (e.g., Rocky Mountain Production Company identify palynofacies assemblages (see also Appendices 1–3 Nordman Trust No. 44-20 well, I-70 Denver section) act as for samples represented in each assemblage). From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 205 Age Aptian-Albian Albian Cenomanian North-central Colorado Seq. 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Seq. 4 emr(1984) Weimer live Sandstone Plainview yl Formation Lytle kl re Shale Creek Skull Formation Morrison Jurassic rnrsSaeGaeo Shale Graneros Shale Graneros or hl or Shale Mowry Shale Mowry Formation (J) Muddy B1 SB B31S 3.1 SB 3.1 SB B2 SB utsn&Kufa (1985) Kauffman & Gustason Dakota Group ot-eta Colorado South-central live Sandstone Plainview Formation Morrison Jurassic
lnar Formation Glencairn Muddy Sandstone Sandstone Lytle Member Sandstone Channel Lower Member Transitional Upper B1 SB B2 SB bhIunb ta.—Fgr 2 Figure — al. et Oboh-Ikuenobe Sandstone Lytle otesen&East- Northeastern & eta e Mexico New central Glencairn Formation Dakota Group (1987) Lucas & Kues ua ta.(1987) al. et Lucas eaRc Sandstone Rica Mesa s Bed Ss. Canyon Romeroville S Long Formation Morrison Jurassic rnrsShale Graneros B2 SB (channel-marine) B1 SB aaioShale Pajarito B3.1 SB
Tucumcari Shale Campana andstone s Bed Ss. eie Seq. Revised Stratigraphy B2 136Ma <103.6 2/ SB S./9 Ma TS3.2/~98 Ma >96.7 4/ TS B31 9 Ma <99 3.1/ SB Scottetal. S2 ~103Ma 2/ TS Ma 97.2 Ma 97.0 S31 87 Ma 98.72 3.1/ TS (2004a) B3.2 SB B1 SB B4 SB Depositional (1984) Kauffman Kiowa-Skull Creek Greenhorn Cycles
T5 R5 T6
Figure 2. Stratigraphic framework of the middle Cretaceous succession in the southern Western Interior Basin. From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
206 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
Lithofacies Lithology Characteristics Typical Biota Environment assemblage 1 Fine to medium Medium-scale trough and planar Abundant plant fragment Fluvial (active grained sandstone cross bedding; channel scours impressions; rare dinosaur channel common and locally lined with mud tracks; minimal burrowing deposition) rip-ups and pebble lags
2 Medium to thick Sandstone - current rippled or small- Abundant plant fragment Fluvial (weak bedded fine-grained scale planar cross bedded; impressions; no significant flow channel sandstone Siltstone/mudstone - thickly burrowing fill) interbedded with laminated to rippled, blue-gray to thin-to very thin pale yellow; exposures are bounded siltstone and and internally portioned by channel mudstone beds scours
3 Dark fissile Dark gray to black, fissile, thin to Intensely rooted; minimal to Swamp shale/muddy thickly laminated, carbonaceous to no animal traces present siltstone coaly, jarosite streaks locally, locally rippled 4 Alternating clay and Commonly varved with alternating Some small burrows locally; Lake silty clay light and dark thinly laminated clay abundant plant fragments and and silty clay; thin-bedded rippled to spores parallel silt partings locally, tabular geometry 5 Muddy siltstone Blue-gray; blocky structure, rippled Rooted horizons locally; very Coastal and with rare, widely and parallel laminated but locally minor burrowing locally non-coastal dispersed and very but typically massive, local well- (Arenicolites, Skolithos, and fluvial flood thin beds of very developed paleosols with red to pink Planolites) in sandstone basin fine-grained alteration halos present, tabular sandstone geometry; siderite concretions found locally 6 Medium to very Sandstone - current and oscillation Abundant plant fragment Marine- thick-bedded fine- rippled and small-to medium-scale impressions; local rooted influenced grained sandstone planar and trough cross bedding; horizons; abundant dinosaur fluvial interbedded with clay draped ripples rare; herringbone tracks; burrows uncommon blue-gray muddy cross bedding and clay-draped Teredolites, Skolithos, siltstone planar cross-bed foresets locally in Planolites, Arenicolites, and thickest beds; Siltstone - rippled-to- rare Thalassinoides thickly laminated
7 Medium to very Sandstone - current and oscillation Lignite fragments and plant Tidally thickly-bedded fine- rippled or small-scale planar cross fragment molds common; influenced grained sandstone bedded; channel scours locally that burrowing is minimal overall point bar interbedded with are commonly lined with clay rip- and comprise Teredolites, thin to very thin- ups; clay-draped ripples common Skolithos, Planolites, bedded silty Mudstone - dark gray, thickly Arenicolites, and rare mudstone laminated-to-rippled Thalassinoides Beds are parallel, and have depositional dip of approximately 10 degrees and constitute “inclined heterolithic strata”
Table 1. Principal lithofacies in Upper Albian–Lower Cenomanian strata of the southern Western Interior Basin (modified after Holbrook, 2001; Akins, 2003). Distribution of lithofacies assemblages is depicted in Figure 3 as follows: assemblages 1–2 (fluvial sandstone); 3–5 (flood basin strata); 6–10a (paralic strata); 10b–12a (restricted shoreline); 12b (open marine strata); and 1–10 (valley-fill undifferentiated).
