The Antarctic Sun, January 8, 2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Baby, It's Cold Outside!
Baby, It’s Cold Outside! A Tau Bate reports from the bottom of the planet on a winter of life in the long, dark night of Antarctica By Robert W. Streeter, Wyoming Alpha ’11 HE JOB TODAY IS to in. No way was I going to The United States Antarctic Program is managed by the National go check on a radar give this chance up: I’d Science Foundation. The author is employed by the Antarctic that detects auroras. actually gotten a call to Support Contract to perform work at Amundsen-Scott South t The remote interface Pole Station. He is shown outside the station during the three- work at the South Pole! from my desk in the B2 month summer season when temperatures are around -20 to -30F. I’ll never know what Pod of the elevated sta- exactly qualified me, tion indicates things are above other certainly top- probably just fine, but it’s notch applicants. I started Thursday, and an on-site my application with a check needs to be done. story about my family Were it only a couple caretaking a ranch in win- months ago in December, ter in the remote Wyo- it would be a nice ski with ming Rockies. The ranch a light jacket, tempera- (an active dude ranch in tures in the single-digit the summer season) is negatives Fahrenheit, to situated on the edge of the traverse the 750 meters Gros Ventre Wilderness, to the small elevated not far from Jackson Hole. outbuilding housing the It’s 22 miles from where electronics that power the they stop plowing the array. -
Antarctic Peninsula
Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno. -
6560-50-P Environmental Protection Agency [Epa-Hq
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/28/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-08842, and on govinfo.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0262; FRL-10022-98-OW] Re-Issuance of a General Permit to the National Science Foundation for the Ocean Disposal of Man-Made Ice Piers from its Station at McMurdo Sound in Antarctica AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice; proposed permit. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to re-issue a general permit under the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA) authorizing the National Science Foundation (NSF) to dispose of ice piers in ocean waters. Permit re-issuance is necessary because the current permit is due to expire on May 21, 2021. EPA does not propose substantive changes to the content of the current permit. DATES: Written comments on this proposed general permit will be accepted until [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: This proposed permit is identified as Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0262. Submit your comments to the public docket for this proposed permit at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. All submissions received must include the Docket ID No., and comments received may be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are closed to the public, with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19. -
Nsf.Gov OPP: Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN ANTARCTICA THROUGH INCREASED A LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Washington, D.C. July 23, 2012 This booklet summarizes the report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness. The report was completed at the request of the White House office of science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation. Copies of the full report may be obtained from David Friscic at [email protected] (phone: 703-292-8030). An electronic copy of the report may be downloaded from http://www.nsf.gov/ od/opp/usap_special_review/usap_brp/rpt/index.jsp. Cover art by Zina Deretsky. Front and back inside covers showing McMurdo’s Dry Valleys in Antarctica provided by Craig Dorman. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................ 1 The Panel ............................................... 2 Overall Assessment ................................. 3 U.S. Facilities in Antarctica ....................... 4 The Environmental Challenge .................... 7 Uncertainties in Logistics Planning ............. 8 Activities of Other Nations ....................... 9 Economic Considerations ....................... 10 Major Issues ......................................... 11 Single-Point Failure Modes ..................... 17 Recommendations ................................. 18 Concluding Observations ....................... 21 U.S. ANTARCTIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL WASHINGTON, -
Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND
Management Plan For Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND 1. Description of values to be protected In 1985, two areas at Cape Bird, Ross Island were designated as SSSI No. 10, Caughley Beach (Recommendation XIII-8 (1985)) and SPA No. 20, New College Valley (Recommendation XIII-12 (1985)), following proposals by New Zealand that these areas should be protected because they contained some of the richest stands of moss and associated microflora and fauna in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica. This is the only area on Ross Island where protection is specifically given to plant assemblages and associated ecosystems. At that time, SPA No. 20 was enclosed within SSSI No. 10, in order to provide more stringent access conditions to that part of the Area. In 2000, SSSI No. 10 was incorporated with SPA No. 20 by Measure 1 (2000), with the former area covered by SPA No. 20 becoming a Restricted Zone within the revised SPA No. 20. The boundaries of the Area were revised from the boundaries in the original recommendations, in view of improved mapping and to follow more closely the ridges enclosing the catchment of New College Valley. Caughley Beach itself was adjacent to, but never a part of, the original Area, and for this reason the entire Area was renamed as New College Valley, which was within both of the original sites. The Area was redesignated by Decision 1 (2002) as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 116 and a revised Management Plan was adopted through Measure 1 (2006). -
Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes. -
Reuse of a Site After Remediation. a Case Study from Cape Evans, Ross Island
IP 68 Agenda Item: CEP 6 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Submitted: 23/04/2013 Reuse of a site after remediation. A case study from Cape Evans, Ross Island 1 IP 68 Reuse of a site after remediation. A case study from Cape Evans, Ross Island Information Paper submitted by ASOC1 Abstract The repair and remediation of environmental damage is a current topic at the CEP. Usually sites that have been subject to remediation are no longer used, or are reused by the same operator that conducted the remedial action and that can plan subsequent activities there. However, a different operator may reuse a remediated site without necessarily being aware of the site’s history. The reuse of a remediated site may undo the effects of remediation. This Information Paper examines such an instance, using a case study from a small site at Cape Evans, Ross Island, and makes a number of suggestions relevant to assessing cumulative impacts, assessing the effectiveness of remediation, and managing remediated sites. In most instances, it would be better to concentrate new activities at sites that have already been impacted by earlier activities rather than locating them in near-pristine sites, but there may be scientific and practical value also in leaving some remediated sites undisturbed and subject to ongoing monitoring. Overview The repair and remediation of environmental damage is a topic of current discussion at the CEP. Usually sites are no longer used after remediation, or are reused by the same operator that conducted the remedial action and that can plan subsequent activities there. -
U.S. Advance Exchange of Operational Information, 2005-2006
Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for the 2005–2006 season United States Antarctic Program Office of Polar Programs National Science Foundation Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for 2005/2006 Season Country: UNITED STATES Date Submitted: October 2005 SECTION 1 SHIP OPERATIONS Commercial charter KRASIN Nov. 21, 2005 Depart Vladivostok, Russia Dec. 12-14, 2005 Port Call Lyttleton N.Z. Dec. 17 Arrive 60S Break channel and escort TERN and Tanker Feb. 5, 2006 Depart 60S in route to Vladivostok U.S. Coast Guard Breaker POLAR STAR The POLAR STAR will be in back-up support for icebreaking services if needed. M/V AMERICAN TERN Jan. 15-17, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ Jan. 24, 2006 Arrive Ice edge, McMurdo Sound Jan 25-Feb 1, 2006 At ice pier, McMurdo Sound Feb 2, 2006 Depart McMurdo Feb 13-15, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ T-5 Tanker, (One of five possible vessels. Specific name of vessel to be determined) Jan. 14, 2006 Arrive Ice Edge, McMurdo Sound Jan. 15-19, 2006 At Ice Pier, McMurdo. Re-fuel Station Jan. 19, 2006 Depart McMurdo R/V LAURENCE M. GOULD For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/lmg/lmgsched.pdf R/V NATHANIEL B. PALMER For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/nbp/nbpsched.pdf SECTION 2 AIR OPERATIONS Information on planned air operations (see attached sheets) SECTION 3 STATIONS a) New stations or refuges not previously notified: NONE b) Stations closed or refuges abandoned and not previously notified: NONE SECTION 4 LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES AFFECTING OTHER NATIONS a) McMurdo airstrip will be used by Italian and New Zealand C-130s and Italian Twin Otters b) McMurdo Heliport will be used by New Zealand and Italian helicopters c) Extensive air, sea and land logistic cooperative support with New Zealand d) Twin Otters to pass through Rothera (UK) upon arrival and departure from Antarctica e) Italian Twin Otter will likely pass through South Pole and McMurdo. -
Die Expedition ANT-XXIV/2
Die Expedition ANT-XXIV/2 Wochenberichte 5. Dezember 2007 13. Dezember 2007 19. Dezember 2007 29. Dezember 2007 3. Januar 2008 10. Januar 2008 16. Januar 2008 25. Januar 2008 4. Februar 2008 Überblick und Fahrtverlauf Der Schwerpunkt der wissenschaftliche Anteil der Expedition ist drei Projekten des Internationalen Polarjahres IPY gewidmet. SCACE – Synoptische Studie des Zirumantarktischen Klima- und Ökosystems – untersucht physikalische und biologische Zusammenhänge im antarktischen Zirkumpolarstrom (ACC) um die entsprechenden Mechanismen aufzuklären, die die Ozeanproduktivität und den Wassermassentransport bestimmen. SYSCO – Gekoppelte Systeme in der Tiefsee – untersucht den Einfluss der pelago-benthischen Kopplung in der Tiefsee in ausgewählten Gebieten zwischen der Subtropischen Konvergenz und dem antarktischen Kontinent. LAKRIS – Lazarevsee Krill Studie – bestimmt die Verteilungsmuster, Lebenszyklen und die Physiologie antarktischen Krills in der Lazarevsee. Eine weitere wichtige Aufgabe ist der unterstützende eisbrechende Einsatz für die zwei Transportschiffe, die Material für die neue Neumayer III Station anliefern. Zusätzlich wird Polarstern so früh die Eisbedingungen es zulassen Neumayer II mit Proviant, Material und Treibstoff für die Sommerkampagne versorgen. Fahrtverlauf: 28. November 2007 Auslaufen Kapstadt 30. November 2007: Beginn der Beobachtungen während der Fahrt 4. Dezember 2007: Beginn der Stationsarbeiten ca. 10 Dezember 2007 (abhängig von der Eisbedeckung): Versorgung Neumayer 28.Januar 2008: Ende der Stationsarbeiten -
