DOCSLIB.ORG

Rescission of Certain Power Reactor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 May 3, 2019 Holders of Licenses for Operating Power Reactors as Listed in the Enclosure SUBJECT: WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN POWER REACTOR SECURITY ORDERS APPLICABLE TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) supplemented the security measures required for protection against the design-basis threat at nuclear power reactor facilities through a series of security orders. These orders established new requirements for plant security, emergency preparedness, and training enhancements. Following the issuance of the orders, each operating reactor licensee addressed the actions in the power reactor security orders in a response to the NRC. In its review of licensees' responses to the security orders, the NRC staff (the staff) found that licensees had incorporated many of the order requirements into their respective NRC-approved physical security, emergency preparedness, training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans. The NRC amended Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Parts 50, 52, 72, and 73, including Appendices B and C to Part 73, through a final rule ("Power Reactor Security Requirements") published in the Federal Register on March 27, 2009 (74 FR 13925). The rulemaking codified generically applicable security requirements previously issued by orders and updated the existing power reactor security requirements. The rule became effective on May 26, 2009. The NRC required licensees to be in compliance with the final rule no later than March 31, 2010. The power reactor security rulemaking incorporated all or part of the requirements set forth in the following power reactor security orders: • EA-02-026, "Order for Interim Safeguards and Security Compensatory Measures," dated February 25, 2002 (Partial) • EA-02-261, "Order for Compensatory Measures Related to Access Au.thorization," dated January 7, 2003 (All} • EA-03-039, "Order for Compensatory Measures Related to Training Enhancements on Tactical and Firearms Proficiency and Physical Fitness Applicable to Armed Nuclear Power Plant Security Force Personnel," dated April 29, 2003 (All) Therefore, the NRC staff determined that the generically applicable security requirements set forth in the orders were adequately captured in the applicable NRC regulations, and the requirements of Orders EA-02-261 and EA-03-039 were withdrawn in their entirety, while the - 2 - requirements of Order EA-02-026 were withdrawn in part. Specifically, all requirements in Order EA-02-026 were withdrawn except Requirements B.1.a, B.5.d, and B.5.e. Requirement B.5.d requires the licensee to review Safeguards and Emergency Plans and take actions to ensure that emergency onsite staffing, facilities, and procedures are adequate to accomplish actions necessary for response to terrorist threats. The Safeguards portion was previously .addressed in security rulemakings through a final rule ("Power Reactor Security Requirements") published in the Federal Register on March 27, 2009 (7 4 FR 13925). Requirement B.5.e requires the licensee to provide emergency action levels to ensure that a site-specific credible threat results in a declaration of at least a Notification of Unusual Event. It also requires the licensee to review and validate the strategy for escalation to higher event classifications. The NRC subsequently amended the emergency preparedness regulations in 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," specifically, 10 CFR 50.47, "Emergency Plans," and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities," through a final rule ("Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations") published in the Federal Register on November 23, 2011 (76 FR 72560). The rule became effective on December 23, 2011. The three requirements in Order EA-02-026 that were not previously withdrawn had not been completely captured in regulations following the 2009 rulemaking. Requirements B.5.d (partially captured) and B.5.e (not captured) were incorporated into regulations via the November 2011 emergency preparedness final rule. Therefore, I hereby withdraw Requirements B.5.d and B.5.e of Order EA-02-026. The remaining requirement of Order EA-02-026 not covered by existing regulations (B.1.a) involves operator training and remains in effect. Licensees should assess the impact that the withdrawal of these two requirements from Order EA-02-026 will have on their facility licenses and emergency plans to determine if any additional actions or changes are necessary to ensure compliance with the current regulatory requirements. Please contact your licensing project manager to facilitate resolution of any issue related to the information provided in this letter, or if you have any other questions. Sincerely, Ho K. Nieh, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos.: See enclosure cc: Listserv LIST OF APPLICABLE POWER REACTOR LICENSEES Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Entergy Operations, Inc. Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296 License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 License Nos. DPR-33, DPR-52 and DPR-68 ANO Site Vice President Mr. Joseph W. Shea Arkansas Nuclear One Vice President, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Entergy Operations, Inc. and Support Services 1448 S.R. 333 Tennessee Valley Authority Russellville, AR 72802 1101 Market Street, LP 4A Chattanooga, TN 37 402-2801 Beaver Valley Power Station First Energy Nuclear Operating Company Docket Nos. 50-334 and 50-412 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant License Nos. DPR-66 and NPF-73 Duke Energy Progress, LLC Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324 Mr. Richard D. Bologna License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62 Site Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Mr. William R. Gideon Beaver Valley Power Station Site Vice President P.O. Box 4, Route 168 Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Shippingport, PA 15077 8470 River Rd ., SE (M/C BNP001) Southport, NC 28461 Braidwood Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. STN 50-456 and STN 50-457 Exelon Generation Company, LLC License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 Docket Nos. STN 50-454 and STN 50-455 License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior Vice President Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Exelon Generation Company, LLC Senior Vice President President and Chief Nuclear Officer CNO) Exelon Generation Company, LLC Exelon Nuclear President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Braidwood Station Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Byron Station Warrenville, IL 60555 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Enclosure - 2 - Callaway Plant Columbia Generating Station Union Electric Company Energy Northwest Docket No. 50-483 Docket No. 50-397 License No. NPF-30 License No. NPF-21 Mr. Fadi Diya Mr. Bradley J. Sawatzke Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer Chief Nuclear Officer Energy Northwest Ameren Missouri Columbia Generating Station Callaway Plant MD 1023 8315 County Road 459 76 North Power Plant Loop Fulton, MO 65077 North Power Plant Loop P.O. Box 968 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Richland, WA 99352-0968 Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC Docket Nos. 50-317 and 50-318 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant License Nos. DPR-53 and DPR-69 Vistra Operations Company, LLC Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson, Senior Vice President License Nos. NPF-87 and NPF-89 Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer Mr. Ken J. Peters Exelon Nuclear Senior Vice President & 4300 Winfield Road Chief Nuclear Officer Warrenville, IL 60555 Attention: Regulatory Affairs Vistra Operations Company, LLC Catawba Nuclear Station Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC 6322 N FM 56 Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 P.O. Box 1002 License Nos. NPF-35 and NPF-52 Glen Rose, TX 76043 Mr. Robert T. Simril Cooper Nuclear Station Site Vice President Nebraska Public Power District Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Docket No. 50-298 Catawba Nuclear Station License No. DPR-46 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 Mr. John Dent, Jr. Vice President-Nuclear and CNO Clinton Power Station Nebraska Public Power District Exelon Generation Company, LLC Cooper Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-461 72676 648A Avenue License No. NPF-62 Brownville, NE 68321 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) Exelon Nuclear Clinton Power Station 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 -3- Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Dresden Nuclear Power Station First Energy Nuclear Operating Company Exelon Generation Company, LLC Docket No. 50-346 Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249 License No. NPF-3 License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 Mr. Mark Bezilla Mr. Brya_n C. Hanson Site Vice President Senior Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Exelon Generation Company, LLC Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station President and Chief Nuclear Officer 5501 N. State Route 2 Exelon Nuclear Mail Stop A-DB-3080 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Oak Harbor, OH 43449-9760 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 Diablo Canyon Power Plant Pacific Gas and Electric Company Duane Arnold Energy Center Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC License Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82 Docket No. 50-331 License No. DPR-49 Mr. James M. Welsch Vice President, Nuclear Generation and Mr. Mano Nazar Chief Nuclear Officer President and Chief Nuclear Officer Pacific Gas and Electric Company Nuclear Division Diablo Canyon Power Plant NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC P.O. Box 56, Mail Code 104/6 Mail Stop: EX/JB Avila Beach, CA 93424 700 Universe Blvd. Juno Beach, FL 33408 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Indiana Michigan Power Company Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 Southern Nuclear Operating Co., Inc. License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-7 4 Docket Nos.
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Radiation Sample Plan