Figure 3 (right). Longitudinal cross section of Upper Albian–Lower Cenomanian strata in the southern Western Interior Basisn from the Huerfano Canyon area of southeastern Colorado down paleo-depositional dip to east-central New Mexico (Locations shown in Fig. 1); modified from Holbrook et al., 2006). From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 207 Scale 10 m 0 # )"#( )& Uplift Apishipa & &"'(#" $$& #!* ' 10 km
! #* + ""
11-22m 0-16m Huerfano Canyon !# " )!! & ! fluvial, tidal channel, subtidal bar, brackish fill) to freshwater estuary Paralic Strata
weak-flow channel fill) Fluvial Sandstone
!!, !!# &#( ( Mesa Rica Ss Rica Mesa ( $# #,$# )&)'
Longitudinal Profile Scour-depth Romeroville Ss Romeroville (tidally influenced pointbar and other marine-influenced $ # $ & !%# &"'(& !'(#"& ! "!#$ (active channel and bar, TSE
Uplift Las Animas
8-18m Purgatoire Canyon 3-13m
&"' #+& & 1-9m
%)"#)"&- Dry Creek Canyon Fm Canyon Creek Dry
TSE
1-12m
5-19m .5-7m Cahill Canyon Area Flood-Basin Strata lake) $# #,$#& " !# "
"&" !
#+&'& $$&'& ( $# SB4 (97.85Ma to 97.17Ma) &"'&''*)&# '#" (coastal flood basin, swamp, Colorado to 98.47ma) SB3.1 (100ma Dry Cimarron CanyonDry prograding shoreface parasequences, shelf) restricted Restricted Shoreline Restricted
10-15m
0-6m 0-3m 6 #! +,# (! # ( $# Pajarito Fm SB3.2 (98.2Ma to 97.85Ma) '& (brackish to marine estuary fill, (brackish estuary to marine "%#& " ))"& ! ))"& ! &"'&''*)& Open-Marine Strata Open-Marine From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
208 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
' -&$("% %&#)' #& &% ,-- +% +$( ,#&
+( +), +( )/ + ,&)* )!,$&-,-)( ( ,$&-1,( ,-)( ** 1-#$( !$( "+$( ' +$**& ,( ,-)( 0$-#.( (-,$ +$-
)/ + ,&)* )!,$&-,-)( ( ,$&-1,( ,-)( ** 1-#$( !$( "+$( +$**& ,( ,-)( 0$-#.( (- (
(
(
*)
1 ' )+, ($(".*$(- +/& +%"+1!$,,$& ,#& "+ $(".*-)-#$( ,$&-1,( ,-)( ** 1-#$( #.'')%1+),,,-+-$!$ !$( ,( ,-)(
) )+, ($(".*$(- +/&+$**& ,$&-,-)( "+ $(".*-)-#$(' $.' 0/ +$**& !$( -)' $.'"+$( ,( ,-)( -)*$(- (,$/ &1+))- $(),.+-+%, ( $(.** +,( ,-)(
,!!&
1 )+, ($(".*$(- +/&+$**& ,$&-,-)( "+ $(".*-)-#$(' $.' 0/ +$**& ' !$( -)' $.'"+$( ,( ,-)( -)*$(- (,$/ &1+))- $(),.+-+%,
*,
. ( $(.** +,( ,-)( )+, ($(".*$(- +/& +%"+1!$,,$& +)( ).,,#& "+ $(".*-)-#$( ,$&-1,( ,-)( ** 1+))- ' $.' !$( ,( ,-)( 0 && / &)* %,$ $(-)* (- (,$/ &1+))- +$**& !$( ,( ,-)( )/ / +1-#$( +$**& -)*+&& & &'$(- )+(" -)*& 1 &&)0,$&-1'. ,-)( ' $.',& -+)."#( *&(++),, ++!,, ,( ,-)( 0$-##(( &,).+,( &1 +)! !-$ +)( ).,,#& ( ) -.*)!