Blue Sky Airlines
GPS Support to the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs 2001-2002 Season Report GPS Support to the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs 2001-2002 Season Report April 15, 2002 Bjorn Johns Chuck Kurnik Shad O’Neel UCAR/UNAVCO Facility University Corporation for Atmospheric Research 3340 Mitchell Lane Boulder, CO 80301 (303) 497-8034 www.unavco.ucar.edu Support funded by the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs Scientific Program Order No. 2 (EAR-9903413) to Cooperative Agreement No. 9732665 Cover photo: Erebus Ice Tongue Mapping – B-017 1 UNAVCO 2001-2002 Report Table of Contents: Summary........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Table 1 – 2001-2001 Antarctic Support Provided................................................................................. 4 Table 2 – 2001 Arctic Support Provided................................................................................................ 4 Science Support............................................................................................................................................. 5 Training.................................................................................................................................................... 5 Field Support........................................................................................................................................... 5 Data Processing .................................................................................................................................... -
United States Antarctic Program S Nm 5 Helicopter Landing Facilities 22 2010-11 Ms 180 N Manuela (! USAP Helo Sites (! ANZ Helo Sites This Page: 1
160°E 165°E ALL170°E FACILITIES Terra Nova Bay s United States Antarctic Program nm 5 22 Helicopter Landing Facilities ms 180 n Manuela 2010-11 (! (! This page: USAP Helo Sites ANZ Helo Sites 75°S 1. All facilities 75°S 2. Ross Island Maps by Brad Herried Facilities provided by 3. Koettlitz Glacier Area ANTARCTIC GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION CENTER United States Antarctic Program Next page: 4. Dry Valleys August 2010 Basemap data from ADD / LIMA ROSS ISLAND Peak Brimstone P Cape Bird (ASPA 116) (! (! Mt Bird Franklin Is 76°S Island 76°S 90 nms Lewis Bay (A ! ay (ASPA 156) Mt Erebus (Fang Camp)(! ( (! Tripp Island Fang Glacier ror vasse Lower Erebus Hut Ter rth Cre (!(! Mt No Hoopers Shoulder (!M (! (! (! (! Pony Lake (! Mt Erebus (!(! Cape Cape Royds Cones (AWS Site 114) Crozier (ASPA 124) o y Convoy Range Beaufort Island (AS Battleship Promontory C SPA 105) Granite Harbour Cape Roberts Mt Seuss (! Cotton Glacier Cape Evans rk 77°S T s ad (! Turks Head ! (!(! ( 77°S AWS 101 - Tent Island Big Razorback Island CH Surv ey Site 4 McMurdo Station CH Su (! (! rvey Sit s CH te 3 Survey (! Scott Base m y Site 2 n McMurdo Station CH W Wint - ules Island ! 5 5 t 3 Ju ( er Stora AWS 113 - J l AWS 108 3 ge - Biesia Site (! da Crevasse 1 F AWS Ferrell (! 108 - Bies (! (! siada Cr (! revasse Cape Chocolate (! AWS 113 - Jules Island 78°S AWS 109 Hobbs Glacier 9 - White Is la 78°S nd Salmon Valley L (! Lorne AWS AWS 111 - Cape s (! Spencer Range m Garwood Valley (main camp) Bratina I Warren n (! (!na Island 45 Marshall Vall (! Valley Ross I Miers Valley (main -
US Coast Guard Polar Ice Operations Program AICC March
U.S.U.S. CoastCoast GuardGuard PolarPolar IceIce OperationsOperations ProgramProgram AICCAICC MarchMarch ‘04‘04 Polar Icebreaker Mission Analysis Purpose: Evaluate “national” polar icebreaking mission needs through the year 2020. Method: Contractor will gain input from various Polar Icebreaker “customers” to determine polar region mission needs and recommended systems to accomplish mission goals. Goal of Mission Analysis: A mission analysis is required as the first step in the Gov’t’s Major Acquisition Process. Since POLAR performance & reliability are declining rapidly, we need to complete this study as soon as possible. 2 Mission Analysis Details • Identify & analyze past, current & potential future polar missions through the year 2020. • Identify current capability shortfalls • Identify technological improvements that could improve mission effectiveness and efficiency. • Identify viable alternative methods of mission success • Identify & quantify polar region logistics & science support. • Identify potential icebreaker support for future NW passage or northern sea route marine operations. • Evaluate, analyze and quantify various systems that could most efficiently and effectively accomplish USCG polar region missions through the year 2020. 3 Mission Analysis Details (cont’d) • Evaluate equipment & science communication needs onboard polar icebreakers. • Evaluate USCG science personnel support and determine most viable & effective method to meet science research needs • Evaluate level of aerial asset support currently provided and needed