    Environmental Radiation Sample Plan

    2018 PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION SURVEILLANCE IN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF Health and Human Services Division of Health and Service Regulation, Radiation Protection Section 5505 Creedmor road Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 Telephone: (919) 814-2250 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION Purpose of Plan. 1 Present Objectives of Program . 1-2 2018-PLAN FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION SURVEILLANCE Summary. 3-4 Statewide Surveillance. 5-7 Nuclear Facility Surveillance. 8-10 Site and Sample Maps. 11 Introduction The 2018 Environmental Radiation Surveillance Program will continue monitoring the radioactivity levels in the North Carolina environment. The purpose of this plan and the program’s objectives are included in this brief introduction. Purpose of Plan The purpose of this plan is to present the environmental radiological sampling program in North Carolina. This plan will assist the program’s sample collection staff in scheduling their sampling frequencies and time of sampling. Program staff document information concerning procedures used in the field and the State Laboratory of Public Health, such as field sampling, sampling preparation, counting equipment operation and data analyses. This information is available by contacting the environmental group in the Radioactive Materials Branch (RAM) of the Radiation Protection Section (RPS) in the Division of Health and Service Regulation. For more information about the section, please visit the RPS Web site at www.ncradiation.net. Present Objectives The program’s basic objectives is to monitor for potential releases of radioactivity from the three nuclear power plants operating in North Carolina, which have a combined total of five reactors, and one operating nuclear plant in South Carolina.
  • Vermont Motion to Intervene Request on VY License Transfer

    Vermont Motion to Intervene Request on VY License Transfer

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of ) ) ENTERGY NUCLEAR VERMONT ) YANKEE, LLC AND ENTERGY ) Docket No. 50-271-LT-2 NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.; ) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL ) June 13, 2017 OF TRANSFER OF LICENSE AND ) CONFORMING AMENDMENT ) ) (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) ) STATE OF VERMONT’S PETITION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND HEARING REQUEST Stephanie Hoffman Kyle H. Landis-Marinello Special Counsel Assistant Attorney General Vermont Department of Public Service Vermont Attorney General’s Office 112 State Street – Drawer 20 Environmental Protection Division Montpelier, VT 05620 109 State Street (802) 828-5543 Montpelier, VT 05609 [email protected] (802) 828-1361 [email protected] Counsel for the State of Vermont TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 STANDING .................................................................................................................................... 4 THE STATE PRESENTS TWO CONTENTIONS THAT MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f) AND ARE ADMISSIBLE ...................................... 4 CONTENTION I ............................................................................................................................ 7 THE LICENSE TRANSFER AND AMENDMENT REQUEST INVOLVES A POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD; DOES NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT
  • Management Handbook 2020

    Management Handbook 2020

    MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK 2020 Energy Northwest may revise or discontinue policies, procedures, or benefits described in this handbook, and/or institute new policies, procedures, or benefits. This handbook nor any other Energy Northwest policies, procedures, or practices (whether verbal or written) or the acceptance or continuance of employment are to be construed as a contract of employment, a promise of continued employment, or as creating an implied or contractual duty between an employee and Energy Northwest. All employment may be terminated "at will” by Energy Northwest or the employee for lawful reasons. Management Handbook 2020 Introduction Congratulations and welcome to Energy Northwest’s leadership team! You are part of a group of highly skilled professionals focused each day on the relentless pursuit of excellence through continuous improvement. This ensures we provide our public power members and regional ratepayers with safe, reliable, cost-effective, responsible power generation and energy solutions. I want to personally thank you for stepping up to the challenge of leadership on our management team. It’s a very important position to our agency, and to the people you lead. This handbook gives you the guidelines and resources to manage and direct your staff to help them accomplish individual and agency goals. It contains much of the information you will need to be successful in your leadership role here at Energy Northwest; it describes the many important programs, processes and resources available to you. The handbook also lists key expectations for supervisors and managers. I encourage you to use this handbook often as you get started in management, and keep it as a reference throughout your career with the agency.
  • Final Environmental Assessment for the Energy Northwest WNP-1/4 Lease Renewal January 2017 I