' $ & + +-&1)/ + -0).*0+ )+, ($("1& , #1& $, ,$ ,&&. "+1,$&-,-)( "+ $(".*-)+$**& ,( ,-)( ( ,-)( '
*0!,, !-$ $.',& -+)."#( *&(++),, ) -.*)! ,( ,-)( 0$-##(( &,).+, '
& ($+( +$( ,#& ( ,#)+ ! ,( ,-)( ( )+'-$)( ' ()-' ,.+ From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 209
Sequence/ Characteristics of palynomorph groups and Marine Palynofacies Cluster dispersed organic matter influence 3.1A Rare marine palynomorphs present; all but one sample Strongly II have amorphous organic matter (AOM); also has highest brackish/ percentages of sporomorphs; variable percentages of Marginal other palynomorphs and organic matter components. marine 3.1B No marine palynomorphs in all samples; some AOM in Non-marine I only three samples of lacustrine origin; variable (Freshwater) percentages of other palynomorph and organic matter components, including very high percentages of unstructured and comminuted phytoclasts in three samples (>89%), and fairly high percentages of black debris in three other samples (~25-40%; evidence of recycling?).
3.2A Highest percentages (3-14%) and diversity of marine Shallow marine III palynomorphs; also has highest percentages (mostly 20- 33%) of AOM; moderate percentages (12-20%) of structured and high percentages (30-70%) of unstructured phytoclasts. 3.2B Less than 2% to 7% of marine palynomorphs in all but Weakly- II six samples; rare to moderate percentages of AOM (1- strongly 20%); fairly high percentages of unstructured and brackish/ comminuted phytoclasts (40-60%); variable but Marginal moderate to high percentages of structured and marine unstructured phytoclasts (18-60%); black debris generally between 6% and 19% in several samples; persistent but low percentages of fungal remains in Earrington Springs samples. 3.2C No marine palynomorphs (except rare occurrence in two Non-marine I samples); all but four samples do not have AOM; rare (Freshwater/ but persistent occurrence of fungal remains and Lake) freshwater algae in samples with AOM (lacustrine); very high percentages of structured phytoclasts (mostly 50-90%); seven samples with moderate to high percentages of black debris (mostly 17-40%). 3.2D No marine palynomorphs or AOM, high to very high Non-marine I percentages of unstructured phytoclasts (31-88%); black (Freshwater/ debris prominent (13-38%) in eight samples. Swamp)
4A Samples have few marine palynomorphs; some AOM Strongly II (3-7%); and moderate to high percentages of structured brackish/ phytoclasts (>45%). Marginal marine 4B Moderate to high percentages of AOM (11-29%) and Shallow III some marine palynomorphs (<1-7%); and high marine percentages of unstructured phytoclasts (47-81%). 4C Highest percentages of AOM (19-29%), the most Shallow III marine palynomorphs in interval (2-7%), and subequal Marine percentages of structured and unstructured phytoclasts.
Table 2. Summary of palynofacies data for sequences 3.1, 3.2 and 4, and correlation with inferred depositional conditions. Figures 5–7 show sample clusters.
Figure 4 (left and next three figures). Representative sections illustrating lithofacies and sequence stratigraphy in the southern Western Interior Basin. See Figure 1 for locations of sections. (A) Etling Lake section at Black Mesa State Park, Cimarron County, Oklahoma. (B) Section near Higbee, Colorado. (C) Section at the Cucharus/Huerfano Canyon. (D) Fountain Creek section. From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
210 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
'% ##,),. ",
#!
* #"'1*/! )#0.,1%& +"-) + .!.,// #""#" / +"/0,+#3'0&!& ++#)/!,1./ ,-.,"#"
! #!'
$%!
* +!)'+#"#.,)'0&'!/0. 0 0&'+ #""#".'--)#"/ +"/0,+#3'0&0&'+/')0/0,+#
'+0#. #""#""'-1-0, "#%.##/),! ))4'+0#+/'2# ',01. 0',+
#
)! #) * #"'1*/! )#0.,1%& +"-) + .!.,// #""#"/ +"/0,+#3'0& ""## !& ++#)/!,1./ $$ '--)#" +"- . ))#)) *'+ 0#" )1#%. 4/')0/0,+# # #"'1*0&'+ #""#".'--)#"$'+#%. '+#"/ +"/0,+#3'0&.,,00. !#/$.,*0,- , ))40&'+)4) *'+ 0#"/& )# #" ,2# ),!(4 )1#%. 4/')0/0,+# $ &'+ #""#".'--)#"/ +"/0,+# $%! ),!(4 )1#%. 4/')0/0,+# !*! . ,+ !#,1//& )#+# .0,-
* ,2#.#"
$%! $%!
#"'1*/! )#0.,1%& +"-) + .!.,// #""#"
* / +"/0,+#3'0&!& ++#)/!,1./ ,-.,"#"
$
#
* !(# )#+! '.+ .'+#/& )# +"/&,.#$ !#/ +"/0,+# +" ,.* 0',+ +,0*# /1.#" *
RESULTS SB 3.1 and SB 3.2 [SB 3.1 separates marine sandstone of the Tucumcari Formation from fluvial sandstone of the Mesa Rica SEQUENCE SUBDIVISIONS Sandstone (Scott et al., 2004a), which were grouped into the Mesa Rica by some previous workers (Gilbert and Asquith, Stratigraphic units are divided into four sequences: (1) 1976; Gage and Asquith, 1977)]; (3) Sequence 3.2—Upper Sequence 2—Glencairn Formation and Tucumcari Shale, Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone, Dry Creek Canyon below sequence boundary SB 3.1; (2) Sequence 3.1—Lower Formation, Pajarito Formation, Huntsman Shale and Van and Middle members of the Mesa Rica Sandstone, between Bibber Shale, between SB 3.2 and SB 4; and (4) Sequence From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 211
0 %-0.*3+*+(+-!+ ) "
"!&0). ("/-+0$%*!,(*- -+.. "!!"!
) .*!./+*"2&/% %**"(. +0-.+,-+!"!
+./(3 +1"-"!+0/ -+,.+#)"!&0) "!!"!.*!./+*" +- ) (0"$-3)..&1".&(/./+*" ! ! &*"$-&*"!-&,,("!.*!./+*" -'$-3 (0"/%& '(3()&*/"!.&(/./+*".)((-++/ ./.&*0,,"- )&*/"-#&*$"-.(/"-((32&/%)"!&0) "!!"!#&*"-&,,("!.*!./+*"2&/% ) *! ,(*/.!&*+.0-#++/
,-&*/. *! )
"!&0). ("/-+0$%*!,(*- -+.. "!!"!
.*!./+*"2&/% %**"(. +0-.
)
-&*".%("*!.%+-"# ".*!./+*"*! *+/)".0-"!
)
4—Romeroville Sandstone, “D” Sandstone and lower correlation of the Albian/Cenomanian boundary in Texas Graneros Shale above SB 4. These sequences correspond defined by ammonites with the Clay Spur Bentonite Bed to the four-step series of transgressive/regressive events of the Mowry Shale (Scott et al., 2004b), which is dated identified in the study area that collectively culminated in at 97.17 ± 0.69 Ma (Obradovich, 1993). Discussion of the the Late Cretaceous Zuni flooding (see discussion of cycles departure from the most recent scale in which the age of this below). boundary is 99.6 ± 0.9 Ma (Gradstein et al., 2004) is beyond The sequences are dated by integration of biostratigraphy our objectives; it is discussed more fully by Oboh-Ikuenobe and radiometric dates (Scott et al., 2004a). The time scale et al. (2007). Obradovich analyzed argon isotope ratios of for the Albian and Cenomanian in this report is based on single crystals from the white bentonite bed at 50.2 m in the From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
212 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
$86/;8?355/ 8>7=+37;//4%/-=38780)++1/ '&;+7<!,; 37=/;?+5<+695/ 858;+.8 +=" C 871) C $86/;8?355/ 8+;9@+;.37=/;?+56=23-4<=+;=371@3=2.+;41;+B<2+5/+7./7.371 %+7.<=87/ @3=2037/1;+37/.<+7.<=87/%9+;;,+=/. +7. %<80 ;8<<,/../.+7.;3995/.037/1;+37/.<+7.<=87/@3=258-+56>.<=87/ )++1/E 9+;=371< +7. 58-4B5+637+=/..+;4=86/.3>61;+B<2+5/ <35= 8; +;4;/.,;8@7=2375B;3995/.037/=8?/;B037/1;+37/.<+7.<=87/@3=2 37=/;?+5<+695/ +,>7.+7=+7..3<
)++1/ 6 ; 312==86/.3>61;+B,;8@7<5312=5B03<<35/=23-45B5+637+=/.=8<5312=5B;3995/. / = <35=<=87/@3=2?/;B037/<+7.<=87/58-+55B%9+;
= *87/8037=/;0371/;37180>73=<+,8?/+7.,/58@ + !$ "!"#"$$ &&# "' " '! #$! " %$$% $!% !$&"
8;6 6
7=/;?+58037-537/.2/=/;853=23-<=;+=+@3=2=237=86/.3>6,/.<80037/1;+37/. D'99/;!/<+ ;3995/.=8-;8<<,/../.<+7.<=87/37=/;,/../.-8708;6+,5B@3=2?/;B=2376/.3>6 $3-+!/6,/; ,/../.;3995/.<35=<=87/+7.6>.<=87/#;/7.+7= !$# 7B87 :>3?+5/7=E " !$#!+7.-0(!!"% 2+;-8+5+,>7.+7=3758@/; 6 + 8+;9@+;.37=/;?+5@3=26/.3>6=237037/?/;B037/<+7.<=87/,/.< +==89 //4