    Final Environmental Assessment for the Energy Northwest WNP-1/4 Lease Renewal January 2017 I

    DOE/EA-2044 Assessment Energy Northwest WNP-1/4 Lease Renewal, Hanford Site, Washington January 2017 U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office Richland, WA 99352 Approved for Public Release; Further Dissemination Unlimited U.S. Department of Energy DOE/EA-2044 Terms Used in this Document Area of Potential Effect (APE) – the geographic area within which an undertaking may cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, if such properties exist. The APE is influenced by the scale and nature of the undertaking. Best Management Practices (BMPs) – Standard activities, operating procedures, and practices that are used to prevent or reduce potential environmental impacts from project activities. Cultural Resources - A general term used to refer to a wide range of resources, including historic structures, archaeological sites, places of traditional, religious and cultural significance, sacred sites, Native American human remains, and associated objects that are entitled to special consideration under federal statute, regulations, and executive orders. Energy Northwest (EN) – the municipal corporation and joint operating agency that owns both the Industrial Development Complex (IDC) and the Columbia Generating Station (CGS) Federal Threatened or Endangered Species - Plant or animal species that are at risk of becoming endangered in the near future throughout all or a significant part of their range. Threatened or endangered status is formally designated by a listing process under the Endangered Species Act (16 USC 1531 et seq.). Industrial Development Complex (IDC) – the collective name applied to the area occupied by Washington Nuclear Projects Number 1 and Number 4 (WNP-1/4) that reflects the current industrial nature of the site.
  • TVA's Bad Nuclear

    TVA's Bad Nuclear

    TVA’s Bad Nuclear Bet: Gambling BILLIONS on Bellefonte Reactors Prepared by the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy August 2011 Executive Summary “The circumstances for Bellefonte Units 1 and 2 are unique; no other licensee has ever given up its construction permits, partially dismantled the plant and allowed the facility to degrade, then requested that the permits be reissued.” -Joseph F. Williams, NRC Senior Project Manager1 The history of the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) Bellefonte site in Jackson County, Alabama spans nearly 40 years. A total of four reactors have been proposed, and billions of dollars have been spent, but not a single kilowatt of electricity has ever been produced. After allowing the site to sit idle for more than 20 years and scrapping the facility for spare parts, TVA is now proposing to restart construction of the Bellefonte Unit 1 reactor, which may be one of the greatest gambles in the agency’s history. Southern Alliance for Clean Energy has serious concerns about TVA’s push to complete the mothballed, abandoned Bellefonte reactors. Bellefonte’s unique and complicated history is compounded by that fact that, in order to complete construction of the reactors, TVA faces unique and complicated problems—many worse than any other reactor project has previously faced. This report documents some of our concerns and makes it clear that finishing Bellefonte is not a gamble worth taking. Our concerns include Bellefonte's long, complicated history; multiple safety concerns that have not been addressed; the troubled history of the Babcock &Wilcox “Mark-C 205” design; the unnecessary and costly nature of Bellefonte; and additional obstacles.
  • Exelon Nuclear Fact Sheet Exelon Nuclear, a Division of Exelon Generation, Is Headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa

    Exelon Nuclear Fact Sheet Exelon Nuclear, a Division of Exelon Generation, Is Headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa

    Exelon Nuclear Fact Sheet Exelon Nuclear, a division of Exelon Generation, is headquartered in Kennett Square, Pa. and operates the largest U.S. fleet of carbon-free nuclear plants with more than 17,800 megawatts of capacity from 21 reactors at 12 facilities in Illinois, Maryland, New York and Pennsylvania. Dave Rhoades is President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Exelon Nuclear. There are more than 10,000 nuclear professionals working in Exelon Generation’s nuclear division. These professionals implement industry best practices to ensure safe, reliable operation throughout Exelon’s nuclear fleet. Exelon believes that clean, affordable energy is the key to a brighter, more sustainable future. Exelon’s nuclear power plants account for approximately 60 percent of Exelon’s power generation portfolio. Nuclear power plants are critical to the stability of the U.S. electrical grid because they can produce an uninterrupted flow of electricity for extended periods. This uninterrupted flow supplies the necessary level of baseload electricity for the grid to operate around-the-clock. Exelon’s nuclear stations Braidwood Generating Station Braceville, Illinois Byron Generating Station Byron, Illinois Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Lusby, Maryland Clinton Power Station Clinton, Illinois Dresden Generating Station Morris, Illinois FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Scriba, New York Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Ontario, New York LaSalle County Generating Station Marseilles, Illinois Limerick Generating Station Pottstown, Pennsylvania Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Scriba, New York Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Delta, Pennsylvania Quad Cities Generating Station Cordova, Illinois Updated: January 2021 .
  • Nuclear Power Summary – Licensing Actions August 2020

    Nuclear Power Summary – Licensing Actions August 2020

    NUCLEAR POWER SUMMARY – LICENSING ACTIONS AUGUST 2020 Congressional Legislative Action: o August 2020: • The American Nuclear Infrastructure Act of 2020, which was heard by the Senate’s Committee on Environment and Public Works on August 5, 2020, will enable U.S. international leadership, preserve America’s uranium supply chain, reduce carbon emissions, and strengthen our economic, energy, and national security. • The Nuclear Energy Leadership Act (NELA), included in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2021, was passed by the Senate on July 23, 2020. NELA will help facilitate the path to market for advanced reactors by allowing the federal government to be an early adopter of commercialized technologies; providing for needed scientific research facilities; demonstrating advanced reactor concepts; breaking down fuel availability barriers when the market cannot; and training the next generation of nuclear scientists. • The Nuclear Energy for the Future Act (HR 6796), which was introduced to the House on May 8, 2020, builds on the Nuclear Energy Innovation Capabilities Act (NEICA) to provide full authorization for the Versatile Test Reactor. • The Nuclear Energy Research and Development Act (HR 6097) was passed by the House Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Energy on March 12, 2020 and forwarded to the full Committee. This act would authorize many programs within the Office of Nuclear Energy, including further research and development on the existing fleet of reactors, advanced reactors, hybrid energy systems, and advanced fuels. • The Integrated Energy Systems Act of 2019 (S 2702), which was heard by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on December 17, 2019, would direct the Department of Energy to establish an integrated energy systems research, development, and demonstration program.
  • Savannah River Site, 700/A Area, Site Administration, Safety, Security, And

    Savannah River Site, 700/A Area, Site Administration, Safety, Security, And

    SAVANNAH RIVER SITE COLD WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION 700/A AREA SITE ADMINISTRATION, SAFETY, SECURITY, AND SUPPORT Aiken County, South Carolina NEW SOUTH ASSOCIATES 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 SAVANNAH RIVER SITE COLD WAR HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION NARRATIVE AND PHOTOGRAPHY 700/A AREA – SITE ADMINISTRATION, SAFETY, SECURITY, AND SUPPORT Aiken County, South Carolina Report submitted to: Washington Savannah River Company • Aiken, SC Report prepared by: New South Associates • 6150 East Ponce de Leon Avenue • Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083 Terri Gillett Mary Beth Reed Mark T. Swanson Steven Gaither May 25, 2007 • Final Report New South Associates Technical Report 1433 ii ABSTRACT ABSTRACT This documentation was prepared in accordance with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed by the Department of Energy–Savannah River (DOE-SR) and the South Carolina Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) dated February 17, 2004, as well as the Consolidated MOA of August 2004. The MOA stipulated that a thematic study and photographic documentation be undertaken on A Area historic properties 703-A and 708-A. In addition, a Cultural Resource Management Plan was accepted and signed by DOE-SR and the SHPO on December 9, 2004 calling for documentation of the remainder of the A Area buildings that were deemed eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) as contributing resources to a Savannah River Site (SRS) Cold War Historic District. The impetus for the study was the imminent decommissioning and/or dismantling of the majority of NRHP eligible buildings in A Area. The resulting narrative is based on field analysis, oral history, primary documentation and research.
  • American Nuclear Society ANS 3.5

    American Nuclear Society ANS 3.5

    ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 DiscussionDiscussion OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--33--55 UsageUsage UpdateUpdate SummarySummary ofof ChangesChanges ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS -- AmericanAmerican NuclearNuclear SocietySociety ANSIANSI -- AmericanAmerican NationalNational StandardsStandards InstituteInstitute ANSANS--3.53.5 -- WorkingWorking GroupGroup isis comprisedcomprised ofof Industry,Industry, Regulatory,Regulatory, andand Organizational/IndividualOrganizational/Individual VolunteersVolunteers ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembershipMembership ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup BalanceBalance ofof InterestsInterests NRC-1 7% VENDORS-3 20% UTILITY-9 60% ORG-2 13% ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSANS--3.53.5 OfficersOfficers ListList ChairChair -- TimothyTimothy DennisDennis – Individual (chair of ANS-21/member NFSC executive committee) ViceVice--chairchair -- JimJim FlorenceFlorence – Nebraska Public Power District - Cooper Nuclear Station SecretarySecretary -- KeithKeith WelchelWelchel – Duke Energy - Oconee Nuclear Station EditorEditor -- FF JJ (Butch)(Butch) ColbyColby – L3 Communications MAPPS Inc (formerly CAE) StyleStyle EditorEditor -- WilliamWilliam MM (Mike)(Mike) ShellyShelly – Entergy Services, Inc ParliamentarianParliamentarian –– LawrenceLawrence VickVick – U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission ANSANS--3.53.5 UtilitiesUtilities JamesJames
  • Ornl/Nsic-176

    Ornl/Nsic-176

    4 ggcBvePBtnc APR 291980 ORNL/NSIC-176 MASTER Descriptions of Selected Accidents that Have Occurred at Nuclear Reactor Facilities H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center NUCLFAR SAFETY INFORMATION CENTER DIEmu'lhj \i 'uNLIMIlt.il c ORNL/NSIC-176 Contract No. W-7405-eng-26 Engineering Technology Division DESCRIPTIONS OF SFLEuTED ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITIES H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center Date Published: April 1980 Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORArORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION for the DEPARTMENT OP ENERGY tP MTOWiOtl Cf THIS MCU«»T It IHWWTW iii CONTENTS (7 Page FOREWORD ...» v PREFACE . vli 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. NUCLEAR REACTORS: FUNDAMENTALS .' 3 2.1 Basic Theory 3 2.2 The Components of a Nuclear Reactor 8 2.3 Radioactivity , 11 2.4 Electric Power Plants .... 16 2.5 Classification of Reactors 17 2.6 Light-Water Reactors for the Production of Electricity ..... 19 3. CENTRAL STATION POWER PLANTS. 32 3.1 Fuel Melting Incideat at the Fermi Reactor (1966) 32 3.2 Electrical Cable Fires at San Onofre 1 (1968) 33 3.3 Fuel Meltdown at St. Laurent (1969) 35 3.4 Uncovering of the Core at La Crosse (1970) 38 3.5 Seven Injured When Steam Nozzle Breaks at Robinson 2 (1970) 39 3.6 Discharge of Primary System into Drywell at Did 'en 2 (1970) 42 3.7 Turbine Damage Caused by Human Error at Robinson 2 (1970) 45 3.8 Construction Fire at Indian Point 2 (1971) 46 3.9 Valve Separations at Turkey Point 3 (1971) 47 3.10 Turbine Basement Flooded at Quad Cities V?I2) 48 3.11 Steam Generator Damaged in Hot Tests at Oconee 1 (1972) 49 3.12 Two Fatalities in Steam Line Accident at Surry 1 (1972) 50 3.13 Seawater Intrusion into Primary System at Millstone 1 (1972) ..
  • EMS-01 Use Category: INFORMATION Major Rev: 014 Minor Rev: 001 Title: Environmental Management System Program Description Page: 1 of 81