; 6 &2375B5+637+=/.5312==86/.3>61;+B-5+B=8<35=B-5+B03<<35/<2+5/ 7=/;0371/;< D!3..5/!/<+ @3=2,/.<+,8?/ ;B $3-+!/6,/; %+695/.37=+-= :>3?+5/7=E (/;B.+;41;+B=2375B5+637+=/.<2+5/ <35=+7.-87-83.+50;+-=>;/
.37805+1/55+=/<3?/;37108;>73=<+,8?/+7.,/58@ 6 !3A/.=2376/.3>6,/../.;3995/.<+7.<=87/@3=2=237=8?/;B=2376>.<=87/ 9+;=371<+7.@/.1/< 5/712-;8<<,/../.037/1;+37/. <+7.<=87/,>7.+7= !$#+7.!$!#,>;;8@<37=89 6875B +7. -+99/.,B
+>5=/. .>953-+=/.
,/ &2375B5+637+=/.6/.3>6=8.+;41;+B?/;B03<<35/<2+5/ 8-+55B78.>5+;+7.
6 7=/;?+5<+695/ 58-+55B;3995/.%86/@23=/+7.B/558@<=+37371.3?/;
!/ / E <=87 6 . 7 %+ )++1/ 0 37/6/.3>61;+37/.95+7+;+7.=;8>12-;8<<,/../.<+7.<=87/@3=258-+5-871586/;+=3- 8
/ 5+B/;<+7.@88.369;/<<387< +7. $3-+ + <=87 < . 7
!/ 6 %+ ; ; / / 8@ 8@
D
% 6 7-8695/=/;,+=/.<+7.<=87/ 5/7-+3;76 37=/;?+5<+695/ .37805+1/55+=/<<98;/<+7.9855/7 +7. From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 213
Fountain Creek section (Fig. 4D) (Table 5; for methodology 1, 2 and 5 are the most significant in these areas. The fluvial see Obradovich et al., 2002). This bentonite is 10 cm thick strata record a generally aggrading fluvial system. Some and overlies a dark gray shale 24 m above the base of Waage’s minor degree of marine influence is locally apparent in the (1953) Lower Sandstone unit of the Dakota Sandstone. We form of scattered marine trace fossils, and is expressed in the correlate the derived age of 98.72 ± 0.31 Ma to the Middle sandstone layers as lithofacies assemblage 6. This trend is Shale Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone to the southeast. more apparent both up-section and down-dip in both units. These dominantly fluvial units grade down-dip into paralic LITHOFACIES deposits of assemblages 6–10a, which also wedge in from the top of each section. Estuary fill (10a) and subtidal bar (9) Mid-Cretaceous rocks spanning the Plainview through deposits appear to be the most dominant assemblages, but Graneros strata are subdivided into twelve lithofacies fluvial (1, 2) and marine-influenced fluvial (6) assemblages assemblages (Table 1). The Plainview and equivalent are also common, illustrating the intertonguing nature of strata constitute valley-fill deposits with an erosional basal the fluvial and paralic deposits. Some paralic deposits are contact and locally include a wide range of lithofacies. apparent in the Dry Creek Canyon Formation in the up-dip These strata, however, are dominated by terrestrial/fluvial areas of Huerfano Canyon (Fig. 4C). These strata likely channel lithofacies assemblages 1–2 and, to a lesser degree, record a tongue of the Boreal sea which intruded south along paralic assemblages 6 and 9–10a. One distinction between the relatively lower west flank of the Las Animas arch during this unit and higher Mesa Rica and Romeroville units is that maximum transgression at this time (see Discussion section fluvial units are commonly bioturbated. This bioturbation below). Paralic units of the Middle Mesa Rica member and is attributed to both marine influence on fluvial systems Dry Creek Canyon Formation pass down-dip into restricted (assemblage 6) and downward burrowing of fluvial strata shoreline deposits of lithofacies assemblages 10b, 11 and 12a. from above during marine transgression. Marine units of the These assemblages are common in these areas. Locally (e.g., Skull Creek and equivalent strata (lithofacies assemblages 11 John Martin Reservoir, Perky/Shields Ranch, Fife Ranch), and 12) disconformably overlie the Plainview and equivalent deposits of assemblage 12b interfinger with paralic deposits strata. The relative proportions of assemblage 11 and 12 are of the Dry Creek Canyon/Pajarito formation, suggesting variable, with a tendency for more (up to 3–5) intervals of local and ephemeral intrusion of open-marine waters into the assemblage 11 in up-dip regions and fewer (0–2) assemblage extreme down-dip areas during deposition. 11 intervals in down-dip extremes of the Tucumcari Shale. The Graneros Shale is dominated by lithofacies assemblage Assemblage 12a is present among deposits of 12b but is not 12b (although assemblage 12a does occur, particularly in the differentiated in Figure 3. lower part of the section). Shoreface deposits of assemblage The Lower and Upper members of the Mesa Rica 11 are also not found in the Graneros Shale over most of the Sandstone and the Romeroville Sandstone are dominated by area. The upper transitional member of the Dakota Sandstone lithofacies assemblage 1, and, to a lesser degree, lithofacies in the Rocky Mountain exposures (e.g., Vertical Red Wing), assemblage 2. The basal contact of each of these units is however, may record transgressive shoreface sand of this an erosive unconformity, but lithofacies assemblage 6 in lithofacies (Odien, 1997). down-dip areas characterizes their upper surfaces. These units record a high degree of vertical and lateral reworking PALYNOFACIES by fluvial channels, which winnowed finer-grained flood- basin deposits and preserved sheets of sandy, amalgamated Palynofacies assemblages represent non-marine (freshwater/ channel-fill and bar deposits (Holbrook, 2001; Holbrook et weakly brackish; I), strongly brackish/marginal marine al., 2006). The Lower and Upper members of the Mesa Rica (II) and open/shallow marine (III) conditions. These generally interfinger with overlying lithofacies of the Middle interpretations are confirmed by chemofacies data (Appendix Mesa Rica Member and Dry Creek Canyon Formation, 4). The Pajarito Formation in northern New Mexico contains respectively. The contact between the Romeroville and a non-marine assemblage of fifteen spore and pollen taxa overlying Graneros Shale, however, is generally sharp. (R.H. Tschudy in Baltz, 1990). Strata of the Middle Mesa Rica and the Dry Creek Canyon Samples from shallow marine-facies III (e.g., Huntsman Formation may contain all twelve assemblages listed in Shale in the Nordman well and the Graneros Shale) have Table 1. These assemblages are not equally represented, an abundant and diverse assemblage of dinoflagellate cysts and their geographic distribution is not uniform (Fig. 3). and acritarchs, in addition to high percentages of AOM Up-dip areas of both Middle Mesa Rica and Dry Creek and >50% terrestrial components, such as spores, pollen, Canyon are dominated by finer-grained assemblages 3–5, phytoclasts and black debris. The average δ13C value for recording environments typical of fluvial floodplains. These the marine samples is –25.56, and the organic carbon/sulfur floodplain strata encase subequal amounts of fluvial channel (C/S) ratio is 0.16. Samples from the facies of the brackish/ assemblages 1 and 2. Volumetrically, lithofacies assemblages marginal marine paleoenvironments II have rare occurrences From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
214 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
LOWER AND MIDDLE MESA RICA SAMPLES PALYNOFACIES
BRACKISH/ II A MARGINAL MARINE
Unstr./comm. phy toclasts
Lacustrine B I
NON-MARINE
72 60 48 36 24 12 0
Similarity Distance
Figure 5. Dendrograms for the average linkage cluster analysis of palynological samples (Q-mode) and inferred depositional environments of sequence 3.1. of marine palynomorphs and AOM, whereas non-marine al., 2004a), and less common are Trochammina rutherfordi samples (I) lack these two components. The C/S ratios for and Trochammina sp. These species are generally present these latter two assemblages are low, ranging from 0.02 to in the Graneros Shale and rarely in the Pajarito/Dry Creek 1.64 and averaging 0.20. They also have low δ13C values <– Canyon. This assemblage indicates a marginal-marine 25.0. The palynofacies assemblages appear to be similar in paleoenvironment with a mixed Boreal/Tethyan provenance. each stratigraphic interval. Angiosperm and less commonly The Ammobaculites species are most indicative of the conifer foliage is also present in sandstones of the Glencairn southern provenance, and M. ischnia and T. rutherfordi are and Mesa Rica formations (Kues and Lucas, 1987). characteristic of northern provenance in the Mowry Shale, Huntsman Shale and the pre-M. mellariolum interval of the FORAMINIFERAL ASSEMBLAGES Graneros Shale (Loeblich and Tappan, 1950; Eicher, 1960, 1965). No foraminifers were recovered from the mudrock Two assemblages of the Ammobaculites biofacies support interval in the Middle Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone the environmental interpretations (Table 3). A low-diversity above TS 3.1 and below SB 3.2. assemblage consists of seven species and suggests a The Dry Creek Canyon Formation at Fountain Creek, marginal-marine environment (biofacies 2). A moderately and elsewhere in the Colorado Springs area (locality 32 of diverse assemblage is composed of nine species that Long, 1966), yielded siliceous sponge spicules probably supports a shallow marine environment (biofacies 3). The representing a shallow- or marginal-marine fauna. It also low-diversity Ammobaculites biofacies is present above yielded a single specimen of Ammodiscus kiowensis, a marine TS 3.2 in the Pajarito Shale and the Dry Creek Canyon species that is widespread in the Skull Creek Shale and Formation (lithofacies assemblages 1–6) in most sections equivalents in the Western Interior of the U.S.A. and Canada. in southeastern Colorado, the Oklahoma Panhandle sections This foraminiferal species, however, may be reworked from and northeastern New Mexico. The most common taxa the underlying Glencairn Formation because it occurs in the are Ammobaculites obliquus, A. subcretaceus, Miliammina Glencairn at several other localities in southeastern Colorado ischnia and Verneuilinoides perplexus (Long, 1966; Scott et (Long, 1966, pl. 12). From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 215
DRY CREEK CANYON, PAJARITO AND CORRELATIVE SAMPLES PALYNOFACIES A III
BRACKISH/ MARGINAL MARINE B II
Moderate % black debris
Highest % black debris
C I
NON-MARINE
NON-MARINE
D I
Moderate % black debris
180 150 120 90 60 30 0
Similarity Distance
Figure 6. Dendrograms for the average linkage cluster analysis of palynological samples (Q-mode) and inferred depositional environments of sequence 3.2.
ICHNOFACIES AND MACROFOSSILS New Mexico, dinosaur footprints (Hunt and Lucas, 1998) occur on the top bed at the boundary between the Lower and Three ichnofossil assemblages are recognized (Table 3). Middle Mesa Rica members. The progressive addition of ichnotaxa and the reduction The Upper Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone was of dinosaur tracks reflect the change from non-marine to deposited in a fluvial channel system that was transgressed shallow-marine. Ichnofossils are uncommon and of low by paralic environments (Gilbert and Asquith, 1976; Gage diversity in the Middle Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone and Asquith, 1977; Lucas, 1990; Holbrook, 2001; Scott et al., above TS 3.1 (biofacies 1). Locally the paralic (brackish) 2004a). Locally the uppermost bed (TS 3.2) has Planolites, Arenicolites, Planolites, and Skolithos are present with rare Thalassinoides and Rhizocorallium (biofacies 3). This facies dinosaur footprints (biofacies 2); marine Thalassinoides and is similar to the Channel Complex (CH) sandstone facies of Rhizocorallium are rare and localized. At Clayton Lake, the Viking Formation in western Canada (MacEachern and From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
216 Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 48
LOWER GRANEROS AND CORRELATIVE SAMPLES PALYNOFACIES
BRACKISH/ A MARGINAL II MARINE
Few marine palynomorphs; B SHALLOW High % of MARINE III unstr./comm. phytoclasts
C SHALLOW III MARINE
48 40 32 24 16 80 Similarity Distance
Figure 7. Dendrograms for the average linkage cluster analysis of palynological samples (Q-mode) and inferred depositional environments of sequence 4.
Pemberton, 1994; Buatois et al., 2005). Rhizocorallium is and Asquith, 1976; in the Mesa Rica Sandstone—Gage and also characteristic of shoreface and estuarine deposits of the Asquith, 1977). upper Glencairn Formation (Basan and Scott, 1979). Bivalves are unknown in the incipient flooding intervals Above TS 3.2 tracks, trails and burrows are relatively above either TS 3.1 or TS 3.2 north of Tucumcari, New common in sandstones of the Pajarito Formation in the Mexico. South of Tucumcari at the Fife–Lindsey Ranch southeastern area, but to the northwest trace fossils are section, however, the oyster Peilinia levicostata Kues (Lucas absent in the Pajarito interval at the Romeroville Gap section. et al., 2001) is abundant in a thin interval of transported shells, Up-section ichnofossil assemblages are indicative of the and a single mould of a corbulid clam was recovered from following depositional conditions: paralic for the Pajarito a sandstone bed above. Four species of infaunal bivalves Formation, non-marine for the Romeroville Sandstone, and a gastropod occur rarely in the Pajarito Formation in the and marine for the Graneros Shale. The homogeneous Oklahoma panhandle (Kues et al., 1985; Kues and Lucas, sandstone beds in the Pajarito contain root casts up to one 1987). Evidently, fully marine salinity did not develop metre long as well as plant debris. Wood with Teredolites north of these localities in east-central New Mexico and occurs at the Tollgate Pass section. Imprints of a three-toed northwestern Oklahoma. ornithopod dinosaur, belonging to Amblydactylus, are also present in some Pajarito horizons (Kues and Lucas, 1987; INTEGRATED BIOFACIES Lucas et al., 1987; Hunt and Lucas, 1998), and the base of some beds with footprints have casts of Thalassinoides. Assemblages of palynomorphs and foraminifers, and The succeeding thin-bedded sandstones have Arenicolites, ichnofacies have been used to define integrated biofacies Skolithos, Planolites and rare Rhizocorallium burrow fills (Table 3). Dominantly non-marine biofacies 1 is and bedding plane casts of varying diameters, which are characterized by abundant plant and wood fragments, root reminiscent of the Estuary Mouth Complex (EM) assemblage casts, scattered Skolithos, Planolites and dinosaur footprints, of MacEachern and Pemberton (1994) and Buatois et al. diverse and abundant spores and pollen, and is found in (2005). But northwestward the Pajarito comprises delta plain the Middle Shale Member of the Mesa Rica Sandstone and meander-belt facies (in the Dakota Sandstone—Gilbert comprising sequence 3.1. Freshwater algae Botryococcus From Special Paper 48: Dynamics of Epeiric Seas, edited by Pratt and Holmden, copyright 2008 Geological Association of Canada
OBOH-IKUENOBE et al.—epicontinental flooding 217
and Pediastrum were more prominent in a lacustrine in parts of the Dry Creek Canyon Formation, the Pajarito paleoenvironment (lithofacies assemblage 4) in parts of Formation, and lower Graneros Shale comprising sequence southeastern Colorado. Marginal Marine biofacies 2 has 3.2. Shallow-marine biofacies 3 consists of abundant trace dinosaur tracks, Planolites, Arenicolites, Teredolites and fossils (similar types as in biofacies 2 with the exception of Skolithos, rare Thalassinoides and Rhizocorallium, a low- dinosaur tracks), oysters, moderately diverse agglutinate diversity assemblage of agglutinate foraminifers, a low- foraminifers (Ammobaculites assemblage), diverse and diversity assemblage of dinoflagellates cysts and acritarchs, abundant dinoflagellates cysts and acritarchs, a low-diversity and abundant spores and pollen. Biofacies 2 is present spore assemblage, and abundant AOM. Biofacies 3 is found
"IOFACIES 0ALYNOMORPHS &ORAMINIFERA