    EMS-01 Use Category: INFORMATION Major Rev: 014 Minor Rev: 001 Title: Environmental Management System Program Description Page: 1 of 81

    Initials Verify Revision Information Prior To Use Date Number: EMS-01 Use Category: INFORMATION Major Rev: 014 Minor Rev: 001 Title: Environmental Management System Program Description Page: 1 of 81 PCN#: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM N/A *EMS-01* Effective Date: 6/30/16 EMS-01 Number: EMS-01 Use Category: INFORMATION Major Rev: 014 Minor Rev: 001 Title: Environmental Management System Program Description Page: 2 of 81 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES Justification (required for major revision) Update is the result of the annual procedure review (AR 347279) and to address deficiency identified in CR 335161 and CR 335225. Page(s) Description (including summary, reason, initiating document, if applicable) All Updated reference to GBP-REC-02 and SWP-REC-02. All Minor spelling and grammar corrections. All Removed outdated reference to GBP-ENV-12 and replaced with RPI-29.0. 6 Section 5.0 - Updated management section. 11 Section 8.9 - Removed outdated reference to RPI-20.0 and referenced E&RP SharePoint for list of permits. 13 Section 9.2 - Removed revision dates of PSM-5.7. 15 Section 9.3 – Added reference to GBP-PUR-02. 28 Section 9.8 - Added reference to GBP-REC-03 to section on public record request. Added reference to the Regulatory Communication Database on SharePoint. 31-32 Section 9.10 - Added reference to GBP-PRO-01 to relevant procedure section for document control. Clarified document control requirements (CR 335161). 33-34 Section 9.11 – Updated records management requirements to address protection and storage of environmental records (CR 335225). 44 Section 9.16 – Removed third paragraph that discussed GBP-ENV-12 requires mangers are informed of environmental issues.
  • FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–October 2019

    FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–October 2019

    FEDERAL REGISTER INDEX January–October 2019 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Ground Water Protection at Uranium In Situ Recovery Facilities – 574 RULES ( Jan 31); 6979 ( Mar 1) Access Authorization and Fitness-for-Duty Determinations – 43667 ( Aug 22) Harmonization of Transportation Safety Requirements with IAEA Adjustment of Civil Penalties for Inflation for Fiscal Year 2019 – 2433 ( Feb 7) Standards – 14898 ( Apr 12) Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR1400) Design Certification – 23439 List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: ( May 22) Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Cask System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment No. 13 – 6086 ( Feb 26) Advanced Power Reactor 1400 Design Certification – 41885 ( Aug 16) Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, Clarification of Export Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Facilities, Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment No. 14 – 52815 Equipment, and Non-Nuclear Materials – 12483 ( Apr 2) ( Oct 3) Final State Agreement: Holtec International Storage, Transport and Repository 100 Storage Vermont: Discontinuance of Certain Commission Regulatory Authority System, Certificate of Compliance No. 1008, Amendment No. within the State – 51365 ( Sep 30) 3 – 43729 ( Aug 22) List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: NAC International NAC-UMS Universal Storage System, Certificate of Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Cask System, Certificate of Compliance Compliance No. 1015, Amendment No. 7 – 21728 ( May 15) No. 1014, Amendment No. 13 – 6055 ( Feb 26); 16201 ( Apr 18) Measurement Standards Used at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants – 21727 Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, ( May 15) Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment No. 14 – 52747 Measurement Standards Used at U.S. Nuclear Power Plants; ( Oct 3) Correction – 33710 ( Jul 15) Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Multipurpose Canister Cask System, Certificate of Compliance